Disclosures of sibling sexual behavior (SSB) usually affect all family members but there remains, however, a paucity in studies on therapeutical family interventions and how they can initiate changes in families. This study was designed to explore relational impacts of SSB disclosures, goals for therapy and interventions that helped a family initiate the recovery process after a SSB disclosure. A single case study design was used to analyze a family\'s long-term therapy process. Data on this N = 1 study comprised 18 interviews with involved therapists, five interviews with involved family members, therapy files, and notes on family sessions. Data was analyzed using a thematic approach. Relational traumas were experienced in broken relationships, relationships under pressure and damaged trust between family members. Therapy goals were to (1) recreate family\'s safety, (2) help the family process the SSB consequences and (3) restore trust and search for relationship healing. Appropriate interventions to target the goals included individual-centered psycho trauma treatment as well as interventions for the parents, the involved siblings, and the uninvolved siblings, followed by sessions between the involved siblings and with the whole family. Therapy outcomes were found in reduced individual trauma symptoms, a recreated sense of family safety, the start of relational trauma processing, and newfound forms of sibling/family relationships. This study provides a unique and comprehensive insight into a family\'s healing process after SSB disclosures from the perspectives of both professionals and family members. The effective interventions identified in this study may provide tools for therapists working with these families. This study may also offer greater insights into both the abusive and mutual types of SSB.

BACKGROUND: Many people experience long-term symptoms such as fatigue, cognitive problems, or shortness of breath after an acute infection with COVID-19. This emerging syndrome, known as long COVID, is new and complex in many aspects. This study aims to collect the experiences of people with long COVID with ambulatory healthcare structures.
METHODS: Four focus groups were conducted with a total of 23 adults with long COVID in June and July 2022. These discussions were audio-recorded, subsequently transcribed, and analyzed using the qualitative content analysis of Mayring and Kuckartz.
RESULTS: Fourteen out of 19 participants who had a primary care encounter regarding their long COVID symptoms did not perceive it as helpful. Many respondents reported that their general practitioners did not take their long COVID symptoms seriously and did not refer them to specialists or made therapeutic recommendations. However, some participants reported that they were prescribed non-pharmaceutical therapies (e.g., group meetings supported by psychotherapists, occupational therapy, etc.) that improved their condition. 14 of 23 respondents perceived care barriers such as providers\' lack of awareness of long COVID, poor access to specialists, a lack of specialized care (e.g., long COVID clinics), or high bureaucratic hurdles for specific healthcare services. To improve medical care, participants suggested campaigns to raise awareness of long COVID among healthcare providers and the general population, increase research and government investments regarding the development of treatment structures for long COVID, expanding existing therapeutic services, and establishing one-stop shops for integrated specialist healthcare for people with long COVID.
CONCLUSIONS: Several implications for healthcare professionals and policymakers can be derived from this study: (1) general practitioners should take the symptoms of long COVID seriously, assume a care coordinating role, make referrals, and establish contact with long COVID clinics; (2) care planners should focus on developing interprofessional evidence-based care and treatment approaches for long COVID; (3) existing care structures such as long COVID outpatient clinics should be expanded. The overarching goal must be to develop consistent guidelines for long COVID diagnosis, care, and treatment.
BACKGROUND: The study is registered in the German register for clinical trials (DRKS00026007, first registration on 09/09/2021).

Preterm labor, regarded as the onset of labor before 37 weeks of gestation, is a highly prevalent issue in obstetrics with repercussions for neonatal health. This review article presents an in-depth analysis of the alliance between serum magnesium levels and preterm labor. The review explores the physiological roles of magnesium right through pregnancy, including its significance for energy metabolism, smooth muscle contraction, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), and protein synthesis. It addresses cellular transport and the homeostasis of magnesium. The pathophysiological processes encompassing inflammation, oxidative stress, calcium regulation, smooth muscle contractility, and neuroendocrine pathways are investigated. The review evaluates epidemiological studies investigating the alliance between serum magnesium levels and preterm labor. The review incorporates an assortment of study varieties, such as observational studies, case-control studies, prospective cohort studies, and meta-analyses. In the course of reviewing the prognostic relevance of serum magnesium levels in premature labor, therapeutic implications involving diagnostic precision, prognostic significance, and therapeutic response assessment have additionally been addressed. Therapeutic interventions targeting magnesium levels, such as magnesium supplementation, tocolytic therapy, and the role of magnesium in antenatal corticosteroid administration, are explored. This review provides an in-depth evaluation of the correlation between serum magnesium levels and preterm labor, stressing its therapeutic significance and repercussions for future research and treatment strategies.

To evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant, capacitive resistive monopolar radiofrequency (CRMRF, INDIBA) treatment at 448 kHz together with physiotherapeutic techniques compared to a sham treatment with the same techniques, for pain reduction and quality of life (QoL) improvements in patients with chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS).
A triple-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) including patients with CPPS randomly allocated (1:1) to a CRMRF-activated group (intervention) or a CRMRF-deactivated one (control). Both groups received physiotherapeutic techniques and pain education weekly for 10 consecutive weeks. Data from a visual analogical scale and the SF-12 questionnaire were collected at trial commencement and repeated at the 5th and 10th sessions. Pain intensity was considered the main outcome. For the comparisons between variables, the χ2 and Student\'s t test were used. Superiority was analyzed by estimating the mean change (95% confidence interval). Analysis was performed for the per-protocol and the intention-to-treat populations. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05.
Eighty-one patients were included (67.9% women) with a mean age of 43.6 years (SD 12.9). CRMRF lessened pain scores by more than 2 points and improved QoL by 5 points. There were no relevant side effects and overall adherence to the treatment was 86.4%.
This is the first RCT that evaluates the efficacy of CRMRF (INDIBA) compared to a sham treatment, and demonstrates its superiority in decreasing pain and improving QoL. Such results may lead to greater prescribing of CRMRF when treating CPPS patients.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) is a multifactorial disorder that affects 5.7% to 26.6% of women and 2.2% to 9.7% of men, characterized by hypersensitivity of the central and peripheral nervous system affecting bladder and genital function. People with CPPS have much higher rates of psychological disorders (anxiety, depression, and catastrophizing) that increase the severity of chronic pain and worsen quality of life. Myofascial therapy, manual therapy, and treatment of trigger points are proven therapeutic options for this syndrome. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of capacitive resistive monopolar radiofrequency (CRMRF) at 448 kHz as an adjunct treatment to other physiotherapeutic techniques for reducing pain and improving the quality of life of patients with CPPS.
METHODS: This triple-blind (1:1) randomized controlled trial will include 80 women and men with CPPS. Participants will be randomized into a CRMRF activated group or a CRMRF deactivated group and receive physiotherapeutic techniques and pain education. The groups will undergo treatment for 10 consecutive weeks. At the beginning of the trial there will be an evaluation of pain intensity (using VAS), quality of life (using the SF-12), kinesiophobia (using the TSK-11), and catastrophism (using the PCS), as well as at the sixth and tenth sessions.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study will show that CRMRF benefits the treatment of patients with CPPS, together with physiotherapeutic techniques and pain education. These results could offer an alternative conservative treatment option for these patients.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03797911 . Registered on 8 January 2019.

Introduction Advanced cancer patients often need therapy for symptomatic control, in addition to cancer and other disease treatments. As the cancer disease progresses and life expectancy decreases, there should be a change in the goal of care. If this change is not accompanied by therapeutic adjustments, there is a risk of maintaining useless and ineffective treatments, as well as potential harmful drug interactions. This study analyzed the prevalence of therapeutic futility in patients with advanced cancer disease. Materials and methods This was a retrospective and observational single-center study, that included advanced cancer patients who died during the hospital stay, at a University Hospital in Lisbon, Portugal. Demographic and clinical data were collected. A Palliative Prognostic Score (PaP) was used to stratify patients according to their prognosis group. An analysis of the prescribed therapy was performed to quantify the \"potentially inappropriate medications\" (PIMs) and \"inappropriate medications\" (IMs), at admission and 24 hours prior to the patient\'s death. Results Over 140 patients were included. On the first day of hospitalization, 119 patients (85%) were exposed to at least one IM or PIM and 100 patients (71%) were still exposed to at least one IM or PIM in the last 24 hours of life. Regarding chemotherapy, 66 patients (47%) had treatment in the last two months of life, 38 (27%) in the last month, and 17 (12%) in the last two weeks prior to death. Therapeutic simplification (suspension of IMs and reduction of at least 50% of PIMs during hospitalization) was performed in 43% of the overall population and was higher in PaP score group C, but not statistically significant (p=0.09). The patient\'s inclusion in PaP score group C and inpatient consultation by the palliative care team were independent predictors of therapeutic simplification. Discussion There is an effort to achieve greater therapeutic suitability in palliative patients. However, many patients maintain futile and disproportionate therapy at the end of life (EoL). In many cases, systemic cancer treatment is performed until quite late in the course of the disease. The prescription of PIMs was significantly higher than that of IMs, which could be expected given their definition. A shorter life expectancy at admission led to a greater therapeutic simplification, as well as an intervention by the Palliative Care Team, which can be explained by the more focused approach towards quality-of-life improvement and symptomatic control. Different than expected the prescription of supportive therapies at hospital admission was not a predictor of therapeutic simplification. Although there was a reduction in IMs and PIMs in the studied population, and therapeutic simplification occurred in one fraction of the patients, the fact is that more than half of the patients evaluated did not undergo therapeutic simplification as defined in this work. Conclusion It appears that there is an effort to achieve greater therapeutic suitability in palliative patients, however, many patients maintain futile therapy at the EoL. It is of paramount importance to change the standard of care in this setting, to privilege a more patient-focused approach and tailored therapy, and to prioritize symptomatic control and quality-of-life improvement.

OBJECTIVE: With the emergence of Novel corona virus, hunt for finding a preventive and therapeutic treatment options has already begun at a rapid pace with faster clinical development programs. The present study was carried out to give an insight of therapeutic interventional trials registered under clinical trial registry of India (CTRI) for COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS: All trials registered under CTRI were evaluated using keyword \"COVID\" from its inception till 9th June 2020. Out of which, therapeutic interventional studies were chosen for further analysis. Following information was collected for each trial: type of therapeutic intervention (preventive/therapeutic), treatment given, no. of centers (single center/multicentric), type of institution (government/private), study design (randomized/single-blinded/double-blinded) and sponsors (Government/private). Microsoft Office Excel 2007 was used for tabulation and analysis.
RESULTS: The search yielded total of 205 trials, out of which, 127 (62%) trials were interventional trials. Out of these, 71 (56%) were AYUSH interventions, 36 (28.3%) tested drugs, 9 (7%) tested a nondrug intervention, rest were nutraceuticals and vaccines. About 66 (56%) were therapeutic trials. Majority were single-centered trials, i.e. 87 (73.7%). Trials were government funded in 57 (48.3%) studies. Majority were randomized controlled trials, i.e. 67 (56.8%). AYUSH preparations included AYUSH-64, Arsenic Album, SamshamaniVati etc.
CONCLUSIONS: The number of therapeutic interventional clinical trials was fair in India. A clear-cut need exists for an increase in both quantity and quality of clinical trials for COVID-19. Drug repurposing approach in all systems of medicine can facilitate prompt clinical decisions at lower costs than de novo drug development.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is a major cause of mortality in Russia. This study aimed to document the characteristics, clinical management, EGFR mutation status and outcomes of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) throughout the Russian Federation to inform future management decisions.
METHODS: This non-interventional, prospective cohort study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT01069835) was conducted at 33 sites across the Russian Federation. Patients with confirmed NSCLC were enrolled and followed for up to 12 months or until death. Investigators collected information on patient and disease characteristics, diagnosis and treatment patterns, clinical outcomes and adverse events (AEs). A logistic regression model was used to evaluate characteristics affecting tumor EGFR mutation status.
RESULTS: Data were analyzed from 838 patients. Most (78.4%) were male and Caucasian (98%), mean age was 58.7 years and 26.5% were never-smokers. Squamous-cell carcinoma (54.3%) was the most prevalent histology, followed by adenocarcinoma (31%). Most patients presented with advanced disease (23.7% with stage IIIA, 14.1% with stage IIIB, 25.4% with stage IV) and 10.1% of patients had EGFR-mutation-positive tumors. EGFR mutation was significantly associated with female gender, never smoking, age and adenocarcinoma histology. First- or second-line chemotherapy had been performed in 370 and 96 patients, respectively, and median progression-free survival was 35 and 19.4 weeks, respectively. For 813 patients, 194 AEs were reported at visit 1. A median of two AEs was reported for patients who had at least one AE. Study limitations include potential site selection bias, short observation period, small sample size and inclusion of fewer than average stage III-IV patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to a better understanding of prognostic and predictive factors of NSCLC in the Russian Federation, which will enable optimal treatment selection in future clinical practice. Epidemiology of EGFR mutations in this NSCLC cohort was similar to other studies of NSCLC in Caucasian populations.

There is a need for a better understanding of psychological processes when appearance is changed dramatically through surgery. The aim of this article is to shed light on how complex the process of changing appearance can be, and highlight the importance of including a psychological perspective to the treatment offered to children and adolescents with a visible condition affecting appearance. In order to illustrate some psychological aspects involved in a change of appearance, the case study of a young woman born with a cleft palate is presented. Through orthognathic surgery, an operation that changes the relationship and position of the upper and lower jaw, this young woman experienced a dramatic change in appearance. As a result of a new attractive appearance, she experienced new and different social interactions, which challenged her in surprising ways. Unexpectedly, an unknown past of childhood sexual abuse was triggered by romantic experiences due to her new appearance, and she developed signs of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression. This article presents central themes from the therapy and clinical interventions, which were mainly based on a solution-oriented and cognitive framework, and considers how the change of appearance affected the way this young woman behaved, felt and thought about herself after the surgery. Clinical implications of the case are discussed and their relevance to another research field - dramatic weight loss among those suffering from obesity - is suggested.

The aim of this research study was to examine the impact of the provision of a lifelike baby doll as a therapeutic tool on the behaviour of a person living with dementia. Specifically, this single case study assessed the potential benefits, if any, of the use of doll therapy in reducing behaviours of concern such as anxiety and agitation that may be associated with observed attachment needs of a person living with dementia.
METHODS: A single case study of a female participant, with moderately advanced Alzheimer\'s disease, was the subject of this research. The case study used both qualitative and quantitative research design and methodology in data collection and analysis.
RESULTS: Demonstrated that doll therapy was a positive intervention for the person living with dementia who was the participant in this research. The findings indicate a reduction in behaviours of concern related to the need for attachment and a considerable decline in levels of anxiety and agitation. There was extensive ongoing improvement in social interaction and communication.
CONCLUSIONS: This research supports doll therapy as a therapeutic intervention that may be utilized within the ongoing care of some persons with dementia to meet needs for attachment and to reduce behaviours of concern. Despite some controversy on this topic, doll therapy should be considered as a therapeutic approach to further dementia care in light of this positive outcome.