Surgical Technique

外科技术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为了评估可行性,机器人手术入路治疗重度膈型子宫内膜异位症的有效性和安全性。
    方法:回顾性单中心研究,使用法国-欧洲多学科子宫内膜异位症研究所(IFEMendo)数据库和国家子宫内膜异位症观察站(NoEndo)数据库中前瞻性记录的数据。
    方法:三级转诊中心。子宫内膜异位症护理中心。
    方法:从2020年1月至2023年7月,连续60例接受机器人切除重度DE的患者。
    方法:严重DE的机器人切除。
    方法:使用描述性统计对分类变量和连续变量进行评估和比较。P值<0.05被认为是统计学上显著的。
    结果:在76.7%的患者(46/60)中进行了全厚度膈肌切除术,部分膈肌切除10%(6/60)例。60%(36/60)的患者进行了腹膜剥离技术,分为如下:在13.3%的病例(8/60)中,作为广泛的浅表diaphragm肌受累的情况下的唯一技术;除了在46.7%的患者(28/60)的合并多个病灶的情况下进行全厚度或部分膈肌切除。手术时间中位数为79.6分钟,与手术相关的差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。术中及术后并发症发生率分别为1.7%(1/60)和6.6%(4/60),分别。膈疝(Clavien-Dindo3b)是最常见的术后并发症,在所有情况下都需要手术修复。平均住院时间为24小时。随访期间DE症状完全恢复的患者比例逐渐增加,手术后12个月达到89%。
    结论:在本案例系列中,机器人治疗严重的膈型子宫内膜异位症在专家手中是可行的,有效和安全。
    机器人逐步方法可以安全和彻底地切除严重的膈子宫内膜异位症。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of the robotic surgical approach in the treatment of severe diaphragmatic endometriosis (DE).
    METHODS: Retrospective single-center study using data prospectively recorded in the Franco-European Multidisciplinary Institute of Endometriosis database and the National Observatory for Endometriosis database.
    METHODS: Tertiary referral center. Endometriosis care center.
    METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients undergoing robotic excision of severe DE from January 2020 to July 2023.
    METHODS: Robotic excision of severe DE.
    RESULTS: Categorical and continuous variables were evaluated and compared using descriptive statistics. A p value of <.05 was considered statistically significant. Full-thickness diaphragmatic resection was performed in 76.7% of patients (46 of 60) and partial diaphragmatic muscle resection in 10% of cases (6 of 60). Peritoneal stripping technique was performed in 60% of patients (36 of 60), divided as follows: as the only technique in the case of extensive superficial diaphragmatic involvement in 13.3% of cases (8 of 60), in addition to full-thickness or partial diaphragmatic resection in the case of concomitant multiple foci in 46.7% of patients (28 of 60). Median operative time was 79.6 minutes with no statistically significative difference related to the surgeon performing surgery (p >.05). Intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 1.7% (1 of 60) and 6.6% of cases (4 of 60), respectively. Diaphragmatic hernia (Clavien-Dindo 3b) was the most common postoperative complication and required surgical repair in all cases. Median hospital stay was 24 hours. The rate of patients with complete recovery from DE symptoms has gradually increased during follow-up, reaching 89% after 12 months from surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this case series, robotic treatment of severe DE in expert hands was feasible, effective, and safe.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Clavicle fractures represent 2.5-4% of all fractures observed in emergency services. 80% occurs in the middle third. Treatment by plating requires a higher level of evidence.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the functional outcomes of mid-shaft clavicle fractures managed with superior plating compared to anteroinferior plating.
    METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, parallel, superiority clinical trial.
    METHODS: Patients with fractures of the clavicles AO15B1 and AO15B2 were studied. Patients were randomized to be treated with either 3.5 mm superior or anteroinferior plating. A rehabilitation program was designed for both groups. The primary outcome measure was the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score; secondary outcomes included pain, union rate, and complication rates.
    RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were studied and were eligible for analysis. Significant differences were found in the function assessed with the DASH score at 30 days for the superior plating compared with anteroinferior (43.74 vs. 29.26, respectively, p = 0.027), 60 days (23.97 vs. 11.18, p = 0.021), and 90 days (9.52 vs. 3.5, p = 0.016). One loosening with superficial infection was found with superior plating.
    CONCLUSIONS: Using an anteroinferior reconstruction plate in diaphyseal fractures offers better functional results than the upper plate in patients with fractures of the middle third of the clavicle.
    BACKGROUND: Las fracturas de clavícula comprenden el 2.5-4% de todas las fracturas observadas en los servicios de emergencia. El 80% se presentan en el tercio medio. La posición de la placa como tratamiento requiere mayor nivel de evidencia.
    OBJECTIVE: Comparar los resultados funcionales de las fracturas diafisarias de clavícula manejadas con placa superior versus placa anteroinferior.
    UNASSIGNED: Ensayo clínico aleatorizado, doble ciego, paralelo, de superioridad. Se estudiaron pacientes con fractura diafisaria de clavícula AO15B1 y AO15B2. Se manejaron con placa de reconstrucción de 3.5 mm colocada en forma superior o anteroinferior. Se diseñó un programa de rehabilitación para ambos grupos. El resultado primario fue medido con el cuestionario DASH y los resultados secundarios incluyeron dolor, presencia de consolidación y complicaciones.
    RESULTS: Fueron elegibles para análisis 28 pacientes. Se encontraron diferencias significativas de la escala DASH a los 30 días para la maniobra superior comparada con la inferior (43.74 vs. 29.26, respectivamente; p = 0.027), a los 60 días (23.97 vs. 11.18; p = 0.021) y a los 90 días (9.52 vs. 3.5; p = 0.016).
    CONCLUSIONS: El uso de placa de reconstrucción anteroinferior en las fracturas diafisarias ofrece mejores resultados funcionales en comparación con la placa superior en pacientes con fracturas de tercio medio de clavícula.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:涉及后内侧(PM)和后外侧(PL)柱的胫骨平台骨折是复杂的损伤,需要适当的方法。在这些情况下,PL专栏的管理可能会引起争议,并引用了使用深后中间隔方法的局限性。在本文中,对Lobenhoffer方法的修改,旨在优化对PL列的访问,详细描述了。这项研究的目的是评估这种方法在尸体解剖学研究中的可行性。
    方法:总共,五个新鲜冷冻的尸体标本被用于围绕该方法的详细解剖学研究。评估了与皮肤和深层神经血管结构的关系。评估了使用该方法的PL和PM柱的暴露面积。
    结果:尸体研究显示了安全和充分的暴露。位于后中线内侧的斜皮肤和筋膜切口对保护腓肠内侧皮神经和小隐静脉是安全的。在牵开器放置期间,the肌和胫骨后肌的抬高可安全保护胫骨前动脉和the神经血管束。PM和PL柱的充分近端曝光,包括后外侧外侧(PLL)和后外侧中央(PLC)段,在所有标本中获得。
    结论:改良的斜向Lobenhoffer(MOL)方法可能是胫骨平台骨折中获得PL和PM柱的可行选择。
    方法:IV.
    BACKGROUND: Tibial plateau fractures involving posteromedial (PM) and posterolateral (PL) columns are complex injuries that require an appropriate approach. The management of the PL column in these cases can be controversial, and limitations using deep posteromedial interval approaches have been referenced. In this paper, a modification of the Lobenhoffer approach, designed to optimize the access to the PL column, is described in detail. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of this approach in a cadaveric anatomical study.
    METHODS: In total, five fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were used for detailed anatomical study surrounding the approach. Relationships with cutaneous and deep neurovascular structures were evaluated. The exposure area of the PL and PM columns using this approach was assessed.
    RESULTS: The cadaveric study showed safe and adequate exposure. Oblique skin and fascia incision just medial to the posterior midline was safe to protect the medial sural cutaneous nerve and the small saphenous vein. Elevation of the popliteus and tibialis posterior muscles offered safe protection of the anterior tibial artery and popliteal neurovascular bundle during retractor placement. Adequate full proximal exposure of the PM and PL columns, including the posterolateral lateral (PLL) and posterolateral central (PLC) segments, was obtained in all specimens.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Modified Oblique Lobenhoffer (MOL) approach can be a feasible option to access PL and PM columns in tibial plateau fractures.
    METHODS: IV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于口腔粘膜下纤维化(OSMF)是一种慢性进行性疾病,治疗是基于疾病的严重程度。手术治疗是III级和IV级OSMF病例的唯一选择,因为患者既不能清洁口腔也不能正确咀嚼。由此产生的软组织缺损需要用各种血管化良好的组织如口外皮瓣进行表面修复,口内皮瓣,微血管皮瓣,和已经使用过的同种异体移植物。重建由此产生的缺陷被证明是具有挑战性的。直到日期,由于现有技术的各种缺点,没有一种皮瓣被证明是有效的,并且被普遍接受用于OSMF的治疗。进行这项研究是为了了解内窥镜辅助颈阔肌皮瓣在操作简便和术后功能方面是否比常规方法具有更好的结果。
    该研究包括40名III级和IV级OSMF患者,他们在北印度三级中心的口腔颌面外科门诊报告。将这些患者随机分为两组。第一组和第二组各有20名患者,接受内镜辅助颈阔肌皮瓣和非内镜辅助颈阔肌皮瓣进行OSMF带切除后重建,分别。分析了开口的数据,操作时间,皮瓣生存力,颈部和口腔充血,炎症的迹象,神经评估,和测量排水。
    结果显示,张口从术前值到术后即刻和24h的值显著增加,1周,15天,1个月,3个月,两组均在手术后6个月进行。与II组相比,I组出血发生率降低,随访期间注意到更好的术后结局。但I组受试者的平均术中时间为130.80±5.5.908分钟,II组为105.74±2。491分钟。第一组时间增加可能是由于学习曲线长。
    本研究得出的结论是,内窥镜辅助技术在上和颈下夹层中具有关键作用,以实现更好的可及性,处理,皮瓣的可见性及其相对于下层结构的方向,以避免术后并发症,并克服颈阔肌肌皮瓣在OSMF缺损重建中的缺点。
    UNASSIGNED: As oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) is a chronic progressive disorder, the treatment is based on the severity of the disease. Surgical treatment is the only choice for grade III and grade IV OSMF cases because the patient can neither clean his/her mouth nor properly chew. The resulting soft tissue defect requires resurfacing with various well-vascularized tissues such as extraoral flaps, intraoral flaps, microvascular flaps, and allografts that have been used. Reconstruction of the resultant defects proved to be challenging. Till date, none of the flaps has been proven to be effective and is universally accepted for the treatment of OSMF because of various drawbacks of the available techniques. This study was conducted to know whether an endoscopic-assisted platysma flap is associated with better outcomes in terms of ease of operation and postoperative function than the conventional approach.
    UNASSIGNED: This study included 40 patients of grade III and grade IV OSMF reporting to the outpatient department of oral and maxillofacial surgery in a tertiary center of North India. These patients were divided randomly into two groups. Group I and Group II had 20 patients each, undergoing endoscopic-assisted platysma flap and non-endoscopic-assisted platysma flap for reconstruction after resection of OSMF bands, respectively. Data were analyzed for the mouth opening, operating time, flap viability, congestion of neck and oral cavity, signs of inflammation, neurologic assessment, and measurement of the drain.
    UNASSIGNED: The results showed significant increase in mouth opening from the preoperative value to the values immediately after surgery and at 24 h, 1 week, 15 days, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery in both the study groups. Reduced bleeding incidence was found in group I compared to group II, with better postoperative outcomes noted during follow-up. But the mean intraoperative time of the subjects in group I was 130.80 ± 5.5.908 min and in group II was 105.74 ± 2. 491 min. Increased time taken in group I may be due to the long learning curve.
    UNASSIGNED: The present study concluded that the Endoscope-assisted technique has a key role during supra and subplatysmal dissection to allow for better accessibility, handling, and visibility of the flap and its orientation in relation to the underlying structures to avoid postoperative complications and to overcome the drawback of platysma myocutaneous flap in reconstruction of OSMF defects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景第三磨牙拔除是一种常规的口腔外科手术,通常由于干槽症(牙槽骨炎)的发展而变得复杂。这项前瞻性观察性研究旨在调查干窝的患病率,并确定相关的风险因素和原因。有助于全面了解口腔外科手术的术后结果。方法本研究采用前瞻性观察性设计,随访12个月。计划进行第三磨牙拔除的18-40岁参与者包括在内,而那些有凝血功能障碍的人,孕妇或哺乳期妇女,维生素缺乏的患者,并排除使用影响愈合的药物的个体.数据收集涉及基线的全面评估,术中细节,以及术后48小时的评估,一个星期,还有两个星期.统计分析包括描述性统计,卡方检验,t检验,或者Mann-WhitneyU测试,和Logistic回归进行危险因素分析。结果共有238名具有不同人口统计学特征的参与者参加了这项研究。干窝的患病率从48小时的20.6%逐渐增加到拔除后两周的41.2%。吸烟,口腔卫生差,手术技术成为重要的危险因素,相应的比值比为6.41(95%CI:2.86-14.36,p<0.001),9.53(95%CI:2.12-42.84,p=0.003),和3.27(95%CI:2.08-5.15,p<0.001),分别。疼痛强度,使用视觉模拟刻度测量,从提取后48小时到两周逐渐降低。结论这项研究为第三磨牙拔除后与干牙相关的患病率和危险因素提供了有价值的见解。吸烟,口腔卫生差,不良的手术技术被确定为重要的贡献者,强调术前咨询和有针对性干预的重要性。
    Background Third molar extraction is a routine oral surgical procedure that is often complicated by the development of a dry socket (alveolar osteitis). This prospective observational study aimed to investigate the prevalence of dry sockets and identify associated risk factors and causes, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of the postoperative outcomes of oral surgery. Methods This study employed a prospective observational design with a 12-month follow-up period. Participants aged 18-40 years scheduled for third molar extraction were included, whereas those with coagulopathies, pregnant or lactating women, patients with vitamin deficiencies, and individuals on medications affecting healing were excluded. Data collection involved comprehensive assessments at baseline, intraoperative details, and postoperative evaluations at 48 hours, one week, and two weeks. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, t-tests, or Mann-Whitney U tests, and logistic regression for the risk factor analysis. Results A total of 238 participants with diverse demographic characteristics were enrolled in this study. The prevalence of dry sockets increased progressively from 20.6% at 48 hours to 41.2% at two weeks post-extraction. Smoking, poor oral hygiene, and surgical technique emerged as significant risk factors, with corresponding odds ratios of 6.41 (95% CI: 2.86-14.36, p < 0.001), 9.53 (95% CI: 2.12-42.84, p = 0.003), and 3.27 (95% CI: 2.08-5.15, p < 0.001), respectively. Pain intensity, measured using a Visual Analog Scale, gradually decreased from 48 hours to two weeks post-extraction. Conclusion This study provides valuable insights into the prevalence and risk factors associated with dry sockets following third molar extractions. Smoking, poor oral hygiene, and poor surgical techniques were identified as significant contributors, emphasizing the importance of preoperative counseling and targeted interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:精索微神经支配(MSCD)是治疗男性难治性阴囊内容疼痛的有效方法。对于对保持生育能力不感兴趣的患者,一些中心主张在去神经支配期间结扎血管,而其他人更喜欢剥离输精管以保护血管动脉,因此保留了睾丸的脉管系统,并可能减少术后充血疼痛。
    目的:比较慢性睾丸痛患者的预后,通过剥离或结扎输精管进行MSCD。
    方法:对2017-2023年接受MSCD的85例患者进行回顾性分析。记录患者的人口统计学特征,包括先前的外科手术史。对手术的反应被评估为疼痛的完全缓解,部分缓解疼痛,或者疼痛没有改善。
    结果:85例患者接受了MSCD,中位数(四分位距,IQR)年龄为36(25.5-46.5)岁,疼痛持续时间中位数为16(6-31)个月。37名患者接受了血管剥离,而在MSCD期间有48例接受了血管结扎术。中位随访时间为12个月。结扎组有21例(43.5%)患者曾进行过腹股沟阴囊手术,而剥离组有5例(13.5%),p=0.003。两组之间疼痛的病因相似。两组对MSCD的反应相似,67.6%的患者接受了剥离的疼痛完全缓解,而接受结扎的患者为66.7%(p=0.968)。术后并发症发生率相似(p值=0.132)。
    结论:在患有顽固性慢性阴囊内容疼痛且对保留生育能力不感兴趣的男性中,结扎,或剥离输精管在疼痛缓解方面产生类似的结果。两种技术都是安全的,没有任何睾丸萎缩的报道。
    BACKGROUND: Microdenervation of the spermatic cord (MSCD) is an effective treatment modality for men with intractable scrotal content pain. For patients not interested in preserving fertility, some centers advocate ligation of the vas during denervation, while others prefer stripping of the vas deferens to preserve the vasal artery, hence preserving vasculature to the testis and possibly decreasing post-operative congestion pain.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of patients with chronic orchialgia, who underwent MSCD by either stripping or ligating the vas deferens.
    METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 85 patients who underwent MSCD from 2017-2023 was performed. Patients\' demographics including history of prior surgical procedures were recorded. Response to surgery was evaluated as either complete resolution of pain, partial resolution of pain, or no improvement in pain.
    RESULTS: Eighty-five patients underwent MSCD with a median (interquartile range, IQR) age of 36 (25.5-46.5) years and median duration of pain of 16 (6-31) months. Thirty-seven patients underwent stripping of vas, while 48 underwent ligation of vas during MSCD. Median follow up was 12 months. Twenty-one (43.5%) patients had prior inguinal scrotal surgery in the ligation group compared to 5 (13.5%) in the stripping group, p = 0.003. The etiology of pain was similar between the groups. The response to MSCD between the two groups was similar, 67.6% of patients who underwent stripping had complete resolution of pain versus 66.7% of those who had ligation (p = 0.968), with similar rates of post-operative complications (p-value = 0.132).
    CONCLUSIONS: In men with intractable chronic scrotal content pain with no interest in preserving fertility, ligation, or stripping of the vas deferens yields similar outcomes with regard to pain resolution. Both techniques are safe with no reports of any testicular atrophy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:小脑内裂的外侧经常有血管病变,是用于进入脑桥被膜的常见手术通道,以及小脑和它的上肢和中肢。小脑的四边形小叶(QLC)代表了到达这些结构的障碍。作者试图分析和比较QLC切除术前后小脑间区(CIPR)的暴露情况,并提供一系列病例来评估其临床适用性。
    方法:用Klingler法制备人脑干42侧并解剖。测量并统计研究QLC切除前后的暴露面积。介绍了59例接受QLC切除术治疗CIPR病变的患者,并在1年的随访中评估了临床结果。
    结果:QLC切除后,CIPR的前后手术通道增加了10.3mm。QLC切除前的平均暴露面积为42mm2,切除后为159.6mm2。在这个系列中,共济失调,锥体外系综合征,手术后发现了运动异常的默症。然而,所有这些病例在随访1年内得到解决。改良Rankin量表评分提高1级,平均而言。
    结论:QLC切除显著增加了暴露面积,主要在前后轴。这种手术策略似乎是安全的,可以帮助神经外科医生在小脑中脑裂的外侧进行手术。
    OBJECTIVE: The lateral aspect of the cerebellomesencephalic fissure frequently harbors vascular pathology and is a common surgical corridor used to access the pons tegmentum, as well as the cerebellum and its superior and middle peduncles. The quadrangular lobule of the cerebellum (QLC) represents an obstacle to reach these structures. The authors sought to analyze and compare exposure of the cerebellar interpeduncular region (CIPR) before and after QLC resection and provide a case series to evaluate its clinical applicability.
    METHODS: Forty-two sides of human brainstems were prepared with Klingler\'s method and dissected. The exposure area before and after resection of the QLC was measured and statistically studied. A case series of 59 patients who underwent QLC resection for the treatment of CIPR lesions was presented and clinical outcomes were evaluated at 1-year follow-up.
    RESULTS: The anteroposterior surgical corridor of the CIPR increased by 10.3 mm after resection of the QLC. The mean exposure areas were 42 mm2 before resection of the QLC and 159.6 mm2 after resection. In this series, ataxia, extrapyramidal syndrome, and akinetic mutism were found after surgery. However, all these cases resolved within 1 year of follow-up. Modified Rankin Scale score improved by 1 grade, on average.
    CONCLUSIONS: QLC resection significantly increased the exposure area, mainly in the anteroposterior axis. This surgical strategy appears to be safe and may help the neurosurgeon when operating on the lateral aspect of the cerebellomesencephalic fissure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:原发性自发性气胸的最佳手术策略仍存在争议,预计手术实践会有所不同。这种变化可能会影响临床结果,如术后并发症和住院时间。这项以人口为基础的国家注册研究提供了荷兰当前外科手术实践和结果变化的概述和程度。
    方法:为了确定治疗原发性自发性气胸的国家护理模式和医院间差异,在2014-2021年期间接受胸膜固定术和/或大疱切除术的患者,从荷兰肺癌审核-外科数据库中确定.手术干预的类型,术后并发症,记录住院时间和同侧复发。
    结论:在4,338例患者中,1,851例患者被确定为原发性自发性气胸。中位年龄为25岁(四分位距20-31),男性占82%。执行最多的外科手术是胸膜固定术(83%)。总并发症发生率为12%(ClavienDindo分级≥III级6%),持续漏气>5天的发生率最高(5%)。术后中位住院时间为4天(四分位距3-6),并且0.7%的患者因同侧复发而进行了重复胸膜固定术。医院之间的并发症率和住院时间差异很大。外科手术之间没有差异。在荷兰,患有原发性自发性气胸的手术患者最好接受大泡切除术加胸膜固定术治疗。术后并发症和住院时间差异很大,在这个年轻患者组中相当大。这可以通过优化手术护理来减少。
    OBJECTIVE: The optimal surgical strategy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax remains a matter of debate and variation in surgical practice is expected. This variation may influence clinical outcomes, such as postoperative complications and length of stay. This national population-based registry study provides an overview and extent of variability of current surgical practice and outcomes in the Netherlands.
    METHODS: To identify national patterns of care and between-hospital variability in the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax, patients who underwent surgical pleurodesis and/or bullectomy between 2014 and 2021, were identified from the Dutch Lung Cancer Audit-Surgery database. The type of surgical intervention, postoperative complications, length of stay and ipsilateral recurrences were recorded.
    CONCLUSIONS: Out of 4338 patients, 1851 patients were identified to have primary spontaneous pneumothorax. The median age was 25 years (interquartile range 20-31) and 82% was male. The most performed surgical procedure was bullectomy with pleurodesis (83%). The overall complication rate was 12% (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III 6%), with the highest recorded incidence for persistent air leak >5 days (5%). Median postoperative length of stay was 4 days (interquartile range 3-6) and 0.7% underwent a repeat pleurodesis for ipsilateral recurrence. Complication rate and length of stay differed considerably between hospitals. There were no differences between the surgical procedures. In the Netherlands, surgical patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax are preferably treated with bullectomy plus pleurodesis. Postoperative complications and length of stay vary widely and are considerable in this young patient group. This may be reduced by optimization of surgical care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:Bankart病变是肱骨关节最常见的病变之一。据报道,Bankart修复的几种双排缝合方法,可以提供更多的稳定性,还有更多的运动限制和并发症。因此,我们引入了一种新的双行Bankart修复技术,关键点双排缝合线,在中线使用一个锚。本文的目的是研究这种新方法的临床效果,并将其与单排缝线进行比较。
    方法:回顾性收集2010年10月至2014年6月行关键点双排缝合或单排缝合的78例患者。基本信息包括性别、年龄,优势臂,并收集了不稳定的发作次数。手术前,通过CT扫描测量关节盂骨丢失。视觉模拟量表,美国肩肘外科医生,加州大学洛杉矶分校的肩秤,在手术前和最后一次随访时评估主观肩价值。
    结果:44例患者(24例接受单排缝合,20例接受关键点双排缝合)均获成功随访。随访期为9.2±1.1年(范围,7.8-11.4年)。在最后一次随访中,所有临床评分均未检测到显著差异.单行组复发率为12.5%,双行组复发率为10%,分别(p=0.795)对单排组14例(31.8%)和双排组9例(26.5%)的患者进行了活动范围测试.仅在90°外展时的内旋差异有统计学意义(单排为48.9°,双排为76.7°,p=0.033)。
    结论:与单行缝合相比,Bankart病变的关键点双行缝合可获得相似的长期结果,一个内侧锚并没有导致有限的运动范围。低复发率和先前的生物力学结果也表明关键点双排缝合是一种可靠的方法。
    OBJECTIVE: Bankart lesion is one of the most common lesions of the glenohumeral joint. Several double-row suture methods were reported for Bankart repair, which could provide more stability, yet more motion limitation and complications. Therefore, we introduced a new double-row Bankart repair technique, key point double-row suture which used one anchor in the medial line. The purpose of this article is to investigate the clinical outcomes of this new method and to compare it with single-row suture.
    METHODS: Seventy-eight patients receiving key point double-row suture or single-row suture from October 2010 to June 2014 were collected retrospectively. The basic information including gender, age, dominant arm, and number of episodes of instability was collected. Before surgery, the glenoid bone loss was measured from the CT scan. The visual analogue scale, American shoulder and elbow surgeons, the University of California at Los Angeles shoulder scale, and subjective shoulder value were valued before surgery and at the last follow-up.
    RESULTS: Forty-four patients (24 patients receiving single-row suture and 20 patients receiving key point double-row suture) were followed up successfully. The follow-up period was 9.2 ± 1.1 years (range, 7.8-11.4 years). At the last follow-up, no significant differences were detected for any of the clinical scores. The recurrence rate was 12.5% for the single-row group and 10% for the double-row group, respectively (p = 0.795) 14 patients (31.8%) in the single-row group and nine patients (26.5%) in the double-row group were tested for active range of motion. A statistically significant difference was found only for the internal rotation at 90° abduction (48.9° for single-row and 76.7° for key point double-row, p = 0.033).
    CONCLUSIONS: The key point double-row sutures for Bankart lesions could achieve similar long-term outcomes compared with single-row suture, and one medial anchor did not result in a limited range of motion. The low recurrence rate and previous biomechanical results also indicate the key point double-row suture is a reliable method.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胎盘植入谱是一种严重的疾病,与显著的产妇发病率甚至死亡率相关。推荐的治疗方法是子宫切除术。另一种选择是一步保守手术,这包括整块切除受胎盘植入谱影响的子宫肌层,其次是子宫重建。目前,在随机对照试验的背景下,没有比较这两种技术的研究。
    目的:我们进行了一项前瞻性注册的多中心随机对照试验,比较了子宫切除术和一步保守手术。目的是收集两种技术在子宫切除术或一步保守修复的女性中的可行性和临床结果。除了参与者对随机化的可接受性,我们还收集了术中失血量,输血要求,严重不良事件和其他临床结局。
    方法:60名产前强烈怀疑胎盘植入的妇女被随机分配到子宫切除术(n=31)或一步保守手术(n=29)。
    结果:在20个月期间,64名符合条件的患者中有60名(93.7%)接受了随机分组。意向治疗分析显示,一步保守性手术的临床结果与膀胱切除术相当。术中出血中位数(1740mL(IQR1010-2410)与1500mL(IQR1122-2753),OR1(1-1,p=0.942),中位手术时间(IQR135分钟(111-180)vs155分钟(IQR120-185),或0.99(0.98-1,p=0.151)),输血率(58.6%vs61.3%。OR0.96(0.83-1.76,p=0.768)),和不良事件(17.2%对9.7%,OR分别为1.77(0.43-10.19,p=0.398))。对1型女性的亚组进行地形图分类的比较表明,在分配到该组的所有参与者中,一步手术都是成功的,临床结果优于子宫切除术,手术时间较短(中位数125(IQR98-128)vs180(129-226)分钟,p=0.002),输血率较低(46.2%vs82.4%),和较少单位的红细胞输注(中位数1(IQR1-1.8)对3(IQR2-4)单位,p=0.007)。
    结论:一项比较两种手术技术治疗胎盘植入谱的随机对照试验是可行的。在大多数情况下,一步保守修复是子宫切除术的有效替代方法,但这只能在术中手术分期后才能确定。
    背景:NCT05013749。
    Placenta accreta spectrum is a serious condition associated with significant maternal morbidity and even mortality. The recommended treatment is hysterectomy. An alternative is 1-step conservative surgery, which involves the en bloc resection of the myometrium affected by placenta accreta spectrum along with the placenta, followed by uterine reconstruction. Currently, there are no studies comparing the 2 techniques in the setting of a randomized controlled trial.
    We performed a prospectively registered multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing hysterectomy with 1-step conservative surgery. The aim was to collect feasibility and clinical outcomes of the 2 techniques in women assigned to hysterectomy or 1-step conservative surgery. In addition to assessing participants\' willingness to be randomized, we also collected data on intraoperative blood loss, transfusion requirement, serious adverse event, and other clinical outcomes.
    Sixty women with strong antenatal suspicion of placenta accreta spectrum were assigned randomly to either hysterectomy (n=31) or 1-step conservative surgery (n=29).
    During a 20-month period, 60 of the 64 eligible patients (93.7%) underwent randomization. Intention-to-treat analysis showed that the clinical outcomes for 1-step conservative surgery were comparable to those of hysterectomy (median intraoperative blood loss, 1740 mL [interquartile range, 1010-2410] vs 1500 mL [interquartile range, 1122-2753]; odds ratio, 1 [1-1]; P=.942; median duration of surgery, 135 minutes [interquartile range, 111-180] vs 155 minutes [interquartile range, 120-185]; odds ratio, 0.99 [0.98-1]; P=.151; transfusion rate, 58.6% vs 61.3%; odds ratio, 0.96 [0.83-1.76]; P=.768; and adverse event rate, 17.2% vs 9.7%; odds ratio, 1.77 [0.43-10.19]; P=.398; respectively). In the subgroup of women with type 1 class on topographic classification, all participants allocated to 1-step surgery had successful outcomes, which were superior to those of hysterectomy. This was evidenced by the shorter surgery duration (median, 125 [interquartile range, 98-128] vs 180 [129-226] minutes; P=.002), lower transfusion rates (46.2% vs 82.4%), and fewer units of red blood cells transfused (median, 1 [interquartile range, 1-1.8] vs 3 [interquartile range, 2-4] units; P=.007).
    A randomized controlled trial comparing 2 surgical techniques for the treatment of placenta accreta spectrum is feasible. One-step conservative repair is a valid alternative to hysterectomy in the large majority of cases, but this can only be ascertained following intraoperative surgical staging. El resumen está disponible en Español al final del artículo.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号