Individuality

个性
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然味道和嗅觉感知已经被彻底调查,我们对口腔体感知觉的理解仍然有限。Further,评估和测量口腔体感感知的个体差异提出了显著的挑战。这篇综述旨在通过检查和比较每种方法的优缺点来评估现有的评估口腔体感感知的方法。审查强调了缺乏标准化的评估方法以及每种方法中的各种程序。触觉敏感性可以用几种方法来评估,但是每种方法测量不同的触觉维度。需要进一步的研究来确认其与纹理敏感性的相关性。此外,测量单个纹理属性可能无法提供纹理灵敏度的总体表示。可以使用热变化检测或温度辨别测试来评估热灵敏度。化学敏感性测试涉及局部或全口刺激测试。评估口腔体感敏感性的适当方法的选择取决于几个因素,包括具体的研究目标和目标人群。每种方法都有其独特的预期目的,优势,和限制,所以没有普遍优越的方法存在。为了克服与某些方法相关的一些限制,审查提供了可以考虑的替代或补充方法。研究人员可以通过仔细选择和潜在的组合方法来增强对口腔体感敏感性的综合评估。此外,每种方法都需要标准化的方案.
    While taste and smell perception have been thoroughly investigated, our understanding of oral somatosensory perception remains limited. Further, assessing and measuring individual differences in oral somatosensory perception pose notable challenges. This review aimed to evaluate the existing methods to assess oral somatosensory perception by examining and comparing the strengths and limitations of each method. The review highlighted the lack of standardized assessment methods and the various procedures within each method. Tactile sensitivity can be assessed using several methods, but each method measures different tactile dimensions. Further investigations are needed to confirm its correlation with texture sensitivity. In addition, measuring a single textural attribute may not provide an overall representation of texture sensitivity. Thermal sensitivity can be evaluated using thermal-change detection or temperature discrimination tests. The chemesthetic sensitivity tests involve either localized or whole-mouth stimulation tests. The choice of an appropriate method for assessing oral somatosensory sensitivity depends on several factors, including the specific research objectives and the target population. Each method has its unique intended purpose, strengths, and limitations, so no universally superior approach exists. To overcome some of the limitations associated with certain methods, the review offers alternative or complementary approaches that could be considered. Researchers can enhance the comprehensive assessment of oral somatosensory sensitivity by carefully selecting and potentially combining methods. In addition, a standardized protocol remains necessary for each method.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇综述综合了与情绪调节(ER)相关的神经过程中的个体差异。它包括自我报告和生理调节成功的个体差异,自我报告的ER相关性状,和人口统计学变量,评估它们与ER任务期间大脑激活的相关性。考虑到感兴趣区域(ROI)和全脑分析,该综述纳入了52项功能磁共振成像研究的数据.结果可以总结如下:(1)自我报告的调节成功(通过调节后的情绪状态评分进行评估)和自我报告的ER相关特征(通过问卷调查进行评估)与外侧前额叶皮层的大脑活动相关。(2)杏仁核激活仅在ROI分析中与ER相关性状相关,虽然它与全脑分析中的调节成功有关。(3)对于人口统计和生理测量,各研究报告的效应没有系统性重叠.在显示调节成功和ER相关特征的个体差异可以追溯到与情绪反应性(杏仁核)和认知控制(外侧前额叶皮层)相关的大脑区域的神经活动差异,我们的发现可以为前瞻性个性化干预模型提供信息.
    This review synthesises individual differences in neural processes related to emotion regulation (ER). It comprises individual differences in self-reported and physiological regulation success, self-reported ER-related traits, and demographic variables, to assess their correlation with brain activation during ER tasks. Considering region-of-interest (ROI) and whole-brain analyses, the review incorporated data from 52 functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Results can be summarized as follows: (1) Self-reported regulation success (assessed by emotional state ratings after regulation) and self-reported ER-related traits (assessed by questionnaires) correlated with brain activity in the lateral prefrontal cortex. (2) Amygdala activation correlated with ER-related traits only in ROI analyses, while it was associated with regulation success in whole-brain analyses. (3) For demographic and physiological measures, there was no systematic overlap in effects reported across studies. In showing that individual differences in regulation success and ER-related traits can be traced back to differences in the neural activity of brain regions associated with emotional reactivity (amygdala) and cognitive control (lateral prefrontal cortex), our findings can inform prospective personalised intervention models.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: Motivation to change has been suggested to significantly impact treatment outcomes in eating disorders (EDs). This review will investigate factors associated with motivation to change in EDs with the aim of supporting clinicians to be aware and sensitive to factors that might obstruct recovery and to inform motivation-based interventions.
    METHODS: Using PRISMA guidelines, this article identified 24 studies through database searches meeting eligibility criteria. Only correlates of motivation were identified, limiting the ability of this review to identify causal relationships. Factors that changed alongside changes in motivation were identified from longitudinal studies.
    RESULTS: This review identified factors such as individual characteristics, co-morbid psychopathology, lack of treatment autonomy and relationships with others to be associated with motivation to change in individuals with EDs. In addition, motivation to change significantly increased alongside self-esteem and identity re-negotiation when measured longitudinally.
    CONCLUSIONS: Motivational interviewing can typically focus on exploring ambivalence to treatment, identifying goals and values, and increasing self-efficacy. However, this review identifies individual and relational factors to be particularly significant and may obstruct recovery from an ED. As such, evidence-based targets have been identified to inform clinicians and motivation-based interventions.
    UNASSIGNED: Knowledge of factors associated with motivation to change in EDs is important to understand those who may have poorer treatment outcomes. Motivation may be improved by supporting individuals\' relationship with others and tailoring interventions according to temperament and personality traits. Utilizing an individual\'s social support as they enter ED treatment may be effective in maximizing motivation to recover.
    OBJECTIVE: Se ha sugerido que la motivación al cambio impacta significativamente en los resultados del tratamiento en los trastornos de la conducta alimentaria (TCAs). Esta revisión investigará los factores asociados con la motivación al cambio en los TCAs con el objetivo de apoyar a los clínicos para que estén conscientes y sensibles a los factores que podrían obstaculizar la recuperación e informar las intervenciones basadas en la motivación. MÉTODO: Siguiendo las guías PRISMA, este artículo identificó 24 estudios a través de búsquedas en bases de datos que cumplían con los criterios de elegibilidad. Solo se identificaron correlatos de la motivación, lo que limita la capacidad de esta revisión para identificar relaciones causales. Los factores que cambiaron junto con los cambios en la motivación se identificaron a partir de estudios longitudinales.
    RESULTS: Esta revisión identificó factores como características individuales, psicopatología comórbida, falta de autonomía en el tratamiento y relaciones con otros como asociados con la motivación al cambio en individuos con TCAs. Además, la motivación al cambio aumentó significativamente junto con la autoestima y la renegociación de la identidad cuando se midió longitudinalmente. DISCUSIÓN: La entrevista motivacional típicamente puede centrarse en explorar la ambivalencia hacia el tratamiento, identificando metas y valores, y aumentando la autoeficacia. Sin embargo, esta revisión identifica factores individuales y relacionales como particularmente significativos y que pueden obstaculizar la recuperación de un TCA. Como tal, se han identificado objetivos basados en evidencia para informar a los clínicos y a las intervenciones basadas en la motivación.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在比较中等强度和高强度有氧运动对老年人心肺功能(CRF)的影响。考虑到完成的运动量。
    方法:数据库MEDLINE(Ovid),EMBASE(Ovid),和CENTRAL(CochraneLibrary)进行检索以确定随机对照试验(RCTs).两名评审员提取数据并评估偏倚。综合荟萃分析软件计算的总体效应大小,强度差异,并使用干预前后或峰值摄氧量(V²O2峰值)的变化评分进行荟萃回归分析。该综述包括23项RCT,其中1332例老年人(干预组:932例;对照组:400例),分为中等强度(435名老年人)和高强度(476名老年人)组。
    结果:Meta回归分析显示,但并不重要,运动强度与计算完成运动量后V炭黑峰值改善之间的关系(β=0.31,95%CI=[-0.04;0.67])。此外,比较中等强度和高强度的研究显示,但并不重要,有利于高强度的效果(对冲=0.20,95%CI=[-0.02;0.41])。最后,在使用各种方法的运动组之间,V²O2峰值改善没有显着差异,模态,和强度监测策略。
    结论:研究结果挑战了高强度运动本质上优越的观念,并表明有规律的有氧运动,无论具体方法和强度如何,为老年人提供CRF的主要好处。未来的随机对照试验应优先考虑监测和报告老年人运动量和依从性的有效和可靠的方法。
    OBJECTIVE: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effect of moderate- versus high-intensity aerobic exercise on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in older adults, taking into account the volume of exercise completed.
    METHODS: The databases MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), and CENTRAL (Cochrane Library) were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two reviewers extracted data and assessed bias. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software calculated overall effect size, intensity differences, and performed meta-regression analyses using pre-to-post intervention or change scores of peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2 peak). The review included 23 RCTs with 1332 older adults (intervention group: n = 932; control group: n = 400), divided into moderate-intensity (435 older adults) and high-intensity (476 older adults) groups.
    RESULTS: Meta-regression analysis showed a moderate, but not significant, relationship between exercise intensity and improvements in V̇O2 peak after accounting for the completed exercise volume (β = 0.31, 95% CI = [-0.04; 0.67]). Additionally, studies comparing moderate- versus high-intensity revealed a small, but not significant, effect in favor of high-intensity (Hedges\' g = 0.20, 95% CI = [-0.02; 0.41]). Finally, no significant differences in V̇O2 peak improvements were found across exercise groups employing various methods, modalities, and intensity monitoring strategies.
    CONCLUSIONS: Findings challenge the notion that high-intensity exercise is inherently superior and indicate that regular aerobic exercise, irrespective of the specific approach and intensity, provides the primary benefits to CRF in older adults. Future RCTs should prioritize valid and reliable methodologies for monitoring and reporting exercise volume and adherence among older adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在美国,使用社交媒体获取健康信息非常普遍。不幸的是,这种使用可能会使用户暴露于错误信息。错误信息的普遍性和危害在许多健康领域都有很好的记录(例如,传染病)。然而,关于心理健康错误信息的研究是有限的。我们的审查表明,心理健康错误信息很常见,尽管其患病率因疾病和治疗类型而异。通常,对于健康错误信息,记录了对错误信息易感性的个体差异,但对于心理健康而言,差异较小。我们讨论了定义心理健康错误信息与其他分类的概念问题,例如个人经验的过度概括。尽管有明确的证据证明虚假和积极误导的内容,未来的研究还应探讨负面医疗经验和健康差异对社交媒体上心理健康错误信息的作用。
    Social media use for health information is extremely common in the United States. Unfortunately, this use may expose users to misinformation. The prevalence and harms of misinformation are well documented in many health domains (e.g., infectious diseases). However, research on mental health misinformation is limited. Our review suggests that mental health misinformation is common, although its prevalence varies across disorders and treatment types. Individual differences in susceptibility to misinformation have been documented for health misinformation generally but less so for mental health specifically. We discuss conceptual issues in defining mental health misinformation versus other classifications such as overgeneralizations from personal experience. Although there is clear evidence for false and actively misleading content, future research should also explore the role of negative healthcare experiences and health disparities on mental health misinformation on social media.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    心理理论(ToM),理解和推理精神状态的能力,已经在幼儿和临床人群中进行了广泛的研究。在过去的二十年中,人们对成年人的ToM检查越来越感兴趣,但是现有措施在多大程度上适合研究成年人,特别是在检测个体差异时,仍未研究。在对273项研究的系统回顾中,确定了75种用于调查成人寿命的个体差异的措施。他们对个体差异的敏感性,可靠性,和有效性进行了检查。结果表明,天花板效应很普遍,由于缺乏有关心理测量特性的报告,因此证明这些措施的可靠性或有效性的证据有限。措施之间的相互关系不一致。这些发现强调了未来的经验和理论工作的必要性,以扩大有关措施的心理测量属性的证据基础,制定新措施,并提出关于ToM与不同社会结果的相关性的更具体的假设。
    Theory of mind (ToM), the ability to understand and reason about mental states, has been extensively studied in young children and clinical populations. A growing interest in examining ToM in adults has emerged over the past two decades, but the extent to which existing measures are suitable for studying adults, especially in detecting individual differences, remains understudied. In this systematic review of 273 studies, 75 measures used to investigate individual differences in adults\' ToM were identified. Their sensitivity to individual differences, reliability, and validity were examined. Results suggest that ceiling effects were prevalent, and there was limited evidence to establish the reliability or validity of these measures due to the lack of reports of psychometric properties. Interrelations among measures were inconsistent. These findings highlight the need for future empirical and theoretical work to broaden the evidence base regarding psychometric properties of measures, to develop new measures, and to lay out more specific hypotheses about the relevance of ToM for different social outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    个体对情绪歧义表现出系统的效价偏差-一种特殊形式的解释偏差。越来越多的证据表明,大多数人最初对情感歧义做出负面反应,仅在随后的反应中有所不同。我们假设特质水平的认知重新评估-一种涉及重新解释刺激的情感意义的情绪调节策略-可能解释了效价偏差的个体差异。为了回答这个问题,我们对13项先前研究的14项效应大小(n=2,086)进行了随机效应荟萃分析,通过谷歌学者搜索确定。我们排除了(a)英语以外的其他语言的研究,(b)来自未经同行审查的来源,或(C)非经验来源。我们纳入了(A)情绪调节问卷的研究,(B)在进行任何研究特定操作之前的效价偏差的推定量度,和(c)成年人参与者(即,17+).支持我们的预测,我们发现具有较高特质重新评价的个体表现出较小的负偏差(r=-.18,z=-4.04,p<.001),而有一个较小的,性状表达抑制效果相反(r=.10,z=2.14,p=.03)。效果确实如此,然而,与效价偏差任务相比,在使用乱序句子任务的研究中观察到的效果更强的任务之间存在差异。尽管性状重新评估只占很小的差异,重新评估可能是导致歧义变化的一种机制。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023年APA,保留所有权利)。
    Individuals exhibit a systematic valence bias-a specific form of interpretation bias-in response to emotional ambiguity. Accumulating evidence suggests most people initially respond to emotional ambiguity negatively and differ only in subsequent responses. We hypothesized that trait-level cognitive reappraisal-an emotion regulation strategy involving the reinterpretation of affective meaning of stimuli-might explain individual differences in valence bias. To answer this question, we conducted a random-effects meta-analysis of 14 effect sizes from 13 prior studies (n = 2,086), identified via Google Scholar searches. We excluded studies (a) in languages other than English, (b) from non-peer-reviewed sources, or (c) nonempirical sources. We included studies with (a) the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, (b) a putative measure of valence bias prior to any study-specific manipulations, and (c) adult human participants (i.e., 17+). Supporting our prediction, we found individuals with higher trait reappraisal exhibited a less negative bias (r = -.18, z = -4.04, p < .001), whereas there was a smaller, opposite effect for trait expressive suppression (r = .10, z = 2.14, p = .03). The effects did, however, vary across tasks with stronger effects observed among studies using the scrambled sentences task compared to the valence bias task. Although trait reappraisal accounted for only a small amount of variance, reappraisal may be one mechanism contributing to variability in response to ambiguity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了提高性能和更快地恢复,建议运动员比平时多吃,并摄入更高剂量的简单碳水化合物,锻炼期间和之后。运动能量补充剂含有食品添加剂,如人造甜味剂,乳化剂,酸度调节剂,防腐剂,和盐,这可能对肠道微生物群有害并损害肠道屏障功能。肠屏障在营养选择性转移的双向调节中起着关键作用。水,和电解质,同时预防,有害物质的入口(选择性渗透)。肠道菌群有助于宿主通过代谢调节肠道稳态,保护,和免疫功能。全球范围内,肠道健康对于维持运动员的全身稳态至关重要,为了确保适当的消化,代谢,和底物吸收。胃肠道不适是耐力比赛中表现不佳和辍学的重要原因。这些并发症与肠道平衡的丧失直接相关,主要与微生物群失调和肠道渗漏有关。总之,运动员必须谨慎摄入超加工食品,特别是运动营养补充剂中含有的食品。这篇综述指出了应根据个体肠道功能实施和/或停止的具体营养干预措施。
    To improve performance and recovery faster, athletes are advised to eat more often than usual and consume higher doses of simple carbohydrates, during and after exercise. Sports energetic supplements contain food additives, such as artificial sweeteners, emulsifiers, acidity regulators, preservatives, and salts, which could be harmful to the gut microbiota and impair the intestinal barrier function. The intestinal barrier plays a critical function in bidirectionally regulation of the selective transfer of nutrients, water, and electrolytes, while preventing at the same time, the entrance of harmful substances (selective permeability). The gut microbiota helps to the host to regulate intestinal homeostasis through metabolic, protective, and immune functions. Globally, the gut health is essential to maintain systemic homeostasis in athletes, and to ensure proper digestion, metabolization, and substrate absorption. Gastrointestinal complaints are an important cause of underperformance and dropout during endurance events. These complications are directly related to the loss of gut equilibrium, mainly linked to microbiota dysbiosis and leaky gut. In summary, athletes must be cautious with the elevated intake of ultra-processed foods and specifically those contained on sports nutrition supplements. This review points out the specific nutritional interventions that should be implemented and/or discontinued depending on individual gut functionality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:通常使用预加载范式来评估调节能量摄入的能力,以测量短期能量补偿。在儿童中,这种范式存在很大的变异性,无论是在研究中还是在研究中,人们对此知之甚少。
    目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在更好地了解影响儿童能量补偿变异性的因素。我们测试了1)儿童是否表现出“良好的”能量补偿,定义为调整膳食摄入量与预负荷摄入量相称,以及2)儿童能量补偿的差异,性别,和体重状态(连续和分类评估)。
    方法:遵循系统评价的标准指南来搜索PubMed,PsychInfo,和WebofScience。研究设计数据(预载形式,预加载到进餐间隔,预加载能量差,研究环境)和参与者特征(性别,年龄,体重状态)从29个符合纳入标准的实验中提取,13个纳入荟萃分析。COMPx,比较高与低能量预负荷后的食物摄入量的线性变换,是结果。计算了树篱g,仅随机截距模型测试了COMPx和性别之间的关联,年龄,和体重状态。
    结果:系统评价揭示了关于儿童能量补偿和个体间差异的作用的混合结果。荟萃分析模型显示,儿童对预负荷能量补偿不足(过度)(β=-0.38,p=0.008)。性别(β=0.11,p=0.76),年龄(β=0.03,p=0.75),体重(连续评估;β=-0.07,p=0.37)与补偿无关。超重/肥胖(分类评估)的儿童比健康体重的儿童补偿不足(β=0.18,p=0.04)。
    结论:系统评价强调了研究之间的广泛差异,而荟萃分析显示了不同儿童体重状况的COMPx差异,而不是年龄或性别.建议跨研究标准化协议,同时设计足够有力的研究,旨在先验地测试个体间的差异。建议使用COMPx的替代方法,以更好地表征儿童的能量补偿能力。
    在PROSPERO注册:CRD42020197748。
    The ability to regulate energy intake is often assessed using a preloading paradigm to measure short-term energy compensation. In children, large variability exists with this paradigm both within- and across- studies and is poorly understood.
    This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to better understand factors contributing to variability in children\'s energy compensation. We tested 1) whether children demonstrated \"good\" energy compensation, defined as adjusting meal intake commensurate with preload intake and 2) differences in children\'s energy compensation by child age, sex, and weight status (assessed both continuously and categorically).
    Standard guidelines for systematic review were followed to search PubMed, PsychInfo, and Web of Science. Data on study design (preload form, preload-to-meal interval, preload energy difference, study setting) and participant characteristics (sex, age, weight status) were extracted from 29 experiments meeting inclusion criteria, and 13 were included in meta-analyses. COMPx (energy compensation index), a linear transformation comparing food intake following a high- vs. low-energy preload, was the outcome. Hedge\'s g was calculated, and random intercept-only models tested associations between COMPx and sex, age, and weight status.
    The systematic review revealed mixed results regarding children\'s energy compensation and the role of inter-individual differences. Meta-analytic models revealed that children undercompensated (overate) for preload energy (β = -0.38; P = 0.008). Sex (β = 0.11; P = 0.76), age (β = 0.03; P = 0.75), and weight (assessed continuously; β = -0.07, P = 0.37) were not related to compensation. Children with overweight/obesity (assessed categorically) undercompensated more than children with healthy weight (β = 0.18; P = 0.04).
    The systematic review highlighted wide variability across studies, while the meta-analysis demonstrated differences in COMPx by child weight status but not by age or sex. Standardizing protocols across studies is recommended, along with designing adequately powered studies aiming to test inter-individual differences a priori. Alternative approaches to the use of COMPx are recommended to allow better characterization of children\'s energy compensation ability. This study was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42020197748.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    社交媒体旨在连接人们并支持人际关系。然而,社交媒体的使用是否与自我和他人之间的联系有关是未知的。本研究回顾了心理学的发现,以解决社交媒体的使用是否与将自我定义和表达为与他人相关(即,相互依赖)与独立(即,独立性)以及这种联系是否同时出现在个人主义和集体主义文化中。符合条件的研究报告了社交媒体使用之间的关联(例如,花费的时间,使用频率)和支持独立性的特征(例如,自恋,嫉妒,自我增强)。在审查的研究中,133个效应大小的荟萃分析结果表明,社交媒体的使用与独立性有关,而不是相互依赖。这种关系在集体主义文化中比在个人主义文化中更为明显。这些发现表明,与社交媒体使用相关的特征与基于社交媒体设计的人们可能期望的不同。
    Social media were designed to connect people and support interpersonal relationships. However, whether social media use is linked to the connection between the self and others is unknown. The present research reviewed findings across psychology to address whether social media use is linked to defining and expressing the self as connected to others (i.e., interdependence) versus separate from others (i.e., independence) and whether this link appears in both individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Eligible studies reported an association between social media use (e.g., time spent, frequency of use) and a characteristic supportive of independence (e.g., narcissism, envy, self-enhancement). Meta-analytic results of 133 effect sizes across the reviewed studies show that social media use is linked to independence rather than interdependence. This relationship was more pronounced in collectivistic cultures than in individualistic cultures. These findings suggest that characteristics linked to social media use differ from what one might expect based on the design of social media to connect people.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号