Injections

注射
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    牙周炎非手术治疗的金标准是刮削和牙根平整(SRP)。近年来,自体血小板浓缩物的使用已经遍布牙科的许多专业,因此,在牙周治疗中也越来越受欢迎。它的两个主要部分是富血小板血浆(PRP)和富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF),which,自2014年起,也可以通过注射作为可注射的富血小板纤维蛋白(i-PRF)使用。作者根据PRISMA2020指南进行了全面的系统评价。它涉及搜索PubMed,Embase,Scopus,和GoogleScholar数据库使用短语(“根平整”或“牙龈下刮治”或“牙周清创”)和(“富含血小板的血浆”)。根据作者的纳入和排除标准,12个结果包括在审查中,在1170个总结果中。本综述的目的是确定在SRP中使用PRP和i-PRF的影响。结果表明,发现PRP和i-PRF的掺入与牙龈袋深度和临床附着水平的差异显着相关;然而,i-PRF在改善临床参数方面显示出优越性。此外,i-PRF对牙龈卟啉单胞菌表现出明显的杀菌效果。另一方面,PRP在临床参数改善方面被证明不如Nd:YAG激光;但是,它也表现出显著的效率。这篇文献综述使作者得出结论,自体血小板浓缩物可能是改善SRP治疗效果的有效药物。
    The gold standard in the non-surgical treatment of periodontitis is scaling and root planing (SRP). In recent years, the use of autogenous platelet concentrates has spread over many specialties in dentistry and, thus, has also been gaining popularity in periodontal treatment. Its two main fractions are platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), which, since 2014, can also be used via injection as injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF). The authors conducted a comprehensive systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. It involved searching PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases using the phrases (\"Root Planing\" OR \"Subgingival Curettage\" OR \"Periodontal Debridement\") AND (\"Platelet-Rich Plasma\"). Based on the authors\' inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 results were included in the review, out of 1170 total results. The objective of this review was to ascertain the impact of utilizing PRP and i-PRF in SRP. The results revealed that both the incorporation of PRP and i-PRF were found to be significantly associated with are duction in gingival pocket depth and again in clinical attachment level; however, i-PRF demonstrated superiority in improving clinical parameters. Furthermore, i-PRF demonstrated notable bactericidal efficacy against Porphyromonas gingivalis. On the other hand, PRP proved inferior to an Nd:YAG laser in clinical parameter improvement; however, it demonstrated significant efficiency as well. This literature review led the authors to the conclusion that autologous platelet concentrates might be competent agents for improving the therapeutic outcomes of SRP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)是一种常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,以肌肉疼痛为特征,压痛,和触发点。超声检查已成为诊断和治疗MPS的关键工具,因为它能够提供精确的,微创引导。这篇综述讨论了超声检查在各种评估和管理MPS方法中的应用。研究表明,剪切波超声弹性成像可以有效评估肌肉弹性,并提供对MPS患者斜方肌僵硬的见解。超声引导筋膜水分离术,尤其是视觉反馈,已证明在治疗斜方肌MPS方面有效。同样,超声引导下菱形干涉筋膜平面阻滞和后肩MPS的周围膜剥离术显著减轻了疼痛,提高了生活质量。体外冲击波疗法与超声引导的利多卡因注射的组合在减轻斜方肌MPS的疼痛和僵硬方面特别成功。关于各种引导注射的研究,包括干针刺,干涉平面块,筋膜水解剖,强调超声检查对准确性和安全性的重要性。此外,超声引导下将局部麻醉药和类固醇递送至腰方肌显示出持续6个月的疼痛缓解.总的来说,这些发现突出了超声检查在MPS的评估和治疗中的关键作用.
    Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a common musculoskeletal disorder characterized by muscle pain, tenderness, and trigger points. Ultrasonography has emerged as a key tool for diagnosing and treating MPS owing to its ability to provide precise, minimally invasive guidance. This review discusses the use of ultrasonography in various approaches to evaluate and manage MPS. Studies have shown that shear-wave sonoelastography can effectively assess muscle elasticity and offer insights into trapezius stiffness in patients with MPS. Ultrasound-guided interfascial hydrodissection, especially with visual feedback, has demonstrated effectiveness in treating trapezius MPS. Similarly, ultrasound-guided rhomboid interfascial plane blocks and perimysium dissection for posterior shoulder MPS have significantly reduced pain and improved quality of life. The combination of extracorporeal shockwave therapy with ultrasound-guided lidocaine injections has been particularly successful in reducing pain and stiffness in trapezius MPS. Research regarding various guided injections, including dry needling, interfascial plane blocks, and fascial hydrodissection, emphasizes the importance of ultrasonography for accuracy and safety. Additionally, ultrasound-guided delivery of local anesthetics and steroids to the quadratus lumborum muscle has shown lasting pain relief over a 6-month period. Overall, these findings highlight the pivotal role of ultrasonography in the assessment and treatment of MPS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腰椎间盘突出症(HLDs)引起的下腰痛和坐骨神经痛是就诊于疼痛诊所的患者常见的主诉。在各种治疗方法中,盘内臭氧注射已成为HLDs的有效替代或额外治疗选择。
    这项荟萃分析旨在研究椎间盘内注射臭氧治疗HLDs的有效性。
    我们搜索了PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,以及截至2024年1月25日发表的相关研究的Scopus数据库。我们纳入了研究盘内臭氧注射对HLDs患者的疗效的研究。我们使用Cochrane协作工具评估了各个研究的方法学质量。
    治疗后6个月,对患有HLDs的患者进行盘内臭氧注射的治疗效果大于类固醇注射的治疗效果(治疗成功率,6个月:比值比=3.95,95%置信区间[CI][2.44,6.39],P<0.01)或常规药物(视觉模拟量表[VAS]的变化,6个月:标准化平均差[SMD]=1.65,95%CI[1.08,2.22],P<0.01;12个月:SMD=1.52,95%CI[0.96,2.08],P<0.01),但与显微椎间盘切除术相似(VAS的变化,18个月:SMD=-0.05,95%CI[-0.67,0.57],P=0.87)。治疗后<6个月,盘内臭氧注射后VAS评分的降低高于类固醇注射后(VAS的变化,1个月:SMD=2.53,95%CI[1.84,3.21],P<0.01)。
    盘内臭氧注射可能是HLDs患者的有用治疗工具。与类固醇注射和口服药物等其他常规治疗方法相比,盘内臭氧注射有很大的长期(6个月)的有效性。
    UNASSIGNED: Low back pain and sciatica caused by herniated lumbar discs (HLDs) are common complaints among patients visiting pain clinics. Among the various therapeutic methods, intradiscal ozone injections have emerged as an effective alternative or additional treatment option for HLDs.
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness of intradiscal ozone injections in the treatment of HLDs.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases for relevant studies published until January 25, 2024. We included studies that investigated the efficacy of intradiscal ozone injections in patients with HLDs. We evaluated the methodological quality of individual studies using the Cochrane Collaboration tool.
    UNASSIGNED: At ⩾ 6 months after treatment, the therapeutic effect of intradiscal ozone injections in patients with HLDs was greater than that of steroid injections (treatment success rate, 6 months: odds ratio = 3.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] [2.44, 6.39], P< 0.01) or conventional medications (changes in the Visual Analog Scale [VAS], 6 months: standardized mean difference [SMD] = 1.65, 95% CI [1.08, 2.22], P< 0.01; 12 months: SMD = 1.52, 95% CI [0.96, 2.08], P< 0.01) but similar to that of microdiscectomy (changes in VAS, 18 months: SMD =-0.05, 95% CI [-0.67, 0.57], P= 0.87). At < 6 months after treatment, the reduction in the VAS score after intradiscal ozone injections was higher than that after steroid injections (changes in VAS, 1 month: SMD = 2.53, 95% CI [1.84, 3.21], P< 0.01).
    UNASSIGNED: Intradiscal ozone injections may be a useful therapeutic tool in patients with HLDs. Compared with other conventional treatment methods such as steroid injections and oral medications, intradiscal ozone injection has great long-term (⩾ 6 months) effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:糖尿病肾病(DN),作为糖尿病的常见并发症之一,以持续的蛋白尿为特征,肾小球滤过率下降,动脉血压升高.目前,血必净注射液广泛应用于DN的治疗。然而,很少发表关于血必净注射液干预DN的系统评价和荟萃分析.为了更系统、客观地评价血必净注射液干预DN的临床疗效,我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析来验证.
    目的:系统评价血必净注射液联合前列地尔治疗糖尿病肾病的临床疗效。
    方法:我们搜索了中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),中国生物医学数据库(SinoMed),维普数据库(VIP),万方数据库,PubMed,科克伦图书馆,Embase,WebofScience和其他计算机数据库,检索自数据库建立至2022年的国内外血必净注射液联合前列地尔治疗DN的随机对照试验。主要结局指标包括血糖、次要结局指标包括血脂,肾功能,尿蛋白,和安全。两名评估人员独立筛选了文献,提取数据并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。采用RevMan5.3软件进行数据分析。
    结果:共纳入14项随机对照试验,包括1233例,治疗组618例,对照组615例。荟萃分析结果表明,与对照组相比,治疗组能有效降低空腹血糖[均差[MD]=-1.90,95%CI(-2.40,-1.40),P<.00001],糖化血红蛋白A1c[MD=-2.38,95%CI(-2.51,-2.25),P<.00001],餐后2h血糖[MD=-2.92,95%CI(-3.95,-1.89),P<.00001],三酰甘油[MD=-1.08,95%CI(-1.66,-0.50),P=.0003],总胆固醇[MD=-1.17,95%CI(-1.39,-0.95),P<.00001],低密度脂蛋白胆固醇[MD=-1.19,95%CI(-1.60,-0.78),P<.00001],高密度脂蛋白胆固醇[MD=0.32,95%CI(0.23,0.42),P<.00001],血清肌酐[MD=-42.95,95%CI(-57.46,-28.43),P<.00001],血尿素氮[MD=-2.24,95CI(-2.62,-1.86),P<.00001],血β2微球蛋白[SMD=-1.49,95%CI(-1.70,-1.28),P<.00001],尿β2微球蛋白[SMD=-0.81,95%CI(-1.04,-0.58),P<.00001],24小时尿蛋白定量[MD=-0.20,95%CI(-0.26,-0.14),P<.00001],尿白蛋白排泄率[SMD=-1.15,95%CI(-1.38,-0.93),P<.00001].
    结论:血必净注射液联合前列地尔治疗DN较常规西药治疗更具优势。
    BACKGROUND: Diabetes nephropathy (DN), as one of the common complications of diabetes, is characterized by persistent albuminuria, decreased glomerular filtration rate, and elevated arterial blood pressure. At present, Xuebijing injection is widely used in the treatment of DN. However, few systematic reviews and meta-analysis related to Xuebijing injection intervention in DN were published. In order to more systematically and objectively evaluate the clinical efficacy of Xuebijing injection intervention in DN, we conducted systematic reviews and meta-analysis to verify it.
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the research was to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of Xuebijing injection combined with alprostadil in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy.
    METHODS: We searched the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biomedical Database (SinoMed), Weipu Database (VIP), Wanfang Database, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science and other databases by computer, and searched the randomized controlled trials of Xuebijing injection combined with alprostadil in the treatment of DN at home and abroad from the establishment of the database to 2022. The main outcome indicators included blood glucose, and the secondary outcome indicators included blood lipid, renal function, urinary protein, and safety. Two evaluators independently screened the literature, extracted the data and evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies. RevMan 5.3 software was used to analyze the data.
    RESULTS: A total of 14 randomized controlled trials were included, including 1233 cases, 618 cases in the treatment group and 615 cases in the control group. The results of meta-analysis demonstrated that compared with the control group, the treatment group could effectively reduce fasting plasma glucose [mean difference [MD] = -1.90, 95% CI (-2.40, -1.40), P < .00001], glycosylated hemoglobin A1c [MD = -2.38, 95% CI (-2.51, -2.25), P < .00001], 2h postprandial blood glucose [MD = -2.92, 95% CI (-3.95, -1.89), P < .00001], triacylglycerol [MD = -1.08, 95% CI (-1.66, -0.50), P = .0003], total cholesterol [MD = -1.17, 95% CI (-1.39, -0.95), P < .00001], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [MD = -1.19, 95% CI (-1.60, -0.78), P < .00001], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [MD = 0.32, 95% CI (0.23, 0.42), P < .00001], serum creatinine [MD = -42.95, 95% CI (-57.46, -28.43), P < .00001], blood urea nitrogen [MD = -2.24, 95%CI (-2.62,-1.86), P < .00001], blood β2 microglobulin [SMD = -1.49, 95% CI (-1.70, -1.28), P < .00001], urine β2 microglobulin [SMD = -0.81, 95% CI (-1.04, -0.58), P < .00001], 24-hour urinary protein quantification [MD = -0.20, 95% CI (-0.26, -0.14), P < .00001], urinary albumin excretion rate [SMD = -1.15, 95% CI (-1.38, -0.93), P < .00001].
    CONCLUSIONS: Xuebijing injection combined with alprostadil has more advantages in treating DN compared to routine Western medicine.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一种慢性呼吸系统疾病,患病率高,发病率,和死亡率。喘可治(CKZ)注射液,一种中成药,已普遍用于治疗COPD。本研究通过整合荟萃分析和网络药理学,评估CKZ注射液在COPD患者中的临床疗效,并探索潜在的潜在机制。
    随机对照试验(RCT)由WebofScience在数据库中进行搜索,Cochrane图书馆和PubMed自2022年11月起用于文献收集,并使用ReviewManager5.4分析数据。通过网络药理学方法,化学成分和它们的目标,以及疾病目标进行了进一步分析。
    共纳入15个RCTs,包括1212例患者。Meta分析结果显示,CKZ注射液可显著提高临床有效率(RR=1.25,95%CI:1.14~1.36),临床优势在于它可以显着降低急性加重率(RR=0.29,95%CI:0.12至0.70)和COPD评估测试(CAT)评分(MD=-4.62,95%CI:-8.966至-0.28)。从在线数据库中获得了总共31种化合物和178种潜在的CKZ注射液靶标。分子对接表明,大多数关键组分和靶标可以形成稳定的结构。
    这项系统的荟萃分析和网络药理学综述表明,CKZ可以有效提高COPD治疗的临床疗效和安全性。这种功效可能与CKZ通过多种成分的抗炎作用和免疫调节有关。多个目标和多个途径。
    UNASSIGNED: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic respiratory disease with high prevalence, morbidity, and mortality. Chuankezhi (CKZ) injection, a Chinese patent medicine, has been commonly used for treating COPD. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy of CKZ injections in COPD patients and explored potential underlying mechanisms by integrating meta-analysis and network pharmacology.
    UNASSIGNED: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were search in database by Web of Science, Cochrane Library and PubMed as of November 2022 for literature collection, and the Review Manager 5.4 was used to analyze the data. Through the network pharmacology method, the chemical components and their targets, as well as the disease targets were further analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 15 RCTs including 1212 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that CKZ injection can significantly improve the clinical effective rate (RR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.36), and the clinical advantage was that it can significantly reduced acute exacerbation rate (RR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.70) and COPD assessment test (CAT) scores (MD =-4.62, 95% CI:-8.966 to-0.28). A total of 31 chemical compounds and 178 potential targets for CKZ injection were obtained from the online databases. Molecular docking revealed that most key components and targets could form stable structure.
    UNASSIGNED: This systematic review with meta-analysis and network pharmacology demonstrates that CKZ could effectively improve the clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of COPD. Such efficacy may be related to an anti-inflammatory effect and immunoregulation of CKZ via multiple components, multiple targets and multiple pathways.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目前,研究患者对急性风湿热(ARF)和风湿性心脏病(RHD)预防性治疗的偏好的文献有限.鉴于澳大利亚的这种治疗完成率较低,疾病负担主要影响原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民,改善结局需要对驱动患者偏好的因素有更深入的了解.由于现有文献有限,本综述旨在探讨研究结果可能适用于ARF/RHD患者的治疗偏好.
    目的:探索患者的治疗偏好,父母/护理人员和医疗保健提供者在儿科和青少年人群中定期注射治疗任何慢性疾病。研究结果将应用于开发苄星青霉素G(BPG)预防方案,这些方案由患者及其护理人员的治疗偏好决定。这反过来将有助于优化成功的BPG递送。
    方法:对数据库的系统评价(Medline,Embase和GlobalHealth)是使用在专家图书馆员的输入下开发的搜索策略进行的。使用两个阶段的过程选择研究:(1)标题和摘要屏幕和(2)全文回顾。使用审阅者开发的模板提取数据,并使用JBI关键评估工具进行评估。数据是根据专题分析框架进行综合的。
    结果:通过数据库搜索确定了1725篇论文,在2022年2月12日至2022年4月8日期间进行,其中25项纳入审查。逐行编码搜索概念产生20个描述性主题。从这些,归纳得出五个总体分析主题:(1)易用性,(2)注射的耐受性,(3)对日常生活的影响,(4)患者/护理人员机构和(5)家庭/医疗保健接口。
    结论:本综述的结果可用于为儿科和青少年患者队列开发偏好主导的常规注射方案,特别是在ARF/RHD二级预防中BPG给药。
    背景:患者,家长和卫生人员对儿科和青少年人群定期注射方案的偏好-系统评价方案。PROSPERO2021CRD42021284375。可从以下网址获得:https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021284375。
    BACKGROUND: At present, limited literature exists exploring patient preferences for prophylactic treatment of acute rheumatic fever (ARF) and rheumatic heart disease (RHD). Given low treatment completion rates to this treatment in Australia, where the burden of disease predominantly affects Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, an improved understanding of factors driving patient preference is required to improve outcomes. Due to limited available literature, this review sought to explore treatment preferences for conditions for which the findings might be generalisable to the ARF/RHD context.
    OBJECTIVE: Explore treatment preferences of patients, parents/caregivers and healthcare providers towards regular injection regimens in paediatric and adolescent populations for any chronic condition. Findings will be applied to the development of benzathine penicillin G (BPG) prophylactic regimens that are informed by treatment preferences of patients and their caregivers. This in turn should contribute to optimisation of successful BPG delivery.
    METHODS: A systematic review of databases (Medline, Embase and Global Health) was conducted using a search strategy developed with expert librarian input. Studies were selected using a two-stage process: (1) title and abstract screen and (2) full text review. Data were extracted using a reviewer-developed template and appraised using the JBI Critical Appraisal tool. Data were synthesised according to a thematic analytical framework.
    RESULTS: 1725 papers were identified by the database search, conducted between 12 February 2022 and 8 April 2022, and 25 were included in the review. Line-by-line coding to search for concepts generated 20 descriptive themes. From these, five overarching analytical themes were derived inductively: (1) ease of use, (2) tolerability of injection, (3) impact on daily life, (4) patient/caregiver agency and (5) home/healthcare interface.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review may be used to inform the development of preference-led regular injection regimens for paediatric and adolescent patient cohorts-specifically for BPG administration in ARF/RHD secondary prophylaxis.
    BACKGROUND: Patient, parent and health personnel preferences towards regular injection regimes in paediatric and adolescent populations-a protocol for a systematic review. PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021284375. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021284375.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    各种注射剂可用于治疗腕管综合征。进行了系统评价和网络荟萃分析,以研究不同注射疗法缓解腕管综合征症状的有效性。从开始到2023年5月10日,都在各种数据库中搜索相关研究。使用患者(P)确定合格的研究,干预(I),比较(C),和结果(O)模型,涉及(P)腕管综合征的参与者,(I)基于注射疗法的干预措施,(C)使用安慰剂或另一种注射剂作为对照治疗,和(O)感兴趣的临床和电诊断结果的测量。共有18项研究纳入分析。网络荟萃分析显示,富血小板血浆在短期和长期症状和疼痛缓解以及功能改善方面均可有效治疗腕管综合征,而类固醇仅在短期内有效。此外,注射葡萄糖溶液可以提供长期疼痛缓解以及短期和长期症状缓解和功能改善。研究结果表明,富血小板血浆应作为腕管综合征的一线治疗方法,葡萄糖和类固醇作为替代治疗选择。
    Various injectants are available for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. This systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of different injection therapies in alleviating the symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Various databases were searched for relevant studies from inception until May 10, 2023. Eligible studies were identified using the patient (P), intervention (I), comparison (C), and outcomes (O) model, which involved (P) participants with carpal tunnel syndrome, (I) an intervention based on injection therapy, (C) the use of placebo or another injectant as a control treatment, and (O) the measurement of clinical and electrodiagnostic outcomes of interest. A total of 18 studies were included in the analysis. The network meta-analysis revealed that platelet-rich plasma is effective in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome in terms of symptom and pain relief and functional improvement in both the short and long term, whereas steroids are effective only in the short term. Additionally, injections of dextrose solution may offer long-term pain relief as well as short- and long-term symptom alleviation and functional improvement. The study findings suggest that platelet-rich plasma should be used as the first-line treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, with dextrose and steroids serving as alternative treatment options.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    可注射透明质酸(HA)水凝胶已在面部美学中普及,因为它们提供了持久的效果,并发症风险低,在施用之前不需要变应原性测试,并且可以通过透明质酸酶的作用容易地去除。另一方面,这些系统的开发需要对水凝胶形成中涉及的化学机理进行深入研究。理想的真皮填充剂在通过针头挤出期间应暂时流化,并在施用后迅速恢复其原始形状。具有更多弹性特性的水凝胶,例如,很难注射,而粘性材料太液体。应该实现两种性质之间的平衡。面部的每个区域需要具有不同流变特性的产品。高G\'真皮填充物对于较深的皱纹是优选的,而具有较低G\'值的对应物更多地显示在浅表皱纹或嘴唇增大中。HA的分子量和浓度等因素,pH值,交联剂的类型和浓度,颗粒大小,应调节交联反应时间和交联剂/多糖比例以实现特定的流变性质。在这次审查中,详细讨论了各变量的影响,以指导合理开发新型真皮填充剂。
    Injectable hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogels have been popularized in facial aesthetics as they provide a long-lasting effect, low risk of complications, allergenicity tests are not required before application and can be easily removed by the action of hyaluronidases. On the other hand, the development of these systems requires in-depth studies of chemical mechanisms involved in hydrogel formation. Ideal dermal fillers should temporarily fluidize during extrusion through the needle and quickly recover their original shape after application. Hydrogels with more elastic properties, for example, are difficult to inject while viscous materials are too liquid. A balance between both properties should be achieved. Each region of the face requires products with distinct rheological properties. High G\' dermal fillers are preferable for deeper wrinkles whereas the counterpart with lower values of G\' is more indicated in superficial wrinkles or lip augmentation. Factors such as molecular weight and concentration of HA, pH, type and concentration of the crosslinking agent, particle size, crosslinking reaction time and crosslinking agent/polysaccharide ratio should be modulated to achieve specific rheological properties. In this review, the effect of each variable is discussed in detail to guide the rational development of new dermal fillers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肾康注射液(SKI)在中国已广泛用于肾脏疾病的治疗多年。本系统评价的目的是评估肾康注射液治疗急性肾损伤(AKI)的疗效。
    在七个数据库中进行了搜索,包含从每个数据库开始到10月8日的数据,2023年。提取比较SKI治疗的AKI患者与对照受试者的随机对照试验。主要结局指标为血清肌酐(SCr)水平。次要结果包括血尿素氮(BUN),血清胱抑素C(CysC),24小时尿蛋白(24h-Upro)水平,APACHEⅡ评分及不良反应。
    这项荟萃分析包括11项研究,分析表明,与对照组相比,SKI显着降低SCr[WMD=-23.31,95%CI(-28.06,-18.57);p<0.001];BUN[WMD=-2.07,95%CI(-2.56,-1.57);p<0.001];CysC[WMD=-0.55,95%CI(-0.78,-0.32),p<0.001];24小时尿蛋白[WMD=-0.43,95%CI(-0.53,-0.34),p<0.001];APACHEII评分[WMD=-3.07,95%CI(-3.67,-2.48),p<0.001]。SKI组与对照组的不良反应差异无统计学意义[RR=1.32,95%CI(0.66,2.63),p=0.431]。
    在AKI患者中使用SKI可能会降低SCr,BUN,CysC,24小时Upro水平,AKI患者的APACHEII评分。不良反应发生率与对照组无差异。将来还需要进行更严格的临床试验,以彻底评估和确定SKI治疗AKI的有效性。
    UNASSIGNED: Shenkang injection (SKI) has been widely used in China for many years for the treatment of kidney disease. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of Shenkang injection for the treatment of acute kidney injury (AKI).
    UNASSIGNED: A search was conducted across seven databases, encompassing data from the inception of each database through October 8th, 2023. Randomized controlled trials comparing SKI-treated AKI patients with control subjects were extracted. The main outcome measure was serum creatinine (SCr) levels. Secondary outcomes included blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum cystatin C (CysC), 24-h urine protein (24 h-Upro) levels, APACHE II score and adverse reactions.
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis included eleven studies, and the analysis indicated that, compared with the control group, SKI significantly decreased SCr [WMD = -23.31, 95% CI (-28.06, -18.57); p < 0.001]; BUN [WMD = -2.07, 95% CI (-2.56, -1.57); p < 0.001]; CysC [WMD = -0.55, 95% CI (-0.78, -0.32), p < 0.001]; 24-h urine protein [WMD = -0.43, 95% CI (-0.53, -0.34), p < 0.001]; and the APACHE II score [WMD = -3.07, 95% CI (-3.67, -2.48), p < 0.001]. There was no difference in adverse reactions between the SKI group and the control group [RR = 1.32, 95% CI (0.66, 2.63), p = 0.431].
    UNASSIGNED: The use of SKI in AKI patients may reduce SCr, BUN, CysC, 24-h Upro levels, and APACHE II scores in AKI patients. The incidence of adverse reactions did not differ from that in the control group. Additional rigorous clinical trials will be necessary in the future to thoroughly evaluate and establish the effectiveness of SKI in the treatment of AKI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:DeQuervain的腱鞘炎引起疼痛和拇指功能受损。保守治疗包括皮质类固醇注射和固定,目前尚不清楚哪种方法具有更大的疗效。以前的综述受到纳入研究数量少的限制;因此需要更新的综述和荟萃分析。
    方法:对PubMed的系统评价,Embase,并进行了WebofScience数据库。包括比较皮质类固醇注射与固定的随机对照试验。两位作者筛选了文章,提取的数据,并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,用95%置信区间计算合并相对风险和平均差.
    结果:纳入了16项研究,包括1,206例患者。皮质类固醇注射显示出比固定更大的治疗成功率(相对风险:1.61;95%置信区间:1.21-2.15)。联合治疗显示出比固定(相对风险:2.15;95%置信区间:1.77-2.62)或单独注射(相对风险:1.23;95%置信区间:1.12-1.34)更大的疗效。注射的疼痛和残疾评分低于固定,联合治疗的疼痛和残疾评分低于单独治疗。
    结论:皮质类固醇注射比固定治疗DeQuervain的腱鞘炎更有效,和结合两种治疗提供了额外的好处。我们建议在一线治疗中注射皮质类固醇,并将固定作为辅助治疗。关于最佳皮质类固醇和局部麻醉剂制剂需要进一步研究。
    OBJECTIVE: De Quervain\'s tenosynovitis causes pain and impairment of thumb function. Conservative treatments comprise corticosteroid injection and immobilization, and it is unclear which offers greater efficacy. Previous reviews were limited by the small number of included studies; thus an updated review and meta-analysis is warranted.
    METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted. Randomized control trials comparing corticosteroid injection to immobilization were included. Two authors screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analyses using the random-effects model were conducted, calculating pooled relative risks and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals.
    RESULTS: 16 studies comprising 1206 patients were included. Corticosteroid injection showed greater treatment success than immobilization (relative risk: 1.61; 95% confidence interval: 1.21-2.15). Combining treatments demonstrated greater efficacy than immobilization (relative risk: 2.15; 95% confidence interval: 1.77-2.62) or injection alone (relative risk: 1.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.12-1.34). Pain and disability scores were lower with injection than immobilization and with combined treatment than with either alone.
    CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroid injection is more effective than immobilization for De Quervain\'s tenosynovitis, and combining the two treatments provides additional benefit. We recommend corticosteroid injection in first line treatment and immobilization as adjuvant therapy. Further research is required regarding optimal corticosteroid and local anesthetic formulations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号