Long-term mortality

长期死亡率
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    低白蛋白血症与急性缺血性卒中(AIS)预后不良相关我们假设了非线性关系,并旨在使用来自Norfolk和NorwichStroke和TIARegister的前瞻性卒中数据系统地评估这种关联。纳入2003年12月至2016年12月收治的年龄≥40岁的连续AIS患者。结果:住院死亡率,放电不良,功能结局(改良Rankin评分3-6),延长住院时间(PLoS)>4天,和长期死亡率。限制性三次样条回归研究了白蛋白与结果的关系。我们更新了系统评价(PubMed,Scopus,和Embase数据库,2020年1月-2023年6月),并进行了荟萃分析。共纳入9979例患者;平均年龄(标准差)=78.3(11.2)岁;平均血清白蛋白36.69g/L(5.38)。与队列中位数相比,白蛋白<37g/L与长期死亡率(HRmax;95%CI=2.01;1.61-2.49)和住院死亡率(RRmax;95%CI=1.48;1.21-1.80)高2倍相关。白蛋白>44g/L与高达12%的长期死亡率相关(HRmax1.12;1.06-1.19)。9项研究符合我们的纳入标准,共有23,597名患者。低白蛋白与长期死亡率风险增加相关(两项研究;相对风险1.57(95%CI1.11-2.22;I2=81.28)),正常白蛋白低(RR1.10(95%CI1.01-1.20;I2=0.00))。强有力的证据表明,入院时白蛋白低或正常低的AIS患者的长期死亡率增加。
    Hypoalbuminemia associates with poor acute ischemic stroke (AIS) outcomes. We hypothesised a non-linear relationship and aimed to systematically assess this association using prospective stroke data from the Norfolk and Norwich Stroke and TIA Register. Consecutive AIS patients aged ≥40 years admitted December 2003-December 2016 were included. Outcomes: In-hospital mortality, poor discharge, functional outcome (modified Rankin score 3-6), prolonged length of stay (PLoS) > 4 days, and long-term mortality. Restricted cubic spline regressions investigated the albumin-outcome relationship. We updated a systematic review (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases, January 2020-June 2023) and undertook a meta-analysis. A total of 9979 patients were included; mean age (standard deviation) = 78.3 (11.2) years; mean serum albumin 36.69 g/L (5.38). Compared to the cohort median, albumin < 37 g/L associated with up to two-fold higher long-term mortality (HRmax; 95% CI = 2.01; 1.61-2.49) and in-hospital mortality (RRmax; 95% CI = 1.48; 1.21-1.80). Albumin > 44 g/L associated with up to 12% higher long-term mortality (HRmax1.12; 1.06-1.19). Nine studies met our inclusion criteria totalling 23,597 patients. Low albumin associated with increased risk of long-term mortality (two studies; relative risk 1.57 (95% CI 1.11-2.22; I2 = 81.28)), as did low-normal albumin (RR 1.10 (95% CI 1.01-1.20; I2 = 0.00)). Strong evidence indicates increased long-term mortality in AIS patients with low or low-normal albumin on admission.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:右心室功能障碍(RVD)在危重病中很常见。迄今为止,探索RVD后遗症的研究具有异质性的定义和诊断方法,有限的后续行动。此外,许多文献都是病理学特异性的,限制对一般严重不适患者的适用性。
    我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估经胸超声心动图(TTE)诊断的RVD对未选择的危重不适患者与无RVD患者长期死亡率的影响。对EMBASE的系统搜索,Medline和Cochrane从成立到2022年3月进行。包括使用TTE的所有RVD定义。病人是那些住进重症监护室或重症监护室的病人,不管疾病的进程。长期死亡率定义为入院后至少30天发生的全因死亡率。先验亚组分析包括RVD患者的疾病特异性和延迟死亡率(出院后/入院后第30天死亡)。使用Dersimionian和Laird逆方差方法进行了随机效应模型分析,以生成效应估计。
    结果:在5985项研究中,123人接受了全文审查,其中16人被纳入(n=3196)。1258例患者有RVD。确定了19个独特的RVD标准。与无RVD相比,有RVD的长期死亡率的比值比(OR)为2.92(95%CI1.92-4.54,I276.4%)。心脏和COVID19亚组的方向和范围相似。与孤立的左/双心室功能障碍相比,孤立的RVD显示延迟死亡的风险增加(OR2.01,95%CI1.05-3.86,I246.8%)。
    结论:RVD,不管是什么原因,与重症患者的长期死亡率增加有关。未来的研究应旨在了解发生这种情况的病理生理机制。RVD的常用超声心动图定义显示不同研究的显著异质性,这导致了该数据集中的不确定性。
    OBJECTIVE: Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) is common in the critically ill. To date studies exploring RVD sequelae have had heterogenous definitions and diagnostic methods, with limited follow-up. Additionally much literature has been pathology specific, limiting applicability to the general critically unwell patient.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of RVD diagnosed with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) on long-term mortality in unselected critically unwell patients compared to those without RVD. A systematic search of EMBASE, Medline and Cochrane was performed from inception to March 2022. All RVD definitions using TTE were included. Patients were those admitted to a critical or intensive care unit, irrespective of disease processes. Long-term mortality was defined as all-cause mortality occurring at least 30 days after hospital admission. A priori subgroup analyses included disease specific and delayed mortality (death after hospital discharge/after the 30th day from hospital admission) in patients with RVD. A random effects model analysis was performed with the Dersimionian and Laird inverse variance method to generate effect estimates.
    RESULTS: Of 5985 studies, 123 underwent full text review with 16 included (n = 3196). 1258 patients had RVD. 19 unique RVD criteria were identified. The odds ratio (OR) for long term mortality with RVD was 2.92 (95% CI 1.92-4.54, I2 76.4%) compared to no RVD. The direction and extent was similar for cardiac and COVID19 subgroups. Isolated RVD showed an increased risk of delayed mortality when compared to isolated left/biventricular dysfunction (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.05-3.86, I2 46.8%).
    CONCLUSIONS: RVD, irrespective of cause, is associated with increased long term mortality in the critically ill. Future studies should be aimed at understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms by which this occurs. Commonly used echocardiographic definitions of RVD show significant heterogeneity across studies, which contributes to uncertainty within this dataset.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在评估多学科治疗对接受根治性胃切除术的局部晚期胃癌(LAGC)患者的疗效。
    比较单独手术效果的随机对照试验(RCT),辅助化疗(CT),辅助放疗(RT),辅助放化疗(CRT),新辅助CT,新辅助RT,新辅助CRT,对LAGC的围手术期CT和腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)进行了搜索。总生存期(OS),无病生存率(DFS),复发和转移,长期死亡率,不良事件(≥3级),手术并发症和R0切除率作为Meta分析的结果指标。
    最终分析了45个RCT,共10077名参与者。辅助CT的OS(风险比[HR]=0.74,95%可信区间[CI]=0.66-0.82)和DFS(HR=0.67,95%CI=0.60-0.74)高于单独手术组。围手术期CT(比值比[OR]=2.56,95%CI=1.19-5.50)和辅助CT(OR=0.48,95%CI=0.27-0.86)均比HIPEC辅助CT具有更多的复发和转移,而辅助CRT的复发和转移倾向于比辅助CT(OR=1.76,95%CI=1.29-2.42)和甚至辅助RT(OR=1.83,95%CI=0.98-3.40)更少。此外,HIPEC+辅助CT的死亡率低于辅助RT(OR=0.28,95%CI=0.11-0.72),辅助CT(OR=0.45,95%CI=0.23-0.86)和围手术期CT(OR=2.39,95%CI=1.05-5.41)。不良事件(≥3级)分析显示,任何两个辅助治疗组之间均无统计学差异。
    HIPEC与辅助CT的组合似乎是最有效的辅助疗法,这有助于减少肿瘤复发,转移和死亡率-没有增加与毒性相关的手术并发症和不良事件。与单纯CT或RT相比,CRT可以减少复发,转移和死亡率,但增加不良事件。此外,新辅助治疗能有效提高根治性切除率,但新辅助CT往往会增加手术并发症。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of multidisciplinary treatment for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) who underwent radical gastrectomy.
    UNASSIGNED: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of surgery alone, adjuvant chemotherapy (CT), adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), neoadjuvant CT, neoadjuvant RT, neoadjuvant CRT, perioperative CT and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for LAGC were searched. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence and metastasis, long-term mortality, adverse events (grade ≥3), operative complications and R0 resection rate were used as outcome indicators for meta-analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Forty-five RCTs with 10077 participants were finally analysed. Adjuvant CT had higher OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74, 95% credible interval [CI] = 0.66-0.82) and DFS (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.60-0.74) than surgery-alone group. Perioperative CT (odds ratio [OR] = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.19-5.50) and adjuvant CT (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.27-0.86) both had more recurrence and metastasis than HIPEC + adjuvant CT, while adjuvant CRT tended to have less recurrence and metastasis than adjuvant CT (OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.29-2.42) and even adjuvant RT (OR = 1.83, 95% CI = 0.98-3.40). Moreover, the incidence of mortality in HIPEC + adjuvant CT was lower than that in adjuvant RT (OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.11-0.72), adjuvant CT (OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.23-0.86) and perioperative CT (OR = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.05-5.41). Analysis of adverse events (grade ≥3) showed no statistically significant difference between any two adjuvant therapy groups.
    UNASSIGNED: A combination of HIPEC with adjuvant CT seems to be the most effective adjuvant therapy, which contributes to reducing tumour recurrence, metastasis and mortality - without increasing surgical complications and adverse events related to toxicity. Compared with CT or RT alone, CRT can reduce recurrence, metastasis and mortality but increase adverse events. Moreover, neoadjuvant therapy can effectively improve the radical resection rate, but neoadjuvant CT tends to increase surgical complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    未经证实:本研究旨在探讨肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASi)与主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者短期和长期死亡率的关系。
    未经评估:在PubMed中进行了系统搜索,Embase,和Cochrane图书馆数据库,用于2022年3月之前发表的相关研究。纳入符合纳入标准的研究,以评估RASi对AS患者短期(≤30天)和长期(≥1年)死亡率的影响。
    未经评估:共有11项研究纳入荟萃分析。我们的结果表明,RASi降低了主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)后的短期死亡率(OR=0.76,95%CI0.63-0.93,p=0.008)。亚组分析显示,经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后,RASi仍与较低的短期死亡率相关;然而,在接受外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)的患者中,这种关联相对较弱.对于长期死亡率,对未接受AVR的患者进行敏感性分析后,合并OR为1.04(95%CI0.88~1.24,p=0.63).此外,我们的研究证实,RASi可显著降低AVR患者的长期死亡率(OR=0.57,95%CI0.44-0.74,p<0.0001).亚组分析显示,接受RASi治疗的TAVR和SAVR组均具有较低的长期死亡率。
    UNASSIGNED:肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂未改变未接受AVR的AS患者的长期死亡率。然而,RASi降低了接受AVR的患者的短期和长期死亡率。
    UNASSIGNED: The present study aimed to investigate the association of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) with short- and long-term mortality in patients with aortic stenosis (AS).
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases for relevant studies published before March 2022. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included to assess the effect of RASi on short-term (≤30 days) and long-term (≥1 year) mortality in patients with AS.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Our results demonstrated that RASi reduced short-term mortality (OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.93, p = 0.008) after aortic valve replacement (AVR). Subgroup analysis revealed that RASi was still associated with lower short-term mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR); however, the association was relatively weak in patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). For long-term mortality, the pooled OR was 1.04 (95% CI 0.88-1.24, p = 0.63) after sensitivity analysis in patients who did not undergo AVR. In addition, our study confirmed that RASi significantly reduced long-term mortality (OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.44-0.74, p < 0.0001) in patients who underwent AVR. Subgroup analysis showed that both TAVR and SAVR groups treated with RASi had lower long-term mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors did not change long-term mortality in AS patients who did not undergo AVR. However, RASi reduced short- and long-term mortality in patients who underwent AVR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Preoperative frailty may be a strong predictor of adverse postoperative outcomes. We investigated the association between frailty and clinical outcomes in surgical patients admitted to the ICU.
    METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Ovid MEDLINE were searched for relevant articles. We included full-text original English articles that used any frailty measure, reporting results of surgical adult patients (≥18 yr old) admitted to ICUs with mortality as the main outcome. Data on mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital length of stay, and discharge destination were extracted. The quality of included studies and risk of bias were assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Data were synthesised according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines.
    RESULTS: Thirteen observational studies met inclusion criteria. In total, 58 757 patients were included; 22 793 (39.4%) were frail. Frailty was associated with an increased risk of short-term (risk ratio [RR]=2.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.99-3.56) and long-term mortality (RR=2.66; 95% CI: 1.32-5.37). Frail patients had longer ICU length of stay (mean difference [MD]=1.5 days; 95% CI: 0.8-2.2) and hospital length of stay (MD=3.9 days; 95% CI: 1.4-6.5). Duration of mechanical ventilation was longer in frail patients (MD=22 h; 95% CI: 1.7-42.3) and they were more likely to be discharged to a healthcare facility (RR=2.34; 95% CI: 1.36-4.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with frailty requiring postoperative ICU admission for elective and non-elective surgeries had increased risk of mortality, lengthier admissions, and increased likelihood of non-home discharge. Preoperative frailty assessments and risk stratification are essential in patient and clinician planning, and critical care resource utilisation.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42020210121.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Observational data suggest that early- and long-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) differ significantly between men and women, but have demonstrated conflicting results. This study sought to examine early- and long-term mortality with TAVR and SAVR in women versus men.
    METHODS: Electronic search was performed until February 2018 for studies reporting sex-specific mortality following TAVR or isolated SAVR. Data were pooled using random-effects models. Outcomes included rates of early mortality (in hospital or 30 days) and long term (1 year or longer).
    RESULTS: With 35 studies, a total of 80,928 patients were included in our systematic review and meta-analysis, including 40,861 men and 40,067 women. Pooled analyses suggested considerable sex-related differences in longterm mortality following TAVR and SAVR. Following SAVR, women had higher long-term mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.56; P<.001) and a trend toward higher early mortality (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.97-2.97; P=.07) compared to men. Following TAVR, women had lower long-term mortality (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.86; P<.001) and no difference in early mortality (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.96-1.23; P=.17) compared to men.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, women had higher long-term mortality and a trend toward higher early mortality compared to men following SAVR. Following TAVR, women had lower long-term mortality and no difference in early mortality compared with men.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Despite advances in medical knowledge, technology and antimicrobial therapy, infective endocarditis (IE) is still associated with devastating outcomes. No reviews have yet assessed the outcomes of IE patients undergoing short- and long-term outcome evaluation, such as all-cause mortality and IE-related complications. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the short- and long-term mortality, as well as IE-related complications in patients with definite IE.
    A computerized systematic literature search was carried out in PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar from 2000 to August, 2016. Included studies were published studies in English that assessed short-and long-term mortality for adult IE patients. Pooled estimations with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated with DerSimonian-Laird (DL) random-effects model. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were also performed. Publication bias was evaluated using inspection of funnel plots and statistical tests.
    Twenty five observational studies (retrospective, 14; prospective, 11) including 22,382 patients were identified. The overall pooled mortality estimates for IE patients who underwent short- and long-term follow-up were 20% (95% CI: 18.0-23.0, P < 0.01) and 37% (95% CI: 27.0-48.0, P < 0.01), respectively. The pooled prevalence of cardiac complications in patients with IE was found to be 39% (95%CI: 32.0-46.0) while septic embolism and renal complications accounted for 25% (95% CI: 20.0-31) and 19% (95% CI: 14.0-25.0) (all P < 0.01), respectively.
    Irrespective of the follow-up period, a significantly higher mortality rate was reported in IE patients, and the burden of IE-related complications were immense. Further research is needed to assess the determinants of overall mortality in IE patients, as well as well-designed observational studies to conform our results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号