Multiple system atrophy

多系统萎缩
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究旨在比较第二个共识声明与运动障碍协会(MDS)多系统萎缩(MSA)标准在单个中国队列中的差异。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了过去5年的73例MSA患者。除了根据MDS标准临床确定的和临床可能的MSA之外,根据第二项共识声明,他们还被归类为可能和可能的MSA患者。核心临床,支持性临床,并对两种MSA亚型的影像学特征进行分析比较。
    结果:本研究共纳入40例MSA-P患者和33例MSA-C患者。在第二个共识声明中,大约78.7%的可能患者类别可被归类为MDS标准中的临床确定的MSA,并且在第二个共识声明标准中具有非支持特征的五名患者可被诊断为MDS标准中的临床可能的MSA。在运动发作的三年内,“快速进展”和“中度至重度姿势不稳定”在支持特征中占主导地位。大约78.9%的患者具有至少一种成像标记,在铁敏感序列上具有壳核的主要信号减少(38.0%的患者)。主要由于缺乏支持或影像学特征,无法将22例患者诊断为临床确定的MSA。
    结论:在两个标准集之间发现了高度的一致性。支持和影像学特征在MSA的诊断中起重要作用,并影响当前标准的诊断水平。
    This study aimed at comparing the differences between the second consensus statement and Movement Disorder Society (MDS) criteria for Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) in a single Chinese cohort.
    We retrospectively reviewed 73 patients with MSA over the past five years. They were categorized as patients with probable and possible MSA according to the second consensus statement in addition to clinically established and clinically probable MSA according to the MDS criteria. The core clinical, supportive clinical, and imaging features were analyzed and compared between the two MSA subtypes.
    A total of 40 patients with MSA-P and 33 patients with MSA-C were included in this study. Approximately 78.7% of the category of probable patients in the second consensus statement can be categorized as clinically established MSA in the MDS criteria and five patients with non-supporting features in the second consensus statement criteria can be diagnosed as clinically probable MSA in the MDS criteria. \"Rapid progression\" and \"moderate to severe postural instability\" within three years of motor onset dominated among the supportive features. Approximately 78.9% of patients possessed at least one imaging marker with predominant signal decrease of putamen on iron-sensitive sequences (38.0% of patients). Twenty-two patients could not be diagnosed as clinically established MSA mainly due to the lack of supportive or imaging features.
    A high degree of agreement was noticed between the two criteria sets. The supportive and imaging features played important role in the diagnosis of MSA and affected the diagnostic level in the current criteria.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by a combination of autonomic failure plus cerebellar syndrome and/or parkinsonism. Dysphagia is a frequent and disabling symptom in MSA and its occurrence within 5 years of motor onset is an additional diagnostic feature. Dysphagia can lead to aspiration pneumonia, a recognized cause of death in MSA. Guidelines for diagnosis and management of dysphagia in MSA are lacking. An International Consensus Conference among experts with methodological support was convened in Bologna to reach consensus statements for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of dysphagia in MSA. Abnormalities of the oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing, esophageal dysfunction and aspiration occur in MSA and worsen as the disease progresses. According to the consensus, dysphagia should be investigated through available screening questionnaires and clinical and instrumental assessment (videofluoroscopic study or fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and manometry) at the time of MSA diagnosis and periodically thereafter. There is evidence that dysphagia is associated with poor survival in MSA, however effective treatments for dysphagia are lacking. Compensatory strategies like diet modification, swallowing maneuvers and head postures should be applied and botulinum toxin injection may be effective in specific conditions. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy may be performed when there is a severe risk of malnutrition and pulmonary complications, but its impact on survival is undetermined. Several research gaps and unmet needs for research involving diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment were identified.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by a combination of autonomic failure, cerebellar ataxia, and parkinsonism. Laryngeal stridor is an additional feature for MSA diagnosis, showing a high diagnostic positive predictive value, and its early occurrence might contribute to shorten survival. A consensus definition of stridor in MSA is lacking, and disagreement persists about its diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. An International Consensus Conference among experts with methodological support was convened in Bologna in 2017 to define stridor in MSA and to reach consensus statements for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Stridor was defined as a strained, high-pitched, harsh respiratory sound, mainly inspiratory, occurring only during sleep or during both sleep and wakefulness, and caused by laryngeal dysfunction leading to narrowing of the rima glottidis. According to the consensus, stridor may be recognized clinically by the physician if present at the time of examination, with the help of a witness, or by listening to an audio recording. Laryngoscopy is suggested to exclude mechanical lesions or functional vocal cord abnormalities related to different neurologic conditions. If the suspicion of stridor needs confirmation, drug-induced sleep endoscopy or video polysomnography may be useful. The impact of stridor on survival and quality of life remains uncertain. Continuous positive airway pressure and tracheostomy are both suggested as symptomatic treatment of stridor, but whether they improve survival is uncertain. Several research gaps emerged involving diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Unmet needs for research were identified.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: The ataxias are a challenging group of neurological diseases due the aetiological heterogeneity and the complexity of the genetic subtypes. This guideline focuses on the heredodegenerative ataxias. The aim is to provide a peer-reviewed evidence-based guideline for clinical neurologists and other specialist physicians responsible for the care of patients with ataxia.
    METHODS: This guideline is based on systematic evaluations of the relevant literature and on three consensus meetings of the task force.
    METHODS: If acquired causes are ruled out, and if the disease course is rather slowly progressive, a (heredo)degenerative disease is likely. A positive family history gives much guidance. In the case of a dominant family history, first line genetic screening is recommended for spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 17 (level B), and in Asian patients also for dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA). In the case of recessive disease, a stepwise diagnostic work-up is recommended, including both biochemical markers and targeted genetic testing, particularly aimed at Friedreich\'s ataxia, ataxia telangiectasia, ataxia due to vitamin E deficiency, polymerase gamma gene (POLG gene, various mutations), autosomal recessive spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS) and ataxia with oculomotor apraxia (AOA) types 1 and 2. If family history is negative, we still advise to screen for the more common dominant and recessive ataxias. In addition, if onset is below 45 years we recommend the full work-up for recessive ataxias; if onset is above 45 years we recommend to screen for fragile X mental retardation 1 FMR1 premutations (good practice points). In sporadic cases with an onset after 30 years, a diagnosis of multiple system atrophy should be considered (good practice point). In particular the genetic work-up will change over the upcoming years due to the diagnostic utility of new techniques such as gene panel diagnostics based on next generation sequencing for routine work-up, or even whole exome and genome sequencing for selected cases.
    METHODS: Some of the rare recessive ataxias are treatable, but for most of the heredodegenerative ataxias treatment is purely symptomatic. Idebenone is not effective in Friedreich\'s ataxia (level A). Riluzole (level B) and amantadine (level C) might provide symptomatic relief, irrespective of exact etiology. Also, varenicline for SCA3 patients (level B) can be considered. There is level Class II evidence to recommend physiotherapy, and Class III data to support occupational therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a progressive, neurodegenerative disorder. Among its range of multisystem dysfunctions, manifestation of highly unstable blood pressure (BP) is often a primary clinical concern for practitioners and patients. The ability to manage BP instability has important implications ranging from patient comfort, safety, and choice of treatments to the incidental demands placed on a strained health care system. Many conditions require that patients monitor their BP, yet no guidelines are available for patients with MSA who have similar needs. Utilization of a self-care protocol could assist in planning more effective care regimens. Additionally, benefits to the patient and the health care system may also result from using evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to make patient care decisions. This paper describes the process of developing CPGs for patient self-management of BP instability secondary to MSA. It was guided by theoretical and practical frameworks such as those developed by the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO). Recommendations include the adoption of these CPGs for the care of patients coping with orthostatic hypotension secondary to MSA, Parkinson\'s disease, and other neurological conditions. The paper concludes with additional recommendations for research, health policy, and clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Parkinsonian-syndrome, clinically based on the combination of cardinal symptoms, could be the clinical manifestation of different, neuropathological defined entities. Because of the different prognostic, therapeutical and scientific implications a reliable differential diagnostic of the entities in early course of disease is desirable. For this purpose standardized clinical diagnostic criteria with sufficient validation against the gold standard of the neuropathological diagnostic are important. In this article, the clinical diagnostic criteria of atypical Parkinsonian-syndrome and their validity were discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The revised (new) consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for multiple system atrophy (MSA) were published in 2008. To validate these criteria, we utilized the same cohort that we reported previously, which included 59 patients with a clinical diagnosis of MSA that was confirmed neuropathologically in 51 of them at the Queen Square Brain Bank for Neurological Disorders. At the first clinic visit, sensitivity with new consensus possible category was higher, and PPV marginally higher, than for clinical diagnosis and old consensus possible category. New consensus probable category showed marginally higher sensitivity than, and the same PPV as, old consensus probable category. At the last clinic visit, new consensus possible category had exactly the same sensitivity and only marginally higher PPV compared with old consensus possible category. New consensus probable category showed the same sensitivity and PPV as old consensus probable category. Our data indicate that in this case material the new consensus criteria for possible MSA could improve diagnostic accuracy at first neurological evaluation compared with the old consensus criteria. Prospective clinicopathological validation studies of the new consensus criteria, particularly incorporating in vivo structural and functional imaging results, are required to extend the current findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Consensus Development Conference
    BACKGROUND: A consensus conference on multiple system atrophy (MSA) in 1998 established criteria for diagnosis that have been accepted widely. Since then, clinical, laboratory, neuropathologic, and imaging studies have advanced the field, requiring a fresh evaluation of diagnostic criteria. We held a second consensus conference in 2007 and present the results here.
    METHODS: Experts in the clinical, neuropathologic, and imaging aspects of MSA were invited to participate in a 2-day consensus conference. Participants were divided into five groups, consisting of specialists in the parkinsonian, cerebellar, autonomic, neuropathologic, and imaging aspects of the disorder. Each group independently wrote diagnostic criteria for its area of expertise in advance of the meeting. These criteria were discussed and reconciled during the meeting using consensus methodology.
    RESULTS: The new criteria retain the diagnostic categories of MSA with predominant parkinsonism and MSA with predominant cerebellar ataxia to designate the predominant motor features and also retain the designations of definite, probable, and possible MSA. Definite MSA requires neuropathologic demonstration of CNS alpha-synuclein-positive glial cytoplasmic inclusions with neurodegenerative changes in striatonigral or olivopontocerebellar structures. Probable MSA requires a sporadic, progressive adult-onset disorder including rigorously defined autonomic failure and poorly levodopa-responsive parkinsonism or cerebellar ataxia. Possible MSA requires a sporadic, progressive adult-onset disease including parkinsonism or cerebellar ataxia and at least one feature suggesting autonomic dysfunction plus one other feature that may be a clinical or a neuroimaging abnormality.
    CONCLUSIONS: These new criteria have simplified the previous criteria, have incorporated current knowledge, and are expected to enhance future assessments of the disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号