Predictor

预测器
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    残留症状在重度抑郁症(MDD)中普遍存在,包括广泛的症状,如睡眠障碍,体重和食欲的变化,认知障碍,和焦虑。这些症状持续损害日常功能,降低生活质量,并预测疾病复发。尽管它们具有临床意义,残留症状缺乏统一的定义,可能导致与治疗时出现的症状混淆和研究中的歧义,从而阻碍了研究成果的普遍性。虽然一些研究将失眠和情绪障碍确定为关键指标,其他研究强调不同的症状或发现没有显著的相关性。残留症状定义不一致,以及不同研究的方法差异,导致这些相互矛盾的结果。虽然临床医生专注于缓解阴性症状以改善功能状态,患者通常优先考虑获得积极影响和整体健康作为成功治疗的重要组成部分。这需要对抑郁症患者采取全面的护理方法。本文综述了MDD中残留症状的现象,关注定义的模糊性,临床特征,以及它们对长期结果的影响。缺乏对残留症状的标准化监管或学术定义导致临床医生之间的不同解释。强调需要标准化的术语来指导有效的治疗策略和未来的研究。
    Residual symptoms are prevalent in major depressive disorder (MDD), encompassing a wide spectrum of symptoms such as sleep disturbances, changes in weight and appetite, cognitive impairment, and anxiety. These symptoms consistently impair daily functioning, diminish quality of life, and forecast disease relapse. Despite their clinical significance, residual symptoms lack a unified definition, potentially leading to confusion with treatment-emergent symptoms and ambiguity across studies, thereby hindering the generalizability of research findings. While some research identifies insomnia and mood disturbances as critical indicators, other studies emphasize different symptoms or find no significant correlation. Inconsistencies in defining residual symptoms, as well as methodological differences across studies, contribute to these conflicting results. While clinicians focus on alleviating negative symptoms to improve functional status, patients often prioritize achieving positive affect and overall well-being as essential components of successful treatment. It necessitates a comprehensive approach to patient care in depression. This review explores the phenomenon of residual symptoms in MDD, focusing on the ambiguity in definitions, clinical characteristics, and their impact on long-term outcomes. The lack of a standardized regulatory or academic definition for residual symptoms leads to varied interpretations among clinicians, underscoring the need for standardized terminology to guide effective treatment strategies and future research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:心理社会评估是左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入的多学科评估的核心组成部分。社会心理状况被认为是LVAD植入禁忌症的程度仍在争论中。本系统评价研究了可改变的社会心理因素作为LVAD植入患者预后的预测因子。
    方法:我们遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目进行了系统评价。搜索结果为2509篇文章。重复数据删除后,摘要和全文回顾,确定了20篇相关文章。
    结果:纳入的研究评估了社会经济地位(n=6),护理人员特征(n=6),非依从性(n=6),物质使用(n=13),和精神疾病(n=8)。最常见的测量结果是全因死亡,再入院率,和不良事件。研究在每个心理社会因素的定义和选定的结果方面差异很大。在所有研究中,没有心理社会因素与特定结果一致相关。社会经济地位通常与结果无关。不遵守,精神病,药物使用与更高的死亡风险相关,不良事件,和/或重新接纳。关于护理人员特征的发现好坏参半。
    结论:在研究的社会心理因素中,不坚持,精神病,药物使用与死亡风险增加最相关,重新接纳,和/或不良事件。研究方法和研究质量的异质性排除了有关社会心理因素对长期患者预后影响的坚定结论。这篇综述的结果表明,需要进行足够有力的研究,使用统一的社会心理因素定义来阐明这些因素与LVAD植入后结局之间的关系。
    BACKGROUND: Psychosocial assessment is a core component of the multidisciplinary evaluation for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The degree to which psychosocial conditions are considered a contraindication to LVAD implantation continues to be debated. This systematic review examines modifiable psychosocial factors as predictors of outcomes in patients undergoing LVAD implantation.
    METHODS: We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The search resulted in 2509 articles. After deduplication, abstract and full-text review, 20 relevant articles were identified.
    RESULTS: Included studies evaluated socioeconomic status (n = 6), caregiver characteristics (n = 6), non-adherence (n = 6), substance use (n = 13), and psychiatric disorder (n = 8). The most commonly measured outcomes were all-cause death, readmission rate, and adverse events. Studies varied widely in definition of each psychosocial factor and selected outcomes. No psychosocial factor was consistently associated with a specific outcome in all studies. Socioeconomic status was generally not associated with outcomes. Non-adherence, psychiatric disorder, and substance use were associated with higher risks of mortality, adverse events, and/or readmission. Findings on caregiver characteristics were mixed.
    CONCLUSIONS: Of the psychosocial factors studied, non-adherence, psychiatric disorder, and substance use were the most consistently associated with an increased risk of mortality, readmission, and/or adverse events. Heterogeneity in research methodology and study quality across studies precludes firm conclusions regarding the impact of psychosocial factors on long-term patient outcomes. The results of this review reveal a need for adequately powered studies that use uniform definitions of psychosocial factors to clarify relationships between these factors and outcomes after LVAD implantation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本系统综述旨在综合基于网络和移动的抑郁症干预(IMI)治疗结果的预测因素和调节因素的证据。告知个性化护理。整个PubMed的系统搜索,PsycInfo,Cochrane得出了33,002个结果。两名评审员独立进行筛选,数据提取,偏见风险评估,和方法学质量评价。58项单一研究(m=466项分析)侧重于基线预测因子(59.7%,m=278),过程预测因子(16.5%,m=77),和主持人(21.9%,m=102),纳入6个个体患者数据荟萃分析(m=93).单个研究中只有24.0%(m=112/466)的分析和个体患者数据荟萃分析中的15.1%(m=14/93)是显著的。来自单个研究的证据对于所有变量类别被认为是不充分的,在40个类别中只有2个显示>50%的显著结果。基线抑郁严重程度具有最强的预测价值,较高的分数与更好的结果相关,其次是指示变化过程的变量。其他经常分析和潜在相关的具有显著结果的变量是依从性,年龄,教育水平,种族,关系状态,治疗史,和行为变量。更多具有足够力量的高质量定量研究对于验证和扩展研究结果至关重要,确定与IMI特别相关的预测因子和调节因子,以解释不同的治疗效果。
    This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence on predictors and moderators of treatment outcomes in internet- and mobile-based interventions (IMIs) for depression, informing personalized care. A systematic search across PubMed, PsycInfo, and Cochrane yielded 33,002 results. Two reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and methodological quality evaluation. Fifty-eight single studies (m = 466 analyses) focusing on baseline-predictors (59.7 %, m = 278), process-predictors (16.5 %, m = 77), and moderators (21.9 %, m = 102), and six individual patient data meta-analyses (m = 93) were included. Only 24.0 % (m = 112/466) of analyses in single studies and 15.1 % (m = 14/93) in individual patient data meta-analyses were significant. Evidence from single studies was rated as insufficient for all variable categories with only 2 out of 40 categories showing >50 % significant results. Baseline depression severity had the strongest predictive value with higher scores linked to better outcomes followed by variables indicative for the course-of-change. Other frequently analyzed and potentially relevant variables with significant results were adherence, age, educational level, ethnicity, relationship status, treatment history, and behavioral variables. More high quality quantitative studies with sufficient power are essential to validate and expand findings, identifying predictors and moderators specifically relevant in IMIs to explain differential treatment effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:通常观察到儿童和青少年抑郁症状的纵向模式存在群体差异。然而,对成人心理健康的影响尚不清楚.本研究对儿童和青少年抑郁轨迹研究进行了系统综述,并对其对成人抑郁症状和障碍的纵向影响进行了荟萃分析。
    方法:一项系统搜索确定了12项纵向研究(12项队列,N=35,058),在18岁之前进行了协调以识别常见症状轨迹。在同一组中进行随访检查,以估计与成人抑郁症状和障碍的纵向关联。使用随机效应荟萃分析。
    结果:纳入的研究确定低(70.3%),中度(17.9%),高(9.5%),症状轨迹增加(9.5%)和减少(5.1%)。发现这些轨迹可以预测成年期症状和疾病的变化:低,Dx=4.5%,95%CI2.7-6.8%,Sx=8.33,SD=6.30;中度,Dx=20.9%,CI11.9-31.5%-Sx=18.13,SD=3.38;高,Dx=34.4%CI17.2-54.0%-Sx=38.80,SD=7.75;增加,Dx=38.3%,CI12.7-67.5%-Sx=24.73,SD=18.64;下降,Dx=15.4%,CI10.5-20.9%-Sx=17.00,SD=12.18。
    结论:对于某些轨迹效应,置信区间很宽。高轨迹的预测效果存在显著的队列间异质性,这表明需要进一步研究以识别影响变异的特征。
    结论:低症状轨迹预测较低的成人抑郁症状和障碍。计划有效地针对适度的减少,High,增加和减少轨迹可能会防止成年早期的问题。
    BACKGROUND: Group differences in longitudinal patterns of child and adolescent depressive symptoms are commonly observed. However, the implications for adult mental health are unclear. This study presents a systematic review of child and adolescent depressive symptom trajectory research and meta-analysis of their longitudinal effects on adult depressive symptoms and disorders.
    METHODS: A systematic search identified 12 longitudinal studies (12 cohorts, N = 35,058) that were harmonized to identify common symptom trajectories prior to age 18 years. Examination of follow-up in the same groups was made (at average age 20.5 years) to estimate longitudinal associations with adult depressive symptoms (Sx) and disorders (Dx), using random effects meta-analyses.
    RESULTS: The included studies identified Low (70.3 %), Moderate (17.9 %), High (9.5 %), Increasing (9.5 %) and Decreasing (5.1 %) symptom trajectories. These trajectories were found to predict variation in symptoms and disorders in adulthood: Low, Dx = 4.5 %, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 2.7-6.8 %, Sx [Mean] = 8.33, Standard Deviation [SD] = 6.30; Moderate, Dx = 20.9 %, CI 11.9-31.5 % - Sx = 18.13, SD = 3.38; High, Dx = 34.4 % CI 17.2-54.0 % - Sx = 38.80, SD = 7.75; Increasing, Dx = 38.3 %, CI 12.7-67.5 % - Sx = 24.73, SD = 18.64; Decreasing, Dx = 15.4 %, CI 10.5-20.9 % - Sx = 17.00, SD = 12.18.
    CONCLUSIONS: Confidence intervals are wide for some trajectory effects. There was significant between-cohort heterogeneity in predictive effects for High trajectories, suggesting the need for further research to identify characteristics influencing variation.
    CONCLUSIONS: Low symptom trajectories forecast lower adult depression symptoms and disorders. Programs effectively targeting reductions in Moderate, High, Increasing and Decreasing trajectories will likely prevent problems in early adulthood.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    家庭治疗(HT)通过跨学科团队治疗急性危机中的患者,每天预约治疗时间短。HT的有效性已经得到证实。然而,只有少数研究涉及特定患者特征与治疗结果相关.本研究旨在确定与HT成功结局相关的患者特征。根据PRISMA指南进行了系统的文献检索。共有13项研究纳入系统评价。被雇佣,有固定收入,患有焦虑症和家庭参与与HT的成功治疗结局相关.在选定的研究中,高症状严重程度和以前住院与HT的不成功治疗结果相关。HT似乎对有偿就业或固定收入的患者特别有益,焦虑症患者,以及有家庭或其他社会支持的患者。
    Home treatment (HT) treats patients in an acute crisis through an interdisciplinary team with daily appointments for a short treatment period. The effectiveness of HT has already been confirmed. However, only few studies addressed specific patient characteristics associated outcome of treatment. This study aimed to identify patient characteristics associated with successful outcomes of HT. A systematic literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A total of 13 studies were included in the systematic review. Being employed, having a regular income, having an anxiety disorder and family involvement were associated with a successful treatment outcome in HT. High symptom severity and former hospital admissions were associated with unsuccessful treatment outcome in HT in the selected studies. HT seems to be especially beneficial for patients with paid employment or regular income, patients with anxiety disorders, and patients with familial or other social support.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:缺乏关于使用MRI进行STS分级的系统评价。这篇综述分析了不同MRI特征在推断STS组织学分级中的作用。
    方法:进行系统评价,并按照系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)检查表的首选报告项目进行报告。系统地搜索了PubMed/MEDLINE的电子数据库,以查找有关软组织肉瘤MRI发现与肿瘤分级的相关性的文献。作为关键字\"MRI\",“磁共振成像”,\"肉瘤\",\"等级\",\"分级\",并选择了“FNCLCC”。
    结果:14项研究已纳入本系统综述。肿瘤大小(p=0.015(51例)至p=0.81(36例)),肿瘤边缘(p<0.001(95例)至0.93(36例)),坏死(p=0.004(50例)到p=0.65(95例)),瘤周水肿(p=0.002(130例)至p=0.337(40例)),在纳入的大多数研究中,对比增强(p<0.01(50例)~0.019(51例))和多环/多小叶肿瘤构型(p=0.008(71例))与STS恶性程度显著相关.T2w图像的异质性(p=0.003(130例)至0.202(40例)),T1w图像中的信号强度/出血(p=0.02(130例)至0.5(31例)),肿瘤周围对比增强(p<0.001(95例)至0.253(51例))和肿瘤弥散限制(p=0.01(51例)至0.53(52例))在一些研究中被认为与FNCLCC等级显着相关这些特征。大多数其他MRI特征不显著。
    结论:一些MRI特征,如肿瘤大小,坏死,瘤周水肿,瘤周对比增强,肿瘤内对比增强,和多环/多小叶肿瘤构型可能表明STS的恶性程度。然而,需要进一步的研究才能达成共识。
    OBJECTIVE: Systematic reviews on the grading of STS using MRI are lacking. This review analyses the role of different MRI features in inferring the histological grade of STS.
    METHODS: A systematic review was conducted and is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) checklist. The electronic databases of PubMed/MEDLINE were systematically searched for literature addressing the correlation of MRI findings in soft tissue sarcoma with tumor grade. As keywords \"MRI\", \"magnetic resonance imaging\", \"sarcoma\", \"grade\", \"grading\", and \"FNCLCC\" have been selected.
    RESULTS: 14 studies have been included in this systematic review. Tumor size (p = 0.015 (51 patients) to p = 0.81 (36 patients)), tumor margin (p < 0.001 (95 patients) to 0.93 (36 patients)), necrosis (p = 0.004 (50 patients) to p = 0.65 (95 patients)), peritumoral edema (p = 0.002 (130 patients) to p = 0.337 (40 patients)), contrast enhancement (p < 0.01 (50 patients) to 0.019 (51 patients)) and polycyclic/multilobulated tumor configuration (p = 0.008 (71 patients)) were significantly associated with STS malignancy grade in most of the included studies. Heterogeneity in T2w images (p = 0.003 (130 patients) to 0.202 (40 patients)), signal intensity in T1w images/ hemorrhage (p = 0.02 (130 patients) to 0.5 (31 patients)), peritumoral contrast enhancement (p < 0.001 (95 patients) to 0.253 (51 patients)) and tumoral diffusion restriction (p = 0.01 (51 patients) to 0.53 (52 patients)) were regarded as significantly associated with FNCLCC grade in some of the studies which investigated these features. Most other MRI features were not significant.
    CONCLUSIONS: Several MRI features, such as tumor size, necrosis, peritumoral edema, peritumoral contrast enhancement, intratumoral contrast enhancement, and polycyclic/multilobulated tumor configuration may indicate the malignancy grade of STS. However, further studies are needed to gain consensus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFis)在脊柱关节炎(SpA)患者中显示出显著的益处。在具有持续低疾病活动性的患者中可以考虑逐渐降低TNFi药物,因为在标准剂量下继续使用TNFis可能增加副作用(包括感染)的风险并施加经济负担。然而,尚未确定非活动性疾病的SpA患者的最佳TNFi减量策略。在本研究中,我们调查了逐渐减少的TNFi剂量是否与标准剂量TNFis维持的SpA患者的疾病爆发风险相似.
    方法:MEDLINE,Embase,和Cochrane数据库进行了系统搜索,以检索2023年8月之前发表的随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究,这些研究比较了SpA(包括轴向SpA[axSpA],银屑病关节炎[PsA],和SpA伴IBD)接受标准TNFi剂量的患者和接受锥形剂量TNFi的患者。直接检索或计算赔率比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI),并进行了荟萃分析。使用漏斗图与Begg和Mazumdar等级相关/Egger回归方法评估偏差。
    结果:在12项研究(9项随机对照试验和3项观察性研究)中检索到的2,237例SpA患者中,1,301接受了标准的TNFi剂量,而936名SpA患者接受了TNFi逐渐减少。其中,216(16.6%)标准剂量TNFi和217(23.2%)TNF逐渐减少的患者出现疾病发作。与标准剂量患者相比,TNFi逐渐减少的患者疾病发作的合并OR为1.601(95%CI1.276-2.008)。漏斗图显示无发表偏倚。
    结论:与将SpA患者维持在标准TNF剂量相比,TNFi逐渐减少的策略与疾病发作风险显著增加相关。需要进一步的研究来确定哪些患者可以安全地接受TNFi的逐渐减少,并制定安全的逐渐减少策略。
    BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) have shown dramatic benefit in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). Tapering of TNFi medication may be considered in patients with sustained low disease activity because continued use of TNFis at standard doses may increase the risk of side effects including infections and impose an economic burden. However, the optimal TNFi tapering strategy for SpA patients with inactive disease has not been established. In the present study, we investigated whether tapering TNFi doses is associated with similar risk of disease flare to maintaining SpA patients on TNFis at the standard dosage.
    METHODS: The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systemically searched to retrieve randomized control trials (RCTs) and observational studies published prior to August 2023, that compared disease flare in SpA (including axial SpA [axSpA], psoriatic arthritis [PsA], and SpA with IBD) patients who received standard TNFi doses and those who received a tapered dose of TNFi. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were directly retrieved or calculated, and meta-analyses were performed. Bias was assessed using funnel plots with Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation / Egger\'s regression method.
    RESULTS: Among 2,237 SpA patients in the 12 studies (9 RCTs and 3 observational studies) retrieved, 1,301 received the standard TNFi dose, while 936 SpA patients underwent TNFi tapering. Of these, 216 (16.6%) standard-dose TNFi and 217 (23.2%) TNF-tapering patients experienced disease flares. The pooled OR for disease flare in TNFi-tapering patients was 1.601 (95% CI 1.276 - 2.008) compared with the standard-dose patients. The funnel plot showed no publication bias.
    CONCLUSIONS: The strategy of TNFi tapering was associated with a significantly increased risk of disease flare compared to maintaining SpA patients at the standard TNF dose. Further studies are needed to determine which patients can safely undergo tapering of TNFi and to develop safe tapering strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    老年移民占全球人口的一部分,孤独阻碍了他们对寄主地区的适应。然而,关于孤独感危险因素的综述研究以一般老年人为目标,而不关注老年人移民.因此,本研究系统回顾并综合了影响老年移民孤独感的因素。
    搜索并筛选了五个数据库,以进行定量研究,调查老年移民(50岁以上)的危险因素与孤独感之间的关系。最后,共包括35篇文章。
    与老年人移民的孤独感相关的因素被合成为社会人口统计学,身体健康,心理,人际关系,和文化适应相关因素。在一些危险因素中发现了与孤独感的一致显著关系,包括没有配偶,主观财务状况低,自评健康状况差,不良的心理状态,很少有非亲属关系,亲属和非亲属关系质量低,以及对一个民族或东道国民族的归属感较弱。
    这篇综述讨论了关于老年人移民孤独感风险因素的独特发现。此外,目前关于老年移民孤独的文献有一些研究空白,要求进行严格设计的纵向研究。
    UNASSIGNED: Older-adult migrants constitute a proportion of the global population, and loneliness hinders their adaptation to host areas. However, review studies on risk factors for loneliness target general older-adults without focusing on older-adult migrants. Therefore, this study systematically reviews and synthesizes the factors influencing the loneliness of older-adult migrants.
    UNASSIGNED: Five databases were searched and screened for quantitative studies investigating the relationship between risk factors and loneliness among older-adult migrants (over age 50). Finally, 35 articles were included.
    UNASSIGNED: Factors related to loneliness in older-adult migrants were synthesized into sociodemographic, physical health, psychological, interpersonal, and acculturation-related factors. Consistent significant relationships with loneliness were found for a few risk factors, including not having spouses, low subjective financial status, poor self-rated health, poor psychological status, few non-kin ties, low quality of kin and non-kin ties, and a weak sense of belonging to either one\'s ethnic group or that of the host areas.
    UNASSIGNED: This review discusses the unique findings on the risk factors for loneliness in older-adult migrants. Additionally, the current literature on loneliness in older-adult migrants has some research gaps, calling for longitudinal studies with a rigorous design.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    确定原因不明的晕厥的根本原因对于适当管理复发性晕厥发作至关重要。植入式环路记录仪(ILR)已成为监测无法解释的晕厥患者的有价值的诊断工具。然而,ILR和原因不明的晕厥患者需要起搏器的预测因素尚不清楚.在这项研究中,我们阐明了这些预后因素.PubMed/MEDLINE,EMBASE,WebofScience,和CochraneCENTRAL进行了系统搜索,直到2023年5月4日。包括评估植入式环形记录仪和无法解释的晕厥患者起搏器需求预测因素的研究。“预后研究质量”评估工具用于质量评估。计算具有95%置信区间(CI)的合并比值比(OR)。使用Egger和Begg的测试来评估发表偏差。包括10项研究(n=4200)。右束支传导阻滞(OR:3.264;95%CI:1.907-5.588,p<.0001)和双束传导阻滞(OR:2.969;95%CI:1.859-4.742,p<.0001)是起搏器植入的最强预测因子。房颤患者的起搏器需求超过2倍,窦性心动过缓和一级房室传导阻滞。心脏瓣膜病,糖尿病,起搏器植入患者的高血压也明显增多。需要起搏器的患者的年龄(标准化平均差[SMD]:0.560;95%CI:0.410/0.710,p<.0001)和PR间期(SMD:0.351;95%CI:0.150/0.553,p=.001)明显更高。心脏传导障碍,房性心律失常和潜在的医疗状况是不明原因晕厥患者安装环路记录仪后植入起搏器装置的主要预测因素。
    Identifying the underlying cause of unexplained syncope is crucial for appropriate management of recurrent syncopal episodes. Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) have emerged as valuable diagnostic tools for monitoring patients with unexplained syncope. However, the predictors of pacemaker requirement in patients with ILR and unexplained syncope remain unclear. In this study, we shed light on these prognostic factors. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL were systematically searched until May 04, 2023. Studies that evaluated the predictors of pacemaker requirement in patients with implantable loop recorder and unexplained syncope were included. The \"Quality In Prognosis Studies\" appraisal tool was used for quality assessment. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated. The publication bias was evaluated using Egger\'s and Begg\'s tests. Ten studies (n = 4200) were included. Right bundle branch block (OR: 3.264; 95% CI: 1.907-5.588, p < .0001) and bifascicular block (OR: 2.969; 95% CI: 1.859-4.742, p < .0001) were the strongest predictors for pacemaker implantation. Pacemaker requirement was more than two times in patients with atrial fibrillation, sinus bradycardia and first degree AV block. Valvular heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension were also significantly more in patients with pacemaker implantation. Age (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.560; 95% CI: 0.410/0.710, p < .0001) and PR interval (SMD: 0.351; 95% CI: 0.150/0.553, p = .001) were significantly higher in patients with pacemaker requirement. Heart conduction disorders, atrial arrhythmias and underlying medical conditions are main predictors of pacemaker device implantation following loop recorder installation in unexplained syncopal patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心理干预已证明在治疗围产期抑郁症(PND)方面有效,但是理解谁,在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),它们如何以及在什么条件下改善症状在很大程度上是未知的。这篇综述旨在综合当前关于预测因子的知识,在LMIC中治疗PND的心理治疗的主持人和调停者。搜索了五个数据库,以定量检查至少一个介体的效果,LMIC中PND治疗的调节剂或预测因子。该综述抽样了七份出版物,评估了在亚洲和撒哈拉以南非洲进行的随机试验的结果。纳入的研究数量少限制了研究结果的普遍性。对具有可接受质量的试验的分析表明,巴基斯坦的患者激活和印度和巴基斯坦的社会支持可能会介导心理治疗的有效性,在南非,较高的基线抑郁严重程度可能会缓解治疗反应,在印度,基线时更短的抑郁持续时间可能会减轻干预反应。这篇综述强调了目前在证据质量方面的差距,以及未来的试验探索LMIC中PND心理治疗有效性的必要性,以遵循报告指南,以促进适当的预测。主持人和调解人分析。
    Psychological interventions have demonstrated effectiveness in treating perinatal depression (PND), but understanding for whom, how and under what conditions they improve symptoms in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is largely unknown. This review aims to synthesise current knowledge about predictors, moderators and mediators of psychological therapies to treat PND in LMICs. Five databases were searched for studies quantitatively examining the effects of at least one mediator, moderator or predictor of therapies for PND in LMICs. The review sampled seven publications evaluating findings from randomised trials conducted in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. The small number of included studies limited generalisability of findings. Analyses of trials with acceptable quality suggest that patient activation in Pakistan and social support in both India and Pakistan may mediate psychotherapy effectiveness, higher baseline depression severity may moderate treatment response in South Africa, and shorter depression duration at baseline may moderate intervention response in India. This review highlights current gaps in evidence quality and the need for future trials exploring PND psychotherapy effectiveness in LMICs to follow reporting guidelines to facilitate appropriate predictor, moderator and mediator analyses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号