Reconstruction

重建
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:全髌骨切除术目前保留用于特殊情况,如顽固性髌股不稳定和粉碎性骨折,由于其对膝关节生物力学的负面影响。因此,管理髌骨切除术对于减轻其固有的有害影响至关重要。已经描述了各种技术,包括自体或同种异体骨移植,用于重建和软组织重新对齐,以增强伸肌机制。
    方法:一名73岁的男性因粉碎性骨折接受了髌骨切除术,随后发展为骨关节炎并经历功能状态下降。同时进行全膝关节置换,我们做了髌骨重建,结合常规的骨切割和利用骨片来形成新的髌骨。这种干预导致完全伸展的恢复和膝关节功能的改善。
    结论:髌骨重建显示了对膝关节力学和稳定性的益处,有助于提高膝关节置换术后的结果和满意度。我们提出了一种负担得起的技术来管理接受全膝关节置换术的成年患者。
    BACKGROUND: Total patellectomy is currently reserved for exceptional cases, such as recalcitrant patellofemoral instability and comminuted fractures, due to its demonstrated negative impact on knee biomechanics. Therefore, managing patellectomy is crucial to mitigate its inherent deleterious effects. Various techniques have been described, including autologous or allogeneic bone grafts for reconstruction and soft tissue realignment to enhance the extensor mechanism.
    METHODS: A 73-year-old male underwent a patellectomy due to a comminuted fracture, subsequently developing osteoarthritis and experiencing a decline in functional status. Concurrent with total knee replacement, we conducted a patellar reconstruction, incorporating routine bone cuts and utilizing bone chips to fashion a new patella. This intervention resulted in the restoration of full extension and improvement of knee function.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patellar reconstruction demonstrates benefits on knee mechanics and stabilization, contributing to enhanced outcomes and satisfaction following knee replacement. We present an affordable technique for managing patellectomized patients undergoing total knee replacement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    前交叉韧带(ACL)断裂是一种普遍的运动损伤,其发生率上升归因于人口参与体育活动的增加。ACL断裂可导致严重的膝关节并发症,包括软骨损伤,半月板撕裂,和骨关节炎。目前的治疗选择包括保守措施和手术干预。然而,关于最佳方法的辩论仍在继续。
    此分析旨在比较功能,膝关节稳定性,ACL断裂患者保守治疗和手术治疗之间的二次手术发生率。
    通过Embase进行了系统搜索,OvidMedline,PubMed,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,和谷歌学者报告ACL破裂后保守和手术治疗的结果。结果包括患者报告的结果测量(PROMs),膝关节稳定性,需要二次半月板手术,延迟ACL重建手术,和修正ACL重建手术。使用平均差异或奇数比(OR)和95%CI分析结果。
    11项研究纳入1516例患者。对于PROM,我们的证据表明KOOS疼痛没有差异,KOOS症状,KOOSSport/Rec,KOOSADL,和KOOSQOL。(均p>0.05)。为了膝盖的稳定性,枢轴移位(或,0.14;p<0.001),拉赫曼测试(或,0.06;p<0.001),和胫骨平移(p<0.001)进行了评估,现有证据支持手术治疗而不是保守治疗。对于首次诊断后任何二次手术的发生率,手术组半月板手术率较低,具有统计学意义(OR,0.37;p<0.001)。修正ACL重建率平均为5.80%,保守治疗后ACL重建延迟率为18.51%。
    目前,没有足够的经验证据支持任何撕裂ACL的患者进行系统的手术重建.这篇综述发现保守治疗和手术治疗之间的功能结果没有差异。关于膝关节稳定性和二次半月板手术,结果更喜欢手术治疗。翻修和ACL重建延迟的发生率是不可忽视的因素,在选择合适的治疗方法之前,必须由外科医生和患者充分了解。
    UNASSIGNED: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a prevalent sports injury with rising rates attributed to increased population participation in sports activities. ACL rupture can lead to severe knee complications including cartilage damage, torn meniscus, and osteoarthritis. Current treatment options include conservative measures and surgical interventions. However, debates persist regarding the optimal approach.
    UNASSIGNED: This analysis intended to compare the function, knee stability, and incidence rate of secondary surgery between conservative and surgical treatments in ACL rupture patients.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic search was performed via Embase, Ovid Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for reporting outcomes of conservative and surgical treatments after ACL rupture. The outcomes included patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), knee stability, the need for secondary meniscal surgery, delayed ACL reconstruction surgery, and revision ACL reconstruction surgery. Outcomes were analyzed using mean differences or odd ratios (OR) with 95 % CIs.
    UNASSIGNED: 11 studies were included with 1516 patients. For PROMs, our evidence indicated no differences in KOOS Pain, KOOS Symptoms, KOOS Sport/Rec, KOOS ADL, and KOOS QOL. (all p > 0.05). for knee stability, pivot shift (OR, 0.14; p < 0.001), Lachman test (OR, 0.06; p < 0.001), and tibia translation (p < 0.001) were evaluated, and the available evidence favored surgical treatment over conservative treatment. For the incidence rate of any secondary surgery after the first diagnosis, the surgical group showed a lower rate of meniscal surgery with statistical significance (OR, 0.37; p < 0.001). The average rate of revision ACL reconstruction is 5.80 %, while the rate of delayed ACL reconstruction after conservative treatment is 18.51 %.
    UNASSIGNED: Currently, there is insufficient empirical evidence to advocate a systematic surgical reconstruction for any patient who tore his ACL. This review found no differences in function outcomes between conservative and surgical treatments. Regarding knee stability and secondary meniscal surgery, the results prefer the surgical treatments. The occurrence rate of revision and delayed ACL reconstruction are non-negligible factors that must be fully understood by both surgeons and patients before choosing a suitable treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:晚期外阴外阴癌患者需要多学科治疗方法,以确保肿瘤安全性,及时恢复,和最高的生活质量(QoL)。该地区的重建经常导致并发症,影响约30%的患者。皮瓣设计已经发展到基于穿孔器的方法,以减少功能缺陷和(供体部位)并发症。因为它们可以保存相关的解剖结构。除了他们在海拔方面更大的手术挑战之外,它们相对于基于非穿孔器的方法的优越性仍在争论中。
    方法:为了比较穿支和非穿支皮瓣在女性外阴外阴外阴重建中的效果,我们对1980年后发表的英语研究进行了系统的回顾,包括随机对照试验,队列研究,案例系列。使用Clavien-Dindo分类法提取并分类人口统计学和手术结果的数据。我们使用随机效应荟萃分析得出至少接受一个穿支皮瓣的患者和接受非穿支皮瓣的患者的并发症频率(%)的汇总估计值。
    结果:在2576项筛选研究中,49符合我们的纳入标准,包括1840名患者。接受穿支(n=276)或非穿支皮瓣(n=1564)重建的患者的总体短期手术并发症发生率相当(p*>0.05)。使用穿支皮瓣时,并发症有减少的趋势。对患者QoL的评估很少。
    结论:与非穿支皮瓣相比,使用穿支皮瓣的外阴外阴重建显示出良好的效果。需要评估其长期结果并对患者QoL进行系统评估,以进一步证明其对受影响患者的益处。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced vulvoperineal cancer require a multidisciplinary treatment approach to ensure oncological safety, timely recovery, and the highest possible quality of life (QoL). Reconstructions in this region often lead to complications, affecting approximately 30% of patients. Flap design has evolved towards perforator-based approaches to reduce functional deficits and (donor site) complications, since they allow for the preservation of relevant anatomical structures. Next to their greater surgical challenge in elevation, their superiority over non-perforator-based approaches is still debated.
    METHODS: To compare outcomes between perforator and non-perforator flaps in female vulvoperineal reconstruction, we conducted a systematic review of English-language studies published after 1980, including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series. Data on demographics and surgical outcomes were extracted and classified using the Clavien-Dindo classification. We used a random-effects meta-analysis to derive a pooled estimate of complication frequency (%) in patients who received at least one perforator flap and in patients who received non-perforator flaps.
    RESULTS: Among 2576 screened studies, 49 met our inclusion criteria, encompassing 1840 patients. The overall short-term surgical complication rate was comparable in patients receiving a perforator (n = 276) or a non-perforator flap (n = 1564) reconstruction (p* > 0.05). There was a tendency towards fewer complications when using perforator flaps. The assessment of patients\' QoL was scarce.
    CONCLUSIONS: Vulvoperineal reconstruction using perforator flaps shows promising results compared with non-perforator flaps. There is a need for the assessment of its long-term outcomes and for a systematic evaluation of patient QoL to further demonstrate its benefit for affected patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    复杂的结构,化学成分,颅面软骨结构的生物力学特性使其重建具有挑战性。自体移植物的组织可用性有限,可导致显著的供体部位发病率。同源移植物通常需要免疫抑制,和同种异体移植物可能有很高的感染率或移位率。此外,所有这些移植技术都需要高水平的手术技能,以确保重建与原始结构相匹配。目前的研究表明,增材制造在克服这些限制方面显示出了希望。当暴露于适当的生长因子和培养条件时,自体干细胞已发育成软骨。如机械应力和缺氧。当工程用于干细胞培养的支架时,增材制造允许提高精度。对材料的孔隙率和结构的精细控制确保了移植物和缺损之间的足够的细胞粘附和配合。最近的一些组织工程研究集中在气管上,鼻子,耳朵,因为这些结构经常被先天条件损坏,创伤,和恶性肿瘤。本文回顾了当前重建技术的局限性以及气管增材制造的新进展,鼻部,和耳软骨.
    The complex structure, chemical composition, and biomechanical properties of craniofacial cartilaginous structures make them challenging to reconstruct. Autologous grafts have limited tissue availability and can cause significant donor-site morbidity, homologous grafts often require immunosuppression, and alloplastic grafts may have high rates of infection or displacement. Furthermore, all these grafting techniques require a high level of surgical skill to ensure that the reconstruction matches the original structure. Current research indicates that additive manufacturing shows promise in overcoming these limitations. Autologous stem cells have been developed into cartilage when exposed to the appropriate growth factors and culture conditions, such as mechanical stress and oxygen deprivation. Additive manufacturing allows for increased precision when engineering scaffolds for stem cell cultures. Fine control over the porosity and structure of a material ensures adequate cell adhesion and fit between the graft and the defect. Several recent tissue engineering studies have focused on the trachea, nose, and ear, as these structures are often damaged by congenital conditions, trauma, and malignancy. This article reviews the limitations of current reconstructive techniques and the new developments in additive manufacturing for tracheal, nasal, and auricular cartilages.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:慢性骨髓炎是一种使人衰弱的骨感染,以持续感染数月至数年为特征,由于其阴险的性质以及严重的骨骼和软组织破坏的可能性,因此提出了诊断和治疗挑战。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在回顾有关长骨慢性骨髓炎治疗的文献,并评估单阶段手术与两阶段手术的治愈率。
    方法:遵循PRISMA指南并在PROSPERO(ID:CRD42021231237)注册,本综述纳入了报道在成人患者中采用计划的一期或二阶段手术方法治疗长骨慢性骨髓炎的研究.搜索的数据库包括Medline,Embase,WebofScience,CINAHL,HMIC,AMED,使用与骨髓炎相关的关键词,长骨,和手术管理。资格标准侧重于长骨慢性骨髓炎的成年人,在最少12个月的随访后报告结局.荟萃分析利用随机效应模型来汇集治愈率。
    结果:分析包括42项研究,共1605例患者。整体合并治愈率为91%(CI95%),单阶段和两阶段手术间无显著差异(X2=0.76,P>0.05)。单阶段手术中有26.6%的病例报告并发症,两阶段手术中有27.6%的病例报告并发症,长时间的伤口引流被认为是一个常见问题。死空间管理技术因研究而异,在30.4%的病例中使用负载抗生素的硫酸钙珠。
    结论:这项荟萃分析显示,长骨慢性骨髓炎的单阶段和两阶段手术治疗的治愈率没有显着差异,支持这两种方法的有效性。目前的治疗策略应包括清创术的组合,如有必要,使用局部和系统的抗生素和软组织重建的死腔管理。
    BACKGROUND: Chronic osteomyelitis is a debilitating bone infection, characterized by a persistent infection over months to years, poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to its insidious nature and potential for severe bone and soft tissue destruction. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to review the literature on the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis in long bones and assess cure rates in single versus two-stage surgery.
    METHODS: Following the PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021231237), this review included studies that reported on the management of chronic osteomyelitis in long bones using either a planned one-stage or two-stage surgical approach in adult patients. Databases searched included Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, HMIC, and AMED, using keywords related to osteomyelitis, long bones, and surgical management. Eligibility criteria focused on adults with chronic osteomyelitis in long bones, with outcomes reported after a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The meta-analysis utilized the random-effects model to pool cure rates.
    RESULTS: The analysis included 42 studies with a total of 1605 patients. The overall pooled cure rate was 91% (CI 95%) with no significant difference observed between single-stage and two-stage surgeries (X2 = 0.76, P > 0.05). Complications were reported in 26.6% of cases in single-stage procedures and 27.6% in two-stage procedures, with prolonged wound drainage noted as a common issue. Dead space management techniques varied across studies, with antibiotic-loaded calcium sulphate beads used in 30.4% of cases.
    CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis reveals no significant difference in cure rates between single and two-stage surgical treatments for chronic osteomyelitis in long bones, supporting the efficacy of both approaches. The current treatment strategy should include a combination of debridement, dead space management using local and systematic antibiotics and soft tissue reconstruction if necessary.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    前交叉韧带(ACL)修复在选择的近端或中质ACL撕裂患者中心获得了新的兴趣。因此,重要的是重新评估ACL修复的当代临床结局,以确定临床获益是否超过ACL重建金标准(ACLR).
    对(1)进行比较试验的荟萃分析,以确定ACL修复与ACLR之间是否存在临床结局和不良事件的差异,以及(2)综合现有试验的中期结局。
    系统评价;证据水平,3.
    PubMed,OVID/Medline,和Cochrane数据库于2023年8月查询了比较ACL修复和ACLR的前瞻性和回顾性临床试验。与撕裂位置有关的数据,外科技术,不良事件,并记录临床结局指标。DerSimonian-Laird随机效应模型被构建以定量评估ACL修复/ACLR之间的关联。不良事件,和临床结果。对至少5年结局进行亚分析。
    纳入了12项研究(893例患者;464例ACLR和429例ACL修复)。随机效应模型显示复发性不稳定/临床失败的相对风险(RR)较高(RR=1.64;95%置信区间[CI],1.04-2.57;P=.032),修订ACLR(RR=1.63;95%CI,1.03-2.59;P=0.039),和硬件去除(RR=4.94;95%CI,2.10-11.61;P=.0003)在接受原发性ACL修复与ACLR的患者中。两组之间的再手术RR和并发症(膝关节相关)没有显着差异。当比较患者报告的结果评分时,没有观察到显著差异。在至少5年结果的研究中,不良事件或Lysholm评分无显著差异.
    在ACL修复与ACLR的当代比较试验中,临床失败的RR,由于ACL再破裂而进行的翻修手术,与ACLR相比,主ACL修复的硬件删除更多。患者报告的结果评分没有观察到差异,重新操作,或方法之间与膝盖相关的并发症。在报道至少5年结局的有限文献中,未观察到不良事件或国际膝关节文献委员会评分的显著差异.
    UNASSIGNED: Primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair has gained renewed interest in select centers for patients with proximal or midsubstance ACL tears. Therefore, it is important to reassess contemporary clinical outcomes of ACL repair to determine whether a clinical benefit exists over the gold standard of ACL reconstruction (ACLR).
    UNASSIGNED: To (1) perform a meta-analysis of comparative trials to determine whether differences in clinical outcomes and adverse events exist between ACL repair versus ACLR and (2) synthesize the midterm outcomes of available trials.
    UNASSIGNED: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.
    UNASSIGNED: The PubMed, OVID/Medline, and Cochrane databases were queried in August 2023 for prospective and retrospective clinical trials comparing ACL repair and ACLR. Data pertaining to tear location, surgical technique, adverse events, and clinical outcome measures were recorded. DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models were constructed to quantitatively evaluate the association between ACL repair/ACLR, adverse events, and clinical outcomes. A subanalysis of minimum 5-year outcomes was performed.
    UNASSIGNED: Twelve studies (893 patients; 464 ACLR and 429 ACL repair) were included. Random-effects models demonstrated a higher relative risk (RR) of recurrent instability/clinical failure (RR = 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.57; P = .032), revision ACLR (RR = 1.63; 95% CI, 1.03-2.59; P = .039), and hardware removal (RR = 4.94; 95% CI, 2.10-11.61; P = .0003) in patients who underwent primary ACL repair versus ACLR. The RR of reoperations and complications (knee-related) were not significantly different between groups. No significant differences were observed when comparing patient-reported outcome scores. In studies with minimum 5-year outcomes, no significant differences in adverse events or Lysholm scores were observed.
    UNASSIGNED: In contemporary comparative trials of ACL repair versus ACLR, the RR of clinical failure, revision surgery due to ACL rerupture, and hardware removal was greater for primary ACL repair compared with ACLR. There were no observed differences in patient-reported outcome scores, reoperations, or knee-related complications between approaches. In the limited literature reporting on minimum 5-year outcomes, significant differences in adverse events or the International Knee Documentation Committee score were not observed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肌瘤的手术治疗是治疗的基石。然而,在对肌瘤病灶进行广泛的手术切除时,外科医生考虑如何闭合皮肤缺损,主要可以关闭,由次要强度治愈,通过皮肤移植或局部皮瓣。在这次审查中,我们展示了手术切除后肌瘤重建的各种应用和变化。
    这是一项系统的文献检索和综述,旨在确定提出肌瘤重建方案的文章。文章被确定,和出版时间,研究类型,学习时间,和研究国家进行了检查。此外,纳入这些文章中的所有患者.病人的名字,性别,临床表现,并确定了管理层。
    总共有9篇文章符合我们的纳入标准;其中8篇是病例报告,1是一个案例系列。第一例真菌瘤重建病例发表于1959年。出版国家因热带和非热带国家而异。这些文章中发现的患者总数为34名患者,其中大多数是男性。致病生物主要是eumycetoma。肌瘤病变的部位因大小而异。使用的重建选择是皮肤移植和局部或局部皮瓣,其中只有1例接受了游离皮瓣重建。
    如果皮肤闭合不可行且没有截肢指征,则应在小尺寸或大尺寸缺陷的子宫肌瘤手术后考虑重建子宫肌瘤。
    UNASSIGNED: Surgical treatments of mycetoma are a cornerstone in management. However, while doing a wide surgical excision of mycetoma lesion, surgeons think about how to close the skin defect, which can be closed primarily, left to heal by secondary intension, by skin grafts or local flaps. In this review, we demonstrate the various applications and changes of mycetoma reconstruction after surgical excision.
    UNASSIGNED: This is a systematic literature search and review conducted to determine articles presenting mycetoma reconstruction options. Articles were identified, and the time of publication, type of study, time of study, and country of study were checked. Additionally, all patients in those articles were included. Patients\' names, sex, clinical presentation, and management were identified.
    UNASSIGNED: A total number of 9 articles fulfilled our inclusion criteria; 8 of them are case reports, and 1 is a case series. The first mycetoma reconstruction case was published in 1959. The country of publication varies from tropical and non-tropical countries. The total number of patients found in those articles is 34 patients, most of whom are male. The causative organism is mainly eumycetoma. The site of mycetoma lesions is varied with variable sizes. The reconstruction options used were skin graft and local or regional flaps, where only 1 case underwent a free flap for reconstruction.
    UNASSIGNED: Reconstruction of mycetoma should be considered following mycetoma surgery in small or large size defects if skin closure is not feasible and there is no indication for amputation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:DarierFerrand皮肤纤维肉瘤(DFSP)是一种罕见的皮肤肿瘤,其特点是局部侵袭性和高复发潜力。它主要影响年轻人和中年人。其在头部和颈部区域的位置占所有DFSP的近12.5%。
    方法:我们报告了一例罕见的68岁患者,该患者接受了使用胸大肌肌皮瓣重建脸颊下部的DFSP治疗。术后过程顺利,美学效果良好。
    结论:DFSP是一种中度恶性肿瘤。其最佳管理基于完整的手术切除,需要对大型缺陷进行各种重建程序。尽管提出了靶向治疗和放射治疗技术的改进,但无法切除的病变的治疗仍然很困难。
    结论:DFSP的理想管理是基于在健康组织中进行的手术切除。这种情况需要早期诊断,并且是无病生存的保证,而在头颈部位置没有重大后遗症。
    BACKGROUND: Darier Ferrand Dermatofibrosarcoma (DFSP) is a rare skin tumor, characterized by its local aggressivity and high potential of recurrence. It affects mainly young and middle-aged adults. Its location in the head and neck region represents nearly 12.5 % of all DFSP.
    METHODS: We report a rare case of a 68-year-old patient who was treated for a DFSP of the cheek\'s lower part with reconstruction using a pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap. The postoperative course was uneventful and the aesthetic result was good.
    CONCLUSIONS: DFSP is a tumor of intermediate malignancy. Its optimal management is based on complete surgical excision requiring various reconstruction procedures for large defects. The treatment of unresectable lesions remains difficult despite the targeted therapies proposed and the improvement of radiotherapy techniques.
    CONCLUSIONS: The ideal management of a DFSP is based on surgical excision passing largely in healthy tissues. This situation requires early diagnosis and is the guarantee of disease-free survival without major sequelae in head and neck locations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:快速肠皮肤缝合线由于其组织反应性低而变得更加突出,快速吸收,和消除缝线移除访问。与其他闭合方式相比,肠缝线的速度如何尚不清楚。
    方法:进行了全面的文献综述,以确定比较皮肤手术中快速肠缝合与替代闭合方法的随机对照试验。收集的数据包括患者和医生评估的美容结果以及标准化并发症发生率。
    结果:六项研究纳入最终分析,并报告了208例患者。与聚丙烯缝线相比,快速肠缝线与较低的医师对最终瘢痕的看法相关(SMD0.438;95%CI0.082至0.794)。快速肠缝线和氰基丙烯酸酯组织粘合剂的医师意见之间没有差异(SMD-0.024;95%CI-0.605至0.556)。快速肠缝合放置的并发症很少见,包括感染,开裂,还有血肿.与组织粘合剂相比,快速肠缝线不太可能出现伤口裂开(p=0.01)。
    结论:如果聚丙烯缝线没有禁忌症,与快速肠道缝合相比,它们可能提供更好的美容效果。需要进一步的研究来更好地量化美容结果和最佳使用快速肠缝线。
    BACKGROUND: Fast gut cutaneous sutures have become more prominent due to their low tissue reactivity, rapid absorption, and elimination of suture removal visits. It is not known how fast gut sutures compare to other closure modalities.
    METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing fast gut sutures to alternative closure methods during dermatologic surgery. Data collected included patient and physician assessed cosmetic outcome as well as standardized complication rates.
    RESULTS: Six studies were included in final analysis and reported on 208 patients. Fast gut sutures were associated with lower physician opinions of final scar when compared to polypropylene sutures (SMD 0.438; 95% CI 0.082 to 0.794). No differences existed between physician opinion of fast gut sutures and cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (SMD - 0.024; 95% CI - 0.605 to 0.556). Complications with fast gut suture placement were rare, and included infection, dehiscence, and hematomas. Fast gut sutures were less likely to experience wound dehiscence than tissue adhesive (p = 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: If no contraindications to polypropylene sutures exist, they may provide superior cosmetic outcomes compared to fast gut sutures. Further research is required to better quantify cosmetic outcomes and optimal use of fast gut sutures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全球北部女性生殖器切割/切割(FGM/C)妇女的医疗保健通常被描述为次优,重点是产妇保健。FGM/C专家服务已经出现,几乎没有经验证据表明提供服务。这项范围审查的目的是确定FGM/C专家护理的关键特征。
    审查是根据JBI方法进行的。参与者:提供专业FGM/C护理的组织。概念:专业服务的组成部分。背景:高收入经合组织国家。资格标准包括2012年至2022年任何设计的主要研究研究,提供专业服务的全面描述。检索了七个书目数据库(MEDLINE,EMBASE,CINAHL,WebofScience,Scopus,Cochrane图书馆和MIC)。定义了“专家”(而不是“通才”)服务的组成部分,然后将其应用于FGM/C专家护理的分析。FGM/C专业规定分为主要(基本)和次要特征。通过图表和叙述性总结,对数据进行描述性提取和分析。
    25篇论文描述了11个高收入国家的20种独特的专业服务。用于识别FGM/C专家护理的主要特征是:-(i)指定为专家服务/诊所:11/20(55%);(ii)确定的专家领导:13/20,(65%),要么是助产士,妇科医生,泌尿科医生,或整形外科医生;(iii)提供专科干预:外科(即,重建和/或去阴锁)和/或心理(即,创伤和/或性咨询);(iv)提供多学科护理:14/20(70%)。11项服务(在西班牙,瑞典,瑞士,德国,意大利,荷兰,法国,比利时,和美国)提供了重建手术,通常与性心理支持相结合。在英国没有服务,挪威,澳大利亚提供了这个。六项服务(30%)仅提供创伤治疗;25%的性和创伤治疗;仅性治疗15%;30%没有提供咨询。专科护理的次要特征细分为(a)护理背景和(b)护理内容。与提供口译员等概念相关的背景,护理费用,社区参与以及是否描述了理论基础。内容指的是护理模式,是否进行了保护评估,并提供健康教育/信息。
    总的来说,FGM/C专家服务的功能和组成在两者之间差异很大,有时在内部,国家。全球指南主张,专科护理应包括获得脱音,心理健康支持,性咨询,教育和信息。审查发现,这些很少都可用。在一些高收入国家,妇女无法接受重建手术,尤其是,很少有针对非孕妇的服务提到保障措施。此外,为孕妇提供的综合创伤治疗或心理支持服务很少。审查强调需要将咨询(创伤和性心理)和文化上适当的敏感保障评估纳入非孕妇和孕妇的护理服务。需要进一步的研究来提取专家服务的特征到一个全面的框架,可以用来检查,比较,并评估FGM/C临床专科护理,以确定哪些临床特征可提供最佳结果。目前地理彩票似乎存在,不仅在英国,但也横跨全球北部。
    UNASSIGNED: Health care for women with Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) in the Global North is often described as sub-optimal and focused on maternity care. Specialist FGM/C services have emerged with little empirical evidence informing service provision. The objective of this scoping review is to identify the key features of FGM/C specialist care.
    UNASSIGNED: The review was conducted in accordance with JBI methodology. Participants: organisations that provide specialist FGM/C care. Concept: components of specialist services. Context: high-income OECD countries. Eligibility criteria included primary research studies of any design from 2012 to 2022, providing a comprehensive description of specialist services. Seven bibliographic databases were searched (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library and MIC). The components of \"specialist\" (as opposed to \"generalist\") services were defined and then applied to an analysis of FGM/C specialist care. FGM/C specialist provision was categorised into primary (essential) and secondary features. Data were extracted and analysed descriptively through charting in tables and narrative summary.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-five papers described 20 unique specialist services across eleven high income countries. Primary features used to identify FGM/C specialist care were:-(i) Named as a Specialist service/clinic: 11/20 (55%); (ii) Identified expert lead: 13/20, (65%), either Midwives, Gynaecologists, Urologist, or Plastic Surgeons; (iii) Offering Specialist Interventions: surgical (i.e., reconstruction and/or deinfibulation) and/or psychological (i.e., trauma and/or sexual counselling); and (iv) Providing multidisciplinary care: 14/20 (70%). Eleven services (in Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, France, Belgium, and USA) provided reconstruction surgery, often integrated with psychosexual support. No services in UK, Norway, and Australia offered this. Six services (30%) provided trauma therapy only; 25% sexual and trauma therapy; 15% sexual therapy only; 30% did not provide counselling. Secondary features of specialist care were subdivided into (a) context of care and (b) the content of care. The context related to concepts such as provision of interpreters, cost of care, community engagement and whether theoretical underpinnings were described. Content referred to the model of care, whether safeguarding assessments were undertaken, and health education/information is provided.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, the features and composition of FGM/C specialist services varied considerably between, and sometimes within, countries. Global guidelines advocate that specialist care should include access to deinfibulation, mental health support, sexual counselling, and education and information. The review found that these were rarely all available. In some high-income countries women cannot access reconstruction surgery and notably, few services for non-pregnant women mentioned safeguarding. Furthermore, services for pregnant women rarely integrated trauma therapy or psychosexual support. The review highlights a need for counselling (both trauma and psychosexual) and culturally-appropriate sensitive safeguarding assessments to be embedded into care provision for non-pregnant as well as pregnant women. Further research is needed to extract the features of specialist services into a comprehensive framework which can be used to examine, compare, and evaluate FGM/C clinical specialist care to determine which clinical features deliver the best outcomes. Currently a geographical lottery appears to exist, not only within the UK, but also across the Global North.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号