Metabolic tumor volume

代谢性肿瘤体积
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)的治疗中,多种治疗选择是可用的。改善结果预测对于优化治疗至关重要。代谢活跃肿瘤体积(MATV)已被证明是NHL的预后因素。通常使用基于标准化摄取值(SUV)的半自动阈值方法检索,从18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(18F-FDGPET)图像计算。然而,目前尚无NHL的共识方法。这项研究的目的是回顾有关所使用的不同分割方法的文献,并使用内部创建的软件工具评估选定的方法。一个软件工具,开发了MUltipleSUV阈值(MUST)分割器,通过在PET图像上放置种子点来识别肿瘤位置,其次是随后的地区增长。在文献综述的基础上,选择了9种SUV阈值方法并提取了MATV。在68例NHL患者的队列中使用了MUST节段。用配对t检验评估MATV的差异,以及相关性和分布数字。在NHL患者中观察到基于不同分割方法的MATV之间的高变异性和显着差异(p<0.05)。MATV的中位数范围为35至211cc。根据文献没有确定MATV的共识。使用MUST分割器和9种选定的SUV阈值方法,我们证明了MATV的巨大和显着的变化。确定NHL患者的最佳分割方法对于进一步改善毒性预测至关重要,回应,和治疗结果,这可以由MUST-Segmenter促进。
    In the treatment of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), multiple therapeutic options are available. Improving outcome predictions are essential to optimize treatment. The metabolic active tumor volume (MATV) has shown to be a prognostic factor in NHL. It is usually retrieved using semi-automated thresholding methods based on standardized uptake values (SUV), calculated from 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG PET) images. However, there is currently no consensus method for NHL. The aim of this study was to review literature on different segmentation methods used, and to evaluate selected methods by using an in house created software tool. A software tool, MUltiple SUV Threshold (MUST)-segmenter was developed where tumor locations are identified by placing seed-points on the PET images, followed by subsequent region growing. Based on a literature review, 9 SUV thresholding methods were selected and MATVs were extracted. The MUST-segmenter was utilized in a cohort of 68 patients with NHL. Differences in MATVs were assessed with paired t-tests, and correlations and distributions figures. High variability and significant differences between the MATVs based on different segmentation methods (p < 0.05) were observed in the NHL patients. Median MATVs ranged from 35 to 211 cc. No consensus for determining MATV is available based on the literature. Using the MUST-segmenter with 9 selected SUV thresholding methods, we demonstrated a large and significant variation in MATVs. Identifying the most optimal segmentation method for patients with NHL is essential to further improve predictions of toxicity, response, and treatment outcomes, which can be facilitated by the MUST-segmenter.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    本研究旨在探讨18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(18F-FDGPET/CT)在预测晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)早期免疫治疗反应中的价值。
    全面搜索PubMed,WebofScience,Embase和Cochrane文库用于检查18F-FDGPET/CT在预测NSCLC患者ICIs早期免疫治疗反应中的预后价值。评估的主要结果是总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。使用STATA14.0软件提取和分析来自每个研究的详细数据。
    本系统综述包括13篇符合条件的文章。与基线18F-FDGPET/CT成像相比,最大和平均标准化摄取值SUVmax的汇总风险比(HR),Suvmean,OS的MTV和TLG为0.88(95%CI:0.69-1.12),0.79(95%CI:0.50-1.27),2.10(95%CI:1.57-2.82)和1.58(95%CI:1.03-2.44),分别。SUVmax的合并HR,Suvmean,PFS的MTV和TLG为1.06(95%CI:0.68-1.65),0.66(95%CI:0.48-0.90),1.50(95%CI:1.26-1.79),1.27(95%CI:0.92-1.77),分别。亚组分析显示,一线组(HR:1.97,95%CI:1.39-2.79)和未定义线组(HR:2.11,95%CI:1.61-2.77)中,高MTV组的OS均短于低MTV组。高MTV组一线组PFS较短(HR:1.85,95%CI:1.28-2.68),而低TLG组的OS在未定义组中更长(HR:1.37,95%CI:1.00-1.86)。其他亚组分析差异无统计学意义。基线MTV和TLG可能具有预测价值,应在临床试验中进行前瞻性研究。基线SUVmax和SUVmean可能不是ICIs治疗的晚期或转移性NSCLC患者的适当预后指标。
    https://www。crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?RecordID=323906,标识符CRD4202223906。
    This study aimed to investigate the value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in predicting early immunotherapy response of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
    A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of science, Embase and the Cochrane library was performed to examine the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in predicting early immunotherapy response of ICIs in patients with NSCLC. The main outcomes for evaluation were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Detailed data from each study were extracted and analyzed using STATA 14.0 software.
    13 eligible articles were included in this systematic review. Compared to baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging, the pooled hazard ratios (HR) of maximum and mean standardized uptake values SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV and TLG for OS were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.69-1.12), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.50-1.27), 2.10 (95% CI: 1.57-2.82) and 1.58 (95% CI: 1.03-2.44), respectively. The pooled HR of SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV and TLG for PFS were 1.06 (95% CI: 0.68-1.65), 0.66 (95% CI: 0.48-0.90), 1.50 (95% CI: 1.26-1.79), 1.27 (95% CI: 0.92-1.77), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that high MTV group had shorter OS than low MTV group in both first line group (HR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.39-2.79) and undefined line group (HR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.61-2.77). High MTV group also showed a shorter PFS in first line group (HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.28-2.68), and low TLG group had a longer OS in undefined group (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.00-1.86). No significant differences were in other subgroup analysis.
    Baseline MTV and TLG may have predictive value and should be prospectively studied in clinical trials. Baseline SUVmax and SUVmean may not be appropriate prognostic markers in advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients treated with ICIs.
    https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=323906, identifier CRD42022323906.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:为了评估SUV的作用,MTV,TLG和其他FDGPET度量数据预测新诊断BC患者的预后。
    方法:通过使用三个不同的数据库进行了系统评价:PubMed,WebofScience和EMBASE,在2011年1月至2021年5月期间。关于在BC患者中使用FDGPET的研究,关于公制PET数据的实用性和存活率进行了检索。以下关键字用于不同的组合:“乳腺癌”,\"18F-FDG\",\"FDG\",\"PET\",\"PET/CT\",\"FDGPET\",“体积参数”,“代谢性肿瘤体积”,\"MTV\",“总病变糖酵解”,\"TLG\",“预后”,\"预后\"。没有应用限制。通过使用特定标准来评估所选论文的质量。
    结果:共检索到123篇文章,但只选择了14项研究。在选定的论文中,总的来说,患者人数为1850人。总生存期(OS)是三项研究的主要结果,而OS和无病生存期(DFS)在大多数论文的其余部分都被考虑。对BC患者进行PET/CT检查,手术前或新辅助化疗6项研究和转移性BC8项。在多变量分析中,不同的PET指标,例如SUVmax,MTV和TLG与复发或OS相关。然而,提案截止的巨大异质性,能够区分预后差和预后好,找到了。
    结论:PET指标有助于局部晚期或转移性BC患者的预后分层。然而,在这种情况下,目前尚无这些变量的具体截止值.
    The study aims to assess the role of SUVs, MTV, TLG, and other FDG PET metric data in predicting the prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed BC.
    A systematic review was conducted by using three different databases: Pub- Med, Web of Science, and EMBASE, in the period between January 2011 and May 2021. Studies on the use of FDG PET in BC patients concerning the utility of metric PET data and survival were retrieved. The following keywords were used in diverse combinations: \"breast cancer\", \"18F-FDG\", \"FDG\", \"PET\", \"PET/CT\", \"FDG PET\", \"volumetric parameters\", \"metabolic tumor volume\", \"MTV\", \"total lesion glycolysis\", \"TLG\", \"prognosis\", \"prognostic\". No limits were applied. The quality of selected papers was assessed by using specific criteria.
    Totally 123 articles were retrieved, but only 14 studies were selected. In the selected papers, overall, the number of patients was 1850. Overall survival (OS) was the main outcome in three studies, while both OS and disease-free survival (DFS) were considered in the remainder of most papers. PET/CT was performed in patients with BC before surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 6 studies and in metastatic BC in 8. At multivariable analyses, diverse PET metrics, such as SUVmax, MTV, and TLG, were correlated to recurrence or OS. However, a large heterogeneity for the proposal cut-off, able to discriminate between poor and good prognosis, was found.
    PET metrics are helpful for the prognosis stratification in patients with locally advanced or metastatic BC. However, no specific cut-off values for these variables are now available in this setting of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Many studies have suggested a prognostic value of one or several positron emission tomography (PET) parameters in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, studies are often small, and there is a considerable interstudy disagreement about which PET parameters have a prognostic value. The objective of this study was to perform a review and meta-analysis to identify the most promising PET parameter for prognostication. PubMed®, Cochrane, and Embase® were searched for papers addressing the prognostic value of any PET parameter at any treatment phase with any endpoint in patients with SCLC. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated by a random effects model for the prognostic value of the baseline maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV). The qualitative analysis included 38 studies, of these, 19 studies were included in the meta-analyses. The pooled results showed that high baseline MTV was prognostic for overall survival (OS) (HR: 2.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.00-4.01) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 3.11 (95% CI: 1.99-4.90)). The prognostic value of SUVmax was less pronounced (OS: HR: 1.50 (95% CI: 1.17-1.91); PFS: HR: 1.24 (95% CI: 0.94-1.63)). Baseline MTV is a strong prognosticator for OS and PFS in patients with SCLC. MTV has a prognostic value superior to those of other PET parameters, but whether MTV is superior to other prognosticators of tumor burden needs further investigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of volume-based 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters regarding the prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) in patients with uterine cervical cancer.
    The PubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched until January 19, 2018. We included studies that evaluated pretreatment MTV or TLG as a prognostic factor in uterine cervical cancer with event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) as the endpoints. Effect sizes of the prognostic value of MTV and TLG were measured in terms of hazard ratio (HR) and were meta-analytically pooled. Multiple subgroup analyses stratified to clinicopathologic and PET/CT variables were performed to explore heterogeneity.
    Twelve studies including 660 patients were included. Prognoses were worse in patients with high MTV and TLG, with pooled HRs of 5.89 (95% CI, 3.85-9.01; p < 0.00001) and 5.82 (95% CI, 3.62-9.35; p < 0.00001), respectively, for EFS and 6.62 (95% CI, 3.44-12.73; p < 0.00001) and 7.75 (95% CI, 3.48-17.27; p < 0.00001), respectively, for OS. At multiple subgroups analyses, the prognostic values of MTV and TLG for EFS were consistently significant, with pooled HRs of 5.08-7.30 and 4.80-15.83, respectively.
    Volume-based FDG PET/CT parameters were significant prognostic factors in patients with uterine cervical cancer. In spite of clinical and methodologic differences across the studies, patients with high MTV or TLG had a higher risk of adverse events or death.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET-derived volume-based parameters regarding metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) in patients with ovarian cancer.
    METHODS: Pubmed and EMBASE databases were searched up to February 12, 2018 for studies which evaluated MTV or TLG as a prognostic factor in ovarian cancer with progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as the endpoints. Hazard ratios (HRs) were meta-analytically pooled using the random-effects model. Multiple subgroup analyses based on clinicopathological and PET variables were performed.
    RESULTS: Eight studies with 473 patients were included. The pooled HRs of MTV and TLG for PFS were 2.50 (95% CI 1.79-3.48; p < 0.00001) and 2.42 (95% CI 1.61-3.65; p < 0.0001), respectively. Regarding OS, the pooled HRs of MTV and TLG were 8.06 (95% CI 4.32-15.05; p < 0.00001) and 7.23 (95% CI 3.38-15.50; p < 0.00001), respectively. Multiple subgroup analyses consistently showed that MTV and TLG were significant prognostic factors for PFS with pooled HRs ranging from 2.35 to 2.58 and from 1.73 to 3.35, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: MTV and TLG from 18F-FDG PET were significant prognostic factors in patients with ovarian cancer. Despite the clinical heterogeneity and difference in methodology between the studies, patients with a high MTV or TLG have a higher risk of disease progression or death.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描CT(18F-FDGPET/CT)参数在鼻咽癌患者中的预后作用仍存在争议。我们试图进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以探讨最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)的预后价值,代谢肿瘤体积(MTV)和总病变糖酵解(TLG)对鼻咽癌患者无事件生存期(EFS)和总生存期(OS)的影响。
    结果:本研究包括15项研究,包括1,938名患者。对于SUVmax,EFS的综合风险比(HR)为2.63(95CI1.71-4.05),MTV为2.55(95CI1.49-4.35),TLG为3.32(95CI1.23-8.95)。对于SUVmax,OS的合并HR为2.07(95CI1.54-2.79),用于MTV的3.86(95CI1.85-8.06),TLG为2.60(95CI1.55-4.34)。SUVmax的预后作用,MTV和TLG在亚组分析中保持相似。
    方法:进行了系统的文献检索,以确定18F-FDGPET/CT与鼻咽癌患者临床生存结局相关的研究。根据试验之间的异质性,通过使用固定或随机效应模型来估计EFS和OS的汇总HR。
    结论:本荟萃分析证实,SUVmax的高值,MTV和TLG预测鼻咽癌患者发生不良事件或死亡的风险较高。尽管鼻咽癌患者的临床异质性以及这些研究之间采用的各种方法。
    BACKGROUND: The prognostic role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography CT (18F-FDG PET/CT) parameters is still controversial in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. We sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the prognostic value of maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.
    RESULTS: Fifteen studies comprising 1,938 patients were included in this study. The combined hazard ratios (HRs) for EFS were 2.63 (95%CI 1.71-4.05) for SUVmax, 2.55 (95%CI 1.49-4.35) for MTV, and 3.32 (95%CI 1.23-8.95) for TLG. The pooled HRs for OS were 2.07 (95%CI 1.54-2.79) for SUVmax, 3.86 (95%CI 1.85-8.06) for MTV, and 2.60 (95%CI 1.55-4.34) for TLG. The prognostic role of SUVmax, MTV and TLG remained similar in the sub-group analyses.
    METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies which associated 18F-FDG PET/CT to clinical survival outcomes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. The summarized HRs for EFS and OS were estimated by using fixed- or random-effect models according to heterogeneity between trials.
    CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis confirms that high values of SUVmax, MTV and TLG predicted a higher risk of adverse events or death in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, despite clinically heterogeneous nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and the various methods adopted between these studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号