Parotid carcinoma

腮腺癌
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨多形性腺瘤(PA)和不典型腮腺腺癌(PCA)术前CT增强后的细胞外体积分数(ECV)和动脉强化分数(AEF)对常规图像和临床特征的增加价值。
    方法:2010年1月至2023年10月,共收集187例腮腺肿瘤患者,分为训练队列(102个PA和51个PCAs)和测试队列(24个PA和10个非典型PCAs)。评估肿瘤的临床和CT图像特征。计算了增强CT衍生的ECV和AEF。单变量分析确定的变量在训练队列中的两个亚组之间具有统计学上的显着差异。采用正向变量选择方法进行多因素logistic回归分析,建立4个模型(临床模型,临床模型+ECV,临床模型+AEF,和组合模型)。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估诊断性能。德隆检验比较了模型的差异,和校准曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)评估校准和临床应用。
    结果:选择年龄和边界建立临床模型,并构建其ROC曲线。合并临床模型,ECV,和AEF建立组合模型在训练和测试队列中与临床模型相比显示出优异的诊断有效性(AUC=0.888,0.867)。在训练队列中组合模型和临床模型之间存在显著的统计学差异(p=0.0145)。
    结论:ECV和AEF有助于区分PA和非典型PCA,整合临床和CT图像特征可以进一步提高诊断性能。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the added value of extracellular volume fraction (ECV) and arterial enhancement fraction (AEF) derived from enhanced CT to conventional image and clinical features for differentiating between pleomorphic adenoma (PA) and atypical parotid adenocarcinoma (PCA) pre-operation.
    METHODS: From January 2010 to October 2023, a total of 187 cases of parotid tumors were recruited, and divided into training cohort (102 PAs and 51 PCAs) and testing cohort (24 PAs and 10 atypical PCAs). Clinical and CT image features of tumor were assessed. Both enhanced CT-derived ECV and AEF were calculated. Univariate analysis identified variables with statistically significant differences between the two subgroups in the training cohort. Multivariate logistic regression analysis with the forward variable selection method was used to build four models (clinical model, clinical model+ECV, clinical model+AEF, and combined model). Diagnostic performances were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. Delong\'s test compared model differences, and calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) assessed calibration and clinical application.
    RESULTS: Age and boundary were chosen to build clinical model, and to construct its ROC curve. Amalgamating the clinical model, ECV, and AEF to establish a combined model demonstrated superior diagnostic effectiveness compared to the clinical model in both the training and test cohorts (AUC = 0.888, 0.867). There was a significant statistical difference between the combined model and the clinical model in the training cohort (p = 0.0145).
    CONCLUSIONS: ECV and AEF are helpful in differentiating PA and atypical PCA, and integrating clinical and CT image features can further improve the diagnostic performance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究的目的是分析临床特点,腮腺肿瘤患者的手术治疗和临床结果,并将结果与文献中引用的结果进行比较。对140例患者进行了回顾性研究(男性,n=77;女性,n=63)在Hokuto医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科(Obihiro,日本)在2007年4月至2021年12月之间。在140名患者中,118例(84.3%)患者有良性肿瘤,包括63例(45%)多形性腺瘤患者和43例(30.7%)Warthin肿瘤患者,腮腺癌22例(15.7%)。三组腮腺肿瘤患者的比较表明,Warthin肿瘤患者的吸烟年数明显高于腮腺癌(P=0.011)或多形性腺瘤(P<0.001)。细针抽吸细胞学(FNAC)仅对140例患者中的6例(4.3%)没有诊断性。敏感性,特异性,正预测值,通过常规涂片和液基细胞学(LBC)对腮腺癌的FNAC阴性预测值和准确性分别为70、99、93.3、94.4和82.9%,分别。在22例腮腺癌患者中,在10例(45%)和11例(50%)中进行了扩大的全/全和浅表腮腺切除术,分别。从II级到I级的区域的完全和选择性颈部解剖,II和III分别在6例(24%)和7例(32%)患者中进行,分别。术后放疗(50Gy)15例(68%)。5年总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)分别为51.5%和76.4%,分别。单因素分析显示年龄>65岁与5年OS(P<0.001)和DFS(P<0.001)显著相关。多变量分析显示,年龄超过65岁合并高级别组织学恶性肿瘤与不良DFS相关(P=0.02;风险比,3.628;95%置信区间,1.283-9.514)。总之,腮腺肿瘤的临床特征和治疗结果与以前报道的结果一致。吸烟可能与Warthin肿瘤的发病机制密切相关。LBC潜在地在FNAC中提供改进的准确度。
    The aim of the present study was to analyze the clinical characteristics, surgical treatments and clinical outcome of patients with parotid gland tumors and to compare the results with those cited in the literature. A retrospective study was conducted in 140 patients (male, n=77; female, n=63) with parotid gland tumors who underwent parotidectomy at Hokuto Hospital Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (Obihiro, Japan) between April 2007 and December 2021. Of the 140 patients enrolled, 118 (84.3%) patients had benign tumors, including 63 (45%) patients with pleomorphic adenomas and 43 (30.7%) patients with Warthin tumors, and 22 patients (15.7%) had parotid carcinoma. Comparison of the three groups of patients with parotid gland tumors indicated that pack years as an indicator of smoking status were significantly higher in patients with Warthin tumors than in those with parotid carcinomas (P=0.011) or pleomorphic adenoma (P<0.001). Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was non-diagnostic for only 6 (4.3%) of 140 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of FNAC by both conventional smear and liquid-based cytology (LBC) for parotid carcinomas were 70, 99, 93.3, 94.4 and 82.9%, respectively. Among the 22 patients with parotid carcinoma, extended total/total and superficial parotidectomy were performed in 10 (45%) and 11 (50%) cases, respectively. Total and selective neck dissection of the area from level II to I, II and III were performed in 6 (24%) and 7 (32%) patients, respectively. Postoperative radiotherapy (50 Gy) was performed in 15 (68%) patients. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates at 5 years were 51.5 and 76.4%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that age >65 years was significantly associated with poorer 5-year OS (P<0.001) and DFS (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that an age of more than 65 years combined with high-grade histologic malignancy was associated with worse DFS (P=0.02; hazard ratio, 3.628; 95% confidence interval, 1.283-9.514). In conclusion, the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of parotid gland tumors were consistent with the results of previous reports. Smoking may be closely related to the pathogenesis of Warthin tumors. LBC potentially provides improved accuracy in FNAC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    背景:这项研究调查了18年期间在单一机构治疗腮腺癌患者的临床结果,专注于诊断,治疗,和生存。
    方法:本研究对象为1999年9月至2017年8月在我科治疗18年的171例腮腺癌患者。第一阶段有19名患者,65例II期患者,22例III期患者,和65例IV期患者。症状,术前诊断,淋巴结转移,存活率,预后因素,和免疫组织学检查结果进行了调查。
    结果:只有34%的患者可以通过细针穿刺细胞学检查术前诊断组织学分级。而72%的组织学分级通过冰冻切片活检正确确定。淋巴结转移的总发生率为29%,59%的患者患有高级别癌症,只有6%的患者患有低/中度肿瘤。I期患者的疾病特异性5年生存率为100%,第二阶段为95.2%,第三阶段为70.4%,第四阶段为45.1%。多因素分析显示病理分级是最重要的预后因素。免疫组织学研究显示,HER-2或雄激素受体阳性肿瘤患者的预后明显较差。
    结论:尽管高级别肿瘤是最重要的预后因素,术前分级诊断并不总是准确的.由于晚期癌症预后差,对手术和放射治疗的反应有限,开发新的治疗策略,例如针对HER-2和AR的分子靶向治疗,是必需的。
    BACKGROUND: This study investigated the clinical outcomes of patients with parotid carcinoma at a single institution during an 18-year period, with the focus on diagnosis, treatment, and survival.
    METHODS: The subjects were 171 patients with parotid carcinoma treated at our department during the 18-year period from September 1999 to August 2017. There were 19 patients in stage I, 65 patients in stage II, 22 patients in stage III, and 65 patients in stage IV. The symptoms, preoperative diagnosis, node metastasis, survival rate, prognostic factors, and immunohistological findings were investigated.
    RESULTS: Preoperative diagnosis of the histological grade by fine-needle aspiration cytology was only possible in 34% of the patients, while the histological grade was correctly determined by frozen section biopsy in 72%. The overall frequency of lymph node metastasis was 29%, with 59% in patients with high-grade carcinoma and only 6% in those with low-/intermediate-grade tumors. The disease-specific 5-year survival rate was 100% for patients in stage I, 95.2% in stage II, 70.4% in stage III, and 45.1% in stage IV. Multivariate analysis showed that the pathological grade was the most important prognostic factor. Immunohistological investigation showed patients with HER-2 or androgen receptor-positive tumors had a significantly worse prognosis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although a high-grade tumor is the most important prognostic factor, preoperative diagnosis of the grade was not always accurate. Since advanced cancer has a poor prognosis with a limited response to surgery and radiation therapy, development of new treatment strategies, such as molecular-targeting therapies directed against HER-2 and AR, is required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号