Race Factors

种族因素
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:从1982年的Pelotas出生队列研究中,研究成年人的社会流动性与牙齿脱落之间的关系,以及种族是否改变了这种关系。
    方法:口腔健康研究使用了541名随访至31岁的个体的数据。社会流动性,由参与者在出生时和30岁时的社会经济地位(SEP)组成,被归类为从不贫穷,向上移动,向下移动,总是很差。结果是当参与者在31岁时接受检查时,由于龋齿而丢失的至少一颗牙齿的患病率。效果调节剂是种族(黑人/布朗与白人)。对数二项回归模型用于估计粗和性别调整后的患病率(PR),并确定其相关性是否随种族而变化。使用加法量表测试统计相互作用。
    结果:任何牙齿脱落的患病率为50.8%(n=274)。在社会流动群体中,在从不贫穷的人群中,至少有一颗牙齿脱落的患病率,黑人/布朗(68.2%)比白人(37.4%)高出约31%.在种族和社会流动性之间的相互作用中发现了拮抗性发现(SinergyIndex=0.48;95%CI0.24,0.99;由于相互作用而导致的相对超额风险=-1.38;95%CI-2.34,-0.42),表明所观察到的种族和社会流动性对牙齿脱落的联合影响低于这些因素的预期总和。对于那些一生中总是贫穷的人来说,黑人/布朗人的估计较小,相对于他们的白人同行。
    结论:研究结果表明,向下移动的SEP组和黑人/布朗人群中至少有一颗牙齿脱落的患病率更高。在从未经历过贫困的黑人/布朗人中发现了更大的种族不平等,与黑人/布朗人相比,至少有一颗牙齿脱落的患病率更高。
    OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between social mobility and tooth loss in adults from the 1982 Pelotas Birth Cohort Study and whether race modifies this association.
    METHODS: The Oral Health Study used data from 541 individuals who were followed up to 31 years of age. Social mobility, composed of the participants\' socioeconomic position (SEP) at birth and at age 30, was categorized as never poor, upwardly mobile, downwardly mobile and always poor. The outcome was the prevalence of at least one tooth lost due to dental caries when the participants were examined at 31 years of age. The effect modifier was race (Black/Brown versus white people). Log-binomial regression models were used to estimate crude and sex-adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) and to determine whether the association varied with race. Statistical interactions were tested using an additive scale.
    RESULTS: The prevalence of any tooth loss was 50.8% (n = 274). In social mobility groups, the prevalence of at least one tooth lost in the never-poor group was about 31% points higher for Black/Brown (68.2%) than for white people (37.4%). Antagonistic findings were found for the interaction between race and social mobility (Sinergy Index = 0.48; 95% CI 0.24, 0.99; and relative excess of risk due to the interaction = -1.38; 95% CI -2.34, -0.42), suggesting that the observed joint effect of race and social mobility on tooth loss was lower than the expected sum of these factors. The estimates for Black/Brown people were smaller for those who were always poor during their lives, relative to their white counterparts.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest a higher prevalence of at least one tooth lost among people in the downward mobile SEP group and Black/Brown people. Greater racial inequity was found among Black/Brown people who had never experienced episodes of poverty, with Black/Brown people having a greater prevalence of at least one tooth lost than their white counterparts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:远程血压(BP)监测是否可以减少妊娠期和产后血压测量中的种族差异尚不清楚。这项研究评估了参加互联产妇在线监测(CMOM)计划的黑人和白人患者是否显示出BP确定和间隔时间的改善。方法:使用电子健康记录数据,将2016年1月至2022年9月期间纳入CMOM的3,976名孕妇患者的回顾性队列与匹配的常规护理患者进行比较。主要结果是妊娠和产后期间的BP确定(BP测量次数)和BP间隔(BP测量之间的时间)。还评估了妊娠高血压疾病患者在分娩后7天内检查BP的比例。结果:黑人患者的CMOM入学率低于白人患者(42.1%vs54.7%,P<0.0001)。CMOM组的患者在怀孕期间(比率=1.78,95%CI1.74-1.82)和产后期间(比率=1.30,95%CI1.23-1.37)的BP测量值高于常规护理组的患者,与常规治疗的患者相比,CMOM中的黑人和白人患者均有显着改善。CMOM干预并未使Black患者(风险比=1.03,95%CI0.94-1.11)和White患者(风险比=1.09,95%CI1.01-1.17)的产后7天依从性得到改善。结论:远程BP监测计划是提高所有患者产前和产后期间BP测量频率并缩短测量间隔的有用工具。需要进行未来的评估,以确定向黑人患者提供该计划和招募黑人患者的障碍。
    Background: Whether remote blood pressure (BP) monitoring can decrease racial disparities in BP measurement during pregnancy and the postpartum period remains unclear. This study evaluated whether Black and White patients enrolled in the Connected Maternity Online Monitoring (CMOM) program showed improvements in BP ascertainment and interval. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 3,976 pregnant patients enrolled in CMOM were compared to matched usual care patients between January 2016 and September 2022 using electronic health record data. The primary outcomes were BP ascertainment (number of BP measurements) and BP interval (time between BP measurements) during pregnancy and the postpartum period. The proportion of patients with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy who checked their BP within 7 days of discharge following delivery was also assessed. Results: Enrollment in CMOM was lower among Black patients than White patients (42.1% vs 54.7%, P<0.0001). Patients in the CMOM group had more BP measurements than patients in the usual care group during pregnancy (rate ratio=1.78, 95% CI 1.74-1.82) and the postpartum period (rate ratio=1.30, 95% CI 1.23-1.37), with significant improvements for both Black and White patients enrolled in CMOM compared to patients in usual care. The CMOM intervention did not result in an improvement in 7-day postpartum adherence to checking BP for Black patients (risk ratio=1.03, 95% CI 0.94-1.11) as it did for White patients (risk ratio=1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.17). Conclusion: Remote BP monitoring programs are a helpful tool to improve the frequency of BP measurements and shorten intervals between measurements during the prenatal and postpartum periods for all patients. Future evaluation is needed to determine the barriers to offering the program to and enrolling Black patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:了解种族如何影响A1c和血糖之间的关联可以改善糖尿病筛查。我们试图确定,对于给定的A1c水平,口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)期间的葡萄糖水平因种族而异。
    方法:从22个美国临床站点收集的数据中,我们进行了一项横断面研究,包括同时测量的A1c和OGTT,以及对高危糖尿病前期亚组的观察性纵向随访.使用数值积分方法计算OGTT期间的血糖曲线下面积(AUCglu)和最小二乘回归模型来估计按种族给定AUCglu的A1c,控制潜在的混杂因素。
    结果:1016黑色,2658白色,有糖尿病风险的193名亚洲人被纳入横断面分析.其中,2154名高风险糖尿病前期患者随访2.5年。对于给定的A1c水平,黑人和白人参与者的AUCglu较低。在调整了潜在的混杂因素后,与白人参与者相比,黑人和亚洲人的A1c水平分别高出0.15-0.20和0.02-0.19个百分点,分别为(p<0.05)。在纵向分析中,黑人参与者比白人参与者更有可能被A1c诊断为糖尿病(28%vs10%,分别为;p<0.01)。与白人参与者相比,黑人和亚洲参与者被空腹血糖诊断的可能性较小(16%vs15%vs37%,分别为;p<0.05)。与白人参与者相比,A1c水平处于较低水平五分位数的黑人参与者随着时间的推移A1c的增加更大。
    结论:使用A1c以外的额外检测来筛查糖尿病可能更好地对不同美国人群的糖尿病风险进行分层。
    BACKGROUND: Understanding how race may influence the association between A1c and glycemia can improve diabetes screening. We sought to determine whether, for a given A1c level, glucose levels during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) differed by race.
    METHODS: From data collected at 22 US clinical sites, we conducted a cross-sectional study of concurrently measured A1c and OGTT and observational longitudinal follow-up of the subset with high-risk pre-diabetes. Numerical integration methods were used to calculate area under the glycemic curve (AUCglu) during OGTT and least squares regression model to estimate A1c for a given AUCglu by race, controlling for potential confounders.
    RESULTS: 1016 black, 2658 white, and 193 Asian persons at risk of diabetes were included in cross-sectional analysis. Of these, 2154 with high-risk pre-diabetes were followed for 2.5 years. For a given A1c level, AUCglu was lower in black versus white participants. After adjustment for potential confounders, A1c levels for a given AUCglu quintile were 0.15-0.20 and 0.02-0.19 percentage points higher in black and Asian compared with white participants, respectively (p<0.05). In longitudinal analyses, black participants were more likely to be diagnosed with diabetes by A1c than white participants (28% vs 10%, respectively; p<0.01). Black and Asian participants were less likely to be diagnosed by fasting glucose than white participants (16% vs 15% vs 37%, respectively; p<0.05). Black participants with A1c levels in the lower-level quintiles had greater increase in A1c over time compared with white participants.
    CONCLUSIONS: Use of additional testing beyond A1c to screen for diabetes may better stratify diabetes risk in the diverse US population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:分析哥德堡-2研究结果在北美队列中的普遍性。
    方法:我们在亨利·福特健康(HFH)队列中复制了哥德堡-2纳入标准,通过识别2013年至2018年进行PSA测试的所有50-60岁患者。研究期内的第一个PSA在进入时被认为是PSA,并包括在分析中。卡方检验用于比较哥德堡-2和HFH队列之间的分类变量,特别关注黑人,他们也被单独分析。
    结果:纳入队列的HFH患者为49456例,其中8562例为黑人。在整个HFH队列中的患者中,HFH黑色队列,哥德堡参考队列,和哥德堡实验队列,PSA≥3ng/mL的比率为,分别,6.8%,10.2%,6.8%,和6.6%。活检率是,分别,1.8%,4.1%,5.8%,和2.5%。PCa被发现,分别,1.4%,3.0%,2.3%,和1.5%;格里森评分3+3英寸,分别,0.5%,0.8%,1.2%,和0.6%;格里森得分>3+3英寸,分别,0.9%,2.2%,1.1%,和0.9%。
    结论:我们的队列与哥德堡队列相比,活检率更低,非csPCa诊断的发生率更低,同时仍然保持相同的csPCa发病率。这意味着减少非csPCa诊断的好处,正如在哥德堡实验队列中观察到的那样,在美国“现实世界的实践”患者中不一定可以复制。同样值得注意的是,我们的黑人比例明显更高,表现出更具侵略性的疾病。
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze the generalizability of the Göteborg-2 findings to a North American cohort.
    METHODS: We replicated the Göteborg-2 inclusion criteria in our Henry Ford Health (HFH) cohort, by identifying all patients 50-60 years old who had a PSA test from 2013 to 2018. The first PSA within the study period was considered PSA at entry, and included in the analysis. Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables between the Göteborg-2 and HFH cohort, with a particular focus on Black men, who were also analyzed separately.
    RESULTS: The HFH patients included in the cohort were 49 456, of which 8562 were Black. In patients within the entire HFH cohort, HFH Black cohort, Göteborg Reference cohort, and Göteborg Experimental cohort, the rate of PSA ≥3 ng/mL was, respectively, 6.8%, 10.2%, 6.8%, and 6.6%. The rate of biopsy performed was, respectively, 1.8%, 4.1%, 5.8%, and 2.5%. PCa was found in, respectively, 1.4%, 3.0%, 2.3%, and 1.5%; Gleason score 3 + 3 in, respectively, 0.5%, 0.8%, 1.2%, and 0.6%; Gleason score > 3 + 3 in, respectively, 0.9%, 2.2%, 1.1%, and 0.9%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our cohort had a lower biopsy rate and a lower incidence of non-csPCa diagnosis than both Göteborg cohorts, while still maintaining the same incidence of csPCa. This implies that the benefits of reducing non-csPCa diagnosis, as observed in the Experimental Göteborg cohort, are not necessarily replicable in U.S. \"real-world practice\" patients. Also noteworthy, we had a significantly higher percentage of Black men, who showed more aggressive disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心力衰竭(HF)影响>600万美国成年人,随着最近HF住院人数的增加。我们的目的是调查社区劣势与突发HF事件之间的关联以及糖尿病状态的潜在差异。
    我们纳入了来自REGARDS研究(中风的地理和种族差异的原因)的23645名参与者,美国大陆≥45岁黑人和白人成年人的前瞻性队列(基线2005-2007).使用6个人口普查范围变量(2000年美国人口普查)的Z评分评估邻里劣势,并归类为四分位数。截至2017年,已裁定发生HF住院治疗或HF相关死亡。多变量调整后的Cox回归用于检查邻域劣势与突发HF之间的关联。使用相互作用术语评估糖尿病的异质性。
    平均年龄为64.4岁,39.5%是黑人成年人,54.9%女性,18.8%患有糖尿病。在10.7年的中位随访中,有1125例HF事件,发生率为3.3(四分位数1),4.7(四分位数2),5.2(四分位数3),和6.0(四分位数4)每1000人年。与生活在最有利社区(四分位数1)的成年人相比,居住在四分位数2、3和4(最不利)的社区中的人有1.30(95%CI,1.06-1.60),1.36(95%CI,1.11-1.66),和1.45倍(95%CI,1.18-1.79),即使在考虑已知的混杂因素后,发生HF的风险也要大。这种关联在糖尿病状态之间没有显着差异(相互作用P=0.59)。对于患有糖尿病的成年人,与四分位数4和四分位数1相比,调整后的HF风险为1.34(95%CI,0.92-1.96),无糖尿病的成人为1.50(95%CI,1.16-1.94).
    在这个大型同期前瞻性队列中,邻里劣势与HF事件的风险增加相关.HF风险的增加与糖尿病状态没有区别。解决社会问题,经济,和结构因素在邻域水平可能影响HF预防。
    Heart failure (HF) affects >6 million US adults, with recent increases in HF hospitalizations. We aimed to investigate the association between neighborhood disadvantage and incident HF events and potential differences by diabetes status.
    We included 23 645 participants from the REGARDS study (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke), a prospective cohort of Black and White adults aged ≥45 years living in the continental United States (baseline 2005-2007). Neighborhood disadvantage was assessed using a Z score of 6 census tract variables (2000 US Census) and categorized as quartiles. Incident HF hospitalizations or HF-related deaths through 2017 were adjudicated. Multivariable-adjusted Cox regression was used to examine the association between neighborhood disadvantage and incident HF. Heterogeneity by diabetes was assessed using an interaction term.
    The mean age was 64.4 years, 39.5% were Black adults, 54.9% females, and 18.8% had diabetes. During a median follow-up of 10.7 years, there were 1125 incident HF events with an incidence rate of 3.3 (quartile 1), 4.7 (quartile 2), 5.2 (quartile 3), and 6.0 (quartile 4) per 1000 person-years. Compared to adults living in the most advantaged neighborhoods (quartile 1), those living in neighborhoods in quartiles 2, 3, and 4 (most disadvantaged) had 1.30 (95% CI, 1.06-1.60), 1.36 (95% CI, 1.11-1.66), and 1.45 (95% CI, 1.18-1.79) times greater hazard of incident HF even after accounting for known confounders. This association did not significantly differ by diabetes status (interaction P=0.59). For adults with diabetes, the adjusted incident HF hazards comparing those in quartile 4 versus quartile 1 was 1.34 (95% CI, 0.92-1.96), and it was 1.50 (95% CI, 1.16-1.94) for adults without diabetes.
    In this large contemporaneous prospective cohort, neighborhood disadvantage was associated with an increased risk of incident HF events. This increase in HF risk did not differ by diabetes status. Addressing social, economic, and structural factors at the neighborhood level may impact HF prevention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:超声心动图研究表明,南亚人的心室容积较小,比白人欧洲人更低的质量和更同心的重塑,但是没有使用心脏MRI(CMR)的数据。我们旨在比较欧洲白人和南亚人群的CMR量化心脏结构和功能。
    方法:英国生物库成像CMR子研究中的健康白人欧洲和南亚参与者通过排除有心血管疾病史的人进行鉴定,高血压,肥胖或糖尿病。种族按年龄和性别匹配。心脏容量,质量和特征跟踪应变进行了比较。
    结果:121对匹配(77男/44女,包括平均年龄58±8岁)的南亚和欧洲白人参与者。南亚男性和女性的左心室(LV)绝对容积较小,但没有指数,和较小的绝对和指数右心室容积,与欧洲白人参与者相比,具有较低的绝对和指数LV质量和较低的LV质量:体积。尽管心室或心房射血分数没有差异,南亚女性的LV全球纵向应变高于欧洲白人女性,而不是男性,男性和南亚女性的全球圆周应变均高于欧洲白人女性。南亚男性与欧洲白人男性的早期舒张应变率峰值较高,但南亚和欧洲白人女性没有什么不同。
    结论:与超声心动图研究相反,与欧洲白人受试者相比,英国生物银行研究的南亚参与者的同心重塑较少,全球圆周应变较高。这些发现强调了性别和种族特异性正常范围对心脏容积和功能的重要性。
    BACKGROUND: Echocardiographic studies indicate South Asian people have smaller ventricular volumes, lower mass and more concentric remodelling than White European people, but there are no data using cardiac MRI (CMR). We aimed to compare CMR quantified cardiac structure and function in White European and South Asian people.
    METHODS: Healthy White European and South Asian participants in the UK Biobank Imaging CMR sub-study were identified by excluding those with a history of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, obesity or diabetes. Ethnic groups were matched by age and sex. Cardiac volumes, mass and feature tracking strain were compared.
    RESULTS: 121 matched pairs (77 male/44 female, mean age 58 ± 8 years) of South Asian and White European participants were included. South Asian males and females had smaller absolute but not indexed left ventricular (LV) volumes, and smaller absolute and indexed right ventricular volumes, with lower absolute and indexed LV mass and lower LV mass:volume than White European participants. Although there were no differences in ventricular or atrial ejection fractions, LV global longitudinal strain was higher in South Asian females than White European females but not males, and global circumferential strain was higher in both male and South Asian females than White European females. Peak early diastolic strain rates were higher in South Asian versus White European males, but not different between South Asian and White European females.
    CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to echocardiographic studies, South Asian participants in the UK Biobank study had less concentric remodelling and higher global circumferential strain than White European subjects. These findings emphasise the importance of sex- and ethnic- specific normal ranges for cardiac volumes and function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:跟踪测试B部分(TMT-B)评估执行功能,记忆,和感觉运动功能。以前没有研究发现APOE-ε4基因型对阿尔茨海默病(AD)中TMT-B评分的纵向影响。
    方法:这项研究使用了阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议(ADNI)的数据:382名患有AD的参与者,503与认知正常(CN),1293例轻度认知障碍(MCI)在基线和随访四年。多变量线性混合模型用于研究APOE-ε4基因型对TMT-B评分变化的影响。
    结果:与白人相比,非洲裔美国人(AA)和西班牙裔美国人的TMT-B得分较高(认知功能较差)。此外,在基线和四次随访时,与没有APOE-ε4等位基因的个体相比,具有1或2个APOE-ε4等位基因的白人受试者的TMT-B得分明显更高;然而,在西班牙裔和AA组中,APOE-ε4等位基因之间的TMT-B没有发现差异。在3个种族群体中未发现通过访问互动的APOE-ε4。按AD诊断分层,APOE-ε4等位基因仅在MCI组中与TMT-B评分相关,虽然教育访问有重要的互动,APOE-ε4等位基因,MCI组的简易精神状态检查(MMSE)评分。此外,TMT-B与MMSE显著相关,AD评估量表-认知子量表13(ADAS13),ttau,pTau,Aβ42和海马。
    结论:APOE-13C4等位基因与白人受试者的TMT-B评分相关,但不是在西班牙裔和AA组。APOE-ε4在MCI组中显示与访问的相互作用。
    OBJECTIVE: The trail making test part B (TMT-B) evaluates executive functions, memory, and sensorimotor functions. No previous study was found to examine the longitudinal effect of APOE-ε4 genotypes on the TMT-B scores in Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) across racial groups.
    METHODS: This study used the data from Alzheimer\'s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): 382 participants with AD, 503 with cognitive normal (CN), 1293 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) at baseline and follow-up of four years. The multivariable linear mixed model was used to investigate the effect of APOE-ε4 genotypes on changes in TMT-B scores.
    RESULTS: Compared with Whites, African Americans (AA) and Hispanics had higher TMT-B scores (poor cognitive function). Furthermore, Whites subjects with 1 or 2 APOE-ε4 alleles had significantly higher TMT-B scores compared with individuals without APOE-ε4 allele at baseline and four follow-up visits; however, no differences in TMT-B were found between APOE-ε4 alleles in the Hispanic and AA groups. No APOE-ε4 by visit interactions was found for 3 racial groups. Stratified by AD diagnosis, the APOE-ε4 allele was associated with TMT-B scores only in the MCI group, while there were significant interactions for visit by education, APOE-ε4 allele, and the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score in the MCI group. In addition, TMT-B was significantly correlated with the MMSE, AD Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale 13 (ADAS13), tTau, pTau, Aβ42, and hippocampus.
    CONCLUSIONS: APOE-ɛ4 allele is associated with TMT-B scores in Whites subjects, but not in the Hispanic and AA groups. APOE-ε4 showed interaction with visit in the MCI group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    目的:研究一致表明,非洲裔美国人对行为干预的反应体重减轻,但是导致这一结果的机制尚未得到充分研究。
    方法:数据来自路易斯安那州初级CarE(PROPEL)研究的成功减肥,这是一个集群随机的,在初级保健诊所进行的双臂试验.在PROPEL审判中,24个月后,与属于其他种族的患者相比,非洲裔美国人的体重减轻更少。在目前的研究中,我们对PROPEL干预组的445例患者进行了反事实中介分析,以确定哪些变量介导了种族与体重减轻之间的关系.调解员包括治疗参与,社会心理,和生活方式因素。
    结果:在6个月时,每日体重介导了33%(p=0.008)的体重减轻种族差异.24个月时,会议出勤率和每日体重介导了35%(p=0.027)和66%(p=0.005)的减肥种族差异,分别。社会心理或生活方式变量均未介导种族体重减轻的关联。
    结论:专门针对参与的策略,例如改善会议出勤率和自我权衡行为,在非洲裔美国人中,需要在延长的时间段内支持更公平的减肥。
    OBJECTIVE: Studies have consistently shown that African American individuals lose less weight in response to behavioral interventions, but the mechanisms leading to this result have been understudied.
    METHODS: Data were derived from the PROmoting Successful Weight Loss in Primary CarE in Louisiana (PROPEL) study, which was a cluster-randomized, two-arm trial conducted in primary care clinics. In the PROPEL trial, African American individuals lost less weight compared with patients who belonged to other racial groups after 24 months. In the current study, counterfactual mediation analyses among 445 patients in the intervention arm of PROPEL were used to determine which variables mediated the relationship between race and weight loss. The mediators included treatment engagement, psychosocial, and lifestyle factors.
    RESULTS: At 6 months, daily weighing mediated 33% (p = 0.008) of the racial differences in weight loss. At 24 months, session attendance and daily weighing mediated 35% (p = 0.027) and 66% (p = 0.005) of the racial differences in weight loss, respectively. None of the psychosocial or lifestyle variables mediated the race-weight loss association.
    CONCLUSIONS: Strategies specifically targeting engagement, such as improving session attendance and self-weighing behaviors, among African American individuals are needed to support more equitable weight losses over extended time periods.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:虽然一些减肥手术的结果因种族/民族而异,关于手术后失控(LOC)饮食和社会心理结局的种族/民族差异的了解较少.
    目的:这项前瞻性研究通过24个月的随访,对减肥手术后LOC饮食和体重减轻的种族差异进行了初步的短期研究,并将其扩展到长期结果。
    方法:美国学术医学中心。
    方法:在3个月的随机分组中,参与者为140名患者(46.4%非白人),在减肥手术后约6个月进行LOC饮食的对照试验。在治疗结束后6、12、18和24个月(手术后约33个月)重新评估参与者。博士评估人员进行了饮食失调检查-减肥手术版访谈,以评估12个月和24个月随访时的LOC饮食和饮食失调心理病理学。重复贝克抑郁量表II,并在所有随访中获得测量的体重。
    结果:在所有随访中,白种人患者比非白种人患者的体重减少百分比显著更高(p<.03)。白人患者在12-(p=.004)和24个月(p=.024)随访时报告的LOC饮食显着增加,在12个月随访时(p<.028),进食障碍精神病理学显着增加。在24个月的随访中,种族组在进食障碍心理病理学方面或在任何随访中的贝克抑郁量表II抑郁评分均无显着差异。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,在减肥手术后进食LOC的患者中,非白人患者比白人患者获得更低的超重损失百分比,但在LOC饮食方面具有可比或更好的结果,相关的进食障碍精神病理学,随着时间的推移,抑郁症。
    BACKGROUND: While some bariatric surgery outcomes vary by race/ethnicity, less is known about racial/ethnic differences in loss-of-control (LOC) eating and psychosocial outcomes post-surgery.
    OBJECTIVE: This prospective study examined and extended initial short-term findings regarding racial differences in post-bariatric surgery LOC eating and weight loss to longer-term outcomes through 24-month follow-ups.
    METHODS: Academic medical center in the United States.
    METHODS: Participants were 140 patients (46.4% non-White) in a 3-month randomized, controlled trial for LOC eating performed about 6 months after bariatric surgery. Participants were reassessed at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment ended (about 33 mo after surgery). Doctoral assessors administered the Eating Disorder Examination-Bariatric Surgery Version interview to assess LOC eating and eating-disorder psychopathology at 12- and 24-month follow-ups. The Beck Depression Inventory II was repeated, and measured weight was obtained at all follow-ups.
    RESULTS: White patients had significantly greater percent excess weight loss at all follow-ups than non-White patients (p < .03). White patients reported significantly more LOC eating at 12- (p = .004) and 24-month (p = .024) follow-ups and significantly greater eating disorder psychopathology at 12-month follow-up (p < .028). Racial groups did not differ significantly in eating disorder psychopathology at 24-month follow-ups or in Beck Depression Inventory II depression scores at any follow-ups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that among patients with LOC eating after bariatric surgery, non-White patients attain a lower percent excess weight loss than White patients but have comparable or better outcomes in LOC eating, associated eating disorder psychopathology, and depression over time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号