Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), and particularly diabetic-related foot infections (DFI), present diagnostic and therapeutic complexities, often leading to severe complications. This study aims to evaluate the in vitro efficacy of cefditoren and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid against typical DFI pathogens. Clinical samples from 40 patients with mild SSTIs were analyzed, revealing a predominance of Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. species. Cefditoren exhibited activity against 90% of isolates, with superior potency over amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. These findings underscore the utility of cefditoren in empirical treatment of DFI, although a larger sample size would be desirable for further validation.

People who inject drugs are frequently colonized with Staphylococcus aureus and have an increased risk for skin and soft tissue infections. This longitudinal study aims to describe S. aureus carriage in this group and the risk for infections during a 1-year follow-up. We included 61 participants from the Malmö Needle Exchange Program. Mapping of S. aureus carriage was conducted by screening cultures every third month and S. aureus growth was semi-quantified. Data regarding infections and living conditions were collected from structured interviews. Statistics included univariate analysis with the Fischer\'s exact test, univariate logistic regression and multivariate logistic regression. S. aureus carriage was detected in 46-63% of participants, and 75% reported one or more infections during the study period. Self-reported infections were associated with carriage in perineum (OR 5.08 [95% CI 1.45-17.73]), in skin lesions (OR 1.48 [95% CI 1.21-1.81]), and unstable housing situation (OR 12.83 [95% CI 1.56-105.81]). Thus, people who inject drugs are frequent carriers of S. aureus and report a surprisingly high prevalence of skin and soft tissue infections. Homeless people and those with skin carriage seem to be at highest risk. Effective clinical interventions are needed, aiming at preventing infections in this vulnerable group.

OBJECTIVE: Necrotizing soft-tissue infection and necrotizing fasciitis of the upper limb are infrequent. Studies are rare, and often include other anatomical regions. The specificities and particularities of this pathology are not well known. The aim of this study was to report diagnosis and treatment aspects.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted over 10 years on every patient treated for necrotizing fasciitis of the upper limb with clinical, bacteriological and histological confirmation. One hundred ninety-eight items were extracted for each patient concerning clinical, biological, radiological and therapeutic data.
RESULTS: During 10 years, 24 patients were diagnosed with necrotizing fasciitis of the upper limb: 18 males, 6 females; mean age, 59.9 years; mean body mass index, 25. Local erythema, pain and fever were the most frequent symptoms. Skin necrosis was present in fewer than 40% of patients. Sixteen cases (66.6%) had prior skin lesions and/or an entry point on the limb. Ten had non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescription before acute symptom onset (42%), requiring intensive care unit admission. Treatment comprised surgical resection, resuscitative measures, antibiotic therapy and reconstructive surgery. Seven patients (30.4%) had 1 session of cutaneous excision, and the others had more than 2. Microbiological analysis found mono-microbial beta-hemolytic group A streptococci (BHGAS) infection in 14 patients (58.4%). Antibiotics were prescribed in 91% of cases before surgery, and in 100% after. The most frequently prescribed substance was clindamycin (18 patients, 75%). Ten patients (42%) stayed in the intensive care unit during treatment. Seventeen patients (70.8%) had thin skin graft reconstruction, including 50% with dermal substitute. Five patients (20.8%) had partial upper limb amputation. Two patients (8.3%) died in the 30 days following diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The death rate in necrotizing fasciitis of the upper limb was rather low but the amputation rate was higher than in other locations. This study shows the specific clinical, biological and treatment features of this rare but serious pathology of the upper limb.

A proposal for a large, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial investigating the role of hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) in necrotising soft tissue infections (NSTI) has led to much discussion locally and internationally about whether participation is ethical for a centre where stakeholders already consider HBOT standard practice. This article systematically addresses the concept of clinical equipoise specific to the role of HBOT in NSTI, and presents a series of considerations to be taken into account by key stakeholders at potential participating sites.

BACKGROUND: New skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) guidelines were published in 2019 in France, changing the recommended duration for antibiotic treatment. The objective of the present study was to assess the impact of the publication of the 2019 French guidelines on SSTIs on the duration of antibiotic prescription for erysipelas.
METHODS: In a before-after study (a year before and a year after April 1st, 2019), we included all adult patients diagnosed with erysipelas in Reims University Hospital medical wards and the emergency department. We retrospectively retrieved antibiotic prescription duration in the patients\' medical files.
RESULTS: Among 50 patients in the \"before\" and 39 in the \"after\" group, the mean duration of antibiotic prescription was significantly shorter in the \"after\" group (9.4 ± 2.8 vs. 12.4 ± 3.8 days, p = 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: A 25% decrease in the duration of antibiotic prescription for erysipelas was observed following the implementation of these guidelines, providing useful information for an antibiotic stewardship policy.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the usefulness of ultrasonography for differentiating soft tissue infections with or without osteomyelitis in pediatric patients who underwent ultrasonography and subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
METHODS: Twenty-three patients were classified into 2 groups: 12 patients with and 11 patients without osteomyelitis based on MRI. Osteomyelitis using ultrasound is characterized by the presence of bone cortex irregularity and/or subperiosteal abscess formation. The diagnostic performance of ultrasonography for detecting osteomyelitis and subperiosteal abscess formation was compared with that of MRI. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: Of 12 osteomyelitis cases, 11 had abnormal bone marrow enhancement (one residual case did not undergo contrast enhancement study) and 5 had subperiosteal abscesses. The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for osteomyelitis was 82.6% (number of correct diagnosis of osteomyelitis/total number = 19/23; 95% CI, 61.2-95.0) and for detecting periosteal abscess was 95.7% (number of correct diagnosis of periosteal abscess/total number = 22/23; 95% CI, 78.1-99.9), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography for detecting osteomyelitis were 66.7% (95% CI, 34.9-90.1) and 100% (95% CI, 71.5-100), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography for detecting periosteal abscess were 80% (95% CI, 28.4-99.5), and 100% (95% CI, 81.5-100), respectively. One-third of osteomyelitis cases could not be detected using ultrasonography.
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonography may be useful for diagnosing osteomyelitis in pediatric patients; however, the technique appears limited by low sensitivity. However, it is more accurate for diagnosis of periosteal abscess in these patients.

Background and Objectives: Anaerobic bacteria like Fusobacterium can lead to severe and life-threatening infections. The inherent complexities in the isolation of these bacteria may result in diagnostic and therapeutic delays, thereby escalating both morbidity and mortality rates. We aimed to examine data from patients with infections due to Fusobacterium to gain insights into the epidemiology and clinical outcomes of patients with these infections. Methods and Results: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from a cohort of patients with cultures positive for Fusobacterium species at a tertiary care medical center in the United States. Between 2009 and 2015, we identified 96 patients with cultures positive for Fusobacterium. Patients could be categorized into three groups based on the site of primary infection. Patients with head and neck infections constituted 37% (n 36). Patients with infections of other soft tissue sites accounted for 38.5% (n 37). Patients with anaerobic bacteremia due to Fusobacterium formed 24% (n 23) of the cohort. Surgical intervention coupled with antibiotic therapy emerged as cornerstones of management for patients with head and neck or other soft tissue infections, who generally exhibited more favorable outcomes. Patients with bacteremia were older, more likely to have malignancy, and had a high mortality rate. When speciation was available, Fusobacterium necrophorum was the most frequently isolated species. Conclusions: Our retrospective analysis of epidemiology and clinical outcomes of Fusobacterium infections revealed three distinct cohorts. Patients with head, neck, or soft tissue infections had better outcomes than those with bacteremia. Our findings highlight the importance of employing management strategies based on infection site and underlying comorbidities in patients with Fusobacterium infections. Further research is needed to investigate the optimal therapeutic strategies and identify prognostic indicators to improve clinical outcomes for these complex infections.

暂无摘要。

Previous studies have mainly focused on outpatient cases of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), with limited attention to inpatient occurrences. Thus, we aimed to compare the clinical parameters of inpatients with SSTIs, performed genomic characterization, and determined the subtypes of Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL) bacteriophages of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from these patients. We found that PVL-positive patients had shorter hospital stays (mean, 9 vs. 24 days; p < 0.001) and abscess resolution durations (mean, 8 vs. 13 days; p < 0.01). PVL-positive MRSA-induced SSTIs were more frequently associated with abscesses [36/55 (65.5%) vs. 15/124 (12.1%), p < 0.001], with 52.7% undergoing incision and drainage; over 80% of PVL-negative patients received incision, drainage, and antibiotics. In PVL-positive patients receiving empirical antibiotics, anti-staphylococcal agents such as vancomycin and linezolid were administered less frequently (32.7%, 18/55) than in PVL-negative patients (74.2%, 92/124), indicating that patients with PVL-positive SSTIs are more likely to require surgical drainage rather than antimicrobial treatment. We also found that the ST59 lineage was predominant, regardless of PVL status (41.3%, 74/179). Additionally, we investigated the linear structure of the lukSF-PV gene, revealing that major clusters were associated with specific STs, suggesting independent acquisition of PVL by different strain types and indicating that significant diversity was observed even within PVL-positive strains detected in the same facility. Overall, our study provides comprehensive insights into the clinical, genetic, and phage-related aspects of MRSA-induced SSTIs in hospitalized patients and contributes to a more profound understanding of the epidemiology and evolution of these pathogens in the Chinese population.

BACKGROUND: Necrotising fasciitis is a rare and fulminant soft tissue infection. Prompt surgical debridement of the involved soft tissues and necrotic fascia is its definitive treatment, with any delay associated with increased mortality. The LRINEC score is a scoring system initially designed to aid in early diagnosis of necrotising fasciitis to facilitate early surgical intervention. This score utilizes common biochemical tests to produce a score of 0-13, stratifying patients into risk categories.
METHODS: A prospective cohort study was designed including all patients presenting with severe soft tissue infection from June 2011 to January 2014. Exclusion criteria included: less than 15 years or above 90 years, antibiotics within 48 h of presentation or prior debridement of their soft tissue infection. All patients underwent routine blood investigations, required for calculation of the LRINEC score.
RESULTS: The positive predictive value of the LRINEC score was 95.42%, whilst the negative predictive value was 81.16%. There was a statistically significant correlation between white cell count, serum creatinine, blood glucose level and positive histopathology. The mortality rate for patients with histopathologically-confirmed necrotising fasciitis was 10%.
CONCLUSIONS: The LRINEC score is a clinical adjunct to risk stratify patients presenting to the emergency department with soft tissue infections. It utilizes common blood tests commonly to calculate a score, which risk stratifies patients. The use of this scoring system can facilitate better allocation of resources and aids in the decision to transfer patients in rural or regional settings, which are often complicated by being a resource limited environment.