背景:在非洲,在公共医疗诊所提供艾滋病毒暴露前预防(PrEP)受到人员不足的挑战,人满为患,和艾滋病毒相关的耻辱,通常导致客户对PrEP的吸收和延续较低。让客户可以选择在附近的私人药店补充PrEP,它们通常更方便,等待时间更短,可以解决这些挑战并改善PrEP的延续。
方法:这项混合方法研究使用了解释性序贯设计。在Kiambu县的两家公共诊所,肯尼亚,≥18年开始PrEP的客户可以选择在他们免费开始的诊所或在附近三家私人药店中的一家以300肯尼亚先令(~3美元)的价格续杯PrEP。这些药房的提供者(药剂师和制药技师)接受了PrEP服务交付方面的培训,使用处方清单和提供者辅助的艾滋病毒自我检测,两者都有远程临床医生的监督。客户被跟踪了七个月,一次预定的补充访问,四,还有七个月.主要结果是选择基于药物的PrEP续药和PrEP续药。试点完成后,完成了与重新填充PrEP的客户的15次深度访谈(IDI)。我们使用描述性统计和主题分析来评估研究结果。
结果:从2020年11月到2021年11月,筛选了125名PrEP客户,并注册了106名。大多数(59%,63/106)的客户是女性,平均年龄为31岁(IQR26-38岁)。超过292个月的客户随访,41个客户(39%)补充PrEP;参与药房只有3个(3%)。所有完成IDI的客户都在诊所补充PrEP。客户不在药房续杯PrEP的原因包括:偏爱诊所提供的PrEP服务(即预先存在的关系,访问其他服务),对药房提供的PrEP服务的担忧(即,不信任,低质量的护理,费用),并且缺乏对这个笔芯位置的了解。
结论:这些发现表明,在肯尼亚的公共诊所发起PrEP的客户可能已经克服了诊所提供PrEP服务的障碍,并且更喜欢在那里使用PrEP。为了接触到可以从PrEP中受益的新人群,可能需要独立模式的药房提供的PrEP服务。
背景:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT04558554[注册:2020年6月5日]。
BACKGROUND: In Africa, the delivery of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) at public healthcare clinics is challenged by understaffing, overcrowding, and HIV-associated stigma, often resulting in low PrEP uptake and continuation among clients. Giving clients the option to refill PrEP at nearby private pharmacies, which are often more convenient and have shorter wait times, may address these challenges and improve PrEP continuation.
METHODS: This mixed methods
study used an explanatory sequential design. At two public clinics in Kiambu County, Kenya, clients ≥ 18 years initiating PrEP were given the option to refill PrEP at the clinic where they initiated for free or at one of three nearby private pharmacies for 300 Kenyan Shillings (~ $3 US Dollars). The providers at these pharmacies (pharmacists and pharmaceutical technologists) were trained in PrEP service delivery using a prescribing checklist and provider-assisted HIV self-testing, both with remote clinician oversight. Clients were followed up to seven months, with scheduled refill visits at one, four, and seven months. The primary outcomes were selection of pharmacy-based PrEP refills and PrEP continuation. Following pilot completion, 15 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with clients who refilled PrEP were completed. We used descriptive statistics and thematic analysis to assess
study outcomes.
RESULTS: From November 2020 to November 2021, 125 PrEP clients were screened and 106 enrolled. The majority (59%, 63/106) of clients were women and the median age was 31 years (IQR 26-38 years). Over 292 client-months of follow-up, 41 clients (39%) refilled PrEP; only three (3%) at a participating pharmacy. All clients who completed IDIs refilled PrEP at clinics. The reasons why clients did not refill PrEP at pharmacies included: a preference for clinic-delivered PrEP services (i.e., pre-existing relationships, access to other services), concerns about pharmacy-delivered PrEP services (i.e., mistrust, lower quality care, costs), and lack of knowledge of this refill location.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that clients who initiate PrEP at public clinics in Kenya may have already overcome barriers to clinic-delivered PrEP services and prefer PrEP access there. To reach new populations that could benefit from PrEP, a stand-alone model of pharmacy-delivered PrEP services may be needed.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04558554 [registered: June 5, 2020].