Schools

学校
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:通用学校午餐具有改善学生营养摄入和食物获取的潜力,但要做到这一点,菜单必须营养充足。澳大利亚对学校午餐计划(SLP)的兴趣与日俱增,目前正在塔斯马尼亚试用。澳大利亚学校目前没有菜单开发的营养指南。
    方法:完成了对国际SLP的桌面审查,以及在澳大利亚营养参考值和澳大利亚膳食指南的背景下分析的发现,以告知塔斯马尼亚SLP指南的制定。
    结论:全球,SLP由部分大小和/或营养标准指导。可持续发展计划(其中许多解决粮食不安全问题)必须为儿童提供满足能源和营养需求的机会,同时尽量减少食物浪费。我们提出了基于能量的营养标准和菜单开发的定性建议。所以呢?:我们已经制定了指导方针来为塔斯马尼亚SLP菜单的开发提供信息。这些指南可能适用于其他试点类似计划的州和地区。
    OBJECTIVE: Universal school lunches hold the potential to improve student nutritional intake and access to food, but to do so menus must be nutritionally adequate. There is growing interest in school lunch programs (SLPs) in Australia, and one is currently being trialled in Tasmania. No nutrition guidelines currently exist for menu development in Australian schools.
    METHODS: A desktop review of international SLPs was completed, and findings analysed in the context of Australian Nutrient Reference Values and Australian Dietary Guidelines to inform the development of Tasmanian SLP guidelines.
    CONCLUSIONS: Globally, SLPs are guided by portion sizes and/or nutrient criteria. SLPs (many of which address food insecurity) must provide children the opportunity to meet energy and nutrient needs, while minimising food waste. We propose energy-based nutrient criteria and qualitative recommendations for menu development. SO WHAT?: We have developed guidelines to inform the development of Tasmanian SLP menus. These guidelines may be applicable to other states and territories piloting similar programs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    不到四分之一的美国儿童符合体育锻炼(PA)指南。了解PA发生的背景以及这些背景如何在满足PA指南中发挥作用是制定有效行为干预措施的重要一步。这项研究的目的是检查PA环境(体育参与,参加其他有组织的体育活动,积极上学,和户外游戏)以及在居住在德克萨斯州的代表性儿童样本中,儿童符合PA指南的天数。
    我们分析了德克萨斯州四年级儿童的全州样本的横截面数据,这些儿童完成了2019-2020德克萨斯州学校体育活动和营养(TexasSPAN)调查。德州SPAN调查旨在监测全州范围内学龄儿童超重/肥胖的患病率,并评估习惯性自我报告的肥胖相关行为。包括饮食和PA。加权泊松回归模型被用来检验PA环境(体育参与,参加其他有组织的体育活动,积极上学,和户外游戏)以及儿童符合PA指南的天数,适应性,种族/民族,超重/肥胖,城乡地位,和经济劣势。
    在一周内每天都有16.7%的四年级儿童达到体育锻炼指南(平均年龄=9.4±0.6岁;女性=48.7,西班牙裔占51.8%,符合PA指南的平均天数=3.6±2.3天)。十分之一(11.2%)的儿童在一周中的任何一天都不符合每日PA指南,72.1%的人在1到6天之间遇到了他们。参加体育运动(b=0.22,95CI:0.14,0.30),任何其他有组织的体育活动(b=0.13,95CI:0.017,0.19),在过去一周中,在户外玩耍1-3天(b=0.25,95CI:0.04,0.46)和4-7天(b=0.77,95CI:0.57,0.97)与儿童符合PA指南的天数显着正相关。
    参加体育运动,参加其他有组织的体育活动,在户外玩耍可能会对儿童符合PA指南的天数产生有益的影响。PA计划应考虑这些环境因素,并研究如何在儿童中有效,适当地促进有组织的活动和户外活动。
    UNASSIGNED: Less than one-quarter of US children meet physical activity (PA) guidelines. Understanding the context in which PA occurs and how these contexts may play a role in meeting PA guidelines is an essential step toward developing effective behavioral interventions. The purpose of this study was to examine associations between PA context (sports participation, participation in other organized physical activities, active travel to school, and outdoor play) and the number of days children met PA guidelines in a representative sample of children living in Texas.
    UNASSIGNED: We analyzed cross-sectional data from a statewide sample of fourth-grade children in Texas who completed the 2019-2020 Texas School Physical Activity and Nutrition (Texas SPAN) survey. The Texas SPAN survey was designed to monitor the statewide prevalence of overweight/obesity among school children and assess habitual self-reported obesity-related behaviors, including diet and PA. Weighted Poisson regression models were employed to examine the associations between PA contexts (sports participation, participation in other organized physical activities, active travel to school, and outdoor play) and the number of days children met PA guidelines, adjusting for sex, race/ethnicity, overweight/obesity, urban-rural status, and economic disadvantage.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 16.7% of fourth-grade children met physical activity guidelines every day during the week (mean age = 9.4 ± 0.6 years; female = 48.7, 51.8% Hispanic, mean days meeting PA guideline = 3.6 ± 2.3 days). One in ten (11.2%) children did not meet daily PA guidelines on any day of the week, and 72.1% met them between 1 and 6 days. Participating in sports (b = 0.22, 95%CI:0.14, 0.30), any other organized physical activities (b=0.13, 95%CI:0.017, 0.19), and playing outdoors 1-3 days (b = 0.25, 95%CI:0.04, 0.46) and 4-7 days in the past week (b = 0.77, 95%CI:0.57, 0.97) was significantly and positively associated with the number of days children met PA guidelines.
    UNASSIGNED: Participating in sports, participating in other organized physical activities, and playing outdoors may beneficially influence the number of days children meet PA guidelines. PA programs should consider these contextual factors and investigate how to promote organized activities and outdoor play effectively and appropriately among children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究旨在调查满足24小时运动行为的关联(24-HMB:身体活动[PA],在学龄青年的屏幕时间[ST],和睡眠)具有学术参与度指标的指南,心理功能,和认知功能在美国青年的国家代表性样本。
    方法:在这项横断面研究中,纳入1794名6至17岁的参与者进行多变量逻辑回归以确定上述关联,同时调整社会人口统计学和健康协变量。
    结果:符合24-HMB指南的参与者比例差异很大(PA+ST+睡眠=34[加权1.17%],PA+ST=23[加权1.72%],PA+睡眠=52[加权2.15%],PA=34[加权2.88%],ST=142[加权7.5%],ST+睡眠=209[加权11.86%],睡眠=725[加权35.5%],无=575[加权37.22%])。仅符合ST指南和综合(ST+睡眠和ST+睡眠+PA)指南的参与者表现出与学习兴趣/好奇心的持续有益关联。关心学校的表现,完成所需的作业,弹性,认知困难,自我调节(ps<0.05)。
    结论:以孤立或综合的方式参加24-HMB指南与提高学术参与度有关。心理功能,并减少认知困难。这些发现强调了在有内在化问题的青年中推广24-HMB准则的重要性。需要进一步的纵向研究来调查是否改变或修改符合特定的24-HMB指南(尤其是ST)对有内在化问题的年轻人有益。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate associations of meeting 24-h movement behavior (24-HMB: physical activity [PA], screen time [ST] in the school-aged youth, and sleep) guidelines with indicators of academic engagement, psychological functioning, and cognitive function in a national representative sample of U.S. youth.
    METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 1794 participants aged 6 to 17 years old were included for multivariable logistic regression to determine the above-mentioned associations, while adjusting for sociodemographic and health covariates.
    RESULTS: The proportion of participants who met 24-HMB guideline(s) varied greatly (PA+ ST+ sleep = 34 [weighted 1.17 %], PA + ST = 23 [weighted 1.72 %], PA + sleep = 52 [weighted 2.15 %], PA = 34 [weighted 2.88 %], ST = 142 [weighted 7.5 %], ST+ sleep = 209 [weighted 11.86 %], sleep = 725 [weighted 35.5 %], none = 575 [weighted 37.22 %]). Participants who met ST guideline alone and integrated (ST + Sleep and ST + sleep + PA) guidelines demonstrated the consistently beneficial associations with learning interest/curiosity, caring for school performance, completing required homework, resilience, cognitive difficulties, self-regulation (ps < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Meeting 24-HMB guidelines in an isolated or integrative manner was associated with improved academic engagement, psychological functioning, and reduced cognitive difficulties. These findings highlight the importance of the promotion of 24-HMB guidelines in youth with internalizing problems. Future longitudinal studies are needed to investigate whether changes or modifications of meeting specific 24-HMB guidelines (especially ST) is beneficial for youth with internalizing problems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    目的:学校膳食指南的实施通常不充分,有效实施学校营养干预措施的证据有限。本研究的目的是研究多战略实施干预措施的实施和有效性,以提高对挪威国家学校膳食指南的遵守程度。
    方法:该研究是一项以学校为基础的混合实施-有效性试验,采用前后非等效对照组设计,测试三种实施策略:内部便利化,培训和教育会议。
    方法:挪威东南部两个县的小学和课后服务。
    方法:学校校长,干预县33所学校的课后领导和班主任,以及比较县34所学校的校长和课后领导。
    结果:在随访时,干预组和对照组之间的变化分数有4个百分点的显着差异,调整基线依从性后(B=0.04,标准误差(s.e.)B=0.01,t=3.10,P=0·003)。干预效果与学校的社会经济状况无关。学校水平的忠诚度是实施维度,与干预组的变化分数相关性最强(rs=0.48),表明校长的支持对于获得最大的干预效果很重要。
    结论:基于学校的低强度干预措施,基于训练有素的教师作为内部促进者,可以提高挪威小学对国家学校用餐准则的遵守程度,无论当地的社会经济条件如何。实现保真度,在组织层面,可能是学校干预结果的有用预测因子。
    OBJECTIVE: Implementation of school meal guidelines is often inadequate, and evidence for effective implementation strategies for school-based nutrition interventions is limited. The aim of the present study was to examine the implementation and effectiveness of a multi-strategy implementation intervention to increase adherence to the Norwegian national school meal guideline.
    METHODS: The study was a school-based hybrid implementation effectiveness trial with a pre-post non-equivalent control group design, testing three implementation strategies: internal facilitation, training and an educational meeting.
    METHODS: Primary schools and after-school services in two counties in south-east Norway.
    METHODS: School principals, after-school leaders and class teachers from thirty-three schools in the intervention county and principals and after-school leaders from thirty-four schools in a comparison county.
    RESULTS: There was a significant difference of 4 percentage points in change scores between the intervention and the comparison groups at follow-up, after adjusting for baseline adherence (B = 0·04, seB = 0·01, t = 3·10, P = 0·003). The intervention effect was not associated with the school\'s socio-economic profile. School-level fidelity was the implementation dimension that was most strongly correlated (r s = 0·48) with the change scores in the intervention group, indicating that principals\' support is important for gaining the largest intervention effects.
    CONCLUSIONS: A school-based intervention with low intensity, based on trained teachers as internal facilitators, can increase adherence to the national school meal guideline among Norwegian primary schools, irrespective of local socio-economic conditions. Implementation fidelity, at an organisational level, may be a useful predictor for intervention outcomes in schools.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在COVID-19大流行期间,关于减少或预防SARS-CoV-2在学校中传播的措施的决策变得困难,因为有关其有效性和意外后果的证据基础迅速发展且不确定。为了支持决策者,一个跨学科的科学专家小组,公共卫生和学校当局以及直接受学校措施影响的人,召开了前所未有的努力,为德国学校制定基于证据和共识的公共卫生指南。这项研究旨在评估该指南是否以及如何影响决策过程。
    方法:这项研究包括三个组成部分:(1)我们根据每个联邦州的信息自由法案向教育部发送了询问,家庭,和健康。(2)我们对两个联邦州参与学校措施决策的个人进行了半结构化访谈,(3)我们与指引小组成员进行了半结构化访谈。描述性地分析了成分1中的回信内容;根据Kuckartz,使用演绎-归纳主题定性内容分析对成分2和3的数据进行了分析。
    结果:对《信息自由法》调查的回应表明,该指南被16个联邦州中的9个国家的教育部视为相关信息来源,并被用作检查五个联邦州现有学校措施指令的参考。所有参与者(20次访谈)都强调了该指南的价值,因为其基于证据和共识的开发过程,但也指出了其可用性和有用性的局限性。例如,缺乏背景特异性。参与者向决策者提供咨询(5次访谈)以及其他证据来源。总的来说,关于准则影响的看法喜忧参半。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,该指南在联邦国家的决策机构中相对众所周知,并且在其中一些方面与其他形式的证据一起被考虑。我们建议有必要进行进一步的研究,以评估公共卫生指南对(政治)决策的影响。可能需要调整指南制定过程,以考虑到公共卫生紧急情况期间及以后的决策现实。
    BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, decision-making on measures to reduce or prevent transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in schools was rendered difficult by a rapidly evolving and uncertain evidence base regarding their effectiveness and unintended consequences. To support decision-makers, an interdisciplinary panel of scientific experts, public health and school authorities as well as those directly affected by school measures, was convened in an unprecedented effort to develop an evidence- and consensus-based public health guideline for German schools. This study sought to assess whether and how this guideline impacted decision-making processes.
    METHODS: This study comprised three components: (1) we sent inquiries according to the Freedom of Information Acts of each Federal State to ministries of education, family, and health. (2) We conducted semi-structured interviews with individuals involved in decision-making regarding school measures in two Federal States, and (3) we undertook semi-structured interviews with members of the guideline panel. The content of response letters in component 1 was analysed descriptively; data for components 2 and 3 were analysed using deductive-inductive thematic qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz.
    RESULTS: Responses to the Freedom of Information Act inquiries showed that the guideline was recognised as a relevant source of information by ministries of education in nine out of 16 Federal States and used as a reference to check existing directives for school measures in five Federal States. All participants (20 interviews) emphasised the value of the guideline given its evidence- and consensus-based development process but also noted limitations in its usability and usefulness, e.g., lack of context-specificity. It was consulted by participants who advised policy-makers (5 interviews) alongside other sources of evidence. Overall, perceptions regarding the guideline\'s impact were mixed.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the guideline was relatively well-known in Federal States\' decision-making bodies and that it was considered alongside other forms of evidence in some of these. We suggest that further research to evaluate the impact of public health guidelines on (political) decision-making is warranted. Guideline development processes may need to be adapted to account for the realities of decision-making during public health emergencies and beyond.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:挪威学校卫生服务在2017年获得了国家最佳实践指南。促进健康的生活技能,并确定需要支持的青少年,该指南包括与所有8年级学生进行个人咨询以及加强与学校合作的强烈建议。为了帮助实施这些建议,与学校护士共同制定了混合实施战略(SchoolHealth),学生,和利益相关者。SchoolHealth由三个实现元素组成:数字对话和管理工具(审核和反馈),对话支持(外部咨询),和合作材料(有针对性的传播)。这项混合研究将测试这些元素对指南保真度和有效性的主要和综合影响。
    方法:GuideMe研究是一项阶乘整群随机对照试验,研究SchoolHealth在指南保真度和指南有效性目标方面的有效性。40所挪威中学将被随机分配到SchoolHealth元素的八种不同组合。参加者将包括这些学校的学校护士和学校人员,和八年级学生(n=1200)。主要结果是学校护士对指导方针的忠诚和学生应对生活的能力(即,健康素养,积极的健康行为和自我效能)。定量方法将用于测试效果和机制,虽然将使用混合和定性方法来探索机制,经验,和其他深入的现象。参与者将在学年开始和结束时完成数字问卷,在学年的咨询之后。这项研究将分两波进行,每次持续一个学年。多因素设计允许测试相互作用和主要效应,因为每个主要效应中所有因素的均匀分布。同时准备使用国家基础设施维持和扩大优化的学校健康要素。
    结论:该研究将单独和组合地研究实施要素的可能影响,和假设的实施机制。对用户体验的深入研究将有助于改善SchoolHealth中的元素。结果将产生有关实施策略及其断言效果的机制的因果知识。混合方法将提供有关元素如何以及何时起作用的见解。优化指南实施要素可以在关键的人生阶段为青少年提供支持。
    背景:ISRCTN24173836。注册日期2022年8月8日。
    BACKGROUND: Norwegian school health services received a national best-practice guideline in 2017. To promote healthy life skills and identify adolescents needing support, the guideline includes strong recommendations for individual consultations with all 8th graders and increased collaboration with schools. To help implement the recommendations, a blended implementation strategy (SchoolHealth) was co-created with school nurses, students, and stakeholders. SchoolHealth consists of three implementation elements: Digital dialog and administration tool (audit and feedback +), Dialog support (external consultation), and Collaboration materials (targeted dissemination). This hybrid study will test the main and combined effects of the elements on guideline fidelity and effectiveness.
    METHODS: The GuideMe study is a factorial cluster randomized controlled trial examining SchoolHealth\'s effectiveness on guideline fidelity and guideline effectiveness goals. Forty Norwegian secondary schools will be randomized to eight different combinations of the elements in SchoolHealth. Participants will include school nurses and school personnel from these schools, and 8th grade students (n = 1200). Primary outcomes are school nurses\' fidelity to the guidelines and student\'s ability to cope with their life (i.e., health literacy, positive health behaviors and self-efficacy). Quantitative methods will be used to test effects and mechanisms, while mixed- and qualitative methods will be used to explore mechanisms, experiences, and other phenomena in depth. Participants will complete digital questionnaires at the start and end of the schoolyear, and after the consultation during the schoolyear. The study will run in two waves, each lasting for one school year. The multifactorial design allows testing of interactions and main effects due to equal distribution of all factors within each main effect. Sustainment and scale-up of optimized SchoolHealth elements using national infrastructure are simultaneously prepared.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study will investigate possible effects of the implementation elements in isolation and in combination, and hypothesized implementation mechanisms. In-depth study of user experiences will inform improvements to elements in SchoolHealth. The results will yield causal knowledge about implementation strategies and the mechanisms through which they assert effects. Mixed-methods will provide insights into how and when the elements work. Optimizing guideline implementation elements can support adolescents in a crucial life phase.
    BACKGROUND: ISRCTN24173836. Registration date 8 August 2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们研究了在学校引入限制体育俱乐部活动的国家指南是否与青少年的运动和心肺健康有关。
    方法:我们进行了中断的时间序列分析,以量化地级汇总数据的变化在日本青少年中运动或体育活动和20米穿梭运动(心肺健康指标)之前(2013-2017)和之后(2018-2022)使用国家体质调查的数据引入指南,运动表现和锻炼习惯。
    结果:指南的引入与运动和体育活动持续时间的减少有关(男孩,-4.8[95%CI-5.9,-3.8]分钟/天;女孩,-5.5[95%CI-6.2,-4.8]分钟/天)和20米穿梭跑的性能(男孩,-1.2[95%CI-1.4,-1.0]圈;女孩,-2.3[95%CI-2.5,-2.2]圈)。
    结论:在引入了限制学校体育俱乐部活动的指导方针之后,青少年的运动或运动和心肺健康水平下降。
    OBJECTIVE: We examined whether introduction of national guidelines limiting sports club activities at school was associated with adolescents\' exercise and cardiorespiratory fitness.
    METHODS: We conducted interrupted time-series analysis to quantify the changes in prefecture-level aggregated data on exercise or sports activities and 20-m shuttle run (indicator of cardiorespiratory fitness) among adolescents in Japan before (2013-2017) and after (2018-2022) the introduction of the guidelines using data from the National Survey of Physical Fitness, Athletic Performance and Exercise Habits.
    RESULTS: The introduction of the guidelines was associated with reductions in exercise and sports activities duration (boys, -4.8 [95% CI -5.9, -3.8] min/day; girls, -5.5 [95% CI -6.2, -4.8] min/day) and performance of 20-m shuttle run (boys, -1.2 [95% CI -1.4, -1.0] laps; girls, -2.3 [95% CI -2.5, -2.2] laps).
    CONCLUSIONS: After introducing guidelines limiting sports club activities at school, levels of exercise or sports and cardiorespiratory fitness declined among adolescents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    The effective implementation of myopia prevention and control interventions is the foundation of achieving the goal of myopia prevention and control in China. However, relevant guidance documents for the implementation and evaluation of myopia prevention and control interventions are still lacking. Therefore, after in-depth research and summarizing relevant practical experiences, the Vision Health Branch of Chinese Association for Student Nutrition and Health Promotion and the Public Health Ophthalmology Branch of Chinese Preventive Medicine Association discussed and proposed the Chinese expert consensus on comprehensive public health intervention for myopia prevention and control in children and adolescents. The consensus develops a theoretical framework of comprehensive intervention actions for myopia prevention and control from the perspective of public health, creates six comprehensive intervention actions, including the establishment of vision health records and myopia risk assessment, evaluation of vision care related behaviors and the development of proper eye-use behaviors, health education for teachers, students and parents, improvement of reading and writing environment at home and school, 2 hours of daytime outdoor activities, hierarchical management and medical orthosis of myopia, and proposes a system of indicators for the implementation and effectiveness evaluation of myopia intervention actions, so as to provide a cost-effective and universally appropriate public health prescription for myopia prevention and control in children and adolescents.
    近视防控干预行动有效实施是实现我国近视防控目标的基础。然而,近视防控干预的实施与评价仍然缺乏指导性文件。因此,中国学生营养与健康促进会视力健康分会、中华预防医学会公共卫生眼科分会经深入研究并总结相关实践经验,讨论形成《中国儿童青少年近视防控公共卫生综合干预行动专家共识》。本共识从公共卫生视域构建近视防控综合干预行动理论框架,形成视力健康档案建立与近视风险评估、视力保健行为评价与合理用眼行为养成、师生家长全员健康教育、家校读写环境改善、日间户外活动2 h、近视分级管理与医学矫正等6项综合干预行动,提出实施与效果评价指标体系,为儿童青少年近视防控工作提供经济有效、普遍适宜的公共卫生“处方”。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:本研究旨在比较多面实施策略(多面组)与离散实施策略(离散组)的有效性,以实施瑞典《工作场所预防精神健康问题指南》中的主要干预结果-疲惫-压力的次要结果,健康,recovery,社会心理安全气候,以及社会和组织风险因素。另一个目的是检查主要和次要结果是否根据指南依从性水平而有所不同。与集团无关。
    方法:在19所瑞典公立学校中进行了6个月和12个月随访的整群随机等待名单对照试验。通过自我报告问卷评估主要和次要结果以及指南依从性。线性混合模型用于比较两组之间从基线到6个月和12个月的结果差异,并与不同的坚持水平有关。
    结果:该试验包括698名员工(83.1%)参与。6个月时,两组的主要和次要结局没有差异,而在12个月时,观察到一些结局的差异,这对离散组有利。更好的指南依从性与12个月时疲惫和心理社会安全环境的次要结果的改善有关。工作组织和工作内容,人际关系和领导力,并在6个月和12个月内恢复。
    结论:在改善健康结果或组织和社会工作环境方面,多方面的实施策略并不比离散策略更有效。然而,对指南的更高依从性与健康结果以及组织和社会工作环境的更大改善有关,无论采用何种实施策略。
    This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the multifaceted implementation strategy (multifaceted group) versus a discrete implementation strategy (discrete group) for implementing the Swedish Guideline for the Prevention of Mental Ill-health Problems at the Workplace on the primary intervention outcome - exhaustion - and secondary outcomes of stress, health, recovery, psychosocial safety climate, and social and organizational risk factors. Another aim was to examine whether the primary and secondary outcomes differed on the basis of guideline adherence levels, irrespective of the group.
    A cluster-randomized waiting-list controlled trial with 6- and 12-months follow-up was conducted among 19 Swedish public schools. Primary and secondary outcomes as well as guideline adherence were assessed by self-reported questionnaire. Linear mixed modeling was used to compare differences in outcomes between the groups from baseline to 6 and 12 months, and in relation to different adherence levels.
    The trial comprised 698 employees (83.1%) participated. There were no differences between groups in the primary and secondary outcomes at 6 months, while at 12 months differences were observed for some outcomes to the advantage of the discrete group. Better guideline adherence was associated with improvements in exhaustion at 12 months and the secondary outcomes of psychosocial safety climate, work organization and job content, interpersonal relations and leadership, and recovery over 6 and 12 months.
    The multifaceted implementation strategy was no more effective than the discrete strategy in improving health outcomes or organizational and social work environment. However, higher adherence to the guideline was associated with larger improvements in health outcomes and organizational and social work environment, irrespective of the implementation strategy used.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号