背景:患有遗传性视网膜母细胞瘤(RB)的幸存者在其子女中面临第二原发癌和RB的高风险。遗传知识可以支持第二次癌症监测,传达生殖选择或早期诊断的RB在他们的后代。目前,所有新诊断的丹麦RB患者都接受基因检测,与在可用DNA测试之前被诊断出的少数幸存者相反。
目的:为了检查RB幸存者对未经请求的接触的反应,基因检测的吸收,和RB1变异检出率,并定性评估可遗传RB基因检测的经验和总体影响。
方法:邀请未经遗传测试的成年RB幸存者接受遗传咨询,进行遗传RB的基因检测并完成眼科检查。响应的数量,对基因检测的摄取和遗传结果进行描述性报道。此外,有反应的幸存者参与了一项关于基因检测感知影响的定性访谈研究.采访是录音的,逐字转录和主题分析。
结果:在受邀的RB幸存者中,58%的人回答。其中,88%的人选择了遗传咨询和基因检测。在23%的RB幸存者中确定了可遗传RB的诊断。有趣的是,所有这些幸存者都受到了单方面的影响。对访谈数据的分析揭示了三个反复出现的主题,这些主题涉及遗传咨询和测试在初步诊断后几年的影响:“什么风险?”\'知识很重要\'和\'结果的影响\'。对一些参与者来说,他们的孩子可能患第二癌症和RB的风险是新知识;然而,总的来说,参与者对收到遗传信息和遗传确定性表示赞赏。因此,遗传咨询和检测的影响被认为是积极的。
结论:总体而言,RB幸存者重视接受遗传咨询的机会,并在诊断后多年接受基因检测。回应RB幸存者感谢测试邀请,感到消息灵通,并在决策方面描述了很少的决策冲突,重视遗传信息和确定性。在之前未经测试的RB幸存者中,有23%的人确认了可遗传的RB。这些人强调了了解和积极应对生殖和癌症风险的价值。
BACKGROUND: Survivors with heritable retinoblastoma (RB) face a high risk for second primary cancer and RB in their children. Knowledge of heredity can support second cancer surveillance, convey reproductive options or early diagnosis of RB in their offspring. Currently, all newly diagnosed Danish patients with RB are offered genetic testing, as opposed to a minority of survivors diagnosed before available DNA testing.
OBJECTIVE: To examine RB survivors\' response to unsolicited contact, uptake of genetic testing, and
RB1 variant detection rate, and to qualitatively evaluate the experience and overall impact of genetic testing for heritable RB.
METHODS: Genetically untested adult RB survivors were invited to receive genetic counseling, undergo genetic testing for heritable RB and complete an eye examination. The number of responses, uptake of genetic testing and genetic results are descriptively reported. Additionally, responding survivors participated in a qualitative interview
study of the perceived impact of genetic testing. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed.
RESULTS: Among invited RB survivors, 58% responded. Of these, 88% opted for genetic counseling and genetic testing. A diagnosis of heritable RB was established in 23% of RB survivors. Interestingly, all of these survivors were unilaterally affected. Analysis of data from the interviews revealed three recurring themes regarding the impact of genetic counseling and testing several years after initial diagnosis: \'Risk of what?\', \'Knowledge is important\' and \'Impact of the result\'. The possible risk ofsecond cancer and RB in their children was new knowledge for several participants; however, in general, the participants appreciated receiving genetic information and certainty about heredity. Accordingly, the impact of genetic counseling and testing was perceived in a positive way.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, RB survivors valued the opportunity to receive genetic counseling and undergo genetic testing many years after diagnosis. Responding RB survivors appreciated the invitation to test, felt well-informed and described little decisional conflict regarding their decision-making, valuing the genetic information and certainty. Heritable RB was confirmed in 23% of the previously untested RB survivors. These individuals emphasized the value of knowing and being proactive regarding both reproduction and cancer risk.