Parotid Neoplasms

腮腺肿瘤
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:涎腺导管癌(SDC)是一种侵袭性癌症,皮肤转移是罕见的。此外,SDC继发于烫伤的皮肤转移更罕见,据我们所知,我们的案例代表了第一个这样的例子。考虑到手指在转移部位的受累,这可能会影响肢体功能和生活质量,我们提出这个病例来探讨烫伤可能导致远处复发的原因和更好的治疗方案。
    方法:一名被诊断为腮腺SDC的85岁男子因烧伤而在指尖发现肿大的肿块,6年后,他的初步治疗。
    方法:腮腺中SDC的皮肤转移和由于手术导致的左手拇指丢失。
    方法:提供放射治疗,瞄准手指上的群众,剂量为15Gy分3次,3个部分中的12Gy,双手在3个部分中为15Gy,左手仅在7个部分中为21Gy。
    结果:放疗2个月后肿瘤缩小,患者恢复良好。副作用包括指甲增生和甲沟炎。
    结论:本病例中烫伤与恶性肿瘤远处转移的关系有待进一步研究。考虑到手指在处理转移时的保留功能,建议放疗而不是手术。
    BACKGROUND: Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is an aggressive form of cancer, with cutaneous metastasis being a rare occurrence. Furthermore, cutaneous metastasis of SDC secondary to a scald is even rarer, and to the best of our knowledge, our case represents the first such instance. Considering the involvement of the fingers in the metastatic site, which may affect limb function and quality of life, we present this case to explore the reason why scald could lead to distant recurrence and better treatment options.
    METHODS: An 85-year-old man diagnosed with SDC in the parotid gland found enlarged masses at the fingertips as a consequence of a burn, 6 years after his initial treatment.
    METHODS: Cutaneous metastasis of SDC in the parotid gland and left thumb loss due to surgery.
    METHODS: Radiotherapy was offered, targeting at the masses on the fingers, with dose at 15 Gy in 3 fractions, 12 Gy in 3 fractions, 15 Gy in 3 fractions for both hands and additional 21 Gy in 7 fractions only for left hand.
    RESULTS: The tumors shrank after 2 months of radiotherapy and the patient recovered well. Side effects included nail hyperplasia and paronychia.
    CONCLUSIONS: Connections between scald and distant metastasis of malignant tumors in this case needed further investigation. Considering reserving function of the fingers while dealing with metastasis, radiotherapy is recommended rather than surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定原发肿瘤部位手术在原发涎腺癌治疗中的作用。
    方法:法国罕见头颈部肿瘤网络(REFCOR)组成了一个指导小组,对Medline上发表的文献进行了非系统的叙事综述,并提出建议。然后由评级小组评估对建议的遵守程度,根据正式共识方法。
    结果:涎腺肿瘤的治疗主要是手术治疗。腮腺癌的黄金标准是全腮腺切除术,获得清晰的边缘并切除所有的腮腺内淋巴结。对于低度肿瘤,在明确组织学的术后诊断的情况下,腮腺部分切除术和肿瘤的广泛切除是可以接受的。如果确定性分析的利润率为正,应评估翻修手术的可行性,并在可能的情况下进行。
    结论:原发性大涎腺癌的治疗是基于手术切除边缘清晰,尽可能远离肿瘤。手术类型取决于肿瘤的位置,病理类型和延伸。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of surgery of the primary tumor site in the management of primary major salivary gland cancer.
    METHODS: The French Network of Rare Head and Neck Tumors (REFCOR) formed a steering group, which drafted a non-systematic narrative review of the literature published on Medline, and proposed recommendations. The level of adherence to the recommendations was then assessed by a rating group, according to the formal consensus method.
    RESULTS: Treatment of salivary gland tumor is mainly surgical. The gold standard for parotid cancer is a total parotidectomy, to obtain clear margins and remove all intraparotid lymph nodes. For low-grade tumors, partial parotidectomy with wide excision of the tumor is acceptable in the case of postoperative diagnosis on definitive histology. In the event of positive margins on definitive analysis, revision surgery should be assessed for feasibility, and performed if possible.
    CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of primary major salivary gland cancer is based on surgery with clear resection margins, as far away as possible from the tumor. The type of surgery depends on tumor location, pathologic type and extension.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: The authors present the guidelines of the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (SFORL) for the management of recurrent pleomorphic adenoma (RPA) of the parotid gland.
    METHODS: A review of the literature was performed by a multidisciplinary task force. Guidelines were drafted, based on the articles retrieved and the work group members\' individual experience. There were then read and re-edited by an independent reading group. The proposed recommendations were graded A, B or C on decreasing levels of evidence.
    RESULTS: Complete resection under neuromonitoring is recommended in case of RPA. The risks of progression and malignant transformation, which are higher the younger the patient, have to be taken into consideration. The risk of functional sequelae must be explained to the patient. MRI is recommended ahead of any surgery for parotid RPA, to determine extension and detect subclinical lesions. Radiotherapy should be considered in case of multi-recurrent pleomorphic adenoma after macroscopically complete revision surgery at high risk of new recurrence (microscopic residual disease), in case of RPA after incomplete resection, and in non-operable RPA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    BACKGROUND: Bell´s palsy is the most common cause of facial paralysis worldwide and the most common disorder of the cranial nerves. It is a diagnosis of exclusion, accounting for 60-75% of all acquired peripheral facial nerve palsies. Our case shows the first case of a microcystic adnexal carcinoma-like squamous cell carcinoma as a cause of facial nerve palsy.
    METHODS: The patient, a 70-year-old Caucasian male, experienced subsequent functional impairment of the trigeminal and the glossopharyngeal nerve about 1½ years after refractory facial nerve palsy. An extensive clinical work-up and tissue biopsy of the surrounding parotid gland tissue was not able to determine the cause of the paralysis. Primary infiltration of the facial nerve with subsequent spreading to the trigeminal and glossopharyngeal nerve via neuroanastomoses was suspected. After discussing options with the patient, the main stem of the facial nerve was resected to ascertain the diagnosis of MAC-like squamous cell carcinoma, and radiochemotherapy was subsequently started.
    CONCLUSIONS: This case report shows that even rare neoplastic etiologies should be considered as a cause of refractory facial nerve palsy and that it is necessary to perform an extended diagnostic work-up to ascertain the diagnosis. This includes high-resolution MRI imaging and, as perilesional parotid biopsies might be inadequate for rare cases like ours, consideration of a direct nerve biopsy to establish the right diagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    This is the official guideline endorsed by the specialty associations involved in the care of head and neck cancer patients in the UK. Salivary gland tumours are rare and have very wide histological heterogeneity, thus making it difficult to generate high level evidence. This paper provides recommendations on the assessment and management of patients with cancer originating from the salivary glands in the head and neck. Recommendations • Ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology is recommended for all salivary tumours and cytology should be reported by an expert histopathologist. (R) • Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following surgery is recommended for all malignant submandibular tumours except in cases of small, low-grade tumours that have been completely excised. (R) • For benign parotid tumours complete excision of the tumour should be performed and offers good cure rates. (R) • In the event of intra-operative tumour spillage, most cases need long-term follow-up for clinical observation only. These should be raised in the multidisciplinary team to discuss the merits of adjuvant RT. (G) • As a general principle, if the facial nerve function is normal pre-operatively then every attempt to preserve facial nerve function should be made during parotidectomy and if the facial nerve is divided intra-operatively then immediate microsurgical repair (with an interposition nerve graft if required) should be considered. (G) • Neck dissection is recommended in all cases of malignant parotid tumours except for low-grade small tumours. (R) • Where malignant parotid tumours lie in close proximity to the facial nerve there should be a low threshold for adjuvant RT. (G) • Adjuvant RT should be considered in high grade or large tumours or in cases where there is incomplete or close resection margin. (R) • Adjuvant RT should be prescribed on the basis of clinical factors in addition to histology and grade, e.g. stage, pre-operative facial weakness, positive margins, peri-neural invasion and extracapsular spread. (R).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    This is the official guideline endorsed by the specialty associations involved in the care of head and neck cancer patients in the UK. It provides recommendations on the work up and management of lateral skull base cancer based on the existing evidence base for this rare condition. Recommendations • All patients with more than one of: chronic otalgia, bloody otorrhoea, bleeding, mass, facial swelling or palsy should be biopsied. (R) • Magnetic resonance and computed tomography imaging should be performed. (R) • Patients should undergo audiological assessment. (R) • Carotid angiography is recommended in select patients. (G) • The modified Pittsburg T-staging system is recommended. (G) • The minimum operation for cancer involving the temporal bone is a lateral temporal bone resection. (R) • Facial nerve rehabilitation should be initiated at primary surgery. (G) • Anterolateral thigh free flap is the workhorse flap for lateral skull base defect reconstruction. (G) • For patients undergoing surgery for squamous cell carcinoma, at least a superficial parotidectomy and selective neck dissection should be carried out. (R).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:最近,已制定并发布了相关部位放射治疗(ISRT)指南,以取代以往淋巴瘤患者相关部位放射治疗的概念.然而,这些ISRT指南可以用不同的方式解释,给前瞻性临床试验带来困难。本研究报告了有关ISRT指南解释的调查结果。
    方法:44位淋巴瘤放射肿瘤学家被要求参加一项调查,该调查包括7个不同的病例和9个问题。问题与ISRT轮廓有关,并要求受访者在2个不同的答案(无“正确”答案)和第三个允许写入选项之间进行选择。
    结果:52%的受访者回答了问卷。在那些回答的人中,72%的人已经练习了10年以上,46%的人每年治疗>20例霍奇金淋巴瘤病例,100%熟悉ISRT概念。在与7个案例相关的9个问题中,3在专家放射肿瘤学家之间的一致性超过70%。其中六个问题的一致性不到70%(范围,56%-67%)。
    结论:即使在专业放射肿瘤学家中,ISRT指南的解释是可变的。需要进一步指导ISRT现场设计,以减少执业医师之间的差异。
    OBJECTIVE: Recently, involved-site radiation therapy (ISRT) guidelines have been developed and published to replace the previous concept of involved-field radiation therapy for patients with lymphoma. However, these ISRT guidelines may be interpreted in different ways, posing difficulties for prospective clinical trials. This study reports survey results regarding interpretation of the ISRT guidelines.
    METHODS: Forty-four expert lymphoma radiation oncologists were asked to participate in a survey that included 7 different cases associated with 9 questions. The questions pertained to ISRT contouring and asked respondents to choose between 2 different answers (no \"correct\" answer) and a third write-in option allowed.
    RESULTS: Fifty-two percent of those surveyed responded to the questionnaire. Among those who responded, 72% have practiced for >10 years, 46% have treated >20 Hodgkin lymphoma cases annually, and 100% were familiar with the ISRT concept. Among the 9 questions associated with the 7 cases, 3 had concordance among the expert radiation oncologists of greater than 70%. Six of the questions had less than 70% concordance (range, 56%-67%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Even among expert radiation oncologists, interpretation of ISRT guidelines is variable. Further guidance for ISRT field design will be needed to reduce variability among practicing physicians.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Guideline
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号