Abstract：
The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of volume-based 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters regarding the prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) in patients with uterine cervical cancer.
The PubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched until January 19, 2018. We included studies that evaluated pretreatment MTV or TLG as a prognostic factor in uterine cervical cancer with event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) as the endpoints. Effect sizes of the prognostic value of MTV and TLG were measured in terms of hazard ratio (HR) and were meta-analytically pooled. Multiple subgroup analyses stratified to clinicopathologic and PET/CT variables were performed to explore heterogeneity.
Twelve studies including 660 patients were included. Prognoses were worse in patients with high MTV and TLG, with pooled HRs of 5.89 (95% CI, 3.85-9.01; p < 0.00001) and 5.82 (95% CI, 3.62-9.35; p < 0.00001), respectively, for EFS and 6.62 (95% CI, 3.44-12.73; p < 0.00001) and 7.75 (95% CI, 3.48-17.27; p < 0.00001), respectively, for OS. At multiple subgroups analyses, the prognostic values of MTV and TLG for EFS were consistently significant, with pooled HRs of 5.08-7.30 and 4.80-15.83, respectively.
Volume-based FDG PET/CT parameters were significant prognostic factors in patients with uterine cervical cancer. In spite of clinical and methodologic differences across the studies, patients with high MTV or TLG had a higher risk of adverse events or death.
The PubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched until January 19, 2018. We included studies that evaluated pretreatment MTV or TLG as a prognostic factor in uterine cervical cancer with event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) as the endpoints. Effect sizes of the prognostic value of MTV and TLG were measured in terms of hazard ratio (HR) and were meta-analytically pooled. Multiple subgroup analyses stratified to clinicopathologic and PET/CT variables were performed to explore heterogeneity.
Twelve studies including 660 patients were included. Prognoses were worse in patients with high MTV and TLG, with pooled HRs of 5.89 (95% CI, 3.85-9.01; p < 0.00001) and 5.82 (95% CI, 3.62-9.35; p < 0.00001), respectively, for EFS and 6.62 (95% CI, 3.44-12.73; p < 0.00001) and 7.75 (95% CI, 3.48-17.27; p < 0.00001), respectively, for OS. At multiple subgroups analyses, the prognostic values of MTV and TLG for EFS were consistently significant, with pooled HRs of 5.08-7.30 and 4.80-15.83, respectively.
Volume-based FDG PET/CT parameters were significant prognostic factors in patients with uterine cervical cancer. In spite of clinical and methodologic differences across the studies, patients with high MTV or TLG had a higher risk of adverse events or death.
摘要：
暂无翻译
