Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture

骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCFs)是常见的脆性骨折。接受初始OVCF手术治疗的患者需要特别注意,因为随后的椎骨骨折和其他类型的脆性骨折的风险增加。然而,对该特定患者组的最佳骨质疏松症治疗研究较少。
    目的:本研究比较了使用地诺塞马和双膦酸盐治疗的患者随后发生骨质疏松性骨折的风险和死亡率,并确定了坚持治疗的效果。
    方法:回顾性全国队列研究患者样本:共有2,858例经手术治疗的骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者。
    方法:骨质疏松性骨折的风险,椎骨骨折,非椎骨骨折和死亡。
    方法:这是一项使用国家健康保险研究数据库的全国性回顾性队列研究。包括年龄≥50岁的患者,他们在2012年至2016年期间接受OVCF手术干预,随后接受denosumab或双膦酸盐治疗一年。根据患者的抗骨质疏松药物和治疗依从性进行分层。多变量,时变Cox比例风险模型用于确定骨质疏松性骨折的风险,椎骨骨折,非椎骨骨折和死亡。
    结果:本研究共纳入2,858例患者:denosumab组1,123例患者,双膦酸盐组1,735例患者。与持久的denosumab用户相比,非持久性denosumab用户,持续性双膦酸盐使用者和非持续性双膦酸盐使用者患骨质疏松性骨折的风险更大,各自的风险比为1.64(95%置信区间[CI],1.16-2.32),1.74(95%CI,1.25-2.42)和1.53(95%CI,1.14-2.06)。如果将骨质疏松性骨折分为非椎体骨折和椎体骨折,与持续使用denosumab的患者相比,没有一组患者的椎骨骨折风险增加,非持久性denosumab用户的HR为1.00(95%CI:0.54-1.88),持续性双膦酸盐使用者为1.64(95%CI:0.96-2.81),非持续性双膦酸盐使用者为1.52(95%CI:0.95-2.43)。然而,非椎骨骨折的风险明显更大,各自的风险比为2.04(95%CI,1.33-3.11),非持久性denosumab用户的1.80(95%CI,1.18-2.76)和1.56(95%CI,1.06-2.27),持久性双膦酸盐使用者和非持久性使用者。值得注意的是,非持续性denosumab使用者比持续性denosumab使用者表现出更大的死亡风险,风险比为3.12(95%CI,2.22-4.38)。
    结论:对于需要住院治疗和手术干预的OVCF患者,与接受双膦酸盐或非持续性地诺塞马治疗的患者相比,接受持续地诺塞马治疗的患者随后发生骨质疏松性骨折的风险较低.然而,停用denosumab与后续骨折和死亡率的风险显著增加相关.因此,坚持治疗对于使用denosumab的患者至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are common fragility fractures. Patients who undergo surgical treatment for their initial OVCFs warrant particular attention because there is an elevated risk of subsequent vertebral fractures and other types of fragility fractures. However, the optimal osteoporosis treatment for this specific patient group is less investigated.
    OBJECTIVE: This study compares the risk of subsequent osteoporotic fractures and mortality rate for patients who are initiated with denosumab and bisphosphonates and determines the effect of adherence to treatment.
    METHODS: Retrospective nationwide cohort study PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 2,858 patients who had surgically-managed osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
    METHODS: The risk of osteoporotic fractures, vertebral fractures, non-vertebral fractures and death.
    METHODS: This is a retrospective nationwide cohort study that uses the National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients aged ≥50 years who were admitted for surgical interventions for OVCF between 2012 and 2016 and subsequently received denosumab or bisphosphonates for one year were included. Patients were stratified according to their anti-osteoporosis medications and adherence to treatment. A multivariable, time-varying Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the risk of osteoporotic fractures, vertebral fractures, non-vertebral fractures and death.
    RESULTS: A total of 2,858 patients were included in this study: 1,123 patients in the denosumab group and 1,735 patients in the bisphosphonates group. Compared to persistent denosumab users, the non-persistent denosumab users, persistent bisphosphonate users and non-persistent bisphosphonate users had a greater risk of osteoporotic fractures, with respective hazard ratios of 1.64 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.32), 1.74 (95% CI, 1.25-2.42) and 1.53 (95% CI, 1.14-2.06). If osteoporotic fractures were divided into non-vertebral and vertebral fractures, none of the groups exhibited an increased risk of vertebral fractures compared to persistent denosumab users, with an HR of 1.00 (95% CI: 0.54-1.88) for non-persistent denosumab users, 1.64 (95% CI: 0.96-2.81) for persistent bisphosphonate users and 1.52 (95% CI: 0.95-2.43) for non-persistent bisphosphonate users. However, there was a significantly greater risk of non-vertebral fracture, with respective hazard ratios of 2.04 (95% CI, 1.33-3.11), 1.80 (95% CI, 1.18-2.76) and 1.56 (95% CI, 1.06-2.27) for non-persistent denosumab users, persistent bisphosphonate users and non-persistent users. Noteworthy, non-persistent denosumab users exhibited a significantly greater risk of mortality than persistent denosumab users, with a hazard ratio of 3.12 (95% CI, 2.22-4.38).
    CONCLUSIONS: In terms of patients with OVCFs who require hospitalization and surgical intervention, those who receive ongoing denosumab treatment exhibit less risk of developing subsequent osteoporotic fractures than those who receive bisphosphonates or non-persistent denosumab treatment. However, discontinuation of denosumab is associated with a significantly increased risk of subsequent fractures and mortality. Therefore, adherence to the treatment is crucial for patients who are initiated with denosumab.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    相邻椎体骨折(AVF)是经皮椎体成形术(PVP)或椎体后凸成形术(PKP)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCF)的严重并发症。本研究旨在探讨绝经后妇女PVP或PKP后AVF的发生率及危险因素。通过脊柱影像学检查确定AVF的发生率。通过单因素分析确定AVF的潜在危险因素。然后进行多因素logistic回归分析以确定独立危险因素。总的来说,从2019年12月至2022年2月接受PVP或PKP治疗的674名绝经后妇女被纳入研究。其中,58名(8.61%)女性在PVP或PKP后出现AVF。在调整混杂因素后,BMI(OR[95%CI]0.863[0.781-0.952];p=0.003),OVCF的既往史(OR[95%CI]1.931[1.044-3.571];p=0.036),和Hounsfield单位(HU)值(OR[95%CI]0.979[0.967-0.990];p<0.001)被发现是绝经后妇女PVP或PKP后AVF的独立危险因素。ROC分析显示BMI和HU阈值分别为21.43和65.15。总之,AVF的发生率为8.61%。BMI,既往OVCF史及HU值是绝经后妇女PVP或PKP后发生AVF的独立危险因素.
    Adjacent vertebral fracture (AVF) is a serious complication of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) or kyphoplasty (PKP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF). This study aimed to explore the incidence and risk factors of AVF following PVP or PKP in postmenopausal women. The incidence of AVF was determined by spinal radiographic examinations. The potential risk factors of AVF were identified by univariate analysis, followed by multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine the independent risk factors. In total, 674 postmenopausal women who were treated with PVP or PKP from December 2019 to February 2022 were enrolled in the study. Among them, 58 (8.61%) women experienced an AVF following PVP or PKP. After adjusting for confounding factors, BMI (OR [95% CI] 0.863 [0.781-0.952]; p = 0.003), previous history of OVCF (OR [95% CI] 1.931 [1.044-3.571]; p = 0.036), and Hounsfield unit (HU) value (OR [95% CI] 0.979 [0.967-0.990]; p < 0.001) were found to be independent risk factors of AVF following PVP or PKP in postmenopausal women. The ROC analysis revealed that the BMI and HU thresholds were 21.43 and 65.15, respectively. In conclusion, the incidence of AVF was 8.61%. BMI, previous history of OVCF and HU value were independent risk factors of AVF following PVP or PKP in postmenopausal women.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨手法复位联合椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性压缩性骨折的临床效果。
    方法:将2022年1月至2024年3月收治的61例OVCFs患者随机分为自制脊柱定位器定位手法复位组(治疗组)和传统Kirchner定位组(对照组)。治疗组30例,包括4名男性和26名女性,年龄61至87岁,平均(73.61±7.17)岁;体重指数(BMI)在15.24至28.89kg·m-2之间,平均为(23.90±3.20)kg·m-2;骨密度T值在-4.90至-2.50SD之间,平均为(-3.43±0.75)SD;骨折至手术时间为6.50(4.00,Ⅰ为10.25)13例患者为Ⅱ级,根据Genant骨折压缩分类,7例患者为Ⅲ级。对照组31例,包括7名男性和24名女性,年龄61至89岁,平均(73.63±8.77)岁;BMI范围为18.43至27.06kg·m-2,平均(23.67±2.35)kg·m-2;骨密度T值范围为-4.60至-2.50SD,平均SD为(-3.30±0.68)SD;骨折至手术时间为6.00(3.00,8.00,Ⅰ级);9例患者为Ⅱ级,根据Genant骨折压缩分类,11例患者为Ⅲ级。穿刺次数,观察并比较两组患者的X线透视次数和穿刺时间。视觉模拟量表(VAS)术前观察并比较日本骨科协会(JOA)和定时试验(TUGT),术后3d和1个月。
    结果:所有患者均获随访1~3个月,平均(2.10±0.80)个月。穿刺次数,治疗组的X线透视次数和穿刺时间分别为5.00(4.00,6.00)次,(29.53±5.89)次,14.83(12.42,21.20)min,分别,对照组为7.00(6.00,8.00)倍,(34.58±5.33)次,22.19(17.33,27.01)分钟,治疗组优于对照组(P<0.05)。术前VAS无显著差异,两组间JOA、TUGT比较(P>0.05)。VAS,两组患者术后JOA、TUGT均明显改善(P<0.05)。手术后的第三天,治疗组JOA评分为23.00(20.75,25.00),高于对照组20.00(19.00、23.00)(P<0.05)。治疗组的TUGT为6.26(5.86,6.57)s,治疗组优于对照组6.90(6.80,7.14)s(P<0.05)。治疗组1例发生骨水泥渗漏,对照组2例发生骨水泥渗漏。
    结论:针对OVCF患者,采用自制脊柱定位器定位下行椎体成形术结合中药复位手法的最佳方案,可减少术中穿刺次数。缩短穿刺次数,减少X射线透视次数,与Kirschn针的简单定位相比,在恢复术后患者的短期腰椎功能和站立和行走能力方面具有优势。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore clinical effect of manipulation reduction combined with vertebral plasty on osteoporotic compression fractures (OVCFs).
    METHODS: Totally 61 patients with OVCFs treated from January 2022 to March 2024 were randomly divided into self-made spinal locator positioning with manipulation reduction group (treatment group) and traditional Kirchner positioning group (control group). There were 30 patients in treatment group, including 4 males and 26 females, aged from 61 to 87 years old with an average of (73.61±7.17) years old;body mass index (BMI) ranged from 15.24 to 28.89 kg·m-2 with an average of (23.90±3.20) kg·m-2;bone mineral density T value ranged from -4.90 to -2.50 SD with an avergae of (-3.43±0.75) SD;fracture to operation time was 6.50 (4.00, 10.25) d;10 patients were gradeⅠ, 13 patients were gradeⅡ, and 7 patients were grade Ⅲ according to Genant classification of fracture compression. There were 31 patients in control group, including 7 males and 24 females, aged from 61 to 89 years old with an average of (73.63±8.77) years old;BMI ranged from 18.43 to 27.06 kg·m-2 with an average of (23.67±2.35) kg·m-2;bone mineral density T value ranged from -4.60 to -2.50 SD with an avergae of (-3.30±0.68) SD;fracture to operation time was 6.00 (3.00, 8.00) d;11 patients were gradeⅠ, 9 patients were gradeⅡ, and 11 patients were grade Ⅲ according to Genant classification of fracture compression. The puncture times, X-ray fluoroscopy times and puncture time between two groups were observed and compared. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and timed up and go test (TUGT) were observed and compared before operation, 3 d and 1 month after operation.
    RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 1 to 3 months with an average of (2.10±0.80) months. Puncture times, X-ray fluorosecopy times and puncture time in treatment group were 5.00(4.00, 6.00) times, (29.53±5.89) times and 14.83(12.42, 21.20) min, respectively, while those in control group were 7.00(6.00, 8.00) times, (34.58±5.33) times, 22.19(17.33, 27.01) min, treatment group was better than those of control group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in preoperative VAS, JOA and TUGT between two groups(P>0.05). VAS, JOA and TUGT in both groups were significantly improved after opeation(P<0.05). On the third day after operation, JOA score of treatment group was 23.00 (20.75, 25.00), which was higher than that of control group 20.00(19.00, 23.00)(P<0.05). TUGT of treatment group was 6.26(5.86, 6.57) s, which was better than that of control group 6.90(6.80, 7.14) s (P<0.05). Bone cement leakage occurred with 1 patient in treatment group and 2 patients in control group.
    CONCLUSIONS: The optimal scheme of self-made spinal locators for locating descending verteboplasty combined with traditional Chinese medicine reduction manipulation for OVCF patients could reduce the number of intraoperative puncture times, shorten puncture times and reduce number of X-ray fluoroscopy times, and have advantages over the simple positioning of Kirschn\'s needle in restoring short-term lumbar function and standing and walking ability of postoperative patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:分析脊柱侧凸与骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCFs)患者经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)后椎体再骨折的关系。
    方法:对2014年1月至2022年10月符合该标准的269例患者进行了回顾性研究。所有患者均行PKP,资料完整,随访时间>12个月。首先,在269例患者中证实脊柱侧弯是一个危险因素.第二,根据Cobb角对脊柱侧凸患者进行分组,以评估术后角度的影响.采用Cox比例风险回归分析和生存分析计算风险比和复发时间。
    结果:共有56例脊柱侧凸,其中18人在PKP后经历了折射。椎体折返的危险因素包括T评分<-3.0和脊柱侧凸的存在(均p<0.001)。结果表明,椎体骨折弧(T10-L4)在脊柱侧凸和椎体骨折中有很高的影响。当脊柱侧凸和最初骨折的椎骨位于T10-L4内时,椎骨再骨折的危险因素包括术后Cobb角≥20°(p=0.002)和角度增加(p=0.001)。平均复发时间为17.2(10.7-23.7)个月和17.6(7.9-27.3)个月,分别。
    结论:骨质疏松合并脊柱侧凸可显著增加OVCFs患者PKP术后椎体折返的风险。当脊柱侧凸和最初骨折的椎骨位于T10-L4内时,术后Cobb角≥20°和角度增加是椎骨折返的重要危险因素。
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between scoliosis and vertebral refracture after percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).
    METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 269 patients meeting the criteria from January 2014 to October 2022. All patients underwent PKP with complete data and were followed-up for > 12 months. First, it was verified that scoliosis was a risk factor in 269 patients. Second, patients with scoliosis were grouped based on the Cobb angle to evaluate the impact of the post-operative angle. The cox proportional hazards regression analysis and survival analysis were used to calculate the hazard ratio and recurrence time.
    RESULTS: A total of 56 patients had scoliosis, 18 of whom experienced refractures after PKP. The risk factors for vertebral refractures included a T-score < - 3.0 and presence of scoliosis (both p < 0.001). The results indicated that the vertebral fractured arc (T10 - L4) was highly influential in scoliosis and vertebral fractures. When scoliotic and initially fractured vertebrae were situated within T10 - L4, the risk factors for vertebral refracture included a postoperative Cobb angle of ≥ 20° (p = 0.002) and an increased angle (p = 0.001). The mean recurrence times were 17.2 (10.7 - 23.7) months and 17.6 (7.9 - 27.3) months, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporosis combined with scoliosis significantly increases the risk of vertebral refractures after PKP in patients with OVCFs. A postoperative Cobb angle of ≥ 20° and an increased angle are significant risk factors for vertebral refractures when scoliotic and initially fractured vertebrae are situated within T10 - L4.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:早期评估骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)骨不连的风险有利于早期临床决策。然而,缺乏对OVCF骨不连危险因素的全面了解.
    方法:我们进行了一项病例对照研究,以调查OVCF骨不连的危险因素。在2011年1月至2021年12月期间接受非联合OVCF手术的患者有资格作为病例纳入。在同一时期通过MRI证实OVCF成功愈合的患者被确定为对照。患者人口统计学,合并症,提取空腹血液检测数据进行分析。
    结果:共纳入201例非联合OVCF患者和1044例对照,以评估非联合OVCF的危险因素。性别差异有统计学意义,年龄,高血压患者的数量,比较两组OVCF后卧床患者人数及BMDT评分。Logistic回归分析显示,女性患者发生OVCF骨不连的风险高于男性患者,饮酒,糖尿病,高血压是OVCF骨不连的危险因素,卧床休息和脊柱支持是防止OVCF骨不连的保护因素。我们还发现年龄,BMD,FBG,β-CTX与非联合OVCFs呈正相关,HGB和1,25-(OH)2VitD3水平与非联合OVCFs呈负相关。
    结论:吸烟,饮酒,糖尿病和高血压是OVCF骨不连的危险因素,卧床休息和脊柱支持是防止OVCF骨不连的保护因素。年龄,BMD,FBG和β-CTX与非联合OVCFs呈正相关,而HGB和1,25-(OH)2VitD3水平与OVCFs不一致呈负相关。根据我们的研究结果,我们建议卧床休息或脊柱支撑至少连续3周对于降低OVCF骨不连的风险是必要的.
    BACKGROUND: Early assessment of the risk of nonunion in osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) is beneficial to early clinical decision making. However, a comprehensive understanding of the risk factors for OVCF nonunion is lacking.
    METHODS: We conducted a case-control study to investigate risk factors for OVCF nonunion. Patients who underwent surgery for nonunited OVCFs between January 2011 and December 2021 were eligible for inclusion as cases. Patients with successful OVCF healing confirmed by MRI over the same period were identified as controls. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and fasting blood test data were extracted for analysis.
    RESULTS: A total of 201 patients with nonunited OVCFs and 1044 controls were included to evaluate the risk factors for nonunited OVCFs. There were statistically significant differences in sex, age, number of patients with hypertension, number of patients on bed rest after OVCF and T-score of BMD between the two groups. Logistic regression showed that female patients had a higher risk of OVCF nonunion than male patients and that smoking, drinking, diabetes, and hypertension were risk factors for nonunion of OVCFs, while bed rest and spinal support were protective factors against nonunion of OVCFs. We also found that age, BMD, FBG, and β-CTX were positively correlated with nonunited OVCFs, and that HGB and 1,25-(OH)2VitD3 level were negatively correlated with nonunited OVCFs.
    CONCLUSIONS: Smoking, drinking, diabetes and hypertension were risk factors for nonunion of OVCFs, while bed rest and spinal support were protective factors against nonunion of OVCFs. Age, BMD, FBG and β-CTX were positively correlated with nonunited OVCFs, while HGB and 1,25-(OH)2VitD3 level were negatively correlated with nonunited OVCFs. Based on the results of our study, we suggest that bed rest or spinal support for at least 3 consecutive weeks is necessary to reduce the risk of OVCFs nonunion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:建立猪骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCF)模型,比较采用轨迹可调骨水泥填充装置单侧椎体成形术与传统手术工具对椎体生物力学的影响。
    方法:用24个新鲜成年猪椎骨建立OVCF模型。标本分为四组(A,B,C,andD),每个由六个椎骨组成。A组为对照组,无椎体扩张术(PVP)。B组患者使用常规手术工具进行单侧PVP,而C组患者使用相同工具进行双侧PVP。D组,患者使用轨迹可调骨水泥填充装置进行单侧PVP.术后进行X射线检查以评估骨水泥分布和渗漏。使用电子机械试验机评估每个脊柱单元的压缩刚度和强度。
    结果:在B组中,C,D,水泥总分布面积百分比为32.83±3.64%,45.73±2.27%,和47.43±3.51%,分别。C组和D组明显高于B组(P<0.05),C组与D组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。B组椎体扩张后的僵硬度,C,D为1.04±0.23kN/mm,1.11±0.16KN/mm,1.15±0.13KN/mm,分别,显著大于A组(0.46±0.06kN/mm;P<0.05)。B组的极限抗压强度,C,D为2.53±0.21MPa,4.09±0.30MPa,3.99±0.29MPa,分别,均超过A组1.41±0.31MPa的强度。此外,C组和D组的极限抗压强度均显著高于B组(P<0.05).
    结论:轨迹可调的骨水泥填充装置被证明是单侧椎体成形术的有效方法,恢复骨折椎骨的生物力学特性。与传统手术工具相比,这种方法优于单侧穿刺,结果与双侧穿刺相当.此外,该装置确保了骨水泥的中心对称分布模式,导致形态改善。
    To establish a porcine osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model and compare the impact of unilateral vertebroplasty using trajectory-adjustable bone cement filling device to traditional surgical tools on vertebral biomechanics.
    Twenty-four fresh adult porcine vertebrae were used to establish an osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model. The specimens were divided into 4 groups (A, B, C, and D), each consisting of 6 vertebrae. Group A served as the control group without vertebral augmentation (percutaneous vertebroplasty [PVP]). Patients in Group B underwent unilateral PVP using conventional surgical tools, while patients in Group C underwent bilateral PVP using the same tools. In Group D, patients underwent unilateral PVP with a trajectory-adjustable bone cement filling device. Postoperative X-ray examinations were performed to assess cement distribution and leakage. The compressive stiffness and strength of each spinal unit were evaluated using an electronic mechanical testing machine.
    In Groups B, C, and D, the percentages of total cement distribution area were 32.83 ± 3.64%, 45.73 ± 2.27%, and 47.43 ± 3.51%, respectively. The values were significantly greater in Groups C and D than in Group B (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between Groups C and D (P > 0.05). The stiffness after vertebral augmentation in Groups B, C, and D was 1.04 ± 0.23 kN/mm, 1.11 ± 0.16 KN/mm, and 1.15 ± 0.13 KN/mm, respectively, which were significantly greater than that in Group A (0.46 ± 0.06 kN/mm; P < 0.05). The ultimate compressive strengths in Groups B, C, and D were 2.53 ± 0.21 MPa, 4.09 ± 0.30 MPa, and 3.99 ± 0.29 MPa, respectively, all surpassing Group A\'s strength of 1.41 ± 0.31 MPa. Additionally, both Groups C and D demonstrated significantly greater ultimate compressive strengths than Group B did (P < 0.05).
    A trajectory-adjustable bone cement filling device was proven to be an effective approach for unilateral vertebroplasty, restoring the biomechanical properties of fractured vertebrae. Compared to traditional surgical tools, this approach is superior to unilateral puncture and yields outcomes comparable to those of bilateral puncture. Additionally, the device ensures a centrally symmetrical distribution pattern of bone cement, leading to improved morphology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨OVCF患者PVP术后残余背痛的危险因素。
    方法:我们回顾性回顾了2015年1月至2020年1月使用PVP治疗的675例OVCF患者的记录。通过VAS评分评估术后背痛强度。残余背痛定义为存在术后中度至重度疼痛(平均VAS评分≥4),变量包括患者特征,基线症状,影像学数据和手术相关因素。通过单因素和多因素logistic回归分析确定危险因素。
    结果:纳入研究的675例患者中,有46例出现了残余背痛,发病率为6.8%。多因素Logistic回归分析显示Pre-BMD较低(OR=3.576,P=0.041),多椎体骨折(OR=2.795,P=0.026),后筋膜损伤(OR=4.083,P=0.032),水泥扩散体积率<0.2(OR=3.507,P=0.013),关节面侵犯(OR=11.204,P<0.001),抑郁(OR=3.562,P=0.035)与PVP术后残余背痛呈正相关。
    结论:低前骨密度,多发性椎骨骨折,后筋膜损伤,骨水泥扩散体积率<0.2,小关节侵犯和抑郁是PVP术后残余背痛的独立危险因素。
    To explore the risk factors of residual back pain after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF).
    We retrospectively reviewed the records of 675 patients with OVCF treated with PVP from January 2015 to January 2020. Postoperative back pain intensity was assessed by the VAS score. Residual back pain was defined as the presence of postoperative moderate-severe pain (average VAS score≥4), and the variables included patient characteristics, baseline symptoms, imaging data and operation-related factors. Risk factors were identified with univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.
    Residual back pain occurred in 46 of the 675 patients included in the study, with an incidence rate of 6.8%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that low Pre-BMD (OR = 3.576, P = 0.041), multiple vertebral fractures (OR = 2.795, P = 0.026), posterior fascia injury (OR = 4.083, P = 0.032), cement diffusion volume rate <0.2 (OR = 3.507, P = 0.013), facet joint violation (OR = 11.204, P < 0.001), and depression (OR = 3.562, P = 0.035) were positively correlated with residual back pain after PVP.
    Low pre-BMD (pre-bone mineral density), multiple vertebral fractures, posterior fascia injury, cement diffusion volume rate <0.2, facet joint violation and depression were the independent risk factors of residual back pain after PVP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:骨水泥分布是影响骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)椎体强化治疗的疼痛缓解和长期预后的重要因素。单侧经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)是最常见的手术,骨水泥分布不足比双侧PKP更常见。然而,仍然缺乏有效的补救措施。在这项研究中,通过调整工作通道,然后在水泥分配不足的情况下进行第二次水泥注入作为补救措施,实现了足够的水泥分配,目的是通过回顾性队列研究评估临床结局.
    方法:从2017年7月1日至2020年7月31日,接受单侧PKP治疗的OVCF患者被纳入这项回顾性队列研究。根据骨水泥分布(当水泥未超过前膜中椎体的中线或/和水泥未接触侧膜中的上/下椎体终板时,确认水泥分布不足。)以及是否在手术过程中进行了第二次注射,患者分为三组。不足组:经透视或术后X线证实骨水泥分布不足的患者。第二注射组:术中发现骨水泥分布不足的患者,并进行第二次注射以改善水泥分布。
    方法:在一次注射中具有足够骨水泥分布的患者。主要结果是骨水泥椎体再塌陷率。次要结果包括手术时间,辐射暴露,水泥渗漏率,VAS,ODI,和相邻椎体骨折率。
    结果:不足组34例,第二注射组45例,对照组241例。三组患者基线资料及随访时间差异无统计学意义。
    方法:注射不足组的伤椎再塌陷率明显高于第二注射组(42.22%vs20.59%,P=0.000)和对照组(42.22%vs.18.26%,P=0.000)。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,第二次注射组与对照组的生存时间差异无统计学意义(P=0.741,Log-rank检验)。两者均显著低于不足组(P=0.032和0.000)。
    结果:二次注射组与对照组术后VAS评分和ODI比较差异无统计学意义。两者均优于不足组(P=0.000)。在最后的后续行动中,三组间VAS和ODI比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。二次注射组的手术时间明显高于不足组(53.41±8.85vs44.18±7.41,P=0.000)和对照组(53.41±8.85vs44.28±7.22,P=0.000)。第二注射组的辐射暴露量明显高于不足组(40.09±8.39vs30.38±6.87,P=0.000)和对照组(40.09±8.39vs31.31±6.49,P=0.000)。第二注射组的骨水泥渗漏率(20.59%)与不足组(24.44%)和对照组(21.26%)相当(P=0.877)。第二注射组的住院时间(4.38±1.72)与不足组(4.18±1.60)和对照组(4.52±1.46)相当(P=0.431)。
    结论:当单侧PKP过程中水泥分布不足时,第二次注射可以缓解早期疼痛,减少骨水泥椎体再塌陷和相邻椎体骨折的发生率,在不增加水泥渗漏率的情况下,尽管此程序可能会增加手术时间和辐射暴露。
    BACKGROUND: Bone cement distribution is an important factor affecting pain relief and long-term prognosis of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) treated with vertebral augmentation. Unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) is the most common procedure, and insufficient bone cement distribution is more common than bilateral PKP. However, effective remedies are remain lack. In this study, sufficient cement distribution was achieved by adjusting the working channel followed by second cement injection as a remedy in cases with insufficient cement distribution, and the purpose was to evaluate the clinical outcomes by a retrospective cohort study.
    METHODS: From July 1, 2017 to July 31, 2020, OVCF patients treated with unilateral PKP were included in this retrospective cohort study. According to the bone cement distribution (insufficient cement distribution was confirmed when the cement did not exceed the mid line of the vertebral body in frontal film or/and the cement did not contact the upper/lower vertebral endplates in the lateral film.) and whether second injection was performed during surgery, the patients were divided into three groups. Insufficient group: patients with insufficient cement distribution confirmed by fluoroscopy or postoperative x-ray. Second injection group: patients with insufficient cement distribution was found during the procedure, and second injection was performed to improve the cement distribution.
    METHODS: patients with sufficient cement distribution in one injection. The Primary outcome was cemented vertebrae re-collapse rate. The secondary outcomes included operative time, radiation exposure, cement leakage rate, VAS, ODI, and adjacent vertebral fracture rate.
    RESULTS: There are 34 cases in insufficient group, 45 cases in second injection group, and 241 cases in control group. There was no significant difference in baseline data and follow-up time among the three groups.
    METHODS: The injured vertebrae re-collapse rate of insufficient group was significantly higher than that of second injection group (42.22% vs 20.59%, P = 0.000) and control group (42.22% vs. 18.26%, P = 0.000). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the survival time between second injection group and control group (P = 0.741, Log-rank test), both of which were significant less than that in insufficient group (P = 0.032 and 0.000, respectively).
    RESULTS: There was no significant difference in VAS score and ODI after operation between second injection group and control group, both of which were superior to those in insufficient group (P = 0.000). At the final follow-up, there was no significant difference in VAS and ODI among the three groups (P > 0.05). The operation time of second injection group was significantly higher than that of insufficient group (53.41 ± 8.85 vs 44.18 ± 7.41, P = 0.000) and control group (53.41 ± 8.85 vs 44.28 ± 7.22, P = 0.000). The radiation exposure of the second injection group was significantly higher than that of insufficient group (40.09 ± 8.39 vs 30.38 ± 6.87, P = 0.000) and control group (40.09 ± 8.39 vs 31.31 ± 6.49, P = 0.000). The cement leakage rate of second injection group (20.59%) was comparable with that of insufficient group (24.44%) and control group (21.26%) (P = 0.877). The length of hospital stay of the second injection group (4.38 ± 1.72) was comparable with that of insufficient group (4.18 ± 1.60) and control group (4.52 ± 1.46) (P = 0.431).
    CONCLUSIONS: When cement distribution is insufficient during unilateral PKP, second injection may relieve early pain, reduce the incidence of cemented vertebral re-collapse and adjacent vertebral fracture, without increasing the cement leakage rate, although this procedure may increase the operation time and radiation exposure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评价传统经椎弓根入路(CTA)或基底横突-椎弓根入路(BTPA)经皮椎体成形术(PVP)治疗椎弓根狭窄的胸腰椎骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(TL-OVCFs)的疗效。
    方法:对椎弓根狭窄的TL-OVCF进行了回顾性研究,其中CTA78例,BTPA84例。手术结果,射线照相参数[椎弓根的宽度和高度(PW,PH),穿刺倾角(PIA)]和临床指标[视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,比较两组的Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)]。
    结果:就其手术结果而言,手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而骨水泥的体积,CTA组的骨水泥渗漏发生率和骨水泥良好分布率明显较差(4.4±0.6mlvs.5.5±0.5ml,37.2%vs.20.2%,52.6%vs.79.8%,P<0.05)。至于影像学参数和临床指标,在PH中没有观察到差异,PW,术前VAS评分和ODI(P>0.05),而PIA,BTPA组术后1天的VAS评分和ODI明显更好(17.3±2.1°vs.29.6±2.8°,2.7±0.7vs.2.1±0.8,32.8±4.6vs.26.7±4.0,P<0.05)。
    结论:该研究提供了确凿的证据,表明PVP与BTPA在治疗狭窄椎弓根的TL-OVCFs方面具有更多优势,能更好地缓解术后疼痛。
    To evaluate the effects of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) with conventional transpedicle approach (CTA) or basal transverse process-pedicle approach (BTPA) on the treatment of thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (TL-OVCFs) with narrow pedicles.
    A retrospective study of TL-OVCFs with narrow pedicles was performed, including 78 cases of CTA and 84 cases of BTPA. The surgical outcomes, radiographic parameters [the width and height of the pedicle (PW, PH), the inclination angle of puncture (PIA)] and clinical indicators [visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)] of two groups were compared.
    In terms of surgical outcomes of them, there was no difference in operation time (P > 0.05), while the volume of bone cement, the incidence of bone cement leakage and rate of good bone cement distribution were significantly worse in the CTA group (4.4 ± 0.6 ml vs. 5.5 ± 0.5 ml, 37.2% vs. 20.2%, 52.6% vs. 79.8%, P < 0.05). As for radiographic parameters and clinical indicators of them, the differences were not observed in the PH, PW, preoperative VAS score and ODI (P > 0.05), whereas the PIA, VAS score and ODI at 1 day postoperatively were significantly better in the BTPA group (17.3 ± 2.1° vs. 29.6 ± 2.8°, 2.7 ± 0.7 vs. 2.1 ± 0.8, 32.8 ± 4.6 vs. 26.7 ± 4.0, P < 0.05).
    The study provided solid evidence that PVP with BTPA had more advantages in the treatment of TL-OVCFs with narrow pedicles, which can better relieve postoperative pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨动态骨折活动度是否会影响急性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)患者保守治疗的效果。
    方法:对我院因疼痛性OVCFs行保守治疗的158例患者进行回顾性分析。根据疼痛缓解的程度,将患者分为疗效优组和疗效差组。记录每位患者可能影响保守治疗结果的因素。将两组之间具有统计学差异的变量输入多变量logistic回归分析,以确定影响保守治疗结果的因素。还进行了受试者操作特征曲线(ROC)分析。
    结果:结果显示动态骨折活动性,超重,年龄和BMD(均P<0.001)是影响保守治疗结果的独立因素。ROC分析显示,预测治疗效果的年龄和BMD的临界值分别为72.5岁和-3.30。
    结论:本研究证实,动态骨折活动度可作为预测急性OVCF患者保守治疗结果的独立因素。还证明了超重,年龄和BMD是影响保守治疗结果的其他独立因素.综合评价这些相关因素可以指导医生对独特的急性OCVF采取适当的治疗方法。
    To investigate whether dynamic fracture mobility could affect the outcome of conservative treatment in patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF).
    A total of 158 patients who underwent conservative treatment in our hospital for painful OVCFs were included in this study and their data were retrospectively analyzed. According to the degree of pain relief, patients were divided into an excellent efficacy group and a poor efficacy group. Factors that may affect the outcome of conservative treatment were recorded for each patient. Variables with a statistical difference between the 2 groups were entered into multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify the factors influencing the outcome of conservative treatment. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was also performed.
    The result showed that dynamic fracture mobility, overweight, age, and bone mineral density (BMD) (all P <  0.001) were independent factors influencing the outcome of conservative treatment. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the cutoff values for age and BMD that predicted treatment effect were 72.5 years and -3.30, respectively.
    This study confirmed that dynamic fracture mobility could be used as an independent factor predicting the outcome of conservative treatment in patients with acute OVCFs. It was also shown that overweight, age, and BMD were other independent factors influencing the outcome of conservative treatment. A comprehensive evaluation of these related factors can guide the doctor to take appropriate treatment for a unique acute OCVF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号