An increasing number of new psychoactive substances (NPS), such as designer benzodiazepines, are becoming available on the recreational drug market. These are new unregistered substances and thereby an attempt to evade legislation. Often there is very limited clinical information available regarding these NPS, which could result in undesirable clinical outcomes in the management of intoxications, dependencies and withdrawals following NPS use. In this case report we describe a 23-year-old woman, who was admitted to our residential addiction care facility for the detoxification of the designer benzodiazepine bromazolam. Her daily use of 6 mg bromazolam was converted to 20 mg diazepam. Although we expected a higher dose would have been needed, 20 mg was sufficient and was tapered without complications. This case report demonstrates the safe conversion of 6 mg of bromazolam to 20 mg of diazepam by combining the use of fixed-dose and symptom-triggered-dose regimens. More clinical data is necessary to formulate advisory management for the detoxification of bromazolam and other designer benzodiazepines.

There has been an increasing focus on deprescribing in psychiatry recently, particularly of antipsychotic medication, with recognition that not all patients with psychotic disorders require lifelong medication. We summarize some empirical and theoretical papers, and examine case studies to provide instruction on this topic.
Recent studies have found that slower tapering (over months or longer) of antipsychotics is associated with a lower relapse rate than quicker tapering (weeks). Case studies presented suggest that the process of reduction is associated with the precipitation or exacerbation of psychotic symptoms and that a slower process of reduction may minimize this effect. This may be because faster reductions cause greater disruption of homeostatic equilibria, provoking psychotic symptoms either as direct withdrawal symptoms or consequences of nonpsychotic withdrawal symptoms (e.g. insomnia) - although not all patients will experience withdrawal symptoms. This suggests that smaller dose reductions, especially at lower doses, made very gradually, may minimize the risk of psychotic symptoms.
Slower tapering of antipsychotics may provide time for adaptations made to the presence of the medications to resolve, thus reducing the disruption to homeostatic equilibrium caused by dose reduction, potentially reducing the risk of relapse. Exacerbation of psychotic symptoms on antipsychotic reduction may not represent evidence of the need for a higher dose of antipsychotic on a long-term basis but may indicate the need for more gradual reduction. Gradual reduction of antipsychotics, especially after long-term use in clinical practice is prudent.

We report a case of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) during treatment for alcohol withdrawal syndrome with gabapentin and clonidine. The patient developed severe hypertension, confusion and tremor, culminating in bilateral vision loss and a seizure. Imaging revealed posterior cerebral edema. Treatment with benzodiazepines, antihypertensives, and anti-seizure medications led to resolution. One year later, imaging showed resolution of the findings. We review the associated literature and propose the recognition of a PRES sub-entity, Alcohol-Related PRES (ARPRES), which can appear in the setting of alcohol withdrawal syndrome, chronic alcohol use, and acute alcohol intoxication, with or without hypertension.

Anticholinergic-induced cognitive impairment may be partially reversible upon cessation. A barrier to deprescribing of anticholinergics is the unknown risk of anticholinergic adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWE), with only limited information available on the incidence, timing and severity of anticholinergic ADWE. We report the case of a 76-year-old woman who experienced significant cognitive improvement following deprescribing long-term use of a strong anticholinergic drug, doxepin, and dose reduction of another possible anticholinergic agent. The patient decided to abruptly stop taking doxepin, despite a planned careful taper with twice weekly monitoring, but did not experience any severe anticholinergic ADWE and subsequently had significantly improved cognitive function. Future research should focus on better understanding the risk of anticholinergic ADWE so that anticholinergic deprescribing decisions, including how often and by how much to taper, can be made confidently and safely.

Zoledronate, a bisphosphonate, is a potent first-line treatment for osteoporosis. It is also a preferred treatment for hypercalcemia especially when unresponsive to intravenous fluids. Bisphosphonates can cause acute phase reactions that mimic opioid withdrawal symptoms, which can confound provider decision-making. Our case highlights cognitive bias involving a patient with opioid use disorder who received zoledronate for hypercalcemia secondary to immobilization and significant bone infection.
A 41-year-old male is admitted with a past medical history of active intravenous opioid use complicated by group A streptococcal bacteremia with L5-S1 discitis and osteomyelitis, L2-L3 osteomyelitis, and left ankle abscess/septic arthritis status post left ankle washout. His pain was well-controlled by acute pain service with ketamine infusion (discontinued earlier), opioids, acetaminophen, buprenorphine-naloxone, cyclobenzaprine, gabapentin, and naproxen. Intravenous opioids were discontinued, slightly decreasing the opioid regimen. A day later, the patient reported tachycardia, diaphoresis, myalgias, and chills, which the primary team reconsulted acute pain service for opioid withdrawal. However, the patient received a zoledronate infusion for hypercalcemia, on the same day intravenous opioids were discontinued. He had no other medications known to cause withdrawal-like symptoms per chart review. Therefore, it was suspected that an acute phase reaction occurred, commonly seen within a few days of bisphosphonate use.
Zoledronate, well known for causing acute phase reactions, was likely the cause of withdrawal-like symptoms. Acute phase reactions with bisphosphonates mostly occur in the first infusion, and the incidence decreases with subsequent infusions. Symptoms typically occur 24-72 h post-infusion, and last at most for 72 h. Cognitive bias led the primary team to be concerned with opioid withdrawal rather than investigating other causes for the patient\'s presentation. Therefore, providers should thoroughly investigate potential etiologies and rule them out accordingly to provide the best care. Health care providers should also be aware of the implicit biases that potentially impact the quality of care they provide to patients.

Tizanidine, an α2-adrenergic receptor agonist commonly prescribed as a muscle relaxant, has been associated with limited cases of acute intoxication or withdrawal. Here, we present a case of tizanidine withdrawal in a woman in her 40s who presented with an unusual combination of systemic and neurological symptoms. These included hallucinations, decorticate posture, limb and eyelid tremors, along with hypertension, tachycardia and tachypnoea. The diagnosis of tizanidine withdrawal was established by a comprehensive assessment of the patient\'s medical history and the systematic exclusion of other potential diseases. Our approach to managing the withdrawal symptoms was to initiate symptomatic treatment with a combination of a beta-blocker and a calcium channel blocker. Remarkably, this intervention successfully resolved both vital signs and neurological manifestations by the following day. In conclusion, tizanidine withdrawal is associated with a distinct and diagnostically significant neurological syndrome characterised by hallucinations, decorticate posture, tremors and hypersympathetic vital signs.

BACKGROUND: Withdrawal syndrome (WDS) has been described after discontinuation of antipsychotics. WDS could be the consequence of an over-activation of the dopaminergic pathway. Antipsychotics with a higher affinity for dopamine D2 receptors could be associated with a higher risk of WDS. This study aims to address this statement and evaluate the risk difference for withdrawal syndrome between antipsychotics based on pharmacovigilance data.
METHODS: We collected individual reports registered in Vigibase® between 01/01/2000 and 31/12/2022 of patients treated with antipsychotics and who had presented WDS. A disproportionality analysis was performed to evaluate the risk of reporting WDS with each antipsychotic compared to all other antipsychotics. We performed a correlation analysis to assess the correlation between the risk of reporting WDS for each antipsychotic in relation with their pKi for D2 and 5HT2A receptors.
RESULTS: The most frequent psychiatric withdrawal symptoms after antipsychotic discontinuation were insomnia, anxiety and depression. Tremor, headache and dizziness were among the most frequently reported neurologic withdrawal symptoms. Tiotixene had the highest risk of reporting WDS (ROR 7.08; 95%CI 3.49 - 14.35) followed by pimozide (ROR 4.35; 95%CI 1.93 - 9.77), quetiapine (ROR 4.24; 95%CI 3.87 - 4.64), thioridazine (ROR 4.17; 95%CI 2.50-6.98) and ziprasidone (ROR 2.98; 95%CI 2.41-3.67). We found a poor correlation between D2/5HT2A binding affinity and the risk of reporting withdrawal syndrome (R2 = 0,094).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that there might be a risk difference for WDS between antipsychotics. Tiotixene, pimozide and quetiapine were associated with a higher risk of reporting a WDS whereas this risk was lower with chlorpromazine, clozapine and fluphenazine. We could not address the issue of withdrawal psychosis, withdrawal dyskinesia, rebound psychosis or supersensitivity psychosis due to the lack of specific WHO medDRA coded terms to identify potential cases.

BACKGROUND: Gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB) is used illicitly for its sedative hypnotic effects, and those who take it regularly are at risk of developing a substance use disorder. Withdrawal from GHB can include severe symptoms that may require medical management. For GHB use and withdrawal during pregnancy, there are no evidence- or practice-based guidelines to follow, and there is only minimal research literature.
METHODS: We present the case of a 32-year-old woman, G1P0 at 29 weeks and 6 days of gestation, admitted to the perinatal unit at a tertiary hospital for GHB withdrawal management and stabilization. GHB withdrawal was managed with a combination of baclofen and diazepam. We report the dosing and tapering of these medications throughout her 14-day admission. Withdrawal symptoms were well managed with this medication protocol, and she did not experience any features of complicated withdrawal. The patient later presented to hospital in preterm labor and precipitously delivered a healthy, preterm infant male at 34 weeks and 5 days of gestation. At 7 months postpartum, the patient continued to engage with perinatal addiction service, reported no use of GHB since her admission, and was parenting her healthy son.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of guidelines for managing GHB withdrawal in pregnancy. This case demonstrates good clinical outcomes administering a short-term combination of diazepam and baclofen during the third trimester of pregnancy. This case helps to fill a gap in the literature and may inform future research or clinical decision-making in similar situations.

OBJECTIVE: The decision to initiate pharmacotherapy for alcohol withdrawal is typically based on examining self-reported use of alcohol and symptoms of withdrawal. Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a biomarker that could aim in clinical decision-making in withdrawal management.
METHODS: This report describes three cases highlighting the potential clinical utility of PEth in caring for individuals at risk for alcohol withdrawal.
RESULTS: Two of the cases received phenobarbital when their PEth showed that the risk of withdrawal was low and one case where PEth could have shown this was needed. The results were only available in a delayed fashion, however, could have been useful in informing clinical care.
CONCLUSIONS: PEth can be a useful tool if available without delay. PEth can be used to quickly rule out alcohol withdrawal and avoid misdiagnoses and prolonged hospital stays.
CONCLUSIONS: This is a clinical case study available looking at PEth and withdrawal in hospitalized patients. It proposes that PEth can be used as a way to quickly rule out alcohol withdrawal to avoid misdiagnoses and the possibility of a prolonged hospital stay.

BACKGROUND: Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) is a parasomnia characterised by the loss of REM sleep muscle atonia and the enactment of dreams. Acute RBD associated with alcohol withdrawal syndrome is known, but the studies are limited, particularly on its neurobiological underpinnings and management alongside the withdrawal state. This work attempts to address this using a case study and relevant literature review.
METHODS: A 40-year-old male with alcohol dependence (for 20 years) reported new-onset terrifying nightmares and violent behaviours in his sleep precipitated by alcohol withdrawal states for the last 18 months. The polysomnographic finding of REM-without-atonia supported the diagnosis of RBD. He was treated with chlordiazepoxide 100 mg/day (gradually tapered and stopped) and thiamine supplements. Post-discharge, he remained abstinent and symptom-free during the three months of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: RBD related to alcohol withdrawal syndrome has been previously described in a few anecdotal reports. Sudden withdrawal from central nervous system suppressants like alcohol is hypothesised to cause a homeostatic imbalance in gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) pathways and \'REM rebound\', resulting in the clinical and polysomnographic picture of RBD. Benzodiazepines have been found to be useful in both RBD and alcohol withdrawal.
CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol withdrawal syndrome may present with acute RBD, which can be treated with a short course of benzodiazepine. However, further studies are needed to explore the long-term course of RBD in these patients.