目的:“脑颈样走廊”涵盖了一系列方法,这些方法使用颞骨作为治疗小管内病变的目标或作为进入内耳道(IAC)的途径,颈静脉孔,或者脑干.多年来,复杂的大脑样方法得到了不断的发展和完善,导致他们的定义和描述存在很大的异质性。由于在侧颅底手术中普遍使用乙状结肠走廊,需要一个简单的基于解剖学和自我解释的分类来描绘不同类型的乙状结肠途径的手术视角。在这里,作者对文献进行了范围审查,目的是提出一种用于脑膜方法的分类系统。
方法:PubMed,EMBASE,Scopus,和WebofScience数据库从开始到2022年12月9日进行了搜索,遵循PRISMA扩展范围审查指南,包括报告使用“独立”的临床研究。根据解剖走廊总结了研究结果,轨迹,和目标病变,以分类不同变体的乙状结肠入路。
结果:纳入了九十九项临床研究进行分析,最常见的靶病变是前庭神经鞘瘤(60/99,60.6%)和岩斜区脑膜瘤(12/99,12.1%)。所有方法都有一个共同的进入途径(即,乳突切除术),但根据它们与迷宫的关系分为两大类:经迷宫或前走廊(80/99,80.8%)和后迷宫或后走廊(20/99,20.2%)。根据骨切除的程度,前走廊包括5种变化:1)部分经迷路(5/99,5.1%),2)转齿(2/99,2.0%),3)经迷路(61/99,61.6%),4)交离子(5/99,5.1%),5)转耳蜗(17/99,17.2%)。后走廊由基于目标区域和轨迹相对于IAC的4个变化组成:6)后迷路次内(6/99,6.1%),7)迷走神经逆行穿甲(19/99,19.2%),8)鼻上迷路后(1/99,1.0%),和9)反迷宫式特劳特曼三角形(2/99,2.0%)。
结论:随着微创技术的扩展,Presigmoid入路变得越来越复杂。使用现有命名法的这些方法的描述可能是不精确的或令人困惑的。因此,作者提出了一种基于手术解剖的综合分类,明确地描述了脑前肌的方法,准确地说,并且高效。
The \"presigmoid corridor\" covers a spectrum of approaches using the petrous temporal bone either as a target in treating intracanalicular lesions or as a route to access the internal auditory canal (IAC), jugular foramen, or brainstem. Complex presigmoid approaches have been continuously developed and refined over the years, leading to great heterogeneity in their definitions and descriptions. Owing to the common use of the presigmoid corridor in lateral skull base surgery, a simple anatomy-based and self-explanatory classification is needed to delineate the operative perspective of the different variants of the presigmoid route. Herein, the authors conducted a scoping
review of the literature with the aim of proposing a classification system for presigmoid approaches.
The PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to December 9, 2022, following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines to include clinical studies reporting the use of \"stand-alone\" presigmoid approaches. Findings were summarized based on the anatomical corridor, trajectory, and target lesions to classify the different variants of the presigmoid approach.
Ninety-nine clinical studies were included for analysis, and the most common target lesions were vestibular schwannomas (60/99, 60.6%) and petroclival meningiomas (12/99, 12.1%). All approaches had a common entry pathway (i.e., mastoidectomy) but were differentiated into two main categories based on their relationship to the labyrinth: translabyrinthine or anterior corridor (80/99, 80.8%) and retrolabyrinthine or posterior corridor (20/99, 20.2%). The anterior corridor comprised 5 variations based on the extent of bone resection: 1) partial translabyrinthine (5/99, 5.1%), 2) transcrusal (2/99, 2.0%), 3) translabyrinthine proper (61/99, 61.6%), 4) transotic (5/99, 5.1%), and 5) transcochlear (17/99, 17.2%). The posterior corridor consisted of 4 variations based on the target area and trajectory in relation to the IAC: 6) retrolabyrinthine inframeatal (6/99, 6.1%), 7) retrolabyrinthine transmeatal (19/99, 19.2%), 8) retrolabyrinthine suprameatal (1/99, 1.0%), and 9) retrolabyrinthine trans-Trautman\'s triangle (2/99, 2.0%).
Presigmoid approaches are becoming increasingly complex with the expansion of minimally invasive techniques. Descriptions of these approaches using the existing nomenclature can be imprecise or confusing. Therefore, the authors propose a comprehensive classification based on the operative anatomy that unequivocally describes presigmoid approaches simply, precisely, and efficiently.