这里,我们旨在比较不同保存方法对粪便微生物群结局的影响.我们使用长达1年的粪便样本保存实验评估了不同保存方法的效果。根据是否添加了无水乙醇以及是否低温保存,对健康志愿者粪便样本进行分组。此外,我们进行了一项系统评价,以结合目前粪便微生物群保存的证据.我们发现,在室温+无水乙醇组,在第12个月,变形杆菌显著改变,Veillonellaceae显著降低。四个冷冻保存组在12个月内与新鲜样本有更多的相似之处;然而,不同的冷冻保存方法对几种门的影响不同,家庭,和属。系统评价显示,在RNAlater中储存1个月的样品的Shannon多样性和Simpson指数与在-80°C下立即储存的样品相比无统计学意义(分别为P=0.220和P=0.123)。-80°C冰箱和10%甘油的液氮冷冻保存都可以维持粪便样品的稳定微生物群,以便长期保存。在冷冻保存的样品中添加无水乙醇对保存粪便微生物特性的影响没有显着差异。我们的研究为粪便微生物群的长期保存研究提供了有关保存细节的经验见解。系统评价和荟萃分析发现,肠道菌群结构,composition,以及通过储存方法保存的样本的多样性,如保存溶液,相对稳定,适合在室温下短期储存。重要性肠道细菌的研究已经变得越来越流行,粪便样品保存方法和时间需要标准化。这里,我们详细介绍了一项为期12个月的粪便样本保存研究,我们的研究为肠道微生物学研究领域长期高质量储存粪便样品提供了实验细节的经验参考。结果表明,-80℃/液氮深低温保存和10%甘油相结合是最有效的粪便样品保存方法,适合长期储存至少12个月。在深层冷冻保存的样品中添加无水乙醇对粪便微生物学特性的保存没有显着差异。结合系统评价和荟萃分析的结果,我们相信,当研究人员保存粪便标本时,根据研究目标选择合适的保存方法和时间是至关重要的。
Here, we aimed to compare the effects of different preservation methods on outcomes of fecal microbiota. We evaluated the effects of different preservation methods using stool sample preservation experiments for up to 1 year. The stool samples from feces of healthy volunteers were grouped based on whether absolute ethanol was added and whether they were hypothermically preserved. Besides, we performed a systematic
review to combine current fecal microbiota preservation evidence. We found that Proteobacteria changed significantly and Veillonellaceae decreased significantly in the 12th month in the room temperature + absolute ethanol group. The four cryopreservation groups have more similarities with fresh sample in the 12 months; however, different cryopreservation methods have different effects on several phyla, families, and genera. A systematic
review showed that the Shannon diversity and Simpson index of samples stored in RNAlater for 1 month were not statistically significant compared with those stored immediately at -80°C (P = 0.220 and P = 0.123, respectively). The -80°C refrigerator and liquid nitrogen cryopreservation with 10% glycerine can both maintain stable microbiota of stool samples for long-term preservation. The addition of absolute ethanol to cryopreserved samples had no significant difference in the effect of preserving fecal microbial characteristics. Our study provides empirical insights into preservation details for future studies of the long-term preservation of fecal microbiota. Systematic
review and meta-analysis found that the gut microbiota structure, composition, and diversity of samples preserved by storage methods, such as preservation solution, are relatively stable, which were suitable for short-term storage at room temperature. IMPORTANCE The study of gut bacteria has become increasingly popular, and fecal sample preservation methods and times need to be standardized. Here, we detail a 12-month study of fecal sample preservation, and our study provides an empirical reference about experimental details for long-term high-quality storage of fecal samples in the field of gut microbiology research. The results showed that the combination of -80°C/liquid nitrogen deep cryopreservation and 10% glycerol was the most effective method for the preservation of stool samples, which is suitable for long-term storage for at least 12 months. The addition of anhydrous ethanol to the deep cryopreserved samples did not make a significant difference in the preservation of fecal microbiological characteristics. Combined with the results of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, we believe that, when researchers preserve fecal specimens, it is essential to select the proper preservation method and time period in accordance with the goal of the study.