Scandinavian and Nordic Countries

斯堪的纳维亚和北欧国家
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:主动脉瓣感染性心内膜炎(IE)与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。我们的目的是描述临床概况,主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)治疗的主动脉瓣IE患者与非感染性心脏瓣膜病行AVR对照组相比,短期和长期死亡率的危险因素和预测因子.
    方法:在2008年1月至2013年12月之间,从斯堪的纳维亚半岛的三家拥有心胸设施的三级医院招募了170例接受AVR治疗的IE患者(暴露队列)和677例随机选择的非感染性AVR治疗的退行性主动脉瓣疾病患者(对照)。使用Cox回归模型估计粗略和调整后的风险比(HR)。
    结果:IE队列的平均年龄为58.5±15.1岁(80.0%男性)。在平均7.8年(IQR5.1-10.8年)的随访期间,发生373例(44.0%)死亡:IE组81例(47.6%),对照组292例(43.1%)。与IE相关的独立危险因素为男性,以前的心脏手术,体重不足,丙型肝炎血清学阳性,肾功能衰竭,先前的伤口感染和牙科治疗(所有p<0.05)。IE与短期(≤30天)的风险增加相关(HR2.86,[1.36-5.98],p=0.005)和长期死亡率(HR2.03,[1.43-2.88],p<0.001)。在IE患者中,慢性阻塞性肺疾病(HR2.13),体重不足(HR4.47),肾衰竭(HR2.05),合并二尖瓣受累(HR2.37)和纵隔炎(HR3.98)是长期死亡率的独立预测因子.金黄色葡萄球菌是最普遍的微生物(21.8%),与早期死亡风险增加5.2倍相关。而肠球菌与长期死亡风险相关(HR1.78).
    结论:在这项多中心病例对照研究中,与对照组相比,IE与短期和长期死亡率风险增加相关。应努力查明,并及时处理与承包IE相关的可修改风险因素,并减轻IE生存不良的预测因素。
    BACKGROUND: Aortic valve infective endocarditis (IE) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to describe the clinical profile, risk factors and predictors of short- and long-term mortality in patients with aortic valve IE treated with aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared with a control group undergoing AVR for non-infectious valvular heart disease.
    METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2013, a total of 170 cases with IE treated with AVR (exposed cohort) and 677 randomly selected non-infectious AVR-treated patients with degenerative aortic valve disease (controls) were recruited from three tertiary hospitals with cardiothoracic facilities across Scandinavia. Crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox regression models.
    RESULTS: The mean age of the IE cohort was 58.5 ± 15.1 years (80.0% men). During a mean follow-up of 7.8 years (IQR 5.1-10.8 years), 373 (44.0%) deaths occurred: 81 (47.6%) in the IE group and 292 (43.1%) among controls. Independent risk factors associated with IE were male gender, previous heart surgery, underweight, positive hepatitis C serology, renal failure, previous wound infection and dental treatment (all p < 0.05). IE was associated with an increased risk of both short-term (≤ 30 days) (HR 2.86, [1.36-5.98], p = 0.005) and long-term mortality (HR 2.03, [1.43-2.88], p < 0.001). In patients with IE, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 2.13), underweight (HR 4.47), renal failure (HR 2.05), concomitant mitral valve involvement (HR 2.37) and mediastinitis (HR 3.98) were independent predictors of long-term mortality. Staphylococcus aureus was the most prevalent microbe (21.8%) and associated with a 5.2-fold increased risk of early mortality, while enterococci were associated with the risk of long-term mortality (HR 1.78).
    CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter case-control study, IE was associated with an increased risk of both short- and long-term mortality compared to controls. Efforts should be made to identify, and timely treat modifiable risk factors associated with contracting IE, and mitigate the predictors of poor survival in IE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:缺乏可靠的预后标志物对炎症性肠病(IBD)的治疗提出了挑战。患有侵袭性疾病的患者可能无法接受常规“逐步升级”疗法的充分治疗,而自上而下的方法可能会使患有惰性疾病的患者面临不必要的治疗相关毒性。北欧IBD治疗策略试验(NORDTREAT)的目的是通过根据诊断时的预后血清蛋白特征对患者进行分层来评估个性化治疗的可行性。
    方法:NORDTREAT是一个多中心,生物标志物策略设计,开放标签对照试验。经过筛选同意,符合条件的患者被随机(1:1)分为两组:获得蛋白质标签的组和未获得蛋白质标签的组.在获得蛋白质签名组中,显示提示侵袭性疾病病程风险增加的蛋白质特征的患者将按照自上而下的治疗算法(抗肿瘤坏死因子剂有/无免疫调节剂)进行治疗.相比之下,那些具有表明无痛性疾病的蛋白质特征的患者将被排除在试验之外.非接入组的患者接受基于临床管理的治疗。这种传统管理涉及一线治疗失败后研究者确定的逐步升级治疗。52周后,在具有表明潜在严重疾病轨迹的蛋白质谱的患者亚组中评估结局.主要终点是52周时无皮质类固醇临床和内镜缓解的患者比例的复合。在随访期间由于IBD引起的手术干预将被定义为治疗失败。
    背景:已获得伦理批准,正在四个参与的北欧国家(丹麦,冰岛,挪威和瑞典)。在试验完成和数据分析之后,试验结果将提交给同行评审期刊发表,并在国际会议上发表.
    背景:NCT05180175;预结果。EudraCT编号:2019-002942-19。
    BACKGROUND: The absence of reliable prognostic markers poses a challenge to the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Patients with aggressive disease may not receive sufficient treatment with conventional \'step-up\' therapy, whereas a top-down approach may expose patients with indolent disease to unnecessary treatment-related toxicity. The objective of the Nordic IBD treatment strategy trial (NORDTREAT) is to assess the feasibility of personalised therapy by stratifying patients according to a prognostic serum protein signature at diagnosis.
    METHODS: NORDTREAT is a multicentre, biomarker-strategy design, open-label controlled trial. After screening consent, eligible patients are randomised (1:1) into one of two groups: a group with access to the protein signature and a group without access. In the access to protein signature group, patients displaying a protein signature suggestive of an increased risk of an aggressive disease course will be treated in line with a top-down treatment algorithm (anti-tumour necrosis factor agent with/without an immunomodulator). In contrast, those with a protein signature indicative of indolent disease will be excluded from the trial. Patients not in the access group receive treatment based on clinical management. This traditional management involves a stepwise escalation of treatment as determined by the investigator after failure of first-line treatment. After 52 weeks, outcomes are assessed in the subgroup of patients with a protein profile indicating a potentially severe disease trajectory. The primary endpoint is a composite of the proportion of patients with corticosteroid-free clinical and endoscopic remission at week 52. Surgical intervention due to IBD during follow-up will be defined as treatment failure.
    BACKGROUND: Ethical approval has been obtained, and recruitment is underway at sites in four participating Nordic countries (Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Sweden). Following trial completion and data analysis, the trial results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences.
    BACKGROUND: NCT05180175; Pre-results. EudraCT number: 2019-002942-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:根据妊娠早期感染或接种covid-19疫苗,评估重大先天性畸形的风险。
    方法:基于北欧注册的前瞻性研究。
    方法:瑞典,丹麦,挪威。
    方法:343066例瑞典出生的单胎婴儿,丹麦,挪威,估计在2020年3月1日至2022年2月14日之间开始怀孕,使用国家卫生登记处确定。
    方法:使用EUROCAT(欧洲先天性异常监测)定义对主要先天性异常进行分类。妊娠早期covid-19感染或接种疫苗后的风险通过逻辑回归评估,调整产妇年龄,奇偶校验,教育,收入,原产国,吸烟,身体质量指数,慢性疾病,和怀孕开始的估计日期。
    结果:17704例(5.2%)婴儿有严重的先天性异常。在评估妊娠早期与covid-19感染相关的风险时,调整后的比值比范围为:眼部异常的0.84(95%置信区间0.51~1.40),口面裂的1.12(0.68~1.84).同样,妊娠早期与covid-19疫苗接种相关的风险范围从神经系统异常的0.84(0.31~2.31)到腹壁缺损的1.69(0.76~3.78).11个异常亚组中有10个的估计值小于1.04,表明风险没有显着增加。
    结论:妊娠早期Covid-19感染和疫苗接种与先天性异常的风险无关。
    To evaluate the risk of major congenital anomalies according to infection with or vaccination against covid-19 during the first trimester of pregnancy.
    Prospective Nordic registry based study.
    Sweden, Denmark, and Norway.
    343 066 liveborn singleton infants in Sweden, Denmark, and Norway, with an estimated start of pregnancy between 1 March 2020 and 14 February 2022, identified using national health registries.
    Major congenital anomalies were categorised using EUROCAT (European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies) definitions. The risk after covid-19 infection or vaccination during the first trimester was assessed by logistic regression, adjusting for maternal age, parity, education, income, country of origin, smoking, body mass index, chronic conditions, and estimated date of start of pregnancy.
    17 704 (5.2%) infants had a major congenital anomaly. When evaluating risk associated with covid-19 infection during the first trimester, the adjusted odds ratio ranged from 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.51 to 1.40) for eye anomalies to 1.12 (0.68 to 1.84) for oro-facial clefts. Similarly, the risk associated with covid-19 vaccination during the first trimester ranged from 0.84 (0.31 to 2.31) for nervous system anomalies to 1.69 (0.76 to 3.78) for abdominal wall defects. Estimates for 10 of 11 subgroups of anomalies were less than 1.04, indicating no notable increased risk.
    Covid-19 infection and vaccination during the first trimester of pregnancy were not associated with risk of congenital anomalies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估依帕格列净与依帕格列净的比较心血管和肾脏有效性和安全性达格列净在2型糖尿病患者中的常规临床实践。
    方法:使用瑞典全国注册的数据进行队列研究,丹麦和挪威,从2014年6月到2021年6月,包括141065新用户empagliflozin和58306新用户dapagliflozin。共同主要结果是主要心血管事件(心肌梗死,中风,和心血管死亡),心力衰竭(因心力衰竭住院或死亡)和严重肾脏事件(肾脏替代疗法,因肾脏事件住院,和肾脏原因死亡)。次要结局是主要结局的各个组成部分,任何原因导致死亡和糖尿病酮症酸中毒。
    结果:使用empagliflozin与达格列净与主要心血管事件的风险相似(调整后的发病率:15.9vs.每1000人年15.8起事件;HR1.02,[95%CI0.97-1.08]),心力衰竭(6.5vs.6.3例事件/1000人年;HR1.05[0.97-1.14])和严重肾脏事件(3.7vs.4.1事件/1000人年;HR0.97[0.87-1.07])。在次要结果分析中,使用empagliflozin的HR与dapagliflozin用于心肌梗死为1.00(0.93-1.07),行程1.03(0.95-1.12),1.01(0.92-1.13)心血管死亡,1.06(1.00-1.11)任何原因死亡,0.77(0.60-0.99)用于肾脏替代治疗,1.20(0.75-1.93)肾死亡,1.01(0.90-1.12)用于肾事件住院,1.12(0.94-1.33)用于糖尿病酮症酸中毒。
    结论:使用依帕格列净和达格列净与心血管和肾脏结局的风险相似,死亡率和糖尿病酮症酸中毒。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the comparative cardiovascular and renal effectiveness and safety of empagliflozin vs. dapagliflozin among patients with type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice.
    RESULTS: Cohort study using data from nationwide registers in Sweden, Denmark, and Norway, from June 2014 to June 2021 included 141 065 new users of empagliflozin and 58 306 new users of dapagliflozin. Coprimary outcomes were major cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death), heart failure (hospitalization or death because of heart failure) and serious renal events (renal replacement therapy, hospitalization for renal events, and death from renal causes). Secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary outcomes, any cause death, and diabetic ketoacidosis. Use of empagliflozin vs. dapagliflozin was associated with similar risk of major cardiovascular events [adjusted incidence rate: 15.9 vs. 15.8 events per 1000 person-years; HR 1.02, (95% confidence interval 0.97-1.08)], heart failure [6.5 vs. 6.3 events per 1000 person-years; HR 1.05 (0.97-1.14)] and serious renal events [3.7 vs. 4.1 events per 1000 person-years; HR 0.97 (0.87-1.07)]. In secondary outcome analyses, the HRs for use of empagliflozin vs. dapagliflozin were 1.00 (0.93-1.07) for myocardial infarction, 1.03 (0.95-1.12) for stroke, 1.01 (0.92-1.13) for cardiovascular death, 1.06 (1.00-1.11) for any cause death, 0.77 (0.60-0.99) for renal replacement therapy, 1.20 (0.75-1.93) for renal death, 1.01 (0.90-1.12) for hospitalization for renal events and 1.12 (0.94-1.33) for diabetic ketoacidosis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Use of empagliflozin and dapagliflozin was associated with similar risk of cardiovascular and renal outcomes, mortality, and diabetic ketoacidosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究指出了癫痫患者在疾病负担和获得医疗护理方面的差异。我们研究了孕妇癫痫患者的社会经济地位(SES)与抗癫痫药物(ASM)使用之间的关系。
    方法:我们进行了一项横断面研究,包括2006-2017年期间从北欧注册中确定的21130例孕妇癫痫。SES指标包括同居状态,移民背景,教育程度,和家庭收入。主要结局是从怀孕前90天到出生的ASM使用的比例和模式。我们应用了多重插补来处理有2%-4%错误的SES变量。我们使用改良的Poisson回归以最高SES类别作为参考,估计了调整风险比(aRR)和95%置信区间(CIs)。
    结果:受教育程度最高,收入最高的五分之一的母亲使用ASM的频率最低(56%和53%,分别)。我们观察到,在低SES的前三个月之前或期间,ASM停药的风险增加。风险估计取决于SES指标,从低收入的aRR=1.27(95%CI:1.03-1.57)到低教育的aRR=1.66(95%CI:1.30-2.13)。移民背景与妊娠早期开始ASM相关(aRR2.17;95%CI1.88-2.52)。在单药治疗(aRR1.70;95%CI1.29-2.24)和综合治疗(aRR2.65;95%CI1.66-4.21)中,低教育程度与妊娠期间使用丙戊酸钠相关。根据所使用的ASM,低教育程度还与从一种ASM转换到另一种ASM的风险增加37%至39%相关。对于其他SES指标,转换的RR变化从1.16(外国来源;95%CI1.08-1.26)到1.26(未结婚或同居;95%CI1.17-1.36)。
    结论:低SES与风险较高的ASM使用模式有关:停药,迟到的开始,在怀孕期间转换。这些发现可能反映了意外怀孕,在获得先入为主的咨询方面存在差异,和次优护理。
    OBJECTIVE: Research points to disparities in disease burden and access to medical care in epilepsy. We studied the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and antiseizure medication (ASM) use in pregnancies with maternal epilepsy.
    METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study consisting of 21 130 pregnancies with maternal epilepsy identified from Nordic registers during 2006-2017. SES indicators included cohabitation status, migrant background, educational attainment, and household income. Main outcomes were the proportion and patterns of ASM use from 90 days before pregnancy to birth. We applied multiple imputation to handle SES variables with 2%-4% missingness. We estimated adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using modified Poisson regression with the highest SES category as reference.
    RESULTS: Mothers with the highest education and the highest income quintile used ASMs least frequently (56% and 53%, respectively). We observed increased risks of ASM discontinuation prior to or during the first trimester for low SES. The risk estimates varied depending on the SES indicator from aRR = 1.27 for low income (95% CI: 1.03-1.57) to aRR = 1.66 for low education (95% CI: 1.30-2.13). Migrant background was associated with ASM initiation after the first trimester (aRR 2.17; 95% CI 1.88-2.52). Low education was associated with the use of valproate during pregnancy in monotherapy (aRR 1.70; 95% CI 1.29-2.24) and in polytherapy (aRR 2.65; 95% CI 1.66-4.21). Low education was also associated with a 37% to 39% increased risk of switching from one ASM to another depending on the ASM used. For the other SES indicators, aRRs of switching varied from 1.16 (foreign origin; 95% CI 1.08-1.26) to 1.26 (not married or cohabiting; 95% CI 1.17-1.36).
    CONCLUSIONS: Low SES was associated with riskier patterns of ASM use: discontinuation, late initiation, and switching during pregnancy. These findings may reflect unplanned pregnancies, disparities in access to preconception counseling, and suboptimal care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:炎症性肠病(IBD),包括溃疡性结肠炎和克罗恩病,诊断可能很有挑战性,治疗结果难以预测。在NORDTREAT队列研究中,北欧前瞻性多中心研究,我们旨在通过评估诊断测试的准确性(横截面)来鉴定具有诊断价值的新型分子生物标志物,以及在长期(队列研究)中用作预后标志物时的预后效用。在诊断测试准确性研究中,与作为参考标准的ECCO标准相比,主要结局是在基线时使用一项或多项新型指数测试成功诊断.预后效用研究的复合结局是“严重IBD”在纳入后52周内,定义为以下三个事件中的一个或多个:IBD相关手术,IBD相关住院或IBD相关死亡。
    方法:我们的目标是招募800名怀疑IBD的患者参与这项纵向观察研究,丹麦11个收录网站之间的合作,冰岛,挪威和瑞典。纳入将于2022年2月至2023年12月进行,所有参与者的筛查和基线访问以及IBD诊断患者基线后第12、26和52周的3次结果访问。生物材料(血液,粪便,活检,尿液和头发),临床数据和生活方式信息将在这些定期访视期间收集.
    背景:这项研究将探索新型生物标志物,以提高诊断准确性和疾病进展的预测,从而改善IBD患者的药物治疗和生活质量。本研究得到伦理委员会(DK:S-20200051,v1.4,16.10.2021;IS:VSNb2021070006/03.01,NO:193064;SE:DNR2021-05090)和丹麦数据保护机构(20/54594)的批准。结果将通过同行评审的期刊传播,患者协会和在国际会议上的演讲。
    背景:NCT05414578;预结果。
    BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis and Crohn\'s disease, can be challenging to diagnose, and treatment outcomes are difficult to predict. In the NORDTREAT cohort study, a Nordic prospective multicentre study, we aim to identify novel molecular biomarkers of diagnostic value by assessing the diagnostic test accuracy (cross-sectionally), as well as the prognostic utility when used as prognostic markers in the long-term (cohort study). In the diagnostic test accuracy study, the primary outcome is a successful diagnosis using one or more novel index tests at baseline compared with the ECCO criteria as the reference standard. The composite outcome of the prognostic utility study is \'severe IBD\' within 52 weeks from inclusion, defined as one or more of the following three events: IBD-related surgery, IBD-related hospitalisation or IBD-related death.
    METHODS: We aim to recruit 800 patients referred on suspicion of IBD to this longitudinal observational study, a collaboration between 11 inclusion sites in Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. Inclusion will occur from February 2022 until December 2023 with screening and baseline visits for all participants and three outcome visits at weeks 12, 26 and 52 after baseline for IBD-diagnosed patients. Biological material (blood, faeces, biopsies, urine and hair), clinical data and lifestyle information will be collected during these scheduled visits.
    BACKGROUND: This study will explore novel biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy and prediction of disease progression, thereby improving medical therapy and the quality of life for patients with IBD.The study is approved by the Ethics Committee (DK: S-20200051, v1.4, 16.10.2021; IS: VSNb2021070006/03.01, NO: 193064; SE: DNR 2021-05090) and the Danish Data Protecting Agency (20/54594). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, patient associations and presentations at international conferences.
    BACKGROUND: NCT05414578; Pre-results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:浸泡在水中有已知的好处,例如减少疼痛和缩短分娩时间。水分娩与会阴损伤之间的关系尚不清楚。
    目的:比较低危妇女水中分娩和陆地分娩会阴损伤的发生率。次要结果是产后出血和5分钟Apgar评分<7。
    方法:对2875名计划在丹麦家庭分娩的低风险妇女进行前瞻性队列研究,冰岛,挪威,和瑞典在2008-2013年进行了自然阴道分娩,没有干预。进行描述性统计和逻辑回归。
    结果:共有942名妇女发生了水胎,1933年在陆地上出生。这些小组的各种背景变量有所不同。多胎妇女会阴完整的比例略低(59.3%vs.63.9%)和初产妇的会阴切开术发生率较低(1.1%vs.4.8%)在水中出生比在陆地上出生。经校正的回归分析未检测到有统计学意义的差异(初产妇的aOR=1.03,CI0.68-1.58;经产妇的aOR=0.84,CI0.67-1.05)。括约肌损伤的发生率(0.9%vs.0.6%)两组均较低。在次要结果中没有检测到显著差异。
    结论:在经产妇女中,完整会阴的发生率降低是适度的,没有定论,括约肌损伤的患病率较低。
    结论:考虑水胎的低风险妇女应被建议权衡本研究中发现的风险和益处与先前确定的水胎益处,并应根据她们的价值观做出明智的选择。
    OBJECTIVE: Immersion in water has known benefits, such as reducing pain and shortening the duration of labour. The relationship between waterbirth and perineal injury remains unclear.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of perineal injury in waterbirth and birth on land among low-risk women. Secondary outcomes were postpartum haemorrhage and 5-minute Apgar scores <7.
    METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 2875 low-risk women who planned a home birth in Denmark, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden in 2008-2013 and had a spontaneous vaginal birth without intervention. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed.
    RESULTS: A total of 942 women had a waterbirth, and 1933 gave birth on land. The groups differed in their various background variables. Multiparous women had moderately lower rates of intact perineum (59.3% vs. 63.9%) and primiparous women had lower rates of episiotomies (1.1% vs. 4.8%) in waterbirth than in birth on land. No statistically significant differences were detected in adjusted regression analysis on intact perineum in waterbirth (primiparous women\'s aOR = 1.03, CI 0.68-1.58; multiparous women\'s aOR = 0.84, CI 0.67-1.05). The rates of sphincter injuries (0.9% vs. 0.6%) were low in both groups. No significant differences were detected in secondary outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: The decreased incidence of intact perineum among multiparous women was modest and inconclusive, and the prevalence of sphincter injury was low.
    CONCLUSIONS: Low-risk women contemplating waterbirth should be advised to weigh the risks and benefits detected in this study against previously established benefits of waterbirth and should make an informed choice based on their values.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨使用胰高血糖素样肽1(GLP1)受体激动剂是否与甲状腺癌风险增加相关。
    方法:斯堪的纳维亚队列研究。
    方法:丹麦,挪威,瑞典,2007-21年。
    方法:将开始GLP1受体激动剂治疗的患者与开始二肽基肽酶4(DPP4)抑制剂治疗的患者进行比较,在额外的分析中,开始钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂治疗的患者.
    方法:从全国癌症登记中确定的甲状腺癌。使用主动比较新的用户研究设计,以最大程度地减少使用真实世界的药物效应研究产生的混淆和时间相关偏差的风险。Cox回归用于估计风险比,用倾向得分加权控制潜在的混杂因素。
    结果:GLP1受体激动剂组的平均随访时间为3.9年(标准差3.5年),DPP4抑制剂组为5.4年(标准差3.5年)。接受GLP1受体激动剂治疗的145410例患者中有76例(发生率1.33例/10000人年)和接受DPP4抑制剂治疗的291667例患者中有184例(发生率1.46例/10000人年)发展为甲状腺癌。使用GLP1受体激动剂与甲状腺癌风险增加无关(风险比0.93,95%置信区间0.66至1.31;比率差异-0.13,95%置信区间-0.61至0.36事件/10000人年)。甲状腺髓样癌的风险比为1.19(0.37至3.86)。在比较GLP1受体激动剂组和SGLT2抑制剂组的其他分析中,甲状腺癌的风险比为1.16(0.65~2.05).
    结论:在这项使用来自三个国家的全国性数据的大型队列研究中,在平均3.9年的随访中,GLP1受体激动剂的使用与甲状腺癌风险的大幅增加无关。在比较GLP1受体激动剂与DPP4抑制剂的主要分析中,置信区间的上限与相对风险增加不超过31%一致.
    To investigate whether use of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) receptor agonists is associated with increased risk of thyroid cancer.
    Scandinavian cohort study.
    Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, 2007-21.
    Patients who started GLP1 receptor agonist treatment were compared with patients who started dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitor treatment, and in an additional analysis, patients who started sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor treatment.
    Thyroid cancer identified from nationwide cancer registers. An active-comparator new user study design was used to minimise risks of confounding and time related biases from using real world studies of drug effects. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios, controlling for potential confounders with propensity score weighting.
    The mean follow-up time was 3.9 years (standard deviation 3.5 years) in the GLP1 receptor agonist group and 5.4 years (standard deviation 3.5 years) in the DPP4 inhibitor group. 76 of 145 410 patients (incidence rate 1.33 events per 10 000 person years) treated with GLP1 receptor agonists and 184 of 291 667 patients (incidence rate 1.46 events per 10 000 person years) treated with DPP4 inhibitors developed thyroid cancer. GLP1 receptor agonist use was not associated with increased risk of thyroid cancer (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 1.31; rate difference -0.13, 95% confidence interval -0.61 to 0.36 events per 10 000 person years). The hazard ratio for medullary thyroid cancer was 1.19 (0.37 to 3.86). In the additional analysis comparing the GLP1 receptor agonist group with the SGLT2 inhibitor group, the hazard ratio for thyroid cancer was 1.16 (0.65 to 2.05).
    In this large cohort study using nationwide data from three countries, GLP1 receptor agonist use was not associated with a substantially increased risk of thyroid cancer over a mean follow-up of 3.9 years. In the main analysis comparing GLP1 receptor agonists with DPP4 inhibitors, the upper limit of the confidence interval was consistent with no more than a 31% increase in relative risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:极早产儿,定义为28周胎龄之前出生的人,是一个非常脆弱的患者群体,面临不良后果的高风险,如坏死性小肠结肠炎和死亡。坏死性小肠结肠炎是一种炎症性胃肠道疾病,在该队列中发病率很高,对发病率和死亡率有严重影响。先前的随机对照试验表明,补充益生菌后,年龄较大的早产儿坏死性小肠结肠炎的发生率降低。然而,这些试验对极度早产儿的作用不足,迄今为止,该人群补充益生菌的证据不足。
    方法:斯堪的纳维亚极端早产益生菌(PEPS)试验是一个多中心,双盲,在瑞典6个三级新生儿病房和丹麦4个新生儿病房出生的极早产儿(n=1620)中进行了安慰剂对照和基于注册的随机对照试验.登记的婴儿将被分配接受ProPrems®(婴儿双歧杆菌,乳酸双歧杆菌,和嗜热链球菌)在3mL母乳中稀释,或每天在3mL母乳中稀释的安慰剂(0.5g麦芽糊精粉),直至妊娠第34周。主要复合结局是坏死性小肠结肠炎的发生率和/或死亡率。次要结果包括迟发性败血症的发生率,住院时间,使用抗生素,喂养耐受性,增长,足月年龄和出院后3个月校正年龄时的身体成分。
    结论:由于缺乏证据,目前瑞典和丹麦对益生菌补充剂的建议并不包括极度早产儿。然而,这一年轻亚组尤其是出现不良结局的风险最大.该试验旨在研究补充益生菌对坏死性小肠结肠炎的影响,死亡,和其他相关结果,以提供足够的动力,高质量的证据为该人群的益生菌补充指南提供信息。结果可能对瑞典和丹麦以及全世界的临床实践产生影响。
    背景:(Clinicaltrials.gov):NCT05604846。
    BACKGROUND: Extremely preterm infants, defined as those born before 28 weeks\' gestational age, are a very vulnerable patient group at high risk for adverse outcomes, such as necrotizing enterocolitis and death. Necrotizing enterocolitis is an inflammatory gastrointestinal disease with high incidence in this cohort and has severe implications on morbidity and mortality. Previous randomized controlled trials have shown reduced incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis among older preterm infants following probiotic supplementation. However, these trials were underpowered for extremely preterm infants, rendering evidence for probiotic supplementation in this population insufficient to date.
    METHODS: The Probiotics in Extreme Prematurity in Scandinavia (PEPS) trial is a multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled and registry-based randomized controlled trial conducted among extremely preterm infants (n = 1620) born at six tertiary neonatal units in Sweden and four units in Denmark. Enrolled infants will be allocated to receive either probiotic supplementation with ProPrems® (Bifidobacterium infantis, Bifidobacterium lactis, and Streptococcus thermophilus) diluted in 3 mL breastmilk or placebo (0.5 g maltodextrin powder) diluted in 3 mL breastmilk per day until gestational week 34. The primary composite outcome is incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis and/or mortality. Secondary outcomes include incidence of late-onset sepsis, length of hospitalization, use of antibiotics, feeding tolerance, growth, and body composition at age of full-term and 3 months corrected age after hospital discharge.
    CONCLUSIONS: Current recommendations for probiotic supplementation in Sweden and Denmark do not include extremely preterm infants due to lack of evidence in this population. However, this young subgroup is notably the most at risk for experiencing adverse outcomes. This trial aims to investigate the effects of probiotic supplementation on necrotizing enterocolitis, death, and other relevant outcomes to provide sufficiently powered, high-quality evidence to inform probiotic supplementation guidelines in this population. The results could have implications for clinical practice both in Sweden and Denmark and worldwide.
    BACKGROUND: ( Clinicaltrials.gov ): NCT05604846.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号