Social Welfare

社会福利
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在新加坡,吸毒是一个高度污名化和犯罪化的问题,对个人面临的挑战了解有限,尤其是性少数男性,在他们从物质依赖或成瘾中恢复过来的过程中。这项定性研究旨在调查吸毒背后的驱动力,导致戒毒的因素,以及影响恢复过程的因素。
    方法:数据来自2020年1月至2022年5月由TheGreenhouseCommunityServicesLimited提供的临床记录。这些记录包含来自四种不同形式的信息:摄入评估,进度说明,结案摘要,和护理计划审查。采用主题分析来识别和分类数据中重复出现的主题。
    结果:对受益人(n=125)的数据进行了分析,得出了一系列与药物使用促进者有关的主题,停止吸毒的动机,并管理一个人正在进行的恢复。在吸毒的促进者中,确定了两个子主题:(a)解决创伤和触发因素;(b)管理情绪.此外,管理一个人的恢复有四个重要的子主题:(a)发现个人身份,(b)失去动力和动力,(c)克服障碍,(d)准备善后护理。
    结论:该研究为持续复苏管理的动态提供了宝贵的见解,为干预措施提供潜在的途径,可以在克服物质依赖的过程中加强对个人的支持。加强心理教育和促进同伴支持有可能促进康复过程。显然,需要采取整体方法来解决这些涉及我们社会的复杂问题。
    BACKGROUND: In Singapore, where drug use is a highly stigmatized and criminalized issue, there is limited understanding of the challenges faced by individuals, particularly sexual minority men, in their journey towards recovery from substance dependence or addiction. This qualitative study aimed to investigate the driving forces behind drug use, the factors contributing to drug cessation, and the elements influencing the recovery process.
    METHODS: Data were extracted from clinical records provided by  The Greenhouse Community Services Limited between January 2020 to May 2022. These records encompassed information from four distinct forms: the intake assessment, progress notes, case closing summary, and the care plan review. Thematic analysis was employed to identify and categorize recurring themes within the data.
    RESULTS: Data from beneficiaries (n = 125) were analyzed and yielded a series of themes related to facilitators of drug use, motivations to cease drug use, and managing one\'s ongoing recovery. Within the facilitators of drug use, two sub-themes were identified: (a) addressing trauma and triggers and (b) managing emotions. Additionally, managing one\'s recovery was marked by four significant sub-themes: (a) uncovering personal identities, (b) losing motivation and drive, (c) overcoming obstacles, and (d) preparing for aftercare.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study contributes valuable insights into the dynamics of ongoing recovery management, offering potential avenues for interventions that could enhance support for individuals in their journey to overcome substance dependence. Enhancing psychoeducation and fostering peer support have the potential to facilitate the recovery process. Clearly, a holistic approach is needed to address these complex issues that cuts across our societies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:数字服务可以成为治疗非传染性疾病的有效和具有成本效益的选择,但由于治疗效果不均匀,其普适性有限。这篇综述旨在评估数字服务对人口健康的影响,成本,以及患者和医疗保健专业人员的满意度,并确定在医疗保健和社会福利中使用数字服务的促进者和障碍。
    方法:本研究方案于2022年9月4日注册到国际前瞻性系统审查登记册,PROSPERO(CRD420223555635)。审查是利用审查和传播中心进行的,科克伦,OvidMedline,Scopus,和WebofScience在2022年6月。对纳入的审评的方法学质量进行了评估。数字服务的影响被归类为没有证据,没有优势,以及混合和积极的影响。归纳内容分析用于识别促进者和障碍。
    结果:本综述共纳入66项研究,其中64%被评价为高质量。尚未确定有关数字服务对社会福利影响的研究。65%的评论评估了数字服务对人口健康的影响,具有混合效应;21%的成本具有混合效应;27%的患者对积极效应的满意度;7.6%的医疗保健专业人员对混合效应的满意度。各种功能,分配,最终用户支持,有组织的服务,和服务发展促进了数字服务的使用。相应地,障碍与服务限制有关,数字能力,资金和服务策略,资源和变更管理。
    结论:与常规护理相比,数字服务对人群健康和成本的影响喜忧参半,患者满意度高.混合医疗保健专业人员的满意度与数字服务的使用有关,研究较少。为了确保数字服务的成功实施和可持续性,必须注意解决各级障碍和支持促进者。
    BACKGROUND: Digital services can be effective and cost-efficient options for treating non-communicable diseases, but generalizability is limited due to heterogeneous treatment effects. This umbrella review aims to evaluate the impact of digital services on population health, costs, and patient and healthcare professional satisfaction, and to identify facilitators and barriers to using digital services in healthcare and social welfare.
    METHODS: The protocol of the study was registered on the 4th of September 2022 to the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO (CRD42022355635). The review was performed using the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Cochrane, Ovid Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science in June 2022. The methodological quality of the included reviews was assessed. The impact of digital services was categorized as no evidence, no dominance, and mixed and positive effect. Inductive content analysis was used to identify facilitators and barriers.
    RESULTS: A total of 66 studies were included in the review, 64 % of which were evaluated as high quality. Studies on the impact of digital services in social welfare were not identified. Sixty-five percent of reviews evaluated the impact of digital services on population health with mixed effects; 21 % were on costs with mixed effects; 27 % were on patient satisfaction with positive effects; and 7.6 % were on healthcare professionals\' satisfaction with mixed effects. Various features, allocation, end-user support, organized services, and service development facilitated the use of digital services. Correspondingly, barriers were related to service limitations, digital competency, funding- and service strategies, resources and change management.
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared to usual care, digital services had a mixed impact on population health and costs with high satisfaction in patients. Mixed healthcare professionals\' satisfaction was associated with the use of digital services, and it was less studied. To ensure successful implementation and sustainability of digital services, attention must be paid to address barriers and supporting facilitators at all levels.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在欧洲,青少年因吸毒而死亡的情况令人担忧。到目前为止,人们对年轻人可以获得哪些物质使用服务知之甚少。经常使用家庭外护理安置,但仅靠干预青年使用有问题的药物是不够的。需要额外的干预措施。
    目的:这篇叙述性综述调查了已经做了什么,什么管用,以及从社会服务的角度来看,北欧国家在处理青年物质使用方面需要什么。这项研究汇集了北欧以前关于这一主题的研究,并向更广泛的国际受众介绍了北欧社会福利制度中青年物质使用的反应。
    方法:对ProQuest和EBSCOhost数据库的搜索显示,在17篇论文中报道了7种干预措施。使用叙事合成。
    结果:干预措施包括大麻停药计划(CCP),冰岛版本的“改变青少年库存的动机”,挪威多系统治疗计划(MST),在瑞典玛丽亚诊所实施的结构化面试手册UngDOK,芬兰基于ADSUME的学校医疗保健干预,以及瑞典彗星12-18和ParentStep13-17程序。许多干预措施起源于美国,而不是北欧国家,其中大多数干预措施是在缺乏青年特异性时从成人干预措施中改编而来的。父母的参与被认为很重要,但在不涉及青少年自己的情况下无效。需要从儿童的最大利益的角度重新考虑与年轻罪犯打交道的干预措施和方法。当前的研究侧重于普遍预防,而需要更多关于选择性和指示性预防的知识。
    结论:关于停止有问题的青少年物质使用和随后在社会服务中的康复,人们还不够了解。我们鼓励对多生产者系统进行进一步研究,订阅者-提供者-青年物质使用服务合作,社会服务中的非医学青年特定物质使用干预措施,和康复青少年毒品犯罪的做法。
    Youth mortality from drugs is worryingly increasing in Europe. Little is so far known about what substance use services are available to young people. An out-of-home care placement is often used but does not suffice alone as an intervention in problematic substance use among youth. Additional interventions are needed.
    This narrative review investigated what has been done, what works, and what is needed in treating youth substance use in the Nordic countries from the viewpoint of social services. This study brought together previous Nordic studies on this topic and presented responses to youth substance use in Nordic social welfare system to the wider international audience.
    A search of the ProQuest and EBSCOhost databases revealed seven interventions reported in 17 papers. Narrative synthesis was used.
    Interventions included the Cannabis Cessation Program (CCP), the Icelandic version of the Motivation to Change Inventory for Adolescents, the Norwegian multisystemic therapy program (MST), the Structured Interview Manual UngDOK implemented in the Swedish Maria clinics, the Finnish ADSUME-based intervention in school health care, and the Swedish Comet 12-18 and ParentStep 13-17 programs. Many interventions had originated in the US rather than in the Nordic countries and most of them were adapted from adult interventions when youth specificity was lacking. Parental involvement was deemed important, but ineffective without involving the adolescent themself. Interventions and ways for dealing with young offenders required reconsideration from the perspective of the best interests of the child. The current research focuses on universal prevention while more knowledge about selective and indicative prevention was called for.
    Not enough is known about the cessation of problematic youth substance use and subsequent rehabilitation in social services. We would encourage further research on the multi-producer system, subscriber-provider-cooperation in youth substance use services, non-medical youth-specific substance use interventions in social services, and rehabilitative juvenile drug offense practices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:结核病是一种传染病,受与贫困和社会排斥周期密切相关的社会决定因素的强烈影响。在此背景下,为受疾病影响的人提供社会保护是减少不平等、加强包容和社会正义的有力工具。这项研究旨在确定和综合旨在确保社会保护作为结核病患者权利的战略和措施。
    方法:这是一个范围审查,2023年2月在六个数据库中进行了搜索。我们纳入了从2015年起阐明旨在保障健康权的社会保护战略和措施的出版物,营养,employment,收入,住房,社会援助,和受结核病影响的人的社会保障。这些战略可以通过政策来实施,programs,和/或任何特定情况下的政府协议。从文章中提取的数据进行了描述性分析,并根据社会保护的维度对发现进行了叙述性综合。此外,我们制定了一个概念框架,说明与本次审查中确定的社会保护各方面相关的措施和战略的组织和运作方面。
    结果:从数据库中检索到9317种出版物,其中包括63种出版物。该研究的结果强调了与结核病患者的社会保护有关的措施和策略。这些措施和战略围绕着获得适当营养和营养的权利,收入,住房,和健康保险,以及包括社会援助和社会福利在内的扩大的权利。据报告,确保这些权利有助于改善结核病患者的营养状况和生活质量,在降低灾难性成本的同时,扩大获得医疗干预和服务的机会,并促进结核病治疗的依从性,从而导致更高的结核病治愈率。
    结论:我们的研究结果将社会保护措施确定为结核病患者的权利,并有可能通过结核病控制项目与政府实体之间的合作来指导基于证据的社会和卫生政策的制定。
    BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis is an infectious disease strongly influenced by social determinants closely associated with cycles of poverty and social exclusion. Within this context, providing social protection for people affected by the disease constitutes a powerful instrument for reducing inequalities and enhancing inclusion and social justice. This study aimed to identify and synthesize strategies and measures aimed at ensuring social protection as a right of people affected by tuberculosis.
    METHODS: This is a scoping review, with searches conducted in six databases in February 2023. We included publications from 2015 onwards that elucidate strategies and measures of social protection aimed at safeguarding the rights to health, nutrition, employment, income, housing, social assistance, and social security for people affected by tuberculosis. These strategies could be implemented through policies, programs, and/or governmental agreements in any given context. The data extracted from the articles underwent descriptive analysis and a narrative synthesis of findings based on the dimensions of social protection. Additionally, we developed a conceptual framework illustrating the organizational and operational aspects of measures and strategies related to each dimension of social protection identified in this review.
    RESULTS: A total of 9317 publications were retrieved from the databases, of which sixty-three publications were included. The study\'s results highlighted measures and strategies concerning the social protection of people affected by tuberculosis. These measures and strategies revolved around the rights to proper nutrition and nourishment, income, housing, and health insurance, as well as expanded rights encompassing social assistance and social welfare. It was reported that ensuring these rights contributes to improving nutritional status and the quality of life for individuals with tuberculosis, along with reducing catastrophic costs, expanding access to healthcare interventions and services, and fostering TB treatment adherence, thereby leading to higher rates of TB cure.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings identify social protection measures as a right for people affected by tuberculosis and have the potential to guide the development of evidence-based social and health policies through collaboration between tuberculosis control programs and governmental entities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定引发公平-效率权衡的研究方法和结果的差异,这些权衡可以为医疗保健资源分配的公平信息成本效益分析提供信息。
    方法:我们搜索了Ovid(Medline),EconLit,和Scopus在6月25日之前,2021年。纳入标准为:(1)同行评审或(2)灰色文献;(3)以英文发表;(4)基于调查;(5)对社会福利函数进行参数化,以量化不平等厌恶或(6)在卫生干预措施的公平和效率特征中进行权衡。排除标准是:(1)不进行权衡的研究或(2)理论研究。我们抽象了学习方法的细节,结果,和限制。研究按以下方法分组:(1)社会福利函数或(2)偏好排名和分配权重。我们分别描述每个方法类别的发现。
    结果:包括77篇论文,28个参数化的社会福利函数和49个被分类为偏好排名和分配权重。研究方法是异质的。研究在29个国家进行。样品大小和组成各不相同,调查方法和问题框架也是如此。对股权的偏好喜忧参半。在这两种方法类别中:39项研究被归类为不平等厌恶的明确证据;33项发现混合证据;4项没有厌恶的证据。发现了研究之间和研究内异质性的证据。公平偏好可能因性别而异,职业,政治意识形态,收入,和教育。
    结论:研究方法的巨大差异限制了研究结果的直接可比性及其在公平知情成本效益分析中的应用。未来的研究需要使用代表性样本来探索国家内部和国家之间的异质性。
    To identify differences in the approaches and results of studies that elicit equity-efficiency trade-offs that can inform equity-informative cost-effectiveness analysis for healthcare resource allocation.
    We searched Ovid (Medline), EconLit, and Scopus prior to June 25, 2021. Inclusion criteria were: (1) peer-reviewed or (2) gray literature; (3) published in English; (4) survey-based; (5) parameterized a social welfare function to quantify inequality aversion or (6) elicited a trade-off in equity and efficiency characteristics of health interventions. Exclusion criteria were: (1) studies that did not conduct a trade-off or (2) theoretical studies. We abstracted details on study methods, results, and limitations. Studies were grouped by following approach: (1) social welfare function or (2) preference ranking and distributional weighting. We described findings separately for each approach category.
    Seventy-seven papers were included, 28 parameterized social welfare functions and 49 were classified as preference ranking and distributional weighting. Study methods were heterogeneous. Studies were conducted across 29 countries. Sample sizes and composition, survey methods and question framing varied. Preferences for equity were mixed. Across both approach categories: 39 studies were classified as clear evidence of inequality aversion; 33 found mixed evidence; and 4 had no evidence of aversion. Evidence of between and within-study heterogeneity was found. Preferences for equity may differ by gender, profession, political ideology, income, and education.
    Substantial variability in study methods limit the direct comparability of findings and their use in equity-informed cost-effectiveness analysis. Future researches using representative samples that explore within and between country heterogeneity is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    批判性的观点和实践是社会工作的基础,然而,在公共社会服务中,只有很少的直接批判性实践的例子,对服务使用者和社会工作者的结果进行的实证评估甚至更少。本文根据贫困意识范式(PAP)的原则,对在以色列社会服务部门运作的五个计划的25项评估研究进行了快速证据审查。PAP是与生活在贫困中的人们进行直接社会工作实践的重要范例,由福利部在福利服务中实施,针对超过14,000个服务用户。我们审查的评估研究涵盖了4612名服务用户和1363名专业人员的总体定量样本,以及420名服务用户和424名专业人员的定性样本。研究结果表明:(1)该计划在与社会工作者的关系方面对服务使用者的影响,财务状况,家庭关系,和儿童的安全;(2)该计划对社会工作者的态度和做法的影响。最后,我们讨论了关于社会工作者在消除贫困中的作用的经验教训,在对贫困人口的干预方面取得成功,和文章的局限性。
    Critical perspectives and practices are fundamental to social work, yet there are only scarce examples of direct critical practice in public social services, and even fewer empirical evaluations of their outcomes for service users and social workers. This article presents a rapid evidence review of 25 evaluation studies of five programs that operate in the social services departments in Israel according to the principles of the Poverty-Aware Paradigm (PAP). The PAP is a critical paradigm for direct social work practice with people living in poverty that was implemented in the welfare services by the Ministry of Welfare, targeting over 14,000 service users. The evaluation studies we reviewed encompass an overall quantitative sample of 4612 service users and 1363 professionals, and a qualitative sample of 420 service users and 424 professionals. The findings present: (1) the program\'s outcomes for service users in terms of relationship with social workers, financial circumstances, family relations, and children\'s safety; and (2) the program\'s impact on social workers\' attitudes and practices. Finally, we discuss the lessons learned regarding social workers\' role in combatting poverty, the construction of success in interventions with people in poverty, and the article\'s limitations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人们活得更长,我们的生活变得更加数字化。因此,数字技术带来的好处,包括经济增长,提高劳动生产率,面对人口老龄化,确保卫生公平成为世界各国的重要议题。Japan,大韩民国(韩国)新加坡,泰国和泰国在亚太地区的信息和通信技术(ICT)发展方面排名前十,并且都面临着人口老龄化的挑战。精心设计的国家ICT政策和健康促进政策使各国在数字化和健康老龄化方面取得了重大进展和发展。本文旨在回答有关数字化和健康促进的问题:当它开始时,情况如何,有什么成就,以及它对未来的影响,通过审查日本的国家ICT政策和健康促进政策,考虑健康老龄化和数字化,韩国,新加坡,和泰国。本文旨在帮助读者全面了解每个国家构建健康老龄化数字社会的历程。此外,我们希望这篇论文能够成为各国交流经验和相互学习的来源,共同目标是建设一个健康的老龄化数字社会。
    People are living longer, and our life has become more digital. Hence, the benefits from digital technology, including economic growth, increasing labor productivity, and ensuring health equity in the face of an aging population emerged as a vital topic for countries around the world. Japan, the Republic of Korea (ROK), Singapore, and Thailand are in the top ten rankings in terms of information and communication technology (ICT) development within the Asia Pacific Region and all are facing challenges of population aging. Well-designed national ICT policy and health promotion policies enabled the countries to make significant progress and development in terms of digitalization and healthy aging. This paper aims to answer questions regarding digitization and health promotion: when it started, how it is going, what are the achievements, and what it holds for the future, considering healthy aging and digitalization by reviewing the national ICT policy and health promotion policies of Japan, Korea, Singapore, and Thailand. This paper is expected to help readers build a comprehensive understanding of each country\'s journey towards building a healthy aging digital society. Furthermore, we hope this paper can be a source for countries to exchange experiences and learn from each other with a joint goal of building a healthy aging digital society.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    社区组织和市政当局通过提供对残疾人参与社区至关重要的资源和服务来支持残疾人。他们的服务尤其受到与COVID-19大流行相关的限制的影响。该研究的目的是确定科学文献,以研究社区组织和市政当局如何调整由于COVID-19大流行而向残疾人提供的服务和资源。通过搜索Medline数据库进行了范围审查,Embase,CINAHL,PsycINFO和WebofScience核心合集于2021年1月发布。从7651项单独研究的初始搜索策略中纳入了15项研究。大多数研究是定量研究(73.3%;n=11),旨在描述COVID-19大流行期间实施的适应(66.7%;n=10)。大多数服务和资源涉及某种形式的预防保健(66.7%;n=10)。提供资源和服务的方式的适应在组织中差异很大(例如在线或在线和面对面的组合),但主要导致研究结果的改善(例如社交技能,生活质量)。障碍(例如,需要可靠的互联网连接,成员缺乏技术素养)和促进者(例如组织的灵活性和规划)已经确定了这些适应,但是关于他们的成本几乎没有信息。结果突出表明,自COVID-19大流行以来,在线服务的提供有所增加,并取得了有价值的成果。然而,需要进一步的研究来更好地识别障碍,远程服务的促进者和结果,以更好地应对未来的大规模灾难,如COVID-19大流行,并更好地支持无法获得亲自服务的个人。
    Community organisations and municipalities support people with disabilities by providing resources and services that are essential for their engagement in the community. Their services were particularly impacted by restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of the study is to identify scientific literature that examines how community organisations and municipalities adapted services and resources provided to people with disabilities as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. A scoping review was conducted by searching the databases Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science Core Collection in January 2021. Fifteen studies were included from the initial search strategy of 7651 individual studies. Most of the studies were quantitative studies (73.3%; n = 11) and aimed at describing the adaptations put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic (66.7%; n = 10). Most services and resources involved some form of preventive healthcare (66.7%; n = 10). The adaptation of modalities for delivering resources and services varied widely across organisations (e.g. online or a combination of online and in-person) but mostly led to an improvement of the studied outcome (e.g. social skills, quality of life). Barriers (e.g. need for a reliable internet connection, lack of technology literacy from the member) and facilitators (e.g. flexibility and planning from the organisations) for these adaptations have been identified, but there is little information surrounding their cost. The results highlight that the delivery of online services has increased since the inception of the COVID-19 pandemic with valuable outcomes. However, further research is needed to better identify the barriers, facilitators and outcomes of remote services to better face future large-scale disasters like the COVID-19 pandemic and to better support individuals who cannot reach in-person services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文报告了范围界定审查和与专家进行的修改后的e-Delphi调查的结果,该调查旨在综合现有知识并确定低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)和高收入国家(HICs)非正式就业对健康和健康公平影响的研究差距。
    范围审查包括2015年1月至2019年12月以英文在线发表的同行评审文章。此外,我们与专家一起进行了一项经过修改的e-Delphi调查,以验证我们从范围审查中得出的结果,并收到有关其他研究和政策差距的反馈.我们借鉴了就业条件知识网络开发的关于雇佣关系和健康不平等的微观和宏观框架,以综合和分析现有文献。
    共筛选了540篇文章,57人符合这项范围审查研究的资格标准,包括36个微观层面的研究,19关于宏观研究,13关于政策干预研究。大多数纳入的研究是在低收入国家进行的,而对非正式工作和健康的研究兴趣在全球范围内增加。现有文献中关于非正规就业对健康和健康公平影响的调查结果好坏参半:非正规就业并不一定导致比正规就业更差的健康结果。尽管所有非正式工人都有一些基本的弱点,包括有害的工作条件和有限的健康和社会保护,相关的健康影响因工人的亚组而异(例如,性别)和国家背景(例如,福利国家或劳动力市场的类型)。在修改后的e-Delphi调查中,与会者对非正式就业的定义缺乏共识表示高度认同,非正规就业概念的有用性,需要更多的比较政策研究,定性健康研究,以及性别与非正规就业交叉的研究。
    我们的研究结果清楚地表明,需要进行更多的研究,以进一步了解非正规就业影响不同国家和不同非正式工人群体健康的各种机制。
    This article reports on the results from a scoping review and a modified e-Delphi survey with experts which aimed to synthesize existing knowledge and identify research gaps on the health and health equity implications of informal employment in both low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HICs).
    The scoping review included peer-reviewed articles published online between January 2015 and December 2019 in English. Additionally, a modified e-Delphi survey with experts was conducted to validate our findings from the scoping review and receive feedback on additional research and policy gaps. We drew on micro- and macro-level frameworks on employment relations and health inequities developed by the Employment Conditions Knowledge Network to synthesize and analyze existing literature.
    A total of 540 articles were screened, and 57 met the eligibility criteria for this scoping review study, including 36 on micro-level research, 19 on macro-level research, and 13 on policy intervention research. Most of the included studies were conducted in LMICs while the research interest in informal work and health has increased globally. Findings from existing literature on the health and health equity implications of informal employment are mixed: informal employment does not necessarily lead to poorer health outcomes than formal employment. Although all informal workers share some fundamental vulnerabilities, including harmful working conditions and limited access to health and social protections, the related health implications vary according to the sub-groups of workers (e.g., gender) and the country context (e.g., types of welfare state or labour market). In the modified e-Delphi survey, participants showed a high level of agreement on a lack of consensus on the definition of informal employment, the usefulness of the concept of informal employment, the need for more comparative policy research, qualitative health research, and research on the intersection between gender and informal employment.
    Our results clearly identify the need for more research to further understand the various mechanisms through which informal employment affects health in different countries and for different groups of informal workers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    较低的收入与较差的心理健康和幸福感有关,但收入在多大程度上具有因果效应是有争议的。我们旨在综合来自研究的证据,这些研究测量了个人和家庭收入变化对工作年龄成年人(16-64岁)的心理健康和福祉结果的影响。
    对于本系统综述和荟萃分析,我们搜索了MEDLINE,Embase,WebofScience,PsycINFO,ASSIA,EconLit,和RePEc于2020年2月5日进行随机对照试验(RCT)和定量非随机研究。我们的搜索没有日期限制。我们纳入了英语研究,以衡量个人或家庭收入变化对任何心理健康或福祉结果的影响。我们使用了Cochrane偏倚风险(RoB)工具。我们进行了三级随机效应荟萃分析,并使用荟萃回归和分层分析探索异质性。没有荟萃分析的合成是基于效应方向。关键的RoB研究从主要分析中排除。使用建议评级评估来评估证据的确定性,开发和评估(等级)。这项研究在PROSPERO注册,CRD42020168379。
    在筛选的16521篇引文中,136项进行了叙述合成(12·5%RCT)和86项荟萃分析。RoB很高:30·1%被评为危急,47·1%被评为严重或高。使个人摆脱贫困的二元收入增加与心理健康措施的0·13SD改善有关(95%CI0·07至0·20;n=42128;18项研究),远远大于其他收入增长(0·01标准差提高,0·002至0·019;n=216509,14项研究)。为了幸福,摆脱贫困的增加与0·38SD改善(0·09至0·66;n=101350,8项研究)相关,而其他收入增加则为0·16(0·07至0·25;n=62619,11项研究)。任何来源的收入减少都与心理健康指标的0·21SD恶化有关(-0·30至-0·13;n=227804,11项研究)。在低收入和中等收入环境以及较高的RoB研究中,效应大小更大。异质性高(I2=79-87%)。等级确定性很低或很低。
    收入变化可能会影响心理健康,特别是在他们使个人摆脱贫困的地方,虽然效果大小适中,确定性低。对福祉结果的影响更大,并可能造成收入损失。为了最好地支持人口心理健康,福利政策需要惠及社会经济上处于最不利地位的人群。
    惠康信托基金,医学研究理事会,首席科学家办公室,和欧洲研究理事会。
    Lower incomes are associated with poorer mental health and wellbeing, but the extent to which income has a causal effect is debated. We aimed to synthesise evidence from studies measuring the impact of changes in individual and household income on mental health and wellbeing outcomes in working-age adults (aged 16-64 years).
    For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, ASSIA, EconLit, and RePEc on Feb 5, 2020, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quantitative non-randomised studies. We had no date limits for our search. We included English-language studies measuring effects of individual or household income change on any mental health or wellbeing outcome. We used Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tools. We conducted three-level random-effects meta-analyses, and explored heterogeneity using meta-regression and stratified analyses. Synthesis without meta-analysis was based on effect direction. Critical RoB studies were excluded from primary analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020168379.
    Of 16 521 citations screened, 136 were narratively synthesised (12·5% RCTs) and 86 meta-analysed. RoB was high: 30·1% were rated critical and 47·1% serious or high. A binary income increase lifting individuals out of poverty was associated with 0·13 SD improvement in mental health measures (95% CI 0·07 to 0·20; n=42 128; 18 studies), considerably larger than other income increases (0·01 SD improvement, 0·002 to 0·019; n=216 509, 14 studies). For wellbeing, increases out of poverty were associated with 0·38 SD improvement (0·09 to 0·66; n=101 350, 8 studies) versus 0·16 for other income increases (0·07 to 0·25; n=62 619, 11 studies). Income decreases from any source were associated with 0·21 SD worsening of mental health measures (-0·30 to -0·13; n=227 804, 11 studies). Effect sizes were larger in low-income and middle-income settings and in higher RoB studies. Heterogeneity was high (I2=79-87%). GRADE certainty was low or very low.
    Income changes probably impact mental health, particularly where they move individuals out of poverty, although effect sizes are modest and certainty low. Effects are larger for wellbeing outcomes, and potentially for income losses. To best support population mental health, welfare policies need to reach the most socioeconomically disadvantaged.
    Wellcome Trust, Medical Research Council, Chief Scientist Office, and European Research Council.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号