While various treatment options for primary snoring are available, evidence-based recommendations to determine the optimal intervention remain unestablished. To inform future directions of research to guide clinical decision-making, this scoping review was conducted to map the existing evidence on interventions for primary snoring, the outcomes and instruments used to assess their clinical effects in adults. The feasibility of conducting further systematic reviews and comparing outcomes across these therapies using network meta-analysis was also assessed. Of the 1673 records identified, 38 interventional studies met the inclusion criteria with three-fifths of them being before-after studies. The most common reason for study exclusion was results being reported for patients with primary snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) combined. Interventions were surgical (73 %), behavioural and the use of devices/medications. Twenty-six common outcomes were identified and categorised into six domains. Fifty-nine instruments were used to assess the outcomes and based mainly on non-validated questionnaires. Our findings indicated (1) the need for randomised controlled trials with strict discrimination between patients with primary snoring and OSA, (2) further network meta-analyses using some outcomes is feasible, and (3) a core outcome set to inform standardised reporting for future research should be developed.

Untreated pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with significant morbidities affecting behavior, neurocognitive development, endocrine and metabolic health. This systematic review evaluated prevalence of OSA reported in population-based studies among preschoolers as early intervention may have positive effects on health and quality of life. Thirty studies were included. High degrees of heterogeneity in methods and definitions were observed between the studies. Seven studies confirmed OSA by implementing objective methods after screening for habitual snoring with only two studies utilizing polysomnography, the reference standard, testing 1.2% of the combined cohorts (n = 82/4575) to confirm disease. Diagnosis of OSA was based on utilizing retired thresholds of the apnea-hypopnea-index (AHI), AHI4%≥5/hour of sleep (hrSleep), reporting prevalence of 1.8% and 6.4%, respectively. The remaining five studies implemented relatively insensitive objective recording methods to confirm disease in a limited number of children (n = 449/2486; 18.0%), estimating prevalence in the range of 0.7%-13.0%. The remaining literature is based on implementing questionnaires only to evaluate OSA. Studies published before 2014 reported 3.3%-9.4% prevalence, while more recent studies published 2016-2023 report higher prevalence, 12.8%-20.4%, when excluding outliers. This trend suggests that prevalence of OSA may possibly have been increasing in preschoolers over the past decade.

The aim of this review was to systematically evaluate the available scientific evidence on the benefit of mandibular advancement devices (MADs) in the treatment of primary snoring (PS). From 905 initially identified articles, 18 were selected. Papers that provided indirect information regarding obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and/or sleep breathing disorders (SBD) were included. Information was obtained on monoblock and duoblock appliances from the selected studies. The devices were most commonly able to achieve 50%-70% of the maximum mandibular protrusion. The frequently used outcome measurements were the apnea-hypopnea index, Epworth sleepiness scale, and oxygen desaturation index, which all yielded positive post-treatment results. The most common side effects were temporomandibular joint pain and excessive salivation, which improved with time. Our findings indicated that the use of MADs, even with varying designs, improved outcomes in all the reported patient populations (PS, OSAS, and SBD). Despite the lack of studies on PS, the available evidence supports the use of MADs for treatment of PS. Snoring should be treated from a preventive and psychosocial perspective to avoid progression to more severe diseases that could have a significant medical and economic impact.

In light of previous reported associations between sleep disordered breathing (SDB) and symptoms of attention deficits, the aim of this systematic review (SR) was to evaluate this association in adults.
Searches were performed on seven main databases including Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsyncInfo, Livivo and Lilacs; as well as grey literature through Google Scholar, Proquest and OpenGrey. Furthermore, hand-searches were conducted on the reference lists of included articles. Experts were consulted to improve search findings. Risk of Bias was gauged using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. The cumulative evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria.
2009 references were identified. After phase-1 and phase-2 of screening against eligibility criteria, eight cross-sectional and one cohort studies were retained for qualitative analysis. Five studies were included for quantitative analysis, with no significant association found (p = 0.99). From the qualitative assessment, three papers showed a positive association with at least one attention symptoms. Risk of bias was judged to be low for six studies and three were classified with moderate risk of bias. Confidence in cumulative evidence was considered very low for continuous data.
Despite the plausibility of an association between SDB and symptoms of attention deficits in adults, current published evidence does not either confirm or refute such association as inferred from its low to very low certainty level.

Primary snoring, also known as simple or non-apnoeic snoring, is regarded as the first stage of sleep disordered breathing without severe medical consequences for the snorer and co-sleeper. Although it is a highly prevalent phenomenon in the general population, our knowledge is limited because of the lack of a consensus on terminology. This systematic review of the aspects used in the definitions of simple/primary snoring was conducted to obtain an inventory of current practices and compare these definitions with the conceptual definition of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. PubMed and Web of Science were searched from July 2016 onwards without any language limitations, and 362 references were obtained. After selection based on titles, 39 remained, among which 29 contained a definition or reference to a definition. In 69% of the studies, a cut-off <5 apnoea/Hypopnoea events per hour of sleep on the Apnoea-Hypopnoea Index was used. Despite this tendency, the cut-offs ranged from 0 to <15/h. Unfortunately, the cut-off and occasional requirements did not match the conceptual definition of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. A consensus must be reached on an operational and clinically relevant definition based on the clear conceptual definition.