Shoulder

Shoulder
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患者是临床研究的关键利益相关者,他们的观点与研究人员在计划和进行临床试验时相关。试验过程的许多方面都会影响参与者的体验。他们在试验中的经历会影响保留率。不良的治疗依从性可能会使治疗效果估计产生偏差。提高招募和依从性的一种方法是设计符合患者需求和偏好的试验。本研究报告了奥塔哥MASTER可行性试验的过程评估。
    目的:我们的目的是通过个体访谈调查患者对试验干预的看法。
    方法:招募了25名参与者进行可行性试验,并分为两组:定制或标准化运动。16名参与者同意参加个人半结构化访谈。访谈被逐字转录,所有访谈都使用迭代方法进行了主题分析。
    结果:我们的主要研究结果表明参与者:(1)参与研究以获得医疗保健服务并为研究做出贡献;(2)接受有价值的干预措施;(3)报告了参与试验的某些障碍和促进者;(4)在设计完整试验时强调了需要改进的地方。
    结论:参与者自愿获得医疗保健并为研究做出贡献。参与者重视个性化护理,认为他们参与试验改善了他们的自我管理和自我效能行为,重视与临床医生在一起的时间,以及所接受的移情环境和教育。由于障碍可能会影响未来试验结果的可靠性和有效性,因此将来需要仔细考虑促进者和障碍。
    BACKGROUND: Patients are key stakeholders of clinical research, and their perspectives are relevant for researchers when planning and conducting clinical trials. Numerous aspects of trial process can influence participants\' experiences. Their experiences within a trial can impact retention rates. Poor treatment adherence may bias treatment effect estimates. One way to improve recruitment and adherence is to design trials that are aligned with patients\' needs and preferences. This study reports a process evaluation of the Otago MASTER feasibility trial.
    OBJECTIVE: Our aims were to investigate the patients\' perceptions of the trial interventions through individual interviews.
    METHODS: Twenty-five participants were recruited for the feasibility trial and were allocated to two groups: tailored or standardised exercise. Sixteen participants agreed to take part in individual semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and all interviews were analysed thematically using an iterative approach.
    RESULTS: Our key findings suggest participants: (1) took part in the study to access healthcare services and contribute to research; (2) valued interventions received; (3) reported certain barriers and facilitators to participate in the trial; and (4) highlighted areas for improvement when designing the full trial.
    CONCLUSIONS: Participants volunteered to access healthcare and to contribute to research. Participants valued the personalised care, perceived that their engagement within the trial improved their self-management and self-efficacy behaviour, valued the time spent with clinicians, and the empathetic environment and education received. Facilitators and barriers will require careful consideration in the future as the barriers may impact reliability and validity of future trial results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肾盂骨丢失(GBL)在肩关节不稳患者中很常见,在手术决策中起主要作用。虽然存在大量的GBL估计方法,所有这些都带来了具体的挑战,最近的研究已经开发了简单的线性公式估计GBL基于关节盂高度。
    为了评估关节盂高度和宽度之间的相关性,并根据年龄和性别开发特定的公式来计算黎巴嫩人口中的本地关节盂宽度。
    横断面研究;证据水平,3.
    从我们的数据库中提取了202个正常肩膀的计算机断层扫描。在3个维度中重建了腺体,并测量了它们的宽度和高度。比较男性和女性组的关节盂宽度和高度。还对宽度进行了相关分析,高度,年龄,和体重指数。使用回归分析开发了估计关节盂宽度的公式,其中包括显着影响模型的所有变量。然后将结果与使用先前发布的公式计算的值进行比较,以确定使用线性公式估计GBL时的外部有效性。
    发现男性和女性之间存在显着差异。回归分析发现,关节盂的高度和宽度对模型的影响较大,并且该年龄显示出微弱但显着的相关性;因此,开发了以下两个特定性别的公式:宽度(mm)=6.10.51×身高0.03×年龄,宽度(mm)=4.55+0.51×高度+0.03×龄期,在男人和女人中,分别。本研究中开发的公式得出的值和真实宽度与以前报告中计算的值有很大不同。
    在黎巴嫩人群中发现关节盂高度和宽度之间存在很强的相关性,并证明可以根据关节盂高度和患者的年龄和性别使用以下简化公式准确计算关节盂宽度:宽度(mm)=60.5×身高0.03×年龄,宽度(mm)=4.5+0.5×高度+0.03×年龄,在男人和女人中,分别。
    UNASSIGNED: Glenoid bone loss (GBL) is common in patients with shoulder instability and plays a major role in surgical decision-making. While a plethora of GBL estimation methods exist, all of which present specific challenges, recent studies have developed simple linear formulas estimating GBL based on glenoid height.
    UNASSIGNED: To assess the correlation between glenoid height and width, and to develop specific formulas based on age and sex to calculate the native glenoid width in the Lebanese population.
    UNASSIGNED: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
    UNASSIGNED: Computed tomography scans for 202 normal shoulders were extracted from our database. The glenoids were reconstructed in 3 dimensions and their width and height were measured. Glenoid width and height were compared between male and female groups. Correlation analysis was also performed on the width, height, age, and body mass index. Formulas estimating glenoid width were developed using regression analysis including all variables significantly influencing the model. Results were then compared with the values calculated using previously published formulas to determine the external validity when using linear formulas to estimate GBL.
    UNASSIGNED: Significant differences were found between men and women. Regression analysis found that glenoid height and width strongly influenced the model, and that age showed a weak but significant correlation; therefore, the following 2 sex-specific formulas were developed: width (mm) = 6.1 + 0.51 ×height+ 0.03 ×age, and width (mm) = 4.55 + 0.51 ×height+ 0.03 ×age, in men and women, respectively. The values yielded from the formulas developed in this study and the true width significantly differed from those calculated from previous reports.
    UNASSIGNED: A strong correlation was found between glenoid height and width in a the Lebanese population and demonstrated that glenoid width can be accurately calculated based on the glenoid height and patient\'s age and sex using the following simplified formulas: width (mm) = 6 + 0.5 ×height+ 0.03 ×age, and width (mm) = 4.5 + 0.5 ×height+ 0.03 ×age, in men and women, respectively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定疼痛自我效能(PSE)和对干预效果的期望随着时间的推移而提高或改善是否会导致更好的结果,以及用于管理肩袖相关肩痛(RCRSP)的干预是否会影响PSE和期望。
    方法:对一项随机对照试验的数据进行二次分析。
    方法:123例RCRSP患者(48[15]岁;51%为女性)。
    方法:参与者随机分为三个为期12周的干预措施之一(教育;教育和运动控制练习;教育和强化练习)。
    方法:在基线和12周时给予QuickDASH和西安大略肩袖指数(WORC)。在第0周和第6周评估疼痛自我效能。患者对干预效果的期望在随机分组前以及第一次和最后一次干预后进行评估。NparLD用于分析。时间效应表明随着时间的推移,患者的期望或PSE发生了显著变化,而缓解效应表明症状缓解的患者与未缓解的患者之间的预期或PSE存在显着差异。
    结果:患者的期望(-3至3)随着时间的推移而增加(0.33/3[0.19至0.77])。根据WORC(0.19/3[0.05至0.33]),对症状缓解的患者的总体期望较高。PSE随时间增加(5.5/60[3.6至7.4])。根据WORC(7.0[3.9至10.1])和QuickDASH(4.9[1.7至8.2]),出现症状缓解的患者总体PSE较高。
    结论:临床医生应考虑监测PSE和患者的期望,因为它们是结果的重要指标。论文的贡献。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine whether higher level or improvements over time in pain self-efficacy (PSE) and expectations of intervention effectiveness lead to better outcomes and whether the intervention used to manage rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP) impacts PSE and expectations over time.
    METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial.
    METHODS: 123 individuals (48 [15] years old; 51% female) with RCRSP.
    METHODS: Participants randomised into one of three 12-weeks interventions (education; education and motor control exercises; education and strengthening exercises).
    METHODS: QuickDASH and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) were administered at baseline and 12 weeks. Pain self-efficacy was assessed at 0 and 6 weeks. Patients\' expectations regarding intervention effectiveness were assessed before randomisation and after the first and the last intervention sessions. NparLD were used for the analyses. A time effect indicated a significant change in patients\' expectations or PSE over time, while a resolution effect indicated a significant difference in patients\' expectations or PSE between those whose symptoms resolved and those whose did not.
    RESULTS: Patients\' expectations (-3 to 3) increased over time (0.33/3 [0.19 to 0.77]). Overall expectations were higher for those who experienced symptom resolution based on the WORC (0.19/3 [0.05 to 0.33]). PSE increased over time (5.5/60 [3.6 to 7.4]). Overall PSE was higher for those who experienced symptom resolution based on the WORC (7.0 [3.9 to 10.1]) and the QuickDASH (4.9 [1.7 to 8.2]).
    CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should consider monitoring PSE and patients\' expectations as they are important indicators of outcome. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是通过改良的Delphi方法对肩关节假性麻痹和假性轻瘫的定义建立共识。
    方法:使用改良的Delphi技术对假性麻痹的诊断进行了一致的定义,和来自11个国家的26名肩部/运动外科医生,根据他们在该领域的专业知识水平选择,参与了这些共识声明。共识被定义为达成80-89%的协议,而强烈的共识被定义为90-99%的共识,与拟议的声明达成了100%的一致意见。
    结果:关于假麻痹诊断的三个陈述达成了强烈(>89%)共识:被动运动范围(ROM)应不受影响,如果注射利多卡因能显著改善活动范围,则不应考虑被动外展范围,并应排除诊断.此外,达成共识(>79%),不应考虑外部旋转的活动范围进行诊断,必须排除作为活动受限原因的疼痛,并且限制主动屈曲和外部旋转之间的区别应该通过ROM而不是撕裂特性来进行。关于规模的声明无法达成共识,肌腱数量或袖口撕裂的慢性。对于允许的有效屈曲范围或假性麻痹和假性轻瘫之间的差异也没有达成共识。
    结论:采用改良的Delphi方法对肩关节假性麻痹和假性轻瘫的定义达成共识。不幸的是,几乎一半的声明没有达成共识,在RCT设置中,对于假麻痹诊断的统一定义,未能在所有领域达成一致.此外,对于如何或是否应将假性麻痹与假性轻瘫区分开来,目前尚未达成一致意见.基于对这些术语缺乏共识,研究应明确报告这些术语在使用时是如何定义的。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to establish consensus statements via a modified Delphi process on the definition of shoulder pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis.
    METHODS: A consensus process on the definition of a diagnosis of pseudoparalysis utilizing a modified Delphi technique was conducted, and 26 shoulder/sports surgeons from 11 countries, selected based on their level of expertise in the field, participated in these consensus statements. Consensus was defined as achieving 80-89% agreement, whereas strong consensus was defined as 90-99% agreement, and unanimous consensus was indicated by 100% agreement with a proposed statement.
    RESULTS: Three statements regarding the diagnosis of pseudoparalysis reached strong (>89%) consensus: passive range of motion (ROM) should be unaffected, the passive range of abduction should not be considered and diagnosis should be excluded if lidocaine injection produces a substantial improvement in range of motion. Additionally, consensus (>79%) was reached that the active range of external rotation should not be considered for diagnosis, pain as a cause of restricted motion must be excluded, and that distinctions between restricted active flexion and external rotation should be made by ROM rather than tear characteristics. No consensus could be reached on statements regarding the size, number of tendons or chronicity of cuff tears. Nor was there agreement on the active range of flexion permitted or on the difference between pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis.
    CONCLUSIONS: A modified Delphi process was utilized to establish consensus on the definition of shoulder pseudoparalysis and pseudoparesis. Unfortunately, almost half of the statements did not reach consensus, and agreement could not be reached across all domains for a unifying definition for the diagnosis of pseudoparalysis in the setting of RCTs. Furthermore, it was not agreed how or whether pseudoparalysis should be differentiated from pseudoparesis. Based on the lack of a consensus for these terms, studies should report explicitly how these terms are defined when they are used.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:使用顺行髓内钉固定治疗肱骨干骨折可产生令人满意的骨愈合率;然而,它可能会对术后肩关节功能产生不利影响。迄今为止,影响髓内钉固定术后中远期肩关节功能结局的因素尚未明确.在这项研究中,我们旨在确定肱骨干骨折顺行髓内钉接骨术后5年中期功能不良的危险因素.
    方法:我们回顾性分析了33例采用顺行髓内钉治疗急性外伤性肱骨干骨折的患者,术后随访至少5年。我们使用最终随访时年龄和性别调整的Constant评分55作为截止值将患者分为临床失败和无临床失败组。我们比较了术前,围手术期,和术后因素比较。
    结果:33例患者中有5例术后平均随访7.5年,肩关节功能转归较差(校正常数评分<55)。在单变量分析中,骨愈合时(P=0.004)和年龄较大(P=0.009)的指甲近端突出与临床失败显着相关。多因素分析显示,钉近端突出(P=0.031)是不良预后的危险因素。
    结论:这项研究的结果提供了关于使用顺行指甲进行骨合成后影响中期结局的预测因素的新信息。我们的结果表明,指甲的近端突出与中期功能不良的肩关节预后显着相关。因此,尤其是老年人,必须将髓内钉的近端置于关节软骨的下方。
    BACKGROUND: Osteosynthesis using antegrade intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures yields satisfactory bone union rates; however, it may adversely affect postoperative shoulder function. To date, factors affecting mid- or long-term shoulder functional outcomes following intramedullary nail fixation have not been clarified. In this study, we aimed to identify the risk factors for poor mid-term functional outcomes over 5 years postoperatively following antegrade intramedullary nail osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fractures.
    METHODS: We retrospectively identified 33 patients who underwent surgery using an antegrade intramedullary nail for acute traumatic humeral shaft fractures and were followed up for at least 5 years postoperatively. We divided the patients into clinical failure and no clinical failure groups using an age- and sex-adjusted Constant score of 55 at the final follow-up as the cutoff value. We compared preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative factors between the two groups.
    RESULTS: Five of the 33 patients had poor shoulder functional outcomes (adjusted Constant score < 55) at a mean follow-up of 7.5 years postoperatively. Proximal protrusion of the nail at the time of bone union (P = 0.004) and older age (P = 0.009) were significantly associated with clinical failure in the univariate analyses. Multivariate analysis showed that proximal protrusion of the nail (P = 0.031) was a risk factor for poor outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study provide new information on predictive factors affecting mid-term outcomes following osteosynthesis using antegrade nails. Our results demonstrated that proximal protrusion of the nail was significantly associated with poor mid-term functional shoulder outcomes. Therefore, particularly in older adults, it is essential to place the proximal end of the intramedullary nail below the level of the articular cartilage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Erectorspinae平面阻滞(ESPB)是一种新颖的筋膜平面阻滞技术,可为胸椎提供有效的围手术期镇痛,腹部和腰椎手术。然而,颈椎ESPB对肩关节镜术后镇痛的影响尚不清楚。目的探讨超声引导下颈椎ESPB在肩关节镜手术中的镇痛效果及安全性。
    方法:将70例接受肩关节镜手术的患者随机分为两组:ESPB组(n=35)或对照组(n=35)。ESPB组患者在全麻诱导前30分钟接受C7水平的超声引导ESPB和30mL的0.25%罗哌卡因,而对照组患者未接受阻滞.主要结果指标是手术后4、12和24h的静态视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分。次要结果包括麻醉前的心率(HR)和平均动脉压(MAP)(t1),麻醉后5min(t2),皮肤切开后10分钟(t3),拔管后10min(t4);术中瑞芬太尼用量;Bruggrmann舒适量表(BCS)评分,恢复质量-15(QoR-15)量表评分和术后24h需要抢救镇痛的患者人数;和不良事件。
    结果:ESPB组术后4、12和24h的静态VAS评分明显低于对照组(2.17±0.71vs.3.14±1.19,1.77±0.77vs.2.63±0.84,0.74±0.66vs.1.14±0.88,均P<0.05)。两组患者围手术期各时间点的HR、MAP差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。ESPB组术中瑞芬太尼用量明显少于对照组(P<0.05)。ESPB组术后24hBCS和QoR-15量表评分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。与对照组相比,ESPB组术后24h需要抢救镇痛的患者较少(P<0.05)。两组均无严重并发症发生。
    结论:超声引导下颈椎ESPB可在肩关节镜手术后提供有效的术后镇痛效果。术后恢复较好,并发症较少。
    背景:Chictr.org.cn标识符ChiCTR2300070731(注册日期:21/04/2023,预期注册)。
    BACKGROUND: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel fascial plane block technique that can provide effective perioperative analgesia for thoracic, abdominal and lumbar surgeries. However, the effect of cervical ESPB on postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic shoulder surgery is unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the analgesic effect and safety of ultrasound-guided cervical ESPB in arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
    METHODS: Seventy patients undergoing arthroscopy shoulder surgery were randomly assigned to one of two groups: ESPB group (n = 35) or control group (n = 35). Patients in the ESPB group received an ultrasound-guided ESPB at the C7 level with 30 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine 30 min before induction of general anesthesia, whereas patients in the control group received no block. The primary outcome measures were the static visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at 4, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) before anesthesia (t1), 5 min after anesthesia (t2), 10 min after skin incision (t3), and 10 min after extubation (t4); intraoperative remifentanil consumption; the Bruggrmann comfort scale (BCS) score, quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale score and the number of patients who required rescue analgesia 24 h after surgery; and adverse events.
    RESULTS: The static VAS scores at 4, 12 and 24 h after surgery were significantly lower in the ESPB group than those in the control group (2.17 ± 0.71 vs. 3.14 ± 1.19, 1.77 ± 0.77 vs. 2.63 ± 0.84, 0.74 ± 0.66 vs. 1.14 ± 0.88, all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in HR or MAP at any time point during the perioperative period between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The intraoperative consumption of remifentanil was significantly less in the ESPB group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The scores of BCS and QoR-15 scale were higher in the ESPB group 24 h after surgery than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Compared to the control group, fewer patients in the ESPB group required rescue analgesia 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05). No serious complications occurred in either group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided cervical ESPB can provide effective postoperative analgesia following arthroscopic shoulder surgery, resulting in a better postoperative recovery with fewer complications.
    BACKGROUND: Chictr.org.cn identifier ChiCTR2300070731 (Date of registry: 21/04/2023, prospectively registered).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景技术中风患者的肩关节半脱位损害恢复和生活质量。运动学胶带具有弹性和防水性,通常用于预防肌肉骨骼损伤,并且越来越多地用于需要神经或身体康复的患者的康复。这项研究包括35例中风后肩关节半脱位的患者,旨在比较有和没有肩关节运动学录音的标准物理治疗的结果。材料和方法本随机对照研究涉及35名参与者。患者被随机分为肩关节运动学录音组(n=18)或假录音组(n=17)。所有患者均接受常规康复锻炼计划,每周5天,共6周。一半的病人接受了肩关节运动学测试,另一半接受了假录音。记录所有参与者肩关节半脱位距离(SSD)的评估前和评估后得分,活动范围(AROM),视觉模拟量表(VAS),肩痛和残疾指数(SPADI),并修改了Barthel指数(MBI)。结果干预后,SSD,阿罗姆,VAS,SPADI,肩关节运动负荷组和假负荷组MBI明显改善(P<0.05)。此外,肩部运动学录音组显示出更有效的SSD变化,阿罗姆,VAS,SPADI,MBI高于假录音组(P<0.05)。结论这些结果表明,肩关节运动学胶带可有效改善SSD,阿罗姆,VAS,SPADI,和MBI在偏瘫肩关节半脱位患者中的应用。
    BACKGROUND Shoulder subluxation in patients with stroke impairs recovery and quality of life. Kinesiology tape is elastic and water-resistant, is commonly used to prevent musculoskeletal injury, and is increasing in use for rehabilitation of patients requiring neurological or physical rehabilitation. This study included 35 patients with shoulder subluxation following stroke and aimed to compare outcomes from standard physical therapy with and without shoulder kinesiology taping. MATERIAL AND METHODS This randomized controlled study involved 35 participants. The patients were randomized into a shoulder kinesiology taping group (n=18) or sham taping group (n=17). All patients underwent a conventional rehabilitation exercise program 5 days a week for 6 weeks. Half of the patients underwent shoulder kinesiology taping, and the other half underwent sham taping. Pre- and post-assessment scores were recorded for all participants for shoulder subluxation distance (SSD), active range of motion (AROM), visual analog scale (VAS), shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), and modified Barthel index (MBI). RESULTS After the intervention, SSD, AROM, VAS, SPADI, and MBI improved significantly in the shoulder kinesiology taping and sham taping groups (P<0.05). Also, the shoulder kinesiology taping group showed more effective changes in SSD, AROM, VAS, SPADI, and MBI than the sham taping group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that the shoulder kinesiology taping is effective in improving SSD, AROM, VAS, SPADI, and MBI in patients with hemiplegic shoulder subluxation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:超重对肩关节粘连性囊炎(AC)发生率的影响尚未得到明确证明。这项研究旨在使用韩国大规模的全国性人群队列研究超重与年龄之间的关联。
    方法:我们分析了3,517,066名20岁以上的患者的临床数据,这些患者在2009年接受了国家健康保险服务健康检查。在中位随访时间为8.3年期间,使用索赔数据确定了在一年内至少三次去医院或私人诊所治疗肩痛并被分配AC诊断代码(ICD-10代码M75.00)的患者。使用Cox比例风险模型计算AC的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间。
    结果:<40岁组的AC的校正HR在超重状态下开始增加,并且与肥胖的严重程度相关(体重指数(BMI)<18.5;0.654(0.613-0.697),<23;1,<25;1.272(1.231-1.315),<30;1.322(1.281-1.364),≥30;1.332(1.253-1.416))。但在40-64岁组和≥65岁组中,根据BMI水平,AC的HR没有显着增加的趋势。我们基于BMI23进行了亚组分析,以定义超重和合并症的存在,包括糖尿病和高脂血症。在超重和糖尿病和高脂血症合并症的情况下,AC的校正HR最高(糖尿病;1.528(1.508-1.549),高脂血症;1.212(1.199-1.226))。
    结论:在年轻年龄组(20-40岁),较高的BMI水平会增加AC的HR。超重与糖尿病或高脂血症显著增加AC的风险。
    BACKGROUND: The impact of overweight on the incidence of shoulder adhesive capsulitis (AC) has not been clearly proven. This study aimed to investigate the association between overweight and AC by age using a large-scale nationwide population-based cohort in Korea.
    METHODS: We analyzed clinical data from 3,517,066 individuals older than 20 years who had undergone a National Health Insurance Service health checkup in 2009. Patients who visited a hospital or private clinic to treat shoulder pain at least three times in one year and were assigned a diagnostic code for AC (ICD-10 code M75.00) were identified using claims data during a median follow-up duration of 8.3 years. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals for AC were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model.
    RESULTS: The adjusted HR for AC in the < 40 year group started to increase in overweight status and was associated with the severity of obesity (body mass index (BMI) < 18.5; 0.654 (0.613-0.697), < 23; 1, < 25; 1.272 (1.231-1.315), < 30; 1.322 (1.281-1.364), ≥ 30; 1.332 (1.253-1.416)). But in the 40-64 year group and the ≥65 year group, there was no significant increasing trend of HR for AC according to BMI level. We conducted a subgroup analysis based on the BMI 23 for defining overweight and presence of comorbidities including diabetes and hyperlipidemia. The adjusted HR for AC was highest with overweight and comorbidities of diabetes and hyperlipidemia (diabetes; 1.528 (1.508-1.549), hyperlipidemia; 1.212 (1.199-1.226)).
    CONCLUSIONS: In the young age group (20-40 years), a higher BMI level increased the HR for AC. Overweight along with diabetes or hyperlipidemia significantly increased the risk of AC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:使用连续被动运动疗法(CPM)在手术治疗肩袖撕裂和肘关节松解术后的早期康复阶段取得了有希望的结果。然而,它的使用尚未在上肢的其他病理中得到证实。因此,基础研究的目的是评估肱骨近端骨折钢板接骨后CPM治疗的应用.
    方法:95例孤立性肱骨近端骨折患者纳入前瞻性研究,随机研究。患者被分配到接受(n=48,CPM)或不接受CPM治疗(n=47,CG)的治疗组。4名患者(每组2名)违反研究方案并被排除。手术后使用CPM治疗6周,每天2-3次。功能(活动范围)和患者报告的结果(PROM,恒定分数[CSS],QuickDASH,主观肩值[SSV],疼痛视觉模拟评分[VAS])在6周时进行评估,3和12个月。60例患者完成1年随访。
    结果:患者平均年龄为65.3岁(min:27,max:88,SD:±14.7)。72例患者为女性(79%)。损伤严重程度没有差异(2/3/4部分骨折:6/32/7与9/26/11,p=0.867)和性别(p=0.08)。然而,CPM组患者明显年轻(CPM:67[min:34,max:82],CG:74[min:27,max:88],p=0.032)。6周后,我们观察到向前屈曲的运动范围更好(CPM:90°[min:50°,max:180°]vs.CG:80°[min:20°,max:170°]p=0.035)和外展(CPM:80°[min:40°,max:180°]vs.CG:70°[min:20°,max:180°],CPM组p=0.048)。在第6周时,进一步的运动平面或评估的PROM没有差异。在3个月和12个月时,治疗组之间的结果相等,没有进一步的显着差异。
    结论:CPM治疗增加了肱骨近端骨折术后前6周的钢板固定后的活动范围。这种效果在3个月和12个月后不会持续。评估的PROM不受CPM治疗的影响。因此,这项前瞻性随机研究的结果表明,在肱骨近端钢板接骨术后的早期康复中,CPM可能是一项有益的资产。
    背景:研究方案已在美国国立卫生研究院的数据库中注册(http://www.
    结果:gov)NCT05952622下的注册表。
    BACKGROUND: The use of continuous passive motion therapy (CPM) has led to promising results in the early phase of rehabilitation after surgical treatment of rotator cuff tears and arthrolysis of the elbow. However, its use has not been proven in other pathologies of the upper extremity. Therefore, the aim of the underlying study was to evaluate the use of CPM therapy after plate osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures.
    METHODS: 95 patients with isolated proximal humerus fractures were enrolled in a prospective, randomized study. Patients were assigned to a treatment group with (n = 48, CPM) or without CPM therapy (n = 47, CG). Four patients (2 of each cohort) violated the study protocol and were excluded. CPM therapy was used for 6 weeks after surgery 2-3 times daily. Functional (range of motion) and patient reported outcomes (PROM, Constant Score [CSS], QuickDASH, subjective shoulder value [SSV], pain on visual analogue scale [VAS]) were evaluated at 6 weeks, 3 and 12months. 60 patients completed the 1-year follow-up.
    RESULTS: The average patient age was 65.3 years (min: 27, max: 88, SD: ± 14.7). Seventy-two patients were female (79%). There was no difference regarding injury severity (2/3/4 part-fracture: 6/32/7 vs. 9/26/11, p = 0.867) and sex (p = 0.08). However, patients in the CPM group were significantly younger (CPM: 67 [min: 34, max: 82], CG: 74 [min: 27, max: 88], p = 0.032). After 6 weeks we observed a better range of motion for forward flexion (CPM: 90° [min: 50°, max: 180°] vs. CG: 80° [min: 20°, max: 170°] p = 0.035) and abduction (CPM: 80° [min: 40°, max: 180°] vs. CG: 70° [min: 20°, max: 180°], p = 0.048) in the CPM group. There was no difference regarding the further planes of motion or the assessed PROMs at 6 weeks. At 3 and 12 months the results between the treatment groups equalized with no further significant differences.
    CONCLUSIONS: The treatment with CPM increases the range of motion after plate osteosynthesis of proximal humerus fractures in the first 6 weeks after surgery. This effect is not sustained after 3 and 12months. The evaluated PROMs are not being influenced by CPM therapy. Hence the results of this prospective randomized study suggest that CPM can be a beneficial asset in the early period of rehabilitation after proximal humerus plate osteosynthesis.
    BACKGROUND: The study protocol was registered in the US National Institutes of Health\'s database ( http://www.
    RESULTS: gov ) registry under NCT05952622.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在肩部手术中经常进行二头肌肌腱长头的肌腱固定术,和全缝合锚钉作为固定方法变得越来越流行。然而,关于全缝线锚钉的最终失效载荷和皮质肱骨插入点的最佳插入角度仍然存在不确定性。
    目的:本研究的目的是比较经常用于肱二头肌肌腱固定术的三种类型的全缝合锚钉的生物力学特性。此外,在猪肱骨模型中观察到两种不同插入角度的影响。
    方法:三种类型的全缝线锚钉的极限失效载荷和失效模式(1.6FiberTak®,1.9FiberTak®,2.6FiberTak®,在12只新鲜冷冻的猪肱骨中以90°和45°的插入角度评估了适用于胸肌下二头肌肌腱固定术的Arthrex®)。锚固件以随机方式在沿着二头肌沟的三个不同插入部位均匀交替插入,并且将缝合线带围绕杆打结以进行拔出测试。总的来说,在通用试验机(Zwick&Roell)中评估了36个锚。
    结果:与1.9FiberTak®(677.8N±57.7N;426.3N±167.0N)相比,2.6FiberTak®在90°插入角(944.0N±169.7N;537.0N±308.8N)下显示出更高的极限失效载荷,p值:0.0080)和1.6FiberTak®(733.0N±67.6N;450.0N±155.8N,p值:0.0018)。所有类型的锚在90°插入角下比在45°插入角下显示出明显更高的极限破坏载荷和更小的标准偏差。主要失效模式是锚杆拔出。只有2.6FiberTak®锚在以90°插入角度放置时显示缝合线断裂作为主要失效模式。
    结论:所有三种全缝合锚钉都是适用于胸肱二头肌下肌腱固定术的固定方法。关于我们的数据,我们建议90°作为最佳插入角度。
    结论:外科医生应了解锚钉尺寸和全缝线锚钉插入角度的影响,以优化最终失效载荷并实现牢固固定。
    BACKGROUND: Tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon is frequently performed in shoulder surgery, and all-suture anchors have become more popular as fixation methods. However, uncertainty still exists regarding the ultimate load to failure of all-suture anchors and the best insertion angle at a cortical humeral insertion point.
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of three types of all-suture anchors frequently used for biceps tenodesis. In addition, the influence of two different insertion angles was observed in a porcine humeri model.
    METHODS: The ultimate load to failure and failure mode of three types of all-suture anchors (1.6 FiberTak®, 1.9 FiberTak®, 2.6 FiberTak®, Arthrex®) applicable for subpectoral biceps tenodesis were evaluated at 90° and 45° insertion angles in 12 fresh-frozen porcine humeri. The anchors were inserted equally alternated in a randomized manner at three different insertion sites along the bicipital groove, and the suture tapes were knotted around a rod for pullout testing. In total, 36 anchors were evaluated in a universal testing machine (Zwick & Roell).
    RESULTS: The 2.6 FiberTak® shows higher ultimate loads to failure with a 90° insertion angle (944.0 N ± 169.7 N; 537.0 N ± 308.8 N) compared to the 1.9 FiberTak® (677.8 N ± 57.7 N; 426.3 N ± 167.0 N, p-value: 0.0080) and 1.6 FiberTak® (733.0 N ± 67.6 N; 450.0 N ± 155.8 N, p-value: 0.0018). All anchor types show significantly higher ultimate loads to failure and smaller standard deviations at the 90° insertion angle than at the 45° insertion angle. The major failure mode was anchor pullout. Only the 2.6 FiberTak® anchors showed suture breakage as the major failure mode when placed with a 90° insertion angle.
    CONCLUSIONS: All three all-suture anchors are suitable fixation methods for subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Regarding our data, we recommend 90° as the optimum insertion angle.
    CONCLUSIONS: The influence of anchor size and insertion angle of an all-suture anchor should be known by the surgeon for optimizing ultimate loads to failure and for achieving a secure fixation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号