Children are frequently reported as cases of foreign body ingestion, with fishbone ingestion being particularly prevalent in communities where fish consumption is common. Although many instances of foreign body ingestion resolve spontaneously, the ingestion of sharp objects like fishbones poses a greater risk of morbidity and mortality due to their propensity for causing complications. Furthermore, incidents of foreign body ingestion often present with nonspecific symptoms or may go unnoticed, potentially leading to misdiagnosis and complicating the clinical course. We present a case of a 2-year-old boy initially misdiagnosed with constipation and treated with laxatives due to intermittent progressive abdominal pain. Subsequently, he presented to the emergency department where radiological and laboratory investigations revealed signs of inflammation and localized abdominal fluid collection containing a linear hyperdense object, indicating complicated foreign body ingestion with perforation. Urgent laparotomy revealed an omental abscess, which was excised, and the perforation site was repaired with sutures. This case underscores the risk of misdiagnosis and the importance of timely recognition and management. It also emphasizes the critical role of imaging, particularly computed tomography, in accurate diagnosis and differentiation from other common conditions.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic hernia is most commonly congenital; however, it can also be acquired, most often due to trauma. It is a life-threatening condition resulting in abdominal visceral incarceration and subsequent mortality.
METHODS: Our patient was a 27-year-old mother who presented with upper abdominal pain associated with breathlessness. There was no history of trauma. The chest X-ray suggested the diagnosis of a diaphragmatic hernia which was further confirmed on CT. The decision was made to operate on the patient through a laparoscopic approach using single-lung ventilation. A diaphragmatic rent was identified with the incarceration of the stomach and omentum. The rent was widened further which allowed partial reduction of contents and visualization of the left hemithorax which was entirely contaminated. An additional thoracic approach was opted for which enabled reduction of the herniated stomach. A large perforation was present along the greater curvature, which was resected using a linear endo stapler. The diaphragmatic rent was then repaired primarily. Adequate lavage, aspiration, and mopping were performed along with chest tube drainage. The patient remained stable post-operatively.
CONCLUSIONS: An optimal surgical repair along with sound perioperative care is essential for the successful management of diaphragmatic hernia. A minimally invasive approach avoided extensive open surgery and the complications that would come with it for a young nursing mother.
CONCLUSIONS: Such technically challenging cases can be successfully managed with a minimally invasive approach using sound surgical skills and necessary improvisations.

Peptic ulcer disease refers to a break in the gastric or duodenal mucosal wall extending into the muscular mucosa. Although peptic ulcer disease commonly presents with dyspepsia, about 70% of patients initially present asymptomatically. A perforated peptic ulcer is a life-threatening complication of peptic ulcer disease that has high morbidity and mortality and requires emergent surgery. To prevent complications of peptic ulcer disease, an extensive history, physical examination, and appropriate imaging are required for appropriate management. In addition, the use of appropriate imaging and diagnostic modalities, such as an oral contrast computerized tomography of the abdomen, may lead to emergent treatment if complications arise. We present a unique case of a contained perforated duodenal ulcer within a fistula tract (Ulcère Perforé-Bouché) and diagnostic tools yielding detection and treatment of an Ulcère Perforé-Bouché. Abdominal x-rays may be inadequate the detect Ulcère Perforé-Bouché. However, an oral contract computerized tomography of the abdomen may have greater detection capabilities to diagnose cases of Ulcère Perforé-Bouché.

Situs inversus, an uncommon disorder, causes the orientation of asymmetric organs to be opposite to that of normal anatomy. It can be either partial, affecting only the thoracic or abdominal cavities, or full, involving the transposition of both the thoracic and abdominal organs. A 31-year-old Ethiopian male patient presented with migratory abdominal pain in the left lower quadrant for 3 days. Associated with the pain, he experienced symptoms of nausea, vomiting of ingested matter, and loss of appetite. Investigations were consistent with left-sided appendicitis with situs inversus totalis. Therefore, the patient was operated on and discharged with no perioperative complications. Appendicitis is a rare cause of left lower quadrant pain. In order to reduce the delay in patient treatment and avoidable perioperative complications, emergency physicians, radiologists, and surgeons must become more knowledgeable about situs inversus and left side appendicitis.

We experienced a rare case in which iliopsoas abscess (IPA), caused by an Extended Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-producing Proteus mirabilis, perforated and communicated with the ureter and caused sepsis. An 84-year-old woman, bedridden due to sequelae of a cerebral hemorrhage, was brought to our hospital with a chief complaint of fever lasting for 3 weeks. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a huge 180 × 110 × 100 mm IPA in the right iliopsoas muscle. The ureter was also found to communicate with the iliopsoas muscle abscess, ureteral stenosis was detected at the same site, and dilatation of the renal pelvis occurred above the area of the ureteral stenosis, indicating hydronephrosis. Considering the mechanism of this case, if the ureter first ruptures and urine leaks, followed by the formation of an IPA, urine will flow along the surrounding fatty tissue and cause an abscess around the ureter and kidney. However, because almost no abscess was detected around the ureter, the abscess was thought to have originated from the iliopsoas muscle located near the center of the ureter. In summary, in this case, an abscess first formed within the iliopsoas muscle, which gradually expanded and compressed the right ureter, resulting in hydronephrosis. The upper ureter, which had become dilated and thinned due to ureteral obstruction, became even more fragile because of the spread of inflammation from the IPA, and the IPA perforated and communicated with the ureter. In patients who have difficulty communicating, the diagnosis of IPA may be delayed because the only symptom is fever. As in this case, if the diagnosis is delayed, the abscess may become large and perforate the ureter; thus, IPA should always be considered as a cause of fever of unknown origin.

UNASSIGNED: Perforation of Meckel\'s diverticulum (MD) is rare, particularly by foreign body. High index of suspicion and thorough intraoperative assessment is needed in patients undergoing surgery for acute appendicitis, specifically when appendix appears normal.
UNASSIGNED: Meckel\'s diverticulum is the most common congenital anomaly of the gastrointestinal tract. While often asymptomatic, it can present with several complications. Perforation due to foreign body ingestion is rare but can have severe consequences if late diagnosis occurs. A 13-year-old male, initially suspected of acute appendicitis, was eventually diagnosed with perforation of MD by a wood splinter-like foreign body after intraoperative assessment. Histological analysis revealed ectopic colonic tissue within the MD, a finding whose implications are not well understood, in contrast with the well-established complications associated with ectopic gastric and pancreatic tissues. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of MD, which can mimic acute appendicitis, emphasizing the need for high suspicion when faced with atypical clinical presentation such as foreign body-induced perforation. Although surgical resection of asymptomatic MD remains controversial, we recommend a case-specific approach based on risk factors to guide decision-making on surgical resection for asymptomatic MD.

Radiographic studies are used within healthcare on a routine basis to aid in the diagnosis and management of patients with a variety of health conditions. Barium sulfate is a contrast agent that may be used to enhance certain imaging studies. Although barium-contrasted studies are generally safe, they are not without risk for complications. Barium impactions, and their management, are infrequently reported in scientific literature. We present a case of a patient with barium impaction who presented at the emergency room after a fall from standing with associated symptoms of abdominal pain, weakness, and fatigue. A non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scan performed on presentation revealed the barium impaction, and initial attempts at conservative management were unsuccessful. A decompressive colonoscopy was performed without successful dissolution of the barium. Ultimately, the patient underwent exploratory laparotomy, which revealed a contained perforation of the sigmoid colon, and a successful partial colectomy with end colostomy was performed. This case study explores the surgical management of barium impaction in a comorbid patient.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal tumors, with jejunal GISTs being particularly uncommon. Jejunal GISTs causing perforation and acute diffuse peritonitis is rare.
METHODS: A 53-year-old female with a history of hypertension presented with severe, acute abdominal pain and vomiting. Examination revealed abdominal distension, tenderness, and guarding, with imaging suggestive of gastrointestinal perforation. Emergency laparotomy revealed a 9 cm × 8 cm mass with perforation in the jejunum, which was resected which on histopathological examination confirmed a low-grade GIST. The postoperative course was complicated by a wound infection, managed with antibiotics and secondary suturing. At one-year follow-up, the patient remained disease-free without the need for adjuvant therapy.
UNASSIGNED: The most common symptoms of jejunal GISTs include vague abdominal pain or discomfort, early satiety, obstruction or hemorrhage. Preoperative diagnosis and confirmation of GIST is difficult due to nonspecific symptoms and none of the radiographic procedures can establish the diagnosis with certainty. The surgical excision of the tumor along with infiltrated tissues is the treatment of choice for GIST.
CONCLUSIONS: This case underscores the necessity of considering GISTs in differential diagnoses of acute abdomen and the critical role of prompt surgical management and multidisciplinary care in achieving favorable outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Fewer than 200 cases of Perforated Duodenal Diverticulum (\"PDD\") have been reported in the literature. The percentage of caused by trauma is generally very low and similar to rates recorded for duodenal injuries caused by trauma in the absence of diverticula (3 %-5 %). As a rare cause of abdominal pain after trauma, perforated duodenal diverticula are seldom diagnosed preoperatively. Despite preoperative CT scan demonstrating duodenal perforation, a diverticular origin is often only identified intraoperatively.
METHODS: A 36-year-old man was admitted to the emergency department with severe upper abdominal pain that began after blunt trauma by a kick to his upper abdomen during a fight. A duodenal injury was identified by CT. Exploratory laparotomy then revealed a retroperitoneal perforation of a diverticulum located at the second segment of the duodenum.
CONCLUSIONS: A review of the literature found few cases reporting perforated duodenal diverticulum secondary to trauma. Most cases identified the diverticulum at intraoperative exploration, with most approaches being through open surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Perforation of a duodenal diverticulum secondary to trauma is an extremely rare event, which is why it is often overlooked in the differential diagnosis of acute abdomen. As the presenting signs are often suggestive of duodenal perforation without a clear notion of duodenal diverticula at CT scan, a surgical approach and exploration is most frequently described. In our experience, the management of traumatic PDD aligns with the literature favoring the open surgical approach.