Percutaneous coronary intervention, a common treatment for atherosclerotic coronary artery lesions, occasionally results in perforations associated with increased mortality rates. Stents coated with a bioresorbable polymer membrane may offer an effective solution for sealing coronary artery perforations. Additionally, such coatings could be effective in mitigating neointimal hyperplasia within the vascular lumen and correcting symptomatic aneurysms. This study examines polymer membranes fabricated by electrospinning of polycaprolactone, polydioxanone, polylactide-co-caprolactone, and polylactide-co-glycolide. In uniaxial tensile tests, all the materials appear to surpass theoretically derived elongation thresholds necessary for stent deployment, albeit polydioxanone membranes are found to disintegrate during the experimental balloon expansion. As revealed by in vitro hemocompatibility testing, polylactide-co-caprolactone membranes exhibit higher thrombogenicity compared to other evaluated polymers, while polylactide-co-glycolide samples fail within the first day post-implantation into the abdominal aorta in rats. The PCL membrane exhibited significant water leakage in the permeability test. Comprehensive evaluation of mechanical testing, bio- and hemocompatibility, as well as biodegradation dynamics shows the advantage of membranes based on and the mixture of polylactide-co-caprolactone and polydioxanone over other polymer groups. These findings lay a foundational framework for conducting preclinical studies on stent configurations in large laboratory animals, emphasizing that further investigations under conditions closely mimicking clinical use are imperative for making definitive conclusions.

Children are frequently reported as cases of foreign body ingestion, with fishbone ingestion being particularly prevalent in communities where fish consumption is common. Although many instances of foreign body ingestion resolve spontaneously, the ingestion of sharp objects like fishbones poses a greater risk of morbidity and mortality due to their propensity for causing complications. Furthermore, incidents of foreign body ingestion often present with nonspecific symptoms or may go unnoticed, potentially leading to misdiagnosis and complicating the clinical course. We present a case of a 2-year-old boy initially misdiagnosed with constipation and treated with laxatives due to intermittent progressive abdominal pain. Subsequently, he presented to the emergency department where radiological and laboratory investigations revealed signs of inflammation and localized abdominal fluid collection containing a linear hyperdense object, indicating complicated foreign body ingestion with perforation. Urgent laparotomy revealed an omental abscess, which was excised, and the perforation site was repaired with sutures. This case underscores the risk of misdiagnosis and the importance of timely recognition and management. It also emphasizes the critical role of imaging, particularly computed tomography, in accurate diagnosis and differentiation from other common conditions.

UNASSIGNED: Meckel\'s diverticulitis (MD) mimics acute appendicitis with right lower abdominal pain. Clinicians must consider MD in acute abdomen cases to avoid diagnostic delays. Perforated MD can lead to serious complications. Timely use of advanced imaging and surgical assessment is essential for accurate diagnosis and management.
UNASSIGNED: Meckel\'s diverticulum (MD) is a gastrointestinal congenital anomaly that signifies a persistent remnant of the omphalomesenteric duct. While frequently asymptomatic, its complications vary widely, ranging from mild and painless to potentially life-threatening conditions. This is a case of a 4-year-old female patient with sudden abdominal pain and tenderness, with an elusive cause before surgery. The definitive diagnosis of a perforated MD was established during diagnostic laparoscopy due to worsening symptoms. Detecting MD and its potential complications requires a high degree of suspicion. Once recognized, prompt management is essential to prevent further complications. Although perforation is uncommon in MD, its symptoms can mimic acute appendicitis, confusing emergency settings. This article underscores the significance of diagnosing MD, despite its rarity, and emphasizes the necessity for swift treatment upon identification.

BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic hernia is most commonly congenital; however, it can also be acquired, most often due to trauma. It is a life-threatening condition resulting in abdominal visceral incarceration and subsequent mortality.
METHODS: Our patient was a 27-year-old mother who presented with upper abdominal pain associated with breathlessness. There was no history of trauma. The chest X-ray suggested the diagnosis of a diaphragmatic hernia which was further confirmed on CT. The decision was made to operate on the patient through a laparoscopic approach using single-lung ventilation. A diaphragmatic rent was identified with the incarceration of the stomach and omentum. The rent was widened further which allowed partial reduction of contents and visualization of the left hemithorax which was entirely contaminated. An additional thoracic approach was opted for which enabled reduction of the herniated stomach. A large perforation was present along the greater curvature, which was resected using a linear endo stapler. The diaphragmatic rent was then repaired primarily. Adequate lavage, aspiration, and mopping were performed along with chest tube drainage. The patient remained stable post-operatively.
CONCLUSIONS: An optimal surgical repair along with sound perioperative care is essential for the successful management of diaphragmatic hernia. A minimally invasive approach avoided extensive open surgery and the complications that would come with it for a young nursing mother.
CONCLUSIONS: Such technically challenging cases can be successfully managed with a minimally invasive approach using sound surgical skills and necessary improvisations.

BACKGROUND: There is a discrepancy in the surgical and endoscopic literature for managing duodenal perforations. Although often managed conservatively, surgical repair is the standard treatment for duodenal perforations. This contrasts with the gastroenterology literature, which now recommends endoscopic repair of duodenal perforations, which are more frequently iatrogenic from the growing field of advanced endoscopic procedures. This study aims to provide a scoping review to summarize the current literature content and quality on endoscopic repair of duodenal perforations.
METHODS: The protocol for performing this scoping review was outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute. All studies that reported primary outcomes of patients who had undergone endoscopic repair of duodenal perforations before February 2022, regardless of perforation etiology or repair type were reviewed, with studies after 1999 meeting inclusion criteria. The study excluded articles that did not report clinical outcomes of endoscopic repair, articles that did not describe where in the gastrointestinal tract the endoscopic repair occurred, pediatric patients, and animal studies.
RESULTS: 7606 abstracts were screened, with 474 full articles reviewed and 152 studies met inclusion criteria. 560 patients had duodenal perforations repaired endoscopically, with a technical success rate of 90.4% and a survival rate of 86.7%. Most of these perforations (74.5%) were iatrogenic from endoscopic procedures or surgery. Only one randomized control trial (RCT) was found, and 53% of studies were case reports.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that endoscopic repair could emerge as a viable first-line treatment for duodenal perforation and highlight the need for more high-quality research in this topic.

Peptic ulcer disease refers to a break in the gastric or duodenal mucosal wall extending into the muscular mucosa. Although peptic ulcer disease commonly presents with dyspepsia, about 70% of patients initially present asymptomatically. A perforated peptic ulcer is a life-threatening complication of peptic ulcer disease that has high morbidity and mortality and requires emergent surgery. To prevent complications of peptic ulcer disease, an extensive history, physical examination, and appropriate imaging are required for appropriate management. In addition, the use of appropriate imaging and diagnostic modalities, such as an oral contrast computerized tomography of the abdomen, may lead to emergent treatment if complications arise. We present a unique case of a contained perforated duodenal ulcer within a fistula tract (Ulcère Perforé-Bouché) and diagnostic tools yielding detection and treatment of an Ulcère Perforé-Bouché. Abdominal x-rays may be inadequate the detect Ulcère Perforé-Bouché. However, an oral contract computerized tomography of the abdomen may have greater detection capabilities to diagnose cases of Ulcère Perforé-Bouché.

UNASSIGNED: Over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) are used for treating gastrointestinal perforations, postoperative anastomotic leakages, and mucosal defect closure after endoscopic resections. However, OTSCs are expensive and associated with fatal complications; therefore, proper OTSC usage is necessary. Criteria of OTSC use for mucosal defect closure after duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are scarce. We examined closure outcomes with OTSCs and conventional clips in patients undergoing duodenal ESD, analyzed the resected specimen area, estimated the preoperative size of tumors treated with each method, and attempted to clarify the criteria for the use of OTSCs vs conventional clips.
UNASSIGNED: Endoscopic resection was performed for 133 superficial duodenal epithelial tumors from April 2017 to February 2022. Complete closure of mucosal defects after duodenal ESD was attempted for 82 superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors, divided into OTSC and control (conventional clips used) groups. Closure outcomes were analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: The overall rate of complete mucosal defect closure in both groups was 98.8%. Significant between-group differences existed in the median estimated tumor size and median resected specimen area.
UNASSIGNED: Conventional clips work well for mucosal defects ≤18 mm after duodenal ESD, but for those >18 mm, a combination of OTSCs may be considered.

Introduction One of the most frequent emergencies that a general surgeon deals with is perforation peritonitis. The anatomical site of the perforation, which in turn affects the source of infection, has a major impact on the mortality rate due to perforation peritonitis. Early and suitable antibiotic therapy can be started in the postoperative period with the aid of knowledge about the microbiological profile and sensitivity of peritoneal fluid culture with respect to the anatomical sites of perforation peritonitis. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted from June 2021 to November 2021 where peritoneal fluid samples were collected intraoperatively from patients with perforation peritonitis. This was subjected to culture and sensitivity, and results were analyzed with respect to anatomical sites of perforation. Results Forty cases were investigated. The ileum (30%) was the most common site of perforation, followed by the stomach (22.5%), appendix (20%), duodenum (12.5%), caecum (5%), jejunum (5%), transverse colon (2.5%), and rectum (2.5%). Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Klebsiella spp. were the most frequently found organisms in all sites of perforation peritonitis. The most sensitive antibiotics covering all isolated organisms were amikacin and meropenem. Sensitivity to amikacin was found in 85.18% of cases of E. coli and 84.6% of cases of Klebsiella. Sensitivity to meropenem was found in 76.9% of cases of E. coli and 80% of cases of Klebsiella. Conclusion In patients with perforation peritonitis, the peritoneal fluid cultures did not reflect the major differential normal flora according to the region of the gastrointestinal tract. The most prevalent organism isolated among all the sites of perforation peritonitis was E. coli. Antimicrobial activity against organisms isolated from perforation peritonitis patients was significantly demonstrated by aminoglycosides, piperacillin and tazobactam, and meropenem and colistin, with considerable resistance to third-generation cephalosporins.

Autologous Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is an amalgam of fibrin mesh, platelets and growth factors that favour wound healing. It can be easily used as a graft material in myringoplasty, making it a promising, easy to harvest and cost effective alternative compared to cartilage or fascia graft used in conventional myringoplasty. 50 patients of small to medium, dry central perforation underwent myringoplasty using PRF graft (Group 1). Results were compared to 50 patients with similar small to medium perforations who underwent conventional transcanal myringoplasty using temporalis fascia graft (Group 2): Outcome of surgery was measured by closure of perforation and improvement in hearing at 3 months. In group 1, overall closure rate was 70% while in group 2 it was 96%. For both small and medium perforations healing was significantly higher in group 2 compared to group 1, (100% vs 87.5%) for small perforations and (95.45% vs 66.67%) for medium perforations. Hearing gain was comparable in both groups in patients in whom healing of perforation occurred. PRF stands as a suitable graft material for closure of small perforations, but, lack of rigidity and early disintegration of the graft makes it less suitable for larger perforations compared to other conventional grafts such as temporalis fascia.

Duodenal ulcer perforation in patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery is a rare late complication, occurring in less than 1% of cases. It carries a high mortality risk, particularly in cases of delayed diagnosis. The challenge lies in an unspecific clinical presentation and laboratory findings, as well as a CT scan not very helpful in almost half of cases. These features may lead to the consideration of other differential diagnoses, such as pancreatitis or cholecystitis. A multidisciplinary approach in collaboration with digestive surgeons is essential to enable rapid exploratory laparoscopy in presence of diagnostic uncertainty, and appropriate therapeutic management.
La perforation de l’ulcère duodénal chez un patient ayant subi une chirurgie de bypass gastrique est une complication tardive rare, survenant dans moins de 1 % des cas. Elle présente un risque élevé de mortalité, particulièrement en cas de diagnostic retardé. Le défi réside dans une présentation clinique et des résultats biologiques peu spécifiques, ainsi qu’un scanner peu contributif dans près de la moitié des cas. Ces caractéristiques peuvent conduire à envisager d’autres diagnostics différentiels, tels que la pancréatite ou la cholécystite. Il est essentiel d’adopter une approche multidisciplinaire en collaboration avec les chirurgiens digestifs pour permettre une laparoscopie exploratrice rapide en cas d’incertitude diagnostique, ainsi qu’une prise en charge thérapeutique appropriée.