BACKGROUND: The early detection of pancreatic cancer is an important step in reducing mortality by offering patients curative treatment. Screening strategies in risk populations and by means of different detection methods have been economically evaluated. However, a synthesis of screening studies to inform resource allocation towards early detection within the disease area has not been done. Therefore, studies evaluating the cost-effectiveness and costs of screening for pancreatic cancer should be systematically reviewed.
METHODS: A systematic review of economic evaluations reporting the cost-effectiveness or costs of pancreatic cancer screening will be conducted. The electronic databases Medline, Web of Science and EconLit will be searched without geographical or time restrictions. Two independent reviewers will select eligible studies based on predefined criteria. The study quality will be assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement and the Bias in Economic Evaluation checklist. One reviewer will extract relevant data and a second reviewer will cross-check compliance with the extraction sheet. Key items will include characteristics of screened individuals, the screening strategies used, and costs, health effects and cost-effectiveness as study outputs. Differences of opinion between the reviewers will be solved by consulting a third reviewer.
BACKGROUND: Ethics approval is not required for this study since no original data will be collected. The results will be disseminated through presentations at conferences and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The results of the systematic review will inform future economic evaluations of pancreatic screening, which provide guidance for decision-making in healthcare resource prioritisation.
UNASSIGNED: CRD42023475348.

<b>Introduction:</b> Gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are malignancies originating from cells of the diffuse endocrine system. They are rare and localize in the upper and lower parts of the gastrointestinal tract and in the pancreas. Despite such a varied location, GEP-NENs are considered a common group of neoplasms due to the fact of their similar morphology and ability to secrete peptide hormones and biologically active amines. They are associated with clinical manifestations specific to the substances produced by a particular neoplasm. The classification of GEP-NENs is constantly systematized and updated based on their differentiation and grading. The development of available diagnostic and treatment methods for these tumors has made significant progress over the past 10 years and is still ongoing.<b>Aim:</b> In the following paper, we review the diagnostics and treatment of GEP-NENs, taking into account the latest molecular, immunological, or gene-based methods. Imaging methods using markers for receptors allow for high diagnostic sensitivity<b>Methods:</b> Medical databases were searched for the latest information. The authors also sought confirmation of the content of a particular publication in another publications, so as to present the most reliable information possible.<b>Results:</b> Research results revealed that the diagnostics and treatment of GEP-NENs have significantly advanced in recent years. Surgical interventions, especially minimally invasive techniques, have shown efficacy in treating GEP-NENs, with specific therapies such as somatostatin analogs, chemotherapy, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy demonstrating promising outcomes. The evolution of diagnostic methods, including imaging techniques and biomarker testing, has contributed to improved patient care and prognosis.<b>Conclusions:</b> The increasing incidence of GEP-NENs is attributed to enhanced diagnostic capabilities rather than a rise in population prevalence. The study emphasizes the importance of ongoing research to identify specific markers for early detection and targeted therapies to further enhance the effectiveness of treating these rare and heterogeneous malignancies. The findings suggest a positive trajectory in the management of GEP-NENs, with future prospects focused on personalized and targeted treatment approaches.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive tumors, and the most common cause of cancer-related deaths. In the past, vascular infiltration of the tumor rendered the disease unresectable. However, today, venous or arterial involvement of a PDAC is classified as borderline resectable (BR) or locally advanced (LA) disease. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with vascular resections is a promising intervention intended for complete resection of BR- and LA-PDAC. This study aims to assess the overall survival of patients undergoing PD with vascular resections, compared to those without. A PubMed search was conducted for cohort studies that included patients with BR- or LA-PDAC treated with vascular resections. The retrieved publications were screened following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist. The study protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Sixteen cohort studies were included in our systematic review. Fourteen of them included patients undergoing PD with venous-only resections for PDAC. The 5-year overall survival rates ranged from 8.0% to 22.2% for vascular resection patients, and 4.0% to 24.3% for standard PD patients. Three cohorts included patients with PDAC and arterial and/or venous involvement who were treated with arterial resections. Their median overall survival ranged from 13.7 to 17.0 months, similar to that of patients who did not undergo vascular resections. PD with vascular resections in patients with BR- and LA-PDAC could lead to similar overall survival to that after standard PD.

The application of multidisciplinary techniques in the management of endocrine-related cancers is crucial for harnessing the advantages of multiple disciplines and their coordinated efforts in eliminating tumors. Due to the malignant characteristics of cancer cells, they possess the capacity to develop resistance to traditional treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Nevertheless, despite diligent endeavors to enhance the prediction of outcomes, the overall survival rate for individuals afflicted with endocrine-related malignancy remains quite miserable. Hence, it is imperative to investigate innovative therapy strategies. The latest advancements in therapeutic tactics have offered novel approaches for the therapy of various endocrine tumors. This paper examines the advancements in nano-drug delivery techniques and the utilization of nanomaterials for precise cancer cures through targeted therapy. This review provides a thorough analysis of the potential of combined drug delivery strategies in the treatment of thyroid cancer, adrenal gland tumors, and pancreatic cancer. The objective of this study is to gain a deeper understanding of current therapeutic approaches, stimulate the development of new drug DDS, and improve the effectiveness of treatment for patients with these diseases. The intracellular uptake of pharmaceuticals into cancer cells can be significantly improved through the implantation of synthetic or natural substances into nanoparticles, resulting in a substantial reduction in the development of endocrine malignancies.

Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal disease with a poor prognosis. Its early diagnosis and accurate treatment mainly rely on medical imaging, so accurate medical image analysis is especially vital for pancreatic cancer patients. However, medical image analysis of pancreatic cancer is facing challenges due to ambiguous symptoms, high misdiagnosis rates, and significant financial costs. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a promising solution by relieving medical personnel\'s workload, improving clinical decision-making, and reducing patient costs. This study focuses on AI applications such as segmentation, classification, object detection, and prognosis prediction across five types of medical imaging: CT, MRI, EUS, PET, and pathological images, as well as integrating these imaging modalities to boost diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficiency. In addition, this study discusses current hot topics and future directions aimed at overcoming the challenges in AI-enabled automated pancreatic cancer diagnosis algorithms.

Insulinoma is the most common functional neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas, with the main clinical symptom being hypoglycemia. The standard treatment is surgery, but some patients are not eligible for surgery, while in those operated on, the risk of perioperative complications is up to 30%. Diazoxide treatment to prevent hypoglycemia is effective only in 50% of patients. To prevent tumor growth and hormonal excess, stereotactic radiotherapy may be an alternative to surgical treatment. In our paper, we present two cases of patients with insulinoma treated successfully with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare perioperative and oncologic outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with robotic-assisted surgery versus open laparotomy. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies up to June 15, 2024, were identified using PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Additionally, reference lists of included studies, relevant review articles, and clinical guidelines were manually searched. The primary outcomes evaluated were length of stay, 90-day mortality, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), and Post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH). Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, reoperation rate, lymph node yield, and operative time. The final analysis included 10 retrospective cohort studies involving 23,272 patients (2,179 robotic-assisted and 21,093 open surgery). There were no significant differences between the two procedures in terms of postoperative pancreatic fistula, Post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage, lymph node yield, and operative time. However, patients undergoing robotic-assisted surgery had shorter lengths of stay, lower 90-day mortality, and less estimated blood loss compared to those undergoing open surgery. The reoperation rate was higher for the robotic-assisted group. Robotic-assisted surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is safe and feasible. Compared to open surgery, it offers better perioperative and short-term oncologic outcomes, but with a higher risk of reoperation.

UNASSIGNED: This systematic review and meta-analysis examined whether the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) can serve as an indicator for predicting the prognosis of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.
UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO: CRD42023461260. A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases up to September 2023 to assess whether LMR can predict the prognosis of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. The outcomes measured included subgroup analyses of overall survival (OS) with hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals of geographical region, patient population, and LMR threshold. A sensitivity analysis was also performed for OS and HR and confidence intervals were calculated for recurrence-free survival (RFS).
UNASSIGNED: A total of 14 eligible articles, comprising 4,019 patients, were included in the comprehensive analysis. The results of this comprehensive analysis indicate that LMR is a robust predictor of OS, demonstrating strong prognostic significance (HR = 0.55, 95% CI [0.44-0.69], I2 = 79%, P < 0.00001). This predictive significance extended to various types of pancreatic cancer, such as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (HR = 0.73, 95% CI [0.57-0.93], I2 = 46%, P = 0.01), pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (HR = 0.81, 95% CI [0.66-0.99], P = 0.04) and other subtypes (HR = 0.40, 95% CI [0.22-0.72], I2 = 89%, P < 0.00001), but not to pancreatic head cancer (HR = 0.46, 95% CI [0.16-1.13], I2 = 59%, P = 0.12). LMR retained its predictive value across different regions, including Asia (HR = 0.62, 95% CI [0.47-0.76], I2 = 68%, P < 0.0001), Europe (HR = 0.78, 95% CI [0.67-0.91], I2 = 0%, P = 0.002), and the Americas (HR = 0.14, 95% CI [0.08-0.24], I2 = 0%, P < 0.00001). Notably, both LMR cut-off values greater than or equal to three (HR = 0.62, 95% CI [0.47-0.82], I2 = 67%, P = 0.0009) and less than three (HR = 0.47, 95% CI [0.32-0.69], I2 = 85%, P = 0.0001) exhibited prognostic significance. The sensitivity analysis for OS confirmed the strong predictive value of LMR, whereas LMR did not exhibit predictive significance for RFS (HR = 0.35, 95% CI [0.09-1.32], I2 = 95%, P = 0.12). In both subgroups categorized by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) scores of ≥7 (HR = 0.66, 95% CI [0.54-0.80], I2 = 53%, P = 0.04) and <7 (HR = 0.41, CI [0.23-0.72], I2 = 89%, P < 0.00001), LMR was demonstrated to have predictive value.
UNASSIGNED: Despite the observed heterogeneity and potential biases in the included studies, the findings of this study suggest that LMR may serve as a valuable predictor of OS in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of pancreatic cancer cases are diagnosed with distant metastases, commonly in the liver, leading to poor prognosis. With modern chemotherapy regimens extending patient survival and stabilizing metastasis, there has been a rise in the use of local treatments. However, the effectiveness for local treatment remains unclear.
METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies reporting the survival outcomes of pancreatic cancer cases with isolated synchronous or metachronous liver metastases who underwent curative-intent local treatment. Hazard ratios were combined using a random-effects model.
RESULTS: The full texts of 102 studies were screened, and 14 retrospective studies were included in the meta-analysis. Among patients with synchronous liver metastases, overall survival was significantly better in those who underwent curative-intent local treatment than in those who did not (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-0.52). Among patients with metachronous liver metastases, overall survival was also significantly better in those who underwent curative-intent local treatment than in those who did not (HR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.19-0.73).
CONCLUSIONS: Curative-intent local treatment may be a feasible option for highly selected pancreatic cancer cases with liver metastases. However, the optimal strategy for local treatments should be explored in future studies.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an extremely aggressive form of cancer with a low survival rate. A successful treatment strategy should not be limited to targeting cancer cells alone, but should adopt a more comprehensive approach, taking into account other influential factors. These include the extracellular matrix (ECM) and immune microenvironment, both of which are integral components of the tumor microenvironment. The present review describes the roles of pancreatic stellate cells, differentiated cancer‑associated fibroblasts and the interleukin family, either independently or in combination, in the progression of precursor lesions in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and PDAC. These elements contribute to ECM deposition and immunosuppression in PDAC. Therapeutic strategies that integrate interleukin and/or stromal blockade for PDAC immunomodulation and fibrogenesis have yielded inconsistent results. A deeper comprehension of the intricate interplay between fibrosis, and immune responses could pave the way for more effective treatment targets, by elucidating the mechanisms and causes of ECM fibrosis during PDAC progression.