Psychiatric

精神病
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与精神疾病的出生季节关联指向环境(共同)病因因素,例如自然光周期,如果澄清,可以进行预防干预。我们系统地回顾了有关出生季节,双相情感障碍和抑郁症的文献,并在UKBiobank数据库的横断面分析中探讨了围产期自然光周期与这些结果之间的关联。我们使用了妊娠晚期的平均日光周期和相对光周期范围(相对于平均值),分开,在出生后的前3个月作为指标。从审查来看,晚春分娩的抑郁症风险增加与可能的单发发作的几率增加是一致的,可能复发-,和诊断出的抑郁症(分别为OR2.8595CI1.6-5.08,OR2.2095CI1.57-3.1和OR1.4895CI1.11-1.97),对于经历相对非极端每日光周期的参与者,妊娠晚期相对光周期范围增加。在英国生物银行中,双相情感障碍与冬春分娩的风险与围产期光周期指标与双相情感障碍的关联没有一致的模式形成对比。由于自然光周期随时间和纬度而变化,围产期自然光周期(以及通过昼夜节律定时系统和/或与背中缝核相关的5-羟色胺能回路的假设作用机制)可能会调和出生季节关联中的不一致。需要进一步的研究。
    Season-of-birth associations with psychiatric disorders point to environmental (co-)aetiological factors such as natural photoperiod that, if clarified, may allow interventions toward prevention. We systematically reviewed the literature concerning season-of-birth and bipolar disorder and depression and explored associations between the perinatal natural photoperiod and these outcomes in a cross-sectional analysis of the UK Biobank database. We used mean daily photoperiod and relative photoperiod range (relative to the mean) in the 3rd trimester and, separately, in the first 3 months post birth as metrics. From review, increased risk of depression with late spring birth is compatible with increased odds of probable single episode-, probable recurrent-, and diagnosed depression (OR 2.85 95 %CI 1.6-5.08, OR 2.20 95 %CI 1.57-3.1, and OR 1.48 95 %CI 1.11-1.97, respectively) with increasing 3rd trimester relative photoperiod range for participants who experienced relatively non-extreme daily photoperiods. Risk of bipolar disorder with winter-spring birth contrasted with no consistent patterns of perinatal photoperiod metric associations with bipolar disorder in the UK Biobank. As natural photoperiod varies by both time-of-year and latitude, perinatal natural photoperiods (and a hypothesized mechanism of action via the circadian timing system and/or serotonergic circuitry associated with the dorsal raphe nucleus) may reconcile inconsistencies in season-of-birth associations. Further studies are warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:侵略和暴力是急诊部门(ED)的主要问题,并对患者和工作人员的健康和安全产生负面影响。很少有经过验证的工具来识别有躁动风险的患者。本研究进行了系统的文献综述,以确定和总结预测ED攻击行为的得分。
    方法:搜索内容包括1月1日之间发表的文章,1987年和12月31日,2022年,使用术语“aggress*”,\"\"暴力*,\"\"紧急情况,“\”急性,\"\"得分,“或”刻度。\"
    结果:发现十个分数是相关的,开发的分数中有8个用于ED。攻击行为风险评估工具(ABRAT)被发现是敏感的(84.3%)和特定的(95.3%)。Brøset暴力清单(BVC)具有高度特异性(99.4%),而暴力筛查清单(VSC)的敏感性较低(57.2%)和特异性较低(45.7%)。发现暴力和侵略(OVA)/BVC清单显着减少了安全呼叫激活的数量(P<0.001)。行为活动评定量表(BARS)和OVA/BVC评分最短,有七个和六个项目,分别。
    结论:OVA/BVC检查表是预测和预防ED暴力的有价值的工具。未来的前瞻性研究应该调查其有效性。
    BACKGROUND: Aggression and violence are major concerns in emergency departments (EDs), and have negative consequences for patient and staff health and safety. Few validated tools exist for identifying patients at risk of agitation. This study conducted a systematic literature review to identify and summarize the scores that predict aggressive behavior in EDs.
    METHODS: The search included articles published between Jan 1st, 1987, and Dec 31st, 2022, using the terms \"aggress*,\" \"violent*,\" \"emergency,\" \"acute,\" \"score,\" or \"scale.\"
    RESULTS: Ten scores were found to be relevant, with eight of the developed scores intended for use in EDs. The Aggressive Behavior Risk Assessment Tool (ABRAT) was found to be sensitive (84.3%) and specific (95.3%). The Brøset Violence Checklist (BVC) was highly specific (99.4%), whereas the Violence Screening Checklist (VSC) was less sensitive (57.2%) and specific (45.7%). The violence and aggression (OVA)/BVC checklist was found to significantly decrease the number of security call activations (P < 0.001). The Behavioral Activity Rating Scale (BARS) and OVA/BVC scores were the shortest, with seven and six items, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: The OVA/BVC checklist is a valuable tool for predicting and preventing violence in the EDs. Future prospective studies should investigate its effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:社交焦虑障碍(SAD)是一种影响职业和社会功能的使人衰弱的精神障碍。虚拟现实(VR)疗法可以为SAD患者提供有效的治疗。然而,随着沉浸式VR技术的快速创新,需要更现代的研究来检查有效性和伴随的用户体验结果(即,安全,可用性,可接受性,和减员)对SAD的新兴VR干预措施。
    目的:本系统评价的目的是研究当代VR干预在SAD患者中的有效性和用户体验。
    方法:Cochrane图书馆,Emcare,PsycINFO,PubMed,ScienceDirect,Scopus,和WebofScience数据库在2012年1月1日至2022年4月26日之间进行了搜索。基于标题和摘要信息筛选去重复的搜索结果。对71篇文章进行了全文审查。如果他们评估了SAD患者中任何沉浸式VR干预的有效性和用户体验结果,则包括所有设计和比较组的研究。使用标准化的编码表来提取关键参与者的数据,干预,比较器,结果,和研究设计项目。
    结果:使用叙述性综合对研究结果进行列表和讨论。共有18项研究符合纳入标准。
    结论:研究结果表明,基于VR暴露疗法的干预措施通常可以提供有效的,安全,可用,和可接受的治疗成人SAD。VR治疗的平均流失率很低(11.36%),尽管一些报告的用户体验困难,包括潜在的模拟器疾病,基于暴露的情绪困扰,以及在同步组设置中管理治疗的问题。这篇综述还揭示了一些研究空白,包括缺乏对SAD儿童和青少年的VR治疗研究,以及缺乏对VR用户体验互动的标准化评估。需要更多的研究来解决这些问题。
    背景:PROSPEROCRD42022353891;https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?RecordID=353891。
    BACKGROUND: Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is a debilitating psychiatric disorder that affects occupational and social functioning. Virtual reality (VR) therapies can provide effective treatment for people with SAD. However, with rapid innovations in immersive VR technology, more contemporary research is required to examine the effectiveness and concomitant user experience outcomes (ie, safety, usability, acceptability, and attrition) of emerging VR interventions for SAD.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness and user experience of contemporary VR interventions among people with SAD.
    METHODS: The Cochrane Library, Emcare, PsycINFO, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched between January 1, 2012, and April 26, 2022. Deduplicated search results were screened based on title and abstract information. Full-text examination was conducted on 71 articles. Studies of all designs and comparator groups were included if they appraised the effectiveness and user experience outcomes of any immersive VR intervention among people with SAD. A standardized coding sheet was used to extract data on key participant, intervention, comparator, outcome, and study design items.
    RESULTS: The findings were tabulated and discussed using a narrative synthesis. A total of 18 studies met the inclusion criteria.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings showed that VR exposure therapy-based interventions can generally provide effective, safe, usable, and acceptable treatments for adults with SAD. The average attrition rate from VR treatment was low (11.36%) despite some reported user experience difficulties, including potential simulator sickness, exposure-based emotional distress, and problems with managing treatment delivered in a synchronous group setting. This review also revealed several research gaps, including a lack of VR treatment studies on children and adolescents with SAD as well as a paucity of standardized assessments of VR user experience interactions. More studies are required to address these issues.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42022353891; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=353891.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肥大细胞增多表现为多系统症状,经常涉及神经系统。众多的认知,在多项观察性研究中已经报道了神经精神病学和神经学改变.
    方法:我们参考电子数据库Medline,Scopus,WebofScience,科克伦,和基地到2023年6月。
    结果:我们选择了24项研究,其中大多数研究表明,很大比例的肥大细胞增多症患者患有认知功能,神经精神病学和神经学改变。在成人中观察到的最常见的疾病和估计的频率范围是抑郁症(68%-75%)。焦虑,高压力或易怒(27%-54%),认知障碍(27%-39%,主要影响记忆技能),头痛(55%-69%)。据报道,儿童的注意力挑战和学习困难比例为13%,而神经发育障碍的发生率为8%-12%。尽管在该人群中很少进行神经影像学研究,但已报道了伴有心理认知症状的肥大细胞增多症患者中常见的白色异常。
    结论:为了更好地理解这些表现,应进行更全面和均匀的评估以及神经影像学和组织学分析的进一步研究。这些症状的早期检测和适当管理可以大大提高这些患者的生活质量。
    BACKGROUND: Mastocytosis manifests with multisystemic symptoms, often involving the nervous system. Numerous cognitive, neuropsychiatric and neurological alterations have been reported in multiple observational studies.
    METHODS: We performed a qualitative systematic literature review of reported data consulting the electronic databases Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and BASE until June 2023.
    RESULTS: We selected 24 studies in which the majority showed that a high proportion of mastocytosis patients suffer cognitive, neuropsychiatric and neurological alterations. The most common disorders and estimated ranges of frequency observed in adults were depression (68%-75%), anxiety, high stress or irritability (27%-54%), cognitive impairment (27%-39%, primarily affecting memory skills), and headaches (55%-69%). Attention challenges and learning difficulties were reported in children at a rate of 13%, while neurodevelopmental disorders occurred at rates of 8%-12%. Frequent white abnormalities in mastocytosis patients with concomitant psychocognitive symptoms have been reported although neuroimaging studies have been performed rarely in this population.
    CONCLUSIONS: Further studies with more comprehensive and homogeneous evaluations and neuroimaging and histological analysis should be performed for a better understanding of these manifestations. An earlier detection and proper management of these symptoms could greatly improve the quality of life of these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    医院治疗的自我伤害很常见,昂贵的,与自杀密切相关。虽然存在有效的社会心理干预措施,在医院治疗的自残事件发生后,哪些关键因素可能会改变将患者转诊至精神科住院和/或门诊治疗的临床决策,目前尚不清楚.
    我们搜索了五个电子数据库(CENTRAL,CDSR,MEDLINE,Embase,和PsycINFO),直至2023年1月3日,用于报告在发生医院治疗的自我伤害事件后接受转诊和/或出院接受精神病治疗和/或门诊治疗的患者比例和/或事件的数据。使用随机效应模型和R中的Freedman-Tukey双反正弦调整来计算集合加权患病率估计值,版本4.0.5。我们还使用随机效应元回归研究了几个研究水平和宏观水平的因素是否解释了这些结果的变异性。本综述的方案已在PROSPERO(CRD42021261531)预注册。
    189种出版物,代表131项独特的研究,该研究报告了243,953名参与者的数据,这些参与者参与了总共174,359次自我伤害发作.样本来自44个不同的国家。根据世界银行的分类,大多数(83.7%)样本来自高收入国家。在整个年龄范围内,四分之一的人被转介接受住院精神病治疗,其中,大约五分之一的人接受了治疗。超过三分之一的人被转诊到门诊精神病治疗,而大约一半的转诊者在不同年龄范围内接受了至少一次治疗。事件发生率估计通常较低。亚组分析发现,老年人(平均样本年龄:≥60岁)可能比年轻人(平均样本年龄:≤25岁)和成年人(平均样本年龄:>25岁至<60岁)在自我伤害后接受门诊精神病治疗的可能性更低。最近的研究与提及的陈述(事件)比例略有增加有关,并收到,精神病门诊治疗。没有宏观层面的因素解释研究之间的异质性。
    在医院自我伤害后,在住院和门诊精神病护理的分配和提供方面还有相当大的改进空间,特别是考虑到从综合医院出院后的时期是重复自我伤害和自杀的高峰危险期。鉴于研究之间明显的异质性,因此,目前尚不清楚分配善后治疗的依据,需要进一步研究.
    本次审查没有具体资金。
    UNASSIGNED: Hospital-treated self-harm is common, costly, and strongly associated with suicide. Whilst effective psychosocial interventions exist, little is known about what key factors might modify the clinical decision to refer an individual to psychiatric in- and/or out-patient treatment following an episode of hospital-treated self-harm.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched five electronic databases (CENTRAL, CDSR, MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO) until 3 January 2023 for studies reporting data on either the proportion of patients and/or events that receive a referral and/or discharge to psychiatric in- and/or outpatient treatment after an episode of hospital-treated self-harm. Pooled weighted prevalence estimates were calculated using the random effects model with the Freedman-Tukey double arcsine adjustment in R, version 4.0.5. We also investigated whether several study-level and macro-level factors explained variability for these outcomes using random-effects meta-regression. The protocol of this review was pre-registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021261531).
    UNASSIGNED: 189 publications, representing 131 unique studies, which reported data on 243,953 individual participants who had engaged in a total of 174,359 episodes of self-harm were included. Samples were drawn from 44 different countries. According to World Bank classifications, most (83.7%) samples were from high income countries. Across the age range, one-quarter of persons were referred for inpatient psychiatric care and, of these, around one-fifth received treatment. Just over one-third were referred to outpatient psychiatric care, whilst around half of those referred received at least one treatment session across the age range. Event rate estimates were generally of a lower magnitude. Subgroup analyses found that older adults (mean sample age: ≥60 years) may be less likely than young people (mean sample age: ≤25 years) and adults (mean sample age: >25 years to <60 years) to be referred for outpatient psychiatric care following self-harm. More recent studies were associated with a small increase in the proportion of presentations (events) that were referred to, and received, psychiatric outpatient treatment. No macro-level factor explained between-study heterogeneity.
    UNASSIGNED: There is considerable scope for improvement in the allocation and provision of both in- and out-patient psychiatric care following hospital-presenting self-harm, particularly considering that the period after discharge from general hospitals represents the peak risk period for repeat self-harm and suicide. Given the marked between-study heterogeneity, the basis for allocation of aftercare treatment is therefore not yet known and should be further studied.
    UNASSIGNED: There was no specific funding for this review.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:最近的共识研究标准已经确定了一种“精神病发作”形式的路易体前驱痴呆(DLB),其特征是突出的迟发性精神症状。尽管人们认为提高诊断怀疑指数很重要,有关该队列的证据被认为太有限,无法采用正式标准.我们回顾了已发表的关于精神病发作性DLB的文献,以确定关键的临床特征和证据空白,以促进我们对该实体的理解。
    方法:Medline,搜索PubMed和Embase的相关文章,其中包含对最初患有精神疾病的患者的纵向随访,这些患者随后根据当时可用的诊断标准发展为DLB。
    结果:两个队列研究(18和21例患者)以及12例病例系列(13例)共确定52例患者(63%为女性)。最初的精神病表现平均发生在63年(范围53-88),抑郁症是最常报告的精神病表现(88%)。精神病性表现在表现上较不常见(11%),但在诊断DLB之前的整个前驱期变得更加普遍(83%)。94%(32/34)的患者普遍存在精神疾病的复发。帕金森病,认知波动,视觉幻觉,和REM睡眠行为障碍在初次报告时并不常见(3.8%)。
    结论:精神病性发病型DLB的特征是女性为主的复发-缓解性精神疾病,表现为情感症状,但在DLB发病之前出现精神病特征。需要其他前瞻性研究,包括其他具有统一评估的神经退行性队列,以告知这种情况的明确诊断标准。
    BACKGROUND: Recent consensus research criteria have identified a \'psychiatric onset\' form of prodromal dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) characterised by prominent late-onset psychiatric symptoms. Although recognised as important to raise the index of diagnostic suspicion, evidence regarding this cohort was deemed too limited to impose formal criteria. We reviewed the published literature on psychiatric-onset DLB to identify key clinical characteristics and evidence gaps to progress our understanding of this entity.
    METHODS: Medline, PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant articles containing longitudinal follow-up of patients initially presenting with a psychiatric illness who subsequently developed DLB according to the diagnostic criteria available at the time.
    RESULTS: Two cohort studies (18 and 21 patients) along with 12 case series (13 cases) were identified totalling 52 patients (63% female). Initial psychiatric presentation occurred at a mean of 63 years (range 53-88), with depression being the most frequently reported psychiatric presentation (88%). Psychotic presentations were less common on presentation (11%) but became more prevalent throughout the prodromal period before the diagnosis of DLB (83%). Relapses of the psychiatric disease were common occurring in 94% (32/34) of patients. Parkinsonism, cognitive fluctuations, visual hallucinations, and REM sleep behaviour disorder were uncommonly reported at initial presentation (3.8%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric-onset DLB is characterized by a female predominant relapsing-remitting psychiatric illness presenting with affective symptoms but later developing psychotic features prior to the onset of DLB. Additional prospective studies including other neurodegenerative cohorts with harmonised assessments are required to inform definitive diagnostic criteria for this condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:妄想侵染,也被称为Ekbom综合征,是一种罕见的妄想症,其特征是固定的信念,即寄生虫感染,蠕虫,昆虫,或其他生物。尽管妄想症是一种精神病,患者经常向皮肤科医生咨询皮肤检查结果,目前尚不清楚这种疾病的推荐治疗方法。
    目的:我们旨在系统回顾和描述原发性妄想感染患者的治疗和管理。
    方法:使用Ovid在MEDLINE上进行了系统搜索,Embase,PsycINFO,和Cochrane临床试验注册。相关数据,包括治疗,剂量,回应,坚持,和副作用,进行了提取和分析。
    结果:共包括15个病例系列,包括280名患者(平均年龄53.3岁,65.4%的女性)患有妄想感染。总的来说,阿立哌唑的完全缓解率最高,为79%(11/14),尽管这仅限于14名患者。在药物类别中,选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂在共患抑郁症患者中最有效,完全缓解率为79%(11/14),部分缓解率为43%(9/21),焦虑,或者毛滴虫病。第一代抗精神病药和第二代抗精神病药的完全缓解率相似(56/103,54.4%vs56/117,47.9%,分别)和部分缓解率(36/103,35%vs41/117,35%,分别)。
    结论:由于妄想症的罕见性,我们只发现了15个系列病例.然而,我们发现,第一代抗精神病药物治疗原发性妄想感染的有效性与第二代抗精神病药物相似.需要更大规模的研究和随机对照试验来评估药物治疗妄想侵染的疗效。
    背景:PROSPEROCRD42020198161;https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?RecordID=198161。
    BACKGROUND: Delusional infestation, also known as Ekbom syndrome, is a rare delusional disorder characterized by the fixed belief that one is infested with parasites, worms, insects, or other organisms. Although delusional infestation is a psychiatric condition, patients often consult dermatologists with skin findings, and it is currently unclear what treatments are recommended for this disorder.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to systematically review and describe the treatment and management of patients presenting with primary delusional infestation.
    METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using Ovid on MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials. Relevant data, including treatment, dosage, response, adherence, and side effects, were extracted and analyzed.
    RESULTS: A total of 15 case series were included, comprising 280 patients (mean age 53.3 years, 65.4% female) with delusional infestation. Overall, aripiprazole had the highest complete remission rate at 79% (11/14), although this was limited to 14 patients. Among drug classes, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were the most effective with a 79% (11/14) complete remission rate and 43% (9/21) partial remission rate in patients with comorbid depression, anxiety, or trichotillomania. First-generation antipsychotics and second-generation antipsychotics had similar complete remission rates (56/103, 54.4% vs 56/117, 47.9%, respectively) and partial remission rates (36/103, 35% vs 41/117, 35%, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: Due to the rarity of delusional infestation, we only found 15 case series. However, we found that first-generation antipsychotics appear to be similar in effectiveness to second-generation antipsychotics for the treatment of primary delusional infestation. Larger studies and randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological therapy for delusional infestation.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42020198161; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=198161.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:许多COVID-19患者报告持续的症状,包括认知障碍。我们对这个主题进行了范围审查,主要关注认知表现。
    方法:综述了在PubMed上发表的关于SARS-CoV-2感染后持续存在的认知参与的研究摘要和全文(直到2023年5月),专注于用来命名认知综合症的术语,报告的症状,它们的发病时间和持续时间,和测试电池使用。报告的精神症状,他们的评估工具,还提取了更一般的表现。
    结果:在确定的947条记录中,共纳入180项研究。只有三分之一的人使用标签来定义综合症。少数研究包括根据严格的综合症发作时间标准的患者(34%),而更多的研究报告了最低要求的症状持续时间(77%)。最常报告的认知症状是记忆和注意力执行障碍,而在精神病投诉中,最常见的是焦虑症状,抑郁症,和睡眠障碍。大多数研究报告了一般症状中的疲劳。36项研究采用了认知测量:单独的筛查测试(n=19),全神经心理电池(n=25),或两者(n=29),而30项研究进行了精神病学测试。39%的受试者表现出认知缺陷,受影响最频繁的领域是注意力/执行功能(90%)和记忆力(67%)。
    结论:目前,在COVID-19后认知综合征的标签上没有一致意见。急性感染后症状发作的时间及其持续时间仍在讨论中。记忆和注意力-行政投诉和缺陷,连同疲劳,焦虑和抑郁症状报告一致,但对这些症状的客观评价尚未标准化.
    Many COVID-19 patients report persistent symptoms, including cognitive disturbances. We performed a scoping review on this topic, focusing primarily on cognitive manifestations.
    Abstracts and full texts of studies published on PubMed (until May 2023) addressing cognitive involvement persisting after SARS-CoV-2 infection were reviewed, focusing on terms used to name the cognitive syndrome, reported symptoms, their onset time and duration, and testing batteries employed. Reported psychiatric symptoms, their assessment tools, and more general manifestations were also extracted.
    Among the 947 records identified, 180 studies were included. Only one third of them used a label to define the syndrome. A minority of studies included patients according to stringent temporal criteria of syndrome onset (34%), whereas more studies reported a minimum required symptom duration (77%). The most frequently reported cognitive symptoms were memory and attentional-executive disturbances, and among psychiatric complaints, the most frequent were anxiety symptoms, depression, and sleep disturbances. Most studies reported fatigue among general symptoms. Thirty-six studies employed cognitive measures: screening tests alone (n = 19), full neuropsychological batteries (n = 25), or both (n = 29); 30 studies performed psychiatric testing. Cognitive deficits were demonstrated in 39% of subjects, the most frequently affected domains being attention/executive functions (90%) and memory (67%).
    Currently, no agreement exists on a label for post-COVID-19 cognitive syndrome. The time of symptom onset after acute infection and symptom duration are still discussed. Memory and attention-executive complaints and deficits, together with fatigue, anxiety, and depression symptoms, are consistently reported, but the objective evaluation of these symptoms is not standardized.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    两年多来,对COVID-19挥之不去的后遗症进行了广泛的研究。大约10%的感染COVID-19的人被发现出现长期症状,称为“长期COVID-19”。长COVID-19的神经和精神表现特别令人担忧。虽然发病机制尚不清楚,新兴的影像学研究已经开始更好地阐明某些病理表现。特别感兴趣的是用[18F]FDGPET成像,其直接反映通常与代谢和炎症过程相关的细胞糖酵解。为了了解长COVID-19的神经特征的分子基础,这篇综述涵盖了该领域的最新[18F]FDGPET文献。
    For more than two years, lingering sequalae of COVID-19 have been extensively investigated. Approximately 10% of individuals infected by COVID-19 have been found to experience long-term symptoms termed \"long COVID-19\". The neurological and psychiatric manifestations of long COVID-19 are of particular concern. While pathogenesis remains unclear, emerging imaging studies have begun to better elucidate certain pathological manifestation. Of specific interest is imaging with [18F]FDG PET which directly reflects cellular glycolysis often linked to metabolic and inflammatory processes. Seeking to understand the molecular basis of neurological features of long COVID-19, this review encompasses the most recent [18F]FDG PET literature in this area.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:危重病人吸入麻醉药镇静可以减轻肺部炎症,拔管时间,和ICU住院时间与静脉注射(i.v.)镇静剂相比。然而,吸入麻醉药对该人群认知和精神病结局的影响尚不清楚.在这次系统审查中,我们旨在总结吸入麻醉药对危重病成人认知和精神结局的影响.
    方法:我们搜索了MEDLINE,EMBASE,和用于案例系列的PsycINFO,回顾性,和吸入麻醉药镇静的危重成人的前瞻性研究。结果包括谵妄,精神运动和神经恢复,长期认知功能障碍,ICU的记忆,焦虑,抑郁症,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),和用于评估的工具。
    结果:13项研究纳入不同的心脏骤停后幸存者人群(n=4),术后非心脏病患者(n=3),术后心脏病患者(n=2),和混合的医疗手术患者(n=4)。8项研究报告了谵妄发生率,两个神经恢复,还有两个ICU记忆.一项关于精神运动恢复的研究报告,长期认知功能障碍,焦虑,抑郁症,PTSD对五项试验的荟萃分析发现,吸入镇静剂和静脉镇静剂之间的谵妄发生率没有差异(相对风险0.95[95%置信区间:0.59-1.54])。与静脉注射镇静剂相比,吸入麻醉药与较少的幻觉和较快的精神运动恢复相关,但在其他结局方面无差异.使用的工具和这些评估的时间存在异质性。
    结论:根据现有的有限证据,在ICU中接受挥发性镇静剂或静脉镇静剂的成年人之间,认知和精神结局没有差异.未来的研究应在住院期间和住院后使用经过验证的工具进行结果评估。
    PROSPEROCRD42021236455。
    Sedation of critically ill patients with inhaled anaesthetics may reduce lung inflammation, time to extubation, and ICU length of stay compared with intravenous (i.v.) sedatives. However, the impact of inhaled anaesthetics on cognitive and psychiatric outcomes in this population is unclear. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarise the effect of inhaled anaesthetics on cognitive and psychiatric outcomes in critically ill adults.
    We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO for case series, retrospective, and prospective studies in critically ill adults sedated with inhaled anaesthetics. Outcomes included delirium, psychomotor and neurological recovery, long-term cognitive dysfunction, ICU memories, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and instruments used for assessment.
    Thirteen studies were included in distinct populations of post-cardiac arrest survivors (n=4), postoperative noncardiac patients (n=3), postoperative cardiac patients (n=2), and mixed medical-surgical patients (n=4). Eight studies reported delirium incidence, two neurological recovery, and two ICU memories. One study reported on psychomotor recovery, long-term cognitive dysfunction, anxiety, depression, and PTSD. A meta-analysis of five trials found no difference in delirium incidence between inhaled and i.v. sedatives (relative risk 0.95 [95% confidence interval: 0.59-1.54]). Compared with i.v. sedatives, inhaled anaesthetics were associated with fewer hallucinations and faster psychomotor recovery but no differences in other outcomes. There was heterogeneity in the instruments used and timing of these assessments.
    Based on the limited evidence available, there is no difference in cognitive and psychiatric outcomes between adults exposed to volatile sedation or intravenous sedation in the ICU. Future studies should incorporate outcome assessment with validated tools during and after hospital stay.
    PROSPERO CRD42021236455.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号