暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of septic shock and together these conditions carry a high mortality risk. In septic patients who develop severe AKI, renal cortical perfusion is deficient despite normal macrovascular organ blood flow. This intra-renal perfusion abnormality may be amenable to pharmacological manipulation, which may offer mechanistic insight into the pathophysiology of septic AKI. The aim of the current study is to investigate the effects of vasopressin and angiotensin II on renal microcirculatory perfusion in a cohort of patients with septic shock.
METHODS: In this single centre, mechanistically focussed, randomised controlled study, 45 patients with septic shock will be randomly allocated to either of the study vasopressors (vasopressin or angiotensin II) or standard therapy (norepinephrine). Infusions will be titrated to maintain a mean arterial pressure (MAP) target set by the attending clinician. Renal microcirculatory assessment will be performed for the cortex and medulla using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and urinary oxygen tension (pO2), respectively. Renal macrovascular flow will be assessed via renal artery ultrasound. Measurement of systemic macrovascular flow will be performed through transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and microvascular flow via sublingual incident dark field (IDF) video microscopy. Measures will be taken at baseline, +1 and +24hrs following infusion of the study drug commencing. Blood and urine samples will also be collected at the measurement time points. Longitudinal data will be compared between groups and over time.
CONCLUSIONS: Vasopressors are integral to the management of patients with septic shock. This study aims to further understanding of the relationship between this therapy, renal perfusion and the development of AKI. In addition, using CEUS and urinary pO2, we hope to build a more complete picture of renal perfusion in septic shock by interrogation of the constituent parts of the kidney. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at academic meetings.
BACKGROUND: The REPERFUSE study was registered on Clinical Trials.gov (NCT06234592) on the 30th Jan 24.

Septic shock is a life-threatening disease worldwide often associated with thrombocytopenia. Platelets play a crucial role in bridging the gap between immunity, coagulation, and endothelial cell activation, potentially influencing the course of the disease. However, there are few studies specifically evaluating the impact of thrombocytopenia on the prognosis of pediatric patients. Therefore, the study investigates effects of early thrombocytopenia in the prognosis of children with septic shock. Pediatric patients with septic shock from 2015 to 2022 were included monocentrically. Thrombocytopenia was defined as a platelet count of <100 × 109/L during the first 24 hours of septic shock onset. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality. Propensity score matching was used to pair patients with different platelet counts on admission but comparable disease severity. A total of 419 pediatric patients were included in the analysis. Patients with thrombocytopenia had higher 28-day mortality (55.5% vs. 38.7%, p = .005) compared to patients with no thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia was associated with reduced 28-PICU free days (median value, 0 vs. 13 days, p = .003) and 28-ventilator-free (median value, 0 vs. 19 days, p = .001) days. Among thrombocytopenia patients, those with platelet count ≤50 × 109/L had a higher 28-day mortality rate (63.6% vs. 45%, p = .02). Multiple logistic regression showed that elevated lactate (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.11; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-1.17; P <0.001) and white blood cell (WBC) count (OR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95-0.99; p = .003) were independent risk factors for the development of thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia group had increased bleeding events, blood product transfusions, and development of organ failure. In Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, survival probabilities at 28 days were greater in patients without thrombocytopenia (p value from the log-rank test, p = .004). There were no significant differences in the type of pathogenic microorganisms and the site of infection between patients with and without thrombocytopenia. In conclusion, thrombocytopenia within 24 hours of shock onset is associated with an increased risk of 28-day mortality in pediatric patients with septic shock.
What is the context? Septic shock is a life-threatening disease worldwide, leading to higher mortality.Platelets play a crucial role in bridging the gap between immunity, coagulation, and endothelial cell activation.Although it is known that platelets are associated with prognosis, most studies have focused on adult populations. Limited data are available on the incidence of thrombocytopenia and its correlation with clinical outcomes , specifically, in pediatric patients with sepsis and septic shock. What is new? The present study suggests that thrombocytopenia within 24 hours of septic shock onset reflects a reliable tool for predicting the prognosis of septic shock in pediatric patients.Furthermore, elevated lactate and reduced white-blood-cell count were independent risk factors for the development of thrombocytopenia in pediatric patients with septic shock. What is the impact? This study suggests that thrombocytopenia within 24 hours of septic shock onset is associated with an increased risk of 28-day mortality and decreased ventilation-free, PICU-free days in pediatric patients with septic shock. In septic shock, thrombocytopenia is also associated with increased bleeding events, blood product transfusions, and organ dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Severe septic cardiomyopathy (SCM) is one of the main causes of refractory septic shock (RSS), with a high mortality. The application of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to support the impaired cardiac function in patients with septic shock remains controversial. Moreover, no prospective studies have been taken to address whether venoarterial ECMO treatment could improve the outcome of patients with sepsis-induced cardiogenic shock. The objective of this study is to assess whether venoarterial ECMO treatment can improve the 30-day survival rate of patients with sepsis-induced refractory cardiogenic shock.
METHODS: ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the therapy for REfractory Septic shock with Cardiac function Under Estimated is a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised, cohort study on the application of ECMO in SCM. At least 64 patients with SCM and RSS will be enrolled in an estimated ratio of 1:1.5. Participants taking venoarterial ECMO during the period of study are referred to as cohort 1, and patients receiving only conventional therapy without ECMO belong to cohort 2. The primary outcome is survival in a 30-day follow-up period. Other end points include survival to intensive care unit (ICU) discharge, hospital survival, 6-month survival, quality of life for long-term survival (EQ-5D score), successful rate of ECMO weaning, long-term survivors\' cardiac function, the number of days alive without continuous renal replacement therapy, mechanical ventilation and vasopressor, ICU and hospital length of stay, the rate of complications potentially related to ECMO treatment.
BACKGROUND: The trial has been approved by the Clinical Research and Application Institutional Review Board of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (2020-hs-51). Participants will be screened and enrolled from ICU patients with septic shock by clinicians, with no public advertisement for recruitment. Results will be disseminated in research journals and through conference presentations.
BACKGROUND: NCT05184296.

OBJECTIVE: Frailty is a vulnerable state to stressors due to the loss of physiological reserve as a result of multisystem dysfunction. The physiological and laboratory-based frailty index (FI-Lab), depending on laboratory values and vital signs, is a powerful tool to capture frailty status. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between FI-Lab and in-hospital mortality in patients with septic shock.
METHODS: Baseline data for patients with sepsis in the intensive care unit were retrieved from the Critical Care Medicine Database (MIMIC-IV, v2.2). The primary outcome was mortality during hospitalization. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to analyze the basic conditions during hospitalization between groups.The FI-Lab was analysed for its relationship with in-hospital mortality using logistic regression according to continuous and categorical variables, respectively, and described using the restricted cubic spline (RCS). Survival was compared between groups using Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves. Subgroup analyses were used to improve the stability of the results.
RESULTS: A total of 9219 patients were included. A cohort score of 1803 matched patients was generated after PSM. The analyses showed that non-surviving patients with septic shock in the ICU had a high FI-Lab index (P<0.001). FI-Lab, whether used as a continuous or categorical variable, increased with increasing FI-Lab and increased in-hospital mortality (P<0.001).Subgroup analyses showed similar results. RCS depicts this non-linear relationship. KM analysis shows the cumulative survival time during hospitalisation was significantly lower as FI-Lab increased (log-rank test, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Elevated FI-Lab is associated with increased in-hospital mortality in patients with septic shock.

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of a restrictive calcium replacement protocol in comparison with a liberal one in patients with septic shock.
METHODS: Multicenter retrospective before-after study that estimated the impact of implementing a restrictive calcium replacement protocol in patients with septic shock. Patients admitted to an intensive care unit between May 2019 and April 2021 were assigned to liberal calcium replacement, and those admitted between May 2021 and April 2022 were assigned to a restrictive protocol. The primary outcome measure was 28-day mortality. Patients were matched with propensity scores.
RESULTS: A total of 644 patients were included; liberal replacement was used in 453 patients and the restrictive replacement in 191. We paired 553 patients according to propensity scores, 386 in the liberal group and 167 in the restrictive group. Mortality did not differ significantly between the groups at 28 days (35.3% vs 32.3%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.72-1.29) or after resolution of septic shock (81.5% vs 83.8%; hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.73-1.09). Nor did scores on the Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment scale differ (2.1 vs 2.6; P = 0.20).
CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a restrictive calcium replacement protocol in patients with septic shock was not associated with a decrease in 28-day mortality in comparison with use of a liberal protocol. However, we were able to reduce calcium replacement without adverse effects.
OBJECTIVE: Investigar el efecto de un protocolo de reposición restrictiva de calcio frente a una estrategia liberal en pacientes con shock séptico.
METHODS: Estudio multicéntrico, antes-después y retrospectivo que evaluó el efecto de la implementación de un protocolo de reposición restrictiva de calcio en pacientes con shock séptico. Los pacientes que ingresaron en unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI) entre mayo de 2019 y abril de 2021 se asignaron al grupo con administración liberal, y los que se presentaron entre mayo de 2021 y abril de 2022 –tras la implementación del protocolo– al grupo con administración restrictiva. La variable de resultado principal fue la mortalidad a 28 días. Se realizó un emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión.
RESULTS: Se incluyeron 644 pacientes, 453 en el grupo liberal y 191 en el grupo restrictivo. De los que 553 se emparejaron (386 en el grupo liberal, y 167 en el grupo restrictivo). No hubo diferencias entre los dos grupos en la mortalidad a los 28 días (35,3% vs 32,3%; HR: 0,97; IC 95%: 0,72-1,29), en la finalización del shock (81,5% vs a 83,8%; HR: 0,89; IC 95%: 0,73-1,09) ni en la puntuación de la escala SOFA (2,1 vs 2,6; p = 0,20).
CONCLUSIONS: La implementación de un protocolo de administración restrictiva de calcio, en pacientes con shock séptico, no se asoció a una disminución de la mortalidad a los 28 días en comparación con una administración liberal. No obstante, la reposición de calcio podría reducirse sin efectos adversos.

Non-resuscitation fluids constitute the majority of fluid administered for septic shock patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). This multicentre, randomized, feasibility trial was conducted to test the hypothesis that a restrictive protocol targeting non-resuscitation fluids reduces the overall volume administered compared with usual care.
Adults with septic shock in six Swedish ICUs were randomized within 12 h of ICU admission to receive either protocolized reduction of non-resuscitation fluids or usual care. The primary outcome was the total volume of fluid administered within three days of inclusion.
Median (IQR) total volume of fluid in the first three days, was 6008 ml (interquartile range [IQR] 3960-8123) in the restrictive fluid group (n = 44), and 9765 ml (IQR 6804-12,401) in the control group (n = 48); corresponding to a Hodges-Lehmann median difference of 3560 ml [95% confidence interval 1614-5302]; p < 0.001). Outcome data on all-cause mortality, days alive and free of mechanical ventilation and acute kidney injury or ischemic events in the ICU within 90 days of inclusion were recorded in 98/98 (100%), 95/98 (98%) and 95/98 (98%) of participants respectively. Cognition and health-related quality of life at six months were recorded in 39/52 (75%) and 41/52 (79%) of surviving participants, respectively. Ninety out of 134 patients (67%) of eligible patients were randomized, and 15/98 (15%) of the participants experienced at least one protocol violation.
Protocolized reduction of non-resuscitation fluids in patients with septic shock resulted in a large decrease in fluid administration compared with usual care. A trial using this design to test if reducing non-resuscitation fluids improves outcomes is feasible.
Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05249088, 18 February 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05249088.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is an infection-related systemic inflammatory response that often leads to elevated lactate levels. Monitoring lactate levels during severe sepsis is vital for influencing clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the association between plasma lactate levels and mortality in children with severe sepsis or septic shock.
METHODS: The current prospective study was conducted in the PICU of University Children\'s Hospital. The International Paediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference criteria for Definitions of Sepsis and Organ Failure in 2005 were used to diagnose patients with sepsis. We measured plasma lactate levels upon admission (Lac H0) and 6 h later (Lac H6). The static indices included the absolute lactate values (Lac H0 and Lac H6), while the dynamic indices included the delta-lactate level (ΔLac) and the 6-hour lactate clearance. The 6-hour lactate clearance was calculated using the following formula: [(Lac H0-Lac H6)100/Lac H0]. ΔLac was calculated as the difference between the Lac H0 and Lac H6 levels. Patient survival or death after a PICU stay was the primary outcome.
RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were included in this study: 25 had septic shock, and 21 had severe sepsis. The mortality rate was 54.3%. The Lac H0 did not significantly differ between survivors and nonsurvivors. In contrast, the survivors had significantly lower Lac H6 levels, higher ΔLac levels, and higher 6-hour lactate clearance rates than nonsurvivors. Lactate clearance rates below 10%, 20%, and 30% were significantly associated with mortality. The best cut-off values for the lactate clearance rate and Lac H6 for the prediction of mortality in the PICU were < 10% and ≥ 4 mmol/L, respectively. Patients with higher Lac H6 levels and lower lactate clearance rates had significantly higher PICU mortality based on Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the significance of lactate level trends over time for the prediction of mortality in the PICU in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Elevated lactate levels and decreased lactate clearance six hours after hospitalisation are associated with a higher mortality rate.

Intensive Care Unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) is a common complication that significantly impedes patient recovery. In the study, we investigated the correlation between early serum myoglobin levels in patients with septic shock due to pneumonia, and the incidence of ICU-AW, duration of mechanical ventilation, and prognosis. Patients were classified based on the development of ICU-AW within the first 10 days of ICU admission. We measured serum myoglobin levels upon ICU entry, and analyzed demographic data, APACHE II scores, use of mechanical ventilation, and clinical outcomes, including mortality and duration of mechanical ventilation. The results indicated significantly elevated serum myoglobin levels in the ICU-AW group, correlated with prolonged mechanical ventilation and increased mortality. ROC analysis revealed myoglobin as a promising biomarker for predicting ICU-AW, with an area under the curve of 0.843 (95% CI: 0.819~0.867), demonstrating a sensitivity of 76.00% and specificity of 82.30%. These findings underscored serum myoglobin as a predictive biomarker for early ICU-AW in septic shock patients, highlighting its potential to guide clinical decision-making.

OBJECTIVE: There was no evidence regarding the relationship between septic shock and tracheal injury scores. Investigate whether septic shock was independently associated with tracheal injury scores in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with invasive ventilation.
METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study.
METHODS: Our study was conducted in a Class III hospital in Hebei province, China.
METHODS: Patients over 18 years of age admitted to the ICU between 31 May 2020 and 3 May 2022 with a tracheal tube and expected to be on the tube for more than 24 hours.
METHODS: Tracheal injuries were evaluated by examining hyperaemia, ischaemia, ulcers and tracheal perforation by fiberoptic bronchoscope. Depending on the number of lesions, the lesions were further classified as moderate, severe or confluent.
RESULTS: Among the 97 selected participants, the average age was 56.6±16.5 years, with approximately 64.9% being men. The results of adjusted linear regression showed that septic shock was associated with tracheal injury scores (β: 2.99; 95% CI 0.70 to 5.29). Subgroup analysis revealed a stronger association with a duration of intubation ≥8 days (p=0.013).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with septic shock exhibit significantly higher tracheal injury scores compared with those without septic shock, suggesting that septic shock may serve as an independent risk factor for tracheal injury.
BACKGROUND: ChiCTR2000037842, registered 03 September 2020. Retrospectively registered, https://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=57011&htm=4.