BACKGROUND: Novel β-lactams have in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), but their clinical performances and the selection criteria for practical use are still not clear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of novel β-lactams for PA infection in various sites and to compare the efficacy of each agent.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials that used novel β-lactams to treat PA infection. The primary outcomes were clinical cure and favorable microbiological response. Subgroup analyses were performed based on drug type, drug resistance of pathogens, and site of infection. Network meta-analysis was carried out within a Bayesian framework.
RESULTS: In all studies combined (16 randomized controlled trials), novel β-lactams indicated comparable performance to other treatment regimens in both outcome measures (relative risk = 1.04; 95% confidence interval 0.94-1.15; P = .43) (relative risk = 0.97; 95% confidence interval 0.81-1.17; P = .76). Subgroup analyses showed that the efficacy of ceftolozane-tazobactam (TOL-TAZ), ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, and cefiderocol had no apparent differences compared to control groups among different infection sites, drug types and drug resistance of PA. In network meta-analysis, the results showed no statistically significant differences between TOL-TAZ, CAZ-AVI, and cefiderocol.
CONCLUSIONS: TOL-TAZ, CAZ-AVI, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, and cefiderocol are not inferior to other agents in the treatment of PA infection. Their efficacy is also comparable between TOL-TAZ, CAZ-AVI, and cefiderocol.

Hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) are common healthcare-associated infections linked to high morbidity and mortality. Gram-negative pathogens, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, exhibit multidrug resistance and are recognized as major public health concerns, particularly among critically ill patients with HABP/VABP. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a novel combination antibacterial agent comprising ceftolozane (a potent antipseudomonal cephalosporin) and tazobactam (a β-lactamase inhibitor). Phase III trials have demonstrated non-inferiority of ceftolozane/tazobactam to comparators, leading to the approval of ceftolozane/tazobactam for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, complicated intra-abdominal infections, and nosocomial pneumonia. In this article, we review the clinical trial evidence and key real-world effectiveness data of ceftolozane/tazobactam for the treatment of serious healthcare-associated Gram-negative infections, focusing on patients with HABP/VABP.
Highlights from a review of ceftolozane/tazobactam for the treatment of serious infectionsSerious infections that can affect people in hospitals can cause serious illness or loss of life. Antibiotics are a type of medicine designed to kill the bacteria that cause these infections. However, bacteria have evolved over time, which means that antibiotics are not as effective at killing the bacteria and treating the infection. This is known as antibiotic resistance. To treat serious infections in hospital, there is a need for new antibiotics that can overcome this resistance and successfully fight off bacteria. This paper looks at an antibiotic known as ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), which can be used to treat people with serious infections that are picked up in hospitals. Clinical and laboratory studies have been reviewed to evaluate how effective, safe, and suitable C/T is for patients. The studies discussed in this paper highlight how well C/T works in people with serious infections, including those who are already ill and have been put on a ventilator to help with their breathing. Some of these studies showed that C/T worked well against lots of different types of bacteria that are known to cause serious infections in hospital and are linked to a high risk of death. Antibiotic resistance is a major problem all over the world. There is a need for effective antibiotics that can treat a range of infections caused by resistant bacteria. The results of this paper show that there is a lot of evidence to support the use of C/T in hospitals for people with serious bacterial infections.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-sparing antibiotics are needed urgently for patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs). Although several novel antibiotics - novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (e.g. ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam) and a novel tetracycline derivative (eravacycline) - have been developed for cIAIs, it remains unclear whether these antibiotics are comparable to carbapenems for the treatment of cIAIs.
METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted until 1 October 2022. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the clinical efficacy and safety of novel antibiotics against carbapenems for patients with cIAIs were included.
RESULTS: Among the 11 selected RCTs, no significant differences in clinical cure rate at the test-of-cure visit were observed between the study group and the control group on analysis of the clinically evaluable population [93.6% vs 93.7%, risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-1.01; P=0.84], microbiologically evaluable population (93.0% vs 94.5%, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.00; P=0.10) and modified intention-to-treat population (85.9% vs 87.7%, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.01; P=0.13). All findings were consistent across the subgroup analyses and sensitivity tests. Similarly, no significant difference in microbiological eradication was observed between the study group and the control group (87.8% vs 89.7%, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.01; P=0.18). The risk of adverse events was similar in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical efficacy, microbiological response and safety of the novel antibiotics, including ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam and eravacycline, are comparable to carbapenems for the treatment of patients with cIAIs. These agents can be potential therapeutic options as carbapenem-sparing antibiotics for cIAIs.

BACKGROUND: Which antimicrobial agents provide the optimal efficacy, safety, and tolerability for the empirical treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) remains unclear but is paramount in the context of evolving antimicrobial resistance. Therefore, updated meta-analyses on this issue are warranted.
METHODS: We systematically searched four major electronic databases from their inception through October 2022. Randomized controlled trials examining antimicrobial agents for cIAI treatment were included. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of included studies utilizing the Cochrane Collaboration\'s risk of bias tool as described in the updated version 1 of the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook and extracted data from all manuscripts according to a predetermined list of topics. All meta-analyses were conducted using R software. The primary outcome was clinical success rate in patients with cIAIs.
RESULTS: Forty-five active-controlled trials with low to medium methodological quality and involving 14,267 adults with cIAIs were included in the network meta-analyses. The vast majority of patients with an acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score < 10 had low risk of treatment failure or death. Twenty-one regimens were investigated. In the network meta-analyses, cefepime plus metronidazole was more effective than tigecycline and ceftolozane/tazobactam plus metronidazole (odds ratio [OR] = 1.96, 95% credibility interval [CrI] 1.05 ~ 3.79; OR = 3.09, 95% CrI 1.02 ~ 9.79, respectively). No statistically significant differences were found among antimicrobial agents regarding microbiological success rates. Cefepime plus metronidazole had lower risk of all-cause mortality than tigecycline (OR = 0.22, 95% CrI 0.05 ~ 0.85). Statistically significant trends were observed favoring cefotaxime plus metronidazole, which exhibited fewer discontinuations because of adverse events (AEs) when compared with eravacycline, meropenem and ceftolozane/tazobactam plus metronidazole (OR = 0.0, 95% CrI 0.0 ~ 0.8; OR = 0.0, 95% CrI 0.0 ~ 0.7; OR = 0.0, 95% CrI 0.0 ~ 0.64, respectively). Compared with tigecycline, eravacycline was associated with fewer discontinuations because of AEs (OR = 0.17, 95% CrI 0.03 ~ 0.81). Compared with meropenem, ceftazidime/avibactam plus metronidazole had a higher rate of discontinuation due to AEs (OR = 2.09, 95% CrI 1.0 ~ 4.41). In pairwise meta-analyses, compared with ceftriaxone plus metronidazole, ertapenem and moxifloxacin (one trial, OR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.06 ~ 3.50; one trial, OR = 4.24, 95% CI 1.18 ~ 15.28, respectively) were associated with significantly increased risks of serious AEs. Compared with imipenem/cilastatin, tigecycline (four trials, OR = 1.57, 95%CI 1.07 ~ 2.32) was associated with a significantly increased risk of serious AEs. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve, Cefepime plus metronidazole was more likely to be optimal among all treatments in terms of efficacy and safety, tigecycline was more likely to be worst regimen in terms of tolerability, and eravacycline was more likely to be best tolerated.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that cefepime plus metronidazole is optimal for empirical treatment of patients with cIAIs and that tigecycline should be prescribed cautiously considering the safety and tolerability concerns. However, it should be noted that data currently available on the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of antimicrobial agents pertain mostly to lower-risk patients with cIAIs.

Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a novel cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam in treating GNB infections in adult patients.
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were retrieved until August 2022. Randomized trials and non-randomized controlled studies evaluating ceftolozane-tazobactam and its comparators in adult patients with GNB infections were included.
A total of 13 studies were included. Overall, patients receiving ceftolozane-tazobactam had significant advantages in clinical cure (odds ratio [OR], 1.62; 95% CI, 1.05-2.51) and microbiological eradication (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.19-1.71), especially in Pseudomonas aeruginosa-infected patients. Ceftolozane-tazobactam had a significant advantage in clinical success or microbial eradication compared with polymyxin/aminoglycosides (PL/AG) or levofloxacin. There were no significant differences in adverse events (AEs), Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), and mortality between ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparators. Notably, ceftolozane-tazobactam showed a significantly lower risk of acute kidney injury compared with PL/AG.
Ceftolozane-tazobactam showed excellent clinical and microbiological efficacy in treating GNB, especially P. aeruginosa-induced infections. The overall safety profile of ceftolozane-tazobactam was comparable to other antimicrobials, with no increased risk of CDI and obvious advantage over antibacterial agents with high nephrotoxicity.

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSIs), or bacteremia, are responsible for considerable disease burden. Increasing rates of antibiotic resistance and delays in selection of appropriate treatment lead to increased morbidity, mortality, and costs. Due to limitations of current standard treatments, especially for bacteremia caused by resistant pathogens, a systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to understand the utilization of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) in bacteremia.
METHODS: Electronic database searches of EMBASE®, MEDLINE®, CCTR and Northern Lights, as well as hand searches of conference proceedings from the last two annual meetings (i.e., 2018, 2019) of the European Congress of Clinical Microbiological and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America\'s annual meeting (IDWeek) were conducted. A total of 23 studies reporting on patients with bacteremia receiving C/T were included in the review.
RESULTS: Most studies were observational (k = 20 studies), though few interventional studies were also identified (k = 3). Heterogeneity was ubiquitous with respect to source of bacteremia (i.e., primary or secondary), source of infection (for secondary bacteremia), pathogen type, antibiotic resistance, C/T dose, and outcome definitions. This heterogeneity, along with limited data, and small sample sizes (n = 1 to 31) made it difficult to draw any substantial conclusions, though overall results were favorable to C/T with respect to the outcomes of interest. Nineteen studies reported clinical cure or success (primary bacteremia: k = 6, reported range: 33.3% to 100%; secondary bacteremia: k = 8, 60% to 100%; mixed/unspecified bacteremia: k = 10, 50% to 91.7%). Eight studies reported microbiological cure or eradication rates (primary: k = 3, all reporting 100%; secondary: k = 4, 68% to 80%; mixed/unspecified: k = 5, 60% to 80%). Thirteen studies reported mortality (primary: k = 4, 0% to 14%; secondary: k = 7, 0% to 100%; or mixed/unspecified bacteremia: k = 7, 0% to 51.6%). One study each also reported composite clinical response, relapse, hospital re-admission, and hospital length of stay.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the available evidence and observed trends for C/T in bacteremia should be interpreted with caution, the direction of effect would support the utilization of C/T for these difficult to treat infections. Future research should supplement the existing evidence by considering the impact of key treatment effect modifiers without contributing to the observed heterogeneity.

OBJECTIVE: Timely and appropriate dosing of antibiotics is essential for the treatment of bacterial sepsis. Critically ill patients treated with continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) often have physiologic derangements that affect pharmacokinetics (PK) of antibiotics and dosing may be challenging. We sought to aggregate previously published piperacillin and tazobactam (pip-tazo) pharmacokinetic data in critically ill patients undergoing CKRT to better understand pharmacokinetics of pip-tazo in this population and better inform dosing.
METHODS: The National Library of Medicine Database was searched for original research containing piperacillin or tazobactam clearance (CL) or volume of distribution (V) estimates in patients treated with CKRT. The search yielded 77 articles, of which 26 reported suitable estimates of CL or V. Of the 26 articles, 10 for piperacillin and 8 for tazobactam had complete information suitable for population pharmacokinetic modelling. Also included in the analysis was piperacillin and tazobactam PK data from 4 critically ill patients treated with CKRT in the Military Health System, 2 with burn and 2 without burn.
CONCLUSIONS: Median and range of literature reported PK parameters for piperacillin (CL 2.76 L/hr, 1.4-7.92 L/hr, V 31.2 L, 16.77-42.27 L) and tazobactam (CL 2.34 L/hr, 0.72-5.2 L/hr, V 36.6 L, 26.2-58.87 L) were highly consistent with population estimates (piperacillin CL 2.7 L/hr, 95%CI 1.99-3.41 L/hr, V 25.83 22.07-29.59 L, tazobactam CL 2.49 L/hr, 95%CI 1.55-3.44, V 30.62 95%CI 23.7-37.54). The proportion of patients meeting pre-defined pharmacodynamic (PD) targets (median 88.7, range 71%-100%) was high despite significant mortality (median 44%, range 35%-60%). High mortality was predicted by baseline severity of illness (median APACHE II score 23, range 21-33.25). Choice of lenient or strict PD targets (ie 100%fT >MIC or 100%fT >4XMIC) had the largest impact on probability of target attainment (PTA), whereas presence or intensity of CKRT had minimal impact on PTA.
CONCLUSIONS: Pip-tazo overexposure may be associated with increased mortality, although this is confounded by baseline severity of illness. Achieving adequate pip-tazo exposure is essential; however, risk of harm from overexposure should be considered when choosing a PD target and dose. If lenient PD targets are desired, doses of 2250-3375 mg every 6 h are reasonable for most patients receiving CKRT. However, if a strict PD target is desired, continuous infusion (at least 9000-13500 mg per day) may be required. However, some critically ill CKRT populations may need higher or lower doses and dosing strategies should be tailored to individuals based on all available clinical data including the specific critical care setting.

Therapeutic drug monitoring is increasingly being used to optimize beta-lactam antibiotic dosing. Because beta-lactams are inherently unstable, confirming preanalytical sample stability is critical for reporting reliable results. This review aimed to summarize the published literature on the preanalytical stability of selected widely prescribed beta-lactams used in therapeutic drug monitoring.
The published literature (2010-2020) on the preanalytical stability of flucloxacillin, piperacillin, tazobactam, meropenem, cefalexin, cefazolin, and ceftazidime in human plasma, serum, and whole blood was reviewed. Articles examining preanalytical stability at room temperature, refrigerated, or frozen (-20°C) using liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry or ultraviolet detection were included.
Summarizing the available data allowed for general observations to be made, although data were conflicting in some cases (piperacillin, tazobactam, ceftazidime, and meropenem at room temperature, refrigerated, or -20°C) or limited (cefalexin, cefazolin, and flucloxacillin at -20°C). Overall, with the exception of the more stable cefazolin, preanalytical instability was observed after 6-12 hours at room temperature, 2-3 days when refrigerated, and 1-3 weeks when frozen at -20°C. In all cases, excellent stability was detected at -70°C. Studies focusing on preanalytical stability reported poorer stability than studies investigating stability as part of method validation.
Based on this review, as general guidance, clinical samples for beta-lactam analysis should be refrigerated and analyzed within 2 days or frozen at -20°C and analyzed within 1 week. For longer storage times, freezing at -70°C was required to ensure sample stability. This review highlights the importance of conducting well-designed preanalytical stability studies on beta-lactams and other potentially unstable drugs under clinically relevant conditions.

BACKGROUND: Gram-negative nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP), ventilated HABP (vHABP), and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Common pathogens, including Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, are prevalent in healthcare settings and have few effective treatment options due to high rates of antibacterial resistance. Resistant pathogens are associated with significantly worse outcomes, relative to patients with susceptible infections. Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) has established efficacy in clinical trials of patients with NP. This review aims to collate data on C/T use for HABP/vHABP/VABP infections in real-world clinical practice.
METHODS: This systematic literature review searched online biomedical databases for real-world studies of C/T used to treat Gram-negative respiratory tract infections (RTIs) between January 2009 and June 2020.
RESULTS: Thirty-three studies comprising 658 patients were identified. Pneumonia was the most common infection treated with C/T (85%), with a smaller number of unspecified RTIs (9%) and tracheobronchitis (5%) reported. The majority of patients had respiratory infections caused by P. aeruginosa (92.8%), of which 88.1% were multidrug-resistant. Examination of these studies demonstrated an increase in the percentage of patients receiving the recommended dose of C/T for respiratory infections (3 g q8h or renal impairment-adjusted) over time (36.8% of patients in 2017 to 71.5% in 2020). Clinical success rates ranged from 51.4 to 100%, with 10 studies (55.6% of studies reporting clinical success) reporting clinical success rates of > 70%; microbiological success rates ranged from 57.0 to 100.0%, with three studies (60.0% of studies reporting microbiological success) reporting microbiological success rates of > 70%. Thirty-day mortality ranged from 0.0 to 33.0%, with nine studies (90% of studies reporting mortality) reporting 30-day mortality of < 30%.
CONCLUSIONS: The studies identified in this review demonstrate that C/T shows similar outcomes as those seen in clinical trials, despite the higher frequency of multidrug-resistant pathogens, and comorbidities that may have been excluded from the trials.

In order to use aseptically prepared elastomeric infusers, outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) services require extended stability data for antimicrobial agents to assign a product shelf-life. In the UK, the relevant standards for stability testing and shelf-life assignment are published in \'A Standard Protocol for Deriving and Assessment of Stability-Part 1 (Aseptic Preparations-Small Molecules), commonly called the Yellow Covered Document (YCD). A previous systematic review published in 2017 failed to identify data on the stability of antimicrobials in elastomeric devices for OPAT services that met YCD requirements in force at the time. The aim of this review was to update that search, following a subsequent change to YCD requirements in 2017 and 2019 and expand that dataset to identify progress made in providing assurance about the stability of antimicrobial agents for OPAT services.
Searches were undertaken for papers relating to extended stability of antimicrobials. Citations were included when antimicrobial shelf-life was assessed using a stability-indicating method and considered a period of storage, either refrigerated or at room temperature, followed by in-use testing at a temperature at or above 32°C.
Of 267 initial citations, six met the inclusion criteria and underwent full text review for data extraction. Included antimicrobials were cefazolin, ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam, flucloxacillin and ceftolozane/tazobactam. Of these, only flucloxacillin and piperacillin demonstrated YCD compliant stability over the 24-hour infusion period while cefazolin, ceftazidime and ceftolozane/tazobactam could be infused over 12-hour period.
Contrary to the position found in 2017 review, high-quality data are now available to support the use of a number of antimicrobial agents in extended infusion in elastomeric devices for OPAT services. There is a need to expand the dataset, as well as developing international consensus on the ideal parameters for stability assessment of such infusions in elastomeric devices.