Thermal ablation

热烧蚀
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的几十年中,诊断监测和技术创新的增加大大增加了甲状腺切除术的数量。虽然甲状腺切除术仍然是治疗的第一线,其他微创和保守的选择应用在非常有选择的情况下已经提出。这篇综述的目的是说明这些技术的优缺点。
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    射频消融(RFA)是治疗甲状腺结节的一种有效且安全的方法。结节破裂是RFA的主要并发症。由于缺乏临床经验且对其处理没有共识,因此对结节破裂的自然史知之甚少。全面回顾结节破裂的表现,诊断,管理是需要的。
    我们报告一例结节破裂病例并进行文献复习。共包括33例RFA后结节破裂患者,和他们的临床表现,管理,并对结局进行收集和分析.
    结节破裂在RFA手术后7个月内出现急性肿胀(90.3%)和疼痛(77.4%),最常见的原因是甲状腺前囊破坏(87%),可以用超声诊断。大多数破裂可以保守管理,以我们报道的病例为例。没有报告的长期后遗症病例。
    结节破裂是RFA第二常见的主要并发症。根据现有证据,我们提出了结节破裂的治疗算法,并对未来的数据收集提出了建议,以弥补我们对破裂病因和有效治疗的理解差距.
    UNASSIGNED: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an effective and safe modality for the treatment of thyroid nodules. Nodule rupture is a major complication of RFA. There is little known on the natural history of nodule rupture due to a lack of clinical experience and no consensus on its management. A comprehensive review of nodule rupture presentation, diagnosis, and management is needed.
    UNASSIGNED: We report a case of nodule rupture and conduct a literature review. A total of 33 patients experiencing nodule rupture after RFA were included, and their clinical presentation, management, and outcomes were collected and analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: Nodule rupture presents with acute swelling (90.3%) and pain (77.4%) within 7 months of RFA procedure, most commonly due to disruption of the anterior thyroid capsule (87%), and can be diagnosed with ultrasonography. Most ruptures can be managed conservatively, exemplified by our reported case. There are no reported cases of long-term sequalae.
    UNASSIGNED: Nodule rupture is the second most common major complication of RFA. Based on the available evidence, we propose a treatment algorithm for nodule rupture and recommendations for future data collection to address gaps in our understanding of rupture etiology and effective management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肺肿瘤是与高死亡率相关的常见恶性肿瘤,造成重大的医疗和社会负担。尽管免疫疗法显示出改善生存率的希望,反应率相对适中。热消融不仅可以直接消除肿瘤细胞,还可以增强抗肿瘤免疫反应,因此表现出与免疫治疗协同作用的显著倾向。
    结论:在这篇综述中,我们简要概述了热消融在周围型肺肿瘤中的应用.我们总结了热消融的患者选择。我们强调了热消融增强抗肿瘤免疫反应的潜力,为联合疗法提供了一个有希望的途径。我们总结了评估热消融和免疫治疗在临床前和临床环境中的协同作用的研究。最后,我们强调了在将热消融和免疫疗法应用于肺部肿瘤患者时需要深入探索的紧迫问题.
    结论:这篇综述强调了在周围型肺肿瘤患者中使用热消融联合免疫治疗的前景。然而,需要进一步的研究来加强和优化这种治疗策略.
    BACKGROUND: Lung tumors are prevalent malignancies associated with a high mortality rate, imposing significant medical and societal burdens. Although immunotherapy shows promise in improving survival, response rates are relatively modest. Thermal ablation can not only eliminate tumor cells directly but also enhance antitumor immunity response, thus manifesting a remarkable propensity to synergize with immunotherapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this review, we provided a brief overview of the application of thermal ablation in peripheral lung tumors. We summarized the patient selection of thermal ablation. We highlighted the potential of thermal ablation to augment the antitumor immune response, offering a promising avenue for combined therapies. We summarized studies assessing the synergistic effects of thermal ablation and immunotherapy in preclinical and clinical settings. Lastly, we underscored the urgent issues that warrant in-depth exploration when applying thermal ablation and immunotherapy to lung tumor patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: This review emphasized the prospects of using thermal ablation combined with immunotherapy in patients with peripheral lung tumors. However, further research is needed to enhance and optimize this treatment strategy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:临床研究表明热消融(TA)治疗多灶性甲状腺乳头状微癌(MPTMC)的潜在安全性和有效性。然而,对其有效性仍缺乏全面系统的评估。
    方法:PubMed,系统搜索EMBASE和CochraneLibrary数据库,查找直到2023年10月23日发表的研究报告,这些研究报告了热消融在MPTMC管理中的有效性。根据PRISMA中概述的指南,由两名审阅者独立进行数据提取和方法学质量评估。
    结果:这项系统评价和荟萃分析从四项研究中确定了169例患者中的389例肿瘤。用不同的TA处理后,MPTMC完全消失的合并率为92.8%[95%置信区间(CI):68.2-100],总并发症的合并率为4.4%[95%CI:1.5-8.5].在后续期间,仅2例患者观察到局部肿瘤复发,合并率为0.2%[95%CI:0.0-2.6];3例患者观察到淋巴结转移(LNM),合并率为1.2%[95%CI:0-4.1].此外,6例患者发展新的PTMC。值得注意的是,在随访期间没有观察到患者发生远处转移,并且没有患者在接受消融术后延迟手术。
    结论:对于患有MPTMC的患者,TA作为实现局部肿瘤控制的极好方法出现。尽管如此,实现有利的结果需要严格的纳入标准和深厚的专业水平。
    BACKGROUND: Clinical studies have indicated the potential safety and efficacy of thermal ablation (TA) in treating multifocal papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (MPTMC). However, a comprehensive systematic evaluation of its effectiveness was still lack.
    METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies published until October 23, 2023, that reported on the effectiveness of thermal ablation in the management of MPTMC. Data extraction and methodological quality assessment were independently conducted by two reviewers following the guidelines outlined in the PRISMA.
    RESULTS: This systematic review and meta-analysis identified 389 tumors in 169 patients from four studies. After treatment with different TA, the combined rate of complete disappearance of MPTMC was 92.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 68.2-100] and the combined rate of overall complications was 4.4% [95% CI: 1.5-8.5]. During the follow-up period, local tumor recurrence was observed in only 2 patients with a combined rate of 0.2% [95% CI: 0.0-2.6]; lymph node metastasis (LNM) was observed in 3 patients with a combined rate of 1.2% [95% CI: 0-4.1]. Additionally, 6 patients developed new PTMC. It is noteworthy that no patients were observed to develop distant metastases during the follow-up period, and no patients had delayed surgery after underwent ablation.
    CONCLUSIONS: For patients grappling with MPTMC, TA emerges as an excellent approach for achieving localized tumor control. Nonetheless, achieving favorable outcomes necessitates stringent inclusion criteria and a profound level of expertize.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:经皮热消融技术(pTA)是射频消融,冷冻消融,和微波消融,适用于治疗骨寡转移。磁共振引导聚焦超声(MRgFUS)是一种无创消融技术。
    目的:比较MRgFUS和pTA治疗骨寡转移酶及其并发症的有效性和安全性。
    方法:选择PICO/PRISMA方案:pTA或MRgFUS治疗骨寡转移患者的研究;非排他性治愈性治疗。排除标准为:原发性骨肿瘤;同步放射治疗;姑息治疗;随访时无影像学检查。PubMed,BioMedCentral,Scopus被搜查了.改良的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估文章质量。对于每种治疗(pTA和MRgFUS),我们进行了两项单独的随机效应荟萃分析,以评估汇总的有效性和安全性.通过结合达到局部肿瘤控制(LTC)的治疗病变的比例来评估有效性;通过结合治疗患者的并发症发生率来评估安全性。进行荟萃回归分析以确定任何结果预测因子。
    结果:共纳入24篇。MRgFUS的合并LTC率为84%(N=7,95%CI66-97%,I2=74.7%)与65%的pTA(N=17,95%CI51-78%,I2=89.3%)。合并并发症发生率相似,分别,13%(95%CI1-32%,I2=81.0%),MRgFUS和12%(95%CI8-18%,I2=39.9%)pTA,但仅pTA记录了主要并发症。荟萃回归分析,包括技术类型,研究设计,肿瘤,和后续行动,没有发现重要的预测因素。
    结论:发现两种技术的有效性和安全性具有可比性,尽管MRgFUS是一种无创性治疗,不会引起任何重大并发症.MRgFUS的数据有限以及缺乏与pTA的直接比较可能会影响这些发现。
    结论:MRgFUS可以是有效的,安全,和骨寡转移的非侵入性治疗。需要进行直接比较研究,以确认其可观的益处。
    BACKGROUND: The percutaneous thermal ablation techniques (pTA) are radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, and microwave ablation, suitable for the treatment of bone oligometastases. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a noninvasive ablation technique.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of MRgFUS and pTA for treating bone oligometastases and their complications.
    METHODS: Studies were selected with a PICO/PRISMA protocol: pTA or MRgFUS in patients with bone oligometastases; non-exclusive curative treatment. Exclusion criteria were: primary bone tumor; concurrent radiation therapy; palliative therapy; and absence of imaging at follow-up. PubMed, BioMed Central, and Scopus were searched. The modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed articles quality. For each treatment (pTA and MRgFUS), we conducted two separate random-effects meta-analyses to estimate the pooled effectiveness and safety. The effectiveness was assessed by combining the proportions of treated lesions achieving local tumor control (LTC); the safety by combining the complications rates of treated patients. Meta-regression analyses were performed to identify any outcome predictor.
    RESULTS: A total of 24 articles were included. Pooled LTC rate for MRgFUS was 84% (N = 7, 95% CI 66-97%, I2 = 74.7%) compared to 65% of pTA (N = 17, 95% CI 51-78%, I2 = 89.3%). Pooled complications rate was similar, respectively, 13% (95% CI 1-32%, I2 = 81.0%) for MRgFUS and 12% (95% CI 8-18%, I2 = 39.9%) for pTA, but major complications were recorded with pTA only. The meta-regression analyses, including technique type, study design, tumor, and follow-up, found no significant predictors.
    CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness and safety of the two techniques were found comparable, even though MRgFUS is a noninvasive treatment that did not cause any major complication. Limited data availability on MRgFUS and the lack of direct comparisons with pTA may affect these findings.
    CONCLUSIONS: MRgFUS can be a valid, safe, and noninvasive treatment for bone oligometastases. Direct comparison studies are needed to confirm its promising benefits.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    热消融(TA)与肝切除术(LR)后肝硬化患者肝细胞癌(HCC)的结果存在争议。我们的目的是比较总生存期(OS),无病生存率(DFS),肝硬化患者TA和LR治疗肝癌后的手术结果。直到2022年11月15日,我们搜索了PubMed,Embase,和Cochrane数据库使用医学主题标题术语和其他术语,并使用Newcastle-Ottawa文献评价量表对入选研究的质量进行评价。操作系统,DFS,提取并分析手术结果。荟萃分析显示,5项倾向评分匹配(PSM)研究包括933例患者(463TAvs.包括470LR)。经过分析,TA和LR在1年OS(比值比[OR]1.68;95%置信区间[CI]1.01-2.78;P=0.05)和3年OS(OR0.76;95%CI0.56-1.04;P=0.08)下的结果相似,而LR增加5年OS(OR0.37;95%CI0.18-0.74;P=0.005)。除了DFS,LR患者的1年DFS显著较高.然而,比较TA和LR时,3年和5年DFS没有明显差异。LR组的手术时间和住院时间更长。此外,LR组患者围手术期输血率和主要并发症发生率明显较高。我们的研究证明,LR利用OS和DFS的肝癌肝硬化患者。需要其他精心设计的随机对照试验。
    The outcomes of cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after thermal ablation (TA) versus liver resection (LR) are debated. We aimed to compare the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and operative outcomes after TA and LR for HCC in patients with cirrhosis. Until November 15, 2022, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases by using Medical Subject Heading terms and other terms, and used the Newcastle-Ottawa literature evaluation scale to assess the quality of selected studies. OS, DFS, and operative outcomes were extracted and analyzed. The meta-analysis showed that 5 propensity-score matched (PSM) studies including 933 patients (463 TA vs. 470 LR) were included. After analysis, TA and LR had similar results at 1-year OS (odds ratio [OR] 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.78; P = 0.05) and 3-year OS (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.56-1.04; P = 0.08), whereas LR increased 5-years OS (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.18-0.74; P = 0.005). In addition to the DFS, the 1-year DFS was significantly higher in patients with LR. However, there were no obvious differences in 3-year and 5-year DFS when comparing TA and LR. The length of operative time and hospital stay were longer in the LR group. Besides, the LR group had significantly higher rate of perioperative blood transfusions and major complications. Our research proved that LR took advantage of OS and DFS for HCC patients with cirrhosis. Additional well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估肝癌术中(腹腔镜/腹腔镜)微波消融的技术和临床结果。
    方法:这是一项回顾性单中心研究,评估2017年7月1日至2023年6月30日术中微波消融治疗非常早期/早期HCC的连续患者。在这些患者中,由于结节的可见度或有害位置欠佳,因此排除了经皮US引导入路,并对较深的位置或粘连进行了肝切除.关于临床阶段的数据,手术方法,肝脏病理和结节特征,技术上的成功,并发症,并收集了后续行动。技术上的成功是由于在后续的CT/MRI控制中没有局部区域的持久性。
    结果:共纳入36例肝硬化患者(M:F=30:6,中位年龄67岁);18/36(50%)有一个结节,13/36(36%)有两个,4/36有三个(11%),和1/36有4(3%)。在患者中,24例(67%)采用腹腔镜治疗,12/36(33%)采用剖腹手术。将60个16.5mm(6-50mm)的HCC用100W的功率处理7分钟(2-30分钟)。总共成功治疗了55个结节(92%),并且在术后第一次随访中没有残留的增强;其他5/60(8%)接受了化学/放射栓塞。有一种并发症(3%):经皮引流和胶水栓塞治疗胆瘘。平均住院时间为3.5天(1-51天),平均随访238天(13~1792天)。随访期间,5/36例(14%)患者行肝移植,1/36(2%)在住院期间逝世亡,1在出院后逝世亡。
    结论:腹腔镜/腹腔镜术中HCCMW消融在不适合经皮入路或肝切除术的患者中是可行的,罕见并发症,技术和临床效果良好。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate technical and clinical outcomes of intraoperative (laparoscopic/laparotomic) microwave ablation on HCC.
    METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center study evaluating consecutive patients treated for very early/early-stage HCC with intraoperative microwave ablation from 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2023. In these patients, a percutaneous US-guided approach was excluded due to the nodule\'s suboptimal visibility or harmful location and liver resection for a deep position or adherences. Data about the clinical stage, surgical approach, liver pathology and nodules characteristics, technical success, complications, and follow-up were collected. Technical success was intended as the absence of locoregional persistence at follow-up CT/MRI controls.
    RESULTS: A total of 36 cirrhotic patients (M:F = 30:6, median age 67 years) were enrolled; 18/36 (50%) had a single nodule, 13/36 (36%) had two, 4/36 had three (11%), and 1/36 had four (3%). Among the patients, 24 (67%) were treated with laparoscopy, and 12/36 (33%) with a laparotomic approach. Sixty HCCs of 16.5 mm (6-50 mm) were treated for 7 min (2-30 min) with 100 W of power. A total of 55 nodules (92%) were treated successfully and showed no residual enhancement at the first postoperative follow-up; the other 5/60 (8%) underwent chemo/radioembolization. There was one complication (3%): a biliary fistula treated with percutaneous drainage and glue embolization. The average hospital stay was 3.5 days (1-51 days), and patients were followed up on average for 238 days (13-1792 days). During follow-up, 5/36 patients (14%) underwent liver transplantation, 1/36 (2%) died during hospitalization and 1 after discharge.
    CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic/laparotomic intraoperative HCC MW ablation is feasible in patients unsuitable for percutaneous approach or hepatic resection, with rare complications and with good technical and clinical outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    骨样骨瘤是最常见的良性肌肉骨骼肿瘤之一。射频消融是非保守治疗骨样骨瘤的首选方法。最近,高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)已被提出作为一种更安全的选择。本研究的目的是回顾HIFU在骨样骨瘤治疗中的疗效和副作用。在PubMed进行了全面搜索,科学直接,和临床关键,直到2022年6月30日。人口统计数据,基线特征,成功率,术前和术后疼痛评分,复发,并记录并发症。本系统综述包括11项研究。涉及186名受试者的汇总分析的总体成功率为91.94%。在两项研究中报告了复发,其中发生在4/177(2.26%)受试者中。皮肤烧伤1例(0.54%)。未报告重大或其他并发症。三项研究比较了HIFU和RFA的成功率。RFA组的成功率略高,差异无统计学意义(p=0.15)。高强度聚焦超声显示了有希望的结果。它为骨样骨瘤提供了一种更安全的治疗方法,尤其是在儿童中,并且可以考虑RFA后的顽固性病例。尽管如此,预计将来会有更多的研究。
    Osteoid osteoma is one of the most frequent benign musculoskeletal neoplasm. Radiofrequency ablation is the method of choice for non-conservative treatment of osteoid osteoma. Recently, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has been proposed as a safer option. The objective of this study is to review the efficacy and side effects of HIFU in the management of osteoid osteoma. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Science Direct, and Clinical Key until June 30, 2022. Demographic data, baseline characteristics, success rates, pre- and post-procedure pain scores, recurrences, and complications were recorded. Eleven studies were included in this systematic review. Pooled analysis that involved 186 subjects resulted in an overall success rate of 91.94%. Recurrence was reported in two studies, in which it occurred in 4/177 (2.26%) subjects. Skin burn was found in 1 (0.54%) patients. No major or other complications were reported. Three studies compared the success rate of HIFU and RFA. Success rate was slightly higher in the RFA group with insignificant difference (p = 0.15). High-intensity focused ultrasound showed promising results. It offers a safer treatment approach for osteoid osteoma, especially in children, and can be considered for recalcitrant cases after RFA. Nonetheless, more studies are expected in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:结直肠癌(CRC)是美国癌症相关死亡的第二大常见原因。对于选定的病例,当根除所有可见的消融边缘大于5mm的肿瘤时,热消融(TA)可以替代部分肝切除术。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在囊括有关结直肠癌肝转移(CLM)患者局部治愈的最佳TA切缘的当前临床证据。
    方法:MEDLINE,EMBASE,和CENTRAL数据库从开始到2023年5月1日,根据PRISMA指南进行了系统搜索。效果测量包括使用随机效应模型的95%置信区间(CI)的风险比(RR)。
    结果:总体而言,包括21项研究,包括2005名参与者和2873例消融CLM。边缘小于5mm的TA与LTP的3.6倍高的风险相关(n=21项研究,RR:3.60;95%CI:2.58-5.03;p值<0.001)。当使用3D软件额外确认小于5毫米的余量时,LTP的风险高5.1倍(n=4项研究,RR:5.10;95%CI:1.45-17.90;p值<0.001)。此外,小于10毫米但超过5毫米的热消融裕度与LTP的3.64倍风险显着相关最小边距大于10毫米(n=7项研究,RR:3.64;95%CI:1.31-10.10;p值<0.001)。
    结论:这项荟萃分析表明,超过5mm的最小消融裕度是所需的最小临界终点,而至少10mm的最小边缘在CLM的TA后产生最佳的局部肿瘤控制。
    BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the US. Thermal ablation (TA) can be a comparable alternative to partial hepatectomy for selected cases when eradication of all visible tumor with an ablative margin of greater than 5 mm is achieved. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to encapsulate the current clinical evidence concerning the optimal TA margin for local cure in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM).
    METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the CENTRAL databases were systematically searched from inception until 1 May 2023, in accordance with the PRISMA Guidelines. Measure of effect included the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model.
    RESULTS: Overall, 21 studies were included, comprising 2005 participants and 2873 ablated CLMs. TA with margins less than 5 mm were associated with a 3.6 times higher risk for LTP (n = 21 studies, RR: 3.60; 95% CI: 2.58-5.03; p-value < 0.001). When margins less than 5 mm were additionally confirmed by using 3D software, a 5.1 times higher risk for LTP (n = 4 studies, RR: 5.10; 95% CI: 1.45-17.90; p-value < 0.001) was recorded. Moreover, a thermal ablation margin of less than 10 mm but over 5 mm remained significantly associated with 3.64 times higher risk for LTP vs. minimal margin larger than 10 mm (n = 7 studies, RR: 3.64; 95% CI: 1.31-10.10; p-value < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis solidifies that a minimal ablation margin over 5 mm is the minimum critical endpoint required, whereas a minimal margin of at least 10 mm yields optimal local tumor control after TA of CLMs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to identify, evaluate, and summarize the findings of the literature on existing computational models for radiofrequency and microwave thermal liver ablation planning and compare their accuracy.
    METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in the MEDLINE and Web of Science databases. Characteristics of the computational model and validation method of the included articles were retrieved.
    RESULTS: The literature search identified 780 articles, of which 35 were included. A total of 19 articles focused on simulating radiofrequency ablation (RFA) zones, and 16 focused on microwave ablation (MWA) zones. Out of the 16 articles simulating MWA, only 2 used in vivo experiments to validate their simulations. Out of the 19 articles simulating RFA, 10 articles used in vivo validation. Dice similarity coefficients describing the overlap between in vivo experiments and simulated RFA zones varied between 0.418 and 0.728, with mean surface deviations varying between 1.1 mm and 8.67 mm.
    CONCLUSIONS: Computational models to simulate ablation zones of MWA and RFA show considerable heterogeneity in model type and validation methods. It is currently unknown which model is most accurate and best suitable for use in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号