UNASSIGNED: The U.S. antibiotic market failure has threatened future innovation and supply. Understanding when and why clinicians underutilize recently approved gram-negative antibiotics might help prioritize the patient in future antibiotic development and potential market entry rewards.
UNASSIGNED: To determine use patterns of recently U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved gram-negative antibiotics (ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, plazomicin, eravacycline, imipenem-relebactam-cilastatin, and cefiderocol) and identify factors associated with their preferential use (over traditional generic agents) in patients with gram-negative infections due to pathogens displaying difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR; that is, resistance to all first-line antibiotics).
UNASSIGNED: Retrospective cohort.
UNASSIGNED: 619 U.S. hospitals.
UNASSIGNED: Adult inpatients.
UNASSIGNED: Quarterly percentage change in antibiotic use was calculated using weighted linear regression. Machine learning selected candidate variables, and mixed models identified factors associated with new (vs. traditional) antibiotic use in DTR infections.
UNASSIGNED: Between quarter 1 of 2016 and quarter 2 of 2021, ceftolozane-tazobactam (approved 2014) and ceftazidime-avibactam (2015) predominated new antibiotic usage whereas subsequently approved gram-negative antibiotics saw relatively sluggish uptake. Among gram-negative infection hospitalizations, 0.7% (2551 [2631 episodes] of 362 142) displayed DTR pathogens. Patients were treated exclusively using traditional agents in 1091 of 2631 DTR episodes (41.5%), including \"reserve\" antibiotics such as polymyxins, aminoglycosides, and tigecycline in 865 of 1091 episodes (79.3%). Patients with bacteremia and chronic diseases had greater adjusted probabilities and those with do-not-resuscitate status, acute liver failure, and Acinetobacter baumannii complex and other nonpseudomonal nonfermenter pathogens had lower adjusted probabilities of receiving newer (vs. traditional) antibiotics for DTR infections, respectively. Availability of susceptibility testing for new antibiotics increased probability of usage.
UNASSIGNED: Residual confounding.
UNASSIGNED: Despite FDA approval of 7 next-generation gram-negative antibiotics between 2014 and 2019, clinicians still frequently treat resistant gram-negative infections with older, generic antibiotics with suboptimal safety-efficacy profiles. Future antibiotics with innovative mechanisms targeting untapped pathogen niches, widely available susceptibility testing, and evidence demonstrating improved outcomes in resistant infections might enhance utilization.
UNASSIGNED: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; NIH Intramural Research Program.

Population pharmacokinetic (pop-PK) models constructed for model-informed precision dosing often have limited utility due to the low number of patients recruited. To augment such models, an approach is presented for generating fully artificial quasi-models which can be employed to make individual estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters. Based on 72 concentrations obtained in 12 patients, one- and two-compartment pop-PK models with or without creatinine clearance as a covariate were generated for piperacillin using the nonparametric adaptive grid algorithm. Thirty quasi-models were subsequently generated for each model type, and nonparametric maximum a posteriori probability Bayesian estimates were established for each patient. A significant difference in performance was found between one- and two-compartment models. Acceptable agreement was found between predicted and observed piperacillin concentrations, and between the estimates of the random-effect pharmacokinetic variables obtained using the so-called support points of the pop-PK models or the quasi-models as priors. The mean squared errors of the predictions made using the quasi-models were similar to, or even considerably lower than those obtained when employing the pop-PK models. Conclusion: fully artificial nonparametric quasi-models can efficiently augment pop-PK models containing few support points, to make individual pharmacokinetic estimates in the clinical setting.

Hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) are common healthcare-associated infections linked to high morbidity and mortality. Gram-negative pathogens, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, exhibit multidrug resistance and are recognized as major public health concerns, particularly among critically ill patients with HABP/VABP. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a novel combination antibacterial agent comprising ceftolozane (a potent antipseudomonal cephalosporin) and tazobactam (a β-lactamase inhibitor). Phase III trials have demonstrated non-inferiority of ceftolozane/tazobactam to comparators, leading to the approval of ceftolozane/tazobactam for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, complicated intra-abdominal infections, and nosocomial pneumonia. In this article, we review the clinical trial evidence and key real-world effectiveness data of ceftolozane/tazobactam for the treatment of serious healthcare-associated Gram-negative infections, focusing on patients with HABP/VABP.
Highlights from a review of ceftolozane/tazobactam for the treatment of serious infectionsSerious infections that can affect people in hospitals can cause serious illness or loss of life. Antibiotics are a type of medicine designed to kill the bacteria that cause these infections. However, bacteria have evolved over time, which means that antibiotics are not as effective at killing the bacteria and treating the infection. This is known as antibiotic resistance. To treat serious infections in hospital, there is a need for new antibiotics that can overcome this resistance and successfully fight off bacteria. This paper looks at an antibiotic known as ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), which can be used to treat people with serious infections that are picked up in hospitals. Clinical and laboratory studies have been reviewed to evaluate how effective, safe, and suitable C/T is for patients. The studies discussed in this paper highlight how well C/T works in people with serious infections, including those who are already ill and have been put on a ventilator to help with their breathing. Some of these studies showed that C/T worked well against lots of different types of bacteria that are known to cause serious infections in hospital and are linked to a high risk of death. Antibiotic resistance is a major problem all over the world. There is a need for effective antibiotics that can treat a range of infections caused by resistant bacteria. The results of this paper show that there is a lot of evidence to support the use of C/T in hospitals for people with serious bacterial infections.

Background This study was designed to evaluate the current in vitro susceptibility of clinical isolates to broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics. Methodology Bacterial isolates, cultured from 180 non-repetitive clinical samples between April and November 2022 at three hospitals in India, were used to evaluate the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics using the Epsilometer test (E-test) method. Test antibiotics were ceftriaxone and ceftriaxone in combination with β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) sulbactam and tazobactam. Comparator antibiotics included amoxicillin + BLI clavulanic acid, piperacillin + tazobactam, cefotaxime, and cefepime. The MIC values obtained were used to assess the susceptibility of the isolates and to compute the efficacy ratios (ERs) of the antibiotics. Results Among the 180 clinical isolates, ~89% were gram-negative bacteria, the most prevalent ones being Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Of the gram-negative isolates, ~37% were susceptible/intermediately susceptible to ceftriaxone, and ~29% were susceptible to ceftriaxone + BLIs. The test antibiotics had ER >10 against 85%-95% E. coli isolates, whereas comparator antibiotics had ER >10 against 31%-68% isolates. The differences between the test antibiotics and piperacillin + tazobactam or cefotaxime were statistically significant. Ceftriaxone, ceftriaxone + sulbactam, and ceftriaxone + tazobactam had ER >10 against 78%, 100%, and 90% of K. pneumoniae isolates, while the corresponding percentages for cefotaxime, piperacillin + tazobactam, and cefepime were 100%, 64%, and 80%, respectively. The difference between ceftriaxone + BLIs and piperacillin + tazobactam was statistically significant. Ceftriaxone + BLIs had ER >10 against all E. coli isolates producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs); the percentage of isolates was significantly higher than that for piperacillin + tazobactam. Ceftriaxone + tazobactam had ER >10 against all ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates; ceftriaxone and ceftriaxone + sulbactam had ER ranging 6-10. Conclusions Ceftriaxone and ceftriaxone in combination with sulbactam and tazobactam are promising antibiotics to explore against prevalent infectious microorganisms such as E. coli and K. pneumoniae. Ceftriaxone + tazobactam also holds promise against ESBL-producing variants.

OBJECTIVE: Knowledge on the tissue penetration of piperacillin-tazobactam in children with sepsis is lacking. In this study, the feasibility and performance of microdialysis experiments were explored in septic piglets and children as part of a translational research project.
METHODS: Multiple-day microdialysis investigations were performed in muscle tissue of 22 piglets (of which 11 were septic) and 6 children with sepsis. An in vitro experiment preceded the (pre)clinical trials to derive optimal experimental settings and calibration technique. Linear mixed-effects models quantified the impact of sepsis on relative recovery (RR) and intercatheter, interindividual, interoccasion, and residual variability.
RESULTS: In vivo microdialysis was well tolerated in piglets and children, with no significant adverse events reported. Using identical experimental settings, lower RR values were recorded in healthy and septic piglets (range: piperacillin, 17.2-29.1% and tazobactam, 23.5-29.1%) compared with the in vitro experiment (piperacillin, 43.3% and tazobactam, 55.3%), and there were unacceptably low values in children with sepsis (<10%). As a result, methodological changes were made in the pediatric trial. Realistic tissue concentration-time curves were derived in piglets and children. In piglets, sepsis reduced the RR. The greatest contributors to RR variability were residual (>40%) and interoccasion (>30%) variability. The internal standard method was the preferred calibration technique in both piglets and children.
CONCLUSIONS: Microdialysis is a safe and applicable method for the measurement of tissue drug concentrations in piglets and children. This study demonstrated the impact of experimental settings, sepsis, and target population on individual RR.

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T) and ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) are two novel antimicrobials that retain activity against resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The comparative effectiveness and safety of C-T versus CAZ-AVI remain unknown. A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was performed in six tertiary centers in Saudi Arabia and included patients who received either C-T or CAZ-AVI for infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa. Overall in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and clinical cure were the main study outcomes. Safety outcomes were also evaluated. A multivariate analysis using logistic regression was used to determine the independent impact of treatment on the main outcomes of interest. We enrolled 200 patients in the study (100 in each treatment arm). A total of 56% were in the intensive care unit, 48% were mechanically ventilated, and 37% were in septic shock. Approximately 19% of patients had bacteremia. Combination therapy was administered to 41% of the patients. The differences between the C-T and CAZ-AVI groups did not reach statistical significance in the overall in-hospital mortality (44% versus 37%; P = 0.314; OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.76 to 2.36), 30-day mortality (27% versus 23%; P = 0.514; OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.65 to 2.35), clinical cure (61% versus 66%; P = 0.463; OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.49), or acute kidney injury (23% versus 17%; P = 0.289; OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 0.69 to 3.14), even after adjusting for differences between the two groups. C-T and CAZ-AVI did not significantly differ in terms of safety and effectiveness, and they serve as potential options for the treatment of infections caused by MDR P. aeruginosa.

Evidence regarding acute kidney injury associated with concomitant administration of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam is conflicting, particularly in patients in the ICU.
Does a difference exist in the association between commonly prescribed empiric antibiotics on ICU admission (vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam, vancomycin and cefepime, and vancomycin and meropenem) and acute kidney injury?
This was a retrospective cohort study using data from the eICU Research Institute, which contains records for ICU stays between 2010 and 2015 across 335 hospitals. Patients were enrolled if they received vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam, vancomycin and cefepime, or vancomycin and meropenem exclusively. Patients initially admitted to the ED were included. Patients with hospital stay duration of < 1 h, receiving dialysis, or with missing data were excluded. Acute kidney injury was defined as Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stage 2 or 3 based on serum creatinine component. Propensity score matching was used to match patients in the control (vancomycin and meropenem or vancomycin and cefepime) and treatment (vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam) groups, and ORs were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to study the effect of longer courses of combination therapy and patients with renal insufficiency on admission.
Thirty-five thousand six hundred fifty-four patients met inclusion criteria (vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam, n = 27,459; vancomycin and cefepime, n = 6,371; vancomycin and meropenem, n = 1,824). Vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam was associated with a higher risk of acute kidney injury and initiation of dialysis when compared with that of both vancomycin and cefepime (Acute kidney injury: OR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.25-1.49]; dialysis: OR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.14-1.45]) and vancomycin and meropenem (Acute kidney injury: OR, 1.27 [95%, 1.06-1.52]; dialysis: OR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.23-2.00]). The odds of acute kidney injury developing was especially pronounced in patients without renal insufficiency receiving a longer duration of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam therapy compared with vancomycin and meropenem therapy.
VPT is associated with a higher risk of acute kidney injury than both vancomycin and cefepime and vancomycin and meropenem in patients in the ICU, especially for patients with normal initial kidney function requiring longer durations of therapy. Clinicians should consider vancomycin and meropenem or vancomycin and cefepime to reduce the risk of nephrotoxicity for patients in the ICU.

BACKGROUND: Ceftolozane/tazobactam, a cephalosporin-β-lactamase inhibitor combination, is approved for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI). The safety and efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam in pediatric participants with cIAI were assessed.
METHODS: This phase 2 study (NCT03217136) randomized participants to either ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole or meropenem for treatment of cIAI in pediatric participants (<18 years). The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of intravenous ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole. Clinical cure at end of treatment (EOT) and test of cure (TOC) visits were secondary end points.
RESULTS: The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population included 91 participants (ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole, n = 70; meropenem, n = 21). Complicated appendicitis was the most common diagnosis (93.4%); Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen (65.9%). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 80.0% and 61.9% of participants receiving ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole and meropenem, drug-related AEs occurred in 18.6% and 14.3% and serious AEs occurred in 11.4% and 0% of participants receiving ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole and meropenem, respectively. No drug-related serious AEs or discontinuations due to drug-related AEs occurred. Rates of the clinical cure for ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole and meropenem at EOT were 80.0% and 95.2% (difference: -14.3; 95% confidence interval: -26.67 to 4.93) and at TOC were 80.0% and 100.0% (difference: -19.1; 95% confidence interval: -30.18 to -2.89), respectively; 6 of the 14 clinical failures for ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole at TOC were indeterminate responses imputed as failures per protocol.
CONCLUSIONS: Ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole was well tolerated in pediatric participants with cIAI and had a safety profile similar to the established safety profile in adults. In this descriptive efficacy analysis, ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole appeared efficacious.

Implant-associated osteomyelitis is one of the most feared complications following orthopedic surgery. Although the risk is low, sufficient antibiotic protection of the implant surface is important. The aim of this study was to assess steady-state piperacillin concentrations in the proximity of an orthopedic implant. Time above the minimal inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC) was evaluated for MIC of 8 (low target) and 16 μg/mL (high target). Six female pigs received an intravenous bolus infusion of 4 g/0.5 g piperacillin/tazobactam over 30 min every 6 h. Steady state was assumed achieved in the third dosing interval (12-18 h). Microdialysis catheters were placed in a cannulated screw in the proximal tibial cancellous bone, in cancellous bone next to the screw, and in cancellous bone on the contralateral tibia. Dialysates were collected from time 12 to 18 h and plasma samples were collected as reference. For the low piperacillin target (8 µg/mL), comparable mean fT>MIC across all the investigated compartments (mean range: 54-74%) was found. For the high target (16 µg/mL), fT>MIC was shorter inside the cannulated screw (mean: 16%) than in the cancellous bone next to the screw and plasma (mean range: 49-54%), and similar between the two cancellous bone compartments. To reach more aggressive piperacillin fT>MIC targets in relation to the implant, alternative dosing regimens such as continuous infusion may be considered.

Ceftolozane/tazobactam (an antipseudomonal cephalosporin) in combination with a well-established β-lactamase inhibitor has not been approved to date in clinical practice in China. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in-vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparator agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with various resistance patterns. P. aeruginosa (n=2178) specimens were collected from multiple sources in seven geographic regions of China between 2016 and 2019. All isolates were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, and minimum inhibitory concentrations of various antimicrobial agents (ceftolozane/tazobactam, amikacin, tobramycin, ceftazidime, cefepime, colistin, levofloxacin, aztreonam, meropenem, imipenem and piperacillin/tazobactam) were determined using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute\'s broth microdilution method. P. aeruginosa demonstrated considerably high rates of multi-drug resistance (MDR, 57.3%), extensive drug resistance (XDR, 43.5%) and difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR, 16.8%). The overall susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to ceftolozane/tazobactam was 81.9%, and ceftolozane/tazobactam showed diverse activity against the three resistant subsets, ranging from 28.5% against DTR P. aeruginosa to 68.9% against MDR P. aeruginosa. P. aeruginosa, MDR P. aeruginosa, XDR P. aeruginosa and DTR P. aeruginosa derived from the East (Jiangzhe area) region maintained significantly lower susceptibility to ceftolozane/tazobactam compared with P. aeruginosa, MDR P. aeruginosa, XDR P. aeruginosa and DTR P. aeruginosa from other regions. The susceptibility rates of P. aeruginosa isolated from diverse sources to ceftolozane/tazobactam were similar to isolates from bloodstream infections, with the highest being 88.6%. Compared with other antimicrobial agents, ceftolozane/tazobactam was more active than the β-lactams tested but was slightly less active than amikacin. Amikacin demonstrated the best activity against P. aeruginosa and the three resistant subsets. Ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrated considerable in-vitro activity against P. aeruginosa, MDR P. aeruginosa, XDR P. aeruginosa and DTR P. aeruginosa, indicating that it could be an optional therapeutic agent against P. aeruginosa.