Occult nodal metastasis

隐匿性淋巴结转移
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在确定隐匿性淋巴结转移率(ONM),与ONM相关的危险因素,并比较区域复发(RR),选择性颈淋巴结清扫术(END)与期待治疗(OBS)治疗上颌骨和下颌骨的原发性T1-T2牙龈鳞状细胞癌(GSCC)的2年无病生存期(DFS)。
    进行了回顾性分析,包括2014年至2021年在三级转诊中心接受治疗的患者。
    20例患者接受了END,36例患者接受了预期治疗,平均随访28个月。在26%的研究队列中观察到ONM,其中上颌骨占16.7%,下颌骨占36.4%。没有特定的组织病理学特征可预测ONM。无区域性复发。END和OBS组的局部复发发生率分别为5%和2.8%。分别。两年的DFS在END(93.8%)与OBS(83.9%)以及上颌骨(90.9%)与下颌骨(83.4%)之间具有可比性,P>0.05。
    ONM在cT1-T2N0GSCC中保持可变,与上颌骨相比,下颌骨的发病率更高,分别。下颌GSCC应强烈考虑END。总的来说,N0颈部的END已显示提供显著的总体和无病生存益处。然而,需要进一步的前瞻性随机研究来验证ONM的危险因素,并验证该患者人群中择期颈清扫术的疾病相关生存获益.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to identify the rate of occult nodal metastasis (ONM), risk factors associated with ONM, and compare regional recurrence (RR), 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) in patients treated with elective neck dissection (END) versus expectant management (OBS) for primary T1-T2 gingival squamous cell carcinoma (GSCC) of the maxilla and mandible.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective analysis was conducted and included patients from 2014 to 2021 who were treated at a tertiary referral center.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty patients underwent END and 36 were managed expectantly, with a mean follow-up period of 28 months. ONM was observed in 26% of the study cohort with 16.7% occurring in the maxilla and 36.4% in the mandible. No specific histopathologic features were predictive for ONM. No regional recurrence occurred. Local recurrence occurred in 5% and 2.8% of END and OBS groups, respectively. Two-year DFS were comparable between the END (93.8%) versus OBS (83.9%) as well as maxilla (90.9%) versus mandible (83.4%), P > 0.05.
    UNASSIGNED: ONM remains variable in cT1-T2N0 GSCC with a greater incidence occurring in the mandible when compared to the maxilla, respectively. An END should be strongly considered for mandibular GSCC. Overall, END for the N0 neck has been shown to provide significant overall and disease-free survival benefits. However, further prospective randomized studies are needed to verify risk factors for ONM and validate the disease-related survival benefit of an elective neck dissection in this patient population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:根据NCCN指南,缺乏证据支持在早期口腔鳞状细胞癌(OCSCC)中使用选择性颈清扫术(END).我们试图检查根据AJCC分期手册定义的cT1N0M0OCSCC患者的END适应症,八版。
    方法:纳入研究的3886例cT1N0M0患者中,2065进行END和1821颈部观察。
    结果:在倾向评分匹配之前和之后接受END与颈部观察的患者的5年结局(n=1406)如下:颈部控制,96%/90%(匹配前),p<0.0001;96%/90%(匹配后),p<0.0001;疾病特异性生存率(DSS),93%/92%(匹配前),p=0.0227;93%/92%(匹配后),p=0.1436。多变量分析显示颈部观察,侵入深度(DOI)>2.5mm,分化差是5年结局的独立危险因素.在应用从0(无风险因素)到3(存在三个风险因素)的评分系统时,观察到以下5年比率:颈部控制,98%/95%/84%/85%;DSS,96%/93%/88%/85%;总生存率,90%/86%/79%/59%,分别(所有p<0.0001)。评分为0和1的患者的生存结果相似。整个研究队列中的隐匿性转移率,DOI>2.5mm,分化差为6.8%/9.2%/17.1%,分别。
    结论:因为所有接受颈部观察的患者得分为1分或更高,当存在DOI>2.5mm或低分化肿瘤时,应进行END。在这种情况下,48.6%(1888/3886)的cT1N0M0患者可以避免END而不损害肿瘤学结果。
    According to the NCCN guidelines, there is weak evidence to support the use of elective neck dissection (END) in early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). We sought to examine the indications for END in patients with cT1N0M0 OCSCC defined according to the AJCC Staging Manual, Eight Edition.
    Of the 3886 patients diagnosed with cT1N0M0 included in the study, 2065 underwent END and 1821 neck observation.
    The 5-year outcomes for patients who received END versus neck observation before and after propensity score matching (n = 1406 each) were as follows: neck control, 96 %/90 % (before matching), p < 0.0001; 96 %/90 % (after matching), p < 0.0001; disease-specific survival (DSS), 93 %/92 % (before matching), p = 0.0227; 93 %/92 % (after matching), p = 0.1436. Multivariable analyses revealed that neck observation, depth of invasion (DOI) > 2.5 mm, and poor differentiation were independent risk factors for 5-year outcomes. Upon the application of a scoring system ranging from 0 (no risk factor) to 3 (presence of the three risk factors), the following 5-year rates were observed: neck control, 98 %/95 %/84 %/85 %; DSS, 96 %/93 %/88 %/85 %; and overall survival, 90 %/86 %/79 %/59 %, respectively (all p < 0.0001). The survival outcomes of patients with scores of 0 and 1 were similar. The occult metastasis rates in the entire study cohort, DOI > 2.5 mm, and poor differentiation were 6.8 %/9.2 %/17.1 %, respectively.
    Because all patients who received neck observation had a score of 1 or higher, END should be performed when a DOI > 2.5 mm or poorly differentiated tumors are present. Under these circumstances, 48.6 % (1888/3886) of cT1N0M0 patients may avoid END without compromising oncological outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the therapeutic results between selective neck dissection (SND) and conversion modified radical neck dissection (MRND) for the occult nodal metastasis cases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
    METHODS: Forty-four cases with occult nodal metastasis were enrolled in this observational cohort study. For twenty-nine cases, SNDs were done and for fifteen cases, as metastatic nodes were found in the operative field, conversion from selective to MRNDs type II were done. Baseline data on primary site, T and N stage, extent of SND, extracapsular spread of occult metastatic node and type of postoperative adjuvant therapy were obtained. We compared locoregional control rate, overall survival rate and disease specific survival rate between two groups.
    RESULTS: Among the 29 patients who underwent SND, only one patient had a nodal recurrence which occurred in the contralateral undissected neck. On the other hand, among the 15 patients who underwent conversion MRND, two patients had nodal recurrences which occurred in previously undissected neck. According to the Kaplan Meier survival curve, there was no statistically significant difference for locoregional control rate, overall survival rate and disease specific survival rate between two groups (P=0.2719, P=0.7596, and P=0.2405, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: SND is enough to treat occult nodal metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and it is not necessary to convert from SND to comprehensive neck dissection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号