Literacy

识字
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:健康素养(HL)是指个人获得,理解,并应用健康信息对他们的健康做出明智的决定。相反,口腔健康素养(OHL)侧重于个人理解和利用口腔健康信息以保持良好口腔健康的能力。
    目的:本研究提供了全面的文献综述,探讨了HL和OHL的理论基础和实际应用。
    方法:使用以下数据库中的关键字进行了全面搜索:PubMed,谷歌学者,和Cochrane系统评价数据库。
    结果:关于HL各个方面的现有文献,包括HL最常用的定义,概念框架,有限的健康和OHL的后果,总结了。此外,综述了HL和OHL的意义。此外,描述了OHL的父母水平与儿童口腔健康之间的关系。它进一步强调了先前研究中已显示的改善主要护理人员OHL的现代方法。
    结论:了解HL和OHL的重要性对于开发有效的干预措施至关重要,这些干预措施可以解决各种背景的差异并改善口腔健康结果。
    BACKGROUND: Health literacy (HL) refers to an individual\'s ability to access, understand, and apply health information to make informed decisions about their health. On the contrary, oral health literacy (OHL) focuses on an individual\'s ability to understand and utilize oral health information to maintain good oral health.
    OBJECTIVE: This study presents a comprehensive literature review that explores the theoretical foundations and practical applications of HL and OHL.
    METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted using keywords on the following databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
    RESULTS: The existing literature on various aspects of HL, including the most common used definitions of HL, conceptual frameworks, and consequences of limited health and OHL, was summarized. Additionally, the review discussed the significance of HL and OHL. Also, the relation between parent level of OHL and children\'s oral health was described. It further highlights modern approaches that have been shown in previous studies to improve the OHL of primary caregivers.
    CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the significance of HL and OHL is crucial in developing effective interventions that can address disparities and improve oral health outcomes for individuals of all backgrounds.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇综述的目的是评估父母口腔健康素养与儿童口腔健康结果之间的关系。对四个电子数据库进行了全面搜索,以确定截至2023年10月发表的文章。然后筛选符合我们预定标准的文章并评估其资格。更新了Arksey和O'Malley的范围审查框架。识别2964个参考文件后,重复项被删除,离开1992年的头衔。在筛选文章标题和摘要之后,对19篇全文进行了全面审查。范围审查包括19项相关研究。在大多数研究中,儿童口腔健康状况与照顾者的口腔健康素养有关。口腔健康素养低的照顾者的儿童被发现表现出有害的口腔健康习惯,包括刷牙不足和夜间使用瓶子。发现龋齿在父母口腔健康素养较低的儿童中更为常见。在社区中争取最佳的口腔健康素养是一项宝贵而值得的努力。为父母提供技能和知识,对孩子的口腔健康做出适当决定,可以积极预防龋齿并促进更好的口腔健康结果。
    The aim of this review was to evaluate the association between parental oral health literacy and children\'s oral health outcomes. A comprehensive search was conducted across four electronic databases to identify articles that were published up to October 2023. The articles that met our predetermined criteria were then screened and assessed for eligibility. Updated Arksey and O\'Malley\'s scoping review framework was followed. After identifying 2964 references, duplicates were removed, leaving 1992 titles. Following the screening of article titles and abstracts, 19 full-text articles underwent a thorough examination. The scoping review included 19 relevant studies. In most of the studies included, the status of oral health of children is linked to the caregiver\'s oral health literacy. Children of caregivers with low oral health literacy were found to exhibit deleterious oral health habits, including inadequate teeth brushing and the use of bottles at night-time. Dental caries was found to be more common in children whose parents had low oral health literacy. Striving for optimal oral health literacy in the community is a valuable and worthwhile effort. Equipping parents with the skills and knowledge to make appropriate decisions about their children\'s oral health could positively prevent dental caries and promote better oral health outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:许多精神病患者不寻求帮助,这延误了获得推荐治疗的机会。未经治疗的精神病持续时间与不良的医疗保健结果和复发风险增加有关。人们延迟获得治疗的原因尚不清楚。这是第一个系统综述,以综合研究跨临床和亚临床人群的精神病专业和非专业寻求帮助的文献。
    方法:我们搜索了四个数据库(APAPsycINFO,APAPsycarticles,Medline和大英图书馆ETHOS)对定量文献进行了全面的描述。措施的异质性排除了荟萃分析。
    结果:我们确定了符合审查标准的19篇文章(包括9686名参与者)。寻求精神病的帮助与女性有关,有更高的教育水平,有不止一种症状.精神病患者报告耻辱,心理健康素养差和缺乏家庭支持是主要障碍。临床医生报告儿童身体虐待,不安全的依恋和精神病的严重程度作为额外的障碍。我们还发现不同文化的首选帮助来源存在差异。目前没有就可靠的寻求帮助措施达成共识。
    结论:这是研究精神病患者求助行为的第一个系统评价。自信和文化敏感的参与努力应针对有早期逆境历史的人,心理健康素养差,有限的社会支持和更严重的精神病。
    OBJECTIVE: Many people with psychosis do not seek help which delays access to recommended treatments. Duration of untreated psychosis is associated with poor healthcare outcomes and increased risk of relapse. The reasons why people delay accessing treatment remain unclear. This is the first systematic review to synthesise the literature examining professional and non-professional help-seeking in psychosis across clinical and subclinical populations.
    METHODS: We searched four databases (APA PsycINFO, APA PsycArticles, Medline and British Library EThOS) to generate a comprehensive account of the quantitative literature. Heterogeneity of measures precluded a meta-analysis.
    RESULTS: We identified 19 articles (including 9686 participants) that met criteria for the review. Help-seeking in psychosis is associated with being female, having a higher level of education, and experiencing more than one symptom. People with psychosis report stigma, poor mental health literacy and lack of family support as key barriers. Clinicians report childhood physical abuse, insecure attachment and severity of psychosis as additional barriers. We also found differences in preferred sources of help across cultures. There is currently no consensus on reliable help-seeking measures.
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review to examine help-seeking behaviour in psychosis. Assertive and culturally sensitive engagement efforts should be targeted towards people with a history of early adversity, poor mental health literacy, limited social support and more severe psychosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于儿童期言语失用症(CAS)儿童的识字技能或教导他们阅读的有效方法知之甚少。这项系统的范围审查旨在综合有关此问题的知识。
    搜索了9个数据库以识别相关文章。包括的文章按研究设计分类,质量,和对CAS诊断的信心。
    包括23篇文章,17描述了患有CAS的儿童的识字技能和6种试用的识字干预措施。患有CAS的儿童有早期技能缺陷,在后来的学年及以后表现为识字困难。与典型的读者和患有其他言语障碍的儿童相比,他们的结果往往较差。识字障碍的程度和对干预的反应性似乎都与言语障碍的严重程度有关。确定了针对CAS儿童的四种扫盲干预措施。
    患有CAS的儿童有识字困难的高风险,可能需要早期识字干预,以帮助他们取得学业成功。需要进一步的研究来确定患有CAS的儿童的长期识字结果,适当的评估手段,以及系统的综合拼音方法是否是该人群识字教学的有效形式。
    UNASSIGNED: Little is known about the literacy skills of children with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) or effective methods for teaching them to read. This systematic scoping review aimed to synthesise what is known about this issue.
    UNASSIGNED: Nine databases were searched to identify relevant articles. Included articles were categorised by study design, quality, and confidence of CAS diagnosis.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-three articles were included, 17 described literacy skills of children with CAS and six trialled literacy interventions. Children with CAS had early skills deficits that manifest as literacy difficulties in the later school years and beyond. They frequently had poorer outcomes compared with both typical readers and children with other speech disorders. Both the extent of literacy impairment and responsiveness to intervention appear to be related to the severity of speech impairment. Four literacy interventions for children with CAS were identified.
    UNASSIGNED: Children with CAS are at high risk of literacy difficulty and may require early literacy intervention to help them attain academic success. Further research is warranted to determine the longer-term literacy outcomes of children with CAS, appropriate means of assessment, and whether a systematic synthetic phonics approach is an effective form of literacy instruction for this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    支持小学或基础教育的移动设备投资正在增加,必须通过强有力的证据来证明其影响。这项对随机对照试验的系统评价旨在确定移动设备在主流小学教室中支持识字和算术结果的总体影响。
    本系统综述的目的是了解移动设备如何在世界各地的初等/初等教育中使用,特别是,确定在小学教室中使用移动设备进行的活动如何影响所涉及的学生的识字和算术能力。在此背景下,移动设备被定义为平板电脑(包括iPad和其他品牌设备),智能手机(通常具有触摸屏界面和互联网连接的智能手机)和掌上游戏机(通常也具有触摸屏和互联网功能)。感兴趣的干预措施是旨在提高小学/小学(或同等学历)教室中4-12岁儿童的识字和/或算术能力的干预措施。具体来说,该评论旨在回答以下研究问题:-小学教室中的移动设备集成对儿童的识字和算术结果有什么影响?-是否有更有效地支持识字和算术的特定设备?(平板电脑,智能手机,或手持游戏机)-是否有特定的课堂整合活动在支持识字和算术方面具有适度的有效性?-是否有特定的儿童群体,移动设备在支持识字和算术方面更有效?(跨年龄组和性别)。-移动设备对学习的好处是否会持续到研究之外的任何时间?-关于在小学/初等教育中使用移动设备的可用证据的质量如何,专家咨询小组在关键阶段支持审查进程,以确保与当前做法的相关性。
    搜索策略旨在检索已发表和未发表的文献,并合并了相关期刊和其他数据库,重点是教育和社会科学。进行了强大的电子数据库搜索(12个数据库,包括APAPsychInfo,WebofScience,ERIC,英国教育指数等,以及相关政府和其他网站),以及相关期刊和会议记录的手工搜索。还与该领域的知名作者联系,以确定任何正在进行或未发表的研究。所有搜索和作者联系都发生在2020年10月至11月之间。审查小组承认,新的研究可能已经出现,目前还没有被捕获。今后对审查的进一步更新很重要,并将以此处反映的证据为基础。
    该审查包括任何国家(4-12岁)的主流小学/小学/幼儿园教育环境中的儿童,以及在小学教室(或全球等效设备)内使用移动设备(包括平板电脑,智能手机,或手持游戏设备)有意支持识字或算术学习。在研究设计方面,本综述仅纳入随机对照试验.
    通过稳健的搜索策略确定了总共668个参考文献,包括已发表和未发表的文献。重复筛选后,18项相关研究,包括11,126名参与者,14种独特的干预措施,使用稳健方差估计和随机效应荟萃分析模型综合了46项相关结果指标。偏差风险评估是由三位评审员使用ROB2工具评估研究质量,有13项研究被评为有一些担忧,和5具有很高的偏见风险。还提取并分析了与所包括的干预措施类型有关的定性数据,以比较每种干预措施的关键要素。
    A肯定,发现有统计学意义的联合效应(Cohen\sd=0.24,CI0.0707至0.409,p<0.01),证明在研究和干预措施中,使用移动设备进行数学或识字干预的儿童比使用替代设备的儿童获得了更高的算术或识字结果(例如,笔记本电脑或台式电脑)或没有设备(像往常一样上课)。然而,考虑到上述偏倚风险评估,这些结果应谨慎解释(5项研究评估偏倚风险高,13项研究评估为有一些担忧)。由于干预措施和课堂环境差异很大,需要进一步的研究来更全面地了解任何潜在的影响.敏感性分析旨在确定调节因素,包括年龄或性别,屏幕尺寸,干预暴露的频率/剂量,和方案实施特征/活动(基于Puentedura[2009]SAMR技术集成模型)。确定的研究太少了,无法支持对足够的权力进行定量分析,从而得出关于调节因素的有力结论,以及没有足够的数据来确定超出即时测试期的影响。还进行了敏感性分析,以排除被确定为具有高偏倚风险的五项研究,以确定它们可能对总体结果产生的任何影响。
    总的来说,这篇综述表明,对于包括在内的具体干预措施和研究,移动设备在课堂上的使用导致了显著的,对相关儿童的识字和算术结果的积极影响,对它们在小学教育中的持续使用带来积极影响。然而,考虑到上述对偏见风险评估的担忧,不同的情况,干预措施和治疗条件和强度,必须谨慎解释调查结果。该评论还支持需要进一步进行有力的研究,以更好地了解有效的方法,在什么情况下,为了谁,使用移动设备来支持学习。
    UNASSIGNED: Investment in mobile devices to support primary or elementary education is increasing and must be informed by robust evidence to demonstrate impact. This systematic review of randomised controlled trials sought to identify the overall impact of mobile devices to support literacy and numeracy outcomes in mainstream primary classrooms.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this systematic review was to understand how mobile devices are used in primary/elementary education around the world, and in particular, determine how activities undertaken using mobile devices in the primary classroom might impact literacy and numeracy attainment for the pupils involved. Within this context, mobile devices are defined as tablets (including iPads and other branded devices), smartphones (usually those with a touchscreen interface and internet connectivity) and handheld games consoles (again usually with touchscreen and internet-enabled). The interventions of interest were those aimed at improving literacy and/or numeracy for children aged 4-12 within the primary/elementary school (or equivalent) classroom.Specifically, the review aimed to answer the following research questions: -What is the effect of mobile device integration in the primary school classroom on children\'s literacy and numeracy outcomes?-Are there specific devices which are more effective in supporting literacy and numeracy? (Tablets, smartphones, or handheld games consoles)-Are there specific classroom integration activities which moderate effectiveness in supporting literacy and numeracy?-Are there specific groups of children for whom mobile devices are more effective in supporting literacy and numeracy? (Across age group and gender).-Do the benefits of mobile devices for learning last for any time beyond the study?-What is the quality of available evidence on the use of mobile devices in primary/elementary education, and where is further research needed in this regard? An Expert Advisory Group supported the review process at key stages to ensure relevance to current practice.
    UNASSIGNED: The search strategy was designed to retrieve both published and unpublished literature, and incorporated relevant journal and other databases with a focus on education and social sciences. Robust electronic database searches were undertaken (12 databases, including APA PsychInfo, Web of Science, ERIC, British Education Index and others, and relevant government and other websites), as well as a hand-search of relevant journals and conference proceedings. Contact was also made with prominent authors in the field to identify any ongoing or unpublished research. All searches and author contact took place between October and November 2020. The review team acknowledges that new studies will likely have emerged since and are not captured at this time. A further update to the review in the future is important and would build on the evidence reflected here.
    UNASSIGNED: The review included children within mainstream primary/elementary/kindergarten education settings in any country (aged 4-12), and interventions or activities initiated within the primary school classroom (or global equivalent) that used mobile devices (including tablets, smartphones, or hand-held gaming devices) to intentionally support literacy or numeracy learning. In terms of study design, only Randomised Controlled Trials were included in the review.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 668 references were identified through a robust search strategy including published and unpublished literature. Following duplicate screening, 18 relevant studies, including 11,126 participants, 14 unique interventions, and 46 relevant outcome measures were synthesised using Robust Variance Estimation and a random effects meta-analysis model. Risk of Bias assessment was undertaken by three reviewers using the ROB2 tool to assess the quality of studies, with 13 studies rated as having some concerns, and 5 as having high risk of bias. Qualitative data was also extracted and analysed in relation to the types of interventions included to allow a comparison of the key elements of each.
    UNASSIGNED: A positive, statistically significant combined effect was found (Cohen\'s d = 0.24, CI 0.0707 to 0.409, p < 0.01), demonstrating that in the studies and interventions included, children undertaking maths or literacy interventions using mobile devices achieved higher numeracy or literacy outcomes than those using an alternative device (e.g., a laptop or desktop computer) or no device (class activities as usual). However these results should be interpreted with caution given the risk of bias assessment noted above (5 studies rated high risk of bias and 13 rated as having some concerns). As the interventions and classroom circumstances differed quite widely, further research is needed to understand any potential impact more fully.Sensitivity analysis aimed to identify moderating factors including age or gender, screen size, frequency/dosage of intervention exposure, and programme implementation features/activities (based on Puentedura\'s [2009] SAMR model of technology integration). There were too few studies identified to support quantitative analysis of sufficient power to draw robust conclusions on moderating factors, and insufficient data to determine impact beyond immediate post-test period. Sensitivty analysis was also undertaken to exclude the five studies identified as having a high risk of bias, to identify any impact they may have on overall findings.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, this review demonstrates that for the specific interventions and studies included, mobile device use in the classroom led to a significant, positive effect on literacy and numeracy outcomes for the children involved, bringing positive implications for their continued use in primary education. However given the concerns on risk of bias assessment reported above, the differing circumstances, interventions and treatment conditions and intensities, the findings must be interpreted with caution. The review also supports the need for further robust research to better understand what works, under what circumstances, and for whom, in the use of mobile devices to support learning.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:本研究旨在评估文献报道的护生的信息学能力。
    背景:护理信息学能力在现代医疗保健领域具有巨大的意义,使其成为护理专业学生毕业并开始职业生涯之前的重要要求。由于护理专业和医疗保健系统的复杂性增加,护士应将循证护理信息学(NI)整合到常规程序中,以管理急性和慢性疾病。
    方法:系统评价。
    方法:PubMed,Scopus,WebofScience,直到2023年12月,EMBASE都被搜索到评估学生护理信息学能力的任何相关研究。
    结果:在对13篇文章的系统综述中,护理信息学似乎在护理专业学生中很熟悉。大多数参与者通常都有能力,平均总护理信息学能力得分为3.4分。此外,他们报告了临床信息学作用的良好分数(平均值=2.63),姿态(M=3.7),基本的计算机知识和技能(M=3.9),应用计算机技能(M=2.5),和无线设备技能(M=3.2)。然而,由于使用了结构不同的评估工具及其不同的截止值,这些结果受到限制.
    结论:护理信息学能力对医疗保健系统提供的服务质量有很大影响。它受到几个因素的影响,如学生以前的计算机经验和课内和课外接触到的信息学知识和技能。现有文献缺乏对护生能力的准确判断。但他们之间似乎从公平到好不一样。所以,建议将护理信息学作为必修课,而不是选修护理学士学位。这有助于为未来的护士准备所需的知识和技能,以便更好地做出临床决策。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the nursing students\' informatics competency reported in the literature.
    BACKGROUND: Nursing informatics competency holds immense significance in the modern healthcare landscape, making it a vital requirement for nursing students before they graduate and embark on their professional careers. Nurses should integrate evidence-based nursing informatics (NI) into routine procedures to manage acute and chronic illnesses due to the increased complexity of the nursing profession and the healthcare systems.
    METHODS: A systematic review.
    METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched till December 2023 for any relevant studies evaluating the nursing informatics competency among students.
    RESULTS: In this systematic review of 13 articles, the nursing informatics seems to be familiar among nursing students. Most of the included participants were generally competent, with an average total nursing informatics competency score of 3.4. In addition, they reported good scores for the clinical informatics role (Mean = 2.63), attitude (M= 3.7), basic computer knowledge and skills (M= 3.9), applied computer skills (M= 2.5), and wireless device skills (M= 3.2). However, these results were limited due to the use of structurally different assessment tools and their different cutoff values.
    CONCLUSIONS: Nursing informatics competency has a great impact on the quality of services provided by healthcare systems. It is affected by several factors, such as the student\'s previous computer experience and the curricular and extracurricular exposure to informatics knowledge and skills. The available literature lacks a precise judgment on the competency of nursing students. But it seems to vary from fair to good among them. So, it is recommended to include nursing informatics as an obligatory course rather than an elective in the nursing baccalaureate. This helps prepare future nurses with the required knowledge and skills for better clinical decision-making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有限的健康素养是导致不良健康结果的社会健康决定因素。一般知识和健康素养相关,并可能影响诊断和治疗理解。有限的识字率会导致女性接受更高的侵入性手术治疗,包括子宫切除术.这篇综述探讨了健康素养水平对子宫肌瘤认知的影响。诊断,和治疗。PubMed,CINAHL,和学术搜索Premier搜索2012年1月1日至2022年12月31日之间发表的文章。关键词子宫肌瘤,肌瘤,肌瘤,平滑肌瘤,并使用了健康素养。总共退回了四篇文章。在低收入和受教育程度低的参与者中发现子宫切除术的比率增加,以及那些健康素养有限的人。子宫切除术是切除子宫,从而剥夺了女性生育孩子的权利。虽然需要加大力度了解健康素养水平对子宫肌瘤诊断和治疗的差异和不平等的影响,仍然需要有针对性的患者教育和社区教育,以确保患者了解子宫肌瘤的诊断和治疗方案.
    Limited health literacy is a social health determinant leading to poor health outcomes. General and health literacy correlate and can impact diagnosis and treatment understanding. Limited literacy can lead to women receiving more significant rates of invasive surgical treatment, including hysterectomies. This review explores the impact of health literacy levels on uterine fibroid awareness, diagnosis, and treatment. PubMed, CINAHL, and Academic Search Premier searched articles published between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2022. The keywords uterine fibroids, fibroids, myomas, leiomyomas, and health literacy were used. A total of four articles were returned. Increased rates of hysterectomies were found among participants with low income and education, as well as those with limited health literacy. Hysterectomies are the removal of the uterus and thus removes a woman\'s right to have children. While increased efforts are needed to understand the impact of health literacy levels on disparities and inequities in uterine fibroid diagnosis and treatment, there is still a need for targeted patient education and community-based education that ensures patient understanding of the diagnosis and treatment options for uterine fibroids.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    从高收入国家的研究中得出的一个有力的发现是,生活在资源匮乏的家庭中的儿童容易受到语言和识字方面的困难,但在低收入和中等收入(LMI)国家,对这种联系的了解却很少。我们对来自43个LMI国家的6,678个相关性进行了荟萃分析。总的来说,结果表明,家庭语言和识字环境与儿童的语言和识字技能之间存在小但显著的关联(r=.08)。在检查了一系列主持人之后,与家庭家教相比,成人识字实践和家庭书籍与儿童的语言和识字技能的关联明显更大。使用定制测量的研究表明,与使用跨多个站点的通用测量的研究(r=.06)相比,家庭属性与儿童结果之间的关联更为明显(r=.14)。已发表的研究显示,与未发表的研究相比,关联明显更大,与相对平等的社会相比,收入不平等程度更大的国家表现出更大的联系。我们得出的结论是,小的整体协会不应该被视为对缺乏,或者在LMI国家,家庭学习环境与儿童的语言和识字技能之间的微小关系正在消失。相反,检测这种关系的一个重要因素是,评估必须更好地反映不同文化中房屋的性质,以捕捉人口的真实变化。这种情境测量将导致家庭学习环境的包容性概念化,并可以更好地告知干预计划,以提高儿童的教育成功。许多LMI国家的关键目标。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024APA,保留所有权利)。
    A robust finding from research in high-income countries is that children living in resource-poor homes are vulnerable to difficulties with language and literacy but less is known about this association in low- and middle-income (LMI) countries. We present a meta-analysis of 6,678 correlations from studies in 43 LMI countries. Overall, the results indicate a small but significant association (r = .08) between home language and literacy environment and children\'s language and literacy skills. After examining a range of moderators, adult literacy practices and books-at-home had a significantly larger association with children\'s language and literacy skills than did home tutoring. Studies using customized measures demonstrated a more marked association between home attributes and children\'s outcomes (r = .14) than studies using a common measure across multiple sites (r = .06). Published studies showed significantly larger associations than unpublished studies, and countries with greater income inequality showed a larger association than relatively egalitarian societies. We conclude that the small overall association should not be taken as support for the absence of, or a vanishingly small relationship between the home learning environment and children\'s language and literacy skills in LMI countries. Rather, an important factor in detecting this relationship is that assessments must better reflect the nature of homes in different cultures to capture true variation in the population. Such contextually situated measurement would lead to an inclusive conceptualization of home learning environments and can better inform intervention programs to enhance children\'s educational success, a critical target for many LMI countries. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:本系统综述(PROSPEROID:CRD42022226375)旨在确定前列腺癌男性的电子健康素养,和他们的照顾者。
    方法:8个数据库(MEDLINE,Scopus,EMBASE,网络科学,PsycINFO,ERIC,CINAHL,从成立之初到2023年12月,搜索了CochraneCENTRAL)和灰色文献来源(例如GoogleScholar)。如果评估前列腺癌男性的电子健康/数字素养,或他们的照顾者,和健康结果协会。病例报告等格式,审查文件被排除在外。记录和全文经过独立筛选和数据提取。作者的分歧通过讨论得以解决。采用混合方法评价工具(MMAT)对纳入文献进行评价,结果的叙事综合。
    结果:检索了21,581条记录,7篇文章符合纳入标准。异质领域的特点是缺乏现代电子健康素养测量工具。结果表明,新手使用Web1.0技术的eHealth素养。未经验证的扫盲措施显示出不同的结果,而健康结果影响的范围和可靠性有限。
    结论:前列腺癌幸存者的eHealth素养水平可能是新手,需要进一步调查.
    结论:作为患者沟通实践的一部分实施的数字技术/资源应进行质量审查,并根据患者的电子健康素养能力和/或需求量身定制。
    OBJECTIVE: This systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022226375) aimed to identify the eHealth literacy of men with prostate cancer, and their caregivers.
    METHODS: 8 databases (MEDLINE, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Web Of Science, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL) and grey literature sources (e.g. Google Scholar) were searched from inception to December 2023. Articles were included if assessing eHealth/digital literacy of men with prostate cancer, or their carers\', and health outcome associations. Formats such as case reports, and review papers were excluded. Records and full texts underwent independent screening and data extraction. Author disagreements were resolved by discussion. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to appraise included literature, with narrative synthesis of results.
    RESULTS: 21,581 records were retrieved, with 7 articles satisfying inclusion criteria. A heterogenous field was characterised with lack of modern eHealth literacy measurement tools identified. Results suggest novice eHealth literacy using web 1.0 technologies. Non-validated measures of literacy demonstrate mixed results, while health outcome effects limited in scope and reliability.
    CONCLUSIONS: Prostate cancer survivors\' eHealth literacy levels is likely novice, and requires further investigation.
    CONCLUSIONS: Digital technologies/resources implemented as part of patient communication practices should be vetted for quality, and tailored to patients\' eHealth literacy abilities and/or needs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    这篇综述调查了注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童和青少年的技术使用情况及其在语言学习中的学业成绩,以及他们对技术使用的态度。目标是整合这些信息,以了解如何向该人群提供有关第一和第二语言学习的技术,以及它的使用是多么有效和适当,以及在学习过程中利益相关者如何看待它。进行了系统的审查,在最后的筛选过程之后,分析了15项研究,其中大多数是关于第一语言学习(n=11)。大多数研究发现,技术使用对学生的语言技能有积极的影响,学生倾向于发现它更有动力和吸引力。虽然这些技术似乎是提高技能的有前途的工具,必须进行进一步的研究,尤其是在第二语言学习领域。
    This review investigates the use of technology for children and adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and their academic achievements in language learning, as well as their attitudes towards technology use. The goal is to integrate this information in order to learn how technology is provided to this population regarding first and second language learning, and also how effective and appropriate its use is and how it is perceived by stakeholders in the learning process. A systematic review was conducted, and after the final screening process, 15 studies were analysed, the majority of which were about first language learning (n = 11). Most studies found that technology use has a positive impact on students\' language skills and that students tend to find it more motivating and engaging. While these technologies seem to be promising tools for improving skills, further studies must be conducted, especially in the field of second language learning.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号