IDDSI

IDDSI
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:国际吞咽困难饮食标准化倡议(IDDSI)为质地改良饮食(TMD)和增稠液体创建了全球标准化定义,以提高吞咽困难患者的安全性和护理。IDDSI框架指导卫生保健设施,如老年护理,为有风险的病人提供食物。
    未经评估:本研究旨在设计,交付,并评估量身定制的干预措施,以促进IDDSI在老年护理中的实施。
    未经评估:五个老年护理机构接受了量身定制的干预措施,这是由执行变更过程的专家建议指导的,并使用了先前研究中确定的相应障碍:1)定制材料,delivery,和规划;2)意见领袖和专业投入;3)吸引和参与员工的战略;4)反思和评价。对IDDSI标准的膳食依从性和员工知识获取是评估干预效果的主要结果。从设施经理处获得书面同意。员工培训由营养师提供,伴随着电子和印刷材料。对TMD每日菜单上列出的所有项目进行了审计(午餐,晚餐,和中餐)。干预前和干预后6个月进行了TMDIDDSI审核和工作人员自我管理的调查。
    未经评估:在干预前后对68和79份TMD膳食/项目进行了审核,分别。在所有3个级别的TMD中发现了膳食依从性的显着改善,包括柔软和咬合大小(50%;P=0.0001),切碎和潮湿(44%;P=0.0024),和puéed(42%;P=0.0024)。干预后IDDSI的总体依从性增加了46%(P<0.0001)。工作人员在吞咽困难和IDDSI知识部分得分均较高(P<0.0001)。
    UNASSIGNED:量身定制的干预措施促进了老年护理中的IDDSI实施,这一点由TMD依从性和员工知识的提高证明,仍在干预后6个月。
    UNASSIGNED: The International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) has created global standardized definitions for texture-modified diets (TMDs) and thickened liquids to improve the safety and care for individuals with swallowing difficulties. The IDDSI framework guides health care facilities, such as aged care, to provide food to at-risk patients.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to design, deliver, and evaluate a tailored intervention to facilitate IDDSI implementation in aged care.
    UNASSIGNED: Five aged care facilities received tailored interventions, which were guided by the Expert Recommendation for Implementing Change process and used the corresponding barriers identified in the previous study: 1) tailored material, delivery, and planning; 2) opinion leaders and professional input; 3) strategies to attract and involve staff; and 4) reflections and evaluations. Meal compliance against IDDSI standards and staff knowledge acquisition were the primary outcomes evaluating the impact of the intervention. Written consent was obtained from facility managers. Staff trainings were delivered by a dietitian, accompanied with electronic and printed materials. An audit was conducted on all items listed on the TMD daily menu (lunch, dinner, and midmeals). TMD IDDSI audits and staff self-administered surveys were conducted before and 6 mo after the intervention.
    UNASSIGNED: Audits of 68 and 79 TMD meals/items were conducted pre- and postintervention, respectively. Significant improvement in meal compliance was found in all 3 levels of TMDs, including soft and bite-sized (50%; P = 0.0001), minced and moist (44%; P = 0.0024), and puréed (42%; P = 0.0024). The overall IDDSI compliance increased by 46% postintervention (P < 0.0001). Staff achieved higher scores in both dysphagia and IDDSI knowledge sections (P < 0.0001).
    UNASSIGNED: Tailored interventions facilitated IDDSI implementation in aged care evidenced by increased TMD compliance and staff knowledge, which remained at 6 mo postintervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在评估香港一家主要增稠剂制造商提供的现有液体增稠指南,并为实施IDDSI框架提供指导。15名对液体增稠幼稚的参与者被要求从三种饮料基料中制备增稠的液体样品(即,奶茶,中国茶,和凉茶)在两个目标稠度水平(即,轻度和中等/中等厚度)基于两个准则(即,制造商指南和IDDSI驱动指南)。用流变学方法测量样品的粘度以反映液体稠度。制造商指南在两种稠度水平下产生了可区分的粘度(F(1,35.464)=113.764,p<0.001,ηp2=0.802),以及不同饮料基料的不同粘度(F(1.267,35.464=92.951,p<0.001,ηp2=0.769)。制造商和IDDSI驱动的指南之间的比较表明,后者导致所有饮料基料和两种稠度水平的液体样品更粘稠。两种指南之间的差异具有统计学意义(F(1,28)=35.137,p<0.001,ηp2=0.557)。当浓缩非水饮料时,仅遵循制造商的指南可能会导致所得稠度与规定稠度之间的差异。因此,它应该被认为不足以确保吞咽安全。应向患者和护理人员强调饮料基质的作用,并且应该引入服务前测试。尽管在当前的本地框架和IDDSI框架之间使用了类似的分类和术语,应采取措施避免潜在的混淆和吞咽安全的相关威胁。
    This study aimed to evaluate an existing liquid-thickening guideline provided by a major manufacturer of thickener in Hong Kong and to provide directions for the implementation of the IDDSI framework. Fifteen participants who are naïve to liquid thickening were required to prepare thickened liquids samples from three drink bases (i.e., Milk-tea, Chinese tea, and Herbal tea) at two target consistency levels (i.e., mildly and medium/moderately thick) based on two guidelines (i.e., the manufacturer\'s guideline and an IDDSI-driven guideline). Viscosities of the samples were measured rheologically to reflect liquid consistency. The manufacturer\'s guideline resulted in distinguishable viscosities at the two consistency levels (F(1, 35.464) = 113.764, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.802), as well as different viscosities in different drink bases (F(1.267, 35.464 = 92.951, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.769). Comparison between the manufacturer\'s and the IDDSI-driven guideline showed that the later resulted in more viscous liquid samples in all drink bases and at both consistency levels. The difference between the two guidelines was statistically significant (F(1,28) = 35.137, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.557). Following only the manufacturer\'s guideline when thickening non-water beverages may lead to discrepancy between the resultant and prescribed consistencies. Thus, it should be considered inadequate to ensure swallowing safety. The effect of drink base should be emphasized to patients and caregivers, and pre-serving tests should be introduced. Despite similar classifications and terminologies used between the current local framework and the IDDSI framework, measures should be taken to avoid potential confusions and associated threats to swallowing safety.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号