Theoretical Domains Framework

理论领域框架
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:作为提高医疗质量的一种机制,患者报告结果测量(PROM)得到了广泛的支持。我们旨在绘制出影响日常临床实践中PROM实施策略的关键促成因素和障碍。
    方法:进行了一项总括性审查,以确定从2000年1月至2023年6月在常规临床实践中探索与PROM整合相关的促成因素和障碍的审查。根据理论领域框架,以主题方式提取和总结了有关关键推动者和障碍的信息。
    结果:34条评论符合我们的纳入标准。确定的评论强调了障碍,例如临床医生和患者对PROM的认识有限,临床医生和患者感知到的低价值,对患者来说过于复杂或难以完成的PROM,PROM系统的可用性差,PROM数据的延迟反馈,临床医生担心使用PROM作为绩效管理工具,患者对隐私和安全的担忧,和资源约束。促进者包括分阶段实施,专业培训,实施前的利益相关者参与,明确的战略和目标,“更改冠军”以支持PROM实施,系统来回应由PROM提出的问题,并融入患者路径。没有共识赞成纸质或电子项目,然而,提供两种选择来减轻数字素养偏见和将PROM集成到电子健康记录中成为重要的促进者。
    结论:PROM的可持续实施是一个复杂的过程,需要涵盖培训和指导的多部分组织战略,必要的时间和资源,角色和责任,并咨询患者和临床医生。
    OBJECTIVE: Patient-report outcome measures (PROMs) have gained widespread support as a mechanism to improve healthcare quality. We aimed to map out key enablers and barriers influencing PROMs implementation strategies in routine clinical practice.
    METHODS: An umbrella review was conducted to identify reviews exploring enablers and barriers related to the integration of PROMs in routine clinical practice from January 2000 to June 2023. Information on key enablers and barriers was extracted and summarised thematically according to the Theoretical Domains Framework.
    RESULTS: 34 reviews met our criteria for inclusion. Identified reviews highlighted barriers such as limited PROMs awareness among clinicians and patients, perceived low value by clinicians and patients, PROMs that were too complex or difficult for patients to complete, poor usability of PROMs systems, delayed feedback of PROMs data, clinician concerns related to use of PROMs as a performance management tool, patient concerns regarding privacy and security, and resource constraints. Enablers encompassed phased implementation, professional training, stakeholder engagement prior to implementation, clear strategies and goals, \'change champions\' to support PROMs implementation, systems to respond to issues raised by PROMs, and integration into patient pathways. No consensus favoured paper or electronic PROMs, yet offering both options to mitigate digital literacy bias and integrating PROMs into electronic health records emerged as important facilitators.
    CONCLUSIONS: The sustainable implementation of PROMs is a complex process that requires multicomponent organisational strategies covering training and guidance, necessary time and resources, roles and responsibilities, and consultation with patients and clinicians.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在英国,生活在弱势社区的人们比社会经济地位较高的人更不可能拥有健康的饮食。为了解决这种不平等,这是至关重要的科学家,从业者和政策制定者了解阻碍和帮助这些人选择健康食物的因素。在这次范围审查中,我们的目标是确定生活在英国的弱势群体中健康饮食的障碍和促进因素.此外,我们使用理论域框架(TDF)来综合结果,并为开发基于理论的行为改变干预措施提供指导。搜索了五个数据库,(CINAHL,Embase,MEDLINE,PsycINFO,和WebofScience)的文章评估了生活在英国的弱势成年人的健康饮食摄入量。这篇综述共包括50篇论文(34篇定量论文;16篇定性论文)。在所有研究中,我们确定了78个障碍和49个促进因素,它们阻碍和/或鼓励健康饮食。障碍和促进者更通常被归类为环境,上下文和资源TDF域,74%的研究评估了至少一个与该领域相关的因素。因此,结果表明,与环境相关的因素,如高成本和健康食品的可及性,而不是个人因素,例如缺乏健康生活方式的效率导致英国弱势群体的不健康饮食。我们讨论了当前干预措施中如何在很大程度上忽略了这些因素,并建议应更多地努力实施专门针对基础设施而不是个人的干预措施。
    In the UK people living in disadvantaged communities are less likely than those with higher socio-economic status to have a healthy diet. To address this inequality, it is crucial scientists, practitioners and policy makers understand the factors that hinder and assist healthy food choice in these individuals. In this scoping review, we aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to healthy eating among disadvantaged individuals living in the UK. Additionally, we used the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to synthesise results and provide a guide for the development of theory-informed behaviour change interventions. Five databases were searched, (CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science) for articles assessing healthy dietary intake of disadvantaged adults living in the UK. A total of 50 papers (34 quantitative; 16 qualitative) were included in this review. Across all studies we identified 78 barriers and 49 facilitators found to either impede and/or encourage healthy eating. Both barriers and facilitators were more commonly classified under the Environmental, Context and Resources TDF domain, with 74% of studies assessing at least one factor pertaining to this domain. Results thus indicate that context related factors such as high cost and accessibility of healthy food, rather than personal factors, such as lack of efficiency in healthy lifestyle drive unhealthy eating in disadvantaged individuals in the UK. We discuss how such factors are largely overlooked in current interventions and propose that more effort should be directed towards implementing interventions that specifically target infrastructures rather than individuals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:运动有可能降低肾移植受者对合并症和心血管疾病的易感性。然而,与普通人群相比,肾移植受者的运动水平较低,促使对该移植队列中运动的障碍和推动者进行调查。
    目的:本系统综述旨在探索和绘制肾移植受者运动的障碍和促进因素。
    方法:系统检索了7个电子数据库。对主题进行合成,然后使用理论域框架进行演绎分类。
    结果:11项研究纳入本综述。通常报道的运动障碍是缺乏运动指导(n=9项研究),身体限制(n=5项研究)和害怕伤害肾脏(n=7项研究)。催育者希望恢复正常(n=5项研究),身体和心理益处(n=3项研究),目标设定和跟踪改进(n=3项研究)。在地方一级,肾移植受者发现的障碍是缺乏知识,害怕伤害肾脏,恶劣的天气和身体的限制。感知推动者已经过着积极的生活方式,精神上的好处,锻炼偏好和社会支持。
    结论:这项研究的主要发现是对有关类型和强度的特定/明确运动信息的需求增加,以及对肾移植受者移植后的个性化指导和支持。这些发现可用于为肾移植受者及其当地社区和更高层次的医疗保健专业人员开发运动资源和干预措施。
    BACKGROUND: Exercise has the potential to reduce the susceptibility to comorbidity and cardiovascular disease in kidney transplant recipients. However, kidney transplant recipients report lower levels of exercise compared to the general population, prompting an investigation into the barriers and enablers to exercise in this transplant cohort.
    OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to explore and map the barriers and enablers to exercise in kidney transplant recipients.
    METHODS: Seven electronic databases were systematically searched. Themes were synthesised and then deductively categorised using the Theoretical Domains Framework.
    RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in the review. Commonly reported barriers to exercise were lack of exercise guidance (n = 9 studies), physical limitations (n = 5 studies) and a fear of harming the kidney (n = 7 studies). Enablers were a desire to return to normality (n = 5 studies), physical and mental benefits (n = 3 studies), goal setting and tracking improvements (n = 3 studies). At the local level, barriers identified by kidney transplant recipients were a lack of knowledge, fear of injuring the kidney, bad weather and physical limitations. Perceived enablers were already living an active lifestyle, mental benefits, exercise preferences and social support.
    CONCLUSIONS: Key findings of this research were an increased demand for specific/explicit exercise information regarding type and intensity, and personalised guidance and support for kidney transplant recipients after transplantation. These findings can be used to inform the development of exercise resources and interventions for kidney transplant recipients and their health care professionals within the local community and at a greater level.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:虽然在不孕症的管理中优化生活方式(饮食和身体活动)行为具有公认的作用,最佳实践仍然未知,影响不孕症患者生活方式的因素也没有得到很好的理解。
    目的:本系统综述评估了不孕症患者健康生活方式的障碍和促成因素,从不孕症患者和健康专业人士的角度来看,以告知最佳的行为改变策略。
    方法:OvidMEDLINE(R),PsycINFO,EMBASE,EBM评论,和CINAHL从开始到2023年8月28日进行了搜索。合格的研究是定性和定量的主要研究,探讨了不孕症管理生活方式的障碍和/或推动者。质量评估是使用循证管理中心关键评估调查工具和关键评估技能计划定性清单进行的。数据通过主题分析进行分析,主题映射到能力,机会,动机和行为(COM-B)模型和理论域框架(TDF)。
    结果:在筛选12.326摘要和99篇全文后,纳入27项研究(12项定量,6种定性方法和9种混合方法),对22例不孕症女性进行了研究(n=2524),11项男性不育研究(n=1407),和6项卫生专业人员的研究(n=372)。我们确定了与能力相关的障碍和促成因素(例如行为改变策略),机会(例如,有限的时间,资源,和金钱),和动机(例如生活方式和情绪状态之间的相互作用)。根据确定的主题,建议将干预措施纳入不孕症的生活方式管理,包括促进自我管理技能的发展,以支持生活方式的改变(例如自我监测,行动计划,和目标设定)并纳入心理健康策略(例如,提供有关健康生活方式行为对心理健康的益处的信息,并鼓励患者将健康生活方式行为重新构建为自我护理策略)。
    结论:研究结果确定了影响不孕症患者生活方式管理的重要因素,并提出了设计干预措施时要考虑的相关干预因素。鉴于定性研究的缺乏,需要更多的研究来进一步了解在生育过程中塑造生活方式的复杂和相互作用的因素。
    BACKGROUND: While there is a recognized role of optimizing lifestyle (diet and physical activity) behaviours in the management of infertility, the best practice remains unknown and factors influencing the lifestyle of people with infertility are not well understood.
    OBJECTIVE: This systematic review evaluated barriers and enablers to a healthy lifestyle in people with infertility, from the perspectives of people with infertility and health professionals, in order to inform optimal behavioural change strategies.
    METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE(R), PsycINFO, EMBASE, EBM Reviews, and CINAHL were searched from inception to 28 August 2023. Eligible studies were qualitative and quantitative primary studies that explored barriers and/or enablers to lifestyle for infertility management. Quality assessment was performed using the Centre for Evidence-Based Management Critical Appraisal of a Survey Tool and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Checklist. Data were analysed by thematic analysis with themes mapped to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).
    RESULTS: After screening 12 326 abstracts and 99 full-texts, 27 studies were included (12 quantitative, 6 qualitative and 9 mixed-methods) with 22 studies of women with infertility (n = 2524), 11 studies of men with infertility (n = 1407), and 6 studies of health professionals (n = 372). We identified barriers and enablers relating to capability (e.g. strategies for behaviour change), opportunity (e.g. limited time, resources, and money), and motivation (e.g. interplay between lifestyle and emotional state). Based on the identified themes, suggested intervention components to integrate into lifestyle management of infertility include facilitating development of self-management skills to support lifestyle change (e.g. self-monitoring, action planning, and goal setting) and incorporating mental health strategies (e.g. providing information about the benefits of healthy lifestyle behaviours for mental health and encouraging patients to reframe healthy lifestyle behaviours as self-care strategies).
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings have identified important factors that influence lifestyle management in people with infertility and have suggested relevant intervention components to consider when designing interventions. Given the paucity of qualitative studies identified, more research is needed to further understand the complex and interacting factors that shape lifestyle during the fertility journey.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暴露疗法(ET)是焦虑相关表现(包括焦虑症)的有效心理治疗的重要组成部分,强迫症(强迫症),和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),并且在临床实践中经常未得到充分利用。使用理论域框架(TDF),本系统综述综合了现有关于焦虑相关表现的ET实施决定因素的文献,并研究了表现和发育亚组之间的差异.使用混合方法评估工具评估了52项符合条件的研究,将389个结果(99%)映射到TDF上。结果表明,临床医生对ET后果的负面信念通常与实施减少有关。似乎还发现,虽然广泛的未指定ET培训可能与改善焦虑症的实施有关;复杂演示文稿的更大实施(即,PTSD)可能需要更专业的培训,涉及实际组件。域的子集(例如,社会/职业角色和身份)占大多数结果,而有些仍未开发(即,乐观;强化;记忆,注意,和决策过程)或开发不足(即,行为调节)。同样,特定的演示文稿和发育亚组(即,PTSD和成年人)在文献中的结果比例高于其他文献(即,强迫症和青年)。探索ET实施的未来研究,在特定的演讲和发展亚组中,将受益于整合实施科学框架,以指导有针对性的发展,缩小ET治疗焦虑相关表现的研究与实践差距的综合策略。
    Exposure therapy (ET) forms a vital part of effective psychotherapy for anxiety-related presentations including anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and is often underutilised in clinical practice. Using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), this systematic review synthesised existing literature on the determinants of ET implementation for anxiety-related presentations and examined differences across presentations and developmental subgroups. Fifty-two eligible studies were assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, with 389 results (99%) mapped onto the TDF. Results suggested that clinicians\' negative beliefs about the consequences of ET were commonly associated with reduced implementation. It also appeared that whilst broad unspecified ET training may be related to improved implementation for anxiety disorders; greater implementation for complex presentations (i.e., PTSD) likely requires more specialised training involving practical components. A subset of domains (e.g., social/professional role and identity) accounted for most results, whilst some remain unexplored (i.e., optimism; reinforcement; memory, attention, and decision processes) or underexplored (i.e., behavioural regulation). Likewise, specific presentations and developmental subgroups (i.e., PTSD and adults) represented a greater proportion of results in the literature than others (i.e., OCD and youth). Future research exploring ET implementation, across specific presentations and developmental subgroups, would benefit from integrating implementation science frameworks to guide the development of targeted, comprehensive strategies to close the research-practice gap of ET for the treatment of anxiety-related presentations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与一般人群相比,智障人士的健康状况较差,部分原因是初级保健机构难以获得预防性护理。有充分的证据表明,结构化的年度健康评估可以提高智障人士的护理质量,它们的使用已成为几个高收入国家的推荐政策。然而,摄取仍然很低。理论领域框架(TDF)为理解实施障碍提供了一个概念结构,并已有效地应用于其他高需求群体的健康评估实施情况。但不适合智力残疾的人。我们对文献进行了范围审查,使用TDF,确定影响初级保健从业人员的障碍和促进因素,作为常规初级保健实践的一部分,对智障人士实施年度健康评估。
    方法:本研究是根据JBI方法学方法进行范围审查的。搜索在Medline(OVID-SP)进行,Embase(OVID-SP),PsycINFO(OVID-SP),CINHAL(EBSCO),Scopus(Elsevier)和WebofScience(Clarivate)提供截至2023年5月的相关同行评审出版物。筛选,全文审阅和数据提取由两名独立审阅者完成.数据被提取并映射到TDF以识别相关的障碍和促进者。
    结果:搜索产生了1057种出版物,21人符合纳入标准。将数据映射到TDF,最常识别的领域是(A)环境背景和资源,(b)技能,(c)知识和(d)情感。影响实施的主要因素包括从业人员对健康评估及其已确定的益处缺乏认识;从业人员在为智障人士提供健康评估方面的培训和经验不足;提供健康评估的时间不足;以及从业人员倦怠。
    结论:使用基于理论的行为框架,我们的审查有助于理解作为智障人士常规护理的一部分,改善健康评估实施的障碍和促进因素.然而,显然需要进一步的定性研究,以检查初级保健从业人员对实施障碍和促进者的总体健康评估的看法,包括目前没有进行健康评估的从业者的意见。
    BACKGROUND: People with intellectual disability experience poorer health outcomes compared with the general population, partly due to the difficulties of accessing preventive care in primary care settings. There is good evidence that structured annual health assessments can enhance quality of care for people with intellectual disability, and their use has become recommended policy in several high-income countries. However, uptake remains low. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) offers a conceptual structure for understanding barriers to implementation and has been usefully applied to inform implementation of health assessments for other high-need groups, but not for people with intellectual disability. We conducted a scoping review of the literature, using the TDF, to identify barriers and facilitators influencing primary care practitioners\' implementation of annual health assessments for people with intellectual disability as part of routine primary care practice.
    METHODS: This study was conducted according to the JBI methodological approach for scoping reviews. Searches were conducted in Medline (OVID-SP), Embase (OVID-SP), PsycINFO (OVID-SP), CINHAL (EBSCO), Scopus (Elsevier) and Web of Science (Clarivate) for relevant peer-reviewed publications up to May 2023. Screening, full-text review and data extraction were completed by two independent reviewers. Data were extracted and mapped to the TDF to identify relevant barriers and facilitators.
    RESULTS: The search yielded 1057 publications, with 21 meeting the inclusion criteria. Mapping data to the TDF, the most frequently identified domains were (a) environmental context and resources, (b) skills, (c) knowledge and (d) emotion. Predominant factors impacting on implementation included practitioners\' lack of awareness about health assessments and their identified benefits; inadequate training and experience by practitioners in the delivery of health assessments for people with intellectual disability; insufficient time to provide health assessments; and practitioner burnout.
    CONCLUSIONS: Using a theory-informed behavioural framework, our review aids understanding of the barriers and facilitators to improving the implementation of health assessments as part of routine care for people with intellectual disability. However, there is a clear need for further qualitative research to examine the perceptions of primary care practitioners regarding implementation barriers and facilitators to health assessments in general, including views from practitioners who are not currently undertaking health assessments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    糖尿病是一个日益严重的全球健康问题。国际准则建议识别,筛选,和转诊行为计划为那些有发展为2型糖尿病的高风险。糖尿病预防计划(DPPs)可以预防高危人群的2型糖尿病,然而,许多合格的参与者没有被推荐到这些方案。医疗保健工作者(HCWs)对于转诊和招聘流程至关重要。本研究旨在确定,从HCW的角度评估和综合有关转介和招募DPP的障碍和促进者的证据。
    “最适合”框架综合方法将综合定性,定量,以及影响HCW转介和招募DPP的因素的混合方法证据,以理论域框架(TDF)为先验框架。MEDLINE,EMBASE,CINAHL,心理信息,将搜索WebofScience和Scopus以英语发表的主要研究。出版年份将限于过去26年(1997-2023年)。质量将使用混合方法评估工具进行评估。使用TDF的演绎编码和不适合TDF的数据的归纳编码的混合将被合成为表示整个数据集的主题。将探索最终主题集之间的关系,以创建一个新的模型,以了解HCWs在推荐和招募DPP方面的观点。将对该概念模型进行敏感性分析。将使用GRADE-CERQual方法评估对综合发现的信心。一位作者将筛选,Extract,评估文献,而第二作者将在每个阶段独立验证20%的样本。
    参与DPP是方案影响的关键。HCW通常会识别有风险的人,并将其转介给DPP。了解HCWs对转诊和招聘的障碍和促进者的看法将为未来DPPs的实施提供信息。
    UNASSIGNED: Diabetes is a growing global health problem. International guidelines recommend identification, screening, and referral to behavioural programmes for those at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Diabetes prevention programmes (DPPs) can prevent type 2 diabetes in those at high risk, however many eligible participants are not referred to these programmes. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are pivotal to the referral and recruitment processes. This study aims to identify, appraise and synthesise the evidence on barriers and facilitators to referral and recruitment to DPPs from the perspective of HCWs.
    UNASSIGNED: A \"best fit\" framework synthesis method will synthesise qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods evidence on factors that affect HCWs referral and recruitment to DPPs, with the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) as the a priori framework. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Web of Science and Scopus will be searched for primary studies published in English. Year of publication will be restricted to the last 26 years (1997-2023). Quality will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A mix of deductive coding using the TDF and inductive coding of data that does not fit the TDF will be synthesised into themes representing the whole dataset. The relationships between the final set of themes will be explored to create a new model to understand HCWs\' perspectives on referral and recruitment to DPPs. Sensitivity analysis will be carried out on this conceptual model. Confidence in the synthesised findings will be assessed using the GRADE-CERQual approach. One author will screen, extract, appraise the literature while a second author will independently verify a 20% sample at each stage.
    UNASSIGNED: Participation in DPPs is key for programme impact. HCWs typically identify those at risk and refer them to DPPs. Understanding HCWs\' perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to referral and recruitment will inform future implementation of DPPs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    There is significant variability in intraoperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion practice. We aimed to use the theoretical domains framework (TDF) to categorize nonclinical and behavioural factors driving intraoperative RBC transfusion practice in a systematic review of the literature.
    We searched electronic databases from inception until August 2021 to identify studies evaluating nonclinical factors affecting intraoperative RBC transfusion. Using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, we assessed the quality of included studies and identified relevant nonclinical factors, which were coded into TDF domains by two independent reviewers using NVivo (Lumivero, QSR International, Burlington, MA, USA). We identified common themes within domains and sorted domains based on the frequency of reported factors.
    Our systematic review identified 18 studies: nine retrospective cohort studies, six cross-sectional surveys, and three before-and-after studies. Factors related to the social influences, behavioural regulation, environmental context/resources, and beliefs about consequences domains of the TDF were the most reported factors. Key factors underlying the observed variability in transfusion practice included the social effects of peers, patients, and institutional culture on decision-making (social influences), and characteristics of the practice environment including case volume, geographic location, and case start time (environmental context/resources). Studies reported variable beliefs about the consequences of both intraoperative transfusion and anemia (beliefs about consequences). Provider- and institutional-level audits, educational sessions, and increased communication between surgeons/anesthesiologists were identified as strategies to optimize intraoperative transfusion decision-making (behavioural regulation).
    Our systematic review has synthesized the literature on nonclinical and behavioural factors impacting intraoperative transfusion decision-making, categorized using the TDF. These findings can inform evidence-based interventions to reduce intraoperative RBC transfusion variability.
    Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/pm8zs/?view_only=166299ed28964804b9360c429b1218c1 ; first posted, 3 August 2022).
    RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Il existe une variabilité importante dans les pratiques de transfusion peropératoire de culots sanguins. Nous avons cherché à utiliser le cadre des domaines théoriques (TDF, pour theoretical domains framework) pour catégoriser les facteurs non cliniques et comportementaux motivant les pratiques de transfusion peropératoire de culots sanguins dans une revue systématique de la littérature.
    Nous avons réalisé des recherches dans les bases de données électroniques de leur création jusqu’en août 2021 pour identifier les études évaluant les facteurs non cliniques affectant la transfusion peropératoire de culots sanguins. À l’aide de l’outil d’évaluation des méthodes mixtes, nous avons évalué la qualité des études incluses et identifié les facteurs non cliniques pertinents, qui ont été codés dans les domaines TDF par deux personnes les révisant de manière indépendante utilisant NVivo (Lumivero, QSR International, Burlington, MA, États-Unis). Nous avons identifié des thèmes communs au sein des domaines et trié les domaines en fonction de la fréquence des facteurs signalés.
    Notre revue systématique a identifié 18 études : neuf études de cohorte rétrospectives, six sondages transversaux et trois études avant-après. Les facteurs liés aux influences sociales, à la régulation comportementale, au contexte et aux ressources environnementaux et les croyances concernant les domaines de conséquences du TDF étaient les facteurs les plus rapportés. Les principaux facteurs sous-jacents à la variabilité observée dans la pratique transfusionnelle comprenaient les effets sociaux des pairs, de la patientèle et de la culture de l’établissement sur la prise de décision (influences sociales) et les caractéristiques de l’environnement de pratique, y compris le volume de cas, l’emplacement géographique et l’heure de début des cas (contexte/ressources environnementaux). Des études ont fait état de croyances variables sur les conséquences de la transfusion peropératoire et de l’anémie (croyances sur les conséquences). Des vérifications au niveau des prestataires et des établissements, des séances de formation et une communication accrue entre les chirurgien·nes et les anesthésiologistes ont été identifiées comme des stratégies pouvant optimiser la prise de décision transfusionnelle peropératoire (régulation comportementale).
    Notre revue systématique a synthétisé la littérature sur les facteurs non cliniques et comportementaux ayant une incidence sur la prise de décision transfusionnelle peropératoire, classés à l’aide du TDF. Ces résultats peuvent éclairer les interventions fondées sur des données probantes pour réduire la variabilité de transfusion peropératoire de culots sanguins. ENREGISTREMENT DE L’éTUDE: Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/pm8zs/?view_only=166299ed28964804b9360c429b1218c1 ; soumis pour la première fois, 3 août 2022).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    身体活动和运动可以限制帕金森病中肌肉减少症的发展。这篇综述旨在评估行为改变(BC)干预对帕金森病患者运动自我效能和依从性的潜在影响。我们搜索了9个数据库,包括随机和非随机研究报告运动自我效能感,生活质量(QoL),身体功能和/或运动依从性。两名审稿人独立筛选,提取的数据,并评估证据的偏倚和确定性风险。干预措施被映射到理论领域框架。包括11项研究(n=901)。四项是随机试验,偏倚风险是混合的。大多数干预措施是多组分的,包括教育,行为技术,和支持团体。最有效的领域似乎是行为调节,对能力的信念,社会影响,强化和目标。未来的研究应该检查包含五个最有效的TDF域的多组分BC干预措施。
    Physical activity and exercise can limit the development of sarcopenia in Parkinson\'s Disease. This review aims to evaluate the potential effects of behavioural change (BC) interventions on exercise self-efficacy and adherence in people with Parkinson\'s. We searched nine databases and included randomised and non-randomised studies reporting exercise self-efficacy, quality of life (QoL), physical function and/or exercise adherence. Two reviewers independently screened, data extracted, and assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence. The interventions were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Eleven studies (n=901) were included. Four were randomised trials and risk of bias was mixed. Most interventions were multi-component, including education, behavioural techniques, and support groups. The most effective domains appear to be Behavioural regulation, Belief about Capabilities, Social influences, Reinforcement and Goals. Future research should examine multi-component BC interventions encompassing the five most effective TDF domains.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:已证明坚持varenicline可以显着提高成功戒烟的机会,研究表明,6个月的戒烟率增加了两倍。然而,尽管它有潜在的好处,许多人努力保持良好的varenicline;因此有必要制定可扩展的策略来帮助人们坚持。作为制定干预措施以提高对伐尼克兰的依从性的第一步,我们进行了快速的文献综述,以确定:1)伐尼克兰依从性的可修改的障碍和促进因素,和2)与增加对伐尼克兰的依从性相关的行为改变技术。
    方法:我们搜索了MEDLINE,Embase,APAPsycINFO,CINAHL,以及2006年至2022年间发表的相关研究的Cochrane中央对照试验登记册。搜索词包括“varenicline,\"\"戒烟,“和”坚持,“及其各自的主题词和同义词。我们筛选并纳入报告可修改的伐尼克兰依从性决定因素的研究,然后评估质量,提取可修改的决定因素,并将它们映射到理论域框架版本2和行为改变技术分类版本1。
    结果:通过数据库搜索确定了1,221个标题;61个符合资格标准。大多数研究是随机对照试验,主要集中在伐尼克兰的障碍上。只有9项研究明确提到了用于帮助伐尼克兰依从性的行为改变技术。八个领域被确定为伐尼克兰依从性的障碍(行为调节,记忆,目标,意图,关于能力的信念,关于后果的信念,乐观/悲观,和环境背景)和五个作为促进者(知识,行为调节,关于能力的信念,社会影响,和环境背景)。
    结论:本研究确定了在根据药物依从性的可修改决定因素制定针对患者需求的复杂依从性干预措施时应解决的障碍和促进因素。其中一些未被现有的依从性干预措施充分利用。这项审查的结果将为基于理论的健康机器人的设计提供信息,该机器人计划改善接受戒烟治疗的人的伐尼克兰依从性。
    背景:本研究注册于PROSPERO(#CRD42022321838)。
    BACKGROUND: Adhering to varenicline has been shown to significantly improve the chances of successfully quitting smoking, with studies indicating a twofold increase in 6-month quit rates. However, despite its potential benefits, many individuals struggle with maintaining good adherence to varenicline; thus there is a need to develop scalable strategies to help people adhere. As a first step to inform the development of an intervention to improve adherence to varenicline, we conducted a rapid literature review to identify: 1) modifiable barriers and facilitators to varenicline adherence, and 2) behaviour change techniques associated with increased adherence to varenicline.
    METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant studies published between 2006 and 2022. Search terms included \"varenicline,\" \"smoking cessation,\" and \"adherence,\" and their respective subject headings and synonyms. We screened and included studies reporting modifiable determinants of adherence to varenicline and then assessed quality, extracted modifiable determinants and mapped them to the Theoretical Domains Framework version 2 and the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy version 1.
    RESULTS: A total of 1,221 titles were identified through the database searches; 61 met the eligibility criteria. Most of the studies were randomized controlled trials and predominantly focused on barriers to varenicline. Only nine studies explicitly mentioned behaviour change techniques used to help varenicline adherence. Eight domains were identified as barriers to varenicline adherence (behavioural regulation, memory, goals, intentions, beliefs about capabilities, beliefs about consequences, optimism/pessimism, and environmental context) and five as facilitators (knowledge, behavioural regulation, beliefs about capabilities, social influences, and environmental context).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies barriers and facilitators that should be addressed when developing a complex adherence intervention tailored to patients\' needs based on modifiable determinants of medication adherence, some of which are under- used by existing adherence interventions. The findings from this review will inform the design of a theory-based healthbot planned to improve varenicline adherence in people undergoing smoking cessation treatment.
    BACKGROUND: This study was registered with PROSPERO (# CRD42022321838).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号