Successful aging

成功老化
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:成功衰老(SA)描述了在老年时实现最佳身心健康和社会福祉组合的多维方面。近年来,人们对了解SA患病率的兴趣日益浓厚。本研究系统地评估了全球SA的现状,定义为多维结果。
    目的:系统评估老年人SA的全球患病率。
    方法:我们搜索了PubMed,Embase,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,中国生物医学数据库,中国国家知识基础设施,万方数据知识服务平台,和维普数据库从成立到2024年2月14日。两名研究者独立进行文献筛选,数据提取,和质量评估。采用Stata16.0进行Meta分析。
    结果:包括250,460名老年人的30项研究。Meta分析显示,SA的全球总体患病率为24.0%[95%CI(20.7%,27.3%)]。亚洲患病率为25.1%,21.5%在欧洲,美洲为20.6%;发达国家为16.8%,发展中国家为27.1%。亚组分析显示男性老年人的SA发生率较高,已婚/同居,生活在城市地区,拥有更高的教育水平。
    结论:全球老年人SA患病率较低,随着年龄组的变化,regions,和教育水平。由于纳入研究的局限性,需要进一步的高质量研究来验证这些发现.
    BACKGROUND: Successful aging (SA) describes the multidimensional aspects of achieving optimal physical and mental health and social well-being combinations in old age. Recent years have seen increasing interest in understanding SA prevalence. This study systematically evaluates the current state of SA globally, defined as multidimensional outcomes.
    OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the global prevalence of SA in older adults.
    METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China Biomedical Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and Weipu Database from inception to February 14, 2024. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, data extraction, and quality evaluation. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0.
    RESULTS: Thirty studies comprising 250,460 older adults were included. Meta-analysis showed the overall global prevalence of SA was 24.0 % [95 % CI (20.7 %, 27.3 %)]. Prevalence rates were 25.1 % in Asia, 21.5 % in Europe, 20.6 % in the Americas; 16.8 % in developed and 27.1 % in developing countries. Subgroup analyses indicated higher SA rates among male older adults, married/cohabiting, living in urban areas, and having higher education levels.
    CONCLUSIONS: The global prevalence of SA among older adults is low, with variations across age groups, regions, and education levels. Due to the limitations of the included studies, further high-quality research is needed to validate these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:退伍军人的衰老经历为成功的衰老提供了重要的见解,并为受不同健康和社会需求限制的后期生活环境提供了手段。当退伍军人承受如此多的压力并对以后的生活产生严重的健康和社会后果时,他们可以成功地衰老吗?退伍军人可以为开发完善成功衰老的综合方法提供宝贵的经验教训,确保不同老年人群的包容性。基于Rowe和Kahn关于成功衰老的想法,我们利用“主动衰老”的互补概念来探索是否有独特的因素,特点,以及支持退伍军人积极衰老的干预措施,与非退伍军人相比。
    方法:在医学的9个数据库中进行了快速回顾和证据综合,心理学,人类学,社会学,和公共卫生,以搜索同行评审的文章和研究报告。
    结果:研究结果表明,将健康和社会层面联系起来的计划可以支持退伍军人的积极老龄化,即促进积极的身体和认知生活方式以及社会联系和参与的干预措施。此类计划和干预措施有助于预防和打击身心健康下降,并提高生活质量和福祉。
    结论:研究结果对更广泛的退伍军人和非退伍军人人群都有影响,因为即使人们有独特的健康和社会需求,他们也可以积极地衰老。
    OBJECTIVE: The aging experiences of military veterans provide critical insights into what successful aging is and means for later life contexts constrained by distinct health and social needs. Can veterans \'successfully\' age when they are exposed to so many stressors with serious health and social consequences for later life? Veterans can offer valuable lessons for developing comprehensive approaches to refining successful aging, ensuring inclusivity of different older populations. Building on Rowe and Kahn\'s idea of successful aging, we utilize the complementary concept of \'active aging\' to explore if there are unique factors, characteristics, and interventions that support active aging in veterans, compared to non-veteran populations.
    METHODS: A rapid review and evidence synthesis was conducted across 9 databases in medicine, psychology, anthropology, sociology, and public health to search for peer-reviewed articles and research reports.
    RESULTS: Findings suggest that programs linking health and social dimensions can support the active aging of veterans, namely interventions promoting active physical and cognitive lifestyle as well as social connectedness and engagement. Such programs and interventions help prevent and combat mental and physical health decline and increase quality of life and well-being.
    CONCLUSIONS: Findings have implications for veteran and non-veteran populations more broadly, as people can actively age even when they have unique health and social needs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:现有文献强调了终身残疾的老年人的健康和社会不平等,以及需要进行研究以更好地了解我们如何支持这一群体的年龄。这项范围界定综述绘制了与终身残疾人的“老龄化”相关的现有文献。
    方法:搜索了五个科学数据库和灰色文献来源,以寻找与“老龄化”和“终身残疾”(定义为一个人从出生或幼儿期就患有的残疾)相关的研究。
    结果:我们确定了81项研究,这些研究很好地讨论了终身残疾的衰老,大多数(70%)专注于智力障碍。两个主题捕获了关于终身残疾的老龄化的现有研究:1。)很好地构建了终身残疾的老龄化,其中包括终身残疾的人,他们的支持者和现有的研究框架老化良好,这一组和2。)支持人们终身残疾的年龄,这涉及到微观,研究表明可以采取干预措施来促进老龄化的中观和宏观因素。
    结论:本综述强调了目前文献中如何很好地描述衰老,以及在该群体中可以采取哪些干预措施来改善衰老。文献强调了考虑多层次干预措施以改善老龄化的重要性。证据差距包括缺乏与智障人士以外的群体进行的研究,以及需要更多的研究来检查老龄化干预措施。
    OBJECTIVE: Existing literature highlights notable health and social inequalities for people aging with a lifelong disability and the need for research to better understand how we can support this group to age well. This scoping review mapped existing literature related to \"aging well\" in people with lifelong disabilities.
    METHODS: Five scientific databases and gray literature sources were searched for studies related to \"aging well\" and \"lifelong disability\" (defined as a disability that a person had lived with since birth or early childhood).
    RESULTS: We identified 81 studies that discussed aging well with a lifelong disability, with most (70%) focusing on intellectual disabilities. Two themes captured existing research on aging well with a lifelong disability: (1) framing aging well with a lifelong disability, which included the ways that people with lifelong disability, their supporters, and existing research frame aging well for this group and (2) supporting people to age well with a lifelong disability, which involves the micro-, meso-, and macro-level factors where research suggests interventions to facilitate aging well could be situated.
    CONCLUSIONS: This synthesis highlights how aging well is currently framed in the literature and where interventions to improve aging well in this group could be situated. Literature highlights the importance of considering multilevel interventions to improve aging well. Evidence gaps include the lack of research conducted with groups other than those with intellectual disabilities and the need for more research examining aging well interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项系统评价和荟萃分析调查了老年人的成功衰老(SA)与弹性之间的关系,专注于60岁及以上的个人,解决在理解弹性如何对SA做出贡献方面存在的重大差距。
    方法:遵循Cochrane审查指南,我们在WebofScience等数据库中进行了搜索,PsycNet,和PubMed直到2021年12月,并使用PRISMA作为报告结果的工具。我们的纳入标准是对60岁及以上老年人的心理弹性和SA的研究。排除标准包括身体弹性研究,SA的医疗结果,筛选研究中未使用的其他指标(例如,患病率,means),有自杀意念或慢性/姑息性疾病的人群,将弹性作为SA指标的研究,以及韧性与SA关系的定性研究。
    结果:共纳入21项研究,并使用漏斗图和修剪填充方法评估偏倚风险。荟萃分析显示,中等效应大小表明韧性与SA之间存在正相关关系。然而,高度异质性需要对这些结果进行谨慎的解释。普通人群中的老年人与退休社区中的老年人之间没有发现显着差异,地理差异也不是(亚洲,欧洲,美国)发现缓和了这种关系。
    结论:研究结果强调了老年人对衰老的态度之间的内在联系,他们的主观评价,以及他们的心理弹性。复原力作为对抗心理和身体逆境的保护因素,强调在旨在促进SA的干预措施中增强韧性策略的重要性。由于纳入研究的异质性,本分析得出的结论应谨慎对待。
    BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the relationship between successful aging (SA) and resilience in older adults, focusing on individuals aged 60 and above, to address a significant gap in understanding how resilience contributes to SA.
    METHODS: Following the Cochrane review guidelines, we conducted searches in databases such as Web of Science, PsycNet, and PubMed up to December 2021 and used PRISMA as a tool for reporting the results. Our inclusion criteria were studies on psychological resilience and SA in older adults aged 60 and above. Exclusion criteria included studies on physical resilience, medical outcomes of SA, other indicators not used in screened studies (e.g., prevalence, means), populations with suicidal ideation or chronic/palliative illnesses, studies considering resilience as an indicator of SA, and qualitative studies on the association between resilience and SA.
    RESULTS: A total of 21 studies were included and assessed for risk of bias using funnel plot and trim-and-fill methods. The meta-analysis revealed a medium effect size indicating a positive relationship between resilience and SA. However, high heterogeneity warrants a cautious interpretation of these results. No significant differences were found between older adults in the general population and those in retirement communities, nor were geographical variations (Asia, Europe, America) found to moderate this relationship.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the intrinsic link between older adults\' attitudes towards aging, their subjective evaluations, and their level of psychological resilience. Resilience acts as a protective factor against psychological and physical adversities, underscoring the importance of resilience-enhancing strategies in interventions aimed at promoting SA. The conclusions drawn from this analysis should be approached with caution due to the heterogeneity of the included studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    成功衰老(SA)被创造为一个术语,用于描述与实现身心健康以及社会福祉健康的最佳组合相关的多维方面。老年时的心理和社会福祉。近年来,人们对了解SA的决定因素的作用越来越感兴趣,比如人口统计,生物,行为,心理和社会因素。综合最近的证据,我们对定义为多维结局的SA的一系列决定因素和指标进行了系统综述.
    对PubMed的系统搜索,MEDLINE和WebofScience在2016年8月至2023年6月期间发表的合格论文是根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目进行的。审查方案已在PROSPERO国际前瞻性系统审查登记册(注册号:CRD42021250200)中注册。基于网络的自动筛选工具Rayyan用于标题和摘要筛选。使用预后研究质量(QUIPS)工具评估研究质量。
    最初使用预定义的搜索策略识别了总共3,191条记录。在全文筛选的289篇文章中,22人被发现符合条件,并包括在审查中。已经探索了与SA有关的各种因素,从社会人口因素来看,营养,生活方式,生物途径,心理健康,和幸福。总的来说,最近的研究结果证实了代谢健康的作用,坚持健康的饮食习惯,比如地中海饮食,身体活动,禁止吸烟,和较高的社会经济地位是与SA较高几率相关的主要因素。新兴研究强调了心理社会因素和早期生活健康作为SA决定因素的作用。
    总之,这篇综述强调了健康生活和监测代谢风险以及维持成年生活中的心理健康作为SA主要决定因素的重要性.关于SA的进一步方法和研究工作将为在老龄化社会中制定适当的健康促进政策铺平道路。
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021250200,CRD42021250200。
    Successful aging (SA) has been coined as a term to describe the multidimensional aspects associated with achieving optimal combination of physical and mental health along with social well-being health, mental and social well-being at older age. In recent years there has been an increased interest in understanding the role of determinants of SA, such as demographic, biological, behavioral, psychological and social factors. To synthesize the recent evidence, we conducted a systematic review of longitudinal studies on a range of determinants and indicators of SA defined as a multidimensional outcome.
    A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE and Web of Science for finding eligible papers published between August 2016 and June 2023 was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (Registration number: CRD42021250200). The web-based automated screening tool-Rayyan-was used for title and abstract screening. The study quality was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool.
    A total of 3,191 records were initially identified using the predefined search strategy. Out of 289 articles selected for full text screening, 22 were found eligible and included in the review. A variety of factors have been explored in relation to SA, ranging from socio-demographic factors, nutrition, lifestyle, biological pathways, psychological health, and well-being. Overall, the results of recent studies have confirmed the role of metabolic health, adherence to healthy dietary patterns, such as the Mediterranean diet, physical activity, non-smoking, and higher socio-economic status as main factors associated with higher odds for SA. Emerging research highlights the role of psycho-social factors and early life health as determinants of SA.
    In summary, this review highlights the importance of healthy living and monitoring metabolic risk along with sustaining psychological well-being in adult life as major determinants of SA. Further methodological and research work on SA would pave the way toward development of adequate health promotion policies in aging societies.
    https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021250200, CRD42021250200.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患有痴呆症的老年人会逐渐下降,促使人们依赖他人获得精神上的关怀和支持。尽管人们对研究痴呆症患者(PLwD)的兴趣与日俱增,关于PLwD精神需求的经验证据尚未得到综合。使用Whittemore和Knafl方法,这篇综合综述研究了2000年至2022年关于PLwD精神护理需求的文献。我们试图确定PLwD的精神需求的特征以及解决这些需求的方法。ATLA宗教,CINAHL,PsycINFO,PubMed,和Socindex数据库用于检索文献,12篇同行评审文章符合纳入标准.精神护理需求因研究而异。总的来说,研究结果支持识别PLwDs的宗教和精神背景以告知以人为本的护理的重要性。精神需求被确定为与过去的含义以及宗教和精神背景有关的口头和非口头表达,并且在护理中并未得到一致解决。提供者报告说,在轻度阶段观察到精神上的困扰,这促使需要精神上的照顾。非常需要针对痴呆症的精神评估工具和精神护理干预措施,以支持痴呆症护理中的精神福祉。精神护理涉及促进宗教仪式和提供精神团体治疗以及宗教和精神活动。
    Older adults living with dementia experience progressive decline, prompting reliance on others for spiritual care and support. Despite a growing interest in studying persons living with dementia (PLwDs), empirical evidence on the spiritual needs of PLwDs has not been synthesized. Using the Whittemore and Knafl method, this integrative review examined the literature from 2000 to 2022 on the spiritual care needs of PLwDs. We sought to identify characteristics of the spiritual needs of PLwDs and ways to address them. The ATLA Religion, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Socindex databases were used to search the literature, and 12 peer-reviewed articles met the inclusion criteria. Spiritual care needs varied across studies. Overall, findings support the importance of identifying PLwDs\' religious and spiritual backgrounds to inform person-centered care. Spiritual needs were identified as verbal and non-verbal expressions related to past meaning and religious and spiritual background and were not consistently addressed in care. Providers reported observing spiritual distress in the mild stage prompting the need for spiritual care. There is a great need for dementia-specific spiritual assessment tools and spiritual care interventions to support spiritual well-being in dementia care. Spiritual care involves facilitating religious rituals and providing spiritual group therapy and religious and spiritual activities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    This systematic overview aimed to review studies investigating the benefits and risks of judo training in older people, and to explore practical methodological applications (Registration ID: CRD42021274825). Searches of EBSCOhost, ISI-WoS, and Scopus databases, with no time restriction up to December 2022, resulted in 23 records meeting the inclusion criteria. A quality assessment was performed through the following tools: ROBINS-I for 10 experimental studies, NIH for 7 observational studies, and AGREE-II for 6 methodological studies. A serious risk of bias emerged for 70% of the experimental studies, whereas 100% of the observational and 67% of the methodological studies presented a \"fair\" quality. When involving 1392 participants (63 ± 12 years; females: 47%), the studies investigated novice (n = 13), amateur/intermediate (n = 4), expert (n = 4), and unknown (n = 3) level judoka by means of device-based, self-reported, and visual evaluation measures. Mean training encompassed 2 ± 1 sessions. week-1 of 61 ± 17 min for 7 ± 6 months. In relation to judo training exposure and outcomes, three main themes emerged: (i) health (56% of studies; e.g., bones, anthropometry, quality of life); (ii) functional fitness (43%; e.g., balance, strength, walking speed); and iii) psychosocial aspects (43%; e.g., fear of falling, cognition, self-efficacy). Although the included studies presented relevant methodological weaknesses, the data support the positive effects of judo training with advancing age. Future research is needed to help coaches plan judo programs for older people.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:针对世界人口老龄化需求的两个研究和开发领域正在蓬勃发展,成功的老化和辅助信息和通信技术(A-ICT)。我们在两种话语中的交流方式中出现的年龄歧视刻板印象的风险早已为人所知。这引发了一个问题,即在“老龄化缺陷”的背景下使用特定的年龄标准是否会导致参与,或遵守,试图避免与年龄相关的耻辱的老年人的研究过程。
    目的:本研究旨在检查受试者招募情况,研究设计(基于年龄>65岁标准),以及健康研究中关于老年人A-ICT负担能力的研究目标和结论的论述。
    方法:使用系统映射方法来表征基本原理,方法,既定目标,以及在PubMed中索引并通过搜索逻辑检索的研究的预期结果([\“老年人”或老年人或老年人]和[ICT或老年技术或\“辅助技术\”)]和(\“健康老龄化\”或\“成功老龄化\”或\“健康老龄化\”或\“成功老龄化\”)。纳入标准如下:研究应招募年龄较大的参与者(年龄>65岁),定性或定量研究,并涉及引入至少一种A-ICT来改善与健康有关的情况。排除标准如下:综述,观点,调查,或使用信息和通信技术进行数据收集而不是生活方式干预的研究。内容,专题,和语篇分析被用来绘制研究特征,并综合研究问题的结果。
    结果:在180项通过搜索逻辑的研究中,31项(17.2%)符合纳入标准(6项随机对照试验,4个纯粹的定量研究,9个焦点小组,2观察性研究,和10项混合方法研究)。除了一种情况,招募是务实和非随机的。对基本原理的主题分析显示,很有可能强调衰老的负担,如护理成本上升(12/31,39%)和年龄相关赤字(14/31,45%)。研究的目标分为4类:促进身体活动,机器人和远程健康监测系统的验收和可行性,风险检测,以及A-ICT在老年人医疗保健中的未来。定性研究更加关注非年龄研究指南。研究结果的异质性(定性和定量)与年龄无关,而与个人机构有关,接受,和坚持。研究策略的组合(参与式,纵向,顽皮,灵活,和基于需求的设计)在表征研究结果的变化方面被证明是成功的。记录招募动态的研究表明,对污名的恐惧是使参与者参与产生偏见的一个因素。
    结论:本综述表明年龄不是招募和保留参与者的信息标准。绘制了采用的动态,和互动,A-ICT对于推进研究和技术开发至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Two fields of research and development targeting the needs of the aging population of the world are flourishing, successful aging and assistive information and communication technologies (A-ICTs). The risks of ageist stereotypes emerging from how we communicate in both discourses are long known. This raises questions about whether using specific age criteria in the context of \"aging deficits\" can bias participation in, or compliance with, the research process by older adults who try to avoid age-related stigma.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine subject recruitment, study designs (based on age >65 years criteria), as well as discourses in research objectives and conclusions in health research on affordances of A-ICTs for older adults.
    METHODS: A systematic mapping approach was used to characterize rationales, methods, stated objectives, and expected outcomes of studies indexed in PubMed and retrieved through the search logic ([\"Older Adults\" OR Seniors OR Elderly] AND [ICT OR gerontechnology OR \"Assistive Technology\")] AND (\"Healthy Aging\" OR \"Successful Aging\" OR \"healthy ageing\" OR \"successful ageing\"). Inclusion criteria were as follows: the study should have recruited older participants (aged >65 years), been qualitative or quantitative research, and involved the introduction of at least one A-ICT for health-related improvements. Exclusion criteria were as follows: reviews, viewpoints, surveys, or studies that used information and communication technology for data collection instead of lifestyle interventions. Content, thematic, and discourse analyses were used to map the study characteristics and synthesize results with respect to the research question.
    RESULTS: Of 180 studies that passed the search logic, 31 (17.2%) satisfied the inclusion criteria (6 randomized controlled trials, 4 purely quantitative studies, 9 focus groups, 2 observational studies, and 10 mixed methods studies). In all but one case, recruitment was pragmatic and nonrandom. Thematic analysis of rationales revealed a high likelihood of emphasis on the burdens of aging, such as rising costs of care (12/31, 39%) and age-related deficits (14/31, 45%). The objectives of the research fell under 4 categories: promotion of physical activity, acceptance and feasibility of robots and remote health monitoring systems, risk detection, and the future of A-ICTs in health care for older adults. Qualitative studies were more attentive to the nonageist research guidelines. Heterogeneity in the study results (both qualitative and quantitative) was not related to age but to individual agency, acceptance, and adherence. A combination of research strategies (participatory, longitudinal, playful, flexible, and need-based designs) proved successful in characterizing variations in study outcomes. Studies that documented recruitment dynamics revealed that fear of stigma was a factor that biased participants\' engagement.
    CONCLUSIONS: This review indicates that age is not an informative criterion for recruitment and retention of participants. Charting the dynamics of adoption of, and interaction with, A-ICTs is critical for advancing research and technology development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    UNASSIGNED:本系统评价的目的是综合研究,检查晚年睡眠与健康衰老之间的横截面和纵向关联。
    UNASSIGNED:通过PubMed和PsychINFO数据库使用与“睡眠”和“健康衰老”相关的术语进行了系统搜索。“研究健康衰老与一个或多个睡眠参数之间的关系的研究包括在本综述中。
    未经评估:14项相关研究,九个横截面和五个纵向,已确定。总的来说,横断面研究显示,睡眠的阳性指标通常与健康衰老的可能性更大相关。相比之下,有限数量的现有纵向研究揭示了混合和不确定的结果.
    UNASSIGNED:研究结果表明,充足的睡眠更有可能与晚年健康衰老的相关标志相一致,并强调需要进一步研究睡眠和健康衰老之间的纵向关联。
    未经评估:健康睡眠,包括适度的睡眠时间和良好的质量,显示出促进健康老龄化的希望。因此,睡眠不佳应该被识别并在必要时进行干预。
    The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize research examining the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between sleep and healthy aging in late-life.
    A systematic search was conducted via both PubMed and PsychINFO databases using terms related to \"sleep\" and \"healthy aging.\" Studies which examined the association between healthy aging and one or more sleep parameters were included in the present review.
    Fourteen relevant studies, nine cross-sectional and five longitudinal, were identified. Overall, cross-sectional studies revealed that positive indicators of sleep were generally associated with a greater likelihood of healthy aging. In contrast, a limited number of existing longitudinal studies revealed mixed and inconclusive results.
    Findings suggest that adequate sleep is more likely to coincide with relevant markers of healthy aging in late-life and underscores the need for additional research investigating the longitudinal associations between sleep and healthy aging.
    Healthy sleep, consisting of moderate sleep duration and good quality, shows promise for the promotion of healthy aging. Consequently, poor sleep should be identified and intervened upon when necessary.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:这项荟萃分析旨在探讨成功衰老(SA)对老年人全因死亡风险的影响,为促进SA提供理论依据。
    方法:PubMed,Embase,CINAHL,CNKI,和WanFang数据库(从2021年3月4日开始)进行队列研究,以评估SA与老年人死亡率之间的关系。随机效应模型用于合成风险比和95%置信区间。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行质量评估。所有统计分析均在STATA16.0中进行。
    结果:总计,来自10项研究的21,158名老年人被纳入当前的系统评价和荟萃分析。SA组的全因死亡风险比非SA组低50%(合并风险比=0.50,95%置信区间:0.35-0.65,P<0.001;I2=58.3%)。老年人全因死亡的风险在健康老化指数(HAI)中每增加一个单位增加17%(I2=0%,P=0.964)。与参照组(HAI0-2)相比,HAI3-4、HAI5-6和HAI7-10的老年人有1.31倍,1.73倍,全因死亡风险增加2.58倍,分别。亚组分析未揭示异质性的可能来源。
    结论:这项荟萃分析表明,患有SA的老年人将全因死亡的风险降低了50%。然而,很少进行干预研究。因此,医疗保健提供者必须意识到SA与死亡风险之间的关系,并积极开发帮助老年人实现SA的干预方法。
    BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aimed to explore the effect of successful aging (SA) on all-cause mortality risk in older people to provide a theoretical basis for promoting SA.
    METHODS: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI, and WanFang databases (inception to March 4, 2021) were searched for cohort studies to evaluate the relationship between SA and mortality in older people. A random-effects model was used to synthesis hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. All statistical analyses were conducted in STATA 16.0.
    RESULTS: In total, 21,158 older adults from 10 studies were included in the current systematic review and meta-analysis. The SA group tended to have 50% lower risk of all-cause mortality than the non-SA group (pooled hazard ratio = 0.50, 95% confidence intervals: 0.35-0.65, P < 0.001; I 2 = 58.3%). The risk of all-cause mortality in older people increased by 17% for each unit increment in the healthy aging index (HAI) (I 2 = 0%, P = 0.964). Compared with the reference group (HAI 0-2), older people with HAI 3-4, HAI 5-6, and HAI 7-10 had 1.31-fold, 1.73-fold, and 2.58-fold greater risk of all-cause mortality, respectively. Subgroup analysis did not reveal possible sources of heterogeneity.
    CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that older adults with SA reduced the risk of all-cause mortality by 50%. However, few interventional studies have been conducted. Therefore, healthcare providers must be aware of the relationship between SA and mortality risk and actively develop intervention methods for helping old people achieve SA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号