Medical Staff, Hospital

医务人员,医院
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在农村和偏远地区工作的印度尼西亚医生不仅必须具备一般能力,而且必须具备在不影响质量的情况下提供保健服务所需的属性和技能。这项研究旨在就属性和能力达成共识,这些属性和能力对于在印度尼西亚的农村和偏远实践中作为早期职业医生有效工作至关重要。通过参考在农村和偏远印度尼西亚工作的27名同意的医生进行了两轮Delphi研究。将涵盖9个属性和34个能力的43个项目发送给这些医生,根据其对有效的农村和偏远实践的重要性,以1至5的Likert量表进行评级。9项属性和29项能力进入第二轮。所有9个属性和29个能力都被确定为初级医师在实践中有效的能力所必需或重要。基本属性包括与优先考虑农村社区相关的专业素质。基本能力包括医疗技能,职业行为,跨专业技能,健康促进和与农村社区的联系。因此,就这些基本和重要的属性和能力达成的共识可以为初级农村和偏远医生的本科和研究生培训提供课程开发。
    Indonesian physicians working in rural and remote areas must be equipped not only with generic competencies but also with the attributes and skills necessary to provide health care services without compromising quality. This study sought to reach a consensus on the attributes and competencies that are viewed as essential and important for working effectively as an early career doctor in rural and remote practice in Indonesia. A two-round Delphi study was conducted by reference to 27 consenting physicians working in rural and remote Indonesia. Forty-three items covering 9 attributes and 34 competencies were sent to these physicians to be rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 in terms of their importance for effective rural and remote practice. Nine attributes and 29 competencies progressed to Round 2. All nine attributes and 29 competencies were identified as essential or important for junior physicians\' ability to be effective in their practice. The essential attributes included professional quality related to prioritising the rural community. The essential competencies included medical skills, professional behaviour, interprofessional skills, health promotion and connection to the rural community. The consensus thus reached on these essential and important attributes and competencies can inform curriculum development for the undergraduate and postgraduate training of junior rural and remote physicians.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    没有系统的,在住院患者中存在普遍接受的诊断营养不良的方法,这可能会导致诊断不足,治疗不足,和较差的患者结果。为了解决这个问题,营养与饮食学会正在开展一项队列研究,目的是:评估营养与饮食学会/美国肠外和肠内营养学会在医院环境中诊断成人和儿科营养不良的指标的预测有效性;评估成人和儿科营养不良诊断指标的评估者间可靠性;并量化改善患者预后所需的注册营养师护理水平.多达60名成人和60名儿科医院将收集数据,以评估注册营养师的营养师护理水平,以及患者病史和营养不良筛查工具(成人)或STRONGkids(儿科)结果。将随机选择600名成人和600名儿科患者的子集(〜1:1筛查为营养不良的高风险或低风险),用于成人和儿科营养不良的诊断指标和营养重点体检数据收集;该组中的100名成人和100名儿科患者也将进行生物电阻抗分析测量。额外的营养护理和医疗结果(例如,死亡率和住院时间)将在初次营养接触后的3个月内收集。多级线性,logistic,Poisson,或Cox回归模型将用于评估成人和儿童营养不良诊断的有效性指标,并根据每个医疗结果评估注册营养师的人员配备水平。验证结果将使美国临床医生能够标准化他们诊断住院患者营养不良的方式,和人员配备数据将支持倡导可用的注册营养师营养师提供营养不良治疗,以改善患者结局。
    No systematic, universally accepted method of diagnosing malnutrition in hospitalized patients exists, which may contribute to underdiagnosis, undertreatment, and poorer patient outcomes. To address this issue, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is conducting a cohort study to: assess the predictive validity of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition indicators for the diagnosis of adult and pediatric malnutrition in hospital settings; assess the interrater reliability of the indicators for the diagnosis of adult and pediatric malnutrition; and quantify the level of registered dietitian nutritionist care needed to improve patient outcomes. Up to 60 adult and 60 pediatric hospital sites will collect data to estimate level of registered dietitian nutritionist care, along with patient medical history and Malnutrition Screening Tool (adult) or STRONGkids (pediatric) results. A subset of 600 adult and 600 pediatric patients (∼1:1 screened as high- or low-risk for malnutrition) will be randomly selected for the indicators for the diagnosis of adult and pediatric malnutrition and Nutrition Focused Physical Exam data collection; 100 adult and 100 pediatric patients in this group will also undergo a bioelectrical impedance analysis measurement. Additional nutrition care and medical outcomes (eg, mortality and length of stay) will be collected for a 3-month period after the initial nutrition encounter. Multilevel linear, logistic, Poisson, or Cox regression models will be used to assess indicators for the diagnosis of adult and pediatric malnutrition validity and registered dietitian nutritionist staffing levels as appropriate for each medical outcome. Validation results will allow US clinicians to standardize the way they diagnose malnutrition in hospitalized patients, and the staffing data will support advocacy for available registered dietitian nutritionist-delivered malnutrition treatment to improve patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们探讨了在高死亡率环境中,实践偏离指南建议的高死亡率环境中,谁实际上为毕业的临床医生提供了大多数入院护理。
    我们使用了2015年11月至2018年11月来自肯尼亚13家县级医院的大量观察数据集,其中患者与入院的临床医生相关。我们在5分量表(0-4)上创建儿科入院护理质量(cPAQC)评分的累积正确性后,探索了指南依从性,其中分数代表正确,在提供完全遵循包括入院评估在内的指南的护理方面的连续进展,诊断和治疗。在指南依从性下降最多的时候,我们将cPAQC评分二分,并使用多水平逻辑回归模型来探讨临床医生和患者水平因素是否会影响依从性。
    有1489名临床医生在3年内与53003名患者相关。患者很少由完全合格的临床医生收治,主要由预先注册的医务人员实习生(MOI,46%)和文凭水平的临床官员实习生(COI,41%),每个研究医院提供护理的中位数为28MOI(范围11-68)和52COI(范围5-160)。cPAQC评分表明,在≤12%的疟疾儿童中发现了完美的指南依从性,肺炎或腹泻伴脱水。与COI相比,MOI对指南的依从性更高(校正OR1.19(95%CI1.07至1.34)),但多症与较低的指南依从性显着相关。
    在肯尼亚,在高死亡率环境中提供体验式培训的医院中,超过85%的入院是由预先注册的临床医生进行的。临床评估是良好的,但根据指南建议对疾病的严重程度进行分类是一个挑战。接受6年培训的MOI比接受3年培训的COI更好,在他们3个月的儿科轮换期间,表现似乎没有改善。
    We explored who actually provides most admission care in hospitals offering supervised experiential training to graduating clinicians in a high mortality setting where practices deviate from guideline recommendations.
    We used a large observational data set from 13 Kenyan county hospitals from November 2015 through November 2018 where patients were linked to admitting clinicians. We explored guideline adherence after creating a cumulative correctness of Paediatric Admission Quality of Care (cPAQC) score on a 5-point scale (0-4) in which points represent correct, sequential progress in providing care perfectly adherent to guidelines comprising admission assessment, diagnosis and treatment. At the point where guideline adherence declined the most we dichotomised the cPAQC score and used multilevel logistic regression models to explore whether clinician and patient-level factors influence adherence.
    There were 1489 clinicians who could be linked to 53 003 patients over a period of 3 years. Patients were rarely admitted by fully qualified clinicians and predominantly by preregistration medical officer interns (MOI, 46%) and diploma level clinical officer interns (COI, 41%) with a median of 28 MOI (range 11-68) and 52 COI (range 5-160) offering care per study hospital. The cPAQC scores suggest that perfect guideline adherence is found in ≤12% of children with malaria, pneumonia or diarrhoea with dehydration. MOIs were more adherent to guidelines than COI (adjusted OR 1.19 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.34)) but multimorbidity was significantly associated with lower guideline adherence.
    Over 85% of admissions to hospitals in high mortality settings that offer experiential training in Kenya are conducted by preregistration clinicians. Clinical assessment is good but classifying severity of illness in accordance with guideline recommendations is a challenge. Adherence by MOI with 6 years\' training is better than COI with 3 years\' training, performance does not seem to improve during their 3 months of paediatric rotations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is an increasingly used method of respiratory support. The use of NIV is expanding over the time and if properly applied, it can save patients\' lives and improve long-term prognosis. However, both knowledge and skills of its proper use as life support are paramount. This systematic review aimed to assess the importance of NIV education and training. Literature search was conducted (MEDLINE: 1990 to June, 2018) to identify randomized controlled studies and systematic reviews with the results analyzed by a team of experts across the world through e-mail based communications. Clinical trials examining the impact of education and training in NIV as the primary objective was not found. A few studies with indirect evidence, a simulation-based training study, and narrative reviews were identified. Currently organized training in NIV is implemented only in a few developed countries. Due to a lack of high-grade experimental evidence, an international consensus on NIV education and training based on opinions from 64 experts across the twenty-one different countries of the world was formulated. Education and training have the potential to increase knowledge and skills of the clinical staff who deliver medical care using NIV. There is a genuine need to develop structured, organized NIV education and training programs, especially for the developing countries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    It is important for safe practice in radiology that junior doctors are aware of the guidelines and legislation surrounding ionising radiation; however, it has been demonstrated over many years that knowledge in these areas is poor with potential impacts on patient safety. As the reliance of the National Health Service (NHS) on radiological imaging increases, it is vital that lasting intervention is implemented to prevent harm. This commentary highlights key issues in this area with results from a recent audit and suggests potential solutions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:根据SGBV(德国社会保障法第五卷)第136a(2)条,德国立法者指示联邦联合委员会(G-BA)为住院精神病和心身治疗所需的工作人员规定具有约束力的最低标准。这促使专家协会/组织就未来的人员配备组织制定自己的概念性方法。
    方法:组织定期专家研讨会,其结果由专家系统地记录和验证。
    结果:该概念的基本要素是:计算的起点是在机构中接受治疗的所有患者的需求。治疗的需要有三个方面:(a)精神病心理治疗/心身心理治疗/儿科和青少年精神病-心理治疗,(b)躯体和(c)心理社会需要。该平台开发的模型区分了与单个患者的治疗直接相关的工作人员需求,由待遇设置引起的人员需求以及机构一级产生的此类人员需求。最低工作人员要求被理解为工作人员结构,即,其中,需要保证多专业,为现有指南或专家共识规定的所有患者提供由医生主导的治疗和所需的医疗服务,并确保对患者的保护,其他患者和在设施中工作的员工。
    结论:该模型考虑了循证指南和修改后的医疗实践中的医学进步,包括针对患者自决的社会政治标准。
    OBJECTIVE: According to § 136a (2) SGB V (volume V of the German Social Security Code) the German legislator instructed the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) to specify binding minimum standards for the staff needed for the treatment in inpatient psychiatric and psychosomatic facilities. This induced the expert associations/organizations to develop their own conceptional approach as to the future organization of staffing.
    METHODS: Organization of regular expert workshops, the results of which were systematically documented and validated by the experts.
    RESULTS: The essential elements of the concept are: the starting points for the calculation are the needs of all patients treated in the institution. The need for treatment has three dimensions: (a) psychiatric psychotherapeutic/psychosomatic psychotherapeutic/pediatric and adolescent psychiatric-psychotherapeutic, (b) somatic and (c) psychosocial needs. The model developed by the platform distinguishes between staff requirements being directly related to the treatment of the individual patient, staff requirements caused by the treatment setting and such staff requirements arising at an institutional level. Minimum staff requirement is understood as the staff structure which is, among others, needed to guarantee the multiprofessional, physician-led treatment and the required medical care services for all patients specified by the existing guidelines or an expert consensus as well as to ensure the protection of the patient, fellow patients and the employees working in the facility against hazards.
    CONCLUSIONS: This model considers the medical progress within the meaning of the evidence-based guidelines and the modified healthcare practice including sociopolitical standards aimed at the patients\' self-determination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The Hospital Privileges Practice Guideline Writing Group of the Society for Vascular Surgery is making the following five recommendations concerning guidelines for hospital privileges for vascular surgery and endovascular therapy. Advanced endovascular procedures are currently entrenched in the everyday practice of specialized vascular interventionalists, including vascular surgeons, but open vascular surgery remains uniquely essential to the specialty. First, we endorse the Residency Review Committee for Surgery recommendations regarding open and endovascular cases during vascular residency and fellowship training. Second, applicants for new hospital privileges wishing to perform vascular surgery should have completed an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited vascular surgery residency or fellowship or American Osteopathic Association-accredited training program before 2020 and should obtain American Board of Surgery certification in vascular surgery or American Osteopathic Association certification within 7 years of completion of their training. Third, we recommend that applicants for renewal of hospital privileges in vascular surgery include physicians who are board certified in vascular surgery, general surgery, or cardiothoracic surgery. These physicians with an established practice in vascular surgery should participate in Maintenance of Certification programs as established by the American Board of Surgery and maintain their respective board certification. Fourth, we provide recommendations concerning guidelines for endovascular procedures for vascular surgeons and other vascular interventionalists who are applying for new or renewed hospital privileges. All physicians performing open or endovascular procedures should track outcomes using nationally validated registries, ideally by the Vascular Quality Initiative. Fifth, we endorse the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission recommendations for noninvasive vascular laboratory interpretations and examinations to become a Registered Physician in Vascular Interpretation, which is included in the requirements for board eligibility in vascular surgery, but recommend that only physicians with demonstrated clinical experience in the diagnosis and management of vascular disease be allowed to interpret these studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Guidelines for venous thromboembolism treatment with curative anticoagulation in cancer patients are poorly respected. Yet, venous thromboembolism is the second leading cause of death in cancer patients, after cancer progression. The aim of this study was to re-evaluate the application of these guidelines after the implementation of educational measures for patients and caregivers, and also to assess the acceptability and tolerance of treatment by patients. On the one hand, a prospective observational study conducted in cancer patients with VTE allowed to assess the rate of compliance to guidelines. These phone calls with patients also provided information on their perception of their treatment. On the other hand, surveys were sent to healthcare professionals before and after educative actions took place (information meetings and information sheets distribution) in order to evaluate the evolution of their knowledge about guidelines. Among the 110 patients included in the study, 71.8% received treatment according to guidelines: choice of the anticoagulant (low-molecular-weight heparin or antivitamin K if contraindicated) and right period of treatment. Among the patients, 84.1% were willing to continue treatment beyond 6 months. Healthcare professionals\' knowledge about guidelines has increased significantly (from 20% to 42%) following the information meetings and information sheets distribution. These educative actions seem to have a positive impact on knowledge of the recommendations and their implementation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Compliance with maternity clinical practice guidelines developed by National Women\'s Health has been found to be low at audit.
    To explore the reasons for poor compliance with maternity guidelines by evaluating the quality of a sample of National Women\'s Health guidelines using a validated instrument and assessing local guideline users\' perceptions of and attitudes toward guidelines.
    Five independent reviewers evaluated the quality of 10 purposively selected guidelines for adherence to the Appraisal of Guidelines Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument standards. A self-administered questionnaire for staff was undertaken regarding views of and barriers to guideline use.
    None of the guidelines attained a score over 50% for the following domains: stakeholder involvement, rigour of development, applicability, editorial independence. The highest scoring domain was clarity of presentation (mean 69%). All guidelines scored the minimum possible for editorial independence. Survey respondents had positive attitudes toward guidelines, believed that their use could improve quality of care within the service, and felt that encouragement from senior staff members and peers would encourage their use. Accessibility was the most commonly cited of many barriers identified.
    The National Women\'s Health guidelines evaluated in this study cannot be considered to be high quality, and could be improved by reporting on methodology of the development process. Although poor guideline development may contribute to failure of the local maternity guidelines, it appears that accessibility is a major barrier to their use and implementation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: High quality clinical learning environments (CLE) are critical to postgraduate medical education (PGME). The understaffed and overcrowded environments in which many residents work present a significant challenge to learning. The purpose of this study was to develop a national expert group consensus amongst stakeholders in PGME to; (i) identify important barriers and facilitators of learning in CLEs and (ii) indicate priority areas for improvement. Our objective was to provide information to focus efforts to provide high quality CLEs.
    METHODS: Group Concept Mapping (GCM) is an integrated mixed methods approach to generating expert group consensus. A multi-disciplinary group of experts were invited to participate in the GCM process via an online platform. Multi-dimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis were used to analyse participant inputs in regard to barriers, facilitators and priorities.
    RESULTS: Participants identified facilitators and barriers in ten domains within clinical learning environments. Domains rated most important were those which related to residents\' connection to and engagement with more senior doctors. Organisation and conditions of work and Time to learn with senior doctors during patient care were rated as the most difficult areas in which to make improvements.
    CONCLUSIONS: High quality PGME requires that residents engage and connect with senior doctors during patient care, and that they are valued and supported both as learners and service providers. Academic medicine and health service managers must work together to protect these elements of CLEs, which not only shape learning, but impact quality of care and patient safety.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号