BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most prevalent female endocrinopathy. Although increased cardiovascular risk factors are well established for the syndrome, PCOS remains overlooked within the realm of cardiology. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the risk of clinical cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in women with PCOS to inform the 2023 International Evidence-Based PCOS Guideline.
RESULTS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted comparing the risk of clinical CVD events in women with and without PCOS. Medline (Ovid), PsycInfo (Ovid), EMBASE, All EBM (Ovid), and CINAHL were searched from January 1, 2017, until March 1, 2023, to update the 2018 PCOS Guideline. Pooled odds ratios (ORs), incidence rate ratios (IRRs), and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated. Twenty studies involving 1.06 million women (369 317 with PCOS and 692 963 without PCOS) were included. PCOS was associated with higher risk of composite CVD (OR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.26-2.23]; I2 = 71.0%), composite ischemic heart disease (OR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.07-2.05]; I2 = 81.0%), myocardial infarction (OR, 2.50 [95% CI, 1.43-4.38]; I2 = 83.3%), and stroke (OR, 1.71 [95% CI, 1.20-2.44]; I2 = 81.4%). The relationship with cardiovascular mortality was less clear (OR, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.53-2.69]; I2 = 0%). Meta-analyses of IRRs support these findings. Results from pooled HRs were limited by the small number of studies and significant heterogeneity.
CONCLUSIONS: This review provides evidence and highlights the importance of recognizing PCOS as a significant risk factor for CVD morbidity. The 2023 International Evidence-Based PCOS Guideline now recommends awareness of increased CVD risk and comprehensive risk assessment in PCOS to help mitigate the burden of CVD in this common and high-risk condition.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: What are the characteristics of adolescents diagnosed with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) based on the 2003 Rotterdam criteria, but who do not meet the diagnosis according to the international evidence-based guideline?
CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents who had features of PCOS but did not meet the evidence-based guideline adolescent criteria exhibited unfavorable metabolic profiles compared to controls and shared considerable metabolic and hormonal features with adolescents who did meet the adolescent criteria.
BACKGROUND: The international evidence-based PCOS guideline recommended that ultrasound should not be used for the diagnosis of PCOS in girls with a gynecological age of <8 years. Thus far, few studies have evaluated the clinical characteristics of the girls diagnosed with PCOS based on the Rotterdam criteria but who do not meet the diagnosis according to the updated guideline.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study, and subjects attended for care from 2004 to 2022.
METHODS: Adolescent girls with PCOS diagnosed according to the 2003 Rotterdam criteria and healthy controls. All participants were between 2 and 8 years since menarche.
RESULTS: Of the 315 girls diagnosed with PCOS according to the Rotterdam criteria, those with irregular menstruation (IM)/hyperandrogenism (HA)/polycystic ovary (PCO), IM/HA, HA/PCO, and IM/PCO phenotypes accounted for 206 (65.4%), 30 (9.5%), 12 (3.8%), and 67 (21.3%) participants, respectively. According to the evidence-based guideline, 79 girls (25.1%) with the HA/PCO or IM/PCO phenotypes were not diagnosed with PCOS, and aligned to the international guideline; they were designated as the \'at-risk\' group. As expected, the girls meeting the evidence-based guideline adolescent criteria showed the worst metabolic profiles (degree of generalized or central obesity, frequency of insulin resistance, prediabetes or diabetes, and metabolic syndrome) and higher hirsutism scores than the at-risk group or controls. Approximately 90% of the at-risk group were not overweight or obese, which was similar to the controls. However, they showed worse metabolic profiles, with higher blood pressure, triglyceride, and insulin resistance parameters than controls; furthermore, these profiles were similar to those of the girls meeting the adolescent criteria. The at-risk group showed similarly elevated serum LH levels and LH/FSH ratio with the girls meeting adolescent criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: We could not evaluate hormonal or ultrasound parameters in controls.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the conventional Rotterdam criteria, the recent international evidence-based guideline-avoiding ultrasound in PCOS diagnosis in adolescents-still gives the opportunity to identify young girls at risk, aligned to the findings in this study. A practical approach to this adolescent population would involve establishing IM or HA (with ultrasound not indicated) and designating \'at-risk\' PCOS status with regular check-ups for newly developed or worsening PCOS-related symptoms or metabolic abnormalities, with subsequent reassessment including ultrasound or anti-Müllerian hormone, once 8 years post-menarche.
BACKGROUND: No funding was received in support of this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
BACKGROUND: N/A.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of anti-obesity agents for hormonal, reproductive, metabolic, and psychological outcomes in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) to inform the 2023 update of the International Evidence-based Guideline on PCOS. We searched Medline, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and CINAHL until July 2022 with a 10-year limit to focus on newer agents. Eleven trials (545 and 451 participants in intervention and control arms respectively, 12 comparisons) were included. On descriptive analyses, most agents improved anthropometric outcomes; liraglutide, semaglutide and orlistat appeared superior to placebo for anthropometric outcomes. Meta-analyses were possible for two comparisons (exenatide vs. metformin and orlistat + combined oral contraceptive pill [COCP] vs. COCP alone). On meta-analysis, no differences were identified between exenatide versus metformin for anthropometric, biochemical hyperandrogenism, and metabolic outcomes, other than lower fasting blood glucose more with metformin than exenatide (MD: 0.10 mmol/L, CI 0.02-0.17, I2 = 18%, 2 trials). Orlistat + COCP did not improve metabolic outcomes compared with COCP alone (fasting insulin MD: -8.65 pmol/L, -33.55 to 16.26, I2 = 67%, 2 trials). Published data examining the effects of anti-obesity agents in women with PCOS are very limited. The role of these agents in PCOS should be a high priority for future research.

BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance is common in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Inositol may have insulin sensitizing effects; however, its efficacy in the management of PCOS remains indeterminate.
OBJECTIVE: To inform the 2023 international evidence-based guidelines in PCOS, this systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of inositol, alone or in combination with other therapies, in the management of PCOS.
METHODS: Medline, PsycInfo, EMBASE, All EBM, and CINAHL from inception until August 2022.
METHODS: Thirty trials (n = 2230; 1093 intervention, 1137 control), with 19 pooled in meta-analyses were included.
METHODS: Data were extracted for hormonal, metabolic, lipids, psychological, anthropometric, reproductive outcomes, and adverse effects by 1 reviewer, independently verified by a second.
RESULTS: Thirteen comparisons were assessed, with 3 in meta-analyses. Evidence suggests benefits for myo-inositol or D-chiro-inositol (DCI) for some metabolic measures and potential benefits from DCI for ovulation, but inositol may have no effect on other outcomes. Metformin may improve waist-hip ratio and hirsutism compared to inositol, but there is likely no difference for reproductive outcomes, and the evidence is very uncertain for body mass indexI. Myo-inositol likely causes fewer gastrointestinal adverse events compared with metformin; however, these are typically mild and self-limited.
CONCLUSIONS: The evidence supporting the use of inositol in the management of PCOS is limited and inconclusive. Clinicians and their patients should consider the uncertainty of the evidence together with individual values and preferences when engaging in shared decision-making regarding the use of inositol for PCOS.

多囊卵巢综合征（PCOS）是生殖内分泌领域研究最活跃的疾病。伴随对PCOS的深入认知，诊治手段也不断丰富，从单纯性症状描述出发到目前循证证据的不断涌现，PCOS诊治的近百年历史是人类认知疾病的缩影。《2023年国际基于循证医学证据多囊卵巢综合征指南》的更新，促使单一妇科诊疗模式，向多学科协作、全生命周期、多方案、动态更新的诊疗模式转变。本文基于此次更新的指南与第一版以及既往重要的诊治指南对比研读，以期梳理疾病诊治的演变，为临床提供新规范，提升诊治效果，最终使患者获益。.

暂无摘要。

This guideline reviews the etiology, diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hirsutism.
Women with hirsutism.
Three approaches to management include: 1) mechanical hair removal; 2) suppression of androgen production; and 3) androgen receptor blockade.
The main limitations of the management options include the adverse effects, costs, and duration of treatment.
Implementation of the recommendations in this guideline may improve the management of hirsutism in women with this condition. Adverse effects and a potential long duration of treatment are the main drawbacks to initiating treatment, as is the possibility of significant financial costs for certain treatments.
A comprehensive literature review was updated to April 2022, following the same methods as for the prior Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) Hirsutism guidelines. Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date limits, but results were limited to English- or French-language materials.
The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, along with the option of designating a recommendation as a \"good practice point.\" See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations).
Primary care providers, family medicine physicians, obstetricians and gynaecologists, reproductive endocrinologists and others who manage the care of patients with hirsutism.
Management of hirsutism involves a 3-pronged approach of mechanical hair removal, suppression of androgen production, and androgen receptor blockade.
RECOMMENDATIONS.