In this review and meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate the effect of spine orthotics in osteoporotic patients. The relationship between osteoporosis, osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs), and age-related hyperkyphosis has made this effect unclear. We believe that taking participants\' conditions into consideration may help to alleviate this controversy. The electronic database includes Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, and ClinicalTrials.gov. For English language literature was searched up to March 2023, and 34 articles were included in the review and 15 article had sufficient quality for meta-analysis based on the methodology quality index. There was no significant effect found from using either rigid or soft orthoses alone during the acute phase of one level (OVFs). Both semi-rigid and weighted orthoses have shown a positive significant effect on thoracic kyphosis angle and back extensor muscle strength in osteoporotic or older hyperkyphotic patients. The results of this review indicate that using a soft or rigid orthosis alone does not have a superior effect in the acute phase of one-level (OVFs) compared to not using an orthosis. However, using a semi-rigid or weighted orthosis in osteoporotic or hyperkyphotic older adults with or without (OVFs) can benefit thoracic kyphosis angle, back muscle strength, and balance.

UNASSIGNED: Age-related postural hyper-kyphosis is an exaggerated anterior curvature of the thoracic spine, that impairs balance and increases the risk of falls and fractures in elderly subjects. Our objectives are to review the effect of elderly-specific spinal orthoses on muscle function and kyphosis angle in this subjects.
UNASSIGNED: We searched PubMed, Scopus, ISI web of Knowledge, ProQuest and Cochrane library to identify relevant studies that assessed efficacy of spinal orthoses on muscle function and kyphosis angle of elderly subjects with elderly with hyper-kyphosis. Quality assessment was implemented using the Downs and Black scale.
UNASSIGNED: Results for 709 individuals were described in 18 articles which 12 studies involved RCT. There was significant difference for kyphosis angle after use of orthosis of 148 participants (SMD: -3.79, 95% CI -7.02 to -0.56, p < 0.01). Except one study, all of studies showed significantly increased on the back muscle strength when the participants wore the spinal orthosis and this effect was significantly better in long-term follow up (MD: 84.73; 95% CIs, 23.24 to 146.23; p < 0.01). In the outcome of pain, the efficacy brought by orthosis was large and significant (SMD: -1.66; 95% CIs, -2.39 to 0.94; p < 0.01).
UNASSIGNED: Spinal orthosis may be an effective treatment for elderly hyper-kyphosis. However, the small number, and heterogeneity of the included studies, indicate that higher-quality studies should be conducted to verify the effectiveness and orthosis in hyper-kyphosis.
Age-related postural hyper kyphosis is an exaggerated anterior curvature of the thoracic spine, that impairs balance and increases the risk of falls and fractures in elderly subjects.Based on the findings of this review, elderly specific spinal orthoses may be recommended as effective device for elderly hyper kyphotic subjects.Spinal orthoses prescription is important for health practitioners to consider when planning treatment.

BACKGROUND: Current protocols on cervical immobilization postcervical spine fracture are widely accepted in the acute rehabilitation of older adults, however consensus on its overall effectiveness remains lacking.
OBJECTIVE: Summarize information from original studies on available cervical immobilization protocols following a cervical fracture and to answer the questions; Which types of study designs have been used to assess the effectiveness of these protocols? What are the currently reported cervical immobilization protocols following cervical fracture in adults? What is the effectiveness of these protocols? What adverse events are associated with these protocols?
METHODS: Scoping review was performed.
METHODS: Searches were performed on the following online databases from inception to February 23, 2023: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL. Databases were searched for articles pertaining to collar use post cervical spine fracture.
METHODS: Effectiveness of the cervical fracture immobilization protocols was the primary outcome, examined by various measures including union rates and disability indexes.
METHODS: 4 databases were searched; EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) beginning on February 23, 2023, where 5,127 studies were yielded and 32 were extracted based on studies of adults (≥18 years) with a diagnosis of a cervical fracture (C0-C7) managed with a rigid external orthosis to prevent instability and surgery (collar, or cervicothoracic orthosis). Risk of bias was assessed using the guidelines set out by the Joanna Briggs Institute.
RESULTS: This scoping review yielded low-level prospective (18%) and retrospective (69%) cohort studies, case-control studies (3%), and case series (6%) from 1987 to 2022, patient age ranged from 14 to 104 years. Findings were difficult to summarize based on the lack of randomized controlled trials, leading to no clear conclusions drawn on the presence of standardized cervical immobilization protocols with no information on the duration of treatment or transition in care. Most included articles were retrospective cohort studies of poor to moderate quality, which have significant risk of bias for intervention questions. The effectiveness of these protocols remains unclear as most studies evaluated heterogeneous outcomes and did not present between-group differences. Mortality, musculoskeletal (MSK) complications, and delayed surgery were common adverse events associated with cervical collar use.
CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review highlights the need for higher levels of evidence as there is currently no standardized immobilization protocol for cervical spine fractures as a primary treatment, the effectiveness of cervical immobilization protocols is unclear, and mortality, MSK complications, and delayed surgery are common adverse events. No sources of funding were used for this scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Loss of hand function causes severe limitations in activity in daily living. The hand-soft robot is one of the methods that has recently been growing to increase the patient\'s independence. The purpose of the present systematic review was to provide a classification, a comparison, and a design overview of mechanisms and the efficacy of the soft hand robots to help researchers approach this field.
METHODS: The literature research regarding such tools was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials. We included peer-reviewed studies that considered a soft robot glove as an assistive device to provide function. The two investigators screened the titles and abstracts, then independently reviewed the full-text articles. Disagreements about inclusion were resolved by consensus or a third reviewer.
RESULTS: A total of 15 articles were identified, describing 210 participants (23 healthy subjects). The tools were in three categories according to their actuation type (pneumatic system, cable-driven, another design). The most critical outcomes in studies included functional tasks (fourteen studies), grip strength (four studies), range of motion (ROM) (five studies), and user satisfaction (five studies).
CONCLUSIONS: Function and grip parameters are the most common critical parameters for tests of hand robots. Cable-driven transmission and soft pneumatic actuators are the most common choices for the actuation unit. Radder et al. study had the highest grade from other studies. That was the only RCT among studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Although few soft robotic gloves can be considered ready to reach the market, it seems these tools have the potential to be practical for people with a disability. But, we lack consistent evidence of comparing two or more soft robot gloves on the hand functions. Future research needs to assess the effect of soft robotic gloves on people with hand disorders with more populations.

UNASSIGNED: Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common motor disability in children. The initial lesion to the developing brain may result in a myriad of neuromuscular comorbidities, including mobility deficiencies. The neuromuscular contributions to disability and rehabilitative frameworks specific to children with CP have been investigated separately. However, few reviews have examined the relationship between neuromuscular pathophysiology and rehabilitative frameworks among children with CP. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to investigate the impact of dynamic stretching orthoses and therapeutic exercise on range of motion (ROM), aerobic capacity, and mobility in relation to the neuromuscular contributions to disability in children with CP.
UNASSIGNED: Reviews of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science were conducted to identify literature focusing on the neuromuscular pathophysiology contributing to disability in children with CP and rehabilitative frameworks associated with this population. The search used a combination of keywords and subject headings to include \'cerebral palsy\', \'musculoskeletal\', \'neuromuscular\', \'spasticity\', \'rehabilitation\', \'exercise\', \'aerobic\', and \'orthosis\'. Selected manuscripts featured original cross-sectional and longitudinal research and meta-analyses.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 303 manuscripts were initially identified through search terms, with 182 articles excluded based on title and abstract evaluation, leaving 121 manuscripts for full-text analysis. Seven studies meeting the narrative review criteria were included. Evidence supporting the efficacy of dynamic stretching orthoses for improving lower extremity ROM is inconclusive. Aerobic and progressive resistive training may be beneficial for improving aerobic capacity and muscle strength in children with CP, which may result in enhanced mobility.
UNASSIGNED: Depending on the individual\'s clinical presentation, ROM and therapeutic exercise may be implemented to optimize function. Incorporating progressive resistive and aerobic exercises into a rehabilitation plan may improve mobility and aerobic capacity. As such, clinicians should consider resistance and aerobic exercise prescription as part of a long-term treatment plan for children with CP.

The management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) in the elderly includes nonoperative treatment and vertebroplasty, but has not been established due to the diversity of patient backgrounds. The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of 3 treatment modalities for the management of OVF: orthotic treatment, percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), and balloon kyphoplasty (BKP). The method was based on an analysis of the latest RCTs, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews on these topics. No study showed a benefit of bracing with high level of evidence. Trials were found that showed comparable outcomes without orthotic treatment. Only 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) showed an improvement in pain relief up to 6 months compared with no orthosis. Rigid and nonrigid orthoses were equally effective. Four of 5 RCTs comparing vertebroplasty and sham surgery were equally effective, and one RCT showed superior pain relief with vertebroplasty within 3 weeks of onset. In open trials comparing vertebroplasty with nonoperative management, vertebroplasty was superior. PVP and BKP were comparable in terms of pain relief, improvement in quality of life, and adjacent vertebral fractures. BKP does not affect global sagittal alignment, although BKP may restore vertebral body height. An RCT was published showing that PVP was effective in chronic cases without pain relief. Vertebroplasty improved life expectancy by 22% at 10 years. The superiority of orthotic therapy for OVF was seen only in short-term pain relief. Soft orthoses proved to be a viable alternative to rigid orthoses. Vertebroplasty within 3 weeks may be useful. There is no significant difference in clinical efficacy between PVP and BKP. Vertebroplasty improves life expectancy.

UNASSIGNED: Relative motion splinting has been used successfully in the treatment of extensor tendon repairs and has recently been applied in flexor tendon rehabilitation. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify articles reporting use of relative motion flexion (RMF) splinting following flexor tendon repair and to examine indications for use and clinical outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Seven medical databases, four trials registries and three grey literature sources were systematically searched and screened against pre-specified eligibility criteria. Screening, data extraction and quality appraisal were independently performed by two reviewers.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 12 studies were identified, of which three met the review eligibility criteria: one retrospective case series; one cadaveric proof of concept study; and one ongoing prospective case series. The type of splint (including metacarpophalangeal joint position and available movement), exercise programme, and zone of tendon injury varied between studies. Both case series presented acceptable range of movement and grip strength outcomes. The prospective series reported one tendon rupture and two tenolysis procedures; the retrospective series reported no tendon ruptures or secondary surgeries.
UNASSIGNED: We found limited evidence supporting the use of RMF splinting in the rehabilitation of zones I-III flexor tendon repairs. Further prospective research with larger patient cohorts is required to assess the clinical outcomes, patient reported outcomes and safety of RMF splinting in comparison to other regimes. Application of the relative motion principles to flexor tendon splinting varied across the included studies, and we suggest an operational definition of relative motion in this context.

BACKGROUND: Orthosis (orthotic) fabrication is an essential part of the treatment plan for many upper extremity conditions.
OBJECTIVE: We aim to comprehensively identify the current body of evidence about the purpose, structure, scope, and application of available orthotic classification systems. Our secondary aim was to know if the current classification systems can be used as a decision guide for clinicians.
METHODS: A scoping review.
METHODS: A scoping review of research studies identified through data-based and gray literature was conducted to determine studies that addressed classification systems of the orthosis (orthotic) in the hand and upper limb. Two investigators screened study titles and abstracts and did the data extraction. To do a comprehensive review, all the hand therapy associations were contacted and asked to share their specific orthosis classification system. To answer our second aim, we discussed our findings with the experts in a panel.
RESULTS: Twelve different classification systems were identified, which were developed with different aims. Five classification systems classified orthosis based on their function (n = 5, 50%); one based on therapeutic goals and proposed a decision algorithm. Two of the proposed systems were aimed at helping in decision-making or offering an algorithm for therapists to help them choose the proper orthosis. The expert panel process identified that the current classification systems could not help clinicians select proper orthosis for their patients.
CONCLUSIONS: There are different classification systems which were developed with various aims. However, none of those can help clinicians make informed decisions about appropriate orthosis choices for their patients.

Orthoses are commonly prescribed to relieve symptoms for musculoskeletal and neurological conditions; however, patients stop wearing orthoses as recommended for many reasons. When considering the effectiveness of orthoses, there needs to be an objective way to monitor whether participants wear the orthosis as instructed, because if this is not followed, the orthoses will not work as intended. This review aimed to identify, summarise, and compare objective methods used to measure compliance with orthoses applied to the extremities. Databases (Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, and MEDLINE) were searched for eligible studies. Twenty-three studies were accepted in the final review, including five studies that employed upper limb orthoses, two that employed hip orthoses, and fifteen that employed lower limb orthoses. To measure compliance objectively, studies utilised temperature sensors, pressure sensors, accelerometers, a step counter, or a combination of sensors. All sensor types have their own advantages and disadvantages and should be chosen based on study-specific parameters. Sensor-derived monitoring provides quantitative, objective data that are beneficial in both clinical and research settings. The ideal solution to monitoring compliance would consist of both objective and user-reported aspects that, in combination, would provide an all-encompassing picture of the orthotic treatment prescribed.

BACKGROUND: Balance impairment is a contributing factor to falls. Falls are a leading cause of injury and death in older adults. An ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) is a device that can be prescribed as an intervention to help individuals with compromised balance to ambulate safely.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review was to investigate the role ankle-foot orthoses have in affecting balance in community-dwelling older adults.
METHODS: A scoping review was conducted searching MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and REHABDATA databases to obtain the appropriate literature to meet the following criteria: 1) quantitative research design; 2) studies with participants over age 65; 3) studies with participants with drop-foot or sensory deficits in the lower extremity; 4) the treatment intervention was unilateral or bilateral AFOs; 5) the outcome measure was balance or stability. The retrieved articles were assessed based on the internal validity, external validity, objectivity, and reliability of the study design and the interpretation of results.
RESULTS: 11 articles were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Four major themes emerged in the analysis about the impact that ankle-foot orthoses have on balance in older adults: (1) AFOs improved lateral stability, (2) AFOs improved balance under static conditions, (3) AFOs provided a reduction in postural sway and (4) AFOs increased walking speed in community-dwelling older adults.
CONCLUSIONS: The evidence from the findings of the review indicate that ankle-foot orthoses have a generally positive affect on balance in older adults. Clinicians can consider the ankle-foot orthosis an effective intervention that can improve balance in some older adult patient populations.