BACKGROUND: Single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a commonly performed surgical procedure for L4-5 isthmic spondylolisthesis. Postoperative L5 pedicle fracture with rapidly progressive spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 segment after L4-5 PLIF/TLIF is quite rare, and the etiology remains unclear. This report describes this rare complication and proposes a possible etiology focusing on the lumbosacral sagittal imbalance characterized by an anteriorly shifted lumbar loading axis.
METHODS: The authors report a case complicated by L5 bilateral pedicle fractures and rapidly progressive spondylolisthesis at the L5-S1 segment very early after a single-level PLIF for L4-5 isthmic spondylolisthesis. Meyerding grade III anterolisthesis was observed at L5-S1 segment by 3 months after the initial surgery. Additional surgery was performed, and the fixation was extended to L4-ilium. Fracture healing was observed at 6 months postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: This complication may have been caused by abnormal local shear forces on the posterior neural arch of L5 vertebra and L5-S1 intervertebral disc, which were triggered by the fusion surgery for L4 shear-type spondylolisthesis. L4 sagittal vertical axis is considered a reasonable parameter representing lumbosacral sagittal imbalance with an anteriorly shifted loading axis and may be a candidate for the predictive parameters of this rare complication.

BACKGROUND: Parkinson\'s disease (PD) is a common neurogenerative disease marked by the characteristic triad of bradykinesia, rigidity, and tremor. A significant percentage of patients with PD also demonstrate postural abnormalities (camptocormia) that limit ambulation and accelerate degenerative pathologies of the spine. Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment for the motor fluctuations and tremor seen in PD, the efficacy of DBS on postural abnormalities in these patients is less clear.
METHODS: The authors present a patient with a history of PD and prior lumbosacral fusion who underwent bilateral subthalamic nucleus DBS and experienced immediate improvement in sagittal alignment and subjective relief of mechanical low-back pain.
CONCLUSIONS: DBS may improve postural abnormalities seen in PD and potentially delay or reduce the need for spinal deformity surgery.

To clarify the impact of restriction of hip extension on radiographic whole-body sagittal alignment with using postoperative changes of radiographical parameters for hip osteoarthritis.
We prospectively enrolled 68 patients with hip osteoarthritis scheduled for arthroplasty. Variables included manual examination of hip range of motion (H-ROM) and radiographic whole-body sagittal alignment parameters including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), center of acoustic meatus and femoral head offset (CAM-HA), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis, sacral slope (SS), and knee flexion angle (KF). We divided patients with preoperative hip extension angle < 0 into the extension restriction (ER) + group and ≥ 0 into the ER- group. Differences in H-ROM, radiographic parameters between groups and postoperative changes were comparatively analyzed.
Fifty-seven patients (The ER + group included 28 patients and the ER- group included 29 patients.) were available for the analysis. Pre-/postoperative H-ROM were 99.7 ± 24.9/118.1 ± 16.0 degrees (p < .01). Greater increases in SVA (5.4 ± 3.4 vs 3.4 ± 2.8 cm, p = .02) and in CAM-HA (3.9 ± 3.9 vs 2.8 ± 3.4 cm, p =  013) were found in the ER + group versus ER- group. Postoperatively, the ER + group showed an increase in TK (pre-/postoperative: 35.2 ± 9.7/37.4 ± 8.8 degrees, p = .04) and decreases in SS (36.5 ± 9.6/33.7 ± 9.9 degrees, p < .01) and KF (9.5 ± 7.0/6.9 ± 6.0 degrees, p = .02). Postoperative changes in radiographic parameters in the ER- group were not significant.
Patients with restriction of hip extension showed global spine imbalance, and significant changes in TK, SS, and KF were observed after arthroplasty. The presence of hip joint disorder and H-ROM restriction must be considered when evaluating spinopelvic alignment and whole-body sagittal alignment.

The purpose of this study was to report the characteristics of SIFs after ILSF and discuss its management focusing on pelvic deformation. We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients who underwent ILSF for degenerative disc diseases during the period between 2000 and 2017 and were diagnosed as SIF at our institute. The clinical and radiographic data were reviewed on their medical charts. Treatment outcomes for SIF were also investigated. Eight patients (all females) were included in this study. Mean age at SIF diagnosis was 72 years, and the mean follow-up period was 3.8 years (range 1-7 years). SIF developed average 7.5 years (range 1 month-17 years) after the index ILSF. Fracture patterns were unilateral vertical in four, bilateral vertical in three, and horizontal in 1 patient. Unlike patients with unilateral vertical SIF, patients with bilateral vertical or horizontal SIF showed a marked increase of pelvic incidence (PI) by mean 17.0°±5.0° and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) by mean 4.5 ± 2.2 cm, compared to the respective values before the onset of abrupt pain. All patients with unilateral vertical SIF were treated favorably by conservative management, however sacropelvic fixation was inevitable in patients with bilateral vertical or horizontal SIF. Bilateral vertical or horizontal SIF showed marked changes on sagittal radiographic parameters including PI and SVA. Although unilateral vertical SIF has benign courses that responded well to conservative management, bilateral vertical or horizontal SIF is likely to need surgical treatment. Treatment plan should be determined depending on fracture pattern and pelvic deformation.

UNASSIGNED: Scoliosis is a complex three-dimensional deformity. While the frontal profile is well understood, increasing attention has turned to balance in the sagittal plane. The present study evaluated changes in sagittal spino-pelvic parameters in a large Hungarian population with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
UNASSIGNED: EOS 2D/3D images of 458 scoliotic and 69 control cases were analyzed. After performing 3D reconstructions, the sagittal parameters were assessed as a whole and by curve type using independent sample t test and linear regression analysis.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with scoliosis had significantly decreased thoracic kyphosis (p < 0.001) with values T1-T12, 34.1 ± 17.1o vs. 43.4 ± 12.7o in control; T4-T12, 27.1 ± 18.8o vs. 37.7 ± 15.1o in control; and T5-T12, 24.9 ± 15.8o vs. 32.9 ± 15.0o in control. Changes in thoracic kyphosis correlated with magnitude of the Cobb angle (p < 0.001). No significant change was found in lumbar lordosis and the pelvic parameters. After substratification according to the Lenke classification and individually evaluating subgroups, results were similar with a significant decrease in only the thoracic kyphosis. A strong correlation was seen between sacral slope, pelvic incidence, and lumbar lordosis, and between pelvic version and thoracic kyphosis in control and scoliotic groups, whereas pelvic incidence was also seen to be correlated with thoracic kyphosis in scoliosis patients.
UNASSIGNED: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients showed a significant decrease in thoracic kyphosis, and the magnitude of the decrease was directly related to the Cobb angle. Changes in pelvic incidence were minimal but were also significantly correlated with thoracic changes. Changes were similar though not identical to those seen in other Caucasian studies and differed from those in other ethnicities. Scoliotic curves and their effect on pelvic balance must still be regarded as individual to each patient, necessitating individual assessment, although changes perhaps can be predicted by patient ethnicity.

U-shaped sacral fractures are uncommon and are mostly the consequence of a high-energy kinetic trauma. The sacrum is a crucial element for sagittal alignment in a standing position as it determines the value of the pelvic incidence, which is a fixed and unchanging parameter for a given individual. We report the case of a 21-year-old man who underwent corrective surgery for a type II U-shaped fracture of the sacrum (according to the Roy-Camille classification), associated with a S1-S2 dislocation and sacral kyphosis that modified the patient\'s pelvic incidence. At one-year follow-up, radiographic examinations revealed solid bony fusion and stable results after removal of the implants. The surgery was managed for neurological decompression, stabilization of the fracture and correction of sacral kyphosis. The restoration of the theoretical pelvic incidence depended on the estimated lumbar lordosis. The aim of this study was to highlight the particularities in the management of a sacral U-shaped fracture and their relationship with the sagittal alignment.

Advancements in the understanding of adult spinal deformity have led to a greater awareness of the role of the pelvis in maintaining sagittal balance and alignment. Pelvic incidence has emerged as a key radiographic measure and should closely match lumbar lordosis. As proper measurement of the pelvic incidence requires accurate identification of the S-1 endplate, lumbosacral transitional anatomy may lead to errors. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate how lumbosacral transitional anatomy may lead to errors in the measurement of pelvic parameters. The current case highlights one of the potential complications that can be avoided with awareness. The authors report the case of a 61-year-old man who had undergone prior lumbar surgeries and then presented with symptomatic lumbar stenosis and sagittal malalignment. Radiographs showed a lumbarized S-1. Prior numbering of the segments in previous surgical and radiology reports led to a pelvic incidence calculation of 61°. Corrected numbering of the segments using the lumbarized S-1 endplate led to a pelvic incidence calculation of 48°. Without recognition of the lumbosacral anatomy, overcorrection of the lumbar lordosis might have led to negative sagittal balance and the propensity to develop proximal junction failure. This case illustrates that improper identification of lumbosacral transitional anatomy may lead to errors that could affect clinical outcome. Awareness of this potential error may help improve patient outcomes.