BACKGROUND: Infection by SARS-CoV2 has become a challenge, especially for immunocompromised patients who show a weaker humoral response to COVID-19 vaccine. Tixagevimab+cilgavimab (Evusheld) is a combination of human monoclonal antibodies that can be used for pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent infection or disease by SARS-CoV2.
OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of Evusheld by comparing an Exposed and an Unexposed group.
METHODS: Immunocompromised patients were enrolled in the Evusheld Group between March and September 2022. All patients had anti-spike IgG antibody levels <260 BAU/ml before administration of Evusheld. Blood samples for serological evaluations were collected, and anti-Spike antibodies were tested. For the Unexposed Group, a serologic test was performed at enrollment and a questionnaire was performed after 6 months.
RESULTS: 43 patients received Evusheld pre-exposure prophylaxis and 45 patients not receiving Evusheld were enrolled in the Unexposed group. The median age was 59.0 years in the Evusheld group, and 63.0 in the unexposed group. In the Evusheld group, during the Omicron wave in Italy, 23.3% of subjects developed symptomatic infection compared to 42.2% in the unexposed group. A majority of infections was seen in male respect to female patients. No difference in length of infection between the groups was seen. Antibody level remained higher than the basal threshold at 180 days from enrollment.
CONCLUSIONS: Evusheld seems to reduce the rate of symptomatic infection in immunocompromised patients. Further data are required to determine whether this prophylaxis may have a longer-lasting effect over time.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a major cause of acute viral hepatitis. Since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, immunocompromised individuals face an increased risk of HEV and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) co-infection, posing a threat of liver failure and prolonged illness. A 69-year-old male, with a history of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, was co-infected with HEV and SARS-CoV-2. Given the progressive decline in liver function post-admission, steroid therapy was initiated, which led to treatment-related complications. Additionally, the patient experienced an aggravation of COVID-19 symptoms due to persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection, effectively managed through a combination of antiviral medications and corticosteroids. This case describes the intricate clinical trajectory and therapeutic approach for managing HEV and SARS-CoV-2 co-infection, underscoring the potential efficacy of short-term corticosteroid intervention alongside comprehensive antiviral treatment.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of immunocompromised individuals with COVID-19 remains a significant concern. Information regarding the clinical and virological characteristics of immunocompromised patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the Omicron variant period is limited.
METHODS: Medical records of patients admitted to our hospital with COVID-19 during the Omicron (BA.1-5) epidemic were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical, virological (nasopharyngeal swabs and blood), and serological data were compared between immunocompromised patients receiving immunosuppressive medications (calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, or steroids) and control patients not receiving immunosuppressive medications.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight immunocompromised patients (25 transplant recipients) and 26 control patients were included. Fourteen of the immunocompromised patients (50%) received monoclonal antibodies. The immunocompromised group included 15 mild/moderate (53.6%), 10 severe (35.7%), and three critical (10.7%) disease severities. The mortality rate due to COVID-19 during hospitalization was 3.6% (1/28) in the immunocompromised group, with no difference between the two groups. Three cases of re-exacerbation after discharge occurred in the immunocompromised group and none in the control group. Linear regression based on nasopharyngeal real-time-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values according to the time since symptom onset showed markedly slower viral clearance in the immunocompromised group than in the control group (Pslope = 0.078). In the immunocompromised group, patients who received monoclonal antibodies showed faster viral clearance than those who did not receive monoclonal antibodies. The convalescent anti-spike IgG titers were comparable to those in the control group in patients who received monoclonal antibodies and significantly lower than those in the control patients in patients who did not receive monoclonal antibodies (P < 0.001). The prevalence of viremia at onset was significantly higher in the immunocompromised group than in the control group (35.7%, [10/28] vs. 11.5%, [3/26]; P = 0.003). All three patients with critical disease severity in the immunocompromised group exhibited viremia, one of whom died. All three patients with viremia in the control group were critical, of whom two died.
CONCLUSIONS: Immunocompromised individuals receiving immunosuppressive medications are more likely to show delayed post-infection SARS-CoV-2 viral clearance and the development of viremia, potentially resulting in worsening severity and outcomes, especially in viremic patients, even during the Omicron epidemic.

We present a case of recurrent multidrug-resistant Candida auris (C. auris) in a patient who required multiple hospitalizations. The patient\'s case was complicated by interval admissions to the intensive care unit for septic and hypovolemic shock for 12 months to manage C. auris fungemia. Despite adequate isolation precautions and appropriate antifungal treatment, this case demonstrates the profound implications of this emerging pathogen, specifically regarding invasive infections. Moreover, C. auris is rapidly becoming known as a multidrug-resistant organism, which limits treatment options and thus contributes to high mortality.

The vulnerability of immunocompromised patients to common or opportunistic viral infections is particularly high. The quantitation of viral load in clinical specimens is important for the diagnosis and management of the infection and reactivation in this patient population, particularly transplant recipients. As the new regulation \"IVDR\" regarding in vitro diagnosis methods is about to come into effect in France, diagnostic laboratories have to implement methods and systems compatible with this new regulation. Technical performance of the AltoStar® Adenovirus (AdV), Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and human Herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) DNA PCR Kits 1.5 was assessed on the AltoStar Automation system AM16 using reference kits in 146 clinical samples. Overall agreement in clinical specimens was 87.5 % (28/32), 96.8 % (62/64), 100 % (22/22), 100 % (28/28) and 92.8 % (26/28) for AdV, CMV (WB samples and other matrices), HHV-6 A&B respectively. Quantitative results were highly correlated and estimated to be equivalent within a 0.057-0.648 log-amount difference.We found that altona kits on The AltoStar AM16 system are suitable for clinical monitoring of AdV, CMV and HHV-6 in immunocompromised hosts.

Active and passive immunization is used in high-risk patients to prevent severe courses of COVID-19, but the impact of prophylactic neutralizing antibodies on the immune reaction to the mRNA vaccines has remained enigmatic. Here we show that CD4 T and B cell responses to Spikevax booster immunization are suppressed by the therapeutic antibodies Casirivimab and Imdevimab. B cell and T cell responses were significantly induced in controls but not in antibody-treated patients. The data indicates that humoral immunity, i. e. high levels of antibodies, negatively impacts reactive immunity, resulting in blunted cellular responses upon boosting. This argues for temporal separation of vaccination efforts; with active vaccination preferably applied before prophylactic therapeutic antibody treatment.

Complications due to HCMV infection or reactivation remain a challenging clinical problem in immunocompromised patients, mainly due to insufficient or absent T-cell functionality. Knowledge of viral targets is crucial to improve monitoring of high-risk patients and optimise antiviral T-cell therapy. To expand the epitope spectrum, genetically-engineered dendritic cells (DCs) and fibroblasts were designed to secrete soluble (s)HLA-A*11:01 and infected with an HCMV mutant lacking immune evasion molecules (US2-6 + 11). More than 700 HLA-A*11:01-restricted epitopes, including more than 50 epitopes derived from a broad range of HCMV open-reading-frames (ORFs) were identified by mass spectrometry and screened for HLA-A*11:01-binding using established prediction tools. The immunogenicity of the 24 highest scoring new candidates was evaluated in vitro in healthy HLA-A*11:01+/HCMV+ donors. Thus, four subdominant epitopes and one immunodominant epitope, derived from the anti-apoptotic protein UL36 and ORFL101C (A11SAL), were identified. Their HLA-A*11:01 complex stability was verified in vitro. In depth analyses revealed highly proliferative and cytotoxic memory T-cell responses against A11SAL, with T-cell responses comparable to the immunodominant HLA-A*02:01-restricted HCMVpp65NLV epitope. A11SAL-specific T cells were also detectable in vivo in immunosuppressed transplant patients and shown to be effective in an in vitro HCMV-infection model, suggesting their crucial role in inhibiting viral replication and improvement of patient\'s outcome. The developed in vitro pipeline is the first to utilise genetically-engineered DCs to identify naturally presented immunodominant HCMV-derived epitopes. It therefore offers advantages over in silico predictions, is transferable to other HLA alleles, and will significantly expand the repertoire of viral targets to improve therapeutic options.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hematological malignancies are at a high risk of developing invasive fungal infections (IFI) because they undergo several cycles of treatment leading to episodes of neutropenia. In addition, they alternate between hospital stays and periods spent at home. Thus, when an IFI is diagnosed during their hospital stays, it is highly challenging to identify the origin of the fungal contamination. The objective of this study was to analyze at home fungal exposure of 20 patients with leukemia by taking air and water samples in their living residence.
METHODS: Air was sampled in 3 rooms of each home with a portable air system impactor. Tap water was collected at 3 water distribution points of each home. For positive samples, fungi were identified by mass spectrometry or on the basis of their morphological features.
RESULTS: 85 % of homes revealed the presence in air of Aspergillus spp. and those belonging to the section Fumigati presented the highest concentrations and the greatest frequency of isolation. Concerning mucorales, Rhizopus spp. and Mucor spp. were isolated in air of 20 % and 5 % of dwellings, respectively. In 4 homes, more than 70 % of the fungal species identified in air were potential opportunists; these were mainly Aspergillus spp. with concentrations greater than 20 cfu/m3. The water samples revealed the presence of Fusarium in 3 dwellings, with concentrations up to 80 cfu/L. Finally, for one patient, fungal species isolated during a period of hospitalization were phenotypically similar to those isolated in samples taken at home. For a second patient, a PCR Mucorale was positive on a sample of bronchoalveolar fluid while air samples taken at his home also revealed also the presence of mucorales.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of opportunistic fungal species in the air of all the explored homes suggests the need for strengthened preventive measures in the home of immunocompromised patients. It would be interesting to compare the fungi isolated (from patients and from their environment) by genotyping studies aimed at specifying the correspondence existing between fungal species present in the patients\' homes and those responsible for IFI in the same patients.

暂无摘要。

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the immunogenicity and safety of an additional heterologous (viral vector) versus homologous (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine dose among non-seroconverted immunocompromised patients after a two-dose primary series of mRNA vaccine. We searched studies published up to 21 June 2023 in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. The meta-analysis was conducted to compare the seropositivity rates based on anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein IgG (anti-S IgG) and SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell immune response rates, assessed by interferon-γ release assay at 4 weeks, and the incidences of serious adverse events (SAEs) within 28 days between the two vaccine regimens. In four included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), there were no statistically significant differences in the seropositive rate of anti-S IgG (risk ratio [RR]: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.48-1.29) and the concentration of SARS-CoV-2 interferon-γ (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.96-1.48) between heterologous and homologous regimens. The heterologous regimen exhibited a significantly lower incidence of injection pain (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.45-0.69), but a higher incidence of headache (RR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.02-2.02) compared with the homologous regimen. No vaccine-related SAEs were reported within 28 days following vaccination. An additional heterologous or homologous COVID-19 vaccine dose was well tolerated and demonstrated a comparable vaccine immunogenicity among non-seroconverted immunocompromised patients who were initially vaccinated with a two-dose COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. This finding supports the recommendations of an extended primary series of COVID-19 vaccination in immunocompromised persons.