目的:本研究的目的是确定可用的中医报告指南,描绘它们的基本特征,评估其发展过程的科学严谨性,并评估其传播。
方法:在Medline(通过PubMed)进行了搜索,中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),SinoMed,万方数据,和EQUATOR网络以确定中医报告指南。使用预先准备的Excel数据库来提取有关基本特征的信息,发展过程,和传播信息。中医报告指南的开发过程质量是通过评估其对健康研究报告指南(GDHRRG)开发人员指南的依从性来评估的。通过审查收到的引用次数,分析了这些准则的传播程度。
结果:从20种学术期刊中获得了26种中医报告指南,其中61.5%发表在英文期刊上。在准则中,14人(53.8%)在EQUATOR网络中注册。平均而言,GDHRRG指南的依从率为63.3%,范围为22.2%~94.4%.三个步骤显示合规性差,即准则认可(23.1%),翻译指南(19.2%),并制定出版策略(19.2%)。此外,在英文期刊上发表的GDHRRG指南的依从率高于中文期刊。在传播方面,15.4%的指南被引用超过100次,而73.1%的人被引用不到50次。
结论:中医报告指南的发展在科学严谨和后续传播方面仍然存在局限性。因此,必须确保在制定中医报告指南时坚持科学程序,加强宣传,传播,和执行。
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to identify available reporting
guidelines for traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), delineate their fundamental characteristics, assess the scientific rigor of their development process, and evaluate their dissemination.
METHODS: A search was conducted in Medline (via
PubMed), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), SinoMed, WANFANG DATA, and the EQUATOR Network to identify TCM reporting guidelines. A preprepared Excel database was used to extract information on the basic characteristics, development process, and dissemination information. The development process quality of TCM reporting guidelines was assessed by evaluating their compliance with the Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting
Guidelines (GDHRRG). The extent of dissemination of these guidelines was analyzed by examining the number of citations received.
RESULTS: A total of 26 reporting guidelines for TCM were obtained from 20 academic journals, with 61.5% of them published in English journals. Among the
guidelines, 14 (53.8%) were registered in the EQUATOR Network. On average, the compliance rate of GDHRRG guidelines was reported to be 63.3% ranging from 22.2% to 94.4%. Three steps showed poor compliance, namely
guideline endorsement (23.1%), translated
guidelines (19.2%), and developing a publication strategy (19.2%). Furthermore, the compliance rate of GDHRRG guidelines published in English journals was higher than that in Chinese journals. In terms of the dissemination, 15.4% of the guidelines had been cited over 100 times, while 73.1% had been cited less than 50 times.
CONCLUSIONS: The development of TCM reporting guidelines still has limitations in terms of regarding scientific rigor and follow-up dissemination. Therefore, it is important to ensure adherence to the scientific process in the development of TCM reporting guidelines and to strengthen their promotion, dissemination, and implementation.