OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and harms of initial treatment strategies for stages I-III anal squamous cell cancer (SCC).
METHODS: We searched Medline®, Embase®, and CENTRAL®, between January 1, 2000- March 2024, for randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies of interventions comparing initial treatment strategies. Individual study risk of bias (RoB) and overall strength of evidence (SOE) were evaluated for a prespecified outcome list using standardized methods.
RESULTS: We identified 33 eligible studies and extracted data. Six were deemed low/moderate RoB. Compared with radiotherapy (RT) alone, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with 5-fluorouracil (FU) and mitomycin C (MMC) probably shows a benefit in locoregional failure (LRF), disease-specific (DSS), and colostomy-free survival (CFS) (moderate SOE) yet may result in greater overall and acute hematologic toxicity, with no difference in late harms (low SOE). CRT with 5FU+MMC may show a benefit in LRF, DSS, and CFS rates compared with 5FU alone (low SOE). CRT with 5FU+cisplatin vs 5FU+MMC probably results in no differences in several effectiveness outcomes or overall acute or late harms, and probably increases hematologic toxicity with MMC (moderate SOE). Compared with CRT using capecitabine+MMC, CRT with capecitabine+MMC+paclitaxel may improve OS, DSS, and CFS, yet cause more acute harms (low SOE). Evidence was insufficient for remaining comparisons.
CONCLUSIONS: CRT with 5FU+MMC or 5FU+cisplatin is likely more effective yet incurs greater acute hematologic toxicity than RT alone or single-agent CRT. Adding paclitaxel to capecitabine+MMC may increase treatment efficacy and toxicity. Evidence is insufficient comparing post-treatment surveillance strategies and patient-reported outcomes, highlighting research opportunities.

OBJECTIVE: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common complication following total hip arthroplasty. Various prophylactic treatments have been proposed, including radiotherapy (RT). This review summarizes the evidence from meta-analyses on the efficacy of RT in preventing hip HO.
METHODS: A literature search was conducted on PubMed. The quality of the meta-analyses was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool.
RESULTS: Seven meta-analyses were included. One meta-analysis reported a significant reduction in HO occurrence after RT compared to the control group. Comparing RT and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, one and two meta-analyses showed significantly greater efficacy of RT in preventing severe HO and better outcomes in patients receiving drugs, respectively. Regarding RT settings, the postoperative and preoperative RT were each supported by one meta-analysis. Furthermore, two meta-analyses showed an advantage of multi-fractionated RT over single fraction RT. The overall confidence rate of the meta-analyses was moderate, low, and critically low in one, three, and three meta-analyses, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: RT is a confirmed prophylactic intervention for HO. However, the precise optimization of timing, dosage, and fractionation requires elucidation. Future research should focus on the development of predictive models through large-scale data collection and advanced analytics to refine individualized treatment strategies and assess RT comparative effectiveness with drugs.

Radiotherapy (RT) is a fundamental modality in treatment of cervical cancer. With advancement of technology, conventional RT used for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for over half a century has been rapidly replaced with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) especially during the last decade. This newer technique is able to differentiate the intensity of radiation within the same field, thus reduces the inevitable exposure of radiation to normal organs and enables better dose delivery to tumors. Recently, the American Society for Radiation Oncology has released a guideline for RT in cervical cancer. Although a section of the guideline recommends IMRT for the purpose of toxicity reduction, a thorough review of the literature is necessary to understand the current status of IMRT in cervical cancer. This narrative review updates the recent high-level evidences regarding the efficacy and toxicity of IMRT and provides a better understanding of the most innovative techniques currently available for EBRT enabled by IMRT.

Brain metastases of a chondrosarcoma are extremely rare, and treatment remains controversial. A 54-year-old woman had undergone surgical treatment for a femoral chondrosarcoma and its lung metastases. She presented with visual disturbance and dizziness 22 months after the initial surgery; imaging studies of the brain revealed a metastatic tumor in the left parieto-occipital lobe. Surgical tumor resection was performed; however, only 2 months after gross total resection of the tumor, rapid tumor recurrence was observed. Surgical resection was performed again, followed by intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Three months later, another small brain lesion was detected in the right parietal lobe and was treated with gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery. No recurrence has been reported 20 months after this radiosurgery for brain metastasis. Thus, surgical treatment combined with several adequate radiation therapy sessions may be a viable treatment strategy for brain metastases of chondrosarcomas.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP) with significant radiographic and clinical improvement after a course of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO).
BACKGROUND: RIBP is a rare complication after radiotherapy to the neck and axilla. There are no standard treatment options, with empirical use pharmacotherapy being predominately used, which has had mixed results.HBO is efficacious for the treatment of other severe radiation-induced side effects, however, its benefit in RIBP has conflicting reports.
METHODS: A 45-year-old male, with a 33 pack-year smoking history, presented with a 6-month history of a progressive left neck mass. The final diagnosis was unknown primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. He received intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with 70 Gy prescribed to the gross tumor volume (PTV HR) and 56 Gy to the oropharynx, nasopharynx, and bilateral lymphatics (PTV SR) in 35 daily fractions with three cycles of concurrent cisplatin at 100 mg/m2.Fifteen months following therapy completion, the patient began to endorse symptoms of left brachial plexopathy. Decadron was prescribed for 2 weeks, trental and vitamin E for 6 months, and HBO. The patient returned for follow-up 2 months after completing 30 dives of HBO at 2.4 atmospheres for 2 hours per session. He reported pain resolution and full range of motion of his left arm.
CONCLUSIONS: The best management strategy of RIBP is prevention by reducing total RT doses and close follow-up. However, when RIBP occurs, we recommend treatment with HBO therapy, steroids, trental, and vitamin E as tolerable.

BACKGROUND: Radiation or radiochemotherapy is a common adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been demonstrated to provide better dose conformity, allowing dose escalation and/or reduction of normal tissue exposure compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment (3D-CRT). However, the efficacy of IMRT and 3D-CRT in gastric cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of IMRT with those of 3D-CRT in treating patients with gastric cancer through conducting a meta-analysis of 3-year survival rates [overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)], local control rates, and toxic event rates.
METHODS: Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and clinical trial databases were searched to identify the clinical trials of IMRT versus 3D-CRT for treating patients with gastric cancer. The obtained data of survival and safety were analyzed using the Stata 14.0 software.
RESULTS: A total of 9 controlled clinical studies, including 516 patients with gastric cancer, met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the 3-year OS rate was slightly higher in the IMRT group than in the 3D-CRT group, without any statistical significance. The 3-year local control rate was significantly higher in the IMRT group than in the 3D-CRT group. No significant difference in the 3-year DFS rate was found between the IMRT and 3D-CRT groups. Grade 2-4 toxicities were similar between the IMRT and 3D-CRT groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggested that IMRT might be superior to 3D-CRT in treating patients with gastric cancer in terms of local control rates without increasing toxicity.

OBJECTIVE: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), including its variations (including IMRT, Volumetric Arc Therapy (VMAT), and Tomotherapy), is a widely used and critically important technology for cancer treatment. It is a knowledge-intensive technology due not only to its own technical complexity, but also to the inherently conflicting nature of maximizing tumor control while minimizing normal organ damage. As IMRT experience and especially the carefully designed clinical plan data are accumulated during the past two decades, a new set of methods commonly termed knowledge-based planning (KBP) have been developed that aim to improve the quality and efficiency of IMRT planning by learning from the database of past clinical plans. Some of this development has led to commercial products recently that allowed the investigation of KBP in numerous clinical applications. In this literature review, we will attempt to present a summary of published methods of knowledge-based approaches in IMRT and recent clinical validation results.
METHODS: In March 2018, a literature search was conducted in the NIH Medline database using the PubMed interface to identify publications that describe methods and validations related to KBP in IMRT including variations such as VMAT and Tomotherapy. The search criteria were designed to have a broad scope to capture relevant results with high sensitivity. The authors filtered down the search results according to a predefined selection criteria by reviewing the titles and abstracts first and then by reviewing the full text. A few papers were added to the list based on the references of the reviewed papers. The final set of papers was reviewed and summarized here.
RESULTS: The initial search yielded a total of 740 articles. A careful review of the titles, abstracts, and eventually the full text and then adding relevant articles from reviewing the references resulted in a final list of 73 articles published between 2011 and early 2018. These articles described methods for developing knowledge models for predicting such parameters as dosimetric and dose-volume points, voxel-level doses, and objective function weights that improve or automate IMRT planning for various cancer sites, addressing different clinical and quality assurance needs, and using a variety of machine learning approaches. A number of articles reported carefully designed clinical studies that assessed the performance of KBP models in realistic clinical applications. Overwhelming majority of the studies demonstrated the benefits of KBP in achieving comparable and often improved quality of IMRT planning while reducing planning time and plan quality variation.
CONCLUSIONS: The number of KBP-related studies has been steadily increasing since 2011 indicating a growing interest in applying this approach to clinical applications. Validation studies have generally shown KBP to produce plans with quality comparable to expert planners while reducing the time and efforts to generate plans. However, current studies are mostly retrospective and leverage relatively small datasets. Larger datasets collected through multi-institutional collaboration will enable the development of more advanced models to further improve the performance of KBP in complex clinical cases. Prospective studies will be an important next step toward widespread adoption of this exciting technology.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been considered the most successful development in radiation oncology since the introduction of computed tomography into treatment planning that enabled three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in 1980s. More than three decades have passed since the concept of inverse planning was first introduced in 1982, and IMRT has become the most important and common modality in radiation therapy. This review will present developments in inverse IMRT treatment planning and IMRT delivery using multileaf collimators, along with the associated key concepts. Other relevant issues and future perspectives are also presented.

OBJECTIVE: Local relapse-free survival (LRFS) differs widely among patients with T4 category nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We aimed to build a nomogram incorporating clinicopathological information to predict LRFS in T4 NPC after definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).
UNASSIGNED: Retrospective study of 415 Chinese patients with non-metastatic T4 NPC treated with definitive IMRT with or without chemotherapy at our cancer center between October 2009 and September 2013. The nomogram for LRFS at 3 and 5 years was generated based on multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression, and validated using bootstrap resampling, assessing discriminative performance using the concordance index (C-index) and determining calibration ability via calibration curves.
RESULTS: Five-year LRFS was 88.8%. We identified and incorporated four independent prognostic factors for LRFS: ethmoid sinus invasion, primary gross tumor volume, age, and pretreatment body mass index. The C-index of the nomogram for local recurrence was 0.732 (95% confidence interval, 0.726 to 0.738), indicating excellent predictive accuracy. The calibration curve revealed excellent agreement between nomogram-predicted and observed LRFS probabilities. Risk subgroups based on total point score cutoff values enabled effective discrimination of LRFS.
CONCLUSIONS: This pretreatment nomogram enables clinicians to accurately predict LRFS in T4 NPC after definitive IMRT, and could help to facilitate personalized patient counselling and treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical treatment outcomes and late toxicities of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with those obtained with two-dimensional radiation therapy (2D-RT) or three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
METHODS: We searched all the eligible studies from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline, and Embase. The meta-analysis was performed to compare odds ratio (OR) for overall survival (OS), tumor local control (LC), and late toxicities.
RESULTS: A total of eight studies met the criteria to perform a meta-analysis including 3570 participants, with 1541 patients in the IMRT group and 2029 in the 2D-RT or 3D-CRT group. The IMRT group was associated with a better 5-year overall survival (OR=1.51; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-1.87; p=0.0001), and tumor local control (LC) (OR=1.94; 95% CI 1.53-2.46; p<0.00001). According to CTCAE v3.0 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) and RTOG/EORTC (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer), the incidence of late xerostomia in those who received IMRT was significantly lower than that of the control group (OR=0.18; 95% CI, 0.07-0.46; p=0.0004). In addition, the radiation-induced chronic toxicities rate of trismus and temporal lobe neuropathy (TLN) were also significantly lower in the IMRT group than in the control group (OR=0.18; 95% CI 0.04-0.83; p=0.03; OR=0.44; 95% CI 0.28-0.69; p=0.0003, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that IMRT mayobtain a better antitumor effect, and significantly decrease the incidence of radiation-induced late toxicities in patients with NPC.