Scabies

sc 疮
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于过分拥挤的生活条件和有限的医疗保健资源,在监狱中,镰刀是一个普遍存在的问题。最近发表在《感染与公共卫生杂志》上的一项研究发现,在不同地区和设施的囚犯中,sc疮的患病率差异很大。本综述旨在通过进行系统评价和荟萃分析来确定囚犯中sc疮的全球患病率和预测因素。
    方法:我们遵循系统评价和荟萃分析检查表的首选报告项目来报告我们的系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。相关数据库,包括PubMed,科克伦图书馆,ScienceDirect,和其他灰色文献数据库被用来搜索和检索文章。该研究包括以英语编写的已发表和未发表的研究,用于报告囚犯中人sc疮的患病率。此评论已在PROSPERO上注册。使用I2统计量评估数据的异质性。使用STATA17软件进行荟萃分析,95%的置信区间。研究人员还进行了发表偏倚和敏感性分析。
    结果:该综述包括7项研究,涉及1,309,323名囚犯。所有纳入的研究都涉及横断面研究设计。囚犯中sc疮的患病率从意大利的0.72%到喀麦隆的41.01%不等。囚犯中人类sc疮的全球合并患病率为6.57%(95%CI;2.16-19.94)。根据亚组分析,非洲囚犯sc疮的总体患病率为19.55%(95%CI;9.44-40.45),而非洲以外囚犯的患病率为1.57%(95%CI;0.77-3.19)。在监狱里度过的时间,分享衣服或床,和卫生习惯被发现是与囚犯发展为人类sc疮的可能性显着相关的因素。
    结论:在全世界的囚犯中,人类sc疮的总体患病率很高。在监狱里呆更多时间的囚犯共用衣服或床位,卫生习惯差的人更有可能患上sc疮。因此,政策制定者和计划管理者应努力降低监狱中sc疮的患病率。本系统评价和荟萃分析的方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册簿中注册,注册号为CRD42024516064。
    BACKGROUND: Scabies is a widespread issue in prisons due to overcrowded living conditions and limited healthcare resources. A recent study published in the Journal of Infection and Public Health discovered that the prevalence of scabies varies greatly among prisoners in different regions and facilities. This review aimed to determine the global prevalence and predictors of scabies among prisoners by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    METHODS: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklist to report the findings of our systematic review and meta-analysis. Relevant databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and other grey literature databases were used to search and retrieve articles. The study included both published and unpublished research written in English languages for studies reporting the prevalence of human scabies among prisoners. This review has been registered on PROSPERO. The heterogeneity of the data was evaluated using the I2 statistic. A meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 17 software, with a 95% confidence interval. The researchers also conducted publication bias and sensitivity analysis.
    RESULTS: The review included 7 studies involving 1, 309,323 prisoners. All included studies involved cross-sectional study design. The prevalence of scabies among prisoners ranges from 0.72% in Italy to 41.01% in Cameroon. The global pooled prevalence of human scabies among prisoners was found to be 6.57% (95% CI; 2.16-19.94). According to subgroup analysis, the overall prevalence of scabies among African prisoners was 19.55% (95% CI; 9.44-40.45), while the prevalence among prisoners outside of Africa was 1.57% (95% CI; 0.77-3.19). The length of time spent in prison, sharing of clothing or beds, and hygiene practices were found to be factors that were significantly associated with the likelihood of prisoners developing human scabies.
    CONCLUSIONS: The overall prevalence of human scabies is high among prisoners worldwide. Prisoners who spent more time in prison shared clothing or beds, and had poor hygiene practices were more likely to develop human scabies. Thus, efforts should be made by policymakers and program administrators to decrease the prevalence of scabies in prisons. The protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews with registration number CRD42024516064.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:每年,全球有1.754亿人感染了sc疮。虽然寄生虫感染是重要的医院感染,与细菌相比,它们是无法识别的,真菌,和病毒感染。特别是,sc疮的非特异性皮肤表现导致诊断延迟和频繁的医院传播。基于医院的sc疮危险因素研究尚未进行系统审查。
    方法:该研究遵循PRISMA指南,并在PROSPERO(CRD42023363278)中进行了前瞻性注册。文献检索在三个国际(PubMed,Embase,和CINAHL)和四个韩国人(DBpia,吻,RISS,和ScienceON)数据库。我们纳入了以医院为基础的研究,并以95%的置信区间计算了sc疮感染的危险因素。使用JoannaBriggs研究所的关键评估工具评估研究的质量。两位作者独立进行筛选并评估研究质量。
    结果:共纳入12项研究。个人特征被归类为人口统计,经济,住宅,和行为因素。确定的风险因素是低经济状况和不卫生的行为习惯。作为长期护理机构或机构的患者是一个重要因素。经常与患者接触和缺乏个人防护设备被确定为危险因素。对于临床特征,因素分为个人健康和医院环境。与发痒的人接触过的人患sc疮的风险更高。严重程度较高的患者和具有大量导管的患者也面临增加的sc疮感染风险。
    结论:医院中sc疮的因素从个人到临床不等。我们强调,当患者出现sc疮症状并从疗养院和辅助生活设施等场所转移时,进行全面皮肤检查的重要性,以减少sc疮的传播。此外,对患者进行教育,以预防c疮和医护人员的感染控制系统,例如穿戴个人防护装备,是需要的。
    BACKGROUND: Annually, 175.4 million people are infected with scabies worldwide. Although parasitic infections are important nosocomial infections, they are unrecognized compared to bacterial, fungal, and viral infections. In particular, nonspecific cutaneous manifestations of scabies lead to delayed diagnosis and frequent nosocomial transmission. Hospital-based studies on the risk factors for scabies have yet to be systematically reviewed.
    METHODS: The study followed the PRISMA guidelines and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023363278). Literature searches were conducted in three international (PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL) and four Korean (DBpia, KISS, RISS, and Science ON) databases. We included hospital-based studies with risk estimates calculated with 95% confidence intervals for risk factors for scabies infection. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Two authors independently performed the screening and assessed the quality of the studies.
    RESULTS: A total of 12 studies were included. Personal characteristics were categorized into demographic, economic, residential, and behavioral factors. The identified risk factors were low economic status and unhygienic behavioral practices. Being a patient in a long-term care facility or institution was an important factor. Frequent patient contact and lack of personal protective equipment were identified as risk factors. For clinical characteristics, factors were categorized as personal health and hospital environment. People who had contact with itchy others were at higher risk of developing scabies. Patients with higher severity and those with a large number of catheters are also at increased risk for scabies infection.
    CONCLUSIONS: Factors contributing to scabies in hospitals range from personal to clinical. We emphasize the importance of performing a full skin examination when patients present with scabies symptoms and are transferred from settings such as nursing homes and assisted-living facilities, to reduce the transmission of scabies. In addition, patient education to prevent scabies and infection control systems for healthcare workers, such as wearing personal protective equipment, are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目标:结痂(CS,挪威sc疮)是sc疮的严重形式,以Sarcoptesscabiei螨的过度侵染为特征。CS通常与免疫抑制有关,但也有明显免疫活性个体的报道。我们回顾了与CS相关的免疫抑制危险因素和合并症。
    方法:从1998年1月至2023年7月,对美国国家医学图书馆(PubMed)数据库中的CS患者病例报告进行了审查。两位作者筛选了合格记录,提取的数据,一个人批判性地评价了研究的质量。
    背景:PROSPEROCRD42023466126.
    结果:确定了436条记录,其中204项被纳入系统审查。从这些,纳入683例CS患者。CS对两种性别的影响相同。成人(21-59岁)比儿童(0-20岁,21%)。使用皮质类固醇是确定的最普遍的免疫抑制危险因素(占所有病例的27.7%)。10.2%的报告与艾滋病毒/艾滋病有关,和HTLV-1感染的8.5%。10.5%的患者具有明显的免疫能力,没有已知的危险因素。总的来说,41人(6.0%)死亡,许多继发于继发性菌血症。
    结论:本研究是对与CS相关的免疫抑制危险因素进行的首次系统评价。这提供了对免疫抑制趋势和CS发展机制的见解。
    OBJECTIVE: Crusted scabies (CS, Norwegian scabies) is a severe form of scabies, characterized by hyper-infestation of Sarcoptes scabiei mites. CS is commonly associated with immunosuppression but is also reported in overtly immunocompetent individuals. We reviewed immunosuppressive risk factors and comorbidities associated with CS.
    METHODS: The National Library of Medicine (PubMed) database was reviewed for patient case reports of CS from January 1998 to July 2023. Two authors screened records for eligibility, extracted data, and one critically appraised the quality of the studies.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42023466126.
    RESULTS: A total of 436 records were identified, of which 204 were included for systematic review. From these, 683 CS patients were included. CS impacted both genders equally. Adults (21-59 years) were more commonly affected (45.5%) compared to children (0-20 years, 21%). Corticosteroid use was the most prevalent immunosuppressive risk factor identified (27.7% of all cases). About 10.2% of reports were associated with HIV/AIDS, and 8.5% with HTLV-1 infection. 10.5% of patients were overtly immunocompetent with no known risk factors. Overall, 41 (6.0%) died, many subsequent to secondary bacteremia.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first systematic review undertaken on immunosuppressive risk factors associated with CS. This provides insights into trends of immunosuppression and mechanisms of CS development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    镰刀菌是由骨刺引起的人类外寄生虫病。hominis.全球约有3亿患者受到影响。婴儿和儿童的发病率最高。贫穷和过度拥挤是导致传播和治疗失败风险增加的社会因素。感染的主要症状是瘙痒。并发症是导致死亡的细菌感染。诊断是临床的。可以使用诸如皮肤镜检查的非侵入性成像技术。聚合酶链反应(PCR)的敏感性和特异性低于皮肤刮片的显微镜检查。选择的治疗方法是局部使用氯菊酯5%。伊维菌素是FDA批准的唯一口服药物。它应用于对局部治疗无反应的情况下,以及除局部治疗外,感染患者人数众多的情况下。对治疗的假性抗性并不少见。新药即将出现。已知:•瘙痒是导致睡眠障碍和抓挠的主要症状,具有继发细菌感染的风险。•治疗失败与局部用药不当和无症状的家庭成员有关。新增内容:•COVID-19大流行和移民导致sc疮发病率增加。•治疗sc疮的新化合物即将出现。
    Scabies is a human ectoparasitosis caused by Sarcoptes scabei var. hominis. World-wide around 300 million patients are affected. Infants and children have the highest incidence rates. Poverty and overcrowding are social factors contributing to a higher risk of transmission and treatment failure. The leading symptom of the infestation is itch. Complications are bacterial infections that are responsible for mortality. Diagnosis is clinical. Non-invasive imaging technologies like dermoscopy can be used. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is less sensitive and specific than microscopy of skin scrapings. Treatment of choice is topical permethrin 5%. Ivermectin is the only oral drug FDA-approved for scabies. It should be used in cases non-responsive to topical therapy and in case of high number of infested patients in addition to topical therapy. Pseudo-resistance to treatment is not uncommon. New drugs are on the horizon. What is Known: • Pruritus is the leading symptom causing sleep disturbances and scratching with the risk of secondary bacterial infections. • Treatment failure is related to inappropriate application of topical drugs and asymptomatic family members. What is New: • COVID-19 pandemic and migration are contributing to an increased incidence of scabies. • New compounds to treat scabies are on the horizon.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:挪威sc疮是一种罕见的皮肤病学表现,通常会影响最脆弱的人群,如老年人和免疫功能低下的患者,它的诊断非常复杂,由于其在普通人群中的患病率较低,并且具有广谱表现。
    方法:在这里,我们描述了一个罕见的挪威sc疮病例,该病例先前在患有唐氏综合征的16岁患者中被误诊,我们对该主题进行了非系统的文献综述。病变不典型,瘙痒并伴随着手掌和脚底的周期性脱屑,经过一系列专家评估,她最终接受了局部治疗,完全缓解。
    结论:因此,考虑唐氏综合症与社区获得性结痂的sc疮之间的关系至关重要。为了采取预防措施,早期发现,和适当的治疗。
    BACKGROUND: Norwegian scabies is a rare dermatological manifestation that usually affects the most fragile populations, such as elderly and immunocompromised patients, and its diagnosis is quite complex, due to its low prevalence in the general population and because of a broad spectrum manifestation.
    METHODS: Here we describe a rare case of Norwegian scabies that was previously misdiagnosed in a sixteen year old patient affected by Down syndrome and we conducted a non-systematic literature review about this topic. Lesions were atypical, pruritic and associated with periodic desquamation of the palms and soles and after a series of specialist evaluations, she finally underwent topical treatment with complete remission.
    CONCLUSIONS: It is therefore crucial to take in consideration the relation between Down syndrome and community acquired crusted scabies, to enable preventative measures, early detection, and proper treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Sarcopticmange,由Sarcoptesscabiei引起的,是一种影响许多哺乳动物的疾病,包括欧洲阿尔卑斯山地区的几种野生有蹄类动物,尤其是阿尔卑斯山的羚羊和阿尔卑斯山的羊,充当寄生虫水库。在这里,回顾了高山野生有蹄类动物中mange的记录及其在欧洲阿尔卑斯山东部的传播。1824年从奥地利记录了第一批病例,此后从奥地利山区(主要是蒂罗尔,卡林顿,和施蒂里亚),德国(巴伐利亚),意大利(乌迪内和特伦蒂诺)和斯洛文尼亚。瑞士,相比之下,到目前为止,除了野猪的病例,表明该物种不是欧洲阿尔卑斯山其他有蹄类动物的食宿,而且,到目前为止,反刍动物有蹄类动物的疾病仅限于阿尔卑斯山的东部和中部。野生和家养反刍动物之间的相互传播是可能的,保护脆弱的野生动物,也是监控的原因,如有必要,干预,以遏制曼格爆发。
    Sarcoptic mange, caused by Sarcoptes scabiei, is a disease that affects many species of mammals, including several wild ungulate species in the region of the European Alps, especially the Alpine chamois and the Alpine ibex, which act as parasite reservoirs. Here records of mange in alpine wild ungulates and its spread over time across the eastern parts of the European Alps are reviewed. First cases were recorded from Austria in 1824, and epizootic outbreaks have been described since then from the mountainous regions of Austria (mostly Tyrol, Carinthia, and Styria), Germany (Bavaria), Italy (Udine and Trentino) and Slovenia. Switzerland, by contrast, has so far been free of mange except for cases in wild boar, indicating that this species is not a reservoir host of sarcoptic mites for other ungulate species in the European Alps, and that, so far, the disease in ruminant ungulates is restricted to the eastern and central parts of the Alps. Mutual transmission among wild and domestic ruminants is possible and, together with the protection of vulnerable wildlife, is also a reason for monitoring and, if necessary, intervention to contain mange outbreaks.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目前有限的数据表征了无家可归(PEH)人群的皮肤病及其危险因素。我们进行了系统评价,以调查PEH的皮肤病的类型,他们的危险因素,并在为该患者人群提供皮肤病护理时提供解决方案。我们搜索了PubMed,EMBASE和Cochrane从2012年到2022年以英语撰写的文章。最后一次搜索是在2022年12月27日进行的。12项研究符合纳入标准。58%的研究发生在美国(n=7),42%的研究发生在加拿大(n=5)。普遍的皮肤病包括,皮肤癌,营养不良的皮肤表现,皮肤白喉,A组链球菌感染(iGAS),虱子,特应性皮炎,痤疮,性传播感染(STIs),和金黄色葡萄球菌感染。危险因素包括物质使用障碍,皮肤创伤,没有防晒霜或帽子,不稳定的住房,更多的极端天气暴露,更高的流动性。由于研究在美国或加拿大进行,结果可能无法推广。此系统评价强烈表明,PEH中流行的许多皮肤病可导致皮肤完整性差。更好的措施可以通过改善获得皮肤病护理的机会来显著减少某些皮肤病。
    Limited data is present that characterizes dermatological conditions and their risk factors in people experiencing homelessness (PEH).We conducted a systematic review to investigate the types of dermatological conditions in PEH, their risk factors, and provide solutions when providing dermatological care to this patient population. We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane for articles written in English from 2012 to 2022. The last search was performed on December 27, 2022. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-eight percent of the studies took place in the USA (n = 7) and 42% of studies took place in Canada (n = 5). Prevalent dermatological conditions included, skin cancer, cutaneous manifestations of malnutrition, cutaneous diphtheria, Group A Streptococcus infection (iGAS), lice, atopic dermatitis, acne, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and Staphylococcus aureus infections. Risk factors included substance use disorder, skin trauma, not having access to sunscreen or hats, unstable housing, higher exposure to extreme weather, and higher mobility. Due to studies being conducted in the USA or Canada, results may not be generalizable. This systematic review strongly suggests that many dermatological conditions prevalent in PEH can be contributed to poor skin integrity. Better measures can significantly reduce certain dermatological conditions by improving access to dermatological care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:治疗失败被认为是过去十年中sc疮发病率增加的重要因素。然而,治疗失败的区域和时间差异以及预测因素尚不清楚.
    目的:系统评价sc疮患者治疗失败的发生率及相关因素。
    方法:我们搜索了MEDLINE,EMBASE,CINAHL,WebofScience,Scopus,全球卫生和CochraneCentral从成立到2021年8月进行随机和准随机试验,以及纳入儿童或成人诊断为使用氯菊酯治疗的确诊或临床sc疮的观察性研究,伊维菌素,Crotamiton,苯甲酸苄酯,马拉硫磷,硫磺,或者林丹,和测量治疗失败或与治疗失败相关的因素。我们对至少两项研究报告的所有结果进行了随机效应荟萃分析。
    结果:147项研究合格。治疗失败的总患病率为15.2%(95%CI:12.9~17.6;I2=95.3%,中度确定性证据),世卫组织区域之间的差异(P=0.003)在西太平洋区域最高(26.9%[95%CI:14.5至41.2])。口服伊维菌素(11.8%[95%CI:8.4至15.4]),与总体患病率相比,局部用伊维菌素(9.3%[95%CI:5.1~14.3])和氯菊酯(10.8%[95%CI:7.5~14.5])的失败患病率相对较低.与接受单剂量治疗的患者(15.2%[95%CI:10.8至20.2];P=0.021)相比,接受两种剂量口服伊维菌素治疗的患者的失败发生率较低(7.1%[95%CI:3.1至12.3]。纳入研究(1983-2021年)的总体和氯菊酯治疗失败的患病率每年增加0.27%和0.58%,分别。只有三项研究进行了多变量危险因素分析,没有人评估阻力。
    结论:第二剂量伊维菌素的失败发生率低于单剂量伊维菌素,应在所有指南中加以考虑。随着时间的推移,治疗失败的增加暗示了螨对几种药物的易感性降低,但很少评估失败的原因。理想情况下,在未来的研究中,应实施杀螨药敏试验.
    BACKGROUND: Treatment failure is considered to be an important factor in relation to the increase in scabies incidence over the last decade. However, the regional and temporal differences, in addition to the predictors of therapy failure, are unclear.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to conduct a systematic review of the prevalence of treatment failure in patients with scabies and investigation of associated factors.
    METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Global Health and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to August 2021 for randomized and quasi-randomized trials, in addition to observational studies that enrolled children or adults diagnosed with confirmed or clinical scabies treated with permethrin, ivermectin, crotamiton, benzyl benzoate, malathion, sulfur or lindane, and measured treatment failure or factors associated with treatment failure. We performed a random effects meta-analysis for all outcomes reported by at least two studies.
    RESULTS: A total of 147 studies were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. The overall prevalence of treatment failure was 15.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.9-17.6; I2 = 95.3%, moderate-certainty evidence] with regional differences between World Health Organization regions (P = 0.003) being highest in the Western Pacific region (26.9%, 95% CI 14.5-41.2). Oral ivermectin (11.8%, 95% CI 8.4-15.4), topical ivermectin (9.3%, 95% CI 5.1-14.3) and permethrin (10.8%, 95% CI 7.5-14.5) had relatively lower failure prevalence compared with the overall prevalence. Failure prevalence was lower in patients treated with two doses of oral ivermectin (7.1%, 95% CI 3.1-12.3) compared with those treated with one dose (15.2%, 95% CI 10.8-20.2; P = 0.021). Overall and permethrin treatment failure prevalence in the included studies (1983-2021) increased by 0.27% and 0.58% per year, respectively. Only three studies conducted a multivariable risk factor analysis; no studies assessed resistance.
    CONCLUSIONS: A second dose of ivermectin showed lower failure prevalence than single-dose ivermectin, which should be considered in all guidelines. The increase in treatment failure over time hints at decreasing mite susceptibility for several drugs, but reasons for failure are rarely assessed. Ideally, scabicide susceptibility testing should be implemented in future studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    镰刀菌是一种被忽视的热带病,继续产生全球影响和长期健康后果。它是由螨虫Sarcoptesscabeivar引起的。人类,它是一种专性的外寄生虫,生活在人类皮肤的表皮中。由于像养老院这样的地方人满为患,在贫穷的社区里很常见,监狱,无家可归和流离失所的儿童。然而,发达国家也容易感染sc疮,例如在战争条件下或自然灾害期间的机构爆发或小型流行病。脓肿的诊断可以通过侵入性和非侵入性工具来辅助;然而,病史和检查结果通常足以证实临床怀疑.这里,我们通过集中于诊断方法,对sc疮进行了最新的回顾,治疗,和预防疮。
    Scabies is a neglected tropical disease that continues to have global impacts and long-term health consequences. It is caused by the mite Sarcoptes scabei var. hominis, which is an obligate ectoparasite that lives in the epidermis of the human skin. Scabies is common in poor communities due to overcrowding in places like old age homes, prisons, and homeless and displaced children. However, developed countries are also susceptible to scabies infestations, such as in institutional outbreaks or small epidemics under war conditions or during natural disasters. The diagnosis of scabies may be assisted by invasive and noninvasive tools; However, the history and examination findings are usually adequate to confirm the clinical suspicion. Here, we present an updated review of scabies by focusing on the diagnostic approaches, treatment, and prevention of scabies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号