Immunologic Tests

免疫学检查
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:结直肠癌(CRC)筛查计划B-PREDICT是一个基于人群的邀请两阶段筛查项目,使用粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)进行初始筛查,然后对FIT阳性的患者进行结肠镜检查。B-PREDICT与机会性结肠镜检查(OPP-COL)进行比较,在全国范围的筛查计划中进行。
    方法:在B-PREDICT中,奥地利联邦州Burgenland的所有居民,每年邀请40至80岁的人参加FIT测试。在2003年1月至2014年12月12日期间在Burgenland接受初次结肠镜检查的所有个体均纳入本研究。将来自FIT触发的邀请筛查计划B-PREDICT的个体与非FIT触发的OPP-COL的个体进行比较。
    结果:将来自B-PREDICT的15133名个体与OPP-COL的10045名个体进行了比较。CRC检出率为1.34%(CI-95%,B-预测中的[1.15;1.52])与OPP-COL中的0.54%相比(95%-CI,[0.39;0.68]p<0.001)。在接受FIT筛查的人群中,与接受结肠镜检查的普通人群相比,年龄标准化的CRC发病率下降更为明显。每年的发病率变化为-4.4%(95%-CI,[-5.1;-3.7])与-1.8%(95%-CI,[-1.9;-1.6]p<0.001)。
    结论:与OPP-COL相比,B-PREDICT显示CRC和HRA的检出率高两倍。
    BACKGROUND: The colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program B-PREDICT is a population based invited two stage screening project using a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) for initial screening followed by a colonoscopy for those with a positive FIT. B-PREDICT was compared with the opportunistic screening colonoscopy (OPP-COL), performed in course of the nationwide screening program.
    METHODS: Within B-PREDICT all residents of the Austrian federal state Burgenland, aged between 40 and 80 are annually invited to FIT testing. All individuals who underwent initial colonoscopy in Burgenland between 01/2003 and 12/2014, were included in this study. Individuals from the FIT-triggered invited screening program B-PREDICT were compared with those from the non-FIT triggered OPP-COL.
    RESULTS: 15 133 individuals from B-PREDICT were compared to 10 045 individuals with OPP-COL. CRC detection rates were 1.34% (CI-95%, [1.15; 1.52]) in B-PREDICT compared to 0.54% in OPP-COL (95%-CI, [0.39; 0.68] p < 0.001). The decrease in the age standardized incidence rates of CRC was more pronounced in the population screened with FIT than in the general population screened with colonoscopy. Changes in incidence rates per year were -4.4% (95%-CI, [-5.1; -3.7]) vs. -1.8% (95%-CI, [-1.9; -1.6] p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: B-PREDICT shows a two-fold higher detection rate of CRC as well as HRA compared to OPP-COL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)抗原检测的即时检测已被广泛用于各种环境的快速诊断。然而,非实验室人员进行的COVID-19抗原检测的诊断性能研究有限。在这项研究中,我们旨在阐明GenBodyCOVID-19快速抗原在实验室专业人员和非实验室人员之间的诊断性能。我们回顾性分析了2021年11月1日至2022年6月30日同时接受GenBodyCOVID-19快速抗原检测和逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)的患者数据。在实验室和非实验室操作人员之间比较了抗原测试的诊断性能,使用RT-PCR作为金标准。灵敏度,特异性,正似然比,负似然比,诊断赔率比,正预测值,负预测值,并根据PCR循环阈值(Ct)值计算准确度,进行敏感性分析.在11963名患者中,1273(10.6%)使用实时RT-PCR检测为阳性。敏感性,特异性,正似然比,负似然比,诊断赔率比,正预测值,负预测值,95%置信区间的GenBodyCOVID-19快速抗原检测准确率为79.92%(77.26%-82.39%),99.23%(98.73%-99.57%),103.25(62.31-171.11),0.2(0.18-0.23),510.18(299.81-868.18),98.11%(96.91%-98.85%),90.75%(89.64%-91.75%)和92.76%(91.76%-93.67%),分别,非实验室工作人员和79.80%(74.78%-84.22%),99.99%(99.94%-100.00%),6983.92(983.03-49617.00),0.2(0.16-0.25),34566.45(4770.30-250474.46)99.58%(97.09%-99.94%),99.32%(99.15%-99.46%),和99.33%(99.13%-99.48%),分别,实验室工作人员。值得注意的是,当PCRCt值超过25时,两组的灵敏度均降低至<40%。非实验室工作人员对GenBodyCOVID-19快速抗原的诊断性能与实验室专业人员相当。然而,应该注意的是,当PCRCt值超过25时,抗原测试的灵敏度降低。总的来说,GenBodyCOVID-19抗原检测是流行病期间非实验室工作人员的可行选择。
    Point-of-care tests for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) antigen detection have been widely used for rapid diagnosis in various settings. However, research on the diagnostic performance of the COVID-19 antigen test performed by non-laboratory personnel is limited. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen between laboratory professionals and non-laboratory staff. We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent both GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen testing and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) between November 01, 2021, and June 30, 2022. The diagnostic performance of the antigen test was compared between laboratory and non-laboratory operators, using RT-PCR as the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated and sensitivity analysis was performed based on the PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value. Of the 11,963 patients, 1273 (10.6%) tested positive using real-time RT-PCR. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen test with 95% confidence interval were 79.92% (77.26%-82.39%), 99.23% (98.73%-99.57%), 103.25 (62.31-171.11), 0.2 (0.18-0.23), 510.18 (299.81-868.18), 98.11% (96.91%-98.85%), 90.75% (89.64%-91.75%) and 92.76% (91.76%-93.67%), respectively, for non-laboratory staff and 79.80% (74.78%-84.22%), 99.99% (99.94%-100.00%), 6983.92 (983.03-49617.00), 0.2 (0.16-0.25), 34566.45 (4770.30-250474.46) 99.58% (97.09%-99.94%), 99.32% (99.15%-99.46%), and 99.33% (99.13%-99.48%), respectively, for laboratory staff. Notably, when the PCR Ct value exceeded 25, the sensitivity of both the groups decreased to < 40%. The diagnostic performance of GenBody COVID-19 rapid antigen performed by non-laboratory staff was comparable to that of laboratory professionals. However, it should be noted that the sensitivity of the antigen tests decreased when the PCR Ct value exceeded 25. Overall, the GenBody COVID-19 antigen test is a viable option for non-laboratory staff during an epidemic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    这项研究(1)确定了自初始疫苗方案以来的时间关联,加强剂量收据,和COVID-19抗体滴度病史,以及滴度水平在定义的时期内的变化,(2)确定与低滴度水平相关的COVID-19风险。这项观察性研究使用了参加国家橄榄球联盟COVID-19监测计划的工作人员的数据。一群工作人员同意以抗体为重点的子研究,在此期间收集了详细的纵向数据。在接受抗体检测的所有工作人员中,确定了抗体测试后的COVID-19发病率。586个子研究参与者完成了初始抗体测试;80%(469)在50-101天后完成了后续测试。在389名在初始测试中没有得到加强的人中,滴度<1000AU/mL的几率(与≥1000AU/mL)自最终剂量以来每30天增加44%(比值比[OR]=1.44,95%置信区间[CI]:1.18-1.75)。在最初测试前没有COVID-19病史的126名参与者中,125(99%)的值>2500AU/ml;在随访中测试的90人中有86人(96%)保持在该值,在此期间没有发展为COVID-19。对参与监测计划的千名57名完全接种疫苗(抗体测试时330名[29%]加强)的个体进行了随访,以确定COVID-19状态。滴度<1000AU/mL的个体患COVID-19的风险是>2500AU/mL的个体的两倍(HR=2.02,95%CI:1.28-3.18)。疫苗接种后抗体水平降低;加强增加效价值。虽然抗体水平不是感染免疫的明确代表,较低的滴度与较高的COVID-19发病率相关,建议加强对助推器的保护。
    This study (1) determined the association of time since initial vaccine regimen, booster dose receipt, and COVID-19 history with antibody titer, as well as change in titer levels over a defined period, and (2) determined risk of COVID-19 associated with low titer levels. This observational study used data from staff participating in the National Football League COVID-19 Monitoring Program. A cohort of staff consented to antibody-focused sub-study, during which detailed longitudinal data were collected. Among all staff in the program who received antibody testing, COVID-19 incidence following antibody testing was determined. Five hundred eighty-six sub-study participants completed initial antibody testing; 80% (469) completed follow-up testing 50-101 days later. Among 389 individuals who were not boosted at initial testing, the odds of titer < 1000 AU/mL (vs. ≥1000 AU/mL) increased 44% (odds ratio [OR] = 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-1.75) for every 30 days since final dose. Among 126 participants boosted before initial testing with no COVID-19 history, 125 (99%) had a value > 2500 AU/ml; 86 (96%) of 90 tested at follow-up and did not develop COVID-19 in the interim remained at that value. One thousand fifty-seven fully vaccinated (330 [29%] boosted at antibody test) individuals participating in the monitoring program were followed to determine COVID-19 status. Individuals with titer value < 1000 AU/mL had twice the risk of COVID-19 as those with >2500 AU/mL (HR = 2.02, 95% CI: 1.28-3.18). Antibody levels decrease postvaccination; boosting increases titer values. While antibody level is not a clear proxy for infection immunity, lower titer values are associated with higher COVID-19 incidence, suggesting increased protection from boosters.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在分析SARS-CoV-2抗原检测的临床试验要求,以探讨临床试验的合理性和科学性。方法:比较SARS-CoV-2抗原试验的上市指南,分析临床试验的要求,找出我国之间的异同,美国和欧洲。结果:中国SARS-CoV-2抗原试验的临床试验要求,美国和欧洲在方法上是一致的。然而,在方案设计要求方面存在差异.结论:临床试验要求的差异源于不同地区的法规和实际情况,但所有的临床试验都是为了获得有效的产品临床性能。
    Aims: This study was designed to analyze the requirements for clinical trials of SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing to explore the rationality and scientific rigor of clinical trials. Methods: The guidelines for the listing of SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests were compared and the requirements for clinical trials were analyzed to find similarities and differences between China, the USA and Europe. Results: The requirements for clinical trials of SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests in China, the USA and Europe were consistent in terms of methods. However, differences were found in the requirements for protocol design. Conclusion: The differences in clinical trial requirements stem from regulations and the actual conditions across regions, but all clinical trials are designed to obtain valid clinical performance of products.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    循环免疫球蛋白E(IgE)浓度的测定有助于哮喘和过敏性疾病的诊断和治疗。鉴定与IgE相关的基因表达特征可能阐明IgE调控的新途径。为此,我们进行了一项发现性的全转录组关联研究,以鉴定来自Framingham心脏研究的5,345名参与者的全血RNA中与循环IgE水平相关的差异表达基因,该研究涉及17,873个mRNA水平转录本.我们以<0.05的错误发现率鉴定了216个显著的转录物。我们使用两项独立的外部研究的荟萃分析进行复制:儿童哮喘管理计划(n=610)和哥斯达黎加哮喘遗传流行病学研究(n=326);然后我们逆转了发现和复制队列,揭示了59个双向复制的重要基因。基因本体论分析显示,这些基因中的许多与免疫功能通路有关,包括防御反应,炎症反应,和细胞因子的产生。孟德尔随机化(MR)分析揭示了四个基因(CLC,CCDC21,S100A13和GCNT1)作为IgE水平的推定因果(p<0.05)调节剂。GCNT1(β=1.5,p=0.01)-在与哮喘和过敏性疾病相关的表达的MR分析中的最高结果-在调节T辅助1型细胞归巢中起作用,淋巴细胞运输,和B细胞分化。我们的发现建立在对IgE调控的先验知识的基础上,并提供了对潜在分子机制的更深入理解。我们鉴定的IgE相关基因,特别是与MR分析有关的基因,可以作为哮喘和IgE相关疾病的有希望的治疗靶标。
    Measurement of circulating immunoglobulin E (IgE) concentration is helpful for diagnosing and treating asthma and allergic diseases. Identifying gene expression signatures associated with IgE might elucidate novel pathways for IgE regulation. To this end, we performed a discovery transcriptome-wide association study to identify differentially expressed genes associated with circulating IgE levels in whole-blood derived RNA from 5,345 participants in the Framingham Heart Study across 17,873 mRNA gene-level transcripts. We identified 216 significant transcripts at a false discovery rate <0.05. We conducted replication using the meta-analysis of two independent external studies: the Childhood Asthma Management Program (n=610) and the Genetic Epidemiology of Asthma in Costa Rica Study (n=326); we then reversed the discovery and replication cohorts, which revealed 59 significant genes that replicated in both directions. Gene ontology analysis revealed that many of these genes were implicated in immune function pathways, including defense response, inflammatory response, and cytokine production. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis revealed four genes (CLC, CCDC21, S100A13, and GCNT1) as putatively causal (p<0.05) regulators of IgE levels. GCNT1 (beta=1.5, p=0.01)-which is a top result in the MR analysis of expression in relation to asthma and allergic diseases-plays a role in regulating T helper type 1 cell homing, lymphocyte trafficking, and B cell differentiation. Our findings build upon prior knowledge of IgE regulation and provide a deeper understanding of underlying molecular mechanisms. The IgE-associated genes that we identified-particularly those implicated in MR analysis-can be explored as promising therapeutic targets for asthma and IgE-related diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这个以人口为基础的7538名成年人队列中,联合免疫球蛋白(Ig)G,IgA,严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)疫苗接种后测得的IgM(IgG/A/M)抗峰滴度可预测对突破性SARS-CoV-2感染的保护作用。通过调整影响SARS-CoV-2暴露风险的因素,歧视得到了显着改善,包括家庭过度拥挤,公共交通使用,参观室内公共场所。抗标IgG/A/M滴度与中和抗体滴度呈正相关(rs=0.80[95%置信区间,.72-.86];P<.001)和S肽刺激的干扰素-γ浓度(rs=0.31[.13-.47];P<.001)。
    In this population-based cohort of 7538 adults, combined immunoglobulin (Ig) G, IgA, and IgM (IgG/A/M) anti-spike titers measured after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination were predictive of protection against breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection. Discrimination was significantly improved by adjustment for factors influencing risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure, including household overcrowding, public transport use, and visits to indoor public places. Anti-spike IgG/A/M titers showed positive correlation with neutralizing antibody titers (rs = 0.80 [95% confidence interval, .72-.86]; P < .001) and S peptide-stimulated interferon-γ concentrations (rs = 0.31 [.13-.47]; P < .001).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase II
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全身再生,从小碎片中重建完整个体的能力,在带状蠕虫(Nemertea门)中很少见,但存在于pilidiophoran物种Lineussanguineus中。这个物种可以从一个微小的中体部分再生完整的个体,甚至从四分之一的一块,只要它保留了外侧神经索的碎片。虽然其他一些不相关的带状蠕虫也是极好的再生器,血L.sanguineus在最近进化了其再生能力方面是独一无二的,因此为深入了解再生增强的进化机制提供了绝佳的机会。有趣的是,它的姐妹物种Lineuslacteus和Lineuspseudolacteus,第三个物种来自其他两个物种最近的杂交,它们的再生能力不同:虽然乳杆菌不能再生丢失的头,假肢能够前再生,尽管速度比血根病慢。血根病在两个半球的温带海岸都有全球分布,很容易在潮间带栖息地找到,并且可以生存,饲料和繁殖通过无性繁殖与最小的努力在实验室设置。所有这些使这个物种成为再生生物学研究的绝佳候选者。在这一章中,我们提出要收集的协议,鉴定和繁殖L.sanguineus,以研究该物种中发现的非凡的全身再生能力。
    Whole-body regeneration, the ability to reconstruct complete individuals from small fragments, is rare among ribbon worms (phylum Nemertea) but present in the pilidiophoran species Lineus sanguineus. This species can regenerate complete individuals from a tiny midbody section, and even from a quarter of a piece, provided it retains a fragment of a lateral nerve cord. While a few other unrelated species of ribbon worms are also excellent regenerators, L. sanguineus is unique in having evolved its regenerative abilities quite recently and thus offers an exceptional opportunity to gain insight into the evolutionary mechanisms of regeneration enhancement. Interestingly, both its sister species Lineus lacteus and Lineus pseudolacteus, a third species derived from the recent hybridization of the other two, differ in their regeneration abilities: while L. lacteus is uncapable of regenerating a lost head, L. pseudolacteus is capable of anterior regeneration, albeit at a slower rate than L. sanguineus. L. sanguineus has a worldwide distribution in temperate shores of both hemispheres, is readily found at intertidal habitats, and can survive, feed and be bred through asexual replication with minimal effort in laboratory settings. All the above make this species a superb candidate for studies of regenerative biology. In this chapter, we present protocols to collect, identify and breed L. sanguineus to study the extraordinary whole-body regeneration abilities found in this species.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    Twice weekly lateral flow tests (LFTs) for secondary school children was UK Government policy from 8 March 2021. We evaluate use of LFTs (both supervised at test centres, and home test kits) in school-aged children in Cheshire and Merseyside.
    We report (i) number of LFT positives (ii) proportion of LFT positive with confirmatory reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test within 2 days, and (iii) agreement between LFT-positive and confirmatory PCR, and dependence of (i-iii) on COVID-19 prevalence.
    1 248 468 LFTs were taken by 211 255 12-18 years old, and 163 914 by 52 116 5-11 years old between 6 November 2020 and 31 July 2021. Five thousand three hundred and fourteen (2.5%) 12-18 years old and 1996 (3.8%) 5-11 years old returned LFT positives, with 3829 (72.1%) and 1535 (76.9%) confirmatory PCRs, and 3357 (87.7%) and 1383 (90.1%) confirmatory PCR-positives, respectively.Monthly proportions of LFT positive with PCR negative varied between 4.7% and 35.3% in 12-18 years old (corresponding proportion of all tests positive: 9.7% and 0.3%).Deprivation and non-White ethnicity were associated with reduced uptake of confirmatory PCR.
    Substantial inequalities in confirmatory testing need more attention to avoid further disadvantage through education loss. When prevalence is low additional measures, including confirmatory testing, are needed. Local Directors of Public Health taking more control over schools testing may be needed.
    DHSC, MRC, NIHR, EPSRC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在酶联免疫吸附测定中高水平的抗BP180抗体和治疗结束时持续阳性的直接免疫荧光(免疫学测试,[ITs])是大疱性类天疱疮患者停止治疗(TC)后复发的预测因子。
    评估基于免疫学的TC决定对大疱性类天疱疮TC后3个月和6个月复发率的现实生活影响。
    回顾性多中心研究包括患者在TC后随访近6个月。根据TC决定是否与TC前3个月进行的ITs结果进行分类,尽管有ITs的结果或没有执行ITs。
    我们纳入了238名患者。TC后三个月,36例患者出现复发:符合IT结果的95例TC患者中有14例(14.7%);尽管有IT,但仍有TC的21例中有5例(23.8%);122例TC无IT的17例(13.9%;P=5)。TC后六个月,复发率为18.9%,28.6%,和18.9%(P=0.56),分别,在3组。
    回顾性设计和有限的随访。
    在现实生活中,在大疱性类天疱疮中,与经典的基于临床的决定相比,基于ITs结果的TC决定的3个月和6个月复发率没有显著降低.
    A high level of anti-BP180 antibodies on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and a persistent positive direct immunofluorescence at the end of treatment (immunologic tests, [ITs]) are predictors of relapse after treatment cessation (TC) in patients with bullous pemphigoid.
    To evaluate the real-life impact of the immunologic-based decision of TC on the 3- and 6-month relapse rates after TC in bullous pemphigoid.
    Retrospective multicentric study included patients followed almost 6 months after TC. Patients were classified according to whether the TC decision was in accordance with the results of ITs performed during the 3 months before TC, despite the results of ITs or without ITs performed.
    We included 238 patients. Three months after TC, 36 patients showed relapse: 14 of 95 patients with TC in accordance with IT results (14.7%); 5 of 21 with TC despite ITs (23.8%); and 17 of 122 with TC without ITs (13.9%; P = .5). Six months after TC, the relapse rate was 18.9%, 28.6%, and 18.9% (P = .56), respectively, in the 3 groups.
    The retrospective design and the limited follow up.
    In real-life practice, in bullous pemphigoid, the 3- and 6-month relapse rates were not significantly reduced with TC decision based on results of ITs as compared with a classic clinical-based decision.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号