Pilonidal Sinus

藏号窦
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    藏毛窦(PNS)在年轻男性中很常见。它通常是由骶尾部毛囊皮脂腺阻塞引起的。A型血友病是由VIII因子缺乏引起的出血性疾病。它表现为过度出血,自发或继发于创伤。治疗PNS的主要方法通常是切除鼻窦;然而,最近,激光烧蚀已经开始普遍使用。在这篇文章中,我们介绍了一例年轻的A型血友病男性患者,表现为复发性PNS,激光消融治疗成功,无并发症.
    Pilonidal sinus (PNS) is a common occurrence in young men. It is often caused by blockage of the sebaceous glands in the hair follicles in the sacrococcygeal area. Hemophilia type A is a hemorrhagic disorder caused by a deficiency of factor VIII. It presents with excessive bleeding, either spontaneously or secondary to trauma. The mainstay of treatment for PNS is often excision of the sinus; however, recently, laser ablation has started to be commonly used. In this article, we present a case of a young man with hemophilia A presenting with recurrent PNS successfully managed with laser ablation with no complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:藏毛窦是一种在骶骨区域引起炎症和脓肿并影响青少年和年轻人的疾病。这种情况的病因仍然存在争议。
    方法:观察到一个六岁的男孩在额鼻区有一个包含毛发的孔。他之前有两次感染,并用抗生素治疗。磁共振成像显示无颅骨畸形。在全身麻醉下进行手术,并完全切除藏毛窦。随访时,孩子身体健康。
    在患有额鼻部皮肤异常的儿童中,这种情况突显了皮肤异常可能是藏毛窦的原因。
    结论:在某些情况下,皮肤畸形可能是藏毛窦的根本原因。
    BACKGROUND: Pilonidal sinus is a condition that causes inflammation and abscesses in the sacral region and affects adolescents and young adults. The etiology of this condition remains controversial.
    METHODS: A six year old boy was observed to have an orifice in the frontonasal region which contained hair. He had two previous infections which were treated with antibiotics. Magnetic Resonance Imaging showed no cranial malformations. Surgery was performed under general anesthesia and the pilonidal sinus was completely excised. At follow-up the child was in good health.
    UNASSIGNED: This case in a child with a frontonasal skin anomaly highlights that skin anomalies may be a cause of pilonidal sinus.
    CONCLUSIONS: Skin malformations can be the underlying cause of pilonidal sinus in some cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    在过去的几年中,针对毛发窦疾病(PSD)的非切除技术已越来越受欢迎。这项研究的目的是回顾非切除技术的短期和长期结果,特别关注窦腔内壁治疗的累加效应以及原发性和复发性PSD之间的差异。在Embase进行了系统的搜索,Medline,WebofScience核心合集,Cochrane和GoogleScholar数据库,用于研究PSD的非切除技术,包括带有或不带有额外激光或苯酚处理的凹坑拾取技术,拆除屋顶,内镜技术和凝血酶明胶基质的应用。结果是复发率,治愈率,并发症发生率,伤口愈合时间和恢复日常活动所需的时间。总的来说,包括8100名患者的31项研究。非切除技术的总体治愈率为67%至100%。取坑的复发率,根据后续时间,去屋顶和明胶基质的应用从0到16%不等。附加激光后的复发率,苯酚和内镜技术从0到29%不等。并发症发生率从0到16%不等,伤口愈合时间在3到47天之间。恢复日常活动的时间从一到九天不等。非切除技术与快速恢复和低发病率相关,但复发率高。尝试额外治疗鼻窦内衬的技术比单独进行凹陷摘除的复发率更差。原发性疾病和复发性疾病之间的复发率没有差异。
    Non-excisional techniques for pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) have gained popularity over the last years. The aim of this study was to review short and long-term outcomes for non-excisional techniques with special focus on the additive effect of treatment of the inner lining of the sinus cavity and the difference between primary and recurrent PSD. A systematic search was conducted in Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases for studies on non-excisional techniques for PSD including pit picking techniques with or without additional laser or phenol treatment, unroofing, endoscopic techniques and thrombin gelatin matrix application. Outcomes were recurrence rates, healing rates, complication rates, wound healing times and time taken to return to daily activities. In total, 31 studies comprising 8100 patients were included. Non-excisional techniques had overall healing rates ranging from 67 to 100%. Recurrence rates for pit picking, unroofing and gelatin matrix application varied from 0 to 16% depending on the follow-up time. Recurrence rates after additional laser, phenol and endoscopic techniques varied from 0 to 29%. Complication rates ranged from 0 to 16%, and the wound healing time was between three and forty-seven days. The return to daily activities varied from one to nine days. Non-excisional techniques are associated with fast recovery and low morbidity but recurrence rates are high. Techniques that attempt to additionally treat the inner lining of the sinus have worse recurrence rates than pit picking alone. Recurrence rates do not differ between primary and recurrent disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    用常规切除技术治疗藏毛窦疾病与高达20%至30%的复发(初次闭合)或可能持续数月的长期愈合(二次意图闭合)相关。内镜鼻窦治疗(EPSiT)越来越受欢迎。本系统评价旨在总结和评估迄今为止报道的儿科EPSiT(PEPSiT)的结果。对所有18岁以下患者的PEPSiT研究进行了系统搜索。关于人口统计,技术,和结果。Fisher检验用于评估成功率/复发率与不同方法之间的关联(纤维镜与膀胱镜,不同的伤口护理方案)。共有320名患者(9项研究,2018-2022年),加权平均年龄为15.7岁,随访时间为13.5个月。PEPSiT在290例患者(90.9%)中成功,加权平均愈合时间为4.1周。29例患者(9.1%)报告复发,加权平均复发时间为4.6个月。结果没有显着改变,通过使用气管镜与小儿膀胱镜(p=1.0),或围手术期激光脱毛(p=0.06),或术后定期剃须,脱毛膏,光脉冲,或激光(p=0.31)。加权平均手术时间为38分钟,住院时间为16小时。现有证据的总结证实PEPSiT是安全有效的。加上它的非侵入性,PEPSiT的汇总结果似乎优于许多常规技术。与传统技术相比,特别是脱离中线皮瓣和半闭合程序,是,然而,缺乏。PEPSiT的优越性需要在未来的比较研究中得到证实,包括成本效益分析。
    Treatment of pilonidal sinus disease with conventional excision techniques is associated with recurrence up to 20 to 30% (primary closure) or with prolonged healing that might last months (closure by secondary intention). Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT) is gaining increasing popularity. This systematic review aims to summarize and evaluate the reported outcomes of pediatric EPSiT (PEPSiT) to date. Systematic search was performed for all studies on PEPSiT in patients younger than 18 years, pertaining to demographics, technique, and outcomes. Fisher\'s test was used to assess the associations between success/recurrence rates and different approaches (fistuloscope vs. cystoscope, different wound care protocols). A total of 320 patients (9 studies, 2018-2022) with a weighted mean age of 15.7 years and follow-up duration of 13.5 months were included. PEPSiT was successful in 290 patients (90.9%) with weighted mean time to healing of 4.1 weeks. Recurrence was reported in 29 patients (9.1%) with weighted mean time to recurrence of 4.6 months. Outcomes were not significantly altered by the use of fistuloscope versus pediatric cystoscope (p = 1.0), or with perioperative laser epilation (p = 0.06), or postoperative regular shaving, depilatory creams, light pulse, or laser (p = 0.31). The weighted mean operative time was 38 minutes and hospital stay was 16 hours. Summary of available evidence confirms that PEPSiT is safe and effective. Added to its noninvasiveness, PEPSiT\'s pooled outcomes appear superior to those of numerous conventional techniques. Comparison with conventional techniques, particularly off-midline flap and semi-closure procedures, is, however, lacking. The superiority of PEPSiT needs to be confirmed in future comparative studies, including cost-benefit analysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    由于高复发率和与治疗相关的发病率,藏毛疾病的治疗仍然是一个挑战。
    在藏毛疾病的管理中使用的治疗方式多种多样,临床医生之间的实践差异很大。可用的治疗方案在侵袭水平上差异很大,相关的发病率和残疾,并发症的风险,以及预防疾病复发的有效性。保守的非手术管理策略,包括持续改善卫生状况,脱毛,和生活方式的改变,专注于疾病预防和疾病活动的最小化。使用激光和强脉冲光疗法的脱毛技术也用作主要和辅助治疗方式。其他非手术治疗方式包括苯酚和纤维蛋白注射以促进毛囊窦的闭合。传统的藏毛疾病的手术管理策略包括切除受影响的组织,并进行各种闭合类型,包括主要的中线闭合。初级离线闭合技术(即,Karydakis皮瓣,林伯格皮瓣,巴斯科姆裂缝升降机),并通过次要意图治愈。最近已经转向更微创的手术方法,包括窦切除术(即,钻孔或Gips程序)和内窥镜入路。总的来说,目前支持不同治疗方案的证据受到以下因素的限制:研究质量对疾病严重程度的表征不一致,变量定义的使用以及研究中治疗相关结局的报告.
    人皮病与显著的身体和社会心理发病率相关。最佳治疗将使疾病和治疗相关的发病率降至最低。需要对用于表征藏毛疾病及其结果的定义进行标准化,以开发基于证据的治疗算法。
    The management of pilonidal disease continues to be a challenge due to high rates of recurrence and treatment-associated morbidity.
    There is a heterogeneous repertoire of treatment modalities used in the management of pilonidal disease and wide practice variation among clinicians. Available treatment options vary considerably in their level of invasiveness, associated morbidity and disability, risks of complications, and effectiveness at preventing disease recurrence. Conservative nonoperative management strategies, including persistent improved hygiene, depilation, and lifestyle modification, focus on disease prevention and minimization of disease activity. Epilation techniques using both laser and intense pulse light therapy are also used as primary and adjunct treatment modalities. Other nonoperative treatment modalities include phenol and fibrin injection to promote closure of pilonidal sinuses. The traditional operative management strategy for pilonidal disease involves excision of affected tissue paired with a variety of closure types including primary midline closure, primary off-midline closure techniques (ie, Karydakis flap, Limberg flap, Bascom cleft lift), and healing by secondary intention. There has been a recent shift toward more minimally invasive operative approaches including sinusectomy (ie, trephination or Gips procedure) and endoscopic approaches. Overall, the current evidence supporting the different treatment options is limited by study quality with inconsistent characterization of disease severity and use of variable definitions and reporting of treatment-associated outcomes across studies.
    Pilonidal disease is associated with significant physical and psychosocial morbidity. Optimal treatments will minimize disease and treatment-associated morbidity. There is a need for standardization of definitions used to characterize pilonidal disease and its outcomes to develop evidence-based treatment algorithms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    激光彻底改变了医疗领域,拓宽诊断和治疗范围,二极管(630-980nm)和Nd:YAG(1064nm)激光是消融程序中的常见选择。激光消融是一种新的微创技术,具有良好的治疗效果,术后发病率低,以及就业后较短的恢复期。本综述研究旨在提供有关激光在毛发窦疾病中的使用及其与其他常规方法相比的有效性的信息。所考虑的文章是通过在PubMed中进行文献检索获得的,科克伦,和谷歌学者,44篇文章被纳入本研究。像鼻窦激光辅助闭合(SiLaC)这样的技术,鼻窦激光治疗(SiLaT),毛发窦激光治疗(PiLaT),纳入并回顾了激光辅助内镜下的藏毛窦治疗(LEPSiT)。二极管激光器是最常用的,局部麻醉优于脊髓或全身麻醉。使用Nd:YAG激光和SiLaT技术观察到最高的愈合率。复发很低,特别是在接受多次手术的患者中。在回顾已发表的文献时,激光消融手术显示较低的发病率和术后并发症。患者满意度较高,发现使用微创技术的总成本较低。将激光与其他外科技术进行比较的长期前瞻性研究将有助于我们确定藏毛窦疾病的未来治疗方式。
    Laser has revolutionized the medical field, broadening the diagnostic and therapeutic spectrum, with diode (630-980 nm) and Nd:YAG (1064 nm) lasers being the common choices in ablation procedures. Laser ablation in pilonidal sinus disease is a new minimally invasive technique with good treatment efficacy, low post-op morbidity, and shorter recovery periods following employment. This review study aimed to provide information on the use of lasers in pilonidal sinus disease and their effectiveness compared to other conventional methods. The articles considered were obtained by performing a literature search in PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar, and 44 articles were included in this study. Techniques like sinus laser-assisted closure (SiLaC), sinus laser therapy (SiLaT), pilonidal sinus laser treatment (PiLaT), and laser-assisted endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (LEPSiT) were included and reviewed. Diode laser was most commonly used, with local anesthesia preferred over spinal or general anesthesia. The highest healing rate was observed with Nd:YAG laser and the SiLaT technique. Recurrence was low, particularly in patients who underwent multiple procedures. On reviewing the published literature, laser ablation procedures showed lower morbidity and post-op complications. Patient satisfaction was higher, and the overall cost was found to be lower with minimally invasive techniques. Long-term prospective studies comparing lasers with other surgical techniques would help us ascertain the future treatment modality of pilonidal sinus disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:藏毛窦(PS)是一种获得性疾病,由反复感染和慢性炎症引起。涉及骶尾囊的PS被称为骶尾囊藏毛窦(SPS)。SPS是一种罕见的慢性传染病,手术是一个很好的选择。近年来,SPS的发病率在世界范围内逐渐增加。然而,外科医生尚未就SPS的首选手术方法达成共识。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以分析不同手术方式治疗SPS的疗效差异。
    方法:在2003年1月1日至2023年2月28日的PubMed数据库中进行了系统搜索。主要结果参数为复发和感染。最后,使用RevMan5.4.1软件进行统计学分析(荟萃分析)。此外,系统回顾了近20年来SPS外科治疗的最新进展,尤其是过去3年的报道。
    结果:27篇文章,54项研究,3,612名参与者被纳入本荟萃分析.中线闭合(MC)技术后的复发率远高于其他技术。在分析的技术中,MC和Limberg襟翼(LF)之间的差异,MC和有袋化(MA)之间有统计学意义(P=0.0002,RR=6.15,95%CI2.40,15.80;P=0.01,RR=12.70,95%CI1.70,95.06)。开放愈合(OH)的复发率高于Karydakis皮瓣(KF)技术,差异有统计学意义(P=0.02,RR=6.04,95%CI1.37,26.55)。将MC与其他技术进行比较的大多数结果表明,前者的感染率更高,MC和LF之间的差异有统计学意义(P=0.0005,RR=4.14,95%CI1.86,9.23)。KF和LF的比较,改良Limberg皮瓣(MLF)和KF显示在复发和感染方面差异无统计学意义(P≥0.05)。
    结论:SPS有多种手术治疗方案,包括切口和引流,切除病变组织,进行初次闭合和二次愈合,和微创手术。尚无法确定哪种手术技术应被视为治疗的黄金标准,甚至不同研究人员使用相同操作方法的结果也是相互矛盾的。但可以肯定的是,中线闭合技术比其他技术术后复发和感染的发生率要高得多。因此,肛肠外科医师应在全面评估患者意愿的基础上,制定最适合患者的个体化方案,SPS的外观,和外科医生的专业能力。
    BACKGROUND: A pilonidal sinus (PS) is an acquired disease resulting from recurrent infections and chronic inflammation. A PS involving the sacrococcyx is referred to as a sacrococcygeal PS (SPS). An SPS is a rare chronic infectious disease for which surgery is a good choice. The incidence of SPS has gradually increased worldwide in recent years. However, surgeons have not reached a consensus on the preferred surgical approach for SPS. The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze differences in the efficacy of different surgical approaches for the treatment of SPS.
    METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed database covering the period from 1 January 2003, to 28 February 2023. The primary outcome parameters were recurrence and infection. Finally, statistical analysis (meta-analysis) was carried out using RevMan 5.4.1 software. In addition, we systematically reviewed the latest progress in the surgical treatment of SPS over the past 20 years, especially as reported in the past 3 years.
    RESULTS: Twenty-seven articles, 54 studies, and 3612 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The recurrence rate following the midline closure (MC) technique was much higher than that of other techniques. Among the techniques analyzed, the differences between MC and Limberg flap (LF), and between MC and marsupialization were statistically significant [ P =0.0002, risk ratio (RR)=6.15, 95% CI 2.40, 15.80; P =0.01, RR=12.70, 95% CI 1.70, 95.06]. The recurrence rate of open healing was higher than that of the Karydakis flap (KF) technique, and the difference was statistically significant ( P =0.02, RR=6.04, 95% CI 1.37, 26.55). Most of the results comparing MC with other techniques suggested that the former had a higher infection rate, and the difference between MC and LF was statistically significant ( P =0.0005, RR=4.14, 95% CI 1.86, 9.23). Comparison between KF and LF, modified LF and KF showed that the differences were not statistically significant in terms of recurrence and infection ( P ≥0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: There are various surgical treatment options for SPS, including incision and drainage, excision of diseased tissue with primary closure and secondary healing, and minimally invasive surgery. It is still not possible to determine which surgical technique should be considered the gold standard for treatment, as even the results of different researchers using the same operation method are conflicting. But what is certain is that the midline closure technique has a much higher incidence of postoperative recurrence and infection than other techniques. Therefore, the anorectal surgeon should formulate the most suitable individualized plan for the patient based on a comprehensive evaluation of the patient\'s wishes, appearance of the SPS, and the professional ability of the surgeon.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:藏毛窦病(PSD)是一种常见的炎症性疾病。在过去的几年中,儿科患者的PSD管理发生了巨大变化,尤其是在涉及最新的微创技术时。本文旨在确定有关不同技术在儿童PSD管理中的可靠性的临床证据。材料和方法:我们对过去10年发表的文章进行了PubMed搜索,使用关键字\"pilonidal,\"\"鼻窦,\"\"疾病,\"\"儿科,\"\"手术,\"和\"儿童。结果:我们汇集了38项研究,其中18个被排除在外,因为它们要么不相关,要么与成年人口无关。结论:文献分析表明,内镜下PSD技术在耐受性和术后条件方面优于切除和原发性闭合(EPC),随着对此事的研究越来越多,伤口愈合时间和住院时间等重要终点将被证明是优越的。即使从统计学的角度来看,儿科内镜下的毛发病治疗也是一种非常有希望的替代方法。特别是考虑到在这个群体中,研究似乎更扎实。文献分析表明,微创技术在复发和并发症方面在统计学上优于EPC。
    Background: Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is a common inflammatory disease. PSD management in pediatric patients changed dramatically in the last few years especially when concerning the latest minimally invasive techniques. This article aims to identify clinical evidence about the reliability of the different techniques in managing PSD in children. Materials and Methods: We performed a PubMed search for articles published during the last 10 years, using the keywords \"pilonidal,\" \"sinus,\" \"disease,\" \"pediatric,\" \"surgery,\" and \"children.\" Results: We pooled 38 studies, 18 of these were excluded because they were either not relevant or concerned an adult population. Conclusions: Literature analysis shows that endoscopic techniques for PSD are superior to excision and primary closure (EPC) in terms of tolerance and postoperative conditions and, with the growing number of studies in the matter, important endpoints such as wound healing time and length of hospital stay will be proved to be superior. Pediatric Endoscopic pilonidal disease treatment showed to be a very promising alternative even from a statistical point of view, especially when considered that in this group, studies seemed to be more solid. Literature analysis showed that minimally invasive techniques were statistically superior to EPC in terms of recurrence and complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:藏毛病是臀裂区的常见病,但很少报道会阴前受累。臀裂疾病的手术选择包括简单的瘘管切开术,初次闭合的切除手术(即,巴斯科姆裂口电梯,Karydakis和Limberg襟翼),或二次愈合切除。此处描述的Bascom裂口抬举是一种切除程序,涉及旋转襟翼,并带有中线闭合。对深部组织进行抢救,以适当地勾勒臀裂的轮廓,产生美观的结果。
    方法:一名20岁的男性复发性臀裂藏毛脓肿,接受了Bascom裂抬举手术,以明确治疗他的疾病。在手术过程中,发现了会阴前受累。鉴于凹坑相对于襟翼的位置,会阴前部疾病仅通过从凹坑内去除毛发并修剪会阴的毛发来治疗。
    结论:虽然这个案例突出了目前的治疗标准和手术选择,对于罕见的会阴前部藏毛疾病,理想的手术选择仍有待确定。
    Pilonidal disease is a common condition of the gluteal cleft region, but involvement of the anterior perineum is rarely reported. Surgical options for gluteal cleft disease include simple fistulotomy, excisional procedures with primary closure (ie, Bascom cleft lift, Karydakis and Limberg flaps), or excision with secondary healing. The Bascom cleft lift described here is an excisional procedure involving a rotational flap with an off-midline closure. Deep tissue is salvaged allowing for proper contouring of the gluteal cleft, resulting in a cosmetically pleasing result.
    A 20-year-old man with recurrent pilonidal abscesses of the gluteal cleft underwent a Bascom cleft lift procedure for definitive care of his disease. During the procedure, involvement of the anterior perineum was found. Given the location of the pits relative to the flap, the anterior perineal disease was treated only with removal of hair from within the pits and clipping the hair of the perineum.
    While this case highlights the current standard of care and surgical options for pilonidal disease, the ideal surgical options for rare cases of pilonidal disease of the anterior perineum remain to be determined.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号