具有人口代表性的家庭调查方法需要最新的抽样框架和样本设计,以最大程度地减少实地考察的时间和成本,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。传统方法如多阶段整群抽样,随机游走,或者空间采样可能很麻烦,昂贵或不准确,导致众所周知的偏见。然而,一个新工具,Epicentre\'sGeo-Sampler程序,允许结构的简单随机抽样,这可以消除一些偏见。我们描述了研究设计过程,使用Geo-Sampler在危地马拉两个地点的肾脏疾病调查中选择人口代表样本的经验和教训。
我们成功地使用Epicentre的地理采样器工具对危地马拉两个半城市社区的650个结构进行了采样。总的来说,82%的抽样结构是住宅,可以招聘。经过30分钟的培训后,可以由一个人进行样品选择。从样品选择到创建现场图的过程大约花费了40小时。
结合我们的设计协议,EpicentreGeo-Sampler工具提供了一种可行的,快速且成本较低的替代方案,可在我们的危地马拉半城市环境中选择具有代表性的人群样本进行患病率调查。该工具在具有沉重的树栖覆盖物的环境中或在每个结构具有多个生活单元的人口稠密的城市环境中可能工作得不好。同样,虽然该方法是包括非传统生活安排(永久或暂时居住在企业中的人,宗教机构或其他结构),它不占人口中一些最边缘化和最脆弱的人-没有住房的人,街头居民或生活在车辆中的人。
Population-representative household survey methods require up-to-date sampling frames and sample designs that minimize time and cost of fieldwork especially in low- and middle-income countries. Traditional methods such as multi-stage cluster sampling, random-walk, or spatial sampling can be cumbersome, costly or inaccurate, leading to well-known biases. However, a new tool, Epicentre\'s Geo-Sampler program, allows simple random sampling of structures, which can eliminate some of these biases. We describe the study design process, experiences and lessons learned using Geo-Sampler for selection of a population representative sample for a kidney disease survey in two sites in Guatemala.
We successfully used Epicentre\'s Geo-sampler tool to sample 650 structures in two semi-urban Guatemalan communities. Overall, 82% of sampled structures were residential and could be approached for recruitment. Sample selection could be conducted by one person after 30 min of training. The process from sample selection to creating field maps took approximately 40 h.
In combination with our design protocols, the Epicentre Geo-Sampler tool provided a feasible, rapid and lower-cost alternative to select a representative population sample for a prevalence survey in our semi-urban Guatemalan setting. The tool may work less well in settings with heavy arboreal cover or densely populated urban settings with multiple living units per structure. Similarly, while the method is an efficient step forward for including non-traditional living arrangements (people residing permanently or temporarily in businesses, religious institutions or other structures), it does not account for some of the most marginalized and vulnerable people in a population-the unhoused, street dwellers or people living in vehicles.