Intervertebral disc degeneration

椎间盘退变
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:腰椎退行性疾病造成了巨大的健康负担,提示探索先进的手术方法,如斜腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)。这项荟萃分析旨在评估OLIF前路螺钉固定(OLIF-AF)与OLIF后路椎弓根固定(OLIF-PF)在解决这些疾病方面的比较疗效。
    方法:跨多个数据库的系统搜索确定了符合纳入标准的五项研究,共有271名患者。比较分析包括与融合率相关的主要和次要结果,术中参数,患者报告的措施,和射线照相评估。
    结果:主要结果分析显示OLIF-AF和OLIF-PF的总融合率无统计学差异。然而,次要结果揭示了OLIF-AF的明显优势,与OLIF-PF相比,显示出更低的术中失血量和减少的手术时间。尽管如此,患者报告的结果,包括疼痛评分和功能评估等指标,以及射线照相参数,这两种技术之间没有明显的差异。
    结论:虽然OLIF-AF在术中参数方面显示出良好的结果,例如减少失血和缩短手术时间,与OLIF-PF相比,患者报告的结局和影像学评估无显著差异.对研究结果的解释必须考虑样本量和研究异质性的局限性。未来的调查与更大,为了确认这些初步发现,并理解这些OLIF技术在治疗腰椎退行性疾病方面的实际临床影响,必须进行更多样化的队列和延长的随访.
    OBJECTIVE: Lumbar degenerative diseases impose a substantial health burden, prompting the exploration of advanced surgical approaches such as Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF). This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the comparative efficacy of OLIF with anterior screw fixation (OLIF-AF) against OLIF with posterior pedicle fixation (OLIF-PF) in addressing these conditions.
    METHODS: A systematic search across multiple databases identified five studies meeting inclusion criteria, incorporating a total of 271 patients. Comparative analysis encompasses primary and secondary outcomes related to fusion rates, intraoperative parameters, patient-reported measures, and radiographic assessments.
    RESULTS: Primary outcome analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in total fusion rates between OLIF-AF and OLIF-PF. However, secondary outcomes revealed distinct advantages in OLIF-AF, showcasing lower intraoperative blood loss and reduced operative times compared to OLIF-PF. Nonetheless, patient-reported outcomes, encompassing measures such as pain scores and functional assessments, as well as radiographic parameters, exhibited no significant variations between the two techniques.
    CONCLUSIONS: While OLIF-AF displayed favorable results in intraoperative parameters, such as reduced blood loss and shorter operative times, it did not significantly differ in patient-reported outcomes and radiographic assessments compared to OLIF-PF. Interpretation of findings must consider limitations in sample sizes and study heterogeneity. Future investigations with larger, more diverse cohorts and extended follow-ups are imperative to confirm these preliminary findings and comprehend the actual clinical impact of these OLIF techniques in managing lumbar degenerative diseas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腰椎退行性疾病(LDD)是老年人下腰痛的主要原因之一。手术治疗通常涉及减压手术和融合技术;然而,老年患者的标准融合手术并发症发生率较高,住院时间,和重新接纳。尽管微创手术可以降低风险并缩短住院时间,它仍然不能消除融合或内固定的固有并发症,尤其是体弱者。因此,有必要寻找一种既能降低手术风险又能有效减少融合或内固定固有并发症的手术技术。目的评价经皮骨水泥椎间盘成形术治疗LDDs的临床疗效及可行性。
    方法:遵循系统评价和Meta分析指南的首选报告项目。搜索策略是在PubMed中进行的,WebofScience,MEDLINE,谷歌学者,中国国家知识基础设施,中国生物医药光盘,和医学知识网络引文数据库。通过非随机研究方法学指数(MINORS)评分评估纳入研究的质量。通过非随机干预研究(ROBINS-I)工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险(RoB)。在RevMan5.4中对主要结果进行了总结和分析。
    结果:最后,我们纳入了10篇文章,共收集了359名患者,其中男性171人(47.63%),女性180人(52.37%),平均年龄73.09±2.74岁。非随机研究方法学指数(MINORS)工具用于评估本研究中包含的文章,10项回顾性研究的方法学质量评分为7~11分.使用ROBINS-I工具评估RoB。关键RoB在4/10文章中被发现,在5/10文章中发现了高RoB,在1/10的文章中发现了中间RoB。研究发现,第1天的视觉模拟量表得分(平均差[MD]:3.48;95%置信区间[CI]:3.04,3.93;I2=0%),3至6个月(MD:4.05;95%CI:3.53,4.56;I2=65%),术后12~24个月(MD:4.00;95%CI:3.53,4.47;I2=45%)与术前比较差异有统计学意义。同时,1天的Oswestry残疾指数(MD:42.67;95%CI:36.78,48.57;I2=76%),3至6个月(MD:42.64;95%CI:34.44,50.83;I2=91%),术后12~24个月(MD:49.22;95%CI:42.23、56.22;I2=83%)与术前仍有显著差异。对异质性高(I2>50%)的结果进行敏感性分析和亚组分析。结果仍有显著的统计学差异。
    结论:研究表明,经皮骨水泥椎间盘成形术是治疗LDDs的潜在干预措施,能有效缓解疼痛,改善功能障碍。
    BACKGROUND: Lumbar degenerative disease (LDD) is one of the main causes of low back pain in the elderly. Surgical treatment usually involves decompression surgery and fusion techniques; however, standard fusion surgery in elderly patients is associated with a higher rate of complications, hospital length of stay, and readmission. Although minimally invasive surgery can reduce risk and shorten hospital stays, it still cannot eliminate the inherent complications of fusion or internal fixation, especially in frail patients. Therefore, it is necessary to find a surgical technology that can not only reduce the risk of operation but also effectively reduce the inherent complications of fusion or internal fixation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and feasibility of percutaneous cement discoplasty for the treatment of LDDs.
    METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. The search strategy was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biology Medicine Disc, and Medical Knowledge Network Citation Database. The quality of the included study was assessed by the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) score. The risk of bias (RoB) about the included study was assessed by the Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. The main results were summarized and analyzed in RevMan 5.4.
    RESULTS: Finally, we included 10 articles and collected a total of 359 patients, including 171 males (47.63%) and 180 females (52.37%), with an average age of 73.09 ± 2.74 years. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool was used to assess the articles included in this study, the methodological quality score of 10 retrospective studies varied from 7 to 11. The RoB was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Critical RoB was found in 4/10 articles, high RoB was found in 5/10 articles, and intermediate RoB was found in 1/10 articles. The study found that the Visual Analog Scale scores at 1 day (mean difference [MD]: 3.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.04, 3.93; I2 = 0%), 3 to 6 months (MD: 4.05; 95% CI: 3.53, 4.56; I2 = 65%), and 12 to 24 months (MD: 4.00; 95% CI: 3.53, 4.47; I2 = 45%) after operation were significantly different from those before operation. Meanwhile, the Oswestry Disability Index at 1 day (MD: 42.67; 95% CI: 36.78, 48.57; I2 = 76%), 3 to 6 months (MD: 42.64; 95% CI: 34.44, 50.83; I2 = 91%), and 12 to 24 months (MD: 49.22; 95% CI: 42.23, 56.22; I2 = 83 %) after operation were still significantly different from those before operation. The results with high heterogeneity (I2>50%) were analyzed by sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis. The results still have significant statistical differences.
    CONCLUSIONS: Studies have shown that percutaneous cement discoplasty is a potential intervention for the treatment of LDDs, which can effectively relieve pain and improve dysfunction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:近年来,深度学习(DL)技术越来越多地用于腰椎间盘退变的诊断和治疗。本研究旨在评估DL技术在磁共振(MR)图像中的IVD分割性能,并探索改进策略。
    方法:我们开发了PRISMA系统审查协议,并系统地审查了使用DL算法框架基于截至2024年4月10日发布的MR图像进行IVD分割的研究。诊断准确性研究质量评估-2工具用于评估方法学质量,并计算合并骰子相似系数(DSC)得分和联合交集(IoU)以评估分割性能。
    结果:本系统综述包括45项研究,其中16项提供了完整的分割性能数据,并纳入了定量荟萃分析.结果表明,DL模型显示出令人满意的IVD分割性能,合并DSC为0.900(95%置信区间[CI]:0.887-0.914),IoU为0.863(95%CI:0.730-0.995)。然而,亚组分析没有显示因素对IVD分割性能的显著影响,包括网络维度,算法类型,出版年份,患者数量,扫描方向,数据增强,和交叉验证。
    结论:本研究强调了DL技术在IVD分割中的潜力及其进一步应用。然而,由于算法框架和纳入研究结果报告的异质性,结论应谨慎解释。未来的研究应该集中在大规模数据集上训练广义模型,以增强其临床应用。
    BACKGROUND: In recent years, deep learning (DL) technology has been increasingly used for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration. This study aims to evaluate the performance of DL technology for IVD segmentation in magnetic resonance (MR) images and explore improvement strategies.
    METHODS: We developed a PRISMA systematic review protocol and systematically reviewed studies that used DL algorithm frameworks to perform IVD segmentation based on MR images published up to April 10, 2024. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was used to assess methodological quality, and the pooled dice similarity coefficient (DSC) score and Intersection over Union (IoU) were calculated to evaluate segmentation performance.
    RESULTS: 45 studies were included in this systematic review, of which 16 provided complete segmentation performance data and were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. The results indicated that DL models showed satisfactory IVD segmentation performance, with a pooled DSC of 0.900 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.887-0.914) and IoU of 0.863 (95% CI: 0.730-0.995). However, the subgroup analysis did not show significant effects of factors on IVD segmentation performance, including network dimensionality, algorithm type, publication year, number of patients, scanning direction, data augmentation, and cross-validation.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the potential of DL technology in IVD segmentation and its further applications. However, due to the heterogeneity in algorithm frameworks and result reporting of the included studies, the conclusions should be interpreted with caution. Future research should focus on training generalized models on large-scale datasets to enhance their clinical application.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    椎间盘核置换(NR)是一种具有挑战性的手术技术,用作早期椎间盘突出症的医学治疗,以恢复椎间盘高度和运动节段的生物力学功能。可以减轻腰痛。外科手术包括通过经由产生的孔进入纤维环,用替代物去除和替换变性的髓核。几十年来,细胞核置换一直是一个重要的问题,导致不同替代品的开发。最初的想法可以追溯到1950年代,从那以后,可以识别一百多个核替换概念。有许多尝试和一些临床试验;然而,经过70多年的研究,尚未确定髓核置换的金标准。这篇综述旨在收集文献中报道的不同细胞核置换,从而理解失败的原因,什么可以改进,什么是未来的机会。在PubMed上使用基于关键字的搜索对文献进行了系统的回顾,WebofScience,和Scopus数据库来检测临床医生和工程师过去提出的所有细胞核置换。提取了几项研究,对多年来的主要细胞核置换进行了研究,包括那些获得CE标志的,FDA批准,或IDE批准,也参与临床试验。本综述共纳入116项研究。提取的数据涉及多年来提出的核替换,以创建尽可能完整的历史背景,包括他们的机械和生物力学特性以及多年来进行的临床试验。髓椎间盘置换术已经被探索了很多年。不幸的是,即使在今天,这种外科手术仍然没有安全和确定的东西。这篇综述概述了细胞核置换的历史。一个突破可能是纤维环闭合或密封以及组织工程和医学再生技术的改进,这肯定可以确保在这种临床治疗的未来获得更高的NR植入成功率。目前尚不清楚这种临床实践的未来。只有科学研究才能回答这个问题:核置换仍然是一种可能的临床解决方案吗?
    Disc nucleus replacement (NR) is a challenging surgical technique used as a medical treatment for early-stage disc herniation to restore disc height and the biomechanical function of a motion segment, which may reduce low back pain. The surgical procedure involves the removal and replacement of the degenerated nucleus pulposus with a substitute by accessing the annulus fibrosos via a created hole. Over the decades, nucleus replacement has been an important issue, leading to the development of different substitute alternatives. The first ideas are dated to the 1950s and since then, more than a hundred nucleus replacement concepts can be identified. There were numerous attempts and several clinical trials; however, after more than 70 years of research, no gold standard for nucleus pulposus replacement has been identified. This review aims to collect the different nucleus replacements reported in the literature, thus understanding what failed, what could be improved and what are the opportunities for the future. A systematic review of the literature was performed using a keyword-based search on PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to detect all nucleus replacements presented in the past by clinicians and engineers. Several studies were extracted from which the main nucleus replacements over the years were investigated, including the ones that received CE mark, FDA approval, or IDE approval and, also those involved in clinical trials. A total of 116 studies were included in this review. The extracted data concern the nucleus replacements proposed over the years to create a historical background as complete as possible, including their mechanical and biomechanical characterization and the clinical trials conducted over the years. Nucleus disc arthroplasty has been explored for many years. Unfortunately, even today there is still nothing safe and definitive in this surgical practice. This review provides an overview of the nucleus replacement history. A breakthrough could be the improvements in technologies for the annulus fibrous closing or sealing and the tissue engineering and medical regenerative techniques which could certainly ensure a higher NR implantation success rate in the future of this clinical treatment. It is not yet clear what is the future of this clinical practice. Only scientific research can answer the question: is the nucleus replacement still a possible clinical solution?
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨乳香没药治疗腰椎椎间退行性疾病(LIDD)的疗效。乳香没药的活性成分是通过独特的中药系统药理学平台(TCMSP)回收的。用DisGeNET和Genecards数据库筛选LIDD相关靶基因。然后,STRING和Cytoscape用于分析蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用网络。DAVID用于分析基因本体论(GO)和京都基因和基因组百科全书(KEGG)富集。最后,AutoDockVina和Pymol分子用于对接分子,以验证活性成分和关键靶标的结合力。如祥(RX)-莫耀(MY)中确定的105个LIDD相关目标涉及53个活性成分。此外,进行了拓扑分析,以确定12个关键目标。根据GO&KEGG的分析结果,RX-MY通过参与多种途径和生物过程对治疗LIDD具有重要意义。如炎症反应过程的信号通路,MAP激酶活性,TNF,和MAPK,等。根据码头结果,活性成分氧代酸,酸,isofuquierone,(7S,8R,9S,10R,13S,14S,RX-MY中的17Z)-17-亚乙基-7-羟基-10,13-二甲基-1,2,6,7,8,9,11,12,14,15-十氢环戊[a]菲-3,16-二。本研究首次揭示了治疗LIDD的基本药理作用和RX-MY相关机制。可以预测,该结果可能为RX-MY提供替代NSAIDs的治疗计划,并有必要研究LIDD的新治疗替代方案。然而,这些预测应通过相关药理试验加以验证.
    To investigate the efficacy of Frankincense-Myrrh in lumbar Intervertebral degenerative diseases (LIDD). The active components of frankincense-myrrh was retrieved with a unique system pharmacology platform for Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology (TCMSP). The LIDD-related target genes were screened with DisGeNET and Genecards databases. Then, STRING & Cytoscape were used for analyzing the Protein-Protein Interaction network. DAVID was used for analyzing Gene Ontology (GO) & Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment. Finally, molecules of AutoDockVina and Pymol were used for docking the molecules for verifying active ingredients and key targets\' binding force. The 105 LIDD-related targets identified in Ruxiang (RX)-Moyao (MY) involve 53 active ingredients. In addition, topological analysis was conducted for identifying the 12 key targets. According to the analysis results of GO & KEGG, RX-MY is significant for treating LIDD through participating in many pathways and biological processes, such as signaling pathways of inflammatory response reactive process, MAP kinase activity, TNF, and MAPK, etc. According to the dock results, the active components oxo-tirucalic, acid, isofouquierone, (7S, 8R, 9S, 10R, 13S, 14S,17Z)-17-ethylidene-7-hydroxy-10,13-dimethyl-1,2,6,7,8,9,11,12,14,15-decahydrocyclopenta [a] phenanthrene-3,16-dion in RX-MY binds actively. The basic pharmacological action and RX-MY-related mechanism in the treatment of LIDD was revealed in this study for the first time. It is predicted that the results may provide a treatment plan for RX-MY with replacement of NSAIDs and warrant investigation of new therapeutic alternatives for LIDD. However, these predictions should be validated by relevant pharmacological trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脊柱疾病,包括椎间盘退变(IDD),强直性脊柱炎,脊髓损伤和其他非感染性脊柱疾病,严重影响患者的生活质量。目前对IDD和其他脊柱疾病的治疗只能缓解症状,不能完全治愈疾病。因此,迫切需要探索这些疾病的原因并开发新的治疗方法。长链非编码RNA(lncRNA),一种非编码RNA,来源丰富多样,有许多功能,在IDD等脊柱疾病的发生发展中起着重要作用。然而,lncRNAs的作用机制尚未完全阐明,在使用lncRNAs作为新的治疗靶标方面仍然存在重大挑战。本文回顾了来源,lncRNAs的分类和功能,并介绍了lncRNAs在脊柱疾病中的作用,例如IDD,和他们的治疗潜力。
    Spinal diseases, including intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD), ankylosing spondylitis, spinal cord injury and other non‑infectious spinal diseases, severely affect the quality of life of patients. Current treatments for IDD and other spinal diseases can only relieve symptoms and do not completely cure the disease. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore the causes of these diseases and develop new treatment approaches. Long non‑coding RNA (lncRNA), a form of non‑coding RNA, is abundant in diverse sources, has numerous functions, and plays an important role in the occurrence and development of spinal diseases such as IDD. However, the mechanism of action of lncRNAs has not been fully elucidated, and significant challenges remain in the use of lncRNAs as new therapeutic targets. The present article reviews the sources, classification and functions of lncRNAs, and introduces the role of lncRNAs in spinal diseases, such as IDD, and their therapeutic potential.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:作为机器人辅助(RA)手术中的新兴技术,目前的证据缺乏对其应用于经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)的潜在益处的充分支持.
    目的:我们旨在研究RATLIF在治疗腰椎退行性疾病方面是否优于FGTLIF。
    方法:我们通过搜索PubMed,系统回顾了截至2022年7月比较RA与FGTLIF治疗腰椎退行性疾病的研究,Embase,WebofScience,CINAHL(EBSCO),中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),万方,VIP,还有Cochrane图书馆,以及已发表评论文章的参考文献。纳入队列研究(CSs)和随机对照试验(RCTs)。评价标准包括经皮椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性,近端小关节侵犯(FJV),辐射暴露,手术持续时间,估计失血量(EBL),和手术翻修。使用Cochrane偏倚风险和ROBINS-I工具评估方法学质量。使用随机效应模型,并采用标准化平均差(SMD)作为效应测量。我们根据手术类型进行了亚组分析,使用的特定机器人系统,和研究设计。两名研究者独立筛选摘要和全文文章,证据的确定性使用等级(建议评估的等级,开发和评估)方法。
    结果:我们的搜索发现了539篇文章,其中21人符合定量分析的纳入标准。荟萃分析显示,RA的“临床可接受”准确性比FG高1.03倍(RR:1.0382,95%CI:1.0273-1.0493)。RA的“完美”准确率比FG组高1.12倍(RR:1.1167,95%CI:1.0726-1.1626)。在近端FJV的情况下,我们的结果表明,与FG组相比,RA椎弓根螺钉置入患者的发生率降低了74%(RR:0.2606,95CI:0.2063-0.3293).17个CS和2个RCT报告了持续时间。CSs结果表明RA和FG组之间没有显着差异(SMD:0.1111,95CI:-0.391-0.6131),但RCT结果表明,接受RA-TLIF的患者比FG需要更多的手术时间(SMD:3.7213,95CI:3.0756-4.3669).16个CSs和2个RCT报告了EBL。结果表明,接受RA椎弓根螺钉置入的患者的EBL少于FG组(CSs:SMD:-1.9151,95CI:-3.1265-0.7036,RCTs:SMD:-5.9010,95CI:-8.7238-3.0782)。对于辐射暴露,CSs的结果表明,RA和FG组之间的辐射时间没有显着差异(SMD:-0.5256,95CI:-1.4357-0.3845),但接受RA椎弓根螺钉置入的患者的辐射剂量低于FG组(SMD:-2.2682,95CI:-3.1953-1.3411).四个CSs和一个RCT报告了修订病例数。CSs结果提示RA组与FG组的翻修例数差异无统计学意义(RR:0.4087,95%CI0.1592-1.0495)。我们的发现受到纳入研究的残余异质性的限制,这可能会限制对结果的解释。
    结论:在TLIF中,与FG方法相比,RA技术在椎弓根螺钉放置方面显示出更高的精度。这种准确性有助于诸如保护相邻小关节以及减少术中辐射剂量和失血的优点。然而,与RA手术相关的术前准备时间越长,手术时间和放射时间与FG技术相当.目前,FG螺钉的放置仍然是主要的方法,临床外科医生对其应用有更高的熟练程度。因此,将RA纳入TLIF手术可能不是最佳选择.
    背景:PROSPEROCRD42023441600.
    BACKGROUND: As an emerging technology in robot-assisted (RA) surgery, the potential benefits of its application in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) lack substantial support from current evidence.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate whether the RA TLIF is superior to FG TLIF in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease.
    METHODS: We systematically reviewed studies comparing RA versus FG TLIF for lumbar degenerative diseases through July 2022 by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL (EBSCO), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang, VIP, and the Cochrane Library, as well as the references of published review articles. Both cohort studies (CSs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Evaluation criteria included the accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screw placement, proximal facet joint violation (FJV), radiation exposure, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical revision. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias and ROBINS-I Tool. Random-effects models were used, and the standardized mean difference (SMD) was employed as the effect measure. We conducted subgroup analyses based on surgical type, the specific robot system used, and the study design. Two investigators independently screened abstracts and full-text articles, and the certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.
    RESULTS: Our search identified 539 articles, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that RA had 1.03-folds higher \"clinically acceptable\" accuracy than FG (RR: 1.0382, 95% CI: 1.0273-1.0493). And RA had 1.12-folds higher \"perfect\" accuracy than FG group (RR: 1.1167, 95% CI: 1.0726-1.1626). In the case of proximal FJV, our results indicate a 74% reduction in occurrences for patients undergoing RA pedicle screw placement compared to those in the FG group (RR: 0.2606, 95%CI: 0.2063- 0.3293). Seventeen CSs and two RCTs reported the duration of time. The results of CSs suggest that there is no significant difference between RA and FG group (SMD: 0.1111, 95%CI: -0.391-0.6131), but the results of RCTs suggest that the patients who underwent RA-TLIF need more surgery time than FG (SMD: 3.7213, 95%CI: 3.0756-4.3669). Sixteen CSs and two RCTs reported the EBL. The results suggest that the patients who underwent RA pedicle screw placement had fewer EBL than FG group (CSs: SMD: -1.9151, 95%CI: -3.1265-0.7036, RCTs: SMD: -5.9010, 95%CI: -8.7238-3.0782). For radiation exposure, the results of CSs suggest that there is no significant difference in radiation time between RA and FG group (SMD: -0.5256, 95%CI: -1.4357-0.3845), but the patients who underwent RA pedicle screw placement had fewer radiation dose than FG group (SMD: -2.2682, 95%CI: -3.1953-1.3411). And four CSs and one RCT reported the number of revision case. The results of CSs suggest that there is no significant difference in the number of revision case between RA and FG group (RR: 0.4087,95% CI 0.1592-1.0495). Our findings are limited by the residual heterogeneity of the included studies, which may limit the interpretation of the results.
    CONCLUSIONS: In TLIF, RA technology exhibits enhanced precision in pedicle screw placement when compared to FG methods. This accuracy contributes to advantages such as the protection of adjacent facet joints and reductions in intraoperative radiation dosage and blood loss. However, the longer preoperative preparation time associated with RA procedures results in comparable surgical duration and radiation time to FG techniques. Presently, FG screw placement remains the predominant approach, with clinical surgeons possessing greater proficiency in its application. Consequently, the integration of RA into TLIF surgery may not be considered the optimal choice.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42023441600.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    二甲双胍已成为解决2型糖尿病(T2DM)作为一线口服抗糖尿病药物的首选药物。肥胖,癌症和骨骼恶化与T2DM有关,这被认为是一种代谢性疾病。许多与T2DM相关的疾病,比如肿瘤,心血管疾病和骨骼退化,可用二甲双胍治疗。椎间盘退变(IVDD)的特点是椎间盘退变,伴随着IVD的髓核(NP)中蛋白聚糖和水的逐渐消耗,导致下背部疼痛。二甲双胍对IVDD的治疗作用也备受关注。通过刺激AMP激活的激酶,二甲双胍可以增强自噬,抑制细胞衰老,凋亡和炎症,从而有效地延迟IVDD。本文旨在系统阐述IVDD的发展及二甲双胍治疗和预防IVDD的作用机制,为临床应用二甲双胍辅助治疗IVDD提供参考。
    Metformin has been the go‑to medical treatment for addressing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as a frontline oral antidiabetic. Obesity, cancer and bone deterioration are linked to T2DM, which is considered a metabolic illness. Numerous diseases associated with T2DM, such as tumours, cardiovascular disease and bone deterioration, may be treated with metformin. Intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) is distinguished by degeneration of the spinal disc, accompanied by the gradual depletion of proteoglycans and water in the nucleus pulposus (NP) of the IVD, resulting in lower back pain. The therapeutic effect of metformin on IVDD has also attracted much attention. By stimulating AMP‑activated kinase, metformin could enhance autophagy and suppress cell senescence, apoptosis and inflammation, thus effectively delaying IVDD. The present review aimed to systematically explain the development of IVDD and mechanism of metformin in the treatment and prevention of IVDD to provide a reference for the clinical application of metformin as adjuvant therapy in the treatment of IVDD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    退行性脊髓型颈椎病(DCM)是成人脊髓功能障碍的主要原因,代表大量发病率和巨大的财政和资源负担。通常,进行性DCM患者最终将接受手术治疗.尽管如此,尽管药物疗法取得了进步,药物治疗的证据仍然有限。来自各个领域的卫生专业人员将对可以使轻度DCM患者受益或增强手术结果的药物感兴趣。这篇综述旨在巩固所有关于DCM药物治疗的临床和实验证据。我们进行了全面的叙述性综述,介绍了已在人类和动物模型中研究用于DCM治疗的所有药物。利鲁唑仅在大鼠模型中表现出有效性,但不能治疗人类的轻度DCM。脑活素在动物中作为脊髓病的潜在神经保护剂出现,但在临床试验中却有矛盾的结果。利马前列素alfadex在动物模型中证明了运动功能的改善,并在一项小型临床试验中表现出了有希望的结果。糖皮质激素不仅不能提供临床益处,而且还可能导致不良事件。西洛他唑,抗Fas配体抗体,和荆树凯利在动物研究中显示出希望,而促红细胞生成素,粒细胞集落刺激因子和利马前列素alfadex在动物和人类研究中都具有潜力。现有证据主要依赖于薄弱的临床数据和动物实验。当前的药理学努力靶向离子通道,干细胞分化,炎症,血管,和凋亡途径。DCM的固有性质和发病机理为开发能够改变疾病进展的神经退行性或神经保护疗法提供了广阔的前景。可能会延迟手术干预,并优化接受手术减压的患者的预后。
    Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the leading cause of spinal cord dysfunction in adults, representing substantial morbidity and significant financial and resource burdens. Typically, patients with progressive DCM will eventually receive surgical treatment. Nonetheless, despite advancements in pharmacotherapeutics, evidence for pharmacological therapy remains limited. Health professionals from various fields would find interest in pharmacological agents that could benefit patients with mild DCM or enhance surgical outcomes. This review aims to consolidate all clinical and experimental evidence on the pharmacological treatment of DCM. We conducted a comprehensive narrative review that presents all pharmacological agents that have been investigated for DCM treatment in both humans and animal models. Riluzole exhibits effectiveness solely in rat models, but not in treating mild DCM in humans. Cerebrolysin emerges as a potential neuroprotective agent for myelopathy in animals but had contradictory results in clinical trials. Limaprost alfadex demonstrates motor function improvement in animal models and exhibits promising outcomes in a small clinical trial. Glucocorticoids not only fail to provide clinical benefits but may also lead to adverse events. Cilostazol, anti-Fas ligand antibody, and Jingshu Keli display promise in animal studies, while erythropoietin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and limaprost alfadex exhibit potential in both animal and human research. Existing evidence mainly rests on weak clinical data and animal experimentation. Current pharmacological efforts target ion channels, stem cell differentiation, inflammatory, vascular, and apoptotic pathways. The inherent nature and pathogenesis of DCM offer substantial prospects for developing neurodegenerative or neuroprotective therapies capable of altering disease progression, potentially delaying surgical intervention, and optimizing outcomes for those undergoing surgical decompression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较皮质骨轨迹(CBT)螺钉与椎弓根螺钉(PS)内固定治疗腰椎融合术后邻近节段退变(ASD)的疗效和安全性。
    方法:本研究在国际前瞻性系统评价注册中心(PROSPERO)(ID:CRD42023484937)注册。我们搜索了PubMed,Embase,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),万方数据库,通过计算机和韦普数据库收集从数据库建立到2023年11月对皮质骨轨迹(CBT)螺钉和椎弓根螺钉(PS)内固定治疗腰椎融合术后相邻节段退变(ASD)疗效和安全性的对照临床研究。两名研究人员筛选了文献,提取数据并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险,记录作者,和样本量,提取术中失血量,操作时间,Oswestry残疾指数(ODI),视觉模拟量表(VAS)圆盘高度(DH),每个研究的住院时间和并发症。采用CochraneLibrary提供的Revman5.4软件进行Meta分析。
    结果:本研究共纳入6项队列研究(CS)和1项随机对照研究,共420名患者,其中CBT组188例,PS组232例。CBT组的术中出血量低于PS组[平均差异(MD)=-129.38,95%CI(-177.22,-81.55),P<0.00001],手术时间短于PS组[MD=-1.42,95%CI(-2.63,-0.20),P=0.02]。CBT组术后早期腰腿痛改善更显著[MD=-0.77,95%CI(-1.35,-0.19),P=0.01;MD=-0.24,95%CI(-0.37,-0.10),P=0.0005]。
    结论:与PS相比,CBT治疗腰椎融合术后邻近节段退变具有术中出血量少,更短的操作时间,术后早期背部和腿部疼痛较少。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw and pedicle screw (PS) internal fixation in the treatment of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after lumbar fusion.
    METHODS: This study was registered on International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (ID: CRD42023484937). We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang Database, and Wei Pu Database by computer to collect controlled clinical studies on the efficacy and safety of cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw and pedicle screw (PS) internal fixation in the treatment of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after lumbar fusion from database establishment to November 2023. Two researchers screened the literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies, recorded the authors, and sample size, and extracted the intraoperative blood loss, operation time, Oswestry disability index (ODI), Visual analogue scale (VAS), disc height (DH), hospital length stay and complications in each study. Meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.4 software provided by Cochrane Library.
    RESULTS: A total of 6 cohort studies (CS) and 1 randomized controlled study with a total of 420 patients were included in this study, including 188 patients in the CBT group and 232 patients in the PS group. The CBT group had lower intraoperative blood loss than the PS group [mean difference (MD) = -129.38, 95% CI (-177.22, -81.55), P < 0.00001] and operation time was shorter than that of the PS group [MD = -1.42, 95% CI (-2.63, -0.20), P = 0.02]. Early postoperative back and leg pain improved more significantly in the CBT group [MD = -0.77, 95% CI (-1.35, -0.19), P = 0.01; MD = -0.24, 95% CI (-0.37, -0.10), P = 0.0005].
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PS, CBT for adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion has the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss, shorter operation time, and less back and leg pain in the early postoperative period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号